Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 June 10

June 10

File:Phineas and Ferb Costumes.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Costumes of copyrighted characters Phineas Flynn and Ferb Fletcher. Unacceptable derivative works. ✗plicit 00:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close file is on Commons not En.wiki -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 03:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:St. Pius X school crest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No indication that this is under a CC license. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ad. If this a photo, the photo is licensed under CC but the logo isn't. So, permission is still needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let's tag with {{FoP-Ireland}} and move to Commons. Ireland has freedom of panorama for 2-D works. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 11:19, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doubt this is a photo (there's no EXIF), and even if it is, this is effectively a scan. Should be re-licensed to non-free, however it's not used in the mainspace, so suggest delete with no prejudice to restoration iff relicensed AND if the userspace draft gets promoted to article. -FASTILY 23:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rainforestcafesignoprymills.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free sculpture, fails the NFCC for minimal use because the logo is already elsewhere in the article (correctly tagged as non-free). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IBSA Committeeman William Preble Hall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCCP #1 - there is a free image of Hall available in the article already. No need for this file Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, file is public domain. I did a little digging, as one is wont to do when copyright status is unclear. I found a a blog article discussing this photo:

General Hall was one of the group, and in the photograph below from the 1912 convention report, he is third from the left, just behind CTR who is seated.

The Quirky Kitty (talk) 11:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If it's actually public domain, the closing admin should restore the original higher resolution file. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 14:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It could also be moved to Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 18:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UIQ 3.1 Screenshot 2.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:UIQ 3.1 Screenshot 2.gif Magog the Ogre (t • c) 13:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:British halfpenny coin 1971 obverse.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Move to Commons. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's been 51 years since 1971 - crown copyright has expired. Furthermore, URAA doesn't apply: per commons:Template:PD-UKGov, Crown copyright applies worldwide. —Matr1x-101 $_{when-replying}^{Ping-me}$ {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 14:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have restarted this discussion since the previous discussion was kept based on the grounds of URAA, which doesn't apply here, since the expiry of crown copyright applies worldwide. —Matr1x-101

_{when-replying}^{Ping-me}

{_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 14:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restore original file and move to Commons per nomination. URAA doesn't apply. Abzeronow (talk) 18:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, move to Commons. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 08:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xbox avatar socks and sandals.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fails NFCC #8. A non-free image of digital socks and sandals are hardly necessary for illustrating the article Socks and sandals, and the tie-in mention of the Xbox avatar isn't critical to the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, doesn't serve much of any function. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 04:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.