carol. 's Reviews > Libriomancer

Libriomancer by Jim C. Hines
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3978225
's review

liked it
bookshelves: urban-fantasy, vampires, fast-and-fun
Read 2 times. Last read October 13, 2012 to October 16, 2012.

I'm enchanted by the idea behind Libriomancer--really, what book lover wouldn't be? Mass reading/belief in a book enables specially trained book-loving readers, known as 'libromancers,' to bring parts of the book into life. Widely-read readers will be further amused by multitudes of book references, creating a little nudge-wink action.

Short summary: Isaac is in the library cataloging books when he is attacked by angry Sanguinarius Meyerii (aka 'sparklers'). They're looking for information behind attacks on the vampires and are ready to drain him to get it. Deft libromancy, a butt-kicking dryad named Lena and a fire-spider named Smudge take care of the attack. The three go to Isaac's to compare notes and consult with Isaac's contacts in the Porters, the secret organization of libromancers started by Gutenberg in the late 1400s. Still alive five hundred years later (he pulled the Holy Grail from the Bibles he printed), he hasn't been seen since the trouble with the vampires started. Although he should be protected by twelve automatons he created, it appears the automatons are being used in attacks against the Porters.

It's a great premise that springs into action in the beginning, and the first four chapters had me riveted. A number of sections made me smile, especially Issac's Babel fish, and the Latin classifications for vampires--their informant is a hybrid Sanguinarius Stokerus. When we hit the road in chapter five, however, a minor case of 'first book' syndrome developed, which is to say a lot of info-dumping, cumbersomely inserted into the story by Isaac explaining Porters to Lena, and her explaining dryads in return.

On a positive note, there is interesting character building here, especially the secondary ones. Brief appearances by a few different Porters are interesting and give a picture of complex beings doing a challenging job. My hands-down favorite is the fire-spider, Smudge, (and there's something I've never said before), with his taste for sweets (particularly chocolate-covered ants) and fondness for SpongeBob's red tie. I was most ambivalent about the dryad, who suffered from attempt-to-appeal-to-modern-women-while-being-written-by-modern-man-syndrome (it's becoming a more and more common condition). You know what I mean--kicks butt, rides a motorcycle, physically chunky, eats junk food, has a can-do spirit and wears high-top sneakers. However, as the antithesis of feminism, she is required by nature to have a lover, whose needs and interests then help define her. Male or female, doesn't matter--it's in her nature to be attached. Maybe I didn't mean 'appeal to modern women.' Maybe I meant 'appeal to geek guys.'

The hero has a number of faults, making a number of questionable decisions, tending to martyristic actions and generally ruthlessly using the non-humans (such as planting a bomb on a vampire). Lena humanizes him, and forces him to question some of those assumptions. So while I applaud the effort to inject ethical considerations, it's still annoying. Yep, that's earth-woman's role, professing love and understanding for all creatures and helping man understand his connection.

So what went wrong? Excessive explanations continued to the climax, probably necessary because the plot and villains both seemed quite convoluted. While I liked Lena's kick-butt actions, it was a bit too stereotypical, added to being generally cognitively weird for a tree dryad. What tore it for me was the Piers Anthony grade relationship between Isaac and Lena, ("Is it right to love someone that is forced by nature to love me?" --gaack). To me, Hines took a marvelous concept, started to execute it well, and mucked it up by dabbling in romance. (view spoiler).

However, there were a number of delightful sections:

"What was that stuff?"
"Truth serum." Deb didn't move. I wouldn't have either, given how pissed off Lena looked. "I read about it in your reports. Bujold, I think."
That would explain my laid-back reaction. Bujold wrote good truth drugs.

"Which reminds me, there's a vampire hand in your freezer's ice maker." Seeing my aghast expression, she added, "Don't worry. I double-bagged it."

"All total, I was packing sixteen titles when I finished, including a hardcover in the front that should provide a little extra protection for the heart."

All in all, I'd call it three stars. I'll likely check out a sequel if it appears, but I'll be getting it from the public library.

Cross posted at http://clsiewert.wordpress.com/2013/0...
88 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Libriomancer.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
August 4, 2012 – Shelved
October 13, 2012 – Started Reading
October 16, 2012 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-25 of 25 (25 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Katy (new) - added it

Katy Good review - thanks!


carol. Thanks, Katy!


Squee The Lena subplot was a big turnoff for me--I felt like the author was trying to make a potentially decent point but didn't pull it off. The ethical weight of Lena's situation did not mesh well with the geeky magic adventure story of the rest of the story and seems to be more a vehicle for Isaac's angst than a true and serious problem. "Appeal to geek guys" pretty much sums it up, especially at the end--the guy doesn't just get the girl, he gets her girlfriend too! (Who happens to be his psychiatrist. Yeah, no conflict there...)

Your review is pretty much exactly how I felt about this book.


carol. Thanks, Squee! I think you described the problem perfectly. I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one.


Jennifer Bingo! "Appeal to geek guys" is the perfect description. I don't object to the romance subplot, but I really didn't like the execution.


carol. Thanks, Jennifer. Ditto. If he would have skipped it, probably would have been a 4 to 5 star read.


Moira Yeah, this nails my reaction completely.

I loved Smudge (and I HATE spiders - in fact I'm arachnophobic, will be skipping the movie adaptation if there is one ((a lot of the time it read like a script novelization)) ), and liked the general idea, but the book foundered in two major ways. It was so hot on in media res a couple of times I wondered if I had bought the second or even third book in the series by mistake, and yet there was so much heavy exposition and infodumping (expodumping?) the book just struggled along mightily. Oh yeah, here's the backstory on the guy who was my mentor so you can feel bad about (spoiler). Oh yeah, here's the backstory on the vampire so he can be used as a plot point (I did like the description of Ted's lair). Oh yeah, here's the antagonist's mother so we can get his backstory from her....etc. etc.

And, yeah, Lena the kickass dryad (what) who kept being called "heavyset" every twenty pages (sigh) and the Piers Anthony/Gor setup (WHAT). Which I really didn't think was at all resolved by the "I choose SPOILER!" at the end. I kept thinking uneasily of that old Ray Bradbury story about the Martian shapeshifter who gets caught in a crowd and sort of fizzes to death, pulled every which way by everyone's expectations. It's a shame, because the author is a standup guy and has done a lot of work with sexual abuse/assault survivors and that's one reason why I wanted to buy his book and support him. But I don't think I liked any of the female characters, period.

The one part I really, really loved was when he finds out what the automata (sp) are -- for about two chapters the book suddenly zipped along, all the exposition and gee-whizzery and technodumping and thematic whatsits* beautifully combined. I also liked how (view spoiler) - that seemed like a genuine kickass use of her powers, and nicely thematic again. (But -- as a dryad, how does she feel about books being made out of....paper? And speaking of plot holes, what about ebooks? Photocopies? -- oh well....)

'a cross between Harry Dresden and Thursday Next' is what everyone says and....sadly for me it was accurate, because I don't like either of those series. sigh.


*this is a technical literary term, first invented by Harold Bloom


message 8: by carol. (last edited Jan 16, 2013 08:16PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

carol. Moira!! Welcome back!! So happy you dropped by!

First, I completely agree about Smudge--I don't kill spiders, but I run my (heavyset) butt away if they are larger than a quarter. So my liking him is a definite kudos in the character department.

Yes, I didn't know Jim Hines from any random person, but after finishing this book I found out about his contest with Scalzi to raise money for a charity. Such a fun idea with self-depreciating humor. Why did he have to go all creepy (view spoiler) with this book? And all stereotypical with the females?

Okay, I never thought about the dryad angle and trees=paper. Creepy.


Moira Moira!! Welcome back!! So happy you dropped by!

Aww, thank you! I really missed this place.

So my liking him is a definite kudos in the character department.

YES. I gotta admit I didn't picture him while reading as a full-fledged spider, to save my sanity, but he really did come across as a little person, hatred of Journey, candy habit, trivet-on-the-dashboard and all. Ted the vampire was similar to me -- not in affection, but how he really popped off the page.

I didn't know Jim Hines from any random person, but after finishing this book I found out about his contest with Scalzi to raise money for a charity.

I follow his blog some, and he's written a lot of wonderful, thoughtful posts about feminism, and rape, and stupid male culture, and he did volunteer work at a rape crisis center even (IIRC). I LOVED the posing contest - and even before that, he did the whole "let me try to pose like these women on covers" thing, just for free. So I really _wanted_ to like the book.

Why did he have to go all (hide spoiler) with this book? And all stereotypical with the females?

I DO NOT KNOW. I never got a good sense of any of the female characters -- the lead vampire(ess) was okay, but kind of a stereotype, the bard wasn't that sympathetic, the shrink and the dryad were....yyyyyeah. And I actually liked that the dryad (view spoiler) but that resolution was....unconvincing. (It was't just the women, I didn't find Ponce or Gutenberg all that convincing either.)

Okay, I never thought about the dryad angle and trees=paper. Creepy.

I KNOW, I was like ".....wait, would she have a problem with books? Yes? No?" I don't think it's even indicated in the text, but shit, it seems like it might be....unsettling.


carol. Now that I think about it, I didn't even discuss (view spoiler) which was so eyerollingly odd that my memory preferred to forget that scene when I wrote my review. Was that a complete non-sequitur or just a delirious interlude??


Moira NOT JUST YOU. I was actually loving the automatons -- so interesting! Actually plausible and thematic! Super fucking creepy! and then, FIGHT SCENE ON THE MOON. That was seriously about when my last spark of goodwill died out and it was just a trudge til the end after then. So dumb.

I did really like how (view spoiler) Unlike her swinging those wooden weapons around all the time.


Moira Actually, come to think of it, that was like the larger problem I had with the book -- there are these awesome wooden sort of super robot golems! and....there's a fight scene on the moon. He can pull stuff out of books! and....it's always the moly, or a lightsabre, or whatever. It was like, here was this great setup with a lot of imaginative details, and all that happened was a bunch of fight scenes. I did really like the trip through the salt mines, but it felt like that also fizzled (and turned into a fight scene). I understand it can't all be "Let's stop to examine the details of this neat worldbuilding!", but....God, so many fight scenes.

It also felt like there were two or three books' worth of material crammed into this one: his apprenticeship, his fall from grace, and the actual events of the book. We never saw the first and we kept getting little flashes of the second, but not enough. It would have worked if it had been maybe 100 pages longer, for me. Or two shorter books.


carol. I agree about the pacing; it was odd and enlarging the details could have benefited the world-building without info-dumping. Fight, discuss; fight, discuss; drive, discuss, fight; repeat.

I was almost disappointed they went into his fall from grace in the detail they did--I had suspected the hints were building for a later book.


Moira If you want to read another series that was much better-written, I enjoyed Lev Grossman's The Magicians and the sequel, the Magician King -- a lot of people I know hated them ("You got your genre in my literary novel!" "You got your stupid literary characters in my fantasy!") but I thought they were really quite good. Same kind of geeky male doing magic atmosphere, but with 100% less attempted Gor reinscription, or whatever the hell that was meant to be.


carol. Hm, I'll take it into consideration. I'm not sure I would like Grossman from what I've heard.


Moira Carol wrote: "Hm, I'll take it into consideration. I'm not sure I would like Grossman from what I've heard."

Yeah, that was what I thought - plus I read some excerpts that were NO GOOD. But whatever it was, once I actually started reading, I was surprised at how much I actually liked it. Maybe...?


message 17: by April (new) - added it

April Chateauneuf You should read the Eyre Affaire by Jasper Fforde. Same book jumping concept. Another great read for book fanatics. His whole Thursday Next series is wonderful.


Moira April wrote: "You should read the Eyre Affaire by Jasper Fforde. Same book jumping concept. Another great read for book fanatics. His whole Thursday Next series is wonderful."

....oh, I hated those. I am totally in the minority (again!), but still.


carol. I like the Eyre Affaire books, although I can only take them a book or two at a time.


Sheherazahde I agree with your review.


carol. Thanks, Sheherazahde. Too bad--I wanted to like it more.


Marsha I think your decision to add "view spoiler" needed to cover more of your review. You show a lot of major plot points in this lengthy review that would definitely spoil it for people who've just picked up the book, especially in your revelation about Lena's character. You make solid comments about the quality of Hines's writing, however, so this is a fair review on your part.


carol. Fair enough, Marsha. I'll edit for spoilers. BTW, I wouldn't recommend following my reviews. I read book blurbs, GR descriptions and usually friend reviews before I ever put a book on my TBR list, so I'm not very sensitive to the issue.


message 24: by Eric (new) - rated it 3 stars

Eric "appeal to geek guys"
Hey, I resent that remark. :-P


carol. You don't resemble it? ;)


back to top