MB 0026 Set1
MB 0026 Set1
______________________________________________________________
The same idea has been expressed by Spencer and Seigelman in the following
words. “Managerial Economics is the integration of economic theory with business practice for
the purpose of facilitating decision making and forward planning by the management”.
According to Mc Nair and Meriam, “Managerial economics is the use of economic modes of
thought to analyze business situation”.
Brighman and Pappas define managerial economics as,” the application of economic
theory and methodology to business administration practice”. Joel dean is of the opinion
that use of economic analysis in formulating business and management policies
is known as managerial economics.
The major functions of Managerial Economics are Decision making and forward
planning.
1. Decision making
‘Decision’ suggests a deliberate choice made out of several possible alternative
courses of action after carefully considering them. The act of choice signifying
solution to an economic problem is economic decision making. It involves
choices among a set of alternative courses of action.
Decision making is essentially a process of selecting the best out of many
alternative opportunities or courses of action that are open to a management.
2. Forward planning
The term ‘planning’ implies a consciously directed activity with certain
predetermined goals and means to carry them out. It is a deliberate activity. It
is a programmed action. Basically planning is concerned with tackling future
situations in a systematic manner.
Forward planning implies planning in advance for the future. It is associated with
deciding the future course of action of a firm. It is prepared on the basis of past
and current experience of a firm. It is prepared in the background of uncertain
and unpredictable environment and guess work.
Elasticity of Demand
2. Perfectly Inelastic Demand: In this case, what ever may be the change in
price, quantity demanded will remain perfectly constant. The demand curve is a
vertical straight line and parallel to OY axis. Quantity demanded would be 10
units, irrespective of price changes from Rs. 10.00 to Rs. 2.00. Hence, the
numerical coefficient of perfectly inelastic demand is zero. ED = 0
Out of five different degrees, the first two are theoretical and the last one is a
rare possibility. Hence, in all our general discussion, we make reference only to
two terms relatively elastic demand and relatively inelastic demand.
As per Professor Joel Dean, few guidelines to make forecasting of demand for
new products are:
a. Evolutionary approach
The demand for the new product may be considered as an outgrowth of an
existing product. For e.g.,
Demand for new Tata Indica, which is a modified version of Old Indica can most
effectively be projected based on the sales of the old Indica, the demand for new
Pulsor can be forecasted based on the sales of the old Pulsor. Thus when a new
product is evolved from the old product, the demand conditions of the old
product can be taken as a basis for forecasting the demand for the new product.
b. Substitute approach
If the new product developed serves as substitute for the existing product, the
demand for the new product may be worked out on the basis of a ‘market
share’. The growths of demand for all the products have to be worked out on the
basis of intelligent forecasts for independent variables that influence the demand
for the substitutes. After that, a portion of the market can be sliced out for the
new product. For e.g., A moped as a substitute for a scooter, a cell phone as a
substitute for a land line. In some cases price plays an important role in shaping
future demand for the product.
f. Vicarious approach
A firm will survey consumers’ reactions to a new product indirectly through
getting in touch with some specialized and informed dealers who have good
knowledge about the market, about the different varieties of the product already
available in the market, the consumers’ preferences etc. This helps in making a
more efficient estimation of future demand.
Before Marshall, there was a dispute among economists on whether the force of
demand or the force of supply is more important in determining price. Marshall
gave equal importance to both the demand and supply in the determination of
value or price. He compared supply and demand to a pair of scissors which
explained that neither supply alone, nor demand alone can determine the price
of a commodity, both are equally important in the determination of price. But
the relative importance of the two may vary depending upon the time under
consideration. Thus, the demand of all consumers and the supply of all firms
together determine the price of a commodity in the market.
If the increase in demand is greater than the increase in supply, the new market
equilibrium is at a higher level showing a rise in both the equilibrium price and
the equilibrium quantity demanded and supplied. On the other hand if the
increase in supply is greater than the increase in demand, the new market
equilibrium is at lower level, showing a lower equilibrium price and a higher
quantity of good supplied and demanded.
Similar will be the effects when the decrease in demand is greater than the
decrease in supply on the market equilibrium.
Implicit or imputed costs are implied costs. They do not take the form of cash
outlays and as such do not appear in the books of accounts. They are the
earnings of owner employed resources. For example, the factor inputs owned by
the entrepreneur himself like capital can be utilized by him or can be supplied to
others for a contractual sum if he himself does not utilize them in the business.
It is to be remembered that the total cost is a sum of both implicit and explicit
costs.
Prof, Boumal has developed two models. The first is static model and the second
one is the dynamic model.
Assumptions
1. Higher advertisement expenditure would certainly increase sales revenue
of a firm.
2. Market price remains constant.
3. Demand and cost curves of the firm are conventional in nature.