Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proactive communications

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per the last few arguments provided, as the topic seems to meet WP:GNG and there don't appear to be any other concerns meriting deletion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proactive communications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable marketing buzzword. The article itself flits between impenetrable business jargon and banal statements of the obvious ("it's better to address problems before they happen"). Joe Roe (talk) 22:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Pls see below; Original comment: per WP:NOTDICTIONARY and rather trivial business concept. Of course, customer communications need to be "proactive" for best results. Not sure what else to add except for jargon that is included in the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as examining the sources have simply found essential PR and guides for a word involved with exactly that, PR. There's nothing at all forming of substance to suggest a both sufficiently improved and then convincing article. SwisterTwister talk 23:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The sources provided by Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs) demonstrate that the term "proactive communications" goes beyond a dictionary definition.

    As one book published by Springer Science+Business Media provided by Northamerica1000 notes:

    Today, individual organizations engage in public disclosure practices, provide corporate donations and sponsorships, sign on to principled ideals from institutions of moral authority (e.g., sign onto the UN's Kyoto Protocol), and participate in conferences, public discussions, and open panels.

    Their communication may be proactive or reactive. This chapter focuses primarily on proactive communication:

    Proactivity has come to refer to a more or less unspecified set of nondefensive or nonreactive practices through which organizations handle their relations with the external world. Instead of waiting for threats and opportunities to become manifest imperatives, the proactive organization attempts to influence and shape external developments in ways considered favorable in terms of its own aspirations. (Cheney and Christensen 2001, p. 253)

    Some organizations position themselves as proactive when they are actually engaging in a discursive fiction (i.e., saying they are taking positive actions when they are not) (Zoller and Tener 2010). True proactivity requires involves working with multiple and varied stakeholders to anticipate potential harms and to adopt environmentally sustainable practices (Bullis and Ie 2007). True environmental leaders make sustainability initiatives and communication an integral part of their core business strategy; create alliances to foster progress on targeted sustainability issues; implement Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) reporting and fully and transparently meet the standards; integrate sustainability into corporate stories, mission, vision, and values; and direct varied, yet complementary, communication toward key stakeholder groups (Peloza et al. 2012).

    That a chapter in a business book published by Springer Science+Business Media focuses mostly on "proactive communications" strongly establishes that the concept goes beyond a dictionary definition.

    Cunard (talk) 02:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment – The sources I provided above cover aspects of proactive communications, which in some aspects is partially related to, but is not dependent upon the topic of public relations, which is also a notable topic. However, the sources cover additional aspects of the topic. None of the sources I provided above are public relations content in and of itself, as in press releases or promotional content designed to promote something. There is plenty of substance in the sources to base an article upon, such as proactive communications management, issue management, use of data relative to proactive communications, organization communications, the topic as it relates to teamwork in organizations and customer service, and more. Furthermore, the sources I provided above are examples; more sources are readily available and easily found, as denoted by more examples below I have provided. The topic is clearly quite notable. North America1000 07:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More references

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  12:12, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.