Scribd
Upload
3K views

Reliability Study Sil Evaluation: Calculation Note

This document evaluates the reliability of a final element of a Safety Instrumented System (SIS) consisting of a ball valve, actuation system, and control panel. Failure rates for each component are obtained from reference documents. A SIL evaluation is performed and calculations show the system meets SIL 2 requirements with a PFDAvg of 6.64E-03 and SFF of 84.04%, allowing the final element to be classified as SIL 2.

Uploaded by

kenoly123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3K views

Reliability Study Sil Evaluation: Calculation Note

This document evaluates the reliability of a final element of a Safety Instrumented System (SIS) consisting of a ball valve, actuation system, and control panel. Failure rates for each component are obtained from reference documents. A SIL evaluation is performed and calculations show the system meets SIL 2 requirements with a PFDAvg of 6.64E-03 and SFF of 84.04%, allowing the final element to be classified as SIL 2.

Uploaded by

kenoly123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

CALCULATIONNOTE

N:NCSIL1314094A
Rev:0
Page:1/5

RELIABILITYSTUDY

SILEVALUATION

Applicationfield:

FinalelementsofSafetyInstrumentedSystem(SIS)asdefinedinAF13/14094(SRireference)

Summary:

CalculationnoteforaSILevaluation.

ThisdocumentbelongstoSRiandcannotbereproducedwithoutauthorization.

DIFFUSION:

Engineeringdepartment
Customer

\\Bureau_etudes\aqbe\Notesdecalculfiabilit\Affaire\AF1314094\NCSIL1314094A.doc

0
Rev

24/01/2014
Date

L.MAURIANGE
Writtenby

C.RANQUET
Checkedby

C.RANQUET
Approvedby

CALCULATIONNOTE

N:NCSIL1314094A
Rev:0
Page:2/5

Rev

Date

0 24/01/2014 Originalversion

Object

Pages
All

CALCULATIONNOTE

N:NCSIL1314094A
Rev:0
Page:3/5

SOMMAIRE
1

OBJECT ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 4

RELATEDDOCUMENTS ............................................................................................................................................................ 4

SISCOMPOSITIONANDRELIABILITYDATA ............................................................................................................................ 4
3.1 BALLVALVE(FINALELEMENT) ..................................................................................................................................................... 4
3.2 ACTUATIONSYSTEMCOMPONENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 4

SILEVALUATION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4
4.1 THEORY .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4
4.2 APPLICATION ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5

CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5

CALCULATIONNOTE

N:NCSIL1314094A
Rev:0
Page:4/5

OBJECT
ThisdocumentevaluatesthereliabilityofafinalelementofaSafetyInstrumentedSystem(SIS).

RELATEDDOCUMENTS
1) IEC61508/61511
2) FSP1200101CertificateforSRiEngineeringA90RLBallValve
3) BET090460C001EXIDASILCertificateBETTISCBSeriesactuators
4) VER090434C003EXIDASILCertificateVERSASolenoidvalves
5) VER1105071C001,EXIDASILCertificateVERSAQuickExhaustValves
6) 5034544001C,ControlpaneltypeP1A

SISCOMPOSITIONANDRELIABILITYDATA
3.1
Ballvalve(finalelement)
Thevalve'sfailureratesaredefinedinRef[2].

NormalyopenvalveclosesinresponsetoactuationwithPVST:

DU,Valve =1.90E7Fail/h
DD,Valve =5.09E7Fail/h
SU,Valve=1.91E6Fail/h
SD,Valve=0

3.2
Actuationsystemcomponents
ThevalveisequippedofaBETTIStypeCBBactuatorwithcontrolpanelRef[6].Thepartsinvolvedinthe
movinginsecuritypositionare1VERSACSG33213/2solenoidvalve,1VERSACSP33013/2pilotvalve
and1VERSAQuickExhaustValveEQ3316.ThedatausedforthecalculationaredefinedinRef[3]and
Ref[5].

SILEVALUATION
4.1
Theory
InordertoestimatetheSILofaSIS,twoparametersneedtobecalculated:theAverageProbabilityof
FailureonDemand(PFDavg)andtheSafeFailureFraction(SFF).
Ti=TestInterval=1year

N:NCSIL1314094A
Rev:0
Page:5/5

CALCULATIONNOTE

PFD
Global 1 1 PFD u

PFD u DU,u Ti for all the components

PFD Avg PFD Global

2
i,DU

SFF 1 i
i,Tot
i

100

4.2

Application

DU
DD
D
SU
SD
S
Tot

SRiclosedin
securityvalve
withPVST

VERSA
Pilotvalve
CSP3301

VERSA
QuickExhaust
Solenoidvalve
Valve
QE3316
CSG3321
VERSA

BETTIS
Actuator
CBB
SRwithPVST

1.90E07

4.91E07

5.94E07

5.00E08

1.98E07

5.09E07

0.00E+00

0.00E+00

0.00E+00

2.28E07

6.99E07

4.91E07

5.94E07

5.00E08

4.26E07

1.91E06

1.67E06

2.35E06

2.27E07

7.58E07

0.00E+00

0.00E+00

0.00E+00

0.00E+00

3.73E07

1.91E06

1.67E06

2.35E06

2.27E07

1.13E06

2.61E06

2.16E06

2.94E06

2.77E07

1.56E06

DCpvst

72.82%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

53.5%

Ti

8760

8760

8760

8760

8760

SFF

92.7%

77.3%

79.8%

81.9%

87.3%

PFD

1.66E03

4.30E03

5.20E03

4.38E04

1.73E03

PFDGlobal

1.33E02

PFDAvg

6.64E03

SFF

84.04%

CONCLUSION
ThecriteriawhichmustberespectedinordertoreachSIL2are:
o PFDAvg<1E2
o SFF>60%.

Thecriteriaarerespected.Therefore,thedifferentcomponents,includingtheSRiballvalve,constitutea
finalelementofSISuptoSIL2.

You might also like