Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saemaul Sports Hall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. SIGCOV established. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saemaul Sports Hall

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and NGEO, no sources showing this meets WP:N with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from WP:IS WP:RS. BEFORE found listings and name mentions in mill news, nothing meeting WP:SIGCOV for the subject. // Timothy :: talk 06:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Sports, Olympics, and South Korea. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but the article needs to be rescoped. The Eng article fails to mention it, but I think the article title is only the first in a series of changes the building went under. It was sold to KBS, then used as a sports building under various names, remodeled, and has since 2015 gone by the name "KBS Arena Hall" (different from KBS Hall), and is now a concert hall. [1][2][3][4] toobigtokale (talk) 11:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the Korean article has 2 good Korean language sources that explain the renovation/updated use in 2015: [5], [6]. I imagine more may exist in Korean language too. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More discussion on the sources presented in this discussion in light of WP:SIGCOV would be helpful in attaining a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, all of the sources I linked previously are substantial discussions of the subject of the article. toobigtokale (talk) 10:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notability is whether there are sources, not about the state of the article - my sense is the sources presented here show notability. SportingFlyer T·C 15:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.