Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special Tactical Squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Eventual merge could be discussed in the article's talk page, obviously. Cavarrone 12:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Special Tactical Squad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability and completely unreferenced. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The topic is a valid one though, this unit does exist and does get news coverage, and presumably even more coverage in Chinese. I've pinged the originator asking them if they want it moved to Draft so they can take their time adding sources. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found the following potential sources: [1], [2], [3]. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Are we sure this isn't a duplication of Special Duties Unit, another sub-unit of Police Tactical Unit (Hong Kong)? I daresay a merge may be in order here, regardless. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- No, wait, the Special Duties Unit is much older, sorry. Anyway, this seems to be a case where an editor has made a content fork unnecessarily: there is no mention of the Special Tactical Squad that I can see in the PTU main article, and that's why it remains an unreferenced orphan. I'd suggest a merge and redirect to Police Tactical Unit (Hong Kong), claimed to be the parent organization, based on the poor state of this stub -- unless someone wishes to roll up their sleeves and really expand it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Police Tactical Unit (Hong Kong). Obviously a valid topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.