|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1250313066
| 9781250313065
| 1250313066
| 4.09
| 963
| Jan 28, 2020
| Jan 28, 2020
|
it was amazing
|
None
|
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 31, 2023
|
Dec 31, 2023
|
Dec 31, 2023
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0393868265
| 9780393868265
| 0393868265
| 3.97
| 5,659
| Oct 2020
| Oct 05, 2021
|
really liked it
|
Fareed Zakaria does not have a crystal ball by which he views the future, but he does offer keen insight born of a global look and careful thought. Abo Fareed Zakaria does not have a crystal ball by which he views the future, but he does offer keen insight born of a global look and careful thought. About the author: Fareed Zakaria is the host of the CNN’s flagship international affairs show, Fareed Zakaria GPS, a weekly columnist for the Washington Post, and the best-selling author of The Post-American World and The Future of Freedom. He earned a bachelor’s degree from Yale University, a doctorate in political science from Harvard University, and has received numerous honorary degrees. The book in a sentence (or more): Zakaria contends that life post-Cold War settled into an international system marked by three forces, one geopolitical (American power), one economic (free markets), and one technological (the Information Revolution). That “stable” system is not unalterable. Three “asymmetric shocks—things that start out small but end up sending seismic waves around the world—have upset the calm: 9/11, the crash of 2008, and the coronavirus. (9) Global shockwaves are a part of living in a global community. 10 Lessons For A Post-Pandemic World is Zakaria’s attempt to understand the consequences of the pandemic for this international system in which we live. My quick take on 10 Lessons For A Post-Pandemic World: There is no denying the author’s grasp of world affairs and America’s challenges in them. Zakaria defies political labeling, but his views of the Trump administration’s handling of them are clearly negative. That said, this is not a book about Trump. It is one of the things I appreciate about Dr. Zakaria. Born in India, educated in the U.S., with a resume stuffed with high-level international assignments, Zakaria will take you across the globe, offering insight (well-researched insight, more than 70 pages of endnotes) and commentary from one who as an American citizen and enjoying the fruit of American hegemony, is not beholden or bowing to it. Overview and Analysis: With apologies in advance to the good doctor, here is my paltry summation of his 10 Lessons: Lesson 1: Buckle Up Our world system is open, fast, and unstable (see p. 14). Relentless change and increasing speed encourage greater risks. Zakaria notes antibiotic-resistant bacteria (a consequence of an attempt to “produce” 80 billion animals for world meat consumption), and diminishing topsoil coupled with decreasing water (a consequence of a growing agribusiness) are two challenges for a world moving at warp speed. We must not lose sight of prevention and preparation. We have built a super car without airbags and have given little thought to the horizon. Buckle up! Lessons 2: What Matters is Not the Quantity of Government but the Quality Zakaria (who is anti-big government) writes, “For many decades, the world needed to learn from America. But now America needs to learn from the world. And what it most needs to learn about is government—not big or small but good government.” (55) This was an interesting chapter. The author offered a brief history of good government. He acknowledged American exceptionalism while pointing out the challenges inherent in our anti-statist tradition. “America is, in its DNA, an anti-statist country. The Right comes at it by defunding government. The Left does it by encumbering it with so many rules and requirements that it has a similar dysfunctional effect.” (51) The Atlantic and Pacific coupled with our rich reserves and powerful military have shielded the U.S. “from the consequences of government that consistently executes badly.” (54) Humble up! Learn from other countries. Lesson 3: Markets Are Not Enough If any talk of socialism is the proverbial fingernails on the chalkboard, get some ear protection. This chapter may seem a contradiction to the last, but I don’t think so. His premise is that the free-market economy, as good as it is, favors the upper-income sector. America has rescued big companies (e.g. GM) and “yet calls to spend a few billion on preschool or low-income housing are repeatedly met with concerns about . . . giving people handouts.” (65) The pandemic revealed the inequity in American health care, the consequence of a pay-to-play society. Zakaria touts the social benefits of Denmark, but with taxes adding up to 45% of it’s GDP, no thank you. I would read this chapter with a copy of Thomas Sowell’s Discrimination and Disparities and Basic Economics by my side. Lesson 4: People Should Listen to the Experts—and Experts Should Listen to the People Zakaria pulls no punches here regarding President Trump’s handling of the coronavirus. He offers a smattering of praise and a heaping portion of criticism, essentially knocking (and with some good reason), the arrogance of Trump relative to the virus in general and responses from public health officials in particular. I would have loved for the author to apply the same criticism he did of Trump to alternative covid treatments (“I feel good about it”) to the current situation surrounding gender dysphoria. I was disappointed that he signaled out FOX as a partisan source of news, but did offer similar criticism regarding partisanship of other networks, including CNN and CNBC. While I appreciated his criticisms and cautions regarding the current wave of populism, I felt his dependence on “experts” because they have aced tests, graduated from “the best schools” (no explanation as to what makes them the best) and work in places that value excellence) was illogical. Bias ruins the ignorant and the informed. Lesson 5: Life Is Digital Digital is the new norm. Data is the new oil. But software is what gives data impact. Those that miss the technological trend (Kodak) are left behind. Technology has made a world interconnected. The pandemic only accelerated this shift, but not without drawbacks: Loss of jobs, loss of community, and loss of a bifurcated work/life balance. Artificial Intelligence (AI) gives concern to the rise of the machines. Do we really want the George Jetson lifestyle? The negative implications of digital mentioned above also include diminishing employment and purpose. Zakaria tips his worldview card here: “But if AI produces better answers than we can without revealing its logic, then we will be going back to our species’ childhood and relying on faith. We will worship artificial intelligence that, as was said of God, works in a mysterious way, his wonders to perform.” (118) His conclusion about a digital impact: A smartphone in my pocket may let me reach out and touch the world, “And yet, I have never mistaken it for a friend.” (121) Grow technologically, grow humanly. Lesson 6: Aristotle Was Right—We are Social Animals Cities can be a hotbed for virus spread, but they do not have to be. Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taipei all handled it well. In 1800, there just two cities with a least one million inhabitants; there were 371 by 2000, and projections point to more than 700 by 2030. Aristotle said, man is by nature a “social animal,” seeing cities as the places where the fullest experience of humanity takes place. “Humans create cities and cities make humans—these are two sides of the same coin.” (146) Covid-19 will not stop this. The American culture of independence will make it difficult to achieve the effectiveness of battling the pandemics of the future as well as more insular cultures, but we can and must learn to do so. People are social and the world continues to move toward the city. Lesson 7: Inequality Will Get Worse Pandemics should be equalizers as infectious diseases are “people blind,” but the income inequality gap between the rich and the poor indicates that is not the case. The poor were hit harder. Initially, under-developed countries were less effected by the virus initially, most likely due to distance and climate. But as the virus spread, it devastated poorer areas. Density and poor sanitation contributed to the spread. Zakaria identifies the inequality between rich and poor (see page 160), and bemoans the inequity of congressional tax breaks that favor the rich. He provides interesting statistics but fails to address any root cause of poverty other than poverty. Governmental responsibility is touted, but personal-responsibility is assumed. Income disparity is addressed, but not the family breakdown that contributes to it. Lesson 8: Globalization Is Not Dead Globalization—we are all connected. Writing of the pandemic and globalization, Zachary Karabell notes, “We are likely to find fresh confirmation of what we already know about globalization: that it’s easy to hate, convenient to target and impossible to stop.” (169) Globalization isn’t going away. The pandemic fuels cries for isolation-minded policies and high tariffs (and Trump is highly criticized here), but global interconnectedness touted early by Adam Smith and made more essential due to digitization and off-shore manufacturing is here to stay. Investments, goods, information, and people are constantly in world-wide motion. We need to harness it, not run from it, even as the U.S. and China vie as the dominant players on the world stage. Lesson 9: The World Is Becoming Bipolar The bi-polarity he describes is that between the U.S. and China as the world super powers, albeit America is the stronger economically and militarily and will be at least until 2060 (Zakaria’s latest projection). What makes it a bi-polar world is that the U.S. and China are so far ahead of their competitors. I found his discussion of “declinists” very intriguing. Samuel Huntington coined the world in response to cries of American decline. He cites five waves to which the author adds a sixth: (1) Soviet launch of Sputnik, (2) The 1960’s US quagmire in Vietnam, (3) Oil shock of 1973, (4) Watergate hangover and stagflation of the late 70s, (5) Rise of Japan in the late 80s (when Huntington wrote), (6) Iraq War, 2008 financial crisis, and Covid-19. For the first five, no matter the dire predictions, they never came true. America bounced back. Signs point to America’s continued strength due to its economic heft. The problem lies in “soft power,” its appeal and capacity to set the world agenda. That is in decline. How does that bode for America in the days ahead, with China more and more a global player with a desire for a global voice? Is a new Cold War with China inevitable? This was a very interesting chapter, especially as Zakaria got “into the weeds” on geo-political trade and economics. His conclusion: “Bipolarity is inevitable. A cold war is a choice.” (209) Lesson 10: Sometimes the Greatest Realists Are the Idealists The pandemic has separated nations that have enjoyed seventy-five years of relative peace into pockets of “cynics, contemptuous of the idealism that got us to where we are.” (211) “The United States was the most powerful country in the world when it built the UN and the web of associated international organizations, all of which constrained America’s unilateral power.” It acted very selflessly to create a stable global system, a system that is now being erased by cries of “America first.” America of the past helped construct a world system that was more equitable even as it faced opposition from the Soviet Union. A similar scene is being played out today, this time with China as the primary competitor, but our response has been more insular and unilateral under the Trump administration. Will America retreat, adopting an isolationist mindset, or will it work globally and cooperatively as the leading world player as it has in the past seven decades? “It is not a flight of fancy to believe that cooperation can change the world. It is common sense.” (233) A very interesting chapter. Conclusion: Nothing Is Written Fareed Zakaria closes his book with a nod to the film, Lawrence of Arabia. At two points in the film, the chief Arab leader, Sherif Ali (played by Omar Sharif) says of a future which appears bleak, “Nothing is written.” In other words, there are many futures in front of us. He quotes Otto von Bismarck, “The statesman’s task is to hear God’s footsteps marching through history, and to try and catch on to His coattails as He marches past.” (240). So it is our opportunity and challenge to take the opportunity in front us and forge a better post-pandemic world. The author piqued my curiosity about these books: Thucydides History of the Peloponnesian War McEwan, Ian, Machines Like Me Forster, E.M. The Machine Stops Words to ponder: 1. Conflict: War made the state and the state made war.” Charles Tilly in “Reflections on the History of European State-Making,” in The Formation of National States in Western Europe, edited by Charles Tilly (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975), 45. 2. Government: “Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.” Ronald Reagan 3. Understanding people: FDR was the most powerful man of his times. He also knew what it was like to feel powerless. A story (apocryphal?) captures his ability to connect with the common man. During FDR’s funeral procession, a mourner collapsed overcome with grief. Someone helped him up and asked why he was in such pain. Did he know the president? “No,” the man replied. “But he knew me.” (95) 4. The Enlightenment: “Man’s emergence from his self-imposed immaturity.” Immanuel Kant in “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?” (September 30, 1784), trans. Marcy C. Smith 5. Life and death At the end, regardless of whether you are white, dark, rich or poor, we all end up as skeletons.” The Skull of Morbid Cholera: Jose Guadalupe Posada, La calavera del colera morbvo (1910, accessed via Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/picurws/item/9961... 6. On America: We are America; we are the indispensable nation. We stand tall and we see further than other countries into the future.” Madeline Albright (202) 7. Statesman’s Task: The statesman’s task is to hear God’s footsteps marching through history, and to try and catch on to His coattails as He marches past.” Otto von Bismarck – A slightly different formulation of this Bismarckian dictum was offered by Henry Kissinger in “Otto von Bismarck: Master Statesman,” New York Times, March 31, 2011. Summary Review: My summary is just that, a brief review of three-hundred well-researched pages and consequently, is subject to the omissions of clarity brevity can bring. Zakaria’s grasp of the world stage is impressive. He raises insightful questions. Draws impressive conclusions. His research is solid. He consistently argues against the disparity between the haves and have not’s. There is much to ponder here, but I was left tasting a demand for the fruit of American exceptionalism for all, without addressing the corresponding root of American exceptionalism that rewards it to some, i.e. hard work and a lifetime of sacrifice. Sadly, that was missing. In a couple of places, I felt statistics were cherry-picked to back a presupposition, rather than deliver a convincing proof. As all worldviews are not the same, neither are economic philosophies. He gave us one that tended to a narrative of inequity of distribution rather than an equal distribution of sacrifice. Despite my disappointment in places, I will continue to read Fareed Zakaria. He is a brilliant observer of world affairs. Our worldviews differs, but not our interest in or concern for the world. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 27, 2022
|
Oct 28, 2022
|
Oct 27, 2022
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1626540853
| 9781626540859
| 1626540853
| 3.98
| 222
| 1964
| Apr 08, 2015
|
really liked it
|
This is a book about the importance of renewal for both societies and individuals – and the interdependence between the two to accomplish it. Tell me m This is a book about the importance of renewal for both societies and individuals – and the interdependence between the two to accomplish it. Tell me more . . . Societal renewal (think government, education, race relations, international affairs), hinges on a creative society, which itself hinges on the capability of individuals to move from apathy to self-renewal. What sounds simple is complicated by entropy, the slowing pace that invariably occurs in societies, organizations, and individuals as they age. Gardner writes, “[V]itality diminishes, flexibility gives way to rigidity, creativity fades and there is a loss of capacity to meet challenges from unexpected directions” (5). Shocks to the system (think wars, disasters, pandemics, loss of a job) often unlock “new resources of vitality.” How to continually initiate renewal apart from these external prompts is the secret and subject of this book. About the authors: John W. Gardner (1912-2002) held many high-level leadership posts, including Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare under President Lyndon B. Johnson. His book, On Leadership, is one of the finest I have ever read on that subject. Gardner was an academic, activist, WWII veteran, and an astute reflective practitioner. My take on Self-Renewal: The Individual and the Innovative Society Gardner is the master of reflective analysis. Self-Renewal is insightful, challenging, and so applicable to me, especially as it relates to academic leadership. While the book is fifty-years old, I think it is as fresh and applicable as the day he wrote it. I appreciate the way Gardner demonstrates the inter-relatedness of personal and societal renewal. In a day of the preoccupation with the self, Gardner point higher than just “self-leadership.” Pick it up. Take your time. Get ready to make a few notations . . . and probably some life adjustments. My favorite quote: “The renewal of societies and organizations can go forward only if someone cares. Apathy and low motivations are the most widely noted characteristics of a downward path. Apathetic men accomplish nothing. Men who believe in nothing change nothing for the better. They renew nothing and heal no one, least of all themselves. Anyone who understands our situation at all knows that we are in little danger of failing though lack of material strength. If we falter, it will be a failure of heart and spirit.” xv Overview: Self-Renewal Gardner divides his thoughts his thoughts into twelve brief chapters. He examines the cycle of “growth, decay and renewal” as well as the factors that contribute to or diminish from societal and personal renewal. Chapters include: “Innovation,” “Obstacles To Renewal,” “Tyranny Without A Tyrant,” “Individuality And Its Limits,” “Commitment And Meaning,” and “Moral Decay And Renewal.” My book is highlighted and underlined. I have notes for personal application scrawled throughout this work. I found his words about innovation and organizations especially helpful. My takeaways from Self-Renewal: 1. Self-renewal hinges on continual self-assessment: “Exploration of the full range of his own potentialities is not something that the self-renewing man leaves to the chances of life. It is something he pursues systematically, or at least avidly, to the end of his days.” 11 2. Educators must develop life-long learners: The ultimate goal of the educational system is to shift to the individual the burden of pursuing his own education. This will not be a widely shared pursuit until we get over our odd conviction that education is what goes on in school buildings and nowhere else. . . . The world is an incomparable classroom, and life is a memorable teacher for those who aren’t afraid of her.” 12 3. Have the courage to fail: “We pay a heavy price for our fear of failure. . . . There is no learning with some difficulty and fumbling. If you want to keep on learning, you must keep on risking failure—all your life. It’s as simple as that. When Max Planck was awarded the Nobel Prize he said: Looking back . . . over the long and labyrinthine path which finally led to the discover [of the quantum theory], I am vividly reminded of Goethe’s saying that men will always be making mistakes as long as they are striving after something. 154. Live in generalist/specialist tension: Societal growth necessitates specialists who help us achieve what we could not on our own (transportation, medicine, engineering, etc), which in turn fosters compartmentalism, which can diminish individual versatility. “Note, it is not a question of doing away with the specialist. It is a question of retaining some capacity to function as a generalist, and the capacity to shift to new specialties as circumstances require.” Individual versatility is a priceless asset in a world of change. 24-25 5. Cultivate fresh thinking: "We tend to think of innovators as those who contribute to a new way of doing things. But many far-reaching changes have been touched off by those who contributed to a new way of thinking about things." 30 I read this against the backdrop of an educational partnership that was on the verge of collapsing. Collaborative “fresh thinking” is part of what God used to re-build it. Today it is flourishing. 6. Creativity is a path to innovation. Recognize it. Foster it: Gardner highlights four “traits of creatives.” I list them here, with a few additional notes, but the pages (32-39) are a good read. Creatives exhibit: (1) Openness: A receptivity to current experiences; (2) Independence: Creatives are “independent but not adrift.” They see the gap between what is and what could be, which requires a certain level of detachment. While such independent detachment may garner criticism, the creative ignore that type of criticism; (3) Flexibility: Creatives with “play with an idea,” “try it on for size.” Related to flexibility, creatives have a tolerance for ambiguity. The creative “is not uncomfortable in the presence of unanswered questions or unresolved differences.” 38 (4) Capacity to Find Order in Experience: Creatives impose order on their experience. I found this sentence fascinating: “Every great creative performance since the initial one has been in some measure a bringing of order out of chaos.” (39). Zeal, hard work, and arduous application is what it takes and what creatives give. 7. Identify signs of self-interest that form an obstacle to renewal: “In colleges and universities many of the regulations regarding required courses which are defended on highly intellectual grounds are also powerfully buttressed by the career interests of the faculty members involved in those courses. Vested interests can lead to rigidity, rigidity to defensiveness, and defensiveness to resistance and diminished capacity for change. 52-53 8. The importance of fostering a free society: But it is by means of the free society that men keep themselves free. If men wish to remain free, they had better look to the health, the vigor, the viability of their free society—and to its capacity for renewal. 66 9. The necessity of order for freedom: These words stood in sharp contrast to vandalism, looting, and riots in protest to the killing of George Floyd: “[C]onceptions of freedom that are not linked to conceptions of order are extremely disintegrative of the social fabric. There can be order without freedom, but no freedom without some measure of order.” 70-71 10. Educational administrators must apply the same rules of innovation toward their own university structure that they guarantee their professors: “ Much innovation goes on at any first-rate university—but it is almost never conscious innovation in the structure or practices of the university itself. University people love to innovate away from home .” 76 Conclusion: As noted at the outset, I appreciate the insights of John Gardner. His observations are those of the informed reflective practitioner. Gardner recognizes the capacity (tendency?) of SELF-renewal to slide toward egocentricity. Even as he encourages the self-renewing man to do “something about which he cares deeply,” he recognizes such SELF-renewal can lead to self-centeredness. He writes, “And if he is to escape the prison of the self, it must be something not essentially egocentric in nature.” 17 One must be intentional about this work of self-renewal: “Exploration of the full range of his own personalities is not something that the self-renewing man leaves to the chances of life. It is something he pursues systematically, or at least avidly, to the end of his days. 11 He continues that them in chapter 9, “Individuality and Its Limits. We must combat those aspects of modern society that threaten the individual’s integrity as a free and moral responsible being. But at the same time we must help the individual to re-establish a meaningful relationship with a larger context of purposes.It is just this kind of level-headedness, the kind born of years and reflective experience, that makes Self-Renewal an important book for his generation and ours. In his concluding chapter, Gardner urges his readers to charge students not to stand watch over ancient values, but to continuously re-create those values in their own day. 126 As with the rest of his work, he is urging conscientious action over inaction; advancement as the antidote to entropy. Gardner is no Pollyanna, he advocates neither “uncritical optimism” (“The house of delusions is cheap to build but drafty to live in” A. E. Housman) or “corrosive melancholy.” But . . . a certain buoyancy is absolutely essential. 113 Why? Because society is not a wind-up machine sustained with a few twists, but one continuously re-created “for good or ill, by it’s members.” 127 Gardner wants us to lock arms with the cohort bent on continuous renewal. Quotes worth examining: 1. On intractable people: The most stubborn protector of his own vested interest is the man who has lost the capacity for self-renewal. 10. 2. On educating for renewal: “All too often we are giving our young people cut flowers when we should be teaching them to grow their own plants. We are stuffing their heads with the products of earlier innovation rather than teaching them to innovate.” Are we approaching their minds as storehouses to fill or instruments to be used? 21-22 3. On change: So stubborn are the defenses of a mature society against change that shock treatment is often required to bring about renewal. . . . Someone has said that the last act of a dying organization is to get out a new and enlarged edition of the rule book. 44-45 The new thing will usually look barbarous compared to the old. 49 4. On creativity: "Creative minds are seldom tidy." 49 5. On tyranny and renewal: A state which dwarfs its men . . . will find that with small men no great thing can be accomplished. John Stuart Mill, On Liberty. Gardner adds: “We need only add that no new thing can be accomplished, no renewing thing, no revitalizing thing.” 54 6. On peer conformity: The Image Managers encourage the individual to fashion himself into a smooth coin, negotiable in any market. 58 7. On freedom and renewal: We are in bondage to the law in order that we may be free. Cicero, The Speeches of Cicero, Men of intemperate minds cannot be free; their passions forge their fetters. Edmund Burke 8. On protecting dissenters as a condition of renewal: Emerson said of the scholar: “Let him not quit his belief that a popgun is a popgun, through the ancient and honorable of the earth affirm that it be a crack of doom.” Ralph W. Emerson, "The American Scholar," An Oration Delivered before the Phi Beta Kappa Society at Cambridge, 1837 (page 74 in the book) 9. On individuality: “. . . if I were to desire an inscription for my tombstone, I should desire none other than “That individual.” S. Kierkegaard, “That Individual”: Two “Notes” Concerning My Work as an Author, 1859. (In Soren Kierkegaard, The Point of View, Walter Lowrie (trans) [Oxford University Press, 1939], p. 115.) 10. On happiness, virtue and hard work: The storybook conception tells of desires fulfilled; the truer version involves striving toward meaningful goals—goals that relate the individual to the larger context of purposes. Storybook happiness involves a bland idleness; the truer conception involves seeking and purposeful effort. About that effort he quotes Montaigne: “Virtue will have naught to do with ease. It seeks a rough and thorny path.” 11. On calling: Every calling is great when greatly pursued.” Oliver Wendell Holmes. About this Gardner writes, "One my not quite accept Holmes’ dictum – but the grain of truth is there." 104 The author piqued my curiosity about these books: Escape from Freedom, by Erich Fromm. Fromm examined why Nazi and Fascist movements of the 1930’s found it so easy to win adherents. He noted that the person who submits willingly to an authoritarian regime relieves himself of the anxieties and responsibilities of individual autonomy. 91-92 True Believer, by Eric Hoffer explored the same thesis. The American Scholar, by Ralph Waldo Emerson ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 20, 2022
|
Aug 18, 2022
|
Jul 20, 2022
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1501199447
| 9781501199448
| 1501199447
| 4.23
| 871
| unknown
| Aug 03, 2021
|
it was amazing
|
Inequity and personal responsibility clash in Josh Mitchell's The Debt Trap: How Student Loans Became A National Catastrophe. Josh Mitchell, a reporte Inequity and personal responsibility clash in Josh Mitchell's The Debt Trap: How Student Loans Became A National Catastrophe. Josh Mitchell, a reporter for the Wall Street Journal, takes us on an important journey. Mitchell traces the history of student loans from visionaries Lyndon Johnson and Carl Elliott (1957 - 1969) through seven historical phases in order to understand the financial catastrophe cascading down to the present (2016-2018). Along the way we meet Sallie Mae, Al Lord and Ed Fox (the two biggest architects of the student loan industry), discover how Presidents, Democrat and Republican, fostered the debt crisis by enabling colleges to "raise their prices with abandon," and we hear the stories of those strangled by mounting student debt. The Debt Trap is history, economics, higher education, racial and social inequities, and politics. What it is not is a treatise on personal responsibility. Despite beginning and ending on Lyndon Johnson's dual values of personal responsibility and education, I felt Mitchell mostly neglected the former, though his treatment of the latter was exceptional. As a college President, education and student loans are the stuff of daily life. When Mitchell pegs the student loan system as a national catastrophe, he is not uttering hyperbole. Today, 43 million people owe $1.6 trillion in student debt, an amount that has tripled since 2006. Americans owe more in student debt than they owe in credit card debt and car loans (3)As a parent of six, however, all of whom attended college on their own dime -- and none of whom were straddled by debt -- I was disappointed that discussions of personal responsibility were mostly neglected. For example, in Chapter 8, "State U In" (a fascinating chapter!), Mitchell recounts the sad tale of Thomas. Thomas graduated from the University of Alabama with $153,000 of debt. Sadly, he was barred from walking in commencement due to an outstanding bill of $2,800, a travesty in an institution whose football coach enjoys the highest salary in the nation ($9.75 million per year) and whose average faculty pay of $152,000 a year makes it a darling of higher education. Thomas' story is a travesty. However . . . Thomas had cheaper options than Alabama. He could have gone to a state school in Florida for a lot less [because he was a Florida resident]. But he was responding to incentives built into the student loan system--and so was Alabama (181).Was Thomas a "victim of the system?" Yes, I think he was. Could the system have served him better? Absolutely, and it should have. Is Thomas off the hook? No. There were other options. He chose not to take them. That is on him. Neither Thomas nor most borrowers are asking for a handout. They are, however, asking for help. And my personal diatribe aside, Josh Mitchell gives us six recommendations to provide such help: 1. Forgive interest on student loans. Attempting to scale the ever-growing mountain of debt, many borrowers see no hope of ever paying it off. They don't want them forgiven, but they do want a shot at paying them off. Forgiving interest would help. 2. Make four-year schools put up their own money. This was Lyndon Johnson's original vision. With financial skin in the game, institutions would be more careful, thinking twice before giving away cash willy-nilly. 3. Make community college truly free: Mitchell does not support four years of free college for political and practical reasons. He is, however, a proponent of making a year or two of community college free so students can test the educational waters. 4. Revise the idea of the American Dream to respect and reward alternatives to the four-year degree, particularly apprenticeships. The research is clear: "Apprenticeship programs are effective at getting students well-paid jobs" (218). 5. The government should stop subsidizing grad school. Mitchell explains a number of financial educational products, among them Grad Plus, which he charges with being the most dysfunctional. Eliminating it would drive down graduate education and cause students to think twice before tackling the master's degree. 6. States, cities, and communities should step up. Mitchell cites Kalamazoo, Michigan, where wealthy philanthropists invested in the education of their own citizens.In the balance of this review, I'll share some of my highlights ("Amen to that!"), recount a few shocking details I picked up reading The Debt Trap, and end with three considerations for the institution I lead, Lancaster Bible College | Capital Seminary & Graduate School. My recommendation: If you have been to college, work at a college, have a student who will one day go to college, are concerned about higher education in America or national economics, read this book. Josh Mitchell gives us a splendid history and analysis of student loan debt. But he doesn't stop there. He offers us alternatives to improve the financial system that makes higher education possible for millions. In doing so he moves us toward better education and personal responsibility for it. Amen to that! 1. How institutions CAN help level the playing field: Don Lively opened Florida Coastal School of Law in 1996, in part, to serve Black and Hispanic students normally passed over by schools obsessed with moving up in national rankings: Lively believed the practice deepened racial inequality. Those with the highest LSAT scores were predominantly white students who grew up in privilege. Law schools had "this perspective that certain people aren't cut out for this--they can't do it," Lively says. "They can do it if as an institution you're willing to make the commitment to enable them to catch up with those persons that have a more privileged heritage and background life experience" (150).While I disagree with the "disadvantaged" premise which fails to account for personal responsibility, Lively makes a great point! By 2004, 80% of Florida Coastal graduates who sat for the state bar exam passed; the second highest success rate in Florida (154). 2. What online educators must do to help ensure student success: Reflecting on Florida Coastal's later failures, Lively notes: "It was the school's responsibility to provide help to those students--tutoring, mentoring, intensive one-on-one instruction--to ensure they succeeded. "The whole system broke down," Lively says in retrospect. "We weren't ready to deliver on a scaled basis. To be successful at this level, you've got to have a really strong academic support program. And we haven't built up our academic support program to a level that would enable us to deliver those things that we were convinced we could deliver" (163).3. Educational loans, a "moral hazard." "Studies show that the more an activity is insured, the more people take risks" (44). Lenders with a 100% federal guarantee to cover the debt will lend money more carelessly. 4. The shaky foundation of the twin pillars of the American Dream: Sallie Mae (student loans), as well as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (mortgage market) "infused banks with cheap money in the name of helping poor and middle class Americans build wealth." These twin pillars of the American Dream are inextricably linked to debt (93). A few shocking details: 1. College loan defaults: By 2016, 3,000 people defaulted on a student loan every day (190). 2. Rise of student loan debt in America: Student loan debt nearly tripled from 2007, to $1.4 trillion (200). 3. Political pickles: Grad Plus (a debt multiplier) was born in the Bush 43 administration (177-18). The Obama administration leveraged student loan interest to help fund the Affordable Care Act (133). 4. Big BIG Debt! In 1990 (adjusting for inflation), only 2 percent of all borrowers had balances in excess of $50,000. In 2014 there were 5 million borrowers with student loan debt in excess of $50,000 (71% percent of all student loan borrowers) (192-93). 5. Student loan bankruptcy: It is near impossible to declare bankruptcy due to student loan debt. Authorities can call repeatedly, garnish wages, tax refunds, even Social Security checks (199). 6. Did you know? Prior to his rise to the presidency, Barack Obama was carrying student loan debt until a book deal "wiped his financial slate clean" (205). 7. Student loans and taxpayer liability: Private lenders lost about $535 billion in subprime mortgages when the housing market crashed. Taxpayers are on the hook for $500 billion in unpaid student loans (7, 208). 8. How bad is it? Between 1980 and 1990, all consumer prices rose 62%. Typical family earnings rose 68%. One Year at a private college rose 145%. Public college rose: 113% (76). What can LBC do? 1. Perform a student debt analysis. What is our student default rate? Why? 2. Ensure the quality of our global education student success process by determining and consistently assessing system measures. 3. Study University of Alabama's model for recruiting students (c.f. p. 167). 5. Help student borrowers to assess their ability to repay student loan debt. 6. Ask the President's Cabinet to read The Debt Trap. Take a half-day to discuss implications. Make The Debt Trap required reading for financial aid, admissions, and student services. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 08, 2021
|
Nov 27, 2021
|
Nov 08, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0190864656
| 9780190864651
| 0190864656
| 4.05
| 547
| Jul 02, 2018
| Aug 02, 2018
|
it was amazing
|
If I were to re-read two books whose pages captured my mind in 2021, The Year Of Our Lord 1943: Christian Humanism in an Age of Crisis would be one of
If I were to re-read two books whose pages captured my mind in 2021, The Year Of Our Lord 1943: Christian Humanism in an Age of Crisis would be one of them. Why? This book stretched me. Published in 2018, The Year Of Our Lord 1943 introduced me to Christian intellectuals of the 20th century I did not know (Jacques Maritain, W.H. Auden, and Simone Weil) and helped me get better acquainted with others I did (T.S. Eliot, C.S. Lewis). I had to put my thinking hat on! The Year Of Our Lord 1943 was not a "quick write" for the author; it was not a "quick read" for me. This book reiterated the importance of familiarity with the past to avoid the pitfalls of the present. Masterfully, as only a scholar can, Alan Jacobs demonstrates ties between what his "intellectual five" saw in the war-torn year of 1943, and the implications for post-war Western democracy. More importantly, Jacob clarifies the implications for us today: the implications for twenty-first century education, human rights, and the role Christians and Christianity can (should?) play in society. There are 250 pages of references to writers, their times, their works, and why those works matter then and now. Drawing on one or two to demonstrate Jacobs's ability draw a line between past and present is challenging, but here goes. On January 15, 1943, W.H. Auden gave a lecture entitled, "Vocation and Society," in which he encouraged students to be wise, not just to become wise to graduate cum laude. Remember, the year is 1943 and Auden is setting the necessity of vocation against the impossibility of such in state-controlled fascism. Jacobs writes: Auden's vision, then, is of a vocation-based education sustained by a democratic polity, and a democratic polity sustained by Christian faith. The vision stood (as did Maritain's in Education at the Crossroad, as did Lewis's in The Abolition of Man against the commanding power of the nation-state, against pragmatism, against modern technocratic canons of efficiency--against Weil's Social Beast (click here for more on Jacobs and Weil's Social Beast(148).In chapter 6, Jacobs draws on Jacques Maritain, Lewis, and Weil encouraging educators to recognize that their warnings about "the cultural collapse of Europe" apply today, not for fear of repeating the same mistakes (Ecclesiastes 3:9 applies), "but because they may well commit others that arise from the very different but equally heedless momentum of their society" (129). That is, what Americans need to learn from Europe’s catastrophe is the danger of failing to cultivate intellectual and spiritual aspirations beyond what one's every day culture encourages. In Europe, what had primarily impeded genuine education was a false and ultimately poisonous model of group identity -- as manifested, for instance, in the belief in an intrinsically “German physics“ that had led the Nazi regime to expel most of its Jewish scientists. In America, the chief impediment to genuine education was technocratic pragmatism. Both paths led, in their different ways, to the death of deep education and therefore, ultimately, to the death of genuine human culture (129).This book helps quell the urge toward sweeping generalizations. Reading Jacobs is to be reminded that "it's a little more complicated than that." He examines the works of five thinkers in one year and from their disparate lives demonstrates the threads of unified thought and warning. Masterful! Recommendation: Any temptation I have to give The Year Of Our Lord 1943: Christian Humanism In An Age Of Crisis less than five stars stems from my unwillingness to think deeply, process carefully, evaluate consistently, and apply fairly. As I have noted, this was a hard read, not because it was poorly written but because Jacobs took me places I have not been before to listen to thinkers I have not heard before and forced me to grapple with ideas I have not processed before. Now to figure out when I am going to once again crack open this book, take a deep breath, and dive in a second time! ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
May 10, 2021
|
Nov 17, 2021
|
May 10, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0736981799
| 9780736981798
| 0736981799
| 4.43
| 1,622
| 2020
| Nov 03, 2020
|
it was amazing
|
Someone has said, "a Christianity without courage is cultural atheism." If so, what does it mean to respond "courageously" to cultural assaults levele
Someone has said, "a Christianity without courage is cultural atheism." If so, what does it mean to respond "courageously" to cultural assaults leveled against Christianity and Christians? Erwin Lutzer provides a thorough and level-headed answer in We Will Not Be Silenced. Christianity is both all-encompassing and highly exclusive. Jesus tells us to love our neighbors without exception (that message "sells") and he declares himself as the "only way to God" (that message... not so popular). It is those exclusivity points that culture finds irksome, these days especially in matters of sexuality, gender, and marriage. And then there is that issue of Christianity's place as shaper of culture. Debates aside as to whether America is or ever was a "Christian nation," Western civilization in general and America in particular owe much to the followers of Jesus. However, as Mark Sayers explains in Disappearing Church, our present post-Christian culture wants what Christianity has brought (justice, peace, fairness, and equality) without the King who brings them. He writes: Post-Christianity is not pre-Christianity; rather post-Christianity attempts to move beyond Christianity whilst simultaneously feasting upon its fruit (p. 15).When kingdoms clash, difficulties follow. Christians get that. Jesus never promised his followers a walk on Easy Street. He said, "in this world you will have trouble" (John 16:33). The Apostle Paul adds, "all who want to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted (2 Timothy 3:12), and Peter voices his "amen" when he writes, "don’t be surprised when the fiery ordeal comes among you to test you" (1 Peter 4:12). Of course matters are made complicated when certain historical failures in America, e.g. slavery, Jim Crow, and civil-rights, were at times perpetuated and defended by Christians, many even using the Bible to validate their attitudes and actions. And while many believers have been champions of abolition and equal-treatment under the law, without a doubt, some Christians have not helped the cause. These failures have left a stain on the reputation of Christ followers. Stains are one thing; attacks, marginalization, and culture-cancelling quite another. How should Christians respond when they see their cultural influence wane, history re-written, and cultural norms turned upside down? Does "faithful presence" mean standing idly by while the foundation brought by Christianity is being upended? If judgmentalism and angry reactionary protests are not the answer, what is? Silence is not working. When Paul's life was threatened, he exercised his right as a citizen of Rome and said, "I appeal to Caesar" (Acts 25:11). In We Will Not Be Silenced: Responding Courageously to Our Culture's Assault on Christianity, Erwin Lutzer helps readers with that "appeal." He identifies the challenges, traces their roots, and brings clarity to volatile issues today, issues such as Critical Race Theory (CRT), gender upheaval, the destruction of the nuclear family. He doesn't shy away from topics which, while not foundational to Christianity, have certainly benefited from it, i.e. democracy and capitalism. In doing so he helps Christians move from placards to a solid cultural polemic, one that is historical, critical, and biblical. When it comes to how to address and change the cultural landscape, hope is not a strategy. Neither is silence. Lutzer helps. We Will Not Be Silenced provides the kind of careful analysis, counter-argument, and winsome approach necessary to respond. I highly recommend it. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 24, 2021
|
Nov 18, 2021
|
Apr 24, 2021
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1125267860
| 9781125267868
| B001MW154U
| 0.00
| 0
| unknown
| Jan 01, 1953
|
None
|
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 2024
|
not set
|
Mar 27, 2021
|
Hardcover
| ||||||||||||||||
0394527771
| 9780394527772
| 0394527771
| 4.02
| 6,878
| 1984
| 1984
|
it was amazing
|
Wicked Popes, abusive power, and wooden heads. One finds them all in The March of Folly, the fascinating historical critique by two-time Pulitzer Priz
Wicked Popes, abusive power, and wooden heads. One finds them all in The March of Folly, the fascinating historical critique by two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning historian, Barbara W. Tuchman (1912-1989). Tuchman devotes page after page to highlight the governmental devotion to folly that permeates history: A phenomenon noticeable throughout history regardless of place or period is the pursuit by governments of policies contrary to their own interests. Mankind, it seems, makes a poorer performance of government than of almost any other human activity. In this sphere, wisdom, which may be defined as the exercise of judgment acting on experience, common sense and available information, is less operative and more frustrated than it should be (4).Tuchman will demonstrate how nations repeatedly pursue policies contrary to their best interest. Foolishly, willingly, and bewilderingly they take in the proverbial Trojan horse. And it is the Trojan Horse that Tuchman offers as the prototype of misguided government action. Why would anyone welcome within their walls that which could be a trap without first assessing the danger, considering the consequences, and exploring alternatives. This is foolishness of the highest magnitude. This is pursuing a policy contrary to self-interest. And this pursuit of folly is the sad tale of history. The author is not alone in her assessment of governmental incompetence. She quotes John Adams, our second President, who said, Government is at a stand; little better practiced now than three or four thousand years ago (5).She also quotes a historian’s blistering critique of Philip II of Spain, No experience of the failure of his policy could shake his belief in its essential excellence (7).Tuchman tells us that misgovernment is of four kinds: 1. Tyranny or oppression (of which there are so many examples she need not cite one). 2. Excessive ambition (think Germany in WWI and WWII) 3. Incompetence or decadence (think the Roman Empire) 4. Folly or perversity (pursuing policies contrary to self-interest) The March of Folly is concerned with the last. After identifying folly as the pursuit of policy contrary to self-interest and providing the Trojans taking in the wooden horse as a prototype of this folly, she traces this pursuit of folly in three historical moments: 1. The Renaissance Popes Provoke the Protestant Secession (1470-1530) “The folly of the popes was not pursuit of counter-productive policy so much as rejection of any steady or coherent policy either political or religious that would have improved their situation or arrested the rising discontent. Disregard of the movements and sentiments developing around them was a primary folly. They were deaf to disaffection, blind to the alternative ideas it gave rise to, blandly impervious to challenge, unconcerned by the dismay at their misconduct and the rising wrath at their misgovernment, fixed in refusal to change, almost stupidly stubborn in maintaining a corrupt existing system. They could not change it because they were part of it, grew out of it, depended on it (125). Three attitudes mark the papacy at this time: (1) Obliviousness to the growing disaffection of constituents, (2) Primacy of self-aggrandizement, (3) Illusion of invulnerable status. Each are persistent aspects of folly. While bred in the Renaissance popes and exaggerated by the surrounding culture, each of the three are independent of time and recurrent in governorship (126). 2. The British Lose America: Tuchman comments that "although possession [of the colonies] was of greater value than principle, nevertheless the greater was thrown away for the less, the unworkable pursued at the sacrifice of the possible. This phenomenon is one of the commonest of government follies" (128). She cites Benjamin Franklin who, in condemning the Stamp Act of Great Britain, said, “they cannot compel a man to take stamps who chooses to do without them. They will not find a rebellion; they may indeed make one.” Tuchman said, "That could stand as Britain’s epitaph for the decade" (164). 3. America Betrays Herself in Vietnam: One insight and incident can stand as the primary exhibit of American folly in Vietnam. In December, 1946, French General Leclerc, was the commander in Vietnam. After surveying the situation, he said, “It would take 500,000 men to do it (tame North Vietnam) and even then it could not be done.” Tuchman writes, “In one sentence he laid out the future, and his estimate would still be valid when 500,000 American soldiers were actually in the field two decades later (244, 347). What generates such foolishness on the part of government? The answer in one word, "character." Character again was fate.Those four words summarize the message the author wishes to convey, for folly marches most forcefully where when character is absent (370). The absence of character breeds terrible consequences. Tuchman concludes the book reflecting on folly's mark on America: “What America lost in Vietnam was, to put it in one word, virtue” (374).Brilliant summations: The author showcases a biting wit and keen ability to provide cogent and sometimes devastating summaries: On wooden-headedness:Tuchman comes back to this appellation time and again. "Wooden-headedness consists in assessing a situation in terms of preconceive fixed notions while ignoring or rejecting any contrary signs. It is acting according to wish while not allowing oneself to be deflected by the facts. It is epitomized in a historian's statement about Philip II of Spain, the surpassing wooden-head of all sovereigns: “No experience of the failure of his policy could shake his belief in its essential excellence” (7). On Clement VII, 1523-34: Supreme office, like sudden disaster, often reveals the man, and revealed Clement as less adequate than expected (120). On Great Britain’s intractability: “Strong prejudices in an ill-formed mind are hazardous to government, and when combined with a position of power even more so” (138). On Great Britain’s ignoring of the political warning signs that spelled trouble from America: “But the fate of warning in political affairs it to be futile when the recipient wished to believe otherwise” (199). On Johnson’s need for power: “Johnson felt he had to be 'strong,' . . . He did not feel a comparable impulse to be wise; to examine options before he spoke" (311). About the domino theory of the day: If Vietnam fell to communism, then other nations in Southeast Asia would topple to it like dominoes. She comments: “Minds at the top were locked in the vise of 1954—that Ho was an agent of world Communism . . ." On Johnson and truth that ideas have (sometimes devastating) consequences: Like Kennedy, Johnson believed that to lose South Vietnam would be to lose the White House. It would “shatter my Presidency, kill my Administration, and damage our democracy.” It would begin WWIII. He was as sure of this “as nearly anyone can be certain of anything.” No one is so sure of his premises as the man who knows too little” (319). On Johnson’s refusal to listen to his advisors: “But minds at the top were locked in the vice of 1954 . . .” On Kennedy’s inability to understand the times: “Here was a classic case of seeing the truth and acting without reference to it” (287). On Kennedy: Kennedy was an operator of quick intelligence and strong ambition who stated many elevated principles convincingly, eloquently, even passionately, while his actions did not always match” (284). Quotes & Notes To Ponder: Burke, Edmund: The utility of “perseverance in absurdity is more than I could ever discern" (290). Burke" Show the thing you contend for to be reason, show it to be common sense, show it to be the means of attaining some useful end, and then I am content to allow it what dignity you please” (363). Character: "Flee, we are in the hands of a wolf.” Giovanni de’ Medici when hearing of Rodrigo Borgia’s elevation to the Papacy (75). Cold war orthodoxy: Vietnam was the “cornerstone of the free world in Southeast Asia, the keystone of the arch, the finger in the dike" (283). Common sense: “A faculty that has a hard time surviving in high office” (358). Decay of government: "The deterioration of every government begins with the decay of the principles on which it was founded” (Montesquieu, 18th Century, 340). Earl of Sandwich: The Earl of Sandwich, a two-time Lord of the Admiralty, was “hearty, good-humored and corrupt” using his positions in the Navy to pad his own pockets. “So addicted to gambling that, sparing no time for meals, he would slap a slice of meat between two slices of bread to eat while gambling, thus bequeathing his name to the indispensable edible artifact of the Western world” (144). Folly: “Know my son, how little wisdom the world is governed.” The dying conclusion of Count Axel Oxenstierna, Chancellor of Sweden Folly: “Folly, in one of its aspects, is the obstinate attachment to a disserviceable goal” (96). A prime example is Pope Julius, who pursued his aims with “absolute disregard of obstacles” but in total disregard for the church (see pages 96-97). Folly: “Emotionalism is always a contributory source of folly.” Great Britain treated the colonies like recalcitrant children, not the maturing nation it was becoming (see page 187). Folly: “Insistence on a rooted notion regardless of contrary evidence is the source of the self-deception that characterizes folly” (209, see also 224). Folly: Seeing the truth and acting without reference to it (287). Tuchman's comment about Kennedy who saw the French treat Indochina as "a white man's war" but did not see his own engagement in that way. Kennedy said if the war in Indochina were ever “converted into a white man’s war” we would lose it as the French lost it (287). Founding Fathers: “The most remarkable generation of public men in the history of the United States or perhaps of any other nation” (Arthur M. Schlesinger, 18). Powerful summary: "We are now married to failure." Galbraith on Vietnam, 1961-2 Government: “While all other sciences have advanced, government is at a stand; little better practiced now than three or four thousand years ago” (John Adams, 5) Government: “Mankind, it seems, makes a poorer performance of government that of almost any other human activity” (Barbara Tuchman, 4). She also said, “Wisdom in government is still an arrow that remains, however rarely used, in the human quiver” (33). John Adams on British national pride: “The pride and vanity of that nation is a disease; it is a delirium; it has been flattered and inflamed so long by themselves and others that it perverts everything” (229). LBJ and Nixon: Both presidents won by huge majorities, ironically, only to topple shortly afterwards (371). Power: “You may exert power over, but you can never govern an unwilling people.” Governor Thomas Pownall to British leaders, speaking from seven years of experience of living in the American colonies (183). Power: Lust for power is “the most flagrant of all the passions.” (Tacitus, 381). Vietnam: Vietnam was the first domino in the widely held theory that if American support fell, Vietnam would disintegrate, and “the front against Communism would give way in Indochina just when it faced a new threat elsewhere” (275). Vietnam (a starting date for America's official presence): When the US established MACV (Military Assistance Command Vietnam), 1962. (298). Wooden-headedness: "No one is so sure of his premises as the man who knows too little." (and I would add, "think he knows enough"). The worst acts of wooden-headedness coming from the Renaissance Popes of the 15th and 16th centuries (54). Where does The March of Folly land on The Bacon Scale? Sir Francis Bacon said, "Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested" (The Essays). The March of Folly is a book to be chewed and digested. Savor the meal. It should be noted that Tuchman approaches her subject from a perspective void of God. “In the search for meaning we must not forget that the gods (or God), for that matter are a concept of the human mind; they are the creatures of man, not vice versa. They are needed and invented to give meaning and purpose to the puzzle that is life of earth . . . .” (45-46). The author’s approach differs markedly from a biblical perspective, “the Most High rules the kingdom of men and gives it to whom he will and sets over it the lowliest of men” (Daniel 4:17, ESV). That important point aside, her analysis is insightful and timely for her day and ours. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 27, 2021
|
Apr 16, 2021
|
Mar 27, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
B08SBRL5ZP
| 4.50
| 26
| unknown
| Jan 05, 2021
|
it was amazing
|
Chuck Bentley is the friend who tells you what you need to hear, not what you want to hear. In Seven Gray Swans: Trends That Threaten Our Financial Fu
Chuck Bentley is the friend who tells you what you need to hear, not what you want to hear. In Seven Gray Swans: Trends That Threaten Our Financial Future Chuck helps us navigate these troubling trends (gray swans) so we are better able to live as the wise whom Solomon commends with these words: A prudent person foresees danger and takes precautions. The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences.Chuck is the CEO of Crown Financial Ministries, a global enterprise advancing God's principles of stewardship and life. He is also the founder and executive director of the Christian Economic Forum. Set against the backdrop of a world pandemic, Chuck shares seven trends he sees as "gray swans." Black swans and gray swans A black swan is "something we do not see coming and for which we cannot be prepared" (think the global pandemic) (6). A gray swan is a "potentially very significant event that is considered unlikely to happen but is still possible." To put another way, a gray swan is an obvious danger that we tend to ignore. There are two essential characteristics of a gray swan: (1) They are avoidable, (2) They are ignored. The Seven Gray Swans Chuck Bentley wants to encourage us to think about -- and take action -- with respect to the seven gray swans he sees on the horizon: 1. Universal basic income: While it goes by many names (citizen's income, basic income guarantee, guaranteed annual income), at its root "It is regular income paid to everyone without any conditions. Everyone would automatically receive a regular income paid into their bank accounts" (14). Here, as throughout the book, Bentley examines the rationale for the swan, it's likelihood, what God has to say about it, and precautions to take. 2. Digital Currency/Electronic Economy: Is a cashless future inevitable? Given that 30% of transactions occur with cash, Harvard Business Review thinks the cashless society is unlikely. Still, trends point to the favorable outlook on "cashless" here in the U.S. and around the world. The sacrifice of privacy, the possible use of biometric IDs, and the idea of the government being in control of all citizen money is concerning. 3. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT): Bentley contends "Modern Monetary Theory may be (or should be)_ the top concern on may of our radars' right now" (31). In MMT, the issuing government acts as the bank (think Monopoly), which is not limited to supply. If you can print it, you have it. Deficits don't matter since government prints money to pay its debts and uses taxes to control the supply for inflation. Bentley points to Dr. Stephanie Kelton as the most identifiable champion of MMT. While the government may not be espousing MMT, it is certainly acting in line with MMT, as President Biden has proposed eight trillion in new spending in just 2 1/2 months. Bentley notes that "orthodox economic thinking says that the danger zone for any government is reaching 130% of debt-to-GDP. The U.S. is currently at that place and on pace to exceed it. The author devotes considerable pages in this small book to this which he sees as a significant problem. 4. American Democratic Socialism: So what is it? Democratic Socialism is "a political philosophy supporting political democracy within a socially-owned economy." It is championed by Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who see this as a favorable alternative to free-market capitalism, the historic bedrock of American monetary operations. Bentley corrects the contention that Jesus was a socialist. He also quotes Milton Friedman, "The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither. The society that puts freedom before equality with end up with a great measure of both." I appreciate his treatment of this subject, examining it biblically as well as politically and economically. It is careful, critical, and helpful. 5. Social Scoring: One need look no further than Twitter, Facebook, Apple, and Google and the cloud they wield relative to "blocking" or "canceling" accounts to understand the essence of social scoring. Bentley points out that China prevented 2.56 million people from purchasing plane tickets in 2019 due to their social credit rating. It can -- and is -- happening in the U.S. For example, New York State Department of Financial Services has approved that life insurance companies can determine premiums based on one's social media posts. 6. Biometric Identification: Fingerprint passwords, facial recognition, retina scans . . . . "Law enforcement agencies, banks, airports, hotels, doctors' offices, travel agencies, and more are collecting records linking everyone to the identity of his/her face, iris, or fingerprint" (67). 7. Fragile Networks: Can someone say, "Ransomware"? Brilliant hackers utilizing malicious software, or malware to prevent one from accessing his/her computer files, systems, or networks is a daily reality. You pay or you don't play. The networks upon which we depend daily (computer, electric, mobile) are not foolproof or bug-proof or completely hack-proof. What does that mean for you and me? Bentley has thoughts about Tesla, Cloud storage, Mobile networks and more. He offers practical steps to protect one's digital assets: (1) strong passwords, (2) utilize two-factor authentication, (3) be wise to phishing attacks, (4) keep physical backups, (5) Keep software updated and security settings turned on. Chuck Bentley is not an alarmist or extremist. He is a realist. He sees the signs and asks: "What does God say?" How should be we evaluating this particular trend? What steps should we take? While he is not a prognosticator, he does prescribe careful evaluation and appropriate precautions. This is not Chicken Little warning of a falling sky, but a 21st century Solomon telling us to look carefully and take appropriate action. Bentley concludes with these words from John Stonestreet of Prison Fellowship: "Ideas have consequences. Bad ideas have victims" (92). Gray swans will always be present. Christians don't run from them but face them by examining them carefully, evaluating them biblically, and taking careful steps to ensure you are seeing the danger and taking appropriate precaution, while always resting in the fact that God turns it all to good. Seven Gray Swans: Trends That Threaten Our Financial Future is a little book (110 pages) with a big impact. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 18, 2021
|
Mar 20, 2021
|
Mar 18, 2021
|
Kindle Edition
| |||||||||||||||||
0684864630
| 9780684864631
| 0684864630
| 4.38
| 3,043
| 1999
| Feb 05, 2002
|
it was amazing
|
Happily, many are waving the banner of social justice today. That means inequities are revealed, addressed, and corrected. Sadly, many champions of so
Happily, many are waving the banner of social justice today. That means inequities are revealed, addressed, and corrected. Sadly, many champions of social equality are confusing social justice with cosmic justice. That misunderstanding means injustice sometimes reigns as justice (true equality be damned), social visions are cloaked in tyrannical power, and "the principles of the American constitution quietly repealed" (167). Thomas Sowell wants to correct that misunderstanding. Dr. Sowell is an esteemed economist and senior fellow at Standford’s Hoover Institution. He is universally praised for what Judge Robert H. Bork has called "his distinctive combination of erudition, analytical power, and uncommon sense." Thinking, as G.K. Chesterton has said, is “connecting things.” In The Quest For Cosmic Justice, Thomas Sowell wants us to connect how individuals and groups turn their lofty visions of cosmic justice (the way the world should be — "according to them") into a “social justice” which seeks to right the wrongs of select groups, e.g. “the poor.” Sowell leaves no doubt as to his thesis: General principles, such as “justice“ or “equality," are often passionately invoked in the course of arguing about the issues of the day, but such terms usually go undefined and unexamined. Often, much more could be gained by scrutinizing what we ourselves mean by such notions than by trying to convince or overwhelm others. If we understood what we were really saying, in many cases we might not say it or, if we did, we might have a better chance of making our reasons understood by those who disagree with us (p. vii).The Quest for Cosmic Justice is comprised of four essays Sowell wrote over a period of years. As already noted, these essays connect his thoughts on the damage done when individuals or groups confuse cosmic justice with social justice. Essay 1 -- "The Quest for Cosmic Justice" is intended to move us from "the heady rush of rhetoric" to a more careful examination of what actually lays under the mountain of words of those who champion social justice. In short, we must not advocate for justice until we "specify just what conception of justice we have in mine" (3). Essay 2 -- "The Mirage of Equality" addresses that illusive concept we call equality. Equality is a mirage because the world is not equal. Geography favors farming in some areas over others. Rivers that facilitate travel and economic prosperity are not equally distributed by region. Age brings benefits in life experience. It also provides opportunities to save year over year that are not afforded to the young. Physical prowess coupled with effort over time means life on the basketball court will never be equal. Performance when understood as the payoff for hard work over time means financial and societal "inequalities." Yet many visions of equality ignore these differences and champion equal rewards without equal effort or results. Such crusades are often accompanied by the subtle moral superiority of those who champion them. Essay 3 -- "The Tyranny of Visions" demonstrates how social visions are championed as ideological dogma void of testing. He writes, "The more sweeping the vision--the more it seems to explain and the more its explanation is emotionally satisfying--the more reason there is for its devotees to safeguard it against the vagaries of facts. . . . Much of the history of the twentieth century has been a history of the tyranny of visions as dogmas" (100, 131). Essay 4 -- "The Quiet Repeal of the American Revolution" helps us see that when ideological crusades (whether from Presidents, Congress, or Judges) trump constitutional government, problems ensue. When the rule of law (people being treated equally under the law) is superseded by an ideological vision (people receive equally under the law), when ideological bias reins, the principles of the American constitution will be (and are being) quietly repealed (189). There is so much to appreciate about The Quest for Cosmic Justice. It is a book for all time, especially for our time as visions apart from definitions lead to destruction of the social order they propose to enhance. Sowell emphasizes: 1. Different visions of what is just lead to radically different practical policies (47). 2. Different visions apart from definitions mean we will continually talk past each other. Apart from defining "justice," individual or group ideals of “cosmic justice” will necessarily change the meaning of “justice” and “social justice.” 3. Ideological proponents of "social justice" must separate heady feelings of what is “right” with “the costs and dangers of the actual alternatives” of these visions. Some of my "Lessons learned": 1. Define justice: A heart for social justice, apart from a definition of justice, is only going to lead to injustice. This is my understanding of how Sowell uses these terms: Cosmic justice: The world as it ought to be "from my perspective" enforced under the banner of "social justice" which due to it's unequal emphasis actually becomes anti-social justice; Traditional justice: Ensuring "due process" under the law. Social justice: Rectifying undeserved disadvantages for select groups"(see On My Walk Episode #173). 2. Look deeper: Sowell's work on analyzing the statistics on which cosmic visions are based is a lesson on looking deeper. He highlights the pitfalls of creating statistical abstractions. For example, when describing "the poor." Statistical abstractions are not people. The poor are not a static group as most rise out of "poverty" and most "rich" do not remain in the upper ten-percent of all income. Many of the often derogatorily tagged "rich" are rich because they have lived longer, experienced more, worked longer, and saved longer. Worth remembering: 1. Milton Friedman: A society that puts equality – in the sense of equality of outcome – ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the hands of people who use it to promote their own interests. 2. On governmental expansion: In politics, the great non sequitur of our time is that (1) things are not right and that (2) the government should make them right. Where right all too often means cosmic justice, trying to set things right means writing a blank check for a never-ending expansion of government power (186). 3. On freedom: As many have warned in the past, freedom is unlikely to be lost all at once and openly. It is far more likely to be eroded away, bit by bit, amid glittering promises and expressions of noble ideals. Thus, hard-earned freedoms for which many have fought and died have now been bought and sold for words or money, or both (184). 4. On inequalities: Why are different groups so disproportionately represented in so many times and places? Perhaps the simplest answer is that there was no reason to have expected them to be statistically similar in the first place. Geographical, historical, demographic, cultural, and other variables make the vision of an even or random distribution of groups one without foundation (37). 5. On governmental monetary authority: To allow any governmental authority to determine how much money individuals shall be permitted to receive from other individuals produces not only a distortion of the economic processes by undermining incentives for efficiency, it is more fundamentally a monumental concentration of political power which reduces everyone to the level of a client of politicians (73). 6. On social visions as envy: Ideological crusades in the name of equality promote envy, the principle victims of which are those doing the envying (77). 7. On social equity: There has now been created a world in which the success of others is a grievance, rather than an example. Irrational as such ideological indulgences may be, they are virtually inevitable when equality becomes the social touchstone, for equality can be achieved only by either divorcing performance from reward or by producing equal performances (94). 8. On the rich and poor: Perhaps no vision underlies more social and economic theories than the vision of the rich robbing the poor, whether in a given society or among nations (119). The problem comes when a quest for cosmic justice extrapolates an entire class of people from statistics, which when examined more closely, actually disproves the vision of those using them. But because they take the moral high ground of their cosmic vision, “evidence to the contrary is not only likely to be dismissed, but is often blamed on the malevolence or dishonesty of those who present such evidence.” 9. On presumptions: Towering presumptions . . . are increasingly mass-produced in our schools and colleges by the educational vogue of encouraging immature and inexperienced students to sit in emotional judgment on the complex evolution of whole ages an of vast civilizations (149). 10. On governmental power: It may easily be seen that almost all the able and ambitious members of a democratic community will labor unceasingly to extend the powers of government, because they all hope at some time or other to wield those powers themselves (Alexis de Tocqueville, 151). A biblical perspective: I think The Quest for Cosmic Justice hits a nerve because we live in a larger story of justice corrupted and justice being restored. In that sense the quest for cosmic justice is written in our hearts by the Creator who is just, made the world to function justly, and who provided the solution to human injustice in Christ Jesus. Christ will ultimately right all wrongs in his return. In that sense, God's certain quest for cosmic justice will be his reign of justice over the universe (c.f. Colossians 1:15-17; Revelation 4-5; 7:9-10; 19:11-21; 20-21). Where does The Quest for Cosmic Justice" land on The Bacon Scale? Sir Francis Bacon said, "Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested" (The Essays). The Quest for Cosmic Justice is the kind of book to be chewed and digested S-L-O-W-L-Y. Savor this book. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 02, 2021
|
Mar 13, 2021
|
Mar 02, 2021
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1433556332
| 9781433556333
| 1433556332
| 4.57
| 5,287
| 2020
| Nov 10, 2020
|
it was amazing
|
Dear Dr. Trueman, would you make this book required reading for every member of Congress? G.K. Chesterton said, "Thinking means connecting things." In Dear Dr. Trueman, would you make this book required reading for every member of Congress? G.K. Chesterton said, "Thinking means connecting things." In The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self: Cultural Amnesia, Expressive Individualism, and the Road to Sexual Revolution, Carl Trueman connects today's SOGI politics to its philosophical roots, from the works of "Rousseau through the Romantics to Freud and then to the New Left." 384 Grab a cup of coffee. Get comfortable. This book is going to take awhile to read. And it is worth it! Trueman contends the rise of identity politics "are a symptom or manifestation of the deeper revolution in selfhood that the rise and triumph of expressive individualism represents." p. 355 He writes: Transgenderism is a symptom, not a cause. It is not the reason why gender categories are now so confused; it is rather a function of a world in which the collapse of metaphysics and of stable discourse has created such chaos that not even the most basic of binaries, that between male and female, can any longer lay claim to meaningful objective status. And the roots of this pathology lie deep within the intellectual traditions of the West. 376As Richard Weaver told us in his 1948 work by the same title, ideas have consequences. And it is those ideas that Trueman wants us to see. My purpose throughout has been to show how ideas that today permeate both the conscious philosophies and the intuitions that dominate the social imaginary have deep historical roots. p. 339What I realized in reading Trueman is that the deep-seated emotivism that drives the sexual revolution makes discussions about philosophical differences nearly impossible. For example, oppositional appeals to my congressmen about the Equality Act based a historical heterosexual norm, classic definitions of marriage, or law rooted in a Judeo-Christian tradition are likely to fall on deaf ears when the basis for right and wrong shift from the permanence of law to the psychology of self. That is not to say, "Don't make the appeal," but to recognize the challenge of civil discussion when the cultural norms change. Trueman introduces the reader to the philosopher Charles Taylor. Taylor shows us two ways people think about the world: mimesis and poiesis. A mimetic view regards the world as having a given order and a given meaning and thus sees human beings as required to discover that meaning and conform themselves to it. Poiesis, by way of contrast, sees the world as so much raw material out of which meaning and purpose can be created by the individual. p. 39The reason it is increasingly difficult to carry on an ideological conversation is that the social imaginary of our day is poietic. Feelings trump objective truth. In fact, feelings are fact. Appeals to reason are dismissed as a part of a history of societal oppression. The maltreatment? Traditional views of binary gender distinction (male and female) and normative views of heterosexual relationship. The modern mind sees these ideas as oppressive. They must be condemned and cast off. "Deathwork" is the name Philip Rieff gives to the way a group seeks to undermine and destroy established cultural norms and tear down the traditional moral structure of society. The LGBT+ community is engaged in facilitating that deathwork, an effort certainly made more likely with the passage of the Equality Act. Hence, as Trueman notes: The LGBT+ alliance represents the latest and most powerful example of an anticulture, a deathwork, and a rejection of nature, underpinned by the aesthetic and emotive ethics that are so typical of a therapeutic age. p. 340LGBTQ+ while representing differing perspectives relative to gender identity (and even disagreeing and contradicting one another) connect as victims of society's oppressive heterosexual norms (p. 355). As a group they wield significant influence. As Trueman repeatedly points out, transgenderism (the "T" of the LGBTQ+ equation) is not so much the problem today as it is a symptom of a cultural ethic that has made the jump from mimesis to poiesis. That said, not every normative-defying group is on board with the transgender movement. Many feminists are not signing on. To them, simply declaring, "I am a woman trapped in a man's body" diminishes the place of women in history. As Germain Greer notes, "The pain, the struggle, and the history of oppression that shape what it means to be a woman in society are thus trivialized" (p. 360). Greer adds, "If uterus-and-ovaries transplants were made mandatory of wannabe women they would disappear overnight." p. 361 Holdouts notwithstanding, as Trueman's title suggests, the self-affirming sexualized modern self is on the ascendancy. How Trueman divides his work: The Rise And Triumph of the Modern Self is divided into four parts. In Part 1, Trueman examines the architecture of this sexual revolution. He shows us the reimagined self and culture. Part 2 is a deep dive into the ideological forces that have shaped what we are now experiencing. Trueman expertly traces the works of Rousseau, Wordsworth, Shelley, and Blake, as well as the impact of Nietzsche, Marx, and Darwin. Remember Chesterton? He said, "Thinking is connecting things." Trueman's connections are interesting and compelling. In Part 3, Trueman discusses Freud and the sexualization of the revolution. While Freud's theories are dismissed, culture has latched on to his fixation with all things erotic. Part 4, "Triumphs of the Revolution" points out how society's love affair with the erotic in art and culture is "symptomatic part of a larger cultural whole" (p. 380). Individualism, the psychologized view of reality, therapeutic ideals, cultural amnesia, and the pansexuality of our day must be understood -- and can only be understood -- in the broader context. His "Concluding Unscientific Prologue" is a fitting end to his work. I gleaned a lot from The Rise And Triumph of the Modern Self. Here are a few items: 1. From mimesis to poiesis: Charles Taylor's construct is helpful as a broad ontological overview. 2. Psychology trumps biology: The reality of the body is not as real as the convictions of the mind. p. 369 3.Feelings trump reason: Trueman's subtitle includes the words "expressive individualism." This is a note he plays throughout the book while also demonstrating the historical basis for this shift. 4. Goodbye nuclear family: "What nature declares impossible--two people of the same sex can conceive a child--technology has made possible, and "the sexual revolution has then made imperative." p. 372 5. LGBTQ+ is a disparate and conflicting group united against "ideological and political enemies":The groups are disparate in that "T" denies the male-female binary the "L" and "G" embrace. The oppressors are a hetrological society whose biggest proponent has been religious groups, the most notorious "evil" being Christians. 6. It's not all bad: I appreciate how Trueman shows how all of us (yes, even Christians who oppose transgenderism) are expressive individualists. Consider your denominational choice, or social media account. He also acknowledges how the modern self's emphasis on human dignity is a perspective with which Christians agree. 7. But it's pretty bad: The reason for gloomy look is the basis for dignity is polar opposite. Christians base human dignity in that all humans are made in the image of God. This, he notes, was the driving force of the civil rights movement in the 50s and 60s. The premise of human dignity of expressive individualism, however, rests on human dignity detatched from any human or divine order. As Trueman notes, what we are left with is "a kind of totalitarian anarchy." p. 287 8. The Founding Fathers ideas of religious freedom and freedom of speech are out of step with the current social imaginary. When one's religious beliefs or patterns of speech "oppress" those whose identity is based in a selfhood void of a metaphysical construct, and that is the pervading view, it can only be a matter of time before such "rights" become wrongs. 9. Christian inconsistency: Christians cannot decry Obergefell and simply wink at no-fault divorce. It's inconsistent. The two are related. 10. Philip Rieff's "The Modern West as a Third-World Culture": See pages 74ff. So good and helpful for understanding why it is difficult to enter civil discourse today. A Sobering Conclusion: Trueman notes, "The long-term implications of this revolution are significant, for no culture or society that has had to justify itself by itself has every maintained itself for any length of time. Such always involves cultural entropy..." p. 381 The triumph of the modern self is a triumph of psychology over theology, of "I feel" over "thus saith the LORD." It is Judges 21:25, "Everyone did what was right in his own eyes." The result was chaos and captivity. Should we expect a different outcome? Reason For Hope: Trueman points Christians to the Christian community and to the second-century where he see parallels to the challenges of our day. The church's existence as a close-knit, doctrinally bounded community provides a foundation to live consistently with faithfulness to Christ and as a light that makes a difference today and prepares for a better tomorrow. The Rise And Triumph Of The Modern Self: Cultural Amnesia, Expressive Individualism, and the Road to Sexual Revolution is not an easy read, but it is an exceptionally good read. Carl Trueman is helping me make sense of these volatile times and chart a way through them. I highly recommend this book. _____ Notes: "Thinking means connecting things" from Twelve Types (Norfolk, VA.: IHS Press, 2003), 28) ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 13, 2021
|
Feb 27, 2021
|
Feb 13, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1684510317
| 9781684510313
| 1684510317
| 4.14
| 11,961
| Jun 30, 2020
| Jun 30, 2020
|
it was amazing
|
Sometimes a thimble of common sense needs a truckload of research to get our attention. Such is the case with Abigail Shrier's stellar work on the tra
Sometimes a thimble of common sense needs a truckload of research to get our attention. Such is the case with Abigail Shrier's stellar work on the transgender movement. Shrier wrote Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters to address the sudden rise in gender dysphoria and the corresponding rise in transgenderism among adolescent females. She asks: For the first time in medical history, natal girls are not only present among those so identifying--they constitute the majority. Why? What happened? How did an age group that had always been the minority of those afflicted (adolescents) come to form the majority? Perhaps more significantly--why did the sex ratio flip: from overwhelmingly boys, to majority girls? p. xxiIrreversible Damage is her answer to those questions. Shrier receives praise and condemnation for her work. So far she has not been cancelled by Amazon as was the case with Ryan T. Anderson's 2018 work, When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement . Let's hope that is not the case, as her work is marked by clear writing, a compelling case, a journalist attention to detail, and the common-sense-wisdom of a mother, which she is. 5 Things Irreversible Damage Does: 1. Irreversible Damageprovides the reader with 250 pages of cogent argumentation that pushes back on the cultural phenom and gender dysphoria sweeping our nation. It is a life-altering I-R-R-E-V-E-R-S-I-B-L-E assault on adolescent girls. 2. Irreversible Damage raises common sense questions and answers them with solid research. As one of her interviewees (a desister) asks: "If somebody has anorexia, the first move is not to put a feeding tube down their throat. But why is it for trans, the first move when somebody has dysphoria is to be like, 'You need hormones'" (193). Shrier tackles this question and more. Early on she notes: Between 2009 and 2017, the number of high schoolers who contemplated suicide increased 25 percent. The number of teens diagnosed with clinical depression grew 37 percent between 2005 and 2014. And worst hit--experiencing depression at a rate of three times that of boys--were teenage girls.Irreversible Damage asks, "Why the change?" What is behind it? Why do parents try to act like BFFs instead of parents? Why do transgender YouTube prophets have such a strong pull on this demographic? What does the research say? It asks the questions and offers answers backed by research, personal testimony, and common sense wisdom. 3. Irreversible Damage provides startling facts that raise concerns about the national transgender narrative: Here are just a few eye-openers: ** In the last decade, adolescent gender dysphoria has increased by over 1,000 percent. ** In 2016, natal females accounted for 46% of all sex reassignment surgeries in the U.S. A year later it was70%. ** It is against the law in California to "opt out" state-wide SOGI instruction. ** I Am Jazz teaches kindergartners that they may have a "girl brain in a boy body." ** The policy of the National Education Association and many public schools (CA, JN, NJ) is that when a trans-identified student "comes out" at school, the parents not be informed (74). ** One leaked report in the UK showed that rates of self-harm and suicidality did not decrease even after puberty suppression for adolescent natal girls (118). ** In the entire history of gender dysphoria there is no record -- dating back to 1910 -- of transgenderism passing from one person to another (as it so often does from YouTube prophets). 4. Irreversible Damage covers a broad spectrum of of topics related to the growing gender dysphoria and transgenderism among adolescents: The girls, the shrinks, the schools, the influencers (think YouTube prophets), the regret, the way back, and more. 5. Irreversible Damageexhibits caring empathy: Shrier is not on an angry crusade. She is by words and tone in the book highly sensitive and kind to those in the trans community. Four things that may shock you: 1. What minors can do without a therapist's consent: "In 2012, WPATH altered its standards to permit even minors to receive hormone treatment on the basis of "informed consent," meaning that neither diagnosis of gender dysphoria nor therapist's note would be required" (178). 2. The change in adolescents: In 1994, 74% of 17-year-olds had a "special romantic relationship in the previous 18 months. In 2014, when the Pew Research Center asked seventeen-year-olds whether they had 'ever dated, hooked up with or otherwise had a romantic relationship with another person'--seemingly a broader category than the earlier one--only 46 percent said yes. "And yet many of the teens, having never had a romantic relationship, are deciding they are transgender" (23). 3. Rise in gender surgeries: "Between 2016 and 2017 the number of gender surgeries for natal females in the U.S. quadrupled, with biological women suddenly accounting for . . 70 percent of all gender surgeries. In 2018, the UK reported a 4,4000 percent rise over the previous decade in the teenage girls seeking treatments" (26). 4. Ease of access to testosterone and surgery: Gender treatments to help make the "transition" to the other sex such as receiving testosterone (a Schedule III substance), "top surgery" (mastectomy), and phalloplasty can all be obtained without therapist's note (180). Conclusions: 1. Kids don't know who they are. Despite the sacred doctrine of transgenderism, kids are kids. Can a adolescent girl who has yet to have a period and lives among an influential and often soul-diminishing culture (think Mean Girls), be trusted to know what's best? Abigail Shrier is one of the few people who will say, "Of course they don't. They are girls!" She writes, "As I spoke to [those with regrets over their decision], I wondered how much easier things might have been if--instead of turning to their iPhones--they had gone to the mall together and pierced their ears or smoked a cigarette" (202-03). I agree. Just google "girls, Beatles, concert" and look at the images. How many of you would tell them in a moment of hysteria that they know what is best? Yet our society is making it a crime in some places to disagree with their adolescent conclusions. Our society is allowing these young girls to get Testosterone treatments that after a few months permanently alter their bodies. Our society is enshrining in legal precedent that 2. "Our kids need us for a reality check.": As Shrier wraps up her work, she quotes the founder of 4thWaveNow. Our kids "need us for a reality check, which is also why I don't think parents should go all the way down the road to doing whatever the kid want, Like, 'Oh, yes, that's fine. The pronouns, the male name.' I think you have to find your own limits through" (211-12). 3. Shrier's "7 Conclusions" are gold: I wont' identify these because I want to encourage you to buy and read this book, and apart from reading the book, I don't think one has enough context to appropriately interpret what she says and why. But I do want to pull a portion of #6, "Stop Pathologizing Girlhood" because I believe it displays her level-headedness as well as her womanly and motherly insights that accompany her brilliance as a journalist. A woman's emotional life is her strength. A key task of her adolescence must be to learn not to let it overwhelm her. A key task of maturity is to learn not to let it fade away (217).It is that kind of thinking that contributes to a five-star review and another shout out to "BUY THIS BOOK!" 4. Try not to get riled by the transgender activist. Shrier's point is a good one, but often forgotten in the heat of a frustrating moment of warding off an incoming activist attack: "It's important to remember that activists are the most extreme members of any group" (220). Activists are the ideological flag wavers, ground takers, mind captors, social bullies, and political generals. Love them anyway! 5. When the craze subsides, it is going to be an attorney's field day. Shrier writes, "Each of the desisters and detransitioners I talked to reported being 100 percent certain that they were definitely trans--until, suddenly, they weren't (italics mine). Nearly all of them blame the adults in their lives, especially the medical professionals, for encouraging and facilitating their transition" (202). Glossary: These terms are used in Irreversible Damage. Some are drawn from the book. Others from online sources. Cisgender: Identifying as having a gender that corresponds to the sex one has been assigned at birth; not transgender. Demisexual: Only experiencing sexual attraction after making a strong emotional connection with a specific person. Desister: Those who determine they are not transgender after all. Detransitioner: One who seeks to transition back to his/her biological birth gender. GSA:> The Gay Straight Alliance, a pro-LGBTQ+ group with chapters on high school campuses across the nation. Metoidioplasty: Metoidioplasty, metaoidioplasty, or metaidoioplasty (informally called a meto or meta) is a female-to-male sex reassignment surgery, a type of lower surgery that involves forming genital tissue, including the clitoris, into a penis. Non-binary: Someone whose gender identity isn't exclusively male or female. Orchiectomy: Testicle removal surgery so a man can better transition to a female. Pansexual: Open to sexual activity of many kinds. Phalloplasty: The construction of a penis. Puberty blockers: Drugs that interrupt the body's natural growth and development. Queer: Queer is an umbrella term for sexual and gender minorities who are not heterosexual or are not cisgender. Top surgery: A double mastectomy as gender surgery to help the trans individual cross over. Two spirit: Two-spirit is a third gender found in some Native American cultures, often involving birth-assigned men or women taking on the identities and roles of the opposite sex. Transgender: Identifying as or having undergone medical treatment to become a member of the opposite sex. Toxic: The label applied to individuals, be they parents or friends, who refuse to acknowledge an individual as "trans." Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters is a clarifying resource for a confusing time. I highly recommend it. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 07, 2021
|
Feb 13, 2021
|
Feb 07, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1586171399
| 9781586171391
| 1586171399
| 4.26
| 351
| Mar 31, 2006
| Apr 01, 2006
|
it was amazing
|
If you want humor, read the comics. If you want history, grab a biography. If you want critique, read the critics. If you want theology, open your Bib
If you want humor, read the comics. If you want history, grab a biography. If you want critique, read the critics. If you want theology, open your Bible. If you want philosophy, consult the sages. If you want them all, read Chesterton. Dale Ahlquist, President of the American Chesterton Society, shows us Chesterton and his brilliance in Common Sense 101: Lessons From G.K. Chesterton. In many ways this is a primer on Chesterton -- not so much on his life (although we do get a sense of the man) -- rather, Chesterton the thinker, the literary critic, the man who cast a spell of joy, who believed in "promiscuous charity," whose trade was words, and whose greatest weapon was the the pen attached to his brilliant mind. The brilliance of this book is the thoroughness with which Dale Ahlquist is acquainted with G.K. Chesterton; Chesterton the Catholic, the thinker, the novelist, the art and literary critic, the man of the world, that is the world governed by God. Quotes I reference below surface in the chapters which are a collection of the eclectic topics Chesterton addressed: Riddles of God, words, education, history, courage, puritans and pagans, feminism, science, the Catholic faith, and his marriage (to name a few). The latter subject -- and what Ahlquist reveals about Chesterton's views -- is worth the price of the book (see "Moments Filled With Eternity). This book made me want to read more Chesterton than I have, especially to dig into the Father Brown series and open the pages of my copy of Chesterton's biography of Dickens. This is not a book to be hurried and the time devoted to it will reap benefits far in excess of the price you pay in time and money. The book draws its title in part from the chapter, "Recovering the Lost Art of Common Sense." Chesterton said, "The first effect of not believing in God, is that you lose your common sense. p. 265Ahlquist writes, "That means that in order for us to recover our common sense, we have to recover our faith" (p. 265). His chapter, "Recovering The Lost Art Of Common Sense" points us in that direction as it summarizes ten fundamental truths Chesterton believed. Reading this book and being exposed to those truths may not restore your faith, but it will certainly put you on the right path, and in traveling that path it will provide a healthy dose of common sense in large part because it will point you to Christ and to the Church. The quotable Chesterton: I will limit myself to a few quotes, but one should pick up this book for all the others I didn’t share. Perhaps, more importantly, for the context surrounding them which makes Chesterton's words the more prescient. 1. All evil began with some attempt at superiority. p. 16 2. An adventure is only an inconvenience rightly considered. An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered. . . . p. 20 3. When asked, "If you were stranded on a desert island with only one book, what book would you want it to be?" Chesterton quipped: "Thomas' guide to practical shipbuilding." p. 23 4. The one perfectly divine thing, the one glimpse of God's paradise on earth, is to fight a losing battle -- and not lose it. p. 25 5. The world will never lack want of wonders; but only for want of wonder. p. 27 6. Astonishment at the universe is not mysticism but it transcendental common sense. p. 38 7. Monogamy is romantic; it just happens to be merely practical, but “if ever monogamy is abandoned in practice, it will linger in legend and in literature. p. 41 8. In reference to Job, “The riddles of God are more satisfying than the solutions of man." p. 43 9. The self is more distant than any star. p.45 10. The mere pursuit of health always leads to something unhealthy. p. 45 11. On Jack the Giant-Killer, and paradox of courage and danger, "He can only get away from death by continually stepping within an inch of it. A soldier surrounded by enemies, if he has to cut his way out, needs to combined a strong desire for living with a strange carelessness about dying. p. 46 12. Also about paradox and the riddles of life: There is no way out of danger except the dangerous way. p. 47 13. Thinking means connecting things. p. 48 14. The worshiper never feels taller than when he bows. p. 52 15. A small artist is content with art; a great artist is content with nothing except everything. p. 61 16. Philosophy is always present in a work of art. p. 61 17. On love, "You cannot love a thing without wanting to fight for it. You cannot fight without something to fight for. To love a thing without wishing to fight for it is not love at all; it is lust." p. 63 18. We do not need a censorship of the press. We have a censorship by the press. p. 69 19. The higher critics are wholly deficient in the highest form of criticism, which is self-criticism. p. 79 20. The one thing that is never taught by any chance in the atmosphere of public schools is this: that there is a whole truth of things, and that in knowing it and speaking it we are happy. p. 104 21. It is the great paradox of the modern world that at the very time when the world decided that people should not be coerced about their form of religion, it also decided that they should be coerced about their form of education. p. 104 22. To say that the moderns are half-educated may be too complementary by half. p. 107 23. On history, “To compare the present and the past is like comparing a drop of water and the sea. p. 131 24. Theology is a product far more practical than chemistry. p. 182 25. Sin is in a man’s soul, not in his tools or his toys. p. 178 16. On marriage: I have known many happy marriages, but never a compatible one. The whole aim of marriage is to fight through and survive the instant when incompatibility becomes unquestionable. For a man and woman, as such, are incompatible. p. 255-6 Summary and Recommendation: Ahlquist notes that "Chesterton said that we do not need a church that moves with the world; we need a church that will move the world. He added, “A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it.“ As Ahquist writes, "G.K. Chesterton was a living thing who went against the stream." Reading this book will help us to go with him. I highly recommend it. About the Chesterton Bibliography . . . Common Sense 101 also includes "AN ALMOST BRIEF, SLIGHTLY ANNOTATED, MOSTLY CHRONOLOGICAL CHESTERTON BIBLIOGRAPHY." These thirty-two pages are a gift to the reader. For those, like me, who may only be familiar with Chesterton's Orthodoxy, or The Everlasting Man, or perhaps mildly familiar with his Father Brown detective stories, this provides the reader with a more complete range of Chesterton‘s work. It is an exceptional resource. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jan 28, 2021
|
Feb 28, 2021
|
Jan 28, 2021
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0807005711
| 9780807005712
| 0807005711
| 4.62
| 3,478
| Nov 30, 1966
| Jan 01, 1968
|
it was amazing
|
None
|
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 17, 2020
|
Oct 28, 2020
|
Dec 31, 2020
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0525521658
| 9780525521655
| 0525521658
| 4.08
| 1,086
| Sep 18, 2018
| Sep 18, 2018
|
really liked it
|
None
|
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Nov 10, 2020
|
Nov 12, 2020
|
Nov 10, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0465066976
| 9780465066971
| 0465066976
| 4.24
| 697
| Feb 24, 2015
| Feb 24, 2015
|
it was amazing
|
Outstanding!
|
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Oct 30, 2020
|
Nov 20, 2020
|
Oct 30, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0525652884
| 9780525652885
| 0525652884
| 4.45
| 7,386
| Oct 15, 2019
| Oct 15, 2019
|
really liked it
|
Some people admire bridges. Tasha Morrison builds them. Be The Bridge: Pursuing God's Heart for Racial Reconciliation is a compelling case, a helpful
Some people admire bridges. Tasha Morrison builds them. Be The Bridge: Pursuing God's Heart for Racial Reconciliation is a compelling case, a helpful map, and a catalytic spark to better understand the racial divide; more importantly, how to begin to heal it. I appreciate Ms. Morrison's careful work. She strives to be biblical and historical, showcasing biblical patterns as she uncovers historical atrocities. To her credit and our benefit, she does not leave us gazing in outrage at the inequities of the past. A summary hope (p. 222) gets to the "heal of the matter": If this book serves to highlight just one truth, I hope it's that real beauty can come from the ashes of our country's history with racism. So we continue to spread the message. As the apostle Paul declared, "Because we understand our fearful responsibility to the Lord, we work hard to persuade others."We must listen closely as she, like Mark Vroegop in Weep with Me: How Lament Opens a Door for Racial Reconciliation, urges us to listen deeply, confess, lament, repent, and seek to do what we can to repair the ripped, frayed, and tattered threads of the past. Morrison addresses the problem of "filtered history" in America, how our history books often fail to satisfactorily address the racial inequities and atrocities committed against African Americans in particular, but also meted out against Native American and Japanese Americans (WWII). She takes pains to help us look back upon our troubled history. This is helpful. Historians can debate the volume of the historical record, educators the amount of information and time devoted to it. And we can all take responsibility for our own education. At times, Ms. Morrison seems to apply examples of collective repentance (Daniel and Ezra on behalf of Israel) as models for us to follow. In some of these places, I cannot tell if she is chiding and challenging America or the church in America. Her call for reparations fails to consider or account for billions in governmental reparative and restoration legislation and social programs. And while I don't want to discount the need to lament and repent, how much and for how long is enough? While I understand her book is an exploration of and pursuit of "racial reconciliation," I feel like I am on a one-way street. The problem is with the majority culture. And though she highlights the need for forgiveness and personal responsibility for owning one's "blackness," there seems to be a screaming silence when it comes to personal responsibility; i.e. the problem is the past wrongs committed against one, not the failure of any one "victim." I appreciate Shelby Steele here. Steele notes, The point is that those poetic truths, and the notions of correctness that force them on society, prevent America from seeing itself accurately. That is their purpose. They pull down the curtain on what is actually true. If decades of government assistance have weakened the black family with dependency an dysfunction, poetic truth argues all the more fervently that blacks are victims and that whites are privileged. Poetic truths stigmatize the actual truth with the sins of America's past so that truth itself becomes the "incorrect." (Shelby Steele, Shame: How America's Past Sins Have Polarized Our Country, p. 25We need the message of Be The Bridge. I need it! But personally, and as a country, we must guard against and move from narratives of victimhood. Ultimately, they leave us in the unforgivable past despite our best attempts to move from it. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 17, 2020
|
Jun 17, 2020
|
Jun 17, 2020
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1472142969
| 9781472142962
| 1472142969
| 3.84
| 1,718
| Feb 05, 2019
| 2019
|
it was amazing
|
Bricker and Ibbitson are big proponents of immigration and multiculturalism. In fact, they postulate "If America is to remain great, it must remain a
Bricker and Ibbitson are big proponents of immigration and multiculturalism. In fact, they postulate "If America is to remain great, it must remain a nation that welcomes immigrants." (184) This in not a book of high-minded, politically driven platitudes. The authors explain why both immigration and multiculturalism are necessary -- and how the global and American birth rates back up their claim. I found Empty Planet fascinating. The authors push back on the United Nations prediction that we are heading toward a global population malaise of eleven billion people. In doing so, they dispel a number of population myths. Here are three: Myth #1: The world population is heading toward an unbearable 11 billion people. Poverty, conflict, and environmental degradation await us. Actually, the population will probably peek at nine billion and then begin to decline. Myth #2: Fertility rates are astronomically high in developing countries. Actually, while many populations are high, in many if not most developing/developed countries (Thailand, India, Africa, China), birth rates are now below the replacement rate of 2.1 children. Myth #3: African American and Latino Americans are overwhelming white America with their higher fertility rates. Actually, the rates of the three groups have converged. In fact, the birth rates among African Americans and Latino American actually declined in the recent American recession. The authors note two factors that are driving down the birth rate: urbanization (the authors provide the numbers and the rationale) and "the universal tendency of immigrants to align their child-bearing habits with those of their adopted country."183 I have noted so many passages in this book, particularly at chapter 5, "The Economics of Babies" (Americans adopt more babies abroad than the rest of the world combined); chapter 7, "Shutting Down The Factory" (population decline not explosion is our future), and chapter 8, "Push and Pull Migration" (includes population nomenclature and the important distinction between immigrants and migrants). But chapter 10, "The Second American Century," is clearly my most "marked-up chapter." The authors state: Although Australia and Canada bring in more migrants as a share of their population, the United States dwarfs all others in terms of the absolute volume of legal immigrants--typically around one million people per year, more than twice as many as any other country." And that is not counting the illegal stream crossing the border from Mexico. (177)Setting aside the illegal issue for a moment, it is precisely that immigration -- and America's welcoming attitude toward immigrants (unlike Russia, China, and most of Asia) that will "secure the American hegemony" as the dominant world leader (175-6). This was a very interesting discussion with significant implications. My takeaway? Immigration helps sustain a birth rate that sustains a country that sustains an economy, a cultural hegemony, and democratic ideal. Again, the reason is simple: the birthrate of white, non-Latino women has remained steady at 1.8 children per woman of reproducing age, while those of African American women and Latino women has declined steadily, most notably during the recent recession, when the birth rates of latter two groups were "dropping like a stone" (178). America needs immigration. At the outset of this review, I noted, "This in not a book of high-minded, politically driven platitudes." There was one point when I felt the authors left their research-driven rationales and slipped into political swagger: Today, many white Americans, either implicitly--through anonymous posts on the web, for example--or explicitly--through the so-called alt-right movement--complain that the United States is losing its identity as a mostly white, Christian nation, which is why they supported Donald Trump in the 2016 election, and support as well his plan to build a "big, beautiful wall" at the Mexican border to keep out "illegals." Others fear that immigrants of all kinds steal jobs from "real" Americans and depress wages.No doubt some do hold those views, but I felt this was an unnecessary political jab. The author's primary argument has been immigration and urbanization, not a border wall. And why stain the Christian segment who work for immigration with "guilt-by-association" of those whose attitude lacks the Christian charity they should promote? Anyone who reads their book can see the numbers and draw their own conclusions. That little disappointment aside, I highly recommend Empty Planet. As the author's note, "Poverty isn't a good thing or a bad thing. But it is a big thing." (3). This carefully researched and thought-provoking read will have you nodding in agreement. I gave Empty Planet five stars for five reasons: (1) Strong research, (2) Engaging writing, (3) Providing a global perspective, (4) Making a compelling case, (5) Thoughtful implications and applications. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Dec 22, 2019
|
Dec 27, 2019
|
Dec 22, 2019
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
081299325X
| 9780812993257
| 081299325X
| 3.65
| 24,834
| Mar 10, 2015
| Apr 14, 2015
|
really liked it
|
None
|
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 14, 2019
|
Feb 17, 2019
|
Feb 14, 2019
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0143037838
| 9780143037835
| 0143037838
| 4.19
| 25,358
| Sep 05, 2006
| Sep 05, 2006
|
really liked it
|
Yvon Chouinard's Let My People Go Surfing is a wake-up call to be better steward's of the earth's resources -- and how to do it. This is not a tree-hu
Yvon Chouinard's Let My People Go Surfing is a wake-up call to be better steward's of the earth's resources -- and how to do it. This is not a tree-huger manifesto, but the story of how one man and one company have made a profound difference on the ecological front. Chouinard is both evolutionist and activist, a life-long naturalist and the highly effective founder and owner of Patagonia, designers and sellers "of outdoor clothing and gear for the silent sports: climbing, surfing, skiing and snowboarding, fly fishing, and trail running." While I differ with his worldview I admire his overview of the perilous state of our planet. He is convincing! Chouinard and the folks who work with him are knowledgeable and they put their money where their mouth is, investing significant resources (money and people) to address environmental challenges. Their company mission statement is: "We're in business to save our home planet." How many companies do you know who devote a percentage of sales (not profits) as a self-imposed environmental tax. They explain their driving force on their website: At Patagonia, we appreciate that all life on earth is under threat of extinction. We aim to use the resources we have—our business, our investments, our voice and our imaginations—to do something about it.Read this book or examine their Patagonia website. Some of my takeaways: 1. Any worthwhile effort is the result of persistence through difficulties. You may not agree with everything he says (I sure don't), but for a company that started out selling a better piton, which morphed into a world-wide brand, his story is impressive. Patagonia didn't know anything about clothing or food, but are niche industry leaders in both areas. Their knowledge extends far beyond just being "organic." 2. How they promote who they are to other people. Patagonia is about substance, not flash. They are not trying to "wow" a following, but serve a sector that needs what they offer. 3. The why and how behind recycling. We've been recycling for years, but Yvon Chouinard explains the necessity and the how-to in a way that makes me want to initiate changes in both my lifestyle and through our church. 4. How to find an effective CEO (and I'll add) "and leaders in general." They are hand's on people. When there is a problem of any kind these people these people have the confidence to think it through and solve it themselves instead of looking for a repairman or consultant. The longevity of a CEO's career is directly proportional to his or her problem-solving skills and to adapt and grow with the job." Excellent insight! 5. Kaizen. Chouinard never uses the Japanese word for "continuous improvement," but he and his company certainly exemplify it. The Patagonia story challenges me to constantly do what I can (and then some) to be "best in class." Their efforts and determination are exemplary. I couldn't help but be wowed by Chouinard's awareness of and command of the environmental argument for a better/greener planet. That said, I wish he had backed up his reports, "facts", etc with links to the research behind them. That was disappointing. Additionally, evolutionist are not allowed to use the word, "miracle" (which he does). His worldview doesn't allow for miracles :). Great book. Read it. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 10, 2019
|
Feb 14, 2019
|
Feb 14, 2019
|
Paperback
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.09
|
it was amazing
|
Dec 31, 2023
|
Dec 31, 2023
|
||||||
3.97
|
really liked it
|
Oct 28, 2022
|
Oct 27, 2022
|
||||||
3.98
|
really liked it
|
Aug 18, 2022
|
Jul 20, 2022
|
||||||
4.23
|
it was amazing
|
Nov 27, 2021
|
Nov 08, 2021
|
||||||
4.05
|
it was amazing
|
Nov 17, 2021
|
May 10, 2021
|
||||||
4.43
|
it was amazing
|
Nov 18, 2021
|
Apr 24, 2021
|
||||||
0.00
|
not set
|
Mar 27, 2021
|
|||||||
4.02
|
it was amazing
|
Apr 16, 2021
|
Mar 27, 2021
|
||||||
4.50
|
it was amazing
|
Mar 20, 2021
|
Mar 18, 2021
|
||||||
4.38
|
it was amazing
|
Mar 13, 2021
|
Mar 02, 2021
|
||||||
4.57
|
it was amazing
|
Feb 27, 2021
|
Feb 13, 2021
|
||||||
4.14
|
it was amazing
|
Feb 13, 2021
|
Feb 07, 2021
|
||||||
4.26
|
it was amazing
|
Feb 28, 2021
|
Jan 28, 2021
|
||||||
4.62
|
it was amazing
|
Oct 28, 2020
|
Dec 31, 2020
|
||||||
4.08
|
really liked it
|
Nov 12, 2020
|
Nov 10, 2020
|
||||||
4.24
|
it was amazing
|
Nov 20, 2020
|
Oct 30, 2020
|
||||||
4.45
|
really liked it
|
Jun 17, 2020
|
Jun 17, 2020
|
||||||
3.84
|
it was amazing
|
Dec 27, 2019
|
Dec 22, 2019
|
||||||
3.65
|
really liked it
|
Feb 17, 2019
|
Feb 14, 2019
|
||||||
4.19
|
really liked it
|
Feb 14, 2019
|
Feb 14, 2019
|