Evaluation of Meropenem, Imipenem and Ertapenem Impregnated MacConkey Agar Plates For The Detection of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Evaluation of Meropenem, Imipenem and Ertapenem Impregnated MacConkey Agar Plates For The Detection of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Evaluation of Meropenem, Imipenem and Ertapenem Impregnated MacConkey Agar Plates For The Detection of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Evaluation of Meropenem, Imipenem and Ertapenem Impregnated MacConkey Agar Plates for the Detection of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Rula Al-Dawodi1,3, Rawan Liddawi1,3, Raed Ghneim1,3, Randa Kattan1,3, Issa Siryani1,3, Afaf Abu-Diab1, Riyad Ghneim1, Madeleine Zoughbi1,3, Abed-El-Razeq Issa1,3, Randa Al Qass1,3, Sultan Turkuman1, Hiyam Marzouqa1, and Musa Hindiyeh1,2,3*
1 Caritas Baby Hospital, Bethlehem, Palestine; 2 Bethlehem University, Bethlehem, Palestine; 3 Palestinian Forum for Medical Research (PFMR), Ramallah, Palestine * Correspondence:
[email protected]
* Musa Y Hindiyeh, Caritas Baby Hospital Bethlehem Palestine.
Abstract
Background: Rapid detection of carbapenem resistant bacteria, in particular,
members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (CRE), is of utmost importance for the management of infected or colonized patients.
Results: Of the three carbapenems impregnated plates, Mac-Ert plates gave the
lowest LOD; however, its specicity was poor as it failed to inhibit the growth of some of the ESBL producing strains. The Mac-Imp plate LOD and specicity were both unsatisfactory for several strains of the bacterial isolates tested. On the other hand the 0.5 mg/ml Mac-Mem plates showed low LOD for the blaKPC producing bacteria and had excellent specicity as it prevented the growth of all the ESBL and blaAmpC positive isolates tested. Not only that, but the shelf-life of the 0.5mg/ ml Mac-Mem plate was long, up to one month at 4oC.
Conclusions: The high specicity and the good selectivity, in addition to the long
shelf-life allowed the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem agar to be used as a cost effective selective medium for the isolation of carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria, in particular the blaKPC producing members of the Enterobacteriaceae family.
iMedPub Journals
Introduction
Rapid detection of carbapenem resistant bacteria, in particular, members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (CRE) is of utmost importance for the management of infected or colonized patients (1). Carbapenems are widely used to treat severe bacterial infections that are often hard to manage. Several carbapenem resistance mechanisms have been implicated in how bacterial strains become resistant to carbapenems. Based on the molecular properties of the lactamases, four classes of carbapenemases have been identied (2). These include the molecular classes (A, C, and D) -lactamases with the amino acid serine at their active site, and the molecular class B where the -lactamases are all metalloenzymes with an active-site zinc (2). Class A enzymes, an Ambler molecular class enzymes (ex: blaKPC), have been the most common detected carbapenemases with worldwide distribution (1). For any health care facility, it is important to understand the level of CRE spreading in its different medical departments. It has been recommended by the American Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), that in areas which are not endemic for CRE, the acute care facilities should review all the microbiology records for the preceding 6-12 months to determine if CREs have been isolated at the institution (3). Upon the identication of CRE cases, surveillance cultures from high risk areas should be performed to identify any unrecognized cases. CREs active surveillance cultures (perianal/rectal swabs), taken from patients upon admission are of great importance for the identication of unrecognized CRE-colonized patients, in order to take immediate and appropriate isolation precautions (4, 5). Studies have shown that in areas where CREs are endemic, up to 5.4% of hospitalized patients can be carriers of CREs, of which only one-third had a positive clinical culture (4). Moreover, surveillance swabs have been reported to considerably lower the cost of patient hospitalization (6). Active surveillance cultures taken from patients coming from highly CRE endemic medical settings upon admission have been used as part of a comprehensive strategy to combat the spread of CREs. Studies have shown a 4.7-fold reduction in the incidence of CRE infection following the activation of the active CRE surveillance program (7, 8). Several highly sensitive Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assays and Real-Time PCR assays have been developed and validated for the rapid detection and identication of blaKPC positive bacteria (9-12). However, one of the disadvantages of these assays was the need for specialized equipment and well trained personnel. Consequently, screening agar plates, that have incorporated one of the commonly used carbapenems (ertapenem, meropenem or imipenem), have been developed
and utilized for the rapid detection of blaKPC producing bacteria. Chromogenic agar, CHROMagarTM KPC (CHROMagar, France), has been evaluated for the detection of blaKPC positive bacteria. However, this agar base medium still missed certain strains of blaKPC positive Enterobacteriaceae (1, 13, 14). Similar performance between the CHROMagarTM KPC and MacConkey Agar impregnated with 2 g/ml imipenem was noted by Adler et al. (15). More recently, the Drigalski agar-based culture medium was reported to have excellent sensitivity and specicity for the detection of bacteria carrying the blaKPC resistance mechanism (14). In this study, we report the evaluation of cost effective MacConkey Agar plates impregnated with one of the carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem and ertapenem) for the detection of CREs. In addition, the specicity, analytical sensitivity and the plates shelf-life were also evaluated. The concentrations of the antibiotics evaluated were 1.0 g/mL and 0.5 g/mL. These concentrations were chosen after careful evaluation of the carbapenems lowest minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) interpretation guidelines published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (17).
Bacterial Strains
Carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae members (N=9), Extended Spectrum b Lactamases (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae strains (N= 6), blaAmpC -lactamase (N=1) and multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (N=1), all isolated from patients samples at Caritas Baby Hospital (CBH) laboratory, were used to evaluate the performance of the carbapenems impregnated MacConkey Agar. The carbapenem resistant isolates included: 3 Klebsiella pneumoniae blaKPC positive; 2 Enterobacter species blaKPC positive; 2 E. coli blaKPC positive; 1 Citrobacter species blaKPC positive and 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae blaOXA-48 positive. The ESBL positive isolates were (K. pneumoniae, Salmonella species, Shigella sonnei, E. coli , Proteus species and Citrobacter species); while the blaAmpC positive bacteria was an Enterobacter species. Moreover, 14 Klebsiella pneumoniae blaOXA-48 positive and 2 E. coli blaOXA-48 positive were used to evaluate the analyti Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
iMedPub Journals
cal sensitivity of the 0.5 g/ml Mac-Mem agar plates for the detection of low level carbapenemase producing blaOXA-48 Enterobacteriaceae. All bacterial strains were identied according to the Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, and their antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed in duplicate according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines (CLSI) (16, 17). In addition, the Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) of meropenem, imipenem and ertapenem for all tested members of the Enterobacteriaceae family were determined using the Etest (bioMrieux, France) on Mueller-Hinton plates (Oxoid, UK). The presence of the carbapenemase enzyme in the members of the Enterobacteriaceae family was conrmed by the modied Hodge Test (17), and in duplicate by the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplication of either the blaKPC or the blaOXA-48 genes (18, 19).
Determination of the specicity and Shelf-Life of the different Carbapenems Impregnated Plates
MacConkey agar plates (Mac-Mem, Mac-Imp, and Mac-Ert) impregnated with the two different concentrations (0.5 g/ ml and 1.0 g/ml) of the three carbapenems, were prepared and stored at 4-8oC. The plates were inoculated with colonies from six members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (K. pneumoniae, Salmonella species, Shigella species, E. coli, Proteus species, and Citrobacter species), all with the ESBL phenotype and one Enterobacter species with the blaAmpC phenotype. The plates specicity was determined after monitoring the growth of the ESBL and blaAmpC positive bacteria on freshly prepared plates; while the plates shelf-life was determined by monitoring bacterial growth on the different plates after 7, 14, 21 and 30 days of plates storage at 4-8oC. The plates were inoculated and incubated in ambient air at 35oC for 18-24 hours. Following incubation, the plates were evaluated for the growth of any bacterial colonies.
Detection of CREs on 0.5 g/ml Mac-Mem agar from clinical patient samples
0.5g/ml Mac-Mem agar plates were incorporated from January 2012 till April 2013 into CBH active surveillance system for the detection of drug resistant bacteria (19). During the study period, 2,784 swabs were collected from three body sites (nose/throat, umbilical/axillary, and rectal) of patients referred to CBH for admission from other medical institutions. All three swabs were inoculated on MacConkey agar with 10g/ml Cefotaxime (Mac-CTX), 5% Sheep Blood Agar with 6g/ml vancomycin, 5% Sheep Blood Agar (Hy-Lab Rehovot) and 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem. Inoculated plates were incubated in ambient air at 35oC for 18-24 hours. Any bacterial growth on any of the selective media was worked up according to the Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook and their antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines (CLSI) (16, 17).
iMedPub Journals
Results
Analytical sensitivity of the 0.5 g/ml and 1.0 g/ ml Mac-Mem, Mac-Imp and Mac-Ert Agar plates
The lowest number of bacterial colony forming units (LOD) for each of the three plates Mac-Mem, Mac-Imp and MacErt was determined for the two antibiotic concentrations in duplicate and the LOD testing was repeated three times with similar results. Moreover, the MICs of carbapenem resistant bacteria to the three carbapenems, were also determined ( Table 1). Of the three carbapenems evaluated, Mac-Ert plates gave the lowest number of CFUs detected regard-
less of the concentration of the antibiotic used (0.5 g/ml or 1.0g/ml). With the exception to the K. pneumoniae with the blaOXA-48 carbapenem resistance mechanism which failed to grow on both Mac-Ert concentrations. The Mac-Ert plate lowest LOD for all of the carbapenem resistant bacterial strains tested was <15 CFUs, regardless of their carbapenem MICs ( Table 1). There was a statistical signicance ( p-value <0.05) between the LOD of the Mac-Ert, for the majority of the organisms tested, when compared to the Mac-Mem and the Mac-Imp ( Table 1). On the other hand, the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem plates detected all 10 strains of carbapenem resistant bacteria, however at a
Table 1. Limit of Detection of the three carbapenem impregnated MacConkey Agar plates.
Bacterial Isolates MICs (E-Test) mg/L* Meropenem Ertapenem Imipenem Limit of Detection (CFU) of Limit of Detection (CFU) of 1.0g/ml Plates** 0.5 g/ml Plates** Meropenem Meropenem Ertapenem Ertapenem 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 NG 1 Imipenem Imipenem 1 NG NG NG NG NG NG NG 1
Bacterial Strain
Klesiella pneumoniae ( blaKPC ) 57449 E. coli ( blaKPC) 41807 Citrobacter species ( blaKPC ) 46685 Enterobacter species( blaKPC ) 40426 Klebsiella pneumoniae ( blaKPC) 40926 Klebsiella pneumoniae ( blaKPC ) 59313 Enterobacter species( blaKPC) 42783 E. coli ( blaKPC) 47961 Klebsiella pneumoniae ( blaOXA- 48 ) Acinetobacter baumannii MDR
32 8 32 32 32 32 32 32 0.75 32
32 32 24 32 32 32 32 16 2 32
32 4 24 32 32 32 32 12 32 32
9 1# 1# 1# 1# 1# 1 2# NG 1
NG = No Growth; *MIC = Minimal Inhibitory Concentration; ** Limit of Detection is the lowest number of colony forming units that was detected on the different plates. #Statistically signicant difference, p Value (<0.05), between LOD of Mac-Ert and both the Mac-Mem and Mac-Imp. ~Statistically signicant difference, p Value (<0.05), between LOD of Mac-Mem and Mac-Imp.
iMedPub Journals
Table 2. Growth of bacterial strains with the ESBL phenotype and Enterobacter species with blaAmpC phenotype on the different freshly prepared agar plates.
Growth on Mac-Mem 0.5g/ml / 1.0g/ml NG / NG NG / NG NG / NG NG / NG NG / NG NG / NG NG / NG Growth on Mac-Imp 0.5g/ml / 1.0g/ml NG / NG NG / NG NG / NG NG / NG G/G G/G G/G Growth on Mac-Ert 0.5g/ml / 1.0g/ml NG / NG NG / NG NG / NG NG / NG G / NG G/G G/G
Bacterial Strain K. pneumoniae Salmonella species Shigella species E. coli Proteus species Citrobacter species Enterobacter species NG = No growth ; G = Growth
higher LOD. The 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem plates detected 8 out of the 10 strains at a limit of detection of 1.6 x 103 CFUs, while the lowest LOD for the Citrobacter species blaKPC and the K. pneumoniae blaOXA-48 were 2.5 x 105 and 1.1 x 106 CFUs, respectively. Higher LOD was noted for the 1.0g/ ml Mac-Mem agar in addition to its failure to detect the K. pneumoniae blaOXA-48 ( Table 1). The worst performance was noted for the imipenem plate regardless of the antibiotic concentration used as a number of blaKPC producing bacterial strains in addition to the Klebsiella pneumoniae blaOXA- 48 positive strain failed to grow on the 0.5g/ml and the 1.0g/ ml plates ( Table 1). There was a statistical signicance ( pvalue <0.05) between the LOD of the Mac-Mem, for the majority of the organisms tested, when compared to the Mac-Imp ( Table 1). All three plates tested at both antibiotic concentrations had low limit of detection (1 CFU) for the multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.
tibiotic concentrations consistently failed to inhibit the growth of the Proteus, Enterobacter and Citrobacter species evaluated ( Table 2).
Shelf-life of the 0.5g/ml and 1.0g/ml Mac-Mem, Mac-Imp and Mac-Ert Agar plates
Six members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (K. pneumoniae, Salmonella species, Shigella species, E. coli, Proteus species and Citrobacter species) all with the ESBL phenotype, in addition to one Enterobacter species with the blaAmpC phenotype were utilized to evaluate the shelf-life of the different plates in triplicate after 7, 14, 21 and 30 days. None of the bacterial isolates grew on the 0.5g/ml or the 1.0g/ml Mac-Mem plates after plates storage for 30 days at 4-8oC. On the other hand, bacterial growth was noted on the stored Mac-Imp and Mac-Ert plates after one day of the plates preparation, and after 7, 14, 21 and 31days of plates storage for some of the isolates.
Evaluation of the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem agar plates for the detection of low level carbapenemase producing blaOXA-48 Enterobacteriaceae
The analytical sensitivity of the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem agar plates was determined on 16 blaOXA-48 positive Enterobacteriaceae (14 K. pneumoniae and 2 E. coli ) in duplicate (Table 3). The 16 blaOXA-48 positive Enterobacteriaceae MICs (mg/L) of the three carbapenems widely varied ( Table 3). For meropenem, the MICs were between 0.25 and 16, for imipenem between 0.5 and 8, while for ertapenem between 0.75 and >32. Consistent with the low meropenem MICs, the limit of detection of the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem agar varied between 3.0E+05 (CFU/ml) and 6.60E+06. One of the isolates growth was completely inhibited (Table 3).
iMedPub Journals
Table 3. Limit of detection of blaOXA-48 producing Enterobacteriaceae on the 0.5 g/ml meropenem plates and the MICs to the 3 carbapenems
blaOXA-48 Positive Bacteria K. pneumoniae 1560 K. pneumoniae 1937 K. pneumoniae 2301 K. pneumoniae 2307 K. pneumoniae 2663 K. pneumoniae 2806 K. pneumoniae 2213 K. pneumoniae 2214 K. pneumoniae 2215 K. pneumoniae 2216 K. pneumoniae 2217 K. pneumoniae 3856 K. pneumoniae 4451 K. pneumoniae 4529 E. coli 3856F E. coli 3856NF ND = Not Detected Carbapenem MIC mg/L determined by E-Test Meropenem 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 4 16 0.38 0.75 0.38 0.75 0.38 0.25 0.38 0.38 0.5 Imipenem 1.5 1 0.75 1 1 1 8 2 0.75 0.75 2 0.75 0.5 4 0.75 0.75 Ertapenem 1.5 1 >32 2 3 >32 >32 4 2 12 >32 1 8 2 2 0.75 Limit of Detection(CFU) of 0.5mg/mL Mac-Mem 6.60E+05 3.00E+05 1.68E+06 2.04E+06 ND 7.8E+05 3.0E+05 1.14E+06 1.44E+06 4.68E+05 3.00E+05 3.00E+05 6.60E+06 3.12E+06 1.38E+06 6.60E+05
Detection of CRE in clinical patient samples inoculated on 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem agar plates
The 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem Agar plate was included in panel of plates used in the active bacterial drug resistance surveillance program at CBH (19). From the 2,784 inoculated swabs, 59 carbapenem resistant strains of bacteria were isolated on the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem plates and on the Mac-CTX. These include K. pneumoniae blaKPC (N=12), Enterobacter cloacae blaKPC (N = 2), Enterobacter cloacae blaVIM (N=1), Klebsiella pneumoniae blaOXA-48 (N=16), E. coli blaOXA-48 (N=3), multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (N=10), multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (N = 10), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (N=5). Thus, the clinical sensitivity, specicity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values for the Mac-Mem when compared to the Mac-CTX were 100%. It was of importance to note that other types of Gram-negative bacteria grew on the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem plate. These include Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains that were not resistant to meropenem but had a meropenem MIC greater than 0.5g/ml. In addition, bacterial strains (N=20) from the Enterobacteriaceae family carrying the blaAmpC -lactamase grew on the primary streak zone of the 0.5g/ml merope-
nem. These isolates that hyper produce blaAmpC -lactamase were not included in the study but their isolation was of importance from an infection control point of view.
Discussion
Rapid, sensitive and cost effective ways are of utmost importance for the early detection of CREs in patient samples. In this study we evaluated the performance of MacConkey agar plates impregnated with different concentrations (0.5g/ml or 1.0g/ml) of one of the three commonly used carbapenems; meropenem, imipenem and ertapenem. In addition, the plates specicity to detect carbapenem resistant bacteria, their shelf-life at 4-8oC and their cost effectiveness were determined. The Mac-Ert with either of the two antibiotics concentrations showed the best LOD of the blaKPC positive Enterobacteriaceae. On both plate concentrations the lowest LOD was between 1 and 13 CFUs ( Table 1). Surprisingly, both Mac-Ert plates did not support the growth of the blaOXA-48 producing K. pneumoniae strain used in the evaluation ( Table 1). The overall performance of the Mac-Ert plates was similar to that reported by Nordman et al., who reported an LOD Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
iMedPub Journals
of <500 CFU/mL for some of the Enterobacteriaceae members that were cultured on the Supercarba medium (Drigalski agar-base culture medium containing 0.25g/ml ertapenem, 250g/ml cloxacillin and 70g/ml ZnSO4) (14). However, the Supercarba medium supported the growth of the blaOXA-48 positive strains (14). Unlike its excellent LOD, the specicity and the shelf-life of the Mac-Ert plates were poor as Citrobacter species with the ESBL phenotype and Enterobacter species with the blaAmpC phenotype grew on the plates ( Table 2). Consistent with what was noted on the Mac-Ert plates, some bacterial strains carrying the blaAmpC phenotype grew on the Supercarba medium (14). Similar to the low LOD of Mac-Ert to the blaKPC positive Enterobacteriaceae, it was also shown by Lolans et al., that the utilization of two 10g/ml ertapenem disks on MacConkey agar can facilitate the detection of blaKPC positive bacteria (20). Interestingly, in that study the authors did not evaluate the growth of different ESBL and blaAmpC positive Enterobacteriaceae around the ertapenem disks. Unlike the Mac-Ert plates, both concentrations of the Mac-Imp plates (0.5g/ml or 1.0g/ml) gave poor sensitivity, specicity and shelf-life. Both concentrations of the Mac-Imp plates failed to inhibit the growth of Proteus species and Citrobacter species with the ESBL phenotype, and Enterobacter species with the blaAmpC phenotype ( Table 2). In addition to the poor specicity, the plates shelf-life was extremely short as the Mac-Imp plates failed to inhibit the growth of two of the ESBL positive isolates and the blaAmpC positive isolate tested. The LOD of the Mac-Imp plates evaluated in this study was similar to that reported by Adler et al. who showed that the MacConkey agar impregnated with 2g/ml imipenem had a limit of detection between 1.1E+02 and 8.3E+06 (15); however, the authors did not evaluate the shelf-life of the plate. The 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem plates gave suitable LOD for the blaKPC positive Enterobacteriaceae when compared to the 1.0g/ml Mac-Mem agar plates as the lowest LOD was less than 2.0E +03 for the majority of the blaKPC positive bacteria ( Table 1). One Citrobacter species gave an LOD of 2.5E+05 CFU/ml in the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem plate. The LOD of the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem plates for the detection of blaKPC positive Enterobacteriaceae was similar to that reported by Nordman et al. who reported an LOD of <500 CFU/ml for some of the Enterobacteriaceae members (14). However, in the study conducted by Nordman et al. the authors did not evaluate blaKPC positive Citrobacter species (14). Consistent with the excellent sensitivity, the specicity of the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem plates was excellent as the plates prevented the growth of both ESBL and blaAmpC positive tested members of the Enterobacteriaceae family ( Table 2). The specicity of the 0.5 and 1.0g/ml Mac-Mem plates was the best when compared to the Mac-Ert and the Mac-Imp plates. Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
The 0.5 g/ml Mac-Mem agar long shelf-life (30 days) was of considerable importance since the laboratory technologist can prepare the medium and stores it at 4-8oC for up to four weeks. With the current work load and the number of employees available in the clinical microbiology laboratory, such long shelf-life is of importance. The four week shelf-life is much longer than the one week shelf-life of the Supercarba medium (14). The preparation of the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem plates in the clinical laboratory was cost effective. In Palestine, the direct cost of preparing the plate was 0.33 USD. The cost is cheaper than the CHROMagarTM KPC and the 1.0g/ml imipenem MacConkey Agar which cost $2.1 and $0.7, respectively (15). Estimated cost analysis of the Supercarba medium is above the cost of the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem agar plates. The 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem agar plate excellent analytical sensitivity, specicity, low cost and long shelf-life prompted the utilization of this screening plate on 2,748 patient swab samples for the presence of carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem agar plate inhibited the growth of non-carbapenem resistant bacteria and allowed for the isolation of 59 different bacterial strains with different carbapenem resistant mechanisms. The isolation of these pathogens was at least 24-48 hours faster than isolating them on MacConkey agar impregnated with the third generation cephalosporin Cefotaxime (Mac-CTX). This was of utmost importance since it allowed the microbiology laboratory personnel to report the isolation of these pathogens to the infection control team who took the necessary precautions to prevent the spread of these pathogens in the hospital setting. However, one of the drawbacks that were noted after utilizing the 0.5 g/ml Mac-Mem was the growth of bacterial strains with the blaAmpC phenotype on the primary streak zone of the plate. The growth of bacterial strains carrying the blaAmpC phenotype was also reported on the Supercarba medium but to a much lower extent. However, the authors added 250g/ ml cloxacillin to reduce the chance that these bacterial strains that hyper produce the blaAmpC will grow (14). In our study we opted not to add the cloxacillin since the detection of bacterial isolates with the blaAmpC phenotype did not occur frequently. The other drawback of utilizing the meropenem instead of ertapenem was the high LOD of the blaOXA-48 positive bacteria. Overall, the LOD of the blaOXA-48 positive bacteria was around 1.4E+06. This was higher than the LOD reported by Nordmann et al. who showed that depending on the blaOXA-48 positive bacteria, the LOD can be as low as 1 CFU/mL to 5.0E+02 CFU/mL (14). The higher LOD of blaOXA-48 positive bacteria on the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem plate did not compromise the bacterial detection as 16 isolates were detected on both the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem and the 10 g/mL Mac-CTX plates.
iMedPub Journals
Overall, the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem agar plate can be used as a cost effective selective medium for the isolation of carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacteria in particular the ones induced by the blaKPC carbapenem resistance mechanism. Not only that, but the 0.5g/ml Mac-Mem agar allows for the detection of other carbapenem resistant mechanisms such as blaVIM and blaOXA-48. In areas where carbapenem resistance mechanism is endemic this plate can be used to rapidly assist the infection control practitioners in controlling the spread of these pathogens.
References
1. Nordmann P, Cuzon G, Naas T. The real threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(4):228-36. 2. Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile betalactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(3):440-58, table of contents. 3. CDC. Guidance for control of infections with carbapenem-resistant or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in acute care facilities. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58(10):256-60. 4. Wiener-Well Y, Rudensky B, Yinnon AM, Kopuit P, Schlesinger Y, Broide E, et al. Carriage rate of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in hospitalised patients during a national outbreak. J Hosp Infect. 2010;74(4):344-9. 5. Buehlmann M, Fankhauser H, Laffer R, Bregenzer T, Widmer AF. The inguinal skin: an important site of colonization with extendedspectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(4):427-8. 6. Calfee D, Jenkins SG. Use of active surveillance cultures to detect asymptomatic colonization with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in intensive care unit patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(10):966-8. 7. Ben-David D, Maor Y, Keller N, Regev-Yochay G, Tal I, Shachar D, et al. Potential role of active surveillance in the control of a hospital-wide outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(6):620-6. 8. Munoz-Price LS, De La Cuesta C, Adams S, Wyckoff M, Cleary T, McCurdy SP, et al. Successful eradication of a monoclonal strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae during a K. pneumoniae carbapenemaseproducing K. pneumoniae outbreak in a surgical intensive care unit in Miami, Florida. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(10):1074-7.
9. CDC. Multiplex Real-Time PCR Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) and New Delhi metallo- -lactamase (NDM1). CDC 2011 [cited; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/pdfs/ labSettings/KPC-NDM-protocol-2011.pdf] 10. Hindiyeh M, Smollen G, Grossman Z, Ram D, Davidson Y, Mileguir F, et al. Rapid detection of blaKPC carbapenemase genes by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(9):2879-83. 11. Hindiyeh M, Smollan G, Grossman Z, Ram D, Robinov J, Belausov N, et al. Rapid detection of blaKPC carbapenemase genes by internally controlled real-time PCR assay using bactec blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(7):2480-4. 12. Schechner V, Straus-Robinson K, Schwartz D, Pfeffer I, Tarabeia J, Moskovich R, et al. Evaluation of PCR-based testing for surveillance of KPC-producing carbapenem-resistant members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(10):3261-5. 13. Moran Gilad J, Carmeli Y, Schwartz D, Navon-Venezia S. Laboratory evaluation of the CHROMagar KPC medium for identication of carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;70(4):565-7. 14. Nordmann P, Girlich D, Poirel L. Detection of carbapenemase producers in Enterobacteriaceae using a novel screening medium. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 ; 50(8): 2761- 6. 15. Adler A, Navon-Venezia S, Moran-Gilad J, Marcos E, Schwartz D, Carmeli Y. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of screening agar plates for detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from surveillance rectal swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(6):2239-42. 16. Isenberg HD. Clinical microbiology procedures handbook. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2004. 17. CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute sixteenth informational supplement. . Wayne, PA; 2013. 18. Poirel L, Pitout JD, Nordmann P. Carbapenemases: molecular diversity and clinical consequences. Future Microbiol. 2007;2(5):501-12. 19. Kattan R, Liddawi R, Ghneim R, Siryani I, Al-Dawodi R, Abu-Diab A, et al. Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (blaKPC-2) in members of the Enterobacteriaceae family in Palestine. The International Arabic Journal Of Antimicrobial Agents. 2012; 2(2:4). 20. Lolans K, Calvert K, Won S, Clark J, Hayden MK. Direct ertapenem disk screening method for identication of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in surveillance swab specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 ;48(3):836-41. 21. Percin D, Colakoglu S, Durmaz S, Ekincioglu P. [Comparison of ertapenem-EMB Agar with traditional methods for screening carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from rectal swabs]. Mikrobiyoloji bulteni. 2012;46(4):546-52. 22. Leavitt A, Chmelnitsky I, Colodner R, Ofek I, Carmeli Y, Navon-Venezia S. Ertapenem resistance among extended-spectrum-beta-lactamaseproducing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 ;47(4):969-74.
Follow us:
Medicalia.org
Where Doctors exchange clinical experiences, review their cases and share clinical knowledge. You can also access lots of medical publications for free. Join Now! http://medicalia.ning.com/
http://www.iajaa.org