Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zdzisław Jan Zamoyski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Navou banter 04:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Zdzisław Jan Zamoyski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-noteable Polish guy, fails WP:BIO, WP:N blah blah blah. Next! Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments: It would be good if there was an institutionalized or semi-institutionalized process for directly querying editors from country X about entries concerning those countries. I do note that Polish Wikipedia seems not to have an article on the individual in question. —SlamDiego←T 21:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- There are regional notice boards. I informed the Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. Pavel Vozenilek 21:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- And Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 22:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, and the deletion sorting process goes a fair way towards what I am suggesting. But we really want to encourage nominators or would-be nominators who are not from the country in question to contact those who are. (And I say “country” because, in particular, I note various British editors passing bizarre judgments on the notability of things American.) —SlamDiego←T 00:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Zamoyski was one of important Polish magnate families. Most of the 39 articles in Category:Zamoyski family, however, are of low quality and perhaps would be better merged into one article. Pavel Vozenilek 21:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletions. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 22:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A notable government official (podstoli passes WP:BIO 1st criteria for politician) and member of a notable family. PS. The second criteria is not enough for notability, and I do agree that some of the stubs in that (and similar cats) would probably be best merged.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 22:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - frivolous AfD posted by another Wikibrat - blah, blah, blah, next - this incoherent talk is not enough to document failing the WP:BIO or WP:N in this article. greg park avenue 02:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Piotrus. Bigdaddy1981 16:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep per Piotrus. I'm not convinced that podstoli is high enough an office for the relevant WP:BIO criterion, but I'd rather err on the side of caution. JoshuaZ 20:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.