Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parker Self

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Parker Self

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL. Not notable trial court judge. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep non federal judge, but the references seem fine to me. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:NPOL-failing local trial judge (for non-U.S. folks, the fact that his jurisdiction covers more than one county/parish doesn't make him "statewide"; that's just how some states' trial-level judicial districts/circuits happen to be set up, and that particular chunk of Louisiana isn't large or particularly significant). - Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:22, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 04:50, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I just don't think Judge Self rises to notability. --Lockley (talk) 10:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He is chief judge of the court and a notable figure in Bossier and Webster parishes.64.134.48.31 (talk) 17:57, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.