Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pribanic & Pribanic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pribanic & Pribanic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo article by WP:SPA about a law firm that does not meet WP:GNG. The secondary sources cited either don't mention the firm, or contain a WP:Trivial mention. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 23:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 00:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 00:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is a completely ordinary and run of the mill law firm, which fails even my allegedly too easy standards. Bearian (talk) 18:27, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've searched for sources. None worth spending my time to get this up to speed. Like Bearian, I too am generally bent towards putting in effort and improving any savable article. Nothing to save here unfortunately. Lourdes 02:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.