Effect of y Ash and Silica Fume On Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete Under Different Curing Conditions
Effect of y Ash and Silica Fume On Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete Under Different Curing Conditions
Effect of y Ash and Silica Fume On Compressive Strength of Self-Compacting Concrete Under Different Curing Conditions
CIVIL ENGINEERING
KEYWORDS
Self-compacting concrete;
Fly ash;
Silica fume;
Compressive strength;
Curing condition
Abstract This study presents an experimental study on self-compacting concrete (SCC) with two
cement content. The work involves three types of mixes, the rst consisted of different percentages
of y ash (FA), the second uses different percentages of silica fume (SF), and the third uses a
mixture of FA and SF. After each mix preparation, nine cylinder specimens are cast and cured.
Three specimens are cured in water for 28 days, three specimens are cured in water for 7 days,
and three specimens are left in air for 28 days. The slump and V-funnel test are carried out on
the fresh SCC and concrete compressive strength values are determined. The results show that
SCC with 15% of SF gives higher values of compressive strength than those with 30% of FA
and water cured specimens for 28 days give the highest values of compressive strength.
2011 Ain Shams University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is considered as a concrete
which can be placed and compacted under its self weight with
little or no vibration effort, and which is at the same time cohesive enough to be handled without segregation or bleeding of
* Tel.: +20 0160054760.
E-mail address: [email protected]
2090-4479 2011 Ain Shams University. Production and hosting by
Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Peer review under responsibility of Ain Shams University.
doi:10.1016/j.asej.2011.06.001
80
H.A. Mohamed
and 11% respectively. The results also indicated that SCC gave
high early concrete compressive strength. Ren and Wang [6],
studied the application of high y ash content concrete
(HFCC) with dipy construction formwork. Their test results
showed that, with the replacement of y ash increase the
strength of HFCC up to 50%.
The research carried out by Bentz et al. [7], indicated that
curing conditions have signicant effect on the degree of
hydration of cement. They showed that for specimens (initially
cured at 100% relative humidity (RH) for 6 or 12 h) exposed to
90% RH, hydration process discontinued as all remaining
capillary water was lost due to evaporation. Whilst curing under sealed condition, in particular for concretes with W/C ratio
of 0.4 or over, or keeping the surface as saturated were
adequate.
The tests carried out by Yazicioglu et al. [8] to investigate
the inuence of curing conditions on the mechanical properties
of self-compacting concrete, demonstrated that water cured
specimens always have the highest values followed by sealedcured specimens and air-cured irrespective of type and age of
concrete and test methods. For both concrete compressive
and tensile strength tests, the SCC with silica fume gives the
highest values followed by SCC with y ash and then PC
concrete for all curing periods and conditions. An experimental program carried out by Ravikumar et al. [9], aimed at
producing and evaluating SCC made with high volumes of kiln
ash. The results of this study suggested that quarry dust (QD),
silica fume (SF) and kiln ash (KA) combinations can improve
the workability of SCC, more than QD, SF and KA individually. KA can also have a positive inuence on the mechanical
properties at early ages while SF improved bond between
aggregatematrix resulting from the formation of a less porous
transition zone in concrete. SF can better reducing effect on
total water absorption while QD and KA will not have the
same effect, at 28 days.
2. Objectives of the study
The main objective of this study is to determine the suitable
percentage of y ash, and silica fume in SCC that gives the
highest value of concrete compressive strength. As well as
studying the inuence of different curing conditions.
3. Experimental program
In this investigation, 450 cylinders are tested to investigate
concrete compressive strength of SCC with different percentages of y ash, silica fume and the combination of y ash
and silica fume respectively. In addition to investigate the effect of curing conditions on concrete compressive strength.
All test specimens are 100 mm in diameter and 200 mm in
length as show in Fig. 1. In this study, the major test parameters are: cement content, the percentage of y ash, the percentage of silica fume, and water curing periods.
Table 1
Constituent
Content (%)
SiO2
Fe2O3
Al2O3
CaO
MgO
K2O
N2O
SO3
C1
H2O
97
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.15
0.01
0.5
Table 2
450a
189
612
1109
0.42
a
The quantities of FA and SF are used as the replacement of
cement content by percentage as shown in Table 4.
Table 3
Figure 1
550
231
612
909
0.42
Table 4
Mix No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
a
81
Type I (FA/cement) %
Type II (SF/cement) %
(10/90)
(15/85)
(20/80)
(25/75)
(30/70)
(35/65)
(40/60)
(50/50)
(10/90)
(15/85)
(20/80)
(10
(15
(20
(25
(30
(40
(15
(20
(25
(30
(35
(20
(25
(30
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
10/80)
10/75)
10/70)
10/65)
10/60)
10/50)
15/70)
15/65)
15/60)
15/55)
15/50)
20/60)
20/55)
20/50)
Table 5
Test method
Slump-ow
The spread diameter (T50)
V-funnel
Unit
mm
s
s
Max
650
2
6
800
10
12
For this study, two cement contents are used (i.e., 450 kg/m3
and 550 kg/m3), the quantities of materials used for two
cement content are illustrated in Tables 2 and 3. Three types
of concrete mix are chosen, the rst one (type I) was combination of plain concrete (PC) and y ash (FA), the second
(type II) was combination of PC and silica fume (SF),
and the third one (type III) was combination of PC, FA, and
SF. The percentages of FA and SF to cement are shown in
Table 4.
4. Tests of fresh SCC
82
H.A. Mohamed
Figure 2
Figure 3
b
Compressive strength ( N / mm2)
35
air
30
7 days in water
25
28 days in water
20
15
10
5
0
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
30
air
25
7 days in water
28 days in water
20
15
10
60%
5
0
0%
10%
20%
30
25
20
15
air
10
7 days in water
28 days in water
0
0%
40%
50%
60%
5%
10%
15%
S ilica fume (%)
20%
25%
35
30
25
20
15
air
10
7 days in water
28 days in water
0
0%
5%
10%
15%
S ilica fume (%)
20%
25%
Compressive strength for type II: (a) cement content = 550 kg/m3; (b) cement content = 450 kg/m3.
35
30
25
20
F.A.= 10 %
15
F.A.= 15 %
10
F.A.= 20 %
F.A.= 25 %
F.A.= 30 %
30
25
20
15
F.A.= 10 %
10
F.A.= 15 %
F.A.= 20 %
F.A.= 25 %
F.A.= 30 %
0
0
Figure 6
kg/m3.
35
40
Figure 5
30%
fly ash (%)
Compressive strength for type I: (a) cement content = 550 kg/m3; (b) cement content = 450 kg/m3.
Figure 4
83
10
15
20
25
Water curing period (days)
30
10
15
20
25
Water curing period (days)
30
Effect of curing conditions on compressive strength of type I: (a) cement content = 550 kg/m3; (b) cement content = 450
84
H.A. Mohamed
40
35
30
25
20
15
S.F.= 10 %
10
S.F.= 15 %
S.F.= 20 %
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
30
25
20
15
S.F.= 10 %
10
S.F.= 15 %
S.F.= 20 %
0
0
40
15
20
25
30
Effect of curing conditions on compressive strength of type II: (a) cement content = 550 kg/m3; (b) cement content = 450
35
30
F.A. 10 %
35
S.F. 10 %
Figure 7
kg/m3.
10
F.A.10%+S.F.10%
25
20
15
10
5
0
450
550
F.A. 20 %
30
25
S.F. 20 %
F.A.20%+S.F.20%
20
15
10
5
0
450
550
45
F.A. 15 %
40
35
S.F. 15 %
F.A.15%+S.F.15%
30
25
20
15
6. Conclusions
10
5
0
450
550
85
Increment percentage of concrete compressive strength from 15% FA and 15 % SF to 10 % FA and 10 % SF.
Table 6
Increment
percentage (%)
450 kg/m3
Cement content
550 kg/m3
Cement content
450 kg/m3
Cement content
550 kg/m3
Cement content
450 kg/m3
550 kg/m3
25.4
29.1
21.5
24.4
18
19
Increment percentage of concrete compressive strength from 20% FA and 20 % SF to 10 % FA and 10 % SF.
Table 7
Concrete compressive
strength (N/mm2) (FA 20% + SA 20%)
Increment
percentage (%)
450 kg/m3
Cement content
550 kg/m3
Cement content
450 kg/m3
Cement content
550 kg/m3
Cement content
450 kg/m3
550 kg/m3
25.4
29.1
20.8
23.4
22
24
Failure at aggregate
Figure 11
References
[1] Yahia A, Tanimura M, Shimabukuro A, Shimoyama Y. Effect of
rheological parameters on self compactability of concrete containing various mineral admixtures. In: Skarendahl A, Peterson O,
editors. Proceedings of the rst RILEM international symposium
on self-compacting concrete, Stockholm, 1999. p. 52335.
[2] Perssoiv B. Technical Report, Japan Society for the Promotion of
Science, Report 9803: 12, Division of Building Materials, Lund
Institute of Technology, Lund, 1998.
[3] Nocher M. Flowing Smoothly and Quietly, Advanced Concrete
and Masonry Center, Concrete Quarterly, Issue 198, UK, 2001.
Figure 12
86
H.A. Mohamed
Heba A. Mohamed is a Lecturer in Structural
Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University. Her topics of
research interested are Seismic behavior of at
slabs and shear strength.