Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red5 (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 05:56, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Red5

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. I don't see anything other than local coverage for this retailer. Article has been tagged for notability since March 2008. Safiel (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - and Salt. With tags dated 2008 and 2009 in an article that was speedy deleted in its previous AFD in 2010 as a G4, I'm assuming the text is once again the same. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 18:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete not sure whether a G4 technically applies, as at least some of the previous deletions were about a software company. In any case, non-notable, likely self-promotion, all the usual. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This incarnation was actually created at Red5 (retailer) (by an SPA) on March 9, 2008, was moved to the current title by an administrator in 2012. It's existence thus actually precedes the deleted versions at this name. Due to the nearly 4 1/2 year, lapse from the 1st AfD which ended in a delete (2nd ended in speedy delete), I thought it more appropriate to go to AfD than to try to invoke G4. Safiel (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I hadn't considered that path. I have struck my original !vote and will try again. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 19:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No secondary reliable sources to be found that do anything more than mention the subject when discussing the company's founder. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 19:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.