Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunset International Bible Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sunset International Bible Institute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on an organisation that lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 22:14, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - poorly sourced, but that's not grounds for deletion; meets our minimal standards for notability, although it may need to be stubbed of the primary-source fluff. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Which standards? duffbeerforme (talk) 07:42, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Colleges and high schools are generally regarded as inherently notable; that's long-standing consensus. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, doesn't appear to be substantially different from other religious colleges. Nyttend (talk) 11:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.