Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribulation (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Apocalypse (film series). – bradv🍁 06:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tribulation (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite starring several notable people, this film doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. The article is currently unsourced, and the only source I could find directly discussing this film in-depth is [1]. This film is mentioned in one paragraph at [2], but that paragraph is really only talking about the series as a whole, not this film in particular. This film is from 2000, so it is possible there are print sources. This is the third film in Apocalypse (film series), the fourth was recently redirected as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apocalypse IV: Judgment. This film may have Howie Mandel in it, but it's still a WP:GNG failure. Hog Farm (talk) 04:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 04:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 04:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with the main series article, and do the same with the article on film 2 in the series. The series as a whole might be notable, but the individual films probably aren’t. Dronebogus (talk) 07:56, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge - The series itself appears to be notable, I think, but this individual movie does not by comparison. I agree. It may have prominent performers in it, but as stated above there doesn't appear to be that much coverage. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.