Elena's Reviews > The Light Years

The Light Years by Elizabeth Jane Howard
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
6560708
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: read-in-2014

I started reading The Light Years right after I sat my M.A’s first exam and I chose the book because I thought I needed something more domestic and tranquil than the usual crime novel. My paperback edition made the book seem quite long and I thought it would take me ages to finish it, but Howards’ description of 1937′s everyday life and issues is as addictive as a mystery to be solved. The Light Years is the perfect mix between Mrs. Dalloway and Downton Abbey.

Although the book’s description centers around the three brothers – and I have to say that put me off at first – the narrative actually focuses through very different characters, including their wives and children. And, by focusing through them, Howard explores “the nameless” problems that Victorian morals and manners still sanctioned. One of my favourite examples is the construction of female sexuality only in a heterosexual frame as something useful to bear children, but that brought no pleasure to women. The same happens with the curse which came unannounced and scared one of the children.

But, the real heart of The Light Years lies, obviously, in the characters. Howards took the perfect setting, a family, and created as many identities as were possible during the 1930′s. The Cazalet brothers represent different outcomes of those who enlisted to fight in WWI and their wives stand for the many and complex lives that wives and mothers – who were not allowed to be more than that – lead in their domestic environment. It is only natural then that every reader picks up a favourite. For those who have read it, I loved Hugh because of his devotion to his wife, although Rupert and his inner conversations about Zoë and his children nearly moved me to tears. But, my favourite above all was Villy. I think she represents a generation of wives and mothers who started to doubt women’s apparently natural destiny as simply mothers and wives, but who, at the same time, instilled the same ideas into their daughters. I found Villy’s inner discussions with herself are as complex and as real as these kind of struggles are.

I had one issue with the book, and it was really about the book and not about the narrative. The front cover- all pink with flowers – had a recommendation by Cosmopolitan. I think The Cazalet Chronicles are a very important work of art and the fact that they deal with domestic and private life does not make them “chick-lit” or whatever name literature who targets women has. I have long had issues with the distinction women’s/men’s literature because I find it pointless: just read what you want. But, sadly, this kind of labelling still exists. So, I urge everyone, men and women, to read The Cazalet Chronicles because they are a long, warm walk into 20th century everyday life and issues.
http://booksandreviews.wordpress.com
33 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Light Years.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

December 27, 2013 – Started Reading
December 27, 2013 – Shelved
January 13, 2014 – Finished Reading
December 7, 2014 – Shelved as: read-in-2014

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Amanda Vaughan Good point re the awful cover and the Cosmo inference!


message 2: by Tom (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tom Great review Elena. Agree 100% with your comments about “chick lit” marketing. I’m a standard 66 year old bloke and I picked this up for 50p in a charity shop in York about 3 weeks ago. I just took a punt because I fancied something different. I did not have high expectations, but needless to say I was gripped and having finished Volume 1 this morning I’ll be moving on quickly to the next book. This is a serious and beautifully crafted book that deserves a much higher reputation. Fashions will change though and this will endure when so much contemporary fiction will not.


message 3: by Jan (new)

Jan Priddy The title is, then, somewhat ironic. I suggest this having been born in 1952.


back to top