Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Effects of Recent Weather Variations on Winter-Wheat Agronomic Characteristics, and Their Correlations in Jinju, Republic of Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of Useful Eggplant Seedling Transplants Using Multi-View Images
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/agronomy14092018
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrating Heterosis for Root Architecture and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Maize: A Comparison between Hybrids from Different Decades

by
Yuanyuan Li
1,2,†,
Lanfang Bai
1,†,
Shuli Wei
1,
Hao Wu
1,
Rongfa Li
1,
Yongqiang Wang
1 and
Zhigang Wang
1,*
1
College of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China
2
College of Grassland Science, Inner Mongolia Minzu University, Tongliao 028000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors.
Agronomy 2024, 14(9), 2018; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092018
Submission received: 12 July 2024 / Revised: 17 August 2024 / Accepted: 2 September 2024 / Published: 4 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Breeding and Genetics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Exploring the biological potential of maize root architecture is one of the most important ways to improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). The NUE and its heterosis in maize hybrids have improved remarkably over decades. Yet, there is little research on maize hybrid heterosis for root architecture and its possible physiological relationship to heterosis for NUE. A field study lasting two years was carried out on four typical maize hybrids from old and new eras, including their parental inbred lines with two levels of nitrogen (0, 150 kg N ha−1). Compared to old-era maize hybrids, the brace root angle (BA) and crown root angle (CA) of new-era maize hybrids increased by 19.3% and 8.0% under 0 N, and by 18.8% and 7.9% under 150 N, which exhibited a steeper root architecture; the crown root number (CN) of new-era maize hybrids increased by 30.5% and 21.4% under 0 N and 150 N, respectively, which showed a denser root system; meanwhile, the depth of 95% cumulative root weight (D95) of new-era maize hybrids separately increased by 10.5% and 8.5% under 0 N and 150 N, which exhibited a deeper root distribution. This steeper-denser-deeper root architecture enhanced pre-anthesis N uptake and provided a premise of greater post-anthesis N remobilization. All maize hybrids displayed significant heterosis for root architecture compared to their parental inbred lines. The brace root branching (BB) and crown root branching (CB) of new-era maize hybrids and D95 have positive heterosis, while the BA, CA, and CB of old-era maize hybrids, brace root number (BN), and CN have negative heterosis. Regardless of whether root architecture heterosis was positive or negative, new-era maize hybrids showed an overall elevated trend compared to old-era maize hybrids. Structural equation modeling (SEM) showed that heterosis for nitrogen internal efficiency (NIE) was the primary reason for NUE heterosis in maize, influenced by heterosis for root architecture, which was steeper, denser, and deeper. Our results indicated that, compared with old-era maize hybrids, new-era maize hybrids had stronger heterosis for root architecture, which was beneficial to pre-silking nitrogen absorption and is an important physiological basis for the higher NIE heterosis and NUE heterosis in new-era maize hybrids.

1. Introduction

Maize (Zea mays) is a significant staple crop that contributes 36% of the total cereal calories worldwide [1,2]. Additionally, it is known for its efficient utilization of heterosis [3,4]. Increasing maize yield with minimal nitrogen fertilizer input is the inevitable choice of sustainable agricultural development [5,6]. Maize can thrive by enhancing nitrogen recovery efficiency though changes of root system traits, leading to increased nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield [7,8]. The root system has a determining importance for water absorption and nutrient uptake, as it influences crop growth and grain yields [9]. By regulating the growth and development of the root system, improving the ability to absorb and utilize water and nutrients, it plays an important role in improving maize yield and resource utilization efficiency [9].
In maize, there are five principal categories of root: primary, lateral, seminal, crown, and brace roots [10]. The bulk of the mature root biomass is comprised of post-embryonic shoot-borne roots, crown roots which develop beneath the soil surface, and brace roots which emerge above it [10]. Lynch [11] suggested the “steep, cheap, and deep” ideotype for optimal nitrogen acquisition, which showed that maize hybrids with steeper root angles [12,13], smaller crown production [14,15], and fewer but longer laterals [16,17] resulted in deeper rooting and enhanced capture of mobile nutrients from deeper soils [11,18]. Wang [19] found that the evolution of maize varieties over time has led to increased longitudinal extension and transverse contraction. Chen et al. [20] studied root growth, nitrogen uptake, and yield formation using maize varieties that were bred for large-scale promotion in China before and after 1990, and the findings indicated that the modern varieties showed a significant increase in nitrogen accumulation, dry matter production, and yield compared to the pre-1990 varieties at high and low nitrogen levels, while decreasing surface root length density, but there was no significant change in root length density in deeper soils. Liu et al. [21] suggested that the nitrogen absorption and utilization efficiency of modern maize varieties were significantly higher than those of earlier ones. With the variety in turnover, there was an increase in the number of seminal roots, the proportion of roots in the deep soil, and the rooting ability, which was conducive to the absorption of nitrogen. However, the characteristics of evolution over time in root architecture for maize hybrids has not been obtained due to the absence of a dependable phenotypic screening system. Therefore, reviewing the changes in the root system during maize variety turnover was important for an in-depth analysis of the physiological mechanisms of nitrogen use efficiency evolution for maize hybrids.
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is governed by a complex interplay among genotype, environmental conditions, and agronomic strategies [22]. To decipher the impact of root morphology on NUE, an enhanced understanding of specific soil environments and their dynamic changes during the crop lifecycle is crucial [23]. Sciarresi et al. [24] investigated whether newer maize hybrids develop roots more rapidly and extensively than older hybrids, and assessed the influence of management practices and environmental factors on root trait expression. They found that environmental conditions had a significant influence on root trait expression (>41%), with variations in rainfall anomalies and soil bulk density accounting for some of this variability. Meanwhile, Wang et al. [25] examined the correlations between maize yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and inherent soil productivity. They suggested that improving inherent soil productivity could concurrently increase both yield and NUE. Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is influenced by both genetic and physiological factors [26,27]. The maize germplasm exhibits substantial genetic diversity, which is beneficial for traits associated with improved nitrogen uptake [26]. Mueller et al. [27] demonstrated that enhancements in NUE were facilitated by increased nitrogen remobilization in the stem and the retention of nitrogen in leaves during the reproductive phase. Their study analyzed seven maize hybrids, commercialized from 1946 to 2015 by a single seed company, under various nitrogen fertilizer regimes. A comprehensive understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying NUE—such as the dynamics and form of nitrogen storage and remobilization in the stem, along with transporter activity during the grain-filling period—is crucial. This knowledge will aid in devising breeding strategies aimed at selecting genotypes with enhanced nitrogen recovery efficiency (NRE) and NUE.
Heterosis (hybrid vigor) is the phenomenon where heterozygous hybrids outperform their parents in terms of yield, biomass, and resistance [3,28]. Duvick et al. [29] analyzed heterosis changes in maize hybrids for yield and related characteristics using typical hybrids and their parental lines in the U.S. Corn Belt from the 1930s to the 1980s, and the results showed that genetic improvement synchronously contributed to increase in yield of both hybrids and inbreds, and that there was no increase in absolute heterosis of yield. Tollenaar and Liu [30,31,32] systematically analyzed yield heterosis using Canadian maize hybrid combinations and their inbred lines, which, due to the heterosis of leaves, increases dry matter accumulation and harvest index. Previous studies [5,33] have shown that maize nitrogen use efficiency has heterosis, which mainly comes from nitrogen internal efficiency heterosis, and which was ascribed to (i) the gradual improvement of the nitrogen accumulation heterosis in the pre-silking stage, and nitrogen remobilization heterosis in the post-silking stage; (ii) the plant height, the stalk diameter, and the specific stalk and leaf weight at the silking stage in response to an increase in nitrogen application; and (iii) an improvement in the heterosis of grain number and grain nitrogen yield. However, heterosis for root architecture in maize hybrids has not been studied. Hund et al. [34] found that, in the presence of bacteria and other microorganisms, the seedling root growth of hybrids was superior to that of their parental inbred lines, and believed that root growth had heterosis for some hybrids. Wagner et al. [35] observed that environmental factors were also one of the important factors affecting heterosis, with the microbial environment playing a critical role in the development of maize roots.
The NUE and its heterosis have improved remarkably over decades in maize hybrids [27,33,36]. Yet, there is little research on maize hybrid heterosis for root architecture and its possible physiological relationship to the heterosis of NUE [37,38,39,40]. Testing whether root structure has heterosis, and its relationship with heterosis for nitrogen use efficiency, is of great significance for further exploring yield heterosis [41,42] and heterosis for nitrogen use efficiency [43,44]. In this paper, the “Shovelomics” method [45] was adopted to study heterosis for root architecture with four typical maize hybrids from old and new eras, and their parental inbred lines under two N levels (0, 150 kg N ha−1) in a two-year field. We hypothesized that (i) heterosis for root architecture existing in maize hybrids would change over time; and (ii) heterosis for root architecture would be closely related to heterosis for nitrogen use efficiency. The results will provide a scientific foundation for further clarifying the physiological basis behind NUE evolution and its heterosis of maize hybrids.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site

From 2016 to 2017, the field experiment was conducted at an irrigated system on Tumed Right Banner County (40°32′ N, 110°30′ E), Inner Mongolia, China. During the two-year growth period, the total precipitation was 423.1 mm and 350.5 mm, the active accumulated temperature ≥ 10 °C was 3118.7 °C and 3312.0 °C, and the total solar radiation was 3660.1 MJ m−2 and 3976.3 MJ m−2. The previous crop on the test site was maize (Zea mays L.) and the soil was sandy loam.
The top 30 cm of soil was taken before sowing. The soil organic matter, available nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium, and pH were 24.5 g kg−1, 21.2 mg kg−1, 26.7 mg kg−1, 120.4 mg kg−1, and 7.5 in 2016, respectively; and 20.5 mg kg−1, 29.3 mg kg−1, 24.5 mg kg−1, 102.4 mg kg−1, and 7.4 in 2017, respectively.

2.2. Experimental Design

Taking the year 2000 as the boundary, old-era typical maize hybrids Zhongdan 2 (ZD2) and Danyu 13 (DY13), and new-era typical maize hybrids Zhengdan 958 (ZD958) and Xianyu 335 (XY335), and their parental inbred lines with an extension area of more than 5 million acres, were selected as test materials (Table 1).
Fertilization treatment (150 N) and starter fertilizers were uniformly applied with 105 kg ha−1 P2O5, 41 kg ha−1 N (Diammonium phosphate) and 45 kg ha−1 K2O (Potassium sulfate), and a 0–15 cm soil layer was evenly tilled into the soil before planting, while 237 kg ha−1 of urea was applied at the jointing stage of maize (6-leaf stage of maize).
Without nitrogen fertilizer (0 N), potassium chloride and superphosphate were applied, and the amount of phosphorus and potassium fertilizer was the same as that produced with other treatments.
The experiment was a randomized block design with three replications, the plot area was 27 m−2, with a length of 5 m and a row spacing of 0.6 m planted in 9 rows with a planting density of 75,000 plants ha−1. Flood irrigation ensured that the soil field water capacity reached 75%.

2.3. Sampling and Measurements

2.3.1. Root Architecture

The ‘Shovelomics’ method was used to determine root architecture [45]. At the silking stage (R1), 3 maize plants with uniform growth marked after seeding emergence were selected from each plot, and a cylindrical soil block with a 40 cm diameter and 35 cm depth was excavated around it. Afterwards, the unearthed root cap was shaken to eliminate most adhering soil, and then remaining soil particles were washed away with water [48]. Three maize roots were dug for each plot, meanwhile, the index of root architecture was determined [12]: (1) brace root angles (BA) and crown root angles (CA): the BA (the angle between brace roots and horizontal plane) and CA (the angle between crown roots and horizontal plane) were measured with a protractor and recorded as 0° parallel to the horizontal plane, and 90° perpendicular to the horizontal plane; (2) brace root numbers (BN: the number of aerial roots above the surface) and crown root numbers (CN: the number of secondary roots below the surface); (3) brace root branches (BB: 1 cm segments below 5 cm of brace roots and counted the number of branches) and crown root branches (CB: 1 cm segments below 5 cm of crown roots and counted the number of branches); (4) root depth of 95% cumulative root weight (D95: the depth of the soil layer when the root weight reaches 95% from top to bottom) between maize plants, a soil drill with a 5 cm diameter and 60 cm depth was drilled, taking 10 cm as a layer, and then roots were picked up, dried, and weighed, and the following formula was used to calculate D95 [12]:
R L C u m S e g i = ∑ k = 1 i R L S e g   k
where RLCumsegi is the cumulative dry weight of roots in layer i, RLseg k is the root weight of k layer.

2.3.2. Nitrogen and Heterosis Indices

Absolute heterosis (AH) is the specific parameter difference between the F1 generation hybrids and the average value of the parental inbred lines [5,29]:
AH = F1 − MP
MP = (P1 + P2)/2
where P1, P2 are the parameter values of parental inbred lines [5], and F1 is the parameter value of the maize hybrids.
Mid-parent heterosis (MPH) is a method to measure the average performance of the maize hybrids relative to its parental inbred lines [5,30]:
MPH = [(F1 − MP)/MP] ×100
At the R1 stage, 5 continuous and uniform plants were separated into leaves, stalks (stems, leaf sheaths, and tassels), and ears (husk and cobs) [5], while those at the R6 stage were divided into leaves, stalks (stems, leaf sheaths, tassels, ear shanks, husks, and cobs), and grain [5]. The plants were placed in an oven at 105 °C for 30 min, 75 °C to constant weight, and weighed. The dried samples were crushed and sieved, and the nitrogen concentration was determined by the Kjeldahl method.
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) was calculated as the ratio of incremental grain yield response [5] (the difference between the yield of the plot with nitrogen application and that of the plot without nitrogen application) to the application of nitrogen fertilizer [49]. According to Ciampitti and Vyn [50,51], other nitrogen parameters such as Nitrogen recovery efficiency (NRE) and Nitrogen internal efficiency (NIE) were also calculated [5,33]:
NUE = (GYfert − GYunfert)/N fertilizer applied
NRE = (Nuptfert − Nuptunfert)/N fertilizer applied
NIE = (GYfert − GYunfert)/(Nuptfert − Nuptunfert)
where GYfert and GYunfert are grain yield under 150 N and 0 N, respectively; Nuptfert and Nuptunfert are N uptake in 150 N and 0 N, respectively.

2.3.3. Yield and Yield Components

During the physiological maturity stage, two rows in the middle of the measured production area were selected. After removing any side plants, all plants within these selected rows were harvested. The total number of harvested ears was counted. Ten plants exhibiting uniform ear growth were chosen for further analysis to determine ear rows, row grains, 1000-grain weight, and grain water content. The moisture content of the grains was measured using an LDS-1G moisture content detector (Jiangsu WKT Instrumentation Co., LTD, Suzhou, China), and the measurements were then used to calculate the maize yield (converted into hectare yield with 14% water content).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Since most variables of 4 maize hybrids and 8 parental inbred lines were not significantly different, the experimental data were statistically analyzed by averaging the value of two years by SPSS Statistics 22.0 software (IBM, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The least significant difference (LSD) was used for the significance test. Sigma Plot 12.5 software (Systat, Inc., Richmond, CA, USA) was used for drawing the linear model regression and conducting the statistical test of difference (p < 0.05). Origin 2021 software (Origin Lab, Northampton, MA, USA) was used for the heat map. The structural equation model (SEM) was constructed to explore the direct and indirect effects of NUE heterosis in maize hybrids, which was based on a multivariate approach using AMOS software (IBM SPSS AMOS 24.0).

3. Results

3.1. Heterosis for Root Architecture and Its Component Processes

Significant differences were observed in the root architecture (BA, CA, CN, BB, CB, and D95) of both old- and new-era maize hybrids, and BA and BN had significant differences in the parental inbred lines (Table 2). Compared to old-era maize hybrids, the new-era maize hybrids exhibited an increase of 19.3% and 8.0% in BA and CA under 0 N, and 18.8% and 7.9% under 150 N, respectively, indicating steeper root architecture; the CN of new-era maize hybrids increased by 30.5% and 21.4% under 0 N and 150 N, respectively, and the BB and CB of new-era maize hybrids increased by 16.7% and 41.8% under 0 N, and by 15.8% and 29.3% under 150 N, demonstrating a denser root system. Additionally, the D95 of new-era maize hybrids separately increased by 10.5% and 8.5% under 0 N and 150 N, respectively, indicating a deeper root distribution.
The effect of AH and MPH for BA, CA, BB, CB, CN, and D95 was significant (r = 5.0–121.4, p < 0.05), suggesting that heterosis largely depended on the eras of maize hybrids (Table 3). All maize hybrids exhibited significant heterosis for root architecture compared to their parental inbred lines. Among the index of root architecture, BB, CB of new-era maize hybrids, and D95 showed positive heterosis, while BA, CA, and CB of old-era maize hybrids, and BN and CN, had negative heterosis (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The absolute heterosis for brace root angles (AHBA), crown root angles (AHCA), brace root branches (AHBB), crown root branches (AHCB), root depth of the 95% cumulative root weight (AHD95), and mid-parent heterosis for brace root angles (MPHBA), crown root angles (MPHCA), brace root branches (MPHBB), crown root branches (MPHCB), and root depth of the 95% cumulative root weight (MPHD95) of new-era maize hybrids were higher than those of old-era maize hybrids by 61.1%, 59.1%, 82.2%, 165.3%, and 100.6%, and 64.1%, 59.7%, 49.6%, 50.2%, and 92.9%, respectively (Figure 1, Figure 3 and Figure 4). Furthermore, compared with old-era maize hybrids, the absolute heterosis for crown root numbers (AHCN) and mid-parent heterosis for crown root numbers (MPHCN) of new-era maize hybrids increased by 54.1% and 57.3%, respectively (Figure 2).

3.2. Heterosis for Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Its Component Processes

There were significant differences in the NUE, NRE, NIE, VegN, and RepN of old- and new-era maize hybrids, while there were no significant differences in the eras of maize parental inbred lines (Table 4). Compared to old-era maize hybrids, the NUE, NRE, and NIE of new-era maize hybrids increased by 71.1%, 9.3%, and 59.6%, respectively, indicating that NUE was mainly influenced by NIE. The VegN of new-era maize hybrids increased by 19.3% and 26.2% under 0 N and 150 N, respectively, suggesting a significant improvement in VegN. Additionally, the GY of new-era maize hybrids increased by 14.8% under 150 N, indicating a basis for NUE improvement.
NUE, NIE, GY, VegN, and Plant N had positive heterosis, while NRE and RepN had negative heterosis (Table 5). The AH and MPH for NUE, NIE, VegN, and Plant N of new-era maize hybrids were higher than those of old-era maize hybrids by 215.0%, 76.7%, 126.8%, 119.8%, 185.0%, 21.3%, 118.3%, and 120.6%, respectively.
A linear regression analysis was conducted to explore the contribution of MPHNRE and MPHNIE on MPHNUE (Figure 5). The coefficient of determination (R2) of MPHNIE on MPHNUE (53.5–84.0%) was significantly higher than that of MPHNRE on MPHNUE (38.3–64.4%), indicating that NIE played a more substantial role in heterosis for NUE.

3.3. Correlation between Root Architecture Heterosis and Nitrogen Use Efficiency Heterosis

The AHNUE and MPHNUE exhibited significant positive correlations with AHBA and MPHBA, AHCN and MPHCN, AHCB and MPHCB, AHD95 and MPHD95, AHNRE and MPHNRE, and AHNIE and MPHNIE, respectively. Additionally, the AHNRE and MPHNRE significantly positively correlated with AHBA and MPHBA, AHCA and MPHCA, AHCN and MPHCN, AHBB and MPHBB, and AHCB and MPHCB, respectively. The AHBA and MPHBA significantly positively correlated with AHCA and MPHCA, AHCN and MPHCN, AHBB and MPHBB, AHCB and MPHCB, and AHD95 and MPHD95, respectively. Furthermore, the AHCA and MPHCA significantly positively correlated with AHBB and MPHBB, and AHCB and MPHCB, respectively, whereas the AHBN and MPHBN significantly negatively correlated with AHCN and MPHCN, and AHBB and MPHBB, respectively (Figure 6), indicating that root architecture heterosis affected nitrogen use efficiency heterosis.
The SEM was utilized to assess the direct and indirect effects on root architecture and NUE of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 150 N (Figure 7). The analysis revealed that the total variation in AHNUE and MPHNUE were found to be 96% and 88%. Of the considered factors, AH for NIE, D95, BN, CN, BB, and CB directly contributed to AHNUE (Figure 7A), while MPH for NIE and D95 directly contributed to MPHNUE (Figure 7B). The AHNRE and MPHNRE (p < 0.001), as affected by AH and MPH for BA and CA, had negative effects on AHNIE and MPHNIE, respectively. These results indicated that AH and MPH for steeper-denser-deeper root architecture enhanced the effect of AHNIE and MPHNIE, ultimately affecting AHNUE and MPHNUE.

4. Discussion

Root architecture plays a crucial role in water and nutrient uptake [52,53,54,55,56]. Generally, the greater total length, the larger the surface area, and the more nutrients absorbed from the root [57]. During the silking stage, 90% of maize roots are concentrated in the 0–30 cm soil layer, with 80–90% of roots biomass distributed in the 0–20 cm soil layer [58,59]. A robust root system with a rational spatial distribution can delay the senescence of the root system in post-silking stage, thereby fulfilling the nitrogen demand of maize during the filling stage [60,61,62,63]. Chen et al. [64] found a gradual decrease in length, number, and dry weight of root in maize varieties since the 1980s, indicating that maize may decrease the consumption of photosynthetic products by reducing redundant root systems. This study indicates that under the two nitrogen levels, the BB of new-era maize hybrids was higher than old-era maize hybrids, and higher than their parental inbred lines. However, the BN and CN of root architecture in new-era maize hybrids were significantly lower than for the parental inbred lines, indicating that maize hybrids reduced root redundancy compared with parental inbred lines. Nonetheless, the CN of new-era maize hybrids was significantly higher than that of old-era maize hybrids, indicating that there is a limit to the reduction of redundancy (Table 2). The quantity of roots in new-era maize hybrids exhibited an increasing trend, potentially indicating that a lack of roots may not meet the yield demands, and only by increasing the root quantity appropriately can sufficient nutrients be provided for maize yield.
With the passage of time, the increase in maize yield is accompanied by the optimization of root architecture, which indicates that the evolution of maize varieties has led to increased longitudinal tension and lateral contraction [19]. Larry et al. [65] evaluated 16 maize hybrids widely planted in the United States in the past century under the condition of high and low nitrogen, and showed that the root angle of modern maize varieties decreased. Their experimental materials included wild, farmed, and local varieties, which differed from the experiment, which caused inconsistent results. This study demonstrated that the BA, CA, and D95 of new-era maize hybrids were significantly higher than those of old-era maize hybrids under both nitrogen levels, indicating that new-era maize hybrids possessed stronger root piercing ability. Hund et al. [66] used UH005 and UH250 to hybridize at the optimum temperature for lateral root growth at 34 °C and 28 °C. Results showed that when the temperature was 31 °C or lower, the root growth of the hybrid at the seedling stage was better than that of the parent, indicating heterosis in root growth. This study observed heterosis in root architecture of both old- and new-era maize hybrids, with the heterosis in root architecture of new-era maize hybrids being more pronounced compared to that of old-era maize hybrids. These differences were found to be stable, which was manifested by the fact that the BB and CB of new-era maize hybrids, and D95, had positive heterosis, while the BA, CA, and CB of old-era maize hybrids, and the BN and CN, had negative heterosis (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). Both positive and negative heterosis can be considered positive as long as they facilitate nitrogen uptake and accumulation.
Root architecture is a promising breeding target, which has the potential to increase maize yields and food security, while also reducing environmental impacts. The “steep, cheap, and deep” ideotype is beneficial for capturing nitrogen and water [18]. Maintaining an optimized root architecture, and increasing surface area and the volume and dry matter of the root, enhances nitrogen absorption [2]. A study by Chen X et al. [67] indicated that the grain nitrogen content of modern maize varieties decreased, but nitrogen uptake increased, which led to delayed leaf senescence and improved nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), by studying maize varieties from 1973 to 2000. Wang et al. [5] showed that the NUE of maize hybrids and their parental inbred lines increased synchronously, and the evolution of the NUE in maize hybrids was mainly attributed to nitrogen internal efficiency (NIE), while the evolution of the NUE in maize parental inbred lines was mainly attributed to nitrogen recovery efficiency (NRE). The present study showed that vegetative-stage whole plant N uptake, NUE, and NIE of new-era maize hybrids were significantly higher than those of old-era maize hybrids, and all of them were higher than their parental inbred lines (Table 4). The increase in NUE in maize hybrids was mainly due to the increase in NIE. However, the higher NIE was reliant on sufficient pre-anthesis nitrogen accumulation, and nitrogen transport in post-anthesis was mainly related to nitrogen accumulation in pre-anthesis [68,69]. Li et al. [33] found that the significant enhancements in NUE of new-era maize hybrids, and NUE heterosis, increased. In this study, the heterosis for NUE of new-era maize hybrids was significantly higher than that of old-era maize hybrids, and it mainly depended on the heterosis for NIE (Table 5). The coefficients of determinations of MPHNIE on MPHNUE (71.5% of old-era maize hybrids and 84.0% of new-era maize hybrids) were significantly higher than those of MPHNRE on MPHNUE (38.3% of old-era maize hybrids and 64.4% of new-era maize hybrids), which was 28.6% higher on average (Figure 5) and indicated that the NUE heterosis mainly depended on the NIE heterosis.
Establishing an effective root architecture in maize is a crucial approach for enhancing both yield and nitrogen use efficiency [9]. This requires a comprehensive understanding of the intricate relationship between root development and nutrient uptake in maize plants. The SEM demonstrated that AHNIE and MPHNIE, and AHD95 and MPHD95 directly contribute to AHNUE and MPHNUE (Figure 7), which indicated that there were two pathways by which AHNIE and MPHNIE could influence AHNUE and MPHNUE. One pathway was heterosis for denser root architecture (AHBN and MPHBN, AHCN and MPHCN, AHBB and MPHBB, and AHCB and MPHCB), which significantly influenced AHNIE, MPHNIE, AHNUE, and MPHNUE (p < 0.001). The other pathway was heterosis for steeper root architecture (AHBA and MPHBA, and AHCA and MPHCA), which mediated through AHNRE, MPHNRE, and thus AHNIE and MPHNIE, and AHNUE and MPHNUE (p < 0.05). Therefore, heterosis for steeper-denser-deeper root architecture affected heterosis for NIE and NUE.
Increased yields of maize have typically been linked to higher planting densities during the past several decades [46,47]. Rinehart et al. [70] suggested that the pursuit of higher yields has indirectly led to a decrease in the size of the root system in maize over the course of 80 years of breeding. Studies have shown that high planting density can result in a reduction in the root dry weight of maize [71]. As planting density increases, competition for nutrients and water among plants intensifies, potentially leading to higher energy consumption due to excessive crown roots [72]. Shao et al. [73] further demonstrated that, under high planting density conditions, maize plants tend to decrease nodal root number and lateral root growth while maintaining axial root elongation to cope with limited photosynthesis supply from the shoot to the root. Given the current trend towards very high planting densities, it may be worth considering further adaptive changes in root structure to optimize nutrient uptake efficiency. This could include the development of a single layer of brace roots, a moderate number of crown roots, and deeper, thicker roots to enhance penetration and transport capacity for efficient nitrogen uptake [72]. Overall, these findings suggest that there is potential for enhancing maize root structure to improve nutrient uptake and overall plant productivity, particularly in the context of high planting densities.
In this study, only heterosis for the root architecture of maize hybrids from different decades was compared and analyzed, but heterosis for root-and-shoot co-ordination should be further analyzed. Additionally, this study lacks research on heterosis for root physiology, such as heterosis for root exudates and root metabolism. Future studies should consider analyzing heterosis for root physiology and metabolism. Furthermore, examining the complex interactions between plant roots and soil microbes could help in manipulating soil microbial composition and function to enhance nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), crop productivity, and environmental sustainability [74].

5. Conclusions

Compared with old-era maize hybrids, the root architecture of new-era maize hybrids was steeper, deeper, and denser. The increase in NUE in maize hybrids was mainly due to the increase in NIE. The BB and CB of new-era maize hybrids, and D95, showed positive heterosis, whereas BA, CA, and CB of old-era maize hybrids, BN, and CN, showed negative heterosis. With the change in maize hybrids, the increase of BA, CA, and CN not only enhanced root penetration, but also promoted pre-anthesis N absorption and post-anthesis N transport efficiency. The heterosis in steeper-denser-deeper root architecture directly affected the NIE heterosis, ultimately affecting the NUE heterosis. This physiological aspect serves as a crucial foundation for further enhancing NUE heterosis in the new-era maize hybrids.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L., L.B. and Z.W.; methodology, L.B., R.L. and Y.W.; software, S.W., H.W. and Y.W.; formal analysis, Y.L., L.B., S.W. and R.L.; investigation, Y.L., S.W., H.W. and R.L.; resources, Z.W.; data curation, S.W.; writing—original draft, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.L., L.B., H.W., R.L., Y.W. and Z.W.; supervision, Z.W.; project administration, L.B. and Y.W.; funding acquisition, Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the following funding sources: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32160507); the National Key Research and Development Program Project of China (2022YFD1500902-4), the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Key R&D and Achievement Transformation Project (2022YFDZ0041), the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Major Project (2021ZD0003), the Science and Technology for the Development of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Major Project (NMKJXM202111), the Inner Mongolia Agricultural University high-level/excellent doctoral talent introduction scientific research start-up project (NDYB2022-10; NDY B2023-12).

Data Availability Statement

The data reported in this study are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. FAO. FAOStat; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, P.; Wang, Y.Y.; Sheng, D.C.; Zhang, S.A.; Gu, S.C.; Yan, Y.; Zhao, F.C.; Wang, P.; Huang, S.B. Optimizing root system architecture to improve root anchorage strength and nitrogen absorption capacity under high plant density in maize. Field Crops Res. 2023, 303, 109109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, B.B.; Hou, M.; Shi, J.P.; Ku, L.X.; Song, W.; Li, C.H.; Ning, Q.; Li, X.; Li, C.Y.; Zhao, B.B.; et al. De novo genome assembly and analyses of 12 founder inbred lines provide insights into maize heterosis. Nat. Genet. 2023, 55, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Y.X.; Li, C.H.; Yang, J.P.; Yang, H.; Cheng, W.D.; Wang, L.M.; Li, F.Y.; Li, H.Y.; Wang, Y.B.; Li, S.H.; et al. Genetic dissection of heterosis for Huangzaosi, a foundation parental inbred line of maize in China. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2020, 53, 4113–4126. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, Z.G.; Ma, B.L.; Yu, X.F.; Gao, J.L.; Sun, J.Y.; Su, Z.J.; Yu, S.B. Physiological Basis of Heterosis for Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Maize. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cassman, K.G.; Dobermann, A.; Walters, D.T. Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management. Ambio 2002, 31, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Linkohr, B.I.; Williamson, L.C.; Fitter, A.H.; Ottoline Leyser, H.M. Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002, 29, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ren, W.; Zhao, L.F.; Liang, J.X.; Wang, L.F.; Chen, L.M.; Li, P.C.; Liu, Z.G.; Li, X.J.; Zhang, Z.H.; Li, J.P.; et al. Genome-wide dissection of changes in maize root system architecture during modern breeding. Nat. Plants 2022, 8, 1408–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lai, Z.L.; Zhang, H.; Ding, X.H.; Liao, Z.Q.; Zhang, C.; Yu, J.; Pei, S.Z.; Dou, Z.Y.; Li, Z.J.; Fan, J.L. Ridge-furrow film mulch with nitrogen fertilization improves grain yield of dryland maize by promoting root growth, plant nitrogen uptake and remobilization. Soil Tillage Res. 2024, 241, 106118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pace, J.; Gardner, C.; Romay, C.; Ganapathysubramanian, B.; LÜbberstedt, T. Genome-wide association analysis of seedling root development in maize (Zea mays L.). BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lynch, J.P. Steep, cheap and deep: An ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Ann. Bot. 2013, 112, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Trachsel, S.; Kaeppler, S.M.; Brown, K.M.; Lynch, J.P. Maize root growth angles become steeper under low N conditions. Field Crops Res. 2013, 140, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dathe, A.; Postma, J.A.; Postma-Blaauw, M.B.; Lynch, J.P. Impact of axial root growth angles on nitrogen acquisition in maize depends on environmental conditions. Ann. Bot. 2016, 118, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Saengwilai, P.; Nord, E.A.; Chimungu, J.; Brown, K.M.; Lynch, J.P. Root cortical aerenchyma enhances nitrogen acquisition from low nitrogen soils in maize. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Saengwilai, P.; Tian, X.; Lynch, J. Low crown root number enhances nitrogen acquisition from low-nitrogen soils in maize. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Postma, J.A.; Dathe, A.; Lynch, J.P. The optimal lateral root branching density for maize depends on nitrogen and phosphorous availability. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 590–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, A.; Lynch, J.P. Reduced frequency of lateral root branching improves N capture from low-N soils in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2055–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lynch, J.P. Root phenotypes for improved nutrient capture: An underexploited opportunity for global agriculture. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 548–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, K.J.; Zheng, H.J.; Liu, K.C.; Zhang, J.W.; Dong, S.T.; Hu, C.H. Evolution of maize root distribution in space-time during maize varieties replacing in China. Acta Phytoecol. Sin. 2001, 25, 472–475. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, F.J.; Fang, Z.G.; Gao, Q.; Ye, Y.L.; Jia, L.L.; Yuan, L.X.; Mi, G.H.; Zhang, F.S. Evaluation of the yield and nitrogen use efficiency of the dominant maize hybrids grown in North and Northeast China. Sci. Sin. Vitae 2013, 43, 342–350. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, M.; Wu, G.J.; Lu, D.X.; Xu, Z.H.; Dong, S.T.; Zhang, J.W.; Zhao, B.; Li, G.; Liu, P. Improvement of nitrogen use efficiency and the relationship with root system characters of maize cultivars in different years. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. 2017, 23, 71–82. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Asibi, A.E.; Chai, Q.; Coulter, J.A. Mechanisms of Nitrogen Use in Maize. Agronomy 2019, 9, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Garnett, T.; Conn, V.; Kaiser, B.N. Root based approaches to improving nitrogen use efficiency in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 1272–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sciarresi, C.; Thies, A.; Topp, C.; Eudy, D.; Trifunovic, S.; Ruiz, A.; Dixon, P.M.; Miguez, F.; Burras, L.C.; Archontoulis, S.V. Do newer maize hybrids grow roots faster and deeper? Crop Sci. 2024, 64, 1559–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Z.G.; Ma, B.L.; Li, Y.J.; Li, R.F.; Jia, Q.; Yu, X.F.; Sun, J.Y.; Hu, S.P.; Gao, J.L. Concurrent improvement in maize grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency by enhancing inherent soil productivity. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 790188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wani, S.H.; Vijayan, R.; Choudhary, M.; Kumar, A.; Zaid, A.; Singh, V.; Kumar, P.; Yasin, J.K. Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE): Elucidated mechanisms, mapped genes and gene networks in maize (Zea mays L.). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 2875–2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mueller, S.M.; Messina, C.D.; Vyn, T.J. Simultaneous gains in grain yield and nitrogen efficiency over 70 years of maize genetic improvement. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.B.; Han, T.T.; Bai, A.M.; Xu, H.H.; Wang, J.J.; Hou, X.L.; Li, Y. Potential regulatory networks and heterosis for flavonoid and terpenoid contents in Pak Choi: Metabolomic and transcriptome analyses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Duvick, D.N. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv. Agron. 2005, 86, 83–145. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tollenaar, M.; Ahmadzadeh, A.; Lee, E.A. Physiological basis of heterosis for grain yield in maize. Crop Sci. 2004, 44, 2086–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tollenaar, M.; Deen, W.; Echarte, L.; Liu, W. Effect of crowding stress on dry matter accumulation and harvest index in maize. Agron. J. 2006, 98, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, W.D.; Tollenaar, M. Response of yield heterosis to increasing plant density in maize. Crop Sci. 2009, 49, 1807–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, R.F.; Gao, J.L.; Li, Y.Y.; Yu, S.B.; Wang, Z.G. Heterosis for nitrogen use efficiency of maize hybrids enhanced over decades in China. Agriculture 2022, 12, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hund, A.; Reimer, R.; Stamp, P.; Walter, A. Can we improve heterosis for root growth of maize by selecting parental inbred lines with different temperature behaviour? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 367, 1580–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wagner, M.R.; Tang, C.; Salvato, F.; Clouse, K.M.; Bartlett, A.; Vintila, S.; Phillips, L.; Sermons, S.; Hoffmann, M.; Balint-Kurti, P.J.; et al. Microbe-dependent heterosis in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2021965118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Haegele, J.W.; Cook, K.A.; Nichols, D.M.; Below, F.E. Changes in nitrogen use traits associated with genetic improvement for grain yield of maize hybrids released in different decades. Crop Sci. 2013, 53, 1256–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hoecker, N.; Keller, B.; Piepho, H.P.; Hochholdinger, F. Manifestation of heterosis during early maize (Zea mays L.) root development. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 112, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, M.M.; Lu, X.M.; Sun, X.J.; Yang, H.L.; Yan, P.S.; Du, H.W.; Chen, X.Y.; Tang, J.H. Heterotic loci analysis for root traits of maize seedlings using an SSSL test population under different nitrogen conditions. Mol. Breed. 2020, 40, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, X.; He, K.; Ali, F.; Li, D.; Cai, H.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, L.; Liu, W.; Mi, G.; Chen, F.; et al. Genetic dissection of N use efficiency using maize inbred lines and testcrosses. Crop J. 2023, 11, 1242–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, H.; Wu, Y.J.; An, T.T.; Chen, Y.L. Lateral root elongation enhances nitrogen-use efficiency in maize genotypes at the seedling stage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 5389–5398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, W.D.; Tollenaar, M. Physiological mechanisms underlying heterosis for shade tolerance in maize. Crop Sci. 2009, 49, 1817–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tollenaar, M.T.; Lee, E.A. Strategies for enhancing grain yield in maize. Plant Breed. Rev. 2011, 34, 37–82. [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen, K.; Vyn, T.J. Post-silking Factor Consequences for N Efficiency Changes Over 38 Years of Commercial Maize Hybrids. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1737–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mastrodomenico, A.T.; Hendrix, C.C.; Below, F.E. Nitrogen use efficiency and the genetic variation of maize expired plant variety protection germplasm. Agriculture 2018, 8, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Trachsel, S.; Kaeppler, S.M.; Brown, K.M.; Lynch, J.P. Shovelomics: High throughput phenotyping of maize (Zea mays, L.) root architecture in the field. Plant Soil 2011, 341, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ma, D.L.; Li, S.K.; Zhai, L.C.; Yu, X.F.; Xie, R.Z.; Gao, J.L. Response of maize barrenness to density and nitrogen increases in Chinese cultivars released from the 1950s to 2010s. Field Crops Res. 2020, 250, 107766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ma, D.L.; Yu, X.F.; Ming, B.; Li, S.K.; Xie, R.Z.; Gao, J.L. Maize nitrogen use efficiency improved due to density tolerance increase since the 1950s. Agronomy 2020, 112, 1537–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cai, H.G.; Chen, F.J.; Mi, G.H.; Zhang, F.S.; Maurer, H.P.; Liu, W.X.; Reif, J.C.; Yuan, L.X. Mapping QTLs for root system architecture of maize (Zea mays L.) in the field at different developmental stages. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125, 1313–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cassman, K.G.; Dobermann, A.; Walters, D.T.; Yang, H.S. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2003, 28, 315–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ciampitti, I.A.; Vyn, T.J. A comprehensive study of plant density consequences on nitrogen uptake dynamics of maize plants from vegetative to reproductive stages. Field Crops Res. 2011, 121, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ciampitti, I.A.; Murrell, S.T.; Camberato, J.J.; Tuinstra, M.; Xia, Y.B.; Friedemann, P.; Vyn, T.J. Physiological dynamics of maize nitrogen uptake and partitioning in response to plant density and nitrogen stress factors: II. Reproductive phase. Crop Sci. 2013, 53, 2588–2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chun, L.; Chen, F.J.; Zhang, F.S.; Mi, G.H. Root growth, nitrogen uptake and yield formation of hybrid maize with different N efficiency. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. 2005, 11, 615–619. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  53. Peng, Y.F.; Niu, J.F.; Peng, Z.P.; Zhang, F.S.; Li, C.J. Shoot growth potential drives N uptake in maize plants and correlates with root growth in the soil. Field Crops Res. 2010, 115, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mackay, A.D.; Barber, S.A. Effect of Nitrogen on Root Growth of Two Corn Genotypes in the Field. Agron. J. 1986, 78, 699–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Coque, M.; Gallais, A. Genomic regions involved in response to grain yield selection at high and low nitrogen fertilization in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 112, 1205–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sha, Y.; Liu, Z.; Hao, Z.H.; Huang, Y.W.; Shao, H.; Feng, G.Z.; Chen, F.J.; Mi, G.H. Root growth, root senescence and root system architecture in maize under conservative strip tillage system. Plant Soil 2024, 495, 253–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sattelmacher, B.; Gerendas, J.; Thoms, K.; BrÜck, H.; Bagdady, N.H. Interaction between root growth and mineral nutrition. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1993, 33, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dwyer, L.M.; Ma, B.L.; Stewart, D.W.; Hayhoe, H.N.; Balchin, D.; Culley, J.L.B. Root mass distribution under conventional and conservation tillage. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1996, 76, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Guo, S.; Liu, Z.G.; Zhou, Z.J.; Lu, T.Q.; Chen, S.H.; He, M.J.; Zeng, X.Z.; Chen, K.; Yu, H.; Shangguan, Y.X.; et al. Root system architecture differences of maize cultivars affect yield and nitrogen accumulation in Southwest China. Agriculture 2022, 12, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wiesler, F.; Horst, W.J. Differences between Maize Cultivars in Yield Formation, Nitrogen Uptake and associated Depletion of Soil Nitrate. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1992, 168, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wiesler, F.; Horst, W.J. Differences among maize cultivars in the utilization of soil nitrate and the related losses of nitrate through leaching. Plant Soil 1993, 151, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wiesler, F.; Horst, W.J. Root growth and nitrate utilization of maize cultivars under field conditions. Plant Soil 1994, 163, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, J.X.; Chen, F.J.; Olokhnuud, C.; Glass, A.D.M.; Tong, Y.P.; Zhang, F.S.; Mi, G.H. Root size and nitrogen-uptake activity in two maize (Zea mays) inbred lines differing in nitrogen-use efficiency. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2009, 172, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, X.C.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.L.; Li, Q.; Chen, F.J.; Yuan, L.X.; Mi, G.H. Changes in root size and distribution in relation to nitrogen accumulation during maize breeding in China. Plant Soil 2014, 374, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. York, L.M.; Galindo-Castaneda, E.T.; Schussler, J.R.; Lynch, J.P. Evolution of US maize (Zea mays L.) root architectural and anatomical phenes over the past 100 years corresponds to increased tolerance of nitrogen stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2347–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hund, A. Genetic variation in the gravitropic response of maize roots to low temperatures. Plant Root 2010, 4, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, X.C.; Chen, F.J.; Chen, Y.L.; Gao, Q.; Yang, X.L.; Yuan, L.X.; Zhang, F.S.; Mi, G.H. Modern maize hybrids in Northeast China exhibit increased yield potential and resource use efficiency despite adverse climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 923–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ciampitii, I.A.; Vyn, T.J. Physiological perspectives of changes over time in maize yield dependency on nitrogen uptake and associated nitrogen efficiencies: A review. Field Crops Res. 2012, 133, 48–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fan, P.P.; Ming, B.; Evers, J.B.; Li, Y.Y.; Li, S.K.; Xie, R.Z.; Anten, N.P.R. Nitrogen availability determines the vertical patterns of accumulation, partitioning, and reallocation of dry matter and nitrogen in maize. Field Crops Res. 2023, 297, 108927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rinehart, B.; Borras, L.; Salmeron, M.; McNear, D.H.; Poffenbarger, H. Commercial maize hybrids have smaller root systems after 80 years of breeding. Rhizosphere 2024, 30, 100915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yu, P.; Li, X.X.; White, P.J.; Li, C.J. A large and deep root system underlies high nitrogen-use efficiency in maize production. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, F.J.; Liu, J.C.; Liu, Z.G.; Chen, Z.; Ren, W.; Gong, X.P.; Wang, L.F.; Cai, H.G.; Pan, Q.C.; Yuan, L.X.; et al. Breeding for high-yield and nitrogen use efficiency in maize: Lessons from comparison between Chinese and US cultivars. Agronomy 2021, 166, 251–275. [Google Scholar]
  73. Shao, H.; Xia, T.T.; Wu, D.L.; Chen, F.J.; Mi, G.H. Root growth and root system architecture of field-grown maize in response to high planting density. Plant Soil 2018, 430, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wen, G.Q.; Ma, B.L. Chapter six—Optimizing crop nitrogen use efficiency: Integrating root performance and machine learning into nutrient management. Agronomy 2024, 187, 311–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agronomy 14 02018 g001
Figure 1. Comparison of AH and MPH for BA (A,C) and CA (B,D) of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 0 N and 150 N. AH: absolute heterosis. MPH: mid-parent heterosis. BA: brace root angles. CA: crown root angles. ns, differences in nitrogen application between old- and new-era maize hybrids were not significant (p > 0.05).
Figure 1. Comparison of AH and MPH for BA (A,C) and CA (B,D) of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 0 N and 150 N. AH: absolute heterosis. MPH: mid-parent heterosis. BA: brace root angles. CA: crown root angles. ns, differences in nitrogen application between old- and new-era maize hybrids were not significant (p > 0.05).
Agronomy 14 02018 g001
Agronomy 14 02018 g002
Figure 2. Comparison of AH and MPH for BN (A,C) and CN (B,D) of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 0 N and 150 N. AH: absolute heterosis. MPH: mid-parent heterosis. BN: brace root numbers. CN: crown root numbers. ns, differences in nitrogen application between old- and new-era maize hybrids were not significant (p > 0.05); *, significant differences were observed between old- and new-era maize hybrids under nitrogen application (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Comparison of AH and MPH for BN (A,C) and CN (B,D) of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 0 N and 150 N. AH: absolute heterosis. MPH: mid-parent heterosis. BN: brace root numbers. CN: crown root numbers. ns, differences in nitrogen application between old- and new-era maize hybrids were not significant (p > 0.05); *, significant differences were observed between old- and new-era maize hybrids under nitrogen application (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 14 02018 g002
Agronomy 14 02018 g003
Figure 3. Comparison of AH and MPH for BB (A,C) and CB (B,D) of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 0 N and 150 N. AH: absolute heterosis. MPH: mid-parent heterosis. BB: brace root branches. CB: crown root branches. ns, differences in nitrogen application between old- and new-era maize hybrids were not significant (p > 0.05).
Figure 3. Comparison of AH and MPH for BB (A,C) and CB (B,D) of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 0 N and 150 N. AH: absolute heterosis. MPH: mid-parent heterosis. BB: brace root branches. CB: crown root branches. ns, differences in nitrogen application between old- and new-era maize hybrids were not significant (p > 0.05).
Agronomy 14 02018 g003
Agronomy 14 02018 g004
Figure 4. Comparison of AH (A) and MPH (B) for D95 of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 0 N and 150 N. D95: root depth of 95% cumulative root weight. ns, differences in nitrogen application between old- and new-era maize hybrids were not significant (p > 0.05); *, significant differences were observed between old- and new-era maize hybrids under nitrogen application (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Comparison of AH (A) and MPH (B) for D95 of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 0 N and 150 N. D95: root depth of 95% cumulative root weight. ns, differences in nitrogen application between old- and new-era maize hybrids were not significant (p > 0.05); *, significant differences were observed between old- and new-era maize hybrids under nitrogen application (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 14 02018 g004
Agronomy 14 02018 g005
Figure 5. Coefficient of determination of MPHNUE versus MPHNRE and MPHNIE of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 150 N.
Figure 5. Coefficient of determination of MPHNUE versus MPHNRE and MPHNIE of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 150 N.
Agronomy 14 02018 g005
Agronomy 14 02018 g006
Figure 6. Relationship of AH (A) and MPH (B) for the related components of root architecture and NUE of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 150 N. AHBA: absolute heterosis for brace root angles. AHCA: absolute heterosis for crown root angles. AHBN: absolute heterosis for brace root numbers. AHCN: absolute heterosis for crown root numbers. AHBB: absolute heterosis for brace root branches. AHCB: absolute heterosis for crown root branches. AHD95: absolute heterosis for root depth of 95% cumulative root weight. AHNRE: absolute heterosis for nitrogen recovery efficiency. AHNIE: absolute heterosis for nitrogen internal efficiency. AHNUE: absolute heterosis for nitrogen use efficiency. MPHBA: mid-parent heterosis for brace root angles. MPHCA: mid-parent heterosis for crown root angles. MPHBN: mid-parent heterosis for brace root numbers. MPHCN: mid-parent heterosis for crown root numbers. MPHBB: mid-parent heterosis for brace root branches. MPHCB: mid-parent heterosis for crown root branches. MPHD95: mid-parent heterosis for root depth of 95% cumulative root weight. MPHNRE: mid-parent heterosis for nitrogen recovery efficiency. MPHNIE: mid-parent heterosis for nitrogen internal efficiency. MPHNUE: mid-parent heterosis for nitrogen use efficiency. **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Relationship of AH (A) and MPH (B) for the related components of root architecture and NUE of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 150 N. AHBA: absolute heterosis for brace root angles. AHCA: absolute heterosis for crown root angles. AHBN: absolute heterosis for brace root numbers. AHCN: absolute heterosis for crown root numbers. AHBB: absolute heterosis for brace root branches. AHCB: absolute heterosis for crown root branches. AHD95: absolute heterosis for root depth of 95% cumulative root weight. AHNRE: absolute heterosis for nitrogen recovery efficiency. AHNIE: absolute heterosis for nitrogen internal efficiency. AHNUE: absolute heterosis for nitrogen use efficiency. MPHBA: mid-parent heterosis for brace root angles. MPHCA: mid-parent heterosis for crown root angles. MPHBN: mid-parent heterosis for brace root numbers. MPHCN: mid-parent heterosis for crown root numbers. MPHBB: mid-parent heterosis for brace root branches. MPHCB: mid-parent heterosis for crown root branches. MPHD95: mid-parent heterosis for root depth of 95% cumulative root weight. MPHNRE: mid-parent heterosis for nitrogen recovery efficiency. MPHNIE: mid-parent heterosis for nitrogen internal efficiency. MPHNUE: mid-parent heterosis for nitrogen use efficiency. **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05.
Agronomy 14 02018 g006
Agronomy 14 02018 g007
Figure 7. The SEM showed the potential mechanism for the relationship of root architecture and NUE of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 150 N. Figure (A) shows the relationship of absolute heterosis for root architecture and NUE, Figure (B) shows the relationship of mid-parent heterosis for root architecture and NUE. Solid and black lines represent positive significance; dashed and black lines represent negative significance; dashed and grey lines represent no significance. Numbers on the arrows represent the standardized path coefficients (p), while the width of the arrows represent the strength of p. R2 represents the explained percentage of variance by the predictors. ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05. Steeper root architecture, AH and MPH for BA and CA; denser root architecture, AH and MPH for BN, CN, BB, and CB; deeper root architecture, AH and MPH for D95.
Figure 7. The SEM showed the potential mechanism for the relationship of root architecture and NUE of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 150 N. Figure (A) shows the relationship of absolute heterosis for root architecture and NUE, Figure (B) shows the relationship of mid-parent heterosis for root architecture and NUE. Solid and black lines represent positive significance; dashed and black lines represent negative significance; dashed and grey lines represent no significance. Numbers on the arrows represent the standardized path coefficients (p), while the width of the arrows represent the strength of p. R2 represents the explained percentage of variance by the predictors. ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05. Steeper root architecture, AH and MPH for BA and CA; denser root architecture, AH and MPH for BN, CN, BB, and CB; deeper root architecture, AH and MPH for D95.
Agronomy 14 02018 g007
Table 1. Details of old- and new-era maize hybrids, and parental inbred lines.
Table 1. Details of old- and new-era maize hybrids, and parental inbred lines.
Era of HybridsHybridsParental CombinationYear of Hybrid ReleaseInstitution That
Developed the Cultivar
Old-era hybridsZhongdan 2 (ZD2)Mo17 × Zi 3301972 [46,47]Chinese AAS, Beijing, China
Danyu 13 (DY13)Mo17 × E 281981 [46,47]Dandong AAS of Liaoning Province, Dandong, China
New-era hybridsZhengdan 958 (ZD958)Zheng 58 × Chang 7-22000 [46,47]Luohe AAS of Henan Province, Luohe, China
Xianyu 335 (XY335)PH6WC × PH4CV2004 [46,47]The Tieling Pioneer limited company, Tieling, China
Table 2. The related components of root architecture in old- and new-era maize hybrids, and parental inbred lines under 0, 150 N.
Table 2. The related components of root architecture in old- and new-era maize hybrids, and parental inbred lines under 0, 150 N.
IndexBA (°)CA (°)BNCNBBCBD95 (cm)
0 N150 N0 N150 N0 N150 N0 N150 N0 N150 N0 N150 N0 N150 N
Old-era hybrids45.0c43.1c53.8b51.6b12.2c14.3b19.7c22.9c15.6b17.1b13.4c14.7c50.6b47.1b
New-era hybrids53.7b51.2b58.1a55.7a13.1bc15.2b25.7b27.8b18.2a19.8a19.0a19.0a55.9a51.1a
Old-era inbred lines52.3b50.4b59.2a56.6a13.7b15.1b25.3b29.6a13.6c15.6c15.4b16.9b47.8c44.8c
New-era inbred lines56.2a54.3a59.9a58.1a15.6a16.5a28.6a30.6a15.0bc16.4c15.2b15.9b49.3bc47.0b
Source of variation
Hybrids (H)********nsns****************
Inbred lines (I)**nsns***nsnsnsnsnsns*
N rates (N)*****ns**
H × Nnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
I × Nnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
BA: brace root angles. CA: crown root angles. BN: brace root numbers. CN: crown root numbers. BB: brace root branches. CB: crown root branches. D95: root depth of 95% cumulative root weight. Different letters in a column indicated significant variance under 0 N and 150 N, respectively (p < 0.05). ns, not significant variance; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.
Table 3. Mean squares from the ANOVA of AH and MPH for root architecture of old- and new-era maize hybrids (F value).
Table 3. Mean squares from the ANOVA of AH and MPH for root architecture of old- and new-era maize hybrids (F value).
Heterotic IndexSource of Variation
Eras (E)N Rates (N)(E × N)
Absolute heterosis (AH)
BA20.14 **0.090.07
CA9.94 **0.010.21
BB4.98 *0.040.25
CB121.44 **1.010.33
BN0.237.95 *1.51
CN11.69 **0.240.29
D9511.32 *1.030.43
Mid-parent heterosis (MPH)
BA27.75 **0.340.01
CA10.77 **0.020.07
BB6.38 *0.340.36
CB108.60 **0.790.78
BN1.078.16 *1.16
CN16.65 **0.020.02
D9513.10 *0.080.56
*, indicates slope significance at p < 0.05; **, indicates slope significance at p < 0.01.
Table 4. The GY, VegN, RepN, Plant N, NUE, NRE, and NIE of old- and new-era maize hybrids and parental inbred lines under 0, 150 N.
Table 4. The GY, VegN, RepN, Plant N, NUE, NRE, and NIE of old- and new-era maize hybrids and parental inbred lines under 0, 150 N.
IndexGY
(Mg ha−1)		VegN
(kg ha−1)		RepN
(kg ha−1)		Plant N
(kg ha−1)		NUE
(kg kg−1)		NRE
(kg kg−1)		NIE
(kg kg−1)
0 N150 N0 N150 N0 N150 N0 N150 N150 N150 N150 N
Old-era hybrids10.8a12.8b115.6b153.3b40.3b66.4a155.9b219.7b13.5b0.43c31.7b
New-era hybrids11.2a14.7a137.9a193.5a39.5b53.7b177.4a247.2a23.1a0.47c50.6a
Old-era inbred lines6.7b8.2c61.1c125.7c41.1a68.8a102.2c194.5c9.5c0.62a14.5d
New-era inbred lines7.4b9.0c69.9c130.9c42.9a60.9a112.8c191.8c10.5c0.53b21.2c
Source of variation
Hybrids (H)ns******ns********ns*
Inbred lines (I)nsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns**
N rates (N)********---
H × Nnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns---
I × Nnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns---
GY: grain yield. VegN: vegetative-stage N uptake. RepN: reproductive stage N uptake. Plant N: N content at maturity. NUE: nitrogen use efficiency. NRE: nitrogen recovery efficiency. NIE: nitrogen internal efficiency. Different letters in a column indicate significant variance under 0 N and 150 N, respectively (p < 0.05). ns, no significant variance; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.
Table 5. The AH and MPH for GY, VegN, RepN, Plant N, NUE, NRE, and NIE of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 150 N.
Table 5. The AH and MPH for GY, VegN, RepN, Plant N, NUE, NRE, and NIE of old- and new-era maize hybrids under 150 N.
IndexAHMPH (%)
Old-Era HybridsNew-Era HybridsOld-Era HybridsNew-Era Hybrids
GY4.1a3.8a55.4a61.7a
VegN27.6b62.6a21.9b47.8a
RepN−2.4a−7.2a−3.5a−11.8a
Plant N25.2b55.4a13.1b28.9a
NUE4.0b12.6a42.1b120.0a
NRE−0.2b−0.1a−22.3a−11.3a
NIE17.2b30.4a118.4b143.6a
Different letters indicate significant variance among new- and old-era maize hybrids (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Bai, L.; Wei, S.; Wu, H.; Li, R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z. Integrating Heterosis for Root Architecture and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Maize: A Comparison between Hybrids from Different Decades. Agronomy 2024, 14, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092018

AMA Style

Li Y, Bai L, Wei S, Wu H, Li R, Wang Y, Wang Z. Integrating Heterosis for Root Architecture and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Maize: A Comparison between Hybrids from Different Decades. Agronomy. 2024; 14(9):2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yuanyuan, Lanfang Bai, Shuli Wei, Hao Wu, Rongfa Li, Yongqiang Wang, and Zhigang Wang. 2024. "Integrating Heterosis for Root Architecture and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Maize: A Comparison between Hybrids from Different Decades" Agronomy 14, no. 9: 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092018

APA Style

Li, Y., Bai, L., Wei, S., Wu, H., Li, R., Wang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024). Integrating Heterosis for Root Architecture and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Maize: A Comparison between Hybrids from Different Decades. Agronomy, 14(9), 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092018

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop