Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UHarc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:30, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- UHarc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- NotAnonymous0 did I err?|Contribs 04:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete for now. Google news turns up a bunch of potential refs in Chinese and other East Asian languages, e.g. [1] from 163.com, but I can't tell if those are merely hosted blogs or what. When some knowledgeable editor becomes available, he or she should undelete and wp:userfy this article for further work. There's also an OnSoftware blog entry for a 3rd party GUI for this program [2], but that in itself is not very useful to write about UHarc itself. Pcap ping 14:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.