The power of your voice
548,218,898 people taking action
On Change.org, people connect across geographic and cultural borders to support causes they care about.













Impact report
Our Impact Report describes how we pursue our mission: empowering people to create the change they want to see. Click below to explore the details.
Download reportSignatures become victories
People on Change.org work with decision makers to find new solutions to the big and small issues that impact their lives.


Nearly every hour, a petition on Change.org achieves victory
Victory highlights
- Victory!8th grader changes school calendar; gets a call from MayorThanks to Issac's petition and 23K signers, NYC students will not go to school for a one-day week on Monday, Dec. 23. Mayor Eric Adams delivered the news directly to Issac – on speaker phone in front of his entire class. Read more
Isaac Regnier
23,015 Supporters - Victory!FDA approves first needle-free emergency epinephrine treatmentDave, the father of a child with severe food allergies, led a petition to introduce an alternative to the EpiPen – a device that can spark fear and cause hesitation. With a nasal spray now approved by the FDA, Dave hopes more lives will be saved. Read more
Dave Bloom
40,561 Supporters - Victory!Amazon announces huge reduction in plastic packagingAmazon will stop using puffy plastic shipping pillows in North America, marking a huge victory for the nearly 800,000 people who supported a petition calling for this change.Read more
Nicole Delma
784,676 Supporters - Victory!Maulik Pancholy's Empathy & Anti-Bullying Assembly ReinstatedAfter a PA school board canceled an assembly because of the presenter's "lifestyle," parents, students, and community members fought back. Thanks to their efforts, Pancholy's assembly is back on. Read more
Trisha Comstock
9,749 Supporters
Powered by members
Our most committed users contribute a small amount monthly to keep Change.org free and open for everyone.
Become a member
Your voice matters
These petitions need your help to achieve victory.- Protect the U.S. Postal Service: A Vital Public Service for All AmericansThe IssueMy husband has worked for USPS for 10 years, serving as a carrier, clerk, and manager. He has delivered mail in small towns, worked the front counter helping customers, and managed operations to keep mail moving efficiently. It’s not a glamorous job—it’s long hours, brutal weather, old trucks, and often thankless work. But he loves it. Like so many postal workers, he takes pride in serving his community, making sure businesses stay open, people receive their medications, and families across America get their mail just as reliably as those in big cities. It’s easy to forget how important the Postal Service is—until you need it and it’s not there. My elderly mother still depends on her mail, both for essential medications and for running her small business. If shipping costs rise, so do her expenses. I work in a small legal firm, where we rely on the mail every day. If we had to pay more for postage, we’d have no choice but to charge our clients more—and I imagine the courts would have to do the same. That means higher legal costs, making access to justice even more out of reach for people who are already struggling. That is why this petition is so important—to remind our lawmakers about the communities they represent, how vital the Postal Service is to their constituents, and that the 660,000 hardworking postal workers are also their constituents. These are the people who keep mail moving every day, ensuring that Americans—no matter where they live—receive essential services. Beyond their role in USPS, postal workers contribute to the economy through their jobs, spending their earnings in local businesses, paying taxes, and supporting their communities. Any reduction in postal services isn’t just about mail—it’s about livelihoods and economic stability across the country. Our elected leaders must stand up and protect them, too. To: The U.S. Senate, House of Representatives & State LeadersThe U.S. Postal Service (USPS) is critical to Americans across the country, especially in rural areas, small businesses, and communities that rely on affordable, reliable mail delivery. However, ongoing efforts to privatize or merge USPS with private carriers threaten its ability to serve every address—no matter how remote—and put the entire country at risk. We, the undersigned, urge federal and state leaders to oppose any efforts to privatize or merge USPS and instead take action to ensure it remains a self-sustaining, independent public service under direct Congressional oversight, accountable to the American people—not private corporations. I. Why USPS is Essential to the United StatesUSPS Provides Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs & Strengthens the U.S. EconomyUSPS employs over 660,000 Americans across every state. With large processing and distribution plants nationwide, the Postal Service processes millions of mail pieces daily and provides stable jobs to hundreds of thousands of workers. Post offices in every city, town, and rural community ensure mail delivery while employing dedicated clerks, carriers, and support staff. These workers are not just employees—they are voters, taxpayers, and members of the very communities lawmakers represent. If USPS is weakened, merged with private carriers, or privatized, these jobs could be lost or drastically reduced, harming not just postal workers, but businesses and consumers who rely on affordable mail services. Postal Workers Drive Economic GrowthBeyond delivering mail, postal workers fuel the economy through their wages. Their salaries go back into local businesses, housing markets, and public services. They pay taxes, shop in their communities, and support small businesses, keeping local economies thriving. A loss of postal jobs wouldn’t just affect the USPS—it would ripple through entire communities, hurting businesses and economic stability nationwide. Rural Americans Depend on USPSUnlike private carriers, USPS delivers to every address at the same price, no matter where you live. Without it, thousands of Americans could face higher delivery costs or lose service entirely. Small Businesses Need Affordable ShippingUSPS provides low-cost shipping options that keep small businesses running. If privatized or merged, shipping costs will surge, just as they did in the UK and Germany. A Key Player in the National EconomyThe Postal Service ensures that businesses across agriculture, retail, healthcare, and manufacturing can ship and receive goods affordably. Many farmers, small producers, and local businesses depend on USPS to distribute their goods efficiently and cost-effectively. USPS Supports Veterans, Seniors & the DisabledMillions of Americans depend on USPS for medications, Social Security checks, and VA benefits. Privatization or a merger with private companies could delay or increase costs for these essential services. Ballot & Election Mail is at StakeUSPS ensures that every voter—especially in rural areas—can vote by mail. Private companies have no legal obligation to deliver ballots securely and on time. II. USPS is NOT a Drain on Taxpayers—It Pays for ItselfUSPS does not receive regular taxpayer funding. It operates on postage revenue, and in the past 50 years, it has received just $20 billion in government support—less than what the U.S. spends on defense in a single month. If USPS did require tax dollars, it would cost less per person per year than:• One cup of store-bought coffee per day for a year (or one Starbucks drink per month for 12 months—about $60 per year)• Eight dozen eggs• 20 gallons of gas And yet, you don’t pay for USPS unless you use it. Privatization could cost you 50% more as it has in other countries. III. What Congress & State Leaders Can Do Right Now1. Oppose Any Efforts to Privatize or Merge USPSThe U.S. Senate and House of Representatives must reject any legislation that weakens, privatizes, or merges USPS with private carriers. This would only drive up costs, reduce service to rural communities, and harm the economy. 2. Ensure USPS Remains Under Congressional OversightCongress must keep USPS accountable to the American people, not private corporations. Keeping it under Congressional oversight ensures that mail service remains fair, affordable, and accessible to every American. 3. Support Legislation Allowing USPS to Modernize & Generate RevenueInstead of cuts, Congress should advocate for reforms that help USPS expand package services, restore postal banking, and renegotiate outdated international agreements to keep prices low. 4. Protect USPS Processing Plants & Rural Post OfficesAny reduction in USPS services will directly harm the U.S. economy, rural communities, and small businesses. Our leaders must oppose plant closures, service reductions, or job losses that impact Americans nationwide. Sign the Petition to Tell Congress & State Leaders: USPS is Worth Protecting!More Resources: 📌 PreserveUSPS.orgThis website is dedicated to preserving the USPS as a public institution. It provides research and counterarguments to popular misconceptions or arguments for privatization. 📌 H.Res.70This resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should take all appropriate measures to ensure that the USPS remains an independent establishment of the Federal Government and is not subject to privatization. It serves as a formal call to action, urging legislators to safeguard this vital public service. 📌 5calls.org5 Calls is a advocacy platform that empowers citizens to call their elected officials on key issues like postal reform. It offers simple tools and guidance for making your voice heard on preserving our public services. ***Disclaimer: This petition was created entirely by me, independent of my husband. He had no role in designing or drafting it. My motivation comes from my deep appreciation for him and for the U.S. Postal Service, which serves countless Americans. The views expressed in this petition are solely my own and do not represent the U.S. Postal Service, its employees, or any affiliated unions. Read more
Ann Z
1,628,930 Supporters - Free Wendy Williams from GuardianshipWendy Williams, an international icon, has faced numerous challenges in recent years. Her situation is not just a personal struggle but also an issue that resonates with many who believe in the importance of personal freedom and family ties. Currently, she is under conservatorship and contractual restrictions that limit her access to her own finances and prevent her from freely seeing her loved ones.Conservatorships are designed to protect individuals who cannot care for themselves or manage their own finances. However, they can sometimes become tools of control rather than protection. In Wendy's case, it appears that the conservatorship is causing more harm than good by isolating her from those she holds dear.The impact of such restrictions on an individual's mental health cannot be overstated. According to the American Psychological Association (APA), social isolation can lead to serious mental health issues such as depression and anxiety disorders.We urge all relevant parties involved in Wendy's case to reconsider these restrictive measures. Let us stand together for Wendy Williams' right to see her family freely and manage her own finances without undue interference or control.Please sign this petition if you believe in granting Wendy Williams the freedom she deserves. Share this petition to help Free Wendy Williams. Use the hashtag #FreeWendyRead more
Arthur Haywood
25,234 Supporters - Stop Medicare from Limiting Home Telehealth Coverage on April 1, 2025I am a cancer specialist, regularly attending to patients in rural areas of Southern Colorado. Many of my patients live in rural communities, far removed from immediate healthcare access, or are homebound due to their conditions. Since the COVID pandemic, Medicare has allowed telehealth or "virtual visits" from the home setting. Beginning April 1, 2025, home telehealth visits will be greatly limited and rural patients will need to travel to a local clinic to complete a telehealth visit. Rural patients exhibit higher mortality rates, with longer distances to travel for care acting as a significant barrier to treatment (Journal of Rural Health). Among the homebound population, a substantial portion live with multiple chronic conditions, and interruption of their telehealth services can lead to potential health crises (American Journal of Public Health). For patients living with a cancer diagnosis or chronic conditions, telehealth provides an important link to their care team. Telehealth also helps alleviate costly travel to medical appointments, time off work, and child care expenses. A review of studies of different telehealth implementations published on PubMed from January 2017 to December 2020 showed that "Telehealth models were associated with positive outcomes for patients and health care professionals, suggesting these models are feasible and can be effective." Butzner M, Cuffee Y J Med Internet Res 2021;23(8):e29575doi: 10.2196/29575Therefore, we ask that Medicare extend its coverage for home telehealth visits beyond April 1 2025. This measure would not only ensure that rural and homebound patients continue receiving the care they need but would also greatly contribute to alleviating healthcare disparities across rural America. Stand with us in the fight against insufficient healthcare access. Support rural and homebound patients by signing this petition today.Read more
Robert Hoyer, MD
23,666 Supporters - Petition to Protect Topanga and LA County from Toxic Waste Sorting SiteThe community of Topanga, citizens of Los Angeles county strongly oppose the Environmental Protection Agency's proposed Palisades fire debris staging site located at the base of Highway 27 and the PCH (a California State Park) We understand the importance and urgency of this issue but ask the EPA to consider alternatives as it will very likely have detrimental effects on our environment, economy, cultural history and the health and safety of our community. The site is dangerously close to Topanga creek a vital watershed that is home to the federally endangered steelhead trout. The site is on land that is sacred to the Indigenous tribes of this region. We are deeply concerned that contaminants from the debris could leach into the soil and waterways. Not to mention the toxic particulates that could make their way into our air and carried by onshore winds directly to our town of Topanga where people live, work and play. The risk this poses to ocean water quality is also alarming. Local businesses are already struggling and this would deter visitors to our town that relies on tourism. These serious environmental, economic, and public safety risks cannot be overstated. I urge you to stand with us in opposing the proposed EPA fire debris staging site near Topanga lagoon and the PCH. Please sign this petition to protect our homes, preserve our environment, sustain our economy, and safeguard our families' health. FURTHER DETAILS 1. Environmental Threat to Waterways and the Ocean Toxic waste stored near water sources poses a severe contamination risk. Topanga Creek, which feeds directly into the ocean, is particularly vulnerable. Study: Surface Water Contamination from Hazardous Waste Storage Sites (EPA, 2005) found that hazardous waste leached into soil and waterways when stored on unprotected ground, leading to long-term pollution in local water sources.Example: The Superfund Research Program at UC Berkeley has documented severe groundwater contamination caused by improper hazardous waste storage, affecting communities for decades.California Coastal Commission Report (2022): Stresses that coastal areas should not be used for hazardous material storage due to high risks of leaching into marine ecosystems.Safer Alternatives Exist:Instead of placing toxic waste in a sensitive coastal watershed, safer options such as Will Rogers State Park’s parking lot (an impermeable surface) or Malibu’s Carnival Grounds (a designated event space) should be considered. 2. Fire Risk and Lack of Evacuation Routes Topanga residents remain barricaded inside the canyon while Malibu residents receive PCH access passes. This creates a serious safety risk—especially since the proposed toxic waste site is at the base of one of our only two emergency exits. California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Report (2023): Lists Topanga as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and emphasizes that limited evacuation routes increase wildfire casualties.Study: Wildfire Evacuation and Road Access (UC Davis, 2020) found that blocked exits during wildfires significantly increase loss of life.Case Study: The 2024 Topanga landslide already isolated the community and highlighted the dangers of limited evacuation options. A similar scenario during a wildfire could be catastrophic.Topanga residents need unrestricted access to PCH, just as Malibu residents do. Blocking one of only two escape routes for a toxic waste facility puts thousands of lives at risk. As such we are also working with the county, and pleading with the county, to provide PCH passes to the Topanga residents 3. Route Access and the Dangers of Using Highway 27 Using Highway 27 as a route for toxic waste transport is highly dangerous and irresponsible, yet we have no written confirmation that this route will not be used. Topanga Canyon Blvd (Hwy 27) is notoriously treacherous, with frequent mudslides, rockslides, and accidents—especially on the S-Curve, one of the most dangerous stretches of highway in Los Angeles County.Exiting the Topanga Ranch Motel site requires making a left turn onto a high-speed, high-traffic highway—an extremely dangerous maneuver for large hazardous waste trucks.In contrast, Will Rogers State Park offers a safer option: trucks would turn right at a signalized intersection, directly onto PCH, improving traffic flow and reducing accident risk.Population Density: Topanga is home to nearly 13,000 residents and active businesses, all of whom depend on Hwy 27 for daily life. In contrast, traffic at Temescal and Will Rogers has drastically decreased due to the fires, making those locations far less disruptive and much safer.Supporting Data on Road Safety: California Highway Patrol Accident Data (2023): Identifies the Hwy 27 S-Curve as a high-risk zone due to frequent accidents.Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Study (2021): Shows that left-hand turns onto busy highways significantly increase accident risk—whereas right-hand turns at traffic signals reduce collisions by up to 60%. 4. Risk of Accidents Due to Hasty Cleanup & Dangerous Location Near a Gas Station The 30-day EPA deadline increases the likelihood of serious errors in handling toxic waste. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report (GAO-20-73): Warns that rushed hazardous waste cleanup leads to mismanagement, accidental exposure, and contamination risks.Study: Hazardous Waste Management Under Time Constraints (Environmental Science & Technology, 2019) found that shortened deadlines increase human error in waste handling.Additionally, the proposed site is directly across from a gas station—a critical safety hazard. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Study (2022): Shows that toxic chemicals stored near fuel sources dramatically increase the risk of explosions.EPA Risk Management Plan (RMP) Rule (2019): Requires minimum buffer zones between hazardous waste sites and flammable fuel sources—this site fails to meet those safety requirements.Example: The West, Texas Fertilizer Plant Explosion (2013) was caused by improper storage of hazardous materials near combustible substances, leading to mass casualties.This combination of rushed cleanup, hazardous transport conditions, and dangerous proximity to fuel sources makes this site completely unsuitable for toxic waste storage. 5. Protection of Indigenous Cultural and Sacred Land The Topanga Ranch Motel site is sacred land to the local Indigenous Tongva and Gabrielino tribes. California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Designation: Recognizes this area as culturally significant to Indigenous communities.Federal Cultural Protection Laws (e.g., National Historic Preservation Act, Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act): Typically forbid hazardous projects on sacred lands, yet this protection appears to have been waived due to emergency status.Community Responsibility: We must respect and protect these lands rather than desecrate them with toxic waste storage. Conclusion: Why This Matters Scientific research confirms that rushed hazardous waste removal increases risks.EPA and environmental studies warn against storing toxic materials near water sources or flammable sites.Fire and evacuation experts stress the importance of open access routes in high-risk fire zones like Topanga.Safer, more logical alternative locations exist that minimize environmental and public safety risks.The proposed site is culturally significant and should be protected, not contaminated.We demand that this site be removed from consideration immediately. Instead, hazardous waste storage must be placed in a safer, more appropriate location that does not endanger our homes, environment, and heritage. Please sign and share to protect Topanga and our community. Read more
Bonnie Wright
14,560 Supporters