Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muwema & Mugerwa (Uganda)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Muwema & Mugerwa (Uganda)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable lawfirm. Citations are all to mentions in passing about the firm, or one significant source about Muwema, but as owner of SC Villa, not as a lawyer and not about his firm. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The subject was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muwema & Mugerwa two days ago. I don't know if this qualifies for a G4 speedy. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not finding non-trivial coverage by reliable sources. Nominator's assessment of the citations is correct. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The references just show this to be a firm going about its business, as any firm must if it is to survive. No evidence of encyclopaedic notability. Also worth salting this and other name variants as they emerge. AllyD (talk) 05:41, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.