Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    The King Takes Your Castle: City Laws That Restrict Your Property Rights
    The King Takes Your Castle: City Laws That Restrict Your Property Rights
    The King Takes Your Castle: City Laws That Restrict Your Property Rights
    Ebook184 pages1 hour

    The King Takes Your Castle: City Laws That Restrict Your Property Rights

    By Richard R Sylvester

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

       This book describes the critical issues facing the public in view of the rapid growth and economic impact of the sharing economy, which has resulted in internet firms, such as Airbnb and HomeAway, to rapidly become larger than major hotel chains, with company value measured in multiple billions of dollars. 

      

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherAcademia Publishing Company
    Release dateNov 27, 2015
    ISBN9780932010032
    The King Takes Your Castle: City Laws That Restrict Your Property Rights
    Author

    Richard R Sylvester

    Richard R. Sylvester, J.D., Ph.D. is a mathematical economist with specialization in valuation. He is a specialist in determining economic damages, investment risk and uncertainty, contingent liabilities, and the present value of future cash flow for property rights. He has valued information technology firms, rental properties, patents, copyrights, and music rights. He is a specialist in the use of quantitative methods for assessment of risk, including stochastic calculus, for securities valuation including the probability of a specific range of future price fluctuation for a publicly traded stock. For three decades, he has been retained by major law firms and the Board of Directors of major corporations to value corporate stock, partnership shares, and the value of patents, copyrights, and intangible assets, for firms such as Comsat and Pioneer Electronics. As an independent expert, he was selected by the Internal Revenue Service to substantiate claims of $700 million income tax underpayment by two large integrated oil companies. He has over thirty years of top-level professional experience, including the corporate staff of Fortune 500 firms, including General Motors and Hughes Aircraft. He has served on the division staff of several firms, such as Lockheed California Company, TRW Systems Group, and General Dynamics. He established the land acquisition price for major land development projects for Great Southwest Corporation. He qualified as an expert witness in Federal District Court, U.S. Federal Claims Court, and California Superior Court. For over three decades, his background has been listed in Marquis Who's Who in the World, Who's Who in America, and Who's Who in Finance and Industry (1980-2015). He won competitive academic awards from the Ford Foundation, General Motors, the U.S. Federal Government, and the Regents of the University of California (1957-70). He was a featured guest speaker at the 1980 national economic seminar, sharing the speaker's podium with former President Ford. He was a featured economist on ABC Prime Time Live, June 27, 1991, a documentary nominated for the Emmy. For three decades, he has advised the boards of major corporations and agencies of the U.S. Government regarding strategic planning and direction for advanced technology projects. For two decades, as a Lecturer or Associate Professor, he has taught economics, business law, quantitative methods, and management at UCLA, USC, Pepperdine, Loyola, University of Redlands, and California State University. His education includes the following: J.D., Loyola Law School, Dean's Honor List, Federal Tax Law, 1981. Postdoctoral Scholar, UCLA, Electronics Engineering, 1971-74. Ph.D., UCLA, Economics, Management, Marketing, Engineering, 1970. M.B.A., USC, Management, Finance, 1962. B.A., UCLA, Letters and Science, 1959.

    Related to The King Takes Your Castle

    Titles in the series (59)

    View More
    View More

    Related ebooks

    Business For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • UNLIMITED

      What Biden’s Win Means for the Future of Criminal Justice

      Nov 8, 2020

      Joe Biden ran on the most progressive criminal justice platform of any major party candidate in generations. So what can he actually do?

      12 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      How to Get Your Estate Plan Done While Under Coronavirus Quarantine

      Mar 30, 2020

      The coronavirus lockdown began in the California counties of Sacramento, Palm Springs, Los Angeles and Ventura, issuing unprecedented orders for all residents to remain in their homes except for certain essential activities. Then Gov. Gavin Newsom ex

      5 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      To Help The Homeless, There’s An App For That

      Mar 4, 2019

      Cities across California and the country are embracing digital tools to reduce the guesswork in counting homeless people – advances that in turn could fortify efforts to help them.

      6 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Where Coronavirus Is Surging—And Electronic Surveillance, Too

      Nov 22, 2020

      In Chicago and elsewhere, the number of people wearing an ankle monitor has jumped in recent months due to the pandemic.

      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Are You Ready for Longevity? 4 Steps to Take Now

      Aug 13, 2018

      Did you know that a non-smoking 65-year-old woman today has a 50% chance of living until 88? A non-smoking 65-year-old man has a 50% chance of living until 85? That's how life expectancy works - the longer you live, the more likely you will live lon

      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Do Trustees Become The Legal Guardians Of Your Children?

      Jul 24, 2020

      The guardianship of children is governed in terms of section 18 of the Children’s Act, whereas the role of trustees is governed by the common law and the Trust Property Control Act, explains Elmarie Neilson of Neilsons Attorneys. The powers of truste

      1 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      No Legalization of Sharia Law

      Jul 28, 2017

      Q: Did a Muslim federal judge rule two parts of sharia law legal? A: No. That only happened in a fake story on a satirical website. FULL ANSWER Sharia is […] The post No Legalization of Sharia Law appeared first on FactCheck.org.

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Use Of Trusts For Business And Trading

      May 15, 2021

      BANKRUPTCIES in South Africa averaged 229 companies a month from 1980 until 2020. In August last year, an all-time high of 511 companies declared bankruptcy, compared to the record low of 63 companies in May 1988. The projected bankruptcies for 2021

      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Rights And Responsibilities

      Jan 27, 2020

      Joseph Millum is an ethicist at The Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health in the US. Millum received his undergraduate degree from Edinburgh University and his PhD in philosophy from the University of Toronto. His current resea

      11 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Innocent Until Proven Poor

      Aug 1, 2018

      THREE YEARS AFTER A TEXAS STATE TROOPER RIPPED her out of her car and slammed her to the ground over a traffic violation, Sandra Bland’s name still evokes images of police brutality. Her name also remains on the lips of bail reform activists; her dea

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      How To Avoid The Ultimate Rip-off

      Mar 31, 2022

      Losing a loved one is hard enough, particularly during a pandemic, but what comes next can sometimes be complex and costly. There is organising the funeral, tracking down a will and winding up the estate. You have to tie up loose ends such as bank ac

      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Should I Change Lawyers?

      May 21, 2019

      "I was in a car accident several months ago and hired a personal injury attorney almost immediately. Initially, she was very responsive, returned my calls promptly, keeping me informed of everything. Then, suddenly, silence. I leave messages, am prom

      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Repo Risk: Beware Illegal Car Repossessions

      Jun 13, 2022

      Used cars are suddenly so much more appealing than they used to be. With prices near historic highs and inventory near record lows, some officials are warning people with car loans that unscrupulous lenders may use more aggressive - and possibly ille

      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      How to Avoid Litigation Costs

      Oct 18, 2019

      How to Avoid Litigation Costs
      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      PODCAST: Estate-Planning Your Stuff with T. Eric Reich

      Apr 21, 2021

      David Muhlbaum: When it comes to estate planning, money is usually front of mind. Makes sense, that's where decisions about wills, trusts and more can realize real tax savings. But it's stuff, tangible things like houses, china and collectibles that

      17 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Mobile-home Residents Unite To Take On Landlords

      Dec 17, 2018

      MARIBETH SHEEDY GOT A LETTER FROM her new landlord the day after Christmas last year. So did many of her neighbors in the Akron Manufactured Home Community in Akron, N.Y. The park’s new owner, Florida-based Sunrise Capital Investors, was proposing a

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Trustees Are Accountable To The Master Of The High Court

      Jan 16, 2021

      A TRUSTEE of a trust is accountable at all times to the Master of the High Court and to beneficiaries. If trustees’ actions (a single or multiple trustees) contravene either the provisions of the Trust Property Control Act or the trust instrument, th

      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Curious How Systemic Racism Works? Check Out Your Neighborhood.

      Oct 13, 2021

      Historical housing discrimination in Boston plays out today in systemic racism affecting homeownership, generational wealth, and education.

      7 min read

    Reviews for The King Takes Your Castle

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      The King Takes Your Castle - Richard R Sylvester

      Treatise

      Report to the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Senate

      The King Takes Your Castle

      City Laws That Restrict Your Property Rights

      Richard R. Sylvester, J.D., Ph.D.

      Copyright ©, Richard R. Sylvester, 2015

      All rights reserved

      All rights reserved. This publication contains proprietary information which is protected by federal copyright statute. Except as permitted by statute, no portion of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, published, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior agreement with the publisher.

      This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information regarding the subject matter. This publication does not replace legal, accounting or other professional service. The services of a competent specialist should be obtained. The author and publisher make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the quality, performance, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The author and publisher do not guarantee financial results and shall not be responsible for any damages related to the use or inability to use the concepts documented. Any and all risk is assumed only by the user.

      ISBN 978-0-932010-04-9 paperback

      ISBN 978-0-932010-03-2 electronic book, EPUB

      ISBN 978-0-932010-05-6 electronic book, MOBI

      Academia Publishing Company

      rrsylvester.com

      Acknowledgments

      The author recognizes the significant suggestions, insights, and thoughtful comments by law professors, attorneys, and hosts for Airbnb and HomeAway. Airbnb host revenue data is from Scott Shatford, www.airdna.com.

      The back cover photograph is by Kevyn Major Howard.

      The book illustration and photography is by the author.

      Dedicated to The Honorable Dianne Feinstein, United States Senate

      Caveat

      The facts and data in this document are accurate to the extent of the author’s knowledge and belief. Within the scope of the subject, the relevant critical facts and relationships are disclosed. However, the scope of this document is limited; many related issues and many details are not discussed.

      No opinion is rendered on whether the issues, methods or concepts would be applicable to a specific situation. Any financial projections presented are hypothetical and may not conform to any specific situation. Statutes and court interpretations are subject to change. The reader is cautioned to seek independent, unbiased, specialized counsel for any specific transaction.

      artart

      Table of Contents

      Copyright

      Foreword

      Discussion

      1. Discussion of Fifth Amendment Taking

      2. Discussion of Low Income Housing and Traditional Hotels

      3. Discussion of Economic Damages

      4. Calculation of Economic Damages

      5. Discussion of the Required Yield

      6. Calculation of the Required Yield

      7. Ethics

      Exhibits

      A. Economic Factors, House Prices, Inflation, Mortgage Rates

      B. The Santa Monica Ordinance, Short Term Rentals, May 12, 2015

      C. California Senate Bill 593, April 6, 2015

      D. Rental Revenue, Airbnb hosts, Los Angeles County, 2015

      References

      Qualifications of the Author

      art

      Foreword

      This treatise is prepared in response to questions raised by federal agencies, city planners and leading attorneys regarding the sharing economy and city ordinances which restrict short term rentals. The current high interest in short term rentals is the result of several factors:

      The substantial financial size and rapid growth of internet booking firms, such as Airbnb and HomeAway, and the subsequent major economic benefits to cities resulting from the multiplier effect of tourist and host expenditures.

      The unusually stringent terms of the Ordinance passed by the City of Santa Monica on May 12, 2015, which appears to violate fundamental law: California Constitution Article XIII C and U.S. Constitution Fifth Amendment Taking and Substantive Due Process. If a court determines that the Santa Monica restrictive ordinance overreaches, and is therefore deemed to be a taking of property rights, Santa Monica will incur the financial risk of being required to pay $207 million for just compensation to property owners.

      The Supreme Court decision, City of Los Angeles v. Patel, 135 S.Ct. 2443 (2015), which made void a long standing city ordinance which interfered with a fundamental right of the U.S. Constitution.

      The false economy of attempting to increase city tax revenue through lodging taxes, which results in lower tourism spending because tourists are sensitive to price. Thus, most of the lodging tax proceeds must be spent on increased tourist advertising, to offset the loss in tourism.

      The questionable decisions of the Santa Monica city council which raise issues of possible impropriety of campaign contributions and undue influence from hotel worker unions. Although the city council asserts concern for low-income rentals, the rental restrictions would cause over $5 million reduction in tax revenue, resulting in substantially lower funds available to fund land purchases for low income rentals.

      The Critical Issue—Overreaching

      A finder of fact could determine that the Santa Monica Ordinance goes too far, resulting in a clear violation of the Fifth Amendment Taking Clause and substantive due process guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. Property is a bundle of rights. The bundle of rights may be sliced and diced to the discretion of the owner, as shown by precise segregation of music rights which results in higher income for the owner.

      For real property, several centuries of English common law establish that a property owner has a fundamental right to rent without limitation as to duration, whether for 1 day, 30 days, or 99 years. Despite the lack of supporting evidence, city councils assert that short-term rentals cause disruption of neighborhood values. By contrast, the reality is that the environmental and neighborhood effect of a short-term rental guest is comparable to an ordinary visit from a friend or relative. The economic effect of short-term rentals is profound, with sharply higher income for owners, improvements to property, and increased local spending, the result is higher property values for the entire neighborhood and a more prosperous local economy.

      For example, in the Venice and Marina area of Los Angeles, an area with many short-term rentals, small homes that sold for $260,000 in 1999 are now selling for $1.2 million. The obvious benefit to the city is vigorous economic growth due to the multiplier effect of spending by the property owners, shopping and restaurant purchases by the international tourists, increase in sales tax income, and higher property tax income after each property is sold.

      Calling a home a de facto hotel does not make a home a hotel; calling a tail a leg does not make a dog have five legs. Mischaracterization is fraud. To the extent that city ordinances restrict short-term rental income the result is a Taking which requires Just Compensation by the city. The amount of the just compensation is the economic damages caused by the ordinance. For the May 12, 2015 Santa Monica ordinance, calculations demonstrate that the required compensation is $207 million.

      The wording of the Santa Monica ordinance, by criminalizing ordinary economic behavior, is properly classified as draconian, a harsh, unforgiving and severe law with heavy punishments for mere de minimus, de jure offenses.¹

      For centuries, a residence has protected status against government overreaching. The special status of a home is clearly stated in English Common Law:

      The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter-all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement!²

      Risk. The danger of government overreaching is shown by the subtle trend toward destruction of fundamental values from the inside, not from a foreign power. As described by Lincoln in his 1838 Lyceum Address which warned of disrespect for fundamental freedoms established by the U.S. Constitution:

      Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest, with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force take a drink from the Ohio or make a track on the Blue Ridge in a trial of a thousand years. At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer. If it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide. ³

      Excessive Government Regulation. In a free economy, the best solutions are derived from innovation, freedom from oppressive regulation, and incentives for continuous improvement in quality and performance. City governments, like the Italian city-states of the Machiavelli era, focused on increasing revenue from taxes and expanding their employment and influence. The result was continuous overreaching in unnecessary regulation of activities that should have been left very much alone.

      The historical example of excessive regulation is the United Kingdom Locomotive Act of 1865 (the Red Flag Act) which limited the speed of an automobile to only 4 mph, and required a man carrying a red flag to walk at least 60 yards in front of road vehicles when hauling multiple wagons.⁴

      Decline in Court Quality caused by Budget Cuts. The recent economic recession resulted in severe cuts in California court funding which has resulted in questionable court decisions which some now view as precedents. The minimal court budget is noted by the Chief Justice:

      Marking an annual budget clash between California’s courts and the other two branches of government, California Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye used her State of the Judiciary speech on Monday to once again urge Sacramento to augment funding for the judiciary. …As California sought to dig itself out of a deep fiscal hole during the recession, the court system was one recipient of wide-ranging budget cuts…. It’s not enough. We fall short, Cantil-Sakauye said, with consequences that include courthouse closures, reduced hours, and employees who are still, yes, on furlough. … "After having the judicial branch suffer over a billion

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1