The correlation between comfort and friction, and the possibility of predicting the in vivo performance of CLs, based on in vitro experiments, motivated the carrying out of some studies on the tribological characterization of CLs, using commercially available or adapted tribometers. Zhou et al. (2011) tested senofilcon A-based CL submerged in saline solution against a stainless steel sphere. For loads between 0.5 and 100 mN and sliding speeds between 0.01 and 0.5 cm/s, 𝜇 values were obtained between 0.0001 and 0.11. Under these conditions, the first law of friction was verified, that is, there was a proportionality between the friction force and the applied load [
4]. Additionally, they investigated the dependence of friction on sliding speed and, after adjusting the power law, concluded that the friction coefficient is proportional to V
0.23. The result suggested that there is a strong attraction between senofilcon A and stainless steel, which is attributed to the low water content of CL and the larger areas resulting from solid – solid contact [
4]. Rennie et al. (2005) assumed that the CL can be reasonably modeled as a modified Winkler surface. Therefore, they carried out CL tests based on etafilcon A, using a borosylate glass sphere as a pin, normal loads of 3 to 20 mN and speeds of 63 to 6280 μm/s. The obtained values of 𝜇 varied between 0.025 and 0.075 and the friction forces between 0.5 and 2.0 mN, depending on the normal load and sliding speed. Finally, they suggested that the majority of frictional forces were a consequence of viscoelastic dissipation of the contact lens material and interfacial shear within the contact [
5]. Dunn et al. (2013) carried out microtribological tests on a delefilcon A-based contact lens with a spherical borosilicate glass probe. At low contact pressures (6 - 30 kPa) and low sliding speeds (5 - 200 μm/s) they generated average friction coefficients lower than 0.02. For loads of 1000 μN and speeds of 2 μm/s, values of 𝜇 were equal to 0.5 and 0.021 for loads of 500 μN [
6]. To study the tribological differences between CL of different materials and brands, Roba et al. (2011) carried out tests on several commercially available CLs, including somofilcon A and nelfilcon A. To represent the surface of the eyelid, glass discs with different functionalizations were evaluated and the surface of the CLs was covered with a lubricating solution during friction tests. [
7]. The comparative tests involved normal forces between 0.25 and 5 mN and velocities of 0.1 mm/s. They reported values of 𝜇 from 0.011 to 0.562, depending on the type of contact lens, and, in general, HSCL (hydrogel silicone contact lenses) presented less friction than hydrogel lenses [
7]. Nann and Tighe (2016) tested the 𝜇 value of 18 commercially available lenses using a modified nanotribometer. The aim of the study was to compare a range of conventional hydrogel materials with silicone ones. To achieve this, the CLs were lubricated with HypotearsTM lubricant on a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate. The test conditions were 30 mN of normal load, sliding speed of 30 mm/min and a sliding distance of 20 mm. They concluded that, in general, hydrogel lenses have higher 𝜇 values than HSCL [
8]. Regarding the lubricating solutions and artificial tears available on the market for the contact lens to remain moist and thus reduce the symptoms of eye irritation and dryness [
9], Nairn and Jiang (1995) measured the coefficient of friction of polymacon-based CL with various ophthalmic solutions. They used a polycarbonate disc as an antagonist material, under contact pressures of 3.5 kPa and obtained a 𝜇 value of 0.640 without lubricant [
10]. With the aim of studying the influence of lubricants, Nairn and Jiang (1995) concluded that the higher the viscosity of the lubricant, the lower the friction coefficient, that is, the greater the lubrication. This lubrication of the CL was observed in the mixed lubrication regime, that is, when there is contact between the sliding surfaces and, therefore, the friction coefficient is influenced by both the lubricating properties and the surface properties of the CL [
10]. With the aim of understanding whether CL processing leads to differences in the properties between the posterior and anterior surfaces, Nairn and Jiang (1995) also studied the value of 𝜇 of the anterior and posterior surface of the SeeQuence® and SeeQuence®2 lenses while sliding over a PMMA (
Poly(
methyl methacrylate)) disc and a pHEMA (
Poly(2-
hydroxyethyl methacrylate)) disc, lubricated by a saline solution [
10]. They found that the friction coefficient for the anterior surface is always greater than that for the posterior surface, a consequence of the greater sliding movement on the anterior surface than on the posterior surface. Therefore, the coefficient of friction for the anterior surface is probably the most important in determining the comfort of the CL. From the results obtained, Nairn and Jiang (1995) suggest that there is potential to reduce friction on the anterior surface of the CL through, for example, variation in processing methods [
10]. Sterner et al. (2016) investigated how the 𝜇 value of HSCL materials, acquired at low sliding speeds, is affected by the buffer component and organic composition of the lubricant, and by prolonged exposure to teardrop fluid (FTL). The 𝜇 value of several commercially available CLs (etafilcon A, nelficon A and senofilcon A) was characterized using microtribometry against a mucin-coated glass disk, tested under different lubricating solutions, including an FTL containing proteins and lipids [
3] To determine friction, normal loads between 0.25 and 4 mN were chosen, corresponding to a contact pressure range of 1 to 7 kPa, and a sliding speed of 0.1 mm/s. They obtained values of 𝜇 between 0.01 and 0.1 [
3].
Silva et al. (2015) investigated the effect of the presence of albumin and cholesterol in the lubricating medium on the friction response of two hydrogels used in CL, a hydrogel based on hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) (HEMA/PVP) and another based on silicone (TRIS/NVP/HEMA). Tribological tests were carried out using a PMMA sphere as a counterbody and water as a lubricant, in addition to solutions with the biomolecules under study. Reciprocal movement tests were carried out with normal forces of 20 mN and sliding speeds of 7 mm/s. In the absence of biomolecules, the friction coefficient was quite similar for both hydrogels, with values between 0.25 and 0.3. They observed a significant increase in friction for HEMA/PVP when the lubricant included cholesterol and for TRIS/NVP/HEMA when it contained albumin [
11]. Urueña et al. (2011) studied the influence of hyaluronic acid as a lubricant in CL systems. Two types of commercially available CL were tested (senofilcon A and balafilcon A), different lubricant concentrations, loads and speeds. Using a borosilicate glass pin, normal loads between 2 and 20 mN, sliding speeds of 20 to 3600 μm/s, they verified values of 𝜇 of the order of magnitude of 0.6 in saline solution and a significant reduction of this value in hyaluronic acid [
12]. Samson et al. (2015) used ocular tissues from human cadavers as a counterbody and sliding speeds between 0.3 and 30 mm/s to evaluate the friction properties of commercially available CL. CLs based on senofilcon A and narafilcon A were mentioned as having higher 𝜇 values than those on delefilcon A [
13]. Furthermore, they also studied the ability of proteoglycan 4 (PRG4) to lubricate and adhere to CLs, and demonstrated that PRG4 significantly reduces friction against corneal and eyelid tissues. As PRG4 in solution was able to effectively lubricate CL based on senofilcon A and narafilcon A, they suggested that this protein, used as a lubricant or in the constitution of CL, may have the clinical capacity to reduce friction and improve comfort in alive [
13]. With the aim of investigating and associating the deposition of lysozyme, the most abundant tear protein, and friction between the contact lens and the eye with discomfort and ocular changes, Su et al. (2018) developed a preservative-free CL care solution to investigate whether it could effectively remove lysozyme and provide lubrication. Two CL materials were studied, etafilcon A and polymacon, using a rotational tribometer based on the measurement of friction force. A polyethylene (PE) support was used for the CL, a quartz glass as a counterbody, normal loads of 60 mN, rotation speeds of 1 rpm and rotation times of 900 s [
14]. The results suggested that the deposition of lysozyme on the surface of the material increases the friction between the contact lens and the glass, and when adding the lubricating solution, the friction coefficient decreases significantly for non-ionic CL. In other words, they showed that the preservative-free solution can effectively reduce the friction caused by lysozyme for non-ionic CL under certain test conditions. However, the effect of the solution on CL behaviour will be different when all tear components are present [
14].
The main objective of this work is to study the influence of BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin) protein content on the friction of soft contact lenses. For this purpose, a new methodology was used, which consists of using a tribometer with the operating principle of a pendulum with horizontal movement and the study of friction is based on the evaluation of the dissipated energy along free vibration response of the system after the application of a mechanical impulse.