Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reservation of rights
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Reservation of rights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Speedy DeleteWeak Keep, no external references whatsoever. Isn't there a CSD tag for this? OK, there are references now but I still believe external references are required. ToxicWasteGrounds 20:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The references are now visible thanks to User:Mkativerata adding the missing "reflist" tag. John of Reading (talk) 21:34, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I've reformatted the references John of Reading (talk) 08:44, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
*Snow/Speedy Keep -- as nom now also views as a keep (albeit a weak one). AfD is not the place to force editing changes, and this article is clearly notable.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.