Lawyer's Reviews > Just Mercy

Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3025547
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: 2015, 21st-century, civil-rights, group-read, on-the-southern-literary-trail, non-fiction, memoir, law, bryan-stevenson
Read 2 times. Last read June 6, 2015 to June 13, 2015.

Just Mercy: Following the Road Less Taken

Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption was chosen as a Group Read for June, 2015, by On the Southern Literary Trail. My special thanks to Jane, my good friend who nominated this selection.

 photo Stevenson_zpsjykyqcqm.jpg
Bryan Stevenson

Bryan Stevenson has written a compelling memoir with Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption. This is an important work which should be read by any individual who is concerned with the concept of Justice and incidents of Injustice that merit compassion and mercy.

Stevenson, the founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, and its Executive Director, is a committed advocate opposed to the imposition of the death penalty, an advocate for unjustly imprisoned children, and an iconic American citizen at the forefront of discussing racism as reflected in the Judicial System. It is a book that will surprise you, shock you, and appall you. Simply put, read this book, one of the Ten most noted books of 2014 by the New York Times, the Washington Post, and numerous other literary reviews.

My work with the poor and the incarcerated has persuaded me that the opposite of poverty is not wealth; the opposite of poverty is justice. Finally, I’ve come to believe that the true measure of our commitment to justice, the character of our society, our commitment to the rule of law, fairness, and equality cannot be measured by how we treat the rich, the powerful, the privileged, and the respected among us. The true measure of our character is how we treat the poor, the disfavored, the accused, the incarcerated, and the condemned.” -Bryan Stevenson


Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption revolves around the case of an innocent man, Walter McMillian, a black man who had a white girl friend in Monroe County, Alabama, framed by the Sheriff, the District Attorney, and convicted by a Jury for the murder of a clerk in a dry cleaner's shop. Condemned to die. The Sheriff and the District Attorney ignored the evidence that exonerated him. Manufactured the dirty evidence that convicted him and placed him on death row. Incredibly, though no law provided for it, the Sheriff succeeded in McMillian being held on death row prior to trial within the Alabama penitentiary system. McMillian was held on death row for a total of six years.

 photo McMillian-Arms-Up_zpsf0wghyqp.jpg
Walter McMillian, Exonerated

Although the case occurs in the home town and county of Harper Lee, the community which has gained fame from Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, there is no Atticus Finch to implore the Jury, "For the love of God, do your duty."

Bryan Stevenson surfaces as a real life Atticus Finch who ultimately gathers the evidence, uncovers the chicanery and political machinations that imprisoned McMillian. Stevenson who was a young fledgling attorney not long out of law school. He has argued cases before the United States Supreme Court five times.

Walter McMillian is a man to cheer for. Stevenson is a man to be emulated by so many others in the Justice System. But Stevenson does not gleefully celebrate his victories, the exoneration of the innocent. A bubbling anger appears to roil within him at the injustices he has continued to attempt to right in those years following McMillian's exoneration.

That anger, for me, is understandable yet disturbing. I have to wonder if Stevenson bears a burden that prevents him from having faith in any system responsible for the administration of justice. Whether it is difficult for him to approach any adversary opposite the court room without feeling there is the possibility of fairness.

I was a prosecuting attorney for almost twenty-eight years. I spoke for vulnerable populations. Abused children, victims of sexual assault, both women and men who were undeniable victims of domestic violence. I directed our County's Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Program for almost four years. I began the private practice of law and for nearly two years, represented children as a Guardian Ad Litem, and Adults charged with Criminal Offenses. The years finally took their toll. I am thankfully retired. The Equal Justice Initiative Office is only ninety odd miles away. I owe Bryan Stevenson a vist. Maybe a little volunteer work.

 photo Yellow-Mama_zpsoyhgg5xk.jpg
Alabama's Electric Chair, currently stored in the attic of Holman Prison.

Sunday Morning Coming Down: a Reader's Reflection

I'm having a most unusual Sunday morning. I'm listening to the music of Dale Watson, led there while contemplating Capital Punishment. I'm having a cup of coffee. I've been thinking. A lot.

Reading takes you on strange journeys.

"Yellow Mama" was the name given to Alabama's Electric Chair. Although the Alabama Legislature had authorized death by electrocution in 1923, there was no way to carry out that sentence until 1927.

 photo Kilby_zpssrypkuzp.jpg
Kilby Prison, 1922-1969, Montgomery County, Alabama

Alabama needed a way to electrocute Horace DeVaughan for a double murder committed in Birmingham. Inmate Ed Mason, an English cabinet maker by trade who was serving 60 years for theft and grand larceny, built Yellow Mama. The chair was painted with yellow paint from the nearby Highway Department. The same paint used to paint lane indicators on State roads. The inmates named the new chair.

While well built, the chair didn't work too well. On April 8, 1927, Horace DeVaughn was the first human being to experience "riding the lightning." It was a long ride.

"He prayed to Jesus for hours beforehand, and accepted no food, drink or cigarettes on the night of the execution. In his final statement he expressed that he had been forgiven and had no hard feelings toward anyone, and asked for someone to tell his mother goodbye and that his soul was saved. DeVaughan underwent three 2,000 volt discharges between 12:31 and 12:42 AM. At the first 40-second jolt his body surged forward, a thin gray smoke flowed from under the electrode over his head, and the odor of burning flesh was apparent. After the second discharge, flames were seen on his leg, but he was still alive. After the third jolt, he was pronounced dead. Twenty were present as witnesses, included Moore's brother, George, who traveled from Coffeyville, Kansas and claimed a piece of DaVaughn's belt as a souvenir of his visit."
(The Montgomery Advertiser, Montgomery, Alabama, (2002))

Horace Devaughn was a black man. Two weeks later, Virgil Murphy, a veteran of World War I who was convicted in Houston County of murdering his wife, became the first white man electrocuted in the chair. Before the state's use of the electric chair, executions generally were carried out in the counties by hanging. (The Alabama Department of History and Archives)
 photo Tuscaloosa Old Jail_zps2mbzzvwk.jpg
Tuscaloosa County "Old Jail," where the gallows were

So here I am listening to music by a Birmingham, Alabama, native singing about sitting in that chair. Most of my professional career it was my duty to uphold the imposition of the death penalty. No easy burden. It's a lot to think about when you ask a man's jury of his peers to kill him. I have the utmost respect for Stevenson, though we would have been on opposite sides of the court room had we ever met in one.

I have tried my share of Capital cases. The verdicts in each case was guilty. However, the Jury's sentencing recommendation in all but one Life in Prison Without Parole. Those Defendants will never walk out of prison alive. Unless the Legislature changes the law regarding Life Without Parole. It's quite possible. The State is going broke. The prisons are overcrowded. There is a growing geriatric population in our prisons.

The law prevents an Alabama Prosecutor from telling a Jury that the Legislature could one day allow the possibility of parole in a Capital case. Were a Prosecuting Attorney do that, it would be reversible error.

In each Capital case I have tried, the Judge presiding followed the Jury's sentencing recommendation. In each case, I did not ask the Judge to override the Jury's recommendation. In my opinion the Jury had spoken. The verdict was Just. When the Jury recommended Mercy, I believed Justice had been done.

There is that one case, though. The case where I sought the death penalty, the verdict was guilty. I strenuously argued to the Jury that the only appropriate sentence was death. The Jury's recommendation was death. The Judge presiding imposed the death sentence. That was fourteen years ago. The case remains somewhere in the seemingly endless series of Appeals.

The Defendant murdered his two month old son. Beat and shook him to death. The child had two rib fractures on his chest. The child had eight rib fractures on his back. Picture holding a baby in front of you. Your thumbs gently resting on his chest, your fingers cradling each side of his back. The weight of the baby supported underneath his arms by the flesh between your thumbs and forefingers.

Think of the amount of force necessary to break the cartilaginous ribs of a two month old child. Consider it the same degree of force as the impact of two vehicles colliding each travelling at sixty miles an hour. Consider that the baby's brain was shaken so hard that his brain swelled within his soft skull to the degree the pressure became so great his brain shut down all autonomous nerve processes.

The verdict was just. I have no, absolutely no reason, to be ashamed of the verdict I sought, the sentence I sought. Yet I live with the fact I asked twelve men and women to kill another human being. It will bring you down. But it the life denied a child who will never have the opportunity to grow up that haunts me. I do believe there are cases where the denial of mercy is just.

But. There is always the possibility of a "But." I agree with almost every word Bryan Stevenson wrote.

Surprised?

Two Diverging Roads

I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
Robert Frost, "The Road Not Taken


Bryan Stevenson and I started out on the same road. Neither of us intended to become lawyers.

Each of us felt the compulsion to do something meaningful. As Mr. Stevenson decided he could not help others by continuing his studies in philosophy by philosophizing, I decided not to be a teacher of history, a professor of Classical languages, or even a psychologist, though I took my undergraduate degree in that field.

Actually, I attempted to bluff the Chair of the Department of Psychology into allowing me to undertake my graduate studies in his department a semester earlier. I told him, "Well, if no assistance-ships are available, I'll apply to Law School." It seemed a good idea at the time. I had been tutoring the daughter of a Law Professor in her Latin studies. When the Chair smiled and answered, "We must all do what we must do, Mr. Sullivan," I nodded, swallowed, left his office and applied for entrance to Law School.

I was offered a Graduate Assistant-ship by the Department of Psychology the same day I received my acceptance to the School of Law. In my youthfulness and arrogant pride I turned down the offer and entered the study of Law.

Bryan Stevenson and I also agree about the traditional Law School curriculum. It is esoteric, It is a tortuous experience being the victim of the "Socratic" method of teaching. Students of the law are drilled in the art of confrontation and argument. To me, the desire to "Win" and not "Lose" is instilled in the student of Law. And, therein, lies the danger of Hubris in an adversarial process where the possibility of pride overtakes principle.

Perhaps, I have greater faith in our Judicial system that Stevenson. Or, perhaps I have too much.

There is the point at which we took the road the other did not.

The Tragedy of Walter McMillan

The behavior of two Monroe County District Attorneys primarily contributed to Walter McMillian's conviction and unlawful imprisonment. There should be consequences. Sanctions. The paramount duty of a District Attorney is not to secure a conviction, but to do the right thing. As prosecutors, we are lawyers just as those who are engaged in the private practice of law. I sport a tee shirt that defines a Prosecutor as a lawyer held to a higher standard. I personally always believed that, practiced that.

On June 11, 2015, retired District Attorney Charles J. Sebesta, Jr. was disbarred by State Bar Association of Texas for professional misconduct in obtaining a conviction of Robert Graves for a Capital Murder of six people on the basis of testimony he knew to be perjured. Further, Sebesta flagrantly withheld evidence proving Graves innocence. As a result Graves, an innocent man, was imprisoned for eighteen years for a crime he didn't commit.

It has been fundamental constitutional law since 1963 that prosecutors have an absolute duty to disclose evidence exculpatory to the Defendant. In other words, evidence which might be favorable to the Defendant. See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215) https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremeco....

In its opinion disbarring Sebesta, the Texas Bar Association found he had violated his ethical duty by: eliciting false testimony from Robert Carter, a Co-Defendant;

failing to disclose the exculpatory evidence of Carter’s statement the night before trial, clearing Graves’ of involvement in the crime;

eliciting false testimony from a Texas State Ranger regarding Carter’s statements about Graves’ involvement;

threatening an alibi defense witness with prosecution for the same murders, when he had no evidence to support her involvement, apparently causing her to decide not to testify on Graves’ behalf;

failing to disclose that a prosecution witness was under felony indictment by Sebesta’s office at the time of his testimony.

See http://www.prosecutorialaccountabilit... (2015).

That's simply as it should be. Stevenson's blistering memoir makes me cringe.

Bryant Stevenson attributes many of the problems he confronted to the lingering affects of slavery. Statistics do not lie. That racism exists is undeniable. Stating racism is the primary cause for the manner of imposition of Capital Punishment doesn't work for me. I initially intended to be a Defense Attorney. I cut my chops on the cases of Sacco and Vanzetti, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. My legal literary mentors were Clarence Darrow, Louis Nizer, Melvin Belli and allen dershowitz.

My take on McMillian's case hinges on the base instinct to win at all costs. The very instinct to which law students are subjected throughout their education, whether that is the intent of Law Schools or not. It is a weakness of human nature to submit to the will to win whatever the cost.

Just Mercy isn't perfect. Following is an excerpt from the Sunday Review of Just Mercy, Ted Conover, The New York Times, October 17, 2014.

“Just Mercy” has its quirks, though. Many stories it recounts are more than 30 years old but are retold as though they happened yesterday. Dialogue is reconstituted; scenes are conjured from memory; characters’ thoughts are channeled à la true crime writers: McMillian, being driven back to death row, 'was feeling something that could only be described as rage ... "Loose these chains. Loose these chains." He couldn’t remember when he’d last lost control, but he felt himself falling apart.' Stevenson leaves out identifying years, perhaps to avoid the impression that some of this happened long ago. He also has the defense lawyer’s reflex of refusing to acknowledge his clients’ darker motives. A teenager convicted of a double murder by arson is relieved of agency; a man who placed a bomb on his estranged girlfriend’s porch, inadvertently killing her niece, “had a big heart.”


William Faulkner sums it up for me.

“Some things you must always be unable to bear. Some things you must never stop refusing to bear. Injustice and outrage and dishonor and shame. No matter how young you are or how old you have got. Not for kudos and not for cash: your picture in the paper nor money in the back either. Just refuse to bear them.”-Gavin Stevens, Intruder in the Dust, 1948.

Extras!

"Yellow Mama," Dale Watson, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y44B2...

"The Death of the Death Penalty," DAVID VON DREHLE, Time Magazine, May 28, 20i5" http://time.com/deathpenalty/

"The Death Penalty Information Center," http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/

"The Equal Justice Initiative," http://www.eji.org/














151 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Just Mercy.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
June 6, 2015 – Started Reading
June 6, 2015 – Shelved
June 6, 2015 –
page 1
0.3% "This is a group read for June, 2015, for On the Southern Literary Trail. Come join us!"
June 13, 2015 – Shelved as: 2015
June 13, 2015 – Shelved as: 21st-century
June 13, 2015 – Shelved as: civil-rights
June 13, 2015 – Shelved as: group-read
June 13, 2015 – Shelved as: on-the-southern-literary-trail
June 13, 2015 – Shelved as: non-fiction
June 13, 2015 – Shelved as: memoir
June 13, 2015 – Shelved as: law
June 13, 2015 – Shelved as: bryan-stevenson
June 13, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-42 of 42 (42 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Carol I can't wait to hear your thoughts on this Mike. This book is the best I've read this year.


Lawyer Carol wrote: "I can't wait to hear your thoughts on this Mike. This book is the best I've read this year."

Carol, it's a powerful book. Stevenson and I agree on much. Yet, Stevensonson's memoir takes place over an extended period of time during which the law continued to change. While I recognize the injustices Stevenson documented so eloquently, I felt he was incapable of acknowledging there were any prosecutors who were not allied against him. At times I was reminded of Faulkner's quote, "The past is never dead, it's not even past." Stevenson frequently cites slavery, racism, and poverty as reasons for mitigation of a Defendant's sentence. I cannot agree. Nor can I accept his idea that we are better than the worst thing we have ever done. I was a Staff Attorney at the Court of Criminal Appeals when the Richardson bombing case was on its first appeal. I remember that case clearly today though I reviewed the transcript and exhibits going on 40 years ago. Stevenson is able to find reasons to excuse a client's conduct which I cannot. At the same time I believe we are approaching the end of capital punishment in this country and that it is past time. But I put the responsibility for capital punishment and the way it is imposed at the feet of the US Supreme Court, while Stevenson casts blame on the individual prosecutors and judges at the local level alone. A problem? Of course, but it extends to Court appointees at the highest political levels, appointed for life by the President who is definitely chosen in a partisan election. Stevenson have our strongest meeting of the minds regarding the treatment of juvenile offenders sentenced to die in prison on life without parole cases even on non-homicide cases.

I will have considerably more to say in my review. While my nits may indicate a lesser rating is merited, my five star rating stands. Sometimes people agree more than is apparent, it is merely a manner of reaching accord from different perspectives.


Natalie Richards Wonderful review Mike This has been on my tbr list for a while and hope to get to it very soon. :-).


Lawyer Natalie wrote: "Wonderful review Mike This has been on my tbr list for a while and hope to get to it very soon. :-)."

Natalie, thank you so much for reading. And your kind words. I do hope you enjoy it. The subject matter is tough. But Stevenson handles it well. I recommend it highly.


message 5: by Sue (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sue Wow! Exceptional review Mike. I may just refer others over here. I do want to add that I think this is also a valuable book because of its wealth of information on youth/poor/disabled and other populations in the area of punishment and changing mores. There is much here to ponder. Thanks for your personal insights.


Lawyer Sue wrote: "Wow! Exceptional review Mike. I may just refer others over here. I do want to add that I think this is also a valuable book because of its wealth of information on youth/poor/disabled and other pop..."

Sue, thank you! You're absolutely right about the other important issues Stevenson discusses in this significant read. I know I only addressed the central issue of capital punishment and the manner in which the specific case of Walter McMillian. Of course, being a lawyer, I can laugh at myself with the old joke, "only a lawyer could write a book and call it a brief." I plead Nolo contendere.


message 7: by Tom (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tom Mathews Thank you for this wonderful review. Your insights were fascinating.


Lawyer Tom wrote: "Thank you for this wonderful review. Your insights were fascinating."

Tom, thank you so much! Your comments on the discussion thread for "On the Southern Literary Trail" have been invaluable. So glad to have you there!


message 9: by Michael (new)

Michael The sharing of your personal experiences with the system of law is so moving and makes for quite a lens to reflect on stories such as these. Makes me wonder if you harbor any thoughts sometimes of making your own book.


message 10: by Hana (new) - rated it 5 stars

Hana Thank you for this very thought-provoking review, Mike, and for your comments on my review. What's your take mandatory sentencing, 'three strikes' rules and the like? Are there better ways than others to choose prosecutors and judges? I know, I know! You could probably write a 'brief' encyclopedia on the subject ;)


Lawyer Michael wrote: "The sharing of your personal experiences with the system of law is so moving and makes for quite a lens to reflect on stories such as these. Makes me wonder if you harbor any thoughts sometimes of..."

Hmmm, Michael...yes. I've thought considerably of writing my own book. *grin* I've been encouraged to do so. However, I've limited my writing to the requirements of work, correspondence with friends, and especially in sharing the love of books here in this community. Although my keyboard skills are quite polished, I would prefer to use a fountain pen, a vintage one. The long and the short of it is, perhaps I might. Your kind words are fine encouragement. My sincere thanks for reading this review and letting me know your thoughts.


Lawyer Hana wrote: "Thank you for this very thought-provoking review, Mike, and for your comments on my review. What's your take mandatory sentencing, 'three strikes' rules and the like? Are there better ways than oth..."

Good grief, Ms. Hana...me be brief? I'm only on my first cup of coffee. On a Monday morning, too. *smile*

There, now. Coffee topped off. Put my glasses on. Helps me think...

Determinate sentencing? I'm for it. The three strikes and you're out laws? I'm against them. They haven't worked. And, as the prisons have filled up, I've seen legislators snip, snip here and snip, snip there to water the statutes down. What initially made for such dramatic political advertisements, the clanging of a jail cell door banging as a candidate for Attorney General said, brushing his hands against one another, smoothly saying, "And that's that..." Well, great for appearing to be tough on crime. Not great when your prisons are filled, small rural circuits do not prioritize their cases to determine who is most deserving of a coveted bed in a penitentiary...As my grandfather would say, "It's a mell of a hess." Damned if it's not. So there must be a more thoughtful solution. I believe that is occurring. Approximately a year, two years, before I retired from the District Attorney's Office, Sentencing Standards modeled on those used in the Federal Courts were implemented. Those guidelines should make sentencing more uniform. I liked the sentencing guidelines. It would take considerable more space to my liking-that "brief" encyclopedic rendering to give a more specific answer.

Better ways to select prosecutors and judges...Ideally, there are. Practically, the current political attitude won't allow it. Many states allow for non-partisan selection of Judges. In the Federal Courts, U.S. Attorneys and Judges are appointed by the administration in power. Ahem...to me that's still a partisan selection.

My State, beginning in the late 1970s, turned from a solidly blue state to a waving your cape in front of a bull RED state. My rather cynical opinion is everyone who seeks political office is going to call themselves a "Republican" whether they are in fact, or not. So everyone should run as a Republican and let God and the Electorate sort them out.

There, now. I feel all better. I believe it's the sugar free hazlenut in my coffee. Hmmm...overall length...not too long, not too short. Full of the sound and fury most likely signifying nothing. I love the smell of Shakespeare in the morning, smells like Victory! Naaaw. It's been done. Somewhere. Actually the Bard in the morning was probably quite rank. Different standards of bathing and whatnot.

I will give your serious question more serious thought as my caffeine level is spiked. *ahem*


message 13: by Hana (last edited Jun 29, 2015 07:39AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Hana Wow! *Hana gulps her second double-strength Irish Breakfast tea, shoves glasses up nose*

Determinate sentencing is the same thing as mandatory sentencing? I take it 'sentencing guidelines' are a little more flexible? *scratches head...finds that doesn't help...gulps more tea*

The reason I ask is that I've been read some of John McWhorter's thoughts on the 'war on drugs' and crime/police relations in minority communities. One of the things he mentions are problems with inflexible sentences for non-violent drug crime, but his arguments are much more subtle and interesting than just the sentencing issue. I'll try and track it down.

BTW have you read McWhorter's Losing the Race: Self-Sabotage in Black America? I read it a long time ago but I recall it as a thoughtful, if provocative, analysis.


Lawyer Hana wrote: "Wow! *Hana gulps her second double-strength Irish Breakfast tea, shoves glasses up nose*

Determinate sentencing is the same thing as mandatory sentencing? I take it 'sentencing guidelines' are a l..."


*Sips Third Cup of Coffee*

Yes. The sentencing guidelines are indeed more flexible. *grin*

*Sullivan allows his glasses to slip down the bridge of his nose*

Will post the link to the standards. You'll find it interesting. And I will have to check out McWorter's thoughts.

*Sullivan thinks Hana is making this a tough Monday Grinning*


message 15: by Hana (new) - rated it 5 stars

Hana *Hana grins wickedly. Thinks about a third cup of tea* Seriously, Mike, I would be very interested in reading the standards!


message 16: by Jane (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jane I owe Bryan Stevenson a vist. Maybe a little volunteer work..... now that would be a fabulous journey Mike would nt it ? Many years a ago I asked a SC Judge if he believed the Death penalty in America would ever be abolished , he said ,"It s coming but slowly", I am still waiting -as is everybody else -what do you think Mike ?


message 17: by Hana (last edited Jun 29, 2015 09:26AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Hana The Supreme Court just ruled this morning to permit execution by a contested method of lethal injection. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/20...

Breyer and Ginsberg, in their dissenting opinion, argued for a broader review of the death penalty, but Scalia and Breyer countered that: "Time and again, the People have voted to exact the death penalty as punishment for the most serious of crimes. Time and again, this Court has upheld that decision. And time and again, a vocal minority of this Court has insisted that things have “changed radically,” post, at 2, and has sought to replace the judgments of the People with their own standards of decency. Capital punishment presents moral questions that philosophers, theologians, and statesmen have grappled with for millennia. The Framers of our Constitution disagreed bitterly on the matter. For that reason, they handled it the same way they handled many other controversial issues: they left it to the People to decide. By arrogating to himself the power to overturn that decision, Justice Breyer does not just reject the death penalty, he rejects the Enlightenment."

Sounds like SCOTUS will follow rather than lead on this issue, as was the case in the gay marriage question. So it's up to the People, people!


Lawyer Hana wrote: "*Hana grins wickedly. Thinks about a third cup of tea* Seriously, Mike, I would be very interested in reading the standards!"

You may want to put on another kettle of that tea. *chuckle* Here's the link to Alabama's most current sentencing standards. And, yeah, I did have some input in them through one of my favorite Judges, Joe Colquitt, who swore me in as an Assistant District Attorney way back in 1979. I even had hair then. And it wasn't salt and pepper then, either. Well...time passes for us all. May have to put on Springsteen's "Glory Days." GRIN.

Alabama Sentencing Commission: http://sentencingcommission.alacourt....

You'll need your glasses for this. *GRIN*

*Stevens smiles wickedly as he drops this off on Hana's Porch, quietly tiptoeing off with a mischievous laugh.*


Lawyer Jane wrote: "I owe Bryan Stevenson a vist. Maybe a little volunteer work..... now that would be a fabulous journey Mike would nt it ? Many years a ago I asked a SC Judge if he believed the Death penalty in Amer..."

I think it IS coming. Whether it is decided on a moral basis or the practical approach that continuing Capital Litigation costs far more than imprisoning dangerous Capital Defendants for the rest of their lives, will accomplish the same thing. I do highly recommend that cited article by DRELHE in the link to the May 28th issue of Time magazine.

Then I see news of the latest SCOTUS opinion linked by Hana and I wonder if the end is near. For me, the waivering slow death of capital punishment has truly been one by inches. And, for me, it solidifies my thoughts regarding the long term effects of life time appointments to SCOTUS. It is a perplexing issue that I believe should be decided in the best interests of this country's society, judicial system, and assures that no innocent person has been executed. As one Justice has said, "Death is different." Nothing could have been more simply said that leads to the possibility of the most complex issues of morality, philosophy, and the priorities of a society.

So good to have you drop by for a visit. Hope all things are well for you in the UK. My continued thanks for all your contributions to The Trail. You nominated a true winner with this nomination.

Without doubt, this is the most significant book I have read this year. I consider it your recommendation, to the Trail and to me.


Lawyer Hana wrote: "The Supreme Court just ruled this morning to permit execution by a contested method of lethal injection. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/20......"

Thanks, Hana. I'll be looking for the text of this opinion today. Clearly significant rulings coming out of SCOTUS. Enough to keep scholars, journalists, citizens, and pundits debating these issues.


message 21: by Hana (new) - rated it 5 stars

Hana Yikes, Mike! I just downloaded the drug sentencing worksheets--reminds me of doing my taxes. Thanks for a very interesting link.


message 22: by Jane (last edited Jun 29, 2015 10:08AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jane Mike wrote: "Jane wrote: "I owe Bryan Stevenson a vist. Maybe a little volunteer work..... now that would be a fabulous journey Mike would nt it ? Many years a ago I asked a SC Judge if he believed the Death pe..."
Please go and tell us all about it !

I used to feel that it was n t up to me to have an opinion at all about the DP in the USA because I was from the UK but living in France for decades and so it was none of my business but life changed that for me by one of those wonderful Frost twists in that old road.

I was doing research on slavery in Georgia and needed to interview a family over there I was looking for information about specific people in Ga in 1865 and I managed to track down the family/descendants when I arrived to interview them they informed me the ancestor had a namesake who was actually on death row Florida....

I ll cut a long story short but during my first visit to Dr Florida, as I waited in the cell , I saw Melendez-Colon waving and saying goodbye to the others -and me in my cell :( everybody was so quiet ,it was such a surreal moment and I asked the guards what s going on ? They just said," he s going home".


message 23: by Bionic Jean (new) - added it

Bionic Jean What a fantastic, thought-provoking review, Mike. You've really put your heart and soul into this one, and boy does it show. Thank you so much for sharing it.


message 24: by Jane (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jane It is indeed a wonderful review Mike and I was so looking forward to your views on this .


Carol Mike wrote: "Sometimes people agree more than is apparent, it is merely a manner of reaching accord from different perspectives. "

Very well stated Mike, not just this quote, but the whole. You bring up nits, as you call them, that I would never have thought of. Your background makes you aware of things the general public would not be.

You also said "The Equal Justice Initiative Office is only ninety odd miles away. I owe Bryan Stevenson a vist. Maybe a little volunteer work."

I hope you do...I truly believe you are a man who did, who can, and would make a difference.


message 26: by Tom (last edited Jun 29, 2015 04:19PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tom Mathews Carol wrote: "You also said "The Equal Justice Initiative Office is only ninety odd miles away. I owe Bryan Stevenson a vist. Maybe a little volunteer work."

I hope you do...I truly believe you are a man who did, who can, and would make a difference. "


I hope so too. When I was listening to Bryan's book I thought that I would love to help out but then I realized that It would involve changing careers at age 59, leaving a family that wouldn't be caught dead in a southern climate, going back to school and then moving all the way across the country for a job that certainly paid less than what I make now. At some point during this process I decided 'Payroll deductions will have to suffice.'


Lawyer Carol wrote: "Mike wrote: "Sometimes people agree more than is apparent, it is merely a manner of reaching accord from different perspectives. "

Very well stated Mike, not just this quote, but the whole. You br..."


Carol, thank you so much for reading the review and your wonderful comments. It IS something I would be interested in doing!


Lawyer Tom wrote: "Carol wrote: "You also said "The Equal Justice Initiative Office is only ninety odd miles away. I owe Bryan Stevenson a vist. Maybe a little volunteer work."

I hope you do...I truly believe you ar..."


Ah, c'mon, Tom! Montgomery's an interesting place! I know all the bookstores, best places to eat. Scratch best places to eat. Yeah, have to cut expenses. Hmmm...Got it! Chris's Hot Dogs! 138 Dexter Avenue. Yep. Affordable. A downtown Montgomery tradition. Since 1917. Family owned. Menu's right here. http://www.chrishotdogs.com/ . And it's just a hop to Dexter Avenue Baptist Church. Y'know, I was the designated cruise director for any business travel. *GRIN*


Lawyer Jane wrote: "Mike wrote: "Jane wrote: "I owe Bryan Stevenson a vist. Maybe a little volunteer work..... now that would be a fabulous journey Mike would nt it ? Many years a ago I asked a SC Judge if he believed..."

Jane, what an eerie experience. I'm sure it was something that was shocking at the time and obviously an experience that remains as current in your memory as when it occurred.


Lawyer Jean wrote: "What a fantastic, thought-provoking review, Mike. You've really put your heart and soul into this one, and boy does it show. Thank you so much for sharing it."

Jean thank you so much for reading. Your comments are very special. I was so pleased to see you had added this great book to your tbr shelf because of my recommendation. I appreciate your thoughtfulness.


Lawyer Jane wrote: "It is indeed a wonderful review Mike and I was so looking forward to your views on this ."

Thank you, Ma'am! But you're the one who got me to read it. *grin* I'll be looking forward to your thoughts on this one. Keep those nominations coming. You've brought some great reads to The Trail.


Lawyer Hana wrote: "Yikes, Mike! I just downloaded the drug sentencing worksheets--reminds me of doing my taxes. Thanks for a very interesting link."

I expected that "Yikes!" That was my reaction when all of the guidelines were developed. What is especially interesting about the guidelines are the criteria for the different types of offenses, the grading to determine the RANGE of punishment. And what every lawyer and client wants to know: Whether or not probation will be granted or whether it is a sentence to be served within the penal system. It is a very "flexible" determinate sentencing scheme, I think. However, the setting of ranges gives a degree of flexibility that prevents the guidelines from establishing a strict determinate sentencing that amounts to mandatory sentencing. Especially interesting is the effect of the guidelines on lessening the impact of the Habitual Offender's Act-the three strikes laws as they are commonly known.

Happy to provide your entertainment for a Monday. *chuckle*


message 33: by Tom (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tom Mathews Mike wrote: "Ah, c'mon, Tom! Montgomery's an interesting place! I know all the bookstores, best places to eat. Scratch best places to eat. Yeah, have to cut expenses. Hmmm...Got it! Chris's Hot Dogs! 138 Dexter Avenue. Yep. Affordable. A downtown Montgomery tradition. Since 1917. Family owned. Menu's right here. http://www.chrishotdogs.com/ . And it's just a hop to Dexter Avenue Baptist Church. Y'know, I was the designated cruise director for any business travel. *GRIN* "

I would consider a visit to Montgomery delightful, especially with such a well qualified cruise director.

Actually, I've been to Montgomery. I've just never seen it. I trace my passion for civil rights back to those heady days when I risked the disfavor of our neighbors by giving our maid a ride home during the bus strike. Of course I really had no say in the matter, being en utero and all. My dad worked for the Agency but took a sabbatical in 1955-56 to attend the Naval War College. They must not have found too many exciting things to do while there so they made me. *Grin back atcha*


message 34: by Jane (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jane Tom wrote: "Mike wrote: "Ah, c'mon, Tom! Montgomery's an interesting place! I know all the bookstores, best places to eat. Scratch best places to eat. Yeah, have to cut expenses. Hmmm...Got it! Chris's Hot Dog..."

It all sounds wonderful and I will be green ,I loved Montgomery .

There s a nice hotel around the corner from Stevenson s and a bookshop opposite ! grin


Julie Stunning review, Mike. This book is a soul-changer.


Lawyer Julie wrote: "Stunning review, Mike. This book is a soul-changer."

Thanks so much for reading and your kind comment. Yes. This is a book to be read by anyone with an interest in the achievement of Justice. Stevenson is an inspiration.


message 37: by Booky (new) - added it

Booky Brilliant!


Susan One of the most thoughtful, inspired reviews I've read on GR. Food for thought as I'm finishing the last 25% of Stevenson's book. Having seen him speak, he is just as inspiring in person as on the page.


Holly Another gripping and painful page turner in this vein (sadly) is Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall and the Groveland Boys. I will never be the same after reading this book.


Angie Fantastic review!


Robin Wonderful review, thank you for sharing you thoughts with us here, along with those pictures! The book’s content was tough reading but so moving.


message 42: by D.J. (new) - rated it 4 stars

D.J. Howard Thank you for sharing of your personal stories working with the legal system. They are enlightening and moving. I will be sure to visit the links you provided to gain more knowledge. Please, keep writing and sharing.


back to top