Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tridhya Tech Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tridhya Tech Limited

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

That age-old story, sent to draft by NPP and banged right back into mainspace, this Indian technology company does not pass WP:GNG; WP:NCORP and has no enduring notability - WP:SERIESA also applies. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Software, and India. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Gujarat. AllyD (talk) 06:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article on an IT Services firm, supported largely by press items about some longstanding employees being given company cars. (For context, the Mint item lists other companies which have done the same.) There is also text and announcement-based coverage of takeovers of a couple of other IT Services / web development firms, which falls under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH, as does the current IPO. A company going about its business, but I am not seeing evidence demonstrating attained notability. AllyD (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.