Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrishti Ganguly Rindani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shrishti Ganguly Rindani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Her only "Notable" role is a secondary role in just one "web series" ,which itself is 10 episodes long, on a not so popular streaming platform. I don't think that is enough to justify an article. Daiyusha (talk) 14:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Daiyusha (talk) 14:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Daiyusha (talk) 14:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article is filled with unreliable sources. The first two are just episode lists, which are passing mentions, and the third one doesn't even mention the main subject. 🌺Kori🌺 - (@) 17:13, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable actress. I have a strong suspicion that a lot of our articles on actresses and actors are on non-notable people. We clearly have let new articles be too easy to create.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnpacklambert: its a stupid loophole/cycle. If an actor has role in "multiple" notable tv shows/films, actor is considered notable. Multiple is considered as "2 or more than 2" in AfD by fanboys, or UPEs. And the guidelines for TV shows are way too lax. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I actually think the worst loophole we may have though is considering almost every film produced by the "Holloywood" complex from 1920-1950 to be notable. There were huge numbers of films produced in that time. In many of them we have interpreted some very minor parts as "significant". I have found a few films that have articles with no sources, not even IMDb, listed.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Then there is Handle with Care (1932 film). I see none of the sourced looking better than a directory listing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: My WP:BEFORE did not yield any results that would help make out WP:GNG, and the subject hasn't had enough significant roles in notable productions to meet WP:NACTOR, either. Dflaw4 (talk) 13:22, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.