Blendedlearning

Blended learning
A synthesis of research
findings in Victorian education
2006-2011
Published by the
Ultranet and Digital Learning Branch
Department of Education and
Early Childhood Development
Melbourne
March 2012
State of Victoria (Department of Education
and Early Childhood Development) 2012
The copyright in this document is owned by the State of Victoria
(Department of Education and Early Childhood Development), or in
the case of some materials, by third parties (third party materials). No
part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the
provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, the National Education Access
Licence for Schools (NEALS) (see below) or with permission.
An educational institution situated in Australia which is not conducted

for profit, or a body responsible for administering such an institution
may copy and communicate the materials, other than third party
materials, for the educational purposes of the institution.
Authorised by the Department of Education
and Early Childhood Development,
2 Treasury Place, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002.
This document is available at
www.education.vic.gov.au/researchinnovation/
Contents
Foreword
1.
Introduction
2.
What is Blended Learning?
2.1 Blended Learning Defined
2.2 Blended Learning Defined in the Victorian Context
2.3 Blended Learning Defined in a National and International

Context
What does blended learning look like?
3.1 Blended Learning Formats
3.2 Designing Blended Learning Activities
3.3 Interaction
10
3.4 Is Blended Learning for Everybody?
12
Blended Learning in Action Victorian Case Studies
14
CASE STUDY 1: Chinese Language Learning With Web 2.0
14
CASE STUDY 2: Ping Online Music Education Project
15
3.
4.
CASE STUDY 3: National Gallery of Victoria Floating World Project

16
5.
CASE STUDY 4: Collaborative Rural Research Trials
18
CASE STUDY 5: VCE e-Biology Project
19
CASE STUDY 6: The Victorian Virtual Learning Network
20
CASE STUDY 7: The Wimmera Rural and Remote Project
20
The Benefits of a Blended Learning Approach
22
5.1 Learning Outcomes
22
5.2 Changes in Student Practices, Behaviours and Attitudes
24
5.3 Teacher Factors
26
5.4 Community and Expert Involvement - Intercultural and Cultural

Opportunities
27
5.5 Addressing Disadvantage
28
5.6 The Advantages of Blended Learning
29
Contents continued
6.
Challenges in Implementing Blended Learning Strategies
30
6.1
Developing Blended Learning Pedagogy
30
6.2
Teacher Support and Professional Development
31
6.3
Technological Challenges
31
6.4
Student Preparation / Support / Transition
32
6.5
Assessment Considerations
33
6.6
Culture and Innovation
33
7.
Summary and Conclusions
34
8.
Moving forward
35
8.1 Considerations at a whole school level
35
8.2 Considerations for Teachers
35
8.3 Considerations for Students
35
8.4 Technology Considerations
35
List of Schools
36
9.
References 39
Foreword
Victoria as a Learning Community, - Extended Special Lecture (Department of
Education and Early Childhood Development, 2011) articulates the
Governments goal of improving student outcomes and empowering our
children and young people to thrive throughout their lives. This aligns with the
Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians
(Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs,
2008) which aims to have all young Australians develop into confident,
creative and successful learners.
Globalisation and technology are continually altering our views of education
and offering new opportunities for learning and engagement in life.
Technology such as web conferencing, the Ultranet, blogs/wikis, virtual worlds
and online gaming and mobile devices such as iPads, mobile phones, digital
cameras and voice recorders are changing the way teachers teach and the
way students learn.
Technology enables learning to extend beyond the classroom walls and
facilitates better access to learning resources. It also supports the creation of
partnerships with the wider school community and equips learners with
contemporary skills necessary for successful participation in life.
Blended learning approaches have amplified the need for school leaders,
teachers, students and the wider community to take advantage of learning
opportunities afforded through improved personalisation, collaboration, and
communication enabled by learning technologies.
Blended learning has many different forms and will continue to evolve as new
technology and practices are introduced. It should not be viewed as a single
model but as an approach that shares the ultimate goal of the provision of
better educational experiences and outcomes.
This publication provides teachers and principals with definitions, benefits and
exemplars of the use of blended learning in the Victorian education context.
I trust you will find this both informative and useful.
Dr Jim Watterston
Deputy Secretary
School Education Group
Blended learning:A synthesis of research findings in Victorian education 2006-2011
1.
Introduction
This paper is a synthesis of project work undertaken between 2006 and 2011
by the Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development
(DEECD). It provides an overview of blended learning definitions and models,
and includes some examples of blended learning activities and projects
conducted in Victorian Government schools. It concludes with some
considerations for the future implementation and/or maximisation of learning
opportunities from such approaches in Victorian schools.
We live in a connected world with unparalleled access to a vast array of
online information and experiences. Our children are growing up in a world
where excitement and opportunities are just a screen touch away.
For many educators and trainers, a blended learning approach provides
innovative educational solutions through an effective mix of traditional
classroom teaching with mobile learning and online activities.
But what is Blended Learning and what does it mean for students, teachers,
parents, school principals and the Victorian education system? How do we
harness these resources to enrich the educational experiences for our
students? How do we tap into this knowledge bank to provide relevant
education and vocational training experiences for our youth? Can we use this
connectivity to build online communities for isolated students and adults in
rural and remote areas? Does this technology have the potential to overcome
disabilities and provide equality of educational opportunity for all? Can we use
blended learning approaches to deliver professional development to all our
teachers and school administrators? Can traditional assessment tools be used
with blended learning? Will a blended learning approach require extra
resources to be provided by schools and/or the education system? Will
parents be convinced their children are receiving a proper education?
Since 2010, the release of the Ultranet, a secure site for managing learning
and collaboration between students, teachers and parents available to all
Victorian Government schools, has placed a greater imperative for teachers to
optimise blended learning opportunities in teaching and learning and
maximise the potential for the online learning it provides.
In the following pages you will find definitions of blended learning and
descriptions of blended learning environments; anecdotes and case studies
from blended learning activities; research findings about the advantages and
benefits of a blended learning approach in Victoria; and some of the
challenges to be faced when implementing blended learning.
Introduction
2.
2.1 Blended Learning Defined

What is Blended Learning and why is it so hard to achieve
consensus on its definition?
Historically, classroom teachers in Victoria, and indeed throughout Australia,
have used a range of learning activities and resources to assist learners to
achieve learning objectives. Face-to-face presentations, visual material,
paper-based assessments, online research and group activities have been the
mainstay of classroom teaching for many decades. More recently mobile
technologies and collaborative Web 2.0 tools have expanded opportunities for
learning.
Blended learning is really no more than a combination of all of these
approaches.
For some teachers, blended learning is describing what theyve been doing
successfully for years: that is, using a range of resources and activities to
provide individualised, student-centred learning experiences for their students.
The real difference today is the unparalleled access to the internet with its rich
sources of information and services and more importantly, the connectivity it
offers students and teachers, particularly the ability to create online
communities and support networks. In addition, there is a growing use of
mobile technologies such as flip cameras, voice recorders, mobile phones and
GPS devices extending learning beyond the classroom walls.
For other teachers, blended learning represents a challenge. They are not
comfortable with nor do they fully understand the technologies and media that
their students use every day, or the potential that these can offer their
learners.
To assist teachers in implementing blended learning activities, this paper
reinforces the concept that blended learning comes in many guises and isnt a
one-size-fits-all educational solution.
Definitions of blended learning range from the very broad where practically
any learning experience that integrates some use of ICTs qualifies, to others
that focus on specific percentages of online curriculum and face-to-face
instruction.
Most people agree that blended learning combines teaching and learning
methods from both face-to-face, mobile and online learning and that it
includes elements of both synchronous and asynchronous online learning
options.
The integration of new mobile technologies and online media is proving highly
effective in helping schools meet the expectations of 21st century learners
while addressing the challenges of limited resources and the special needs of
many students.
However, not everyone is happy with the term blended learning. Oliver and
Tingwell (2003) in their article Can blended learning be redeemed? argue
that blended learning is ill-defined and muddled as a description of particular
forms of teaching with technology. They argue that the term blended learning
may be redundant and gratuitous, as the practice of mixing traditional
classroom methods with technology is widespread.
This summary acknowledges that a broad continuum of definitions exists and
that its definition will continue to evolve in the literature as new technology and
associated skill sets emerge. This paper takes a practical approach to defining
blended learning based on the Victorian experience and will demonstrate the
benefits from such flexible approaches.
Ultimately, the exact definition of blended learning, beyond some
combination of online and face-to-face, may not matter.
International Association for K-12 Online Learning (2008)
2.2 Blended Learning Defined in the Victorian

Context
Based on projects and teaching practice in Victorian schools, blended
learning refers to the planned implementation of a learning model that
integrates student-centred, traditional in-class learning with other flexible
learning methodologies using mobile and web-based online (especially
collaborative) approaches in order to realise strategic advantages for the
education system.
These advantages might include cost benefits, increased access to
educational opportunities, flexibility of workforce deployment, and so on.
2.3 Blended Learning Defined in a National and

International Context
The concept of blended learning is rooted in the idea that learning is not just
a one-time eventlearning is a continuous process. Blending provides
various benefits over using any single learning delivery medium alone..
Singh (2003)
Around Australia, educators have similar definitions for blended learning.

The Tasmanian Department of Education e-School (2011) defines blended
learning as a range of learning opportunities, e.g. online, face-to-face,
community and home to achieve curriculum diversity and promote student
enthusiasm
In 2003, the Australian National Training Authority (ANTA) described blended
learning in Australia as the integrated combination of traditional learning with
web-based online approaches. These simple, practical definitions are
supported by eminent researchers who have defined blended learning as
essentially traditional in-class learning supplemented by online activities and
resources ( Downes, 2008) and blended learning is currently conceived as
the combination of technology and traditional face to face instruction. (Stacey
.
and Mackey, 2009)
In the US, the International Association for K-12 Online Learning (2008)
follows a similar line with its definition: In general terms, blended learning
combines online delivery of educational content with the best features of
classroom interaction and live instruction to personalise learning, allow
thoughtful reflection, and differentiate instruction from student to student
across a diverse group of learners.
Blended learning should be viewed as a pedagogical approach that
combines the effectiveness and socialisation opportunities of the classroom
with the technologically enhanced active learning possibilities of the online
environment, rather than a ratio of delivery modalities.
Dziuban, Hartman and Moskal (2004)
3.
What does blended learning look

like?
3.1 Blended Learning Formats

Some blended learning practitioners worry about the appropriate allocation of
time between traditional face-to-face teaching and learning, and extending
learning beyond the classroom walls with mobile and online technologies.
The actual percentage of time allocated or the blending of the different
activities and approaches is not important. What is important is finding the
right mix or blend that serves each students needs.
In Victorian schools, blended learning comes in many guises although each
application has the essential ingredients of classroom delivery plus mobile
learning and web content with the added inclusion of interaction with
community members and other subject matter experts plus opportunities for
sharing and learning with peers.
In essence, there is a blending of flexible teaching and learning approaches
that include student-teacher, student-student, student-community interactions
and feedback.
The projects described below were derived from the Innovating with
Technologies (IWT) research projects (2008-2011) exploring the impact of ICT
on student learning outcomes.
Stories From Around A Campfire (2010)

This project sought to improve the speaking and listening skills of Prep to
Year 2 students in three rural schools, in the Loddon Campaspe Region of
Victoria. The schools involved used Skype, blogs, interactive whiteboards, flip
cameras, webcams, digital cameras and email to improve communication
skills of learners. The project provided situations that encouraged oral
language development and provided authentic student-student feedback.
The strength of using the flip cameras and Skype was that it provided
opportunities for the students to observe themselves and to self-evaluate as
well as receive feedback from peers.
Teacher, Stories From Around a Campfire (2010)
Ping (2009)
Walking into any of the five rural school classroom spaces when the Ping
(2009) music education project was running, a visitor would have witnessed
the use of virtual delivery approaches to enhance young peoples involvement
in music. In this IWT project students developed their own music composition
using synchronous professional guidance from Melbourne Symphony
Orchestra musicians. Communication took place using web conferencing
technology.
Sharing Our Environment (2010)

This was an IWT project where Prep and Year 1 students at three primary
schools in the Barwon South West Region of Victoria used technology to allow
students to communicate regularly, and co-create and share learnings with
students in neighbouring rural communities whom they had never met. The
students used digital cameras, webcams with Skype, iPods, computers and
some environmental gadgets (rain gauges and bug catchers) to collect, share
and relay their learnings and experiences.
Improving Literacy In ESL/ VCAL Students Undertaking Workplace

Learning (2009)
This was a North Geelong Secondary College IWT project using mobile
technologies (iPods) to extend learning by a group of 10 students from
refugee backgrounds undertaking their Victorian Certificate of Applied
Learning (VCAL) to assist them to gain self-confidence to improve their
language acquisition. Students used the devices in their work placement to
complete word tasks, document occupational health and safety issues; record
oral logs and reflections on their performance; and gather employer feedback
on their daily progress. The students reflections and employer feedback were
then emailed to their classroom teacher for assessment.
3.2 Designing Blended Learning Activities

Well-designed blended learning models offer immediate advantages for the
Victorian school system. However, current trials support the view that there is
no one blended learning model that adequately meets the needs of each and
every learning community.
The National Centre for Vocational Education Research Report One size
doesn't fit all: Pedagogy in the online environment (Brennan, 2003) and the
more recent report by the Department of Education, Employment and
Workplace Relations Exemplar Schools: Using Innovative Learning
Technologies (Holkner, Romeo, Henderson, Auld, Russell, Seah and
Fernando, 2008) both argue that the most successful blended learning models
are ones which best meet all the demands of a local situation.
It is important to recognise that each Australian school is a unique learning
community made up of school leaders, teachers, students and parents.
Each of these communities is influenced by a large number of factors
including, the socio-economic background of the students and parents, the
geographic location of the school, levels of government funding and of
course the quality of teachers and staff.
Holkner et al (2008)
The authors of Issues in Digital Technology in Education: Blended Learning

(Wikibooks, 2009) have identified four broad principles of education design for
blended learning. These are:
A thoughtful integration of face-to-face and fully online instructional

components
Innovative use of technology
Re-thinking the way we teach
Sustained assessment and evaluation of blended learning.
According to Bonk and Graham (2006) in their Handbook of Blended

Learning, blended learning should be approached as a fundamental redesign
of the instructional model with the following characteristics:
A shift from teacher-centred to student-centred instruction in which students

become active and interactive learners (this shift should apply to the entire
course, including face-to-face contact sessions)
Increases in interaction between student-teacher, student-student, studentcontent, and student-outside resources
Integrated formative and summative assessment mechanisms for students

and teachers.
Elements of these design principles are discernible in most Victorian blended

learning projects discussed in the next section.
3.3 Interaction
Research both in Victoria and elsewhere indicates that student satisfaction
with the blended format is directly dependent upon the level of interaction with
teachers and other students. Teachers can increase interaction opportunities
through face-to-face discussion sessions and by using online tools such as
discussion forums, virtual conferencing, virtual world and online games, and
using mobile technologies such as flip cameras and voice recorders to
engage with parents and the wider school community.
Teacher-Student interaction
Podcasting in the Classroom (2006)

For this Wanganui Park Secondary College project a teacher created a series
of VCE biology podcasts which were then posted to a website available for
download.
The website not only allowed people from all around the world to benefit from
the information presented but also allowed the listeners to share their
testimonials of how they have benefited. Teachers no longer needed to have
their students in class with them in order for the students to be learning.
Students can be presented with material (from the teacher and other students)
via podcasts and can be involved in discussions about learning using
discussion boards, blogs and chat rooms outside of the classroom.
See: http://biologyoracle.podomatic.com/
This freed class time for richer, reflective and more creative activities which
engage students and help them to learn more deeply than has happened
previously. Because the bulk of content delivery was taking place out of
class, the traditional idea of a class having one teacher was being challenged.
Student-Student interaction
Sharing My Voice (2010)
For this IWT project, Eltham High School students used iPods to listen to a
wide range of authentic French listening materials 1:1 at their own pace.
Music, podcasts, and apps were sourced and students listened to these
10
intensively. Having completed the listening component of the project, students

then created an audio book in which they were required to read the story they
had written and record their version to the iPods. Drafting occurred using the
devices, and teacher and peer feedback was facilitated through the use of the
iPods. Final story narration demonstrated clear improvement in the lower to
middle band of student performance.
The students then visited the local primary school and taught a French lesson
to Preps 1:1 using the devices confirming their understanding of the content
and giving the Eltham High School students confidence in speaking another
language.
Student-Content interaction
Hiragana, iPods And Japanese Character Recognition (2009)
This was a Derrinallum P-12 School IWT project. The Japanese language
teacher developed a series of podcasts for the students iPods to differentiate
learning (e.g. teach the Japanese characters to lower level students and to
introduce more complex Japanese Hiragana to the more advanced students).
The vodcasts were supported by a range of iPod applications to encourage
students to use their knowledge of hiragana. These included: online games,
online dictionaries and quizzes.
Student-Community interaction
Creating Links within the Bayside Community (2010)
This was a Sandringham College IWT project where students used Global
Positioning System (GPS) devices and geocaching websites to find and hide
caches. The local historical society became involved and provided the
students with local historical information. Students used a group wiki and
individual blogs for reflection. Students learnt to identify and hide caches
(which required them to load the GPS information onto a geocaching website),
and they learnt to research and investigate the historical significance of some
11
caches. The students checked the geocaching website for feedback on the
cache, and to make improvements and maintain the cache. Students shared
their experiences and reflections on a weekly blog and their group Wikis.
Students also developed stronger community links through the historical
society, interviewing members of the community and finding out the historical
importance of the different areas of Sandringham. It gave them a sense of
pride and belonging to the local area.
3.4 Is Blended Learning for Everybody?

Blended learning comes in many shapes and sizes there is no right way or
wrong way, no correct formula or single right ratio of face-to-face, online time
and self-paced activities in and beyond the classroom. Each approach is
based on the needs of the students, the curriculum and the resources
available.
Victorian DEECD projects described here have been conducted with students
from Prep to Year 12.
Is Blended Learning Different from Distance Education?

Distance education offers one form of blended learning.
Traditionally distance education provision has been predominantly for
students who through their geographical isolation have not been able to
attend classes.
Distance education providers were early adopters of ICT in education, notably
the various Schools of the Air with their use of radio, then video and now the
full range of communications and online technologies (including online
conferencing, social media websites, wikis/blogs, email and virtual worlds).
The increased integration of ICT, particularly Web 2.0 technology into
distance education provision has broadened the scope of delivery to include
learners who choose not to attend classroom education as well as those who
dont have the choice through their personal circumstances e.g. ill health.
Blended Learning In the Early Years Classroom

While at times, it has been seen as controversial to use technology so
regularly with Early Years students, the parents, students and wider
community support the trend.
The Prep students are now using appropriate language when working in
groups and during problem-solving and decision-making activities, which
would be expected from more mature students. They are showing
responsibility and respect towards the schools and others belongings and
understand the consequences of each others actions.
Teacher, Sharing Our Environment (2010)
Blended Learning and Rurality

Robotics for Rural (2008)
This was an IWT project where teachers and students from eight small rural
schools in Gippsland worked with Year 5 and 6 students on using Lego
robotics equipment to produce a Lego robotics program, with mentoring from
a local secondary school via webcams.
12
The implementation of the Lego Robotics program for any of our small
schools alone would have been a very large commitment in terms of the
allocation of human resources and funding.
The geographical spread of our eight cluster schools has meant this
program has built relationships for students and has been an important
transition experience for secondary education.
Teacher, Robotics for Rural (2008)
13
4.
Blended Learning in Action

Victorian Case Studies
Between 2006 and 2011, the DEECD through its Innovation and Next Practice
Division conducted a number of action research projects using ICTs designed
to cater for specific cohorts of students and teachers where there was an
identified need or opportunity.
The Emerging Technology (2006-2007), Innovating With Technologies
(2008-2011), and KnowledgeBank: Next Generation (2008-9) trials were all
designed to encourage the innovative use of ICTs in schools to improve
student outcomes, build workforce capability and promote system
improvement (DEECD 2010).
The projects supported teachers in schools by building capacity to provide full
curriculum coverage for all students and to work together to optimise learning
opportunities for all students whilst minimising disadvantage (rural/remote
students, indigenous students, students with disabilities, and disengaged
learners etc.).
CASE STUDY 1: Chinese Language Learning

With Web 2.0 Project (KB:NG 2009)
The Chinese language learning with Web 2.0 project investigated how Web
2.0 technologies may facilitate and support the acquisition of Asian languages
(in this case, Mandarin) in schools. Four teachers and 80 students in two
primary and two secondary schools participated in the trial. Three of the
schools were suburban schools with one rural secondary school. The
students comprised four classes Year 5, Year 6, Year 7 and a mixed Year 9
and 10 class.
The participating teachers were asked to explore how the use of Web 2.0
tools and technologies, when embedded within the curriculum, might affect:
student learning outcomes, in listening and speaking, reading and writing
student attitudes and levels of engagement
student and teacher confidence and capability in using ICTs
communication and collaboration between students and teachers
changes in teacher practice that reflect learning needs of students of

Mandarin Chinese
the level of contact hours students have with the language and the
increased opportunities to be immersed in the language using Web 2.0
technologies between classes.
14
The students used lessons and activities downloaded from a wiki, and games
and videos sourced from the web. Students demonstrated their learning by
producing original audio, video and written texts, and these were uploaded to
a social networking site (Ning) for sharing.
The teachers had three online meetings via virtual classroom technologies
and kept in regular contact through phone and email. The meetings were held
as a forum for exchange of experiences and suggestions regarding technical
issues and good practice in managing student use of the online spaces.
The findings included:
student engagement, confidence and motivation to learn Chinese increased
classroom behaviour improved with more students staying on task
the school community, family and friends were able to get involved in the
learning
increased interest in using Chinese to communicate with other learners and

native speakers
a wiki served well as a resource centre especially for the younger students
to get access to the audio and video resources beyond the language
classroom
students showed greater initiative and independent learning
teachers increased their knowledge and confidence in Web 2.0 and ICT
using new skills and creative activity gave teachers increased enjoyment in
teaching.
CASE STUDY 2: Ping Online Music Education

Project (IWT 2009)
The Ping (2009) online music education project trialled new ways of delivering
music education using a blended learning approach. It incorporated inclassroom teaching artists, Web 2.0 and video conferencing technologies.
Focusing on music composition, this project was delivered over two terms in
2009 to four schools in the Wimmera region, targeting 70 students in Years 6
and 7. The project used professional guidance (synchronous) and recordings
from Melbourne Symphony Orchestra musicians.
15
The Ping (2009) project was initially conceived as a remote delivery program.
It was anticipated that the blended learning model would result in:
a better integration of the complex mix of technologies and skills involved,

including music composition, and digital audio editing
more assistance to schools in training and supporting teachers in all the key
elements of the project within a short time frame.
Ping (2009) provided a basic introduction to composition by using music

technology to lower the barriers for access. No music notation was used
during the pilot with the aim of including students with no previous music
experience.
The pilot project found:
live video conference presentations by arts experts are extremely engaging

and lead to strong educational outcomes for students
listening and arranging skills are actively developed through composition

activities using music technology
literacy skills are actively developed through reading and writing blog posts
and comments
the blended learning model using classroom-based teaching artists coupled

with Web 2.0 and interactive video conferences, did increase students
access to music curriculum resources and experts
the project can be successfully run by generalist teachers if music teachers

are unavailable
that although this project substantively targeted music curriculum, similar

projects might extend and improve students learning in other curriculum
areas.
Ping (2009) demonstrated the potential for a blended learning model to be

used widely in music education. It would comprise:
Web 2.0 technologies to provide students with creative read/write spaces

online
teaching artists in Melbourne bringing expert real-time music and music

technology skills into rural classrooms to support teachers and students
students undertaking creative composition tasks to apply the knowledge

learnt from the video conferences
sharing of students work through uploading their compositions as mp3s to

the Ping website
ongoing feedback and commentary on students' work (teachers and peer to

peer) through posting comments on the Ping blog
professional development for teachers.
Future online music projects might use an increased repertoire of music styles
that include jazz, rock, hip hop, electronic and folk music. This would be
enabled by developing additional cultural partnerships.
CASE STUDY 3: National Gallery of Victoria

Floating World Project (IWT 2009-10)
The Pictures of the Floating World (2009) project was developed in
partnership between DEECD and the National Gallery of Victoria (NGV) with
funding from Multimedia Victorias Broadband Innovation Fund.
The Pictures of the Floating World (2009) resource featured an interactive
scriptwriting activity, based on characters sourced from the Floating World
16
artworks. Using a mixture of traditional scriptwriting methods and animation

techniques, students were able to explore and create their own Floating
World-inspired digital stories using a variety of ICT media. Although Floating
World was based on Japanese artworks, it was designed to have a broad
appeal across all areas of the curriculum.
The project had two distinct phases. Phase 1, Pictures of the Floating
World: from Japanese Woodblock Prints to Digital Story Telling (2009),
involved the digitalisation of an exhibition of 19th century Japanese ukiyo-e
woodblock prints from the NGV Asian art collection which was then packaged
as an online resource for schools. A central feature of this resource was an
interactive script-writing game Stories From Old Japan, where students could
use various elements of the Floating World resources (objects, music,
backgrounds, and characters from the original woodblock prints) to create
their own stories of old Japan. The artwork was supplemented with videos
relating to Japanese culture, including a workshop on traditional woodblock
printing techniques and musicians playing traditional instruments. See:
http://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/ngvschools/FloatingWorld/stories/
Phase 2, Scaling Up Pictures Of The Floating World (2010), built on Phase
1 and demonstrated the capacity to scale up innovation and share practice
across 20 rural, regional and metropolitan schools.
The project started with three broad aims:
explore the efficacy of a model of knowledge transfer based on Web 2.0

principles (read/write/co-produce) in making resources developed by the
NGV more accessible/ usable for Victorian schools
document how teachers and students in different school settings use the
Floating World resources and evaluate the impact of these resources on
teaching practices and learning outcomes
evaluate the process of scaling up an educational innovation across 20

diverse school settings.
Phase 2 of the project demonstrated the capacity for teachers to share best
practice through an active online community. It also demonstrated the
potential of the Floating World resource to generate a deeper interest and
17
understanding of Japanese culture and art among participating students and

teachers.
CASE STUDY 4: Collaborative Rural Research

Trials (Rural IWT projects 2010)
The Collaborative Rural Research Trials were six projects (over 24 schools)
trialling the use of Web 2.0 tools to link students in rural schools. The primary
objectives were to overcome issues of rural isolation; maximise learning
opportunities for rural students; and at the same time, enable students to cocreate and share work between schools to enhance their learning outcomes.
The projects included:
Comparing Ecosystems (2010)
Overcoming ICT Barriers In The Seven Hills Cluster (2010)
Rural Kids Connected (2010)
Using Web 2.0 For Languages Other than English in the Campaspe
Network (2010)
Stories From Around A Campfire (2010)
Our community is keen to continue this type of collaborative learning, and to

work towards utilising the Ultranet as the collaborative learning platform.
Teacher, Comparing Ecosystems (2010)
The trials were highly successful with a number of significant findings

emerging.
Some of the reported outcomes included:
teachers stated that they used greater integration of Web 2.0 especially
collaborative real-time communication technologies in their teaching and in
curriculum planning
students used online tools such as blogs and shared documents to reflect
and discuss their learnings with their peers
teachers relinquished their leadership role and allowed the students to

explore their own ways of personalising their learning with the new
technology
the collaborative nature in which the students created project tasks led to
better quality learning outcomes and multi skilling (i.e. questioning,
prompting discussion, reflection, speaking etiquette)
18
students oral skills improved as they communicated across schools and

when working in groups
the opportunities for the students to view their own performance and that of
their peers in the cluster schools heightened their awareness of the
necessity to arrange their thoughts, use a clear voice, and use appropriate
eye contact when collaborating using web conferencing.
CASE STUDY 5: VCE e-Biology Project (Hume

region, 2011)
The e-Biology project combined the lessons learnt from a Podcasting in the
classroom (2006) project with a Country Education Project framework
developed as part of the e-Kids science digital learning program. This
program aimed to enhance online learning provision and opportunities within
rural communities by encouraging staff in these schools to develop and
provide online learning in an area where they have expertise; providing
professional development for teachers and community members; and
engaging teacher trainee organisations in the provision of digital learning.
The project focused on the provision of VCE Biology Units 3 and 4 in a
blended learning environment, using the Virtual Conference Centre for
synchronous web conference sessions with students. More than 38 students
participated in the project from eight rural schools across all five rural regions.
Ongoing evaluation of the project in 2012 will ensure that both teacher and
student reflections are captured to support the overarching research question:
How can blended learning, teaching and assessment broaden, enhance and
improve learning outcomes for rural students completing VCE Biology?
The project reported the following outcomes and benefits from the project thus
far, such as:
better access to provision of VCE Biology Unit 3 and 4 courses to students

in rural schools via web site posted content and weekly web conferencing
sessions
enhanced teacher capacity in facilitating learning in a blended learning

environment with a largely online component
19
the sharing of strategies and practices with the education community to

support effective pedagogy and assessment in blended learning
environments
the impact of an inter-school team-teaching approach to curriculum planning

and delivery
anecdotal evidence of improvements in student performance.
CASE STUDY 6: The Victorian Virtual Learning

Network (2008-2010)
The Victorian Virtual Learning Network (VVLN) project was a two-year
proof of concept project investigating the ways of providing delivery of online
VCE courses in Mathematical Methods, Physics and Psychology using a
learning management system across a network of seven schools in the
Loddon-Mallee Region.
The initiative was a response to the emergent and changing demands of
contemporary students. The project also responded to the difficulties rural
schools face in recruiting and retaining highly skilled staff to teach VCE Maths,
Physics and Psychology specialist subjects.
The VVLN was investigating the delivery of these three subjects to remote
students using a blended learning approach with the following features:
high quality interactive digital resources that are available to students at any
time
regular support from the facilitator using online collaboration via a range of
Web 2.0 technologies
collaboration with the classroom teacher to support the online instruction
interaction with students in other schools to enhance the learning.
The blended learning model was designed to test the versatility of learning
forums and interactions; the capacity to customise student learning
experiences to realise greater efficiencies from the existing ICT infrastructure;
and to build superior curriculum content.
The project had a key focus of providing professional learning for teachers in
the use of the new online and emerging technologies to ensure they have the
skills in developing and delivering curriculum to students in an online
environment, and to build the face-to face component of the model.
Some of the findings from this project included:
online curriculum development was a far lengthier process than anticipated,

especially when resources could not be sourced from elsewhere
delivering subjects across schools required substantial cultural changes in

adopting new approaches to teaching and in risk management
there is considerable work involved in aligning timetables and in

establishing a cohesive community to deliver across schools.
CASE STUDY 7: The Wimmera Rural and

Remote Project (2008-2010)
The Wimmera Rural and Remote (2008-2010) project ran concurrently with
the VVLN project described above and involved 11 secondary colleges across
the Western district of Victoria. The projects primary aim was to determine
what are the leading practices, innovative solutions and best mix of resources
20
required to address issues of educational disadvantage experienced by

students, teachers and schools in rural and remote locations.
Key to this was the identification of the best mix of viable and adaptable
provision solutions in rural Victoria. The project drew on the earlier local
experience of online learning in the Grampians and the blended education
delivery model that operates in Canada.
The project was able to deliver curriculum across rural schools using video
conferencing technologies. The project had to establish a community of
learning across the schools, standardise infrastructure, develop professional
development for users (practitioners and students), align school timetables,
and establish protocols for assessment and student support.
21
5.
The Benefits of a Blended

Learning Approach
The research projects completed by the schools described herein and in other
INPD supported projects have shown that blended learning approaches
enhance learning outcomes through:
inclusion of more differentiated/personalised instruction
increased access to resources, experts and learning opportunities
more authentic and student driven tasks being incorporated into the
curriculum
higher student engagement
greater opportunities for collaboration (especially beyond the classroom and

involving the wider school community)
exposure to a wide range of Web 2.0 technologies and acquisition of

contemporary literacy skills
better access to infrastructure and, anytime, anywhere learning.
5.1 Learning Outcomes

The series of trials in Victorian schools from 2006-2011 have demonstrated
improvements in student learning, attitudes and engagement as a result of
integrating blended approaches into teaching and learning.
The projects in these blended learning trials offered greater options for
personalisation of study and put students in control of their own learning.
Students were able to vary their pace of learning, drawing on as few or as
many resources as necessary, choosing tasks/resources that best suited their
learning styles and level of prior knowledge. Students could use teacher
created vodcasts to review class work, practise their knowledge of a text by
playing their aligned online games, and demonstrate knowledge of principles
by recounting their own understanding of the topics through claymation
storytelling.
Blended learning approaches allowed students to shine in competencies other

than the traditional literacies, as leaders, ICT technical experts, cultural
experts, resource managers, and negotiators. They also acquired new
literacies of online protocols (cybersafety), intercultural understanding through
exposure to global connections, and constructing/synthesising knowledge
from non-linear content.

Learning Approach
22
As a result, students became more informed, more resourceful and

constructed their own learning paths, ultimately producing better work outputs.
Increased system knowledge of how to use and integrate ICTs into better
teaching and learning practices raised expectations and outcomes for
students.
Access to infrastructure assisted both teachers and students to achieve better
outcomes through flexible access to content instruction and experts.
It enabled their work to expand beyond the classroom boundaries and
provided students with the means to document and reflect on their learning,
and share and validate their learnings through their personal networks. By
using such tools as digital portfolios, films, and games they were able to
create evidence that demonstrated deeper conceptual understanding, enquiry
and knowledge.
Connected Learning
The Victorian blended approaches facilitated connected learning.
Students became better connected to their learning environments both inschool and beyond the school. This included teachers, coaches, peers and
community experts, locally and globally.
The portability of ICT devices and the ease of sharing the learning outputs via
a range of online options extended learning opportunities well beyond the
classroom walls through online conferencing, blogging, forums and discussion
23
boards. Students tended to produce more considered projects when their

work was likely to be shared or viewed by parents, experts and their peers.
Social networking, mobile technology and digital literacy are part of their
regular, everyday lives and we are doing them an injustice if we dont include
it in our daily teaching.
5.2 Changes in Student Practices, Behaviours

and Attitudes
Greater student engagement and motivation for completing tasks were
observed. This has been attributed to familiarity with technologies already
used by students outside the classroom and the novelty of some of the ICTs
used in blended learning. As an example, online games were used
successfully in exploring character roles and narratives with boys studying
Year 9 English who previously showed little interest in reading books.
Collaborative tools (virtual conferencing), social networking (e.g.

SuperClubsPLUS) and gaming were especially popular.
The breadth of learning tasks that ICTs can accommodate also contributed to
higher levels of student engagement. In one example, students could test
their knowledge through quizzes, acquire new knowledge through games and
reflect on their learning by producing their own podcasts all on the one device,
the iPod. Students began to control the construction of knowledge as there

Learning Approach
24
was less dependence on traditional instruction and more self-driven tasks

were allocated.
Students changed their behaviors to become more reflective, collegial and
collaborative (engaging in peer coaching and team activities) and far more
accepting of peer review and external feedback. Engaging in more reflective
and self-monitoring tasks also enhanced their understanding.
Changes to the teacher-student relationship were also noticed when students
were empowered to act as leaders, coaches, mentors and technical experts.
Teachers were freed from having to understand the technologies, so spent
less time on technical instruction and more time supporting learning.
A teacher participating in the Ping (2009) project noted that the students
coped well with the new learning environment and as the project progressed
felt more comfortable with it: The kids just seem to do it naturally! (Teacher)
One teacher from the Chinese Language Learning with Web 2.0 (2009)
project observed that motivating students in language learning was often a
challenge but that the use of blended approaches made the task so much
easier.
A teacher from the Sharing Our Environment (2010) project commented that
some students who were reluctant to communicate openly with others, were
able to speak freely and contribute to class conversations after Skyping
neighboring rural schools. In the same project, students enjoyed seeing the
different work produced by other students and often included some of the
ideas in their own work.
A similar outcome was also observed in the Stories from Around a
Campfire (2010) project, where teachers noted that providing opportunities
for the students to view their own performance and that of their peers in other
schools heightened their awareness of the need to arrange their thoughts, use
a clear voice, and use appropriate eye contact.
25
Student Comment from Victorian Projects

Today I created a new piece of music. I think this is my best one so far! This
music features the, dun nu dun nu, from Jaws! Also slow soft sounds and
other cello noises! I made this music after we watched and listened to
musicians from the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra in Melbourne.
Year 7 student, Hawkesdale P12 College, Ping (2009)
Teacher Comments From Victorian Projects

He's a student who has some problems with some other classes, but he
was thriving... I think it had a great effect on him ....
Instrumental Music Teacher, Ping (2009)
Using Skype with the students made conversations more student-centred as

other students were asking questions and prompting discussions.
5.3 Teacher Factors

Improved Pedagogy, Teacher Skills and Confidence
Research outcomes from Victorian blended learning projects reinforce current
thinking that the positive impact of ICT on student learning outcomes is
strongly linked to improved pedagogy and course design, especially the
development of more authentic, studentcentered learning tasks.
When ICTs were fully integrated into classroom practices, (embedding them
as opposed to just adding technologies), it was noticed that teachers took a
more deliberate approach to lesson planning.
They focused more intently on developing tasks relevant to a student-centred
approach to learning activity design; designing tasks to accommodate
different learning styles and purposes; making use of more diverse teaching
resources; and improving their understanding of the technologies and subject
content.
The research revealed that teacher confidence and knowledge of teaching
with ICTs contributed to a more engaging and considered curriculum, and
subsequently, better student outcomes.
Changes in Relationships with Students

Because students were allowed to assume the roles of leaders, mentors and
co-creators, a new trust developed between teachers and students.
Teacher Development
The Ping (2009) project demonstrated the potential to build teacher capacity
by engaging classroom teachers with Web 2.0 pedagogies in their classroom
practices.
In the Rural Kids Connected (2010) project, teachers used Microsoft
Communicator, Microsoft Live Meeting, Elluminate, Google Docs, blogs, and
email for the majority of the collaborative planning. This enabled regular
planning and professional development sessions to be carried out in a virtual
environment, increasing participation and reducing travel. Teachers were also
exposed to a variety of content creation tools, like GoAnimate and
Voicethread. Google Docs was particularly useful in co-developing curriculum
and assessment.

Learning Approach
26
In the past our teaching practice was to explain and model appropriate oral
language skills to the students. We would instruct the students, provide
situations that encouraged oral language and provide feedback. The strength
of using the flip cameras and Skype was that it provided opportunities for the
students to observe themselves and to self evaluate. More importantly these
tools successfully engaged the students.
Teacher, Stories from Around a Campfire (2010)
How can I prepare them for a digital world if I myself am not yet ready?
Teacher, Stories from Around a Campfire (2010)
5.4 Community and Expert Involvement Intercultural and Cultural Opportunities

Teachers learnt from their involvement in these blended learning trials that
they didnt have to be experts on everything and that the students didnt
expect them to be the founts of all knowledge. Projects like Ping (2009) and
the Chinese Language Learning With Web 2.0 (2009) enabled the students
to interact with community leaders and other subject experts in areas where
this wasnt possible in a face-to-face setting on a regular basis.
Students participating in the Using Web 2.0 for Indonesian in the
Campaspe Network (2010) project hosted three Indonesian exchange
teachers and used a range of Web 2.0 technologies (e.g. voice threads,
Screencaster, Glogster and Wikispace) to enhance their language skills.
27
In the NGV Floating Worlds Project (2009) students engaged with curators
of the National Gallery whilst in the Creating Links with The Bayside
Community Project (2010) students drew on expertise of local historians and
local residents.
5.5 Addressing Disadvantage

Rurality Connecting Small Rural Schools
Projects like Rural Kids Connected (2010) used blended learning as a way
of connecting small schools in a cluster, allowing students to communicate
regularly with other students from similar rural communities.
The technology not only allowed the students to further develop their ICT
skills, the more exciting methods of communicating also helped enhance their
communication skills. Students who were previously reluctant to engage in
conversation began talking more freely when speaking with other students
from different schools.
Students used a variety of technology such as easy speak microphones, flip
cameras and digital still cameras to create videos and slideshows to share
with the students at the other schools. Prep and Year One students used
Skype on a touch screen computer to present their project work and writing to
students from the other schools. They also communicated through written
letters and emails.
The success of the Rural Kids Connected (2010) project encouraged one
community to comment that they were keen to continue the collaborative
learning approach and hoped to use the Ultranet as the collaborative learning
platform.
These rural projects also assisted with isolation and transition to secondary
school by making connections with students in their primary years.
The Ping (2009) project demonstrated that a blended learning model for
music education has potential to address and alleviate access to high quality
musical resources for rural schools in South-West Victoria.
The use of a blended learning model and the provision of digital resources
provided a foundation for schools with limited music instruction to incorporate
high quality music education into their curriculum offerings. The project was
able to excite and engage the students sense of musicality.
Disengagement
By embedding blended approaches using ICT in science with a focus on
living things students have experienced higher levels of engagement with a
significant improvement in their observational skills, ability to collect and
represent data, ability to correctly identify mini beasts, understand what a
habitat is and the impact of different environmental conditions and an
increase in their understanding and use of scientific language.
Teacher, Comparing Ecosystems (2010)
Similar observations were made in other VELS domains, especially in English

and mathematics, where games, online quizzes and learners creating their
own podcasts and animations kept students more engaged and even seeking
their own learning opportunities.
Special Needs
The blended learning approach in these trials assisted students with special
needs and preference for particular learning styles. Students who struggled
with writing skills were able to express their understanding of concepts and
Learning Approach
28
reflections through student produced vodcasts. Students with Asbergers

developed confidence with socialisation and oral competency by making films
using green screen technologies.
Students with disabilities used the electronic whiteboard and web cameras to
view their own actions and achievements.
This visual recording has been crucial for young learners who find it difficult
to write or recount without a visual aid.
5.6 The Advantages of Blended Learning

From a pedagogical perspective, blended learning aims to incorporate the
best aspects of face-to-face classroom learning experiences with the best of
mobile and online learning experiences.
This allows:
an increase in learning outcome measures and lowering of attrition rates

compared to fully online courses (Dziuban, Hartman & Moskal, 2004)
an opportunity for students to practise technology skills in navigating online

course materials and creating their own digital content for assessment
an increase in student-teacher and student-student interaction through the

use of communication tools like discussion forums, blogs and shared web
content on the electronic whiteboard
the ability to reserve face-to-face time for interactive activities, such as

higher-level discussions, small group work, debates, demonstrations, or lab
activities.
For students, the appeal of blended learning includes:
flexibility and the freedom to learn anytime, anywhere
some level of control over the pacing of their learning. Difficult concepts
can be reviewed as often as necessary
more engaging content that they can create and use their own initiative, and
networks to shape
the opportunity to engage and draw on expertise that would otherwise not
be available to them without costly travel, such as virtual conferencing with
zoo/museum/galley staff or virtual excursions to overseas historical or
culturally significant landmarks.
29
6.
Challenges in Implementing
Blended Learning Strategies
The trial projects have identified a number of challenges for teachers and
students to implementing blended learning strategies:
developing blended pedagogy
teacher support and professional development
technological challenges
student preparation/support and transition
assessment considerations
culture and innovation.
6.1
Developing Blended Learning Pedagogy
For our teachers, especially those new to our school, the initial challenge is
more a matter of mindset than an academic change.
International Association for K-12 Online Learning (2008)
Teaching using a blended approach can be challenging for some as it may

require the acquisition of different teaching skills, re-designing the curriculum
and the inclusion of new teaching and learning opportunities, managing the
learning content both online, in-class and beyond the classroom walls, and
preparing students to work in blended modes.
Most negative feelings towards blended forms of learning tend to be
generated by poorly designed approaches. It takes a great deal of thought
and careful planning to deliver a quality learning experience regardless of the
mode of delivery (Idaho Digital Learning Professional Development, 2009).
Adopting a blended learning approach must start with a re-examination of the
intended learning outcomes. The teacher needs to design learning activities
that support these intended learning outcomes, personalise or differentiate
learning and then integrate these activities effectively with the required
assessment tools.
Teachers should prepare their students for the blended learning style and
discuss the new roles and responsibilities. Some students wont be used to
working independently or may be unfamiliar with some of the technologies, so
support mechanisms will need to be put in place for these students.
At the heart of blended learning redesign is the goal to engage students in

critical discourse and reflection. Course redesign is not just about putting
courses online. It is about rethinking the way we deliver instruction in light of
the possibilities that new technology offers.
Garrison & Vaughan (2007)
30
6.2 Teacher Support and Professional

Development
Feedback from the trials indicated the capacity for teachers to incorporate
new technologies into teaching and learning programs may be limited without
an expanded time commitment, and better support from IT staff and additional
professional development.
Professional development options to be considered include adding new
competencies to the curricula, assessment schemes more suited to blended
delivery, and graduate training to encourage blended teaching and learning
approaches across all curriculum areas.
Other options might include motivating and/or rewarding teachers for the
innovative use of blended learning approaches to improve student outcomes
plus support from peers and technical experts.
Teacher training needs to include and refine competencies of teachers in
taking on a more facilitative role: skills such as questioning, creativity,
observation, differentiation/scaffolding, and facilitating collaboration and
networking opportunities and especially in understanding of and imparting of
knowledge of online protocols (such as cyber ethics and intellectual property).
Support for teachers can often come from peers. The Overcoming ICT
Barrier In The Seven Hills Cluster (2010) project allowed the teachers from
each school to communicate more effectively, and to plan curriculum tasks
together, where previously they would only meet on cluster days or on an adhoc basis.
Some teachers in these trials were able to pair up with literacy and Ultranet
coaches, as well as cultural partners (zoo, museum, gallery, state library
experts) to achieve better outcomes from blended learning projects.
6.3
Technological Challenges
Access to devices was generally not a major issue in these projects, as

schools were provided with a grant to enable them to purchase devices.
However in all cases, the grant was not sufficient to support one-to-one
access. Teachers employed techniques to enable devices to be shared - by
having class sets and using rotations and/or by sharing device functionality
through headphone splitters or interactive whiteboards, or assigning
collaborative tasks that require sharing e.g. GPS and geocaching activities. It
was very common for a number of technologies to be used within the one
task. On the whole students viewed access as a privilege and worked hard to
keep it.
Teachers participating in this research reported that technical support was
generally available and is becoming less of an issue because devices are
becoming more intuitive, teachers are offered professional development and
most schools have some allocation of funds for technical support. Both
students and teachers acquired more knowledge of the devices through these
projects and collaborative teaching reduced the reliance on one teacher
problem-solving technical issues. Access to technical assistance and ICT
training opportunities remains an issue for some educators.
Ping (2009), Floating Worlds (2009-10) and Chinese Language Learning
With Web 2.0 (2009)
These projects identified a number of technological issues that needed to be
resolved: a lack of bandwidth and IT support; web proxies and internet filters
impacting on program delivery; and the cost of student access to the internet.
Ping also identified the need for improved audio fidelity to avoid compromising
31
the quality of voice and musical instruments. Some of these issues have
been resolved by higher bandwidths and changes to the standard operating
environment by using eduSTAR and the Ultranet.
Ping (2009)
In the participating schools, the lack of broadband bandwidth and IT support
were issues that hindered the rural schools use of digital resources. Web
proxies and filtering of internet content also had an impact upon the delivery of
Ping into some schools. Schools also underestimated the amount of
bandwidth required to run the Ping project.
School practices, such as charging students for internet access, had an
impact on all students fully participating in the Ping program. The three
participating secondary schools all charged their students for bandwidth. This
affected student learning and the outcomes of the project.
Floating Worlds (2009-10)

Official school broadband speeds appeared adequate, however most
participating schools reported that if a whole class was engaged in interactive
internet use the broadband speed slowed to a crawl. This limited the capacity
of schools to make optimal use of Web 2.0 technologies.
Some schools set a financial limit on students downloads, and then charge
students for any further costs. Where online resources are recommended by
the Department, this should be accompanied by advice on how to minimise or
remove the financial burden on students.
Chinese Language Learning With Web 2.0 (2009)

The teachers reported mostly positive experiences during the trial, however all
four encountered difficulties in the integration of Web 2.0 tools in the language
classroom due to a variety of technical and policy issues including:
training in the relevant ICT skills
familiarity with Web 2.0 tools
a commitment to collaboration and student-centred learning that should

underpin the languages program
sufficient class access to the internet and relevant hardware
sufficient time for professional learning, program planning and resourcing.
6.4
Student Preparation / Support / Transition
Its not only the teachers who need support for the transition to a blended
learning environment. Students also need preparation and support for the
transition to becoming more independent learners and self-managers.
Support for Students the role of the wider workforce including

paraprofessionals
Daz and Entonado (2009) noted that the important role of teachers in blended
learning is in facilitating of the teaching/learning process, combining the
explanation of theoretical contents with activities, and encouraging
interaction.
Students also required additional assistance in understanding internet
protocols especially those of cybersafety and intellectual property.
Intercultural understanding was also an area that required guidance.
Students can also engage expert non-teachers (paraprofessionals) to assist
with specific content teaching, for example scientists, especially through the
use of Web 2.0 technologies.
32
6.5
Assessment Considerations
The way in which teachers assessed student outcomes in these blended

learning projects changed, for example:
reflection was encouraged, so students could go back to revisit their

products such as podcasts and refine them
teachers were able to assess many more skills than just traditional literacy
(e.g. reading, writing) in activities such as digital story creation e.g. group
work, media literacy and technical editing skills
technologies that enabled frequent feedback (online quizzes) allowed for

differentiated intervention
engaging students in creating their own podcasts, films and games allowed
teachers to assess deeper conceptual thinking and creativity
monitoring using ICT was often instantaneous and timely, offering

immediate opportunities for remedial action
collaboration and peer review became part of the formal assessment using
ICTs especially through blogging, discussion boards and film making, and
this encouraged better performance
assessment criteria in these projects were also more transparent to

students (possibly due to the use of rubrics), raising expectations in
performance
the public nature of students work and having an authentic audience

(through blogging, web pages, online chat etc) made students more aware
of social etiquette, the need to present better products and encouraged
healthy competition between students raising academic achievement.
6.6
Culture and Innovation
The system and cultural influences on student performance, teacher practice

and device access were profound.
Leadership and Peer Support

Teachers involved in these projects reported receiving encouragement from
their school leadership and peers. Some principals came to visit the
classrooms, provided extra time release, promoted the projects further e.g. to
regional directors etc. Peers showed support by showing interest in the
project, providing encouragement/ assistance, and by creating an expectation
that there would be a flow-on effect across the school. This raised
expectations, empowered teachers and students, contributing to better
outcomes.
An Innovative Culture
A culture that encouraged innovation was typical for the success of these
blended learning projects. In general the culture was accepting of change and
risk and looked to overcome issues and to challenge students to do better.
33
7.
Adopting a blended learning approach offers the appeal of combining different

learning elements using the power of ICT while retaining a human touch.
A blended learning model should describe a planned and deliberate
educational activity that integrates student-centred learning, classroom-based
teaching and learning with mobile and web-based online approaches based
on individual learners and their specific needs.
Learning initiatives such as the Victorian Virtual Learning Network Pilot for the
Loddon and Grampians Regions and the Innovations Hub in Northern Region,
as well as the Rural Education provision initiative are all based on the need for
online learning infrastructure, policy and practices to facilitate 21st century
learning.
The Ultranet supports these aims by providing online collaborative spaces,
tools and digital resources in a stateoftheart 21st century learning
environment that enhance the physical classroom. This provides opportunities
for students, parents and educators to share information, collaborate and
engage in learning in a secure space. The Ultranet provides seamless
asynchronous and synchronous eLearning environments to all Victorian
Government schools.
There is a growing world-wide trend in initiatives that are explicit about the
availability of learning anywhere, anytime. The underpinning notion is that
teachers will need to be upskilled quickly to cope with the virtual learning
opportunities in the classroom.
34
8.
Moving forward
The following is a series of questions for school leaders and teachers to

consider when implementing blended learning in their schools. They address
the needs of leadership, teachers, students, parents and infrastructure.
Although none of the questions below are specific to a particular technology,
the role of the Ultranet in supporting blended learning should be a key
consideration as principals and teachers reflect on blended learning
approaches to optimise student learning.
8.1 Considerations at a whole school level

Is there a whole school approach to blended learning (in terms of whole
school culture, shared investment, and a common vision etc)?
How can school leaders support blended learning at a whole school level in
relation to:
Building teacher capacity
Scaffolding students transition
Engaging parents and wider school community.
Has the school developed sufficient networks and collaborative arrangements

to maximise blended learning opportunities?
8.2 Considerations for Teachers

What are the capabilities that teachers need to teach effectively in a blended
learning environment?
Is there sufficient professional development for teachers to understand the
potential that blended learning offers?
Is there sufficient expertise and collegiality amongst educators to design and
deliver online curriculum?
Is co-teaching/team teaching well entrenched to allow more risk taking, and
sharing of skill sets?
How do teachers change assessment to align to new learning approaches
and skill acquisition?
How can blended learning practice be made more sustainable and effective?
8.3 Considerations for Students

Are the students equipped with new literacies to support safe and responsible
use of technologies, collaboration beyond the classroom walls and
synthesising information from wider-ranging repositories to learn effectively in
an online/collaborative learning environment?
8.4 Technology Considerations

Is there adequate access to technology and technical support in (and beyond)
the classroom?
What technologies would maximise particular skills sets? What potential risk
and opportunities do they present?
Where to next? For example, gaming, social media, virtual classrooms, and
virtual worlds?
35
9.
List of Schools
Podcasting in the classroom (2006)

Wanganui Park Secondary College
Robotics for Rural (2008)

Airly Primary School
Bundalaguah Primary School
Cobains Primary School
Cowwarr Primary School
Loch Sport Primary School
Nambrok-Denison Primary School
Seaspray Primary School
Wurruk Primary School
Improving Literacy in ESL/VCAL Students Undertaking Workplace

Learning (2009)
North Geelong Secondary College
Hiragana, iPods and Japanese Character Recognition (2009)

Derrinallum P-12 School
Ping (2009)
Balmoral Secondary College
Casterton Secondary College
Hawkesdale P-12 College
Heywood and District Secondary College
Creating Links with the Bayside Community (2010)

Sandringham College
Sharing My Voice (2010)

Eltham High School
Victorian Virtual Learning Network (2008-2010)

Bendigo Senior Secondary College
Boort Secondary College
Charlton P12 College
Donald High School
Hopetoun Secondary College
St Arnaud Secondary College
Wedderburn P12 College
Wycheproof P12 College
List of Schools
36
Wimmera Rural and Remote Project (2008-2010)

Balmoral Community College
Beaufort Secondary College
Birchip P-12 School
Dimboola Memorial Secondary College
Edenhope College
Goroke P-12 College
Hopetoun Secondary College
Horsham College
Kaniva College
Lake Bolac College
Mount Clear Secondary College
Rainbow Secondary College
Chinese Language Learning Web 2.0 (2009)

Doncaster Gardens Primary School
Doncaster Primary School
Horsham Secondary College
Keysborough Secondary College
Floating Worlds Project (Phase 2) (2009)

Amsleigh Park Primary School
Balmoral P-12 College
Birchip P-12 School
Brighton Beach Primary School
Collingwood College
Dimboola Memorial College
Elwood College
Fitzroy High School
Frankston High School
Geelong High School
Maroondah Secondary College
Mt Beauty Secondary College
Mt Clear College
Nungurner Primary School
Princes Hill Primary School
Richmond West Primary School
Sydenham-Hillside Primary School
Toora Primary School
Wooranna Park Primary School
37
Rural Kids Connected (2010)

Nyah District Primary School
Ultima Primary School
Woorinen District Primary School

Grasmere Primary School
Nullawarre and District Primary School
Panmure Primary School
Using Web 2.0 for Indonesian in the Campaspe Network (2010)

Nanneella Estate Primary School
Rochester Primary School
Rochester Secondary College
Comparing Ecosystems (2010)

Bona Vista Primary School
Bruthen Primary School
Woodside Primary School
Overcoming ICT Barrier in the Seven Hills Cluster (2010)

Hepburn Primary School
Invermay Primary School
Mt Blowhard Primary School
Stories from around the Campfire Project (2010)

Langley Primary School
Newham Primary School
Tylden Primary School
VCE e-biology project (2011)

Camperdown College
Corryong College
East Loddon College
Heywood and District Secondary College
Swifts Creek School
Warracknabeal Secondary College
Werrimul College
Wycheproof College
List of Schools
38
References
Alonso Daz, L., & Blzquez Entonado, F. (2009). Are the Functions of
Teachers in e-Learning and Face-to-Face Learning Environments Really
Different? Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 331343.
Australian National Training Authority (2003) Blended Learning: learning

new skills in blending. Sydney: Australian National Training Authority.
Bonk C. and Graham C. (2006) Handbook of Blended Learning. JosseyBass Inc. U.S.A.
Brennan, R. (2003). One size doesn't fit all -: The pedagogy of online
delivery in Australia. In H. Guthrie (Ed.), Online learning: Research
readings (pp. 55-70). Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational Education.
Wikibooks (2009) Issues in digital technology in education: Blended learning

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Issues_in_Digital_Technology_in_Education/Ble
nded_Learning
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (2010)

Teaching and learning with Web 2.0 technologies.
http://www.education.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/teachlearn/innovation/tech
nology/web2report.pdf
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (2011) Victoria

as a Learning Community Extended special lecture Melbourne Graduate
School of Education. Melbourne. November 2011.
http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/commrel/about/learningcom
muityspeech29NOV.pdf
Downes, S. (2008). The Future of Online Learning: Ten Years On. In

Downes, S., Half an Hour, Sunday, November 16, 2008. Moncton: Stephen
Downes. Retrieved November 17, 2008 from
http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2008/11/future-of-online-learning-ten-yearson_16.html
Dziuban C., Hartman J. and Moskal P. (2004)Blended Learning

EDUCAUSE, vol 2004, issue 7
http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0407.pdf
Garrison R and Vaughan N (2007) Blended Learning in Higher Education:

Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. Wiley & Sons, 272pp.
Holkner B., Romeo G., Henderson M., Auld G., Russell G. And Seah W.,
Fernando A. (2008) Exemplar Schools: Using Innovative Learning
Technologies Department of Education, Employment and Workplace
Relations Report
www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/.../exemplar_schools_report_pdf.pdf
International Association for K-12 Online Learning (2008) Blended Learning:

The Convergence of Online and Face-to-Face Education,
http://www.inacol.org/research/promisingpractices/NACOL_PPBlendedLearning-lr.pdf
Idaho Digital Learning Professional Development , Idahopd.org (2009)

Challenges of blended learning
https://sites.google.com/a/idahopd.org/blended-learning/challenges
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs

(2008) Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians,
MCEETYA, Australia.
Oliver M. & Tingwell K. (2003) Can Blended Learning Be Redeemed?

(elearning, vol 2) http://www.luispitta.com/mie/Blended_Learning_2005.pdf
39
Singh H. (2003) Building Effective Blended Learning Programs.

Educational Technology, Volume 43, Number 6, Pages 51-54.
http://asianvu.com/bookstoread/framework/blended-learning.pdf
Stacey, E., Mackey, J. (2009) Researching blended learning practices for

teachers' professional learning. Taipei, Taiwan: Quality Education
Symposium 2009: Education and Research, 12-13 Jun 2009.
Tasmanian Department of Education sSchool (2011) website http://education.tas.edu.au/tasmanianeschool/Pages/Home.aspx
References
40

Blendedlearning

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Blendedlearning

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Blendedlearning

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Blended learning

An educational institution situated in Australia which is not conducted

What is Blended Learning?

2.1 Blended Learning Defined

2.2 Blended Learning Defined in the Victorian Context

2.3 Blended Learning Defined in a National and International

What does blended learning look like?

3.1 Blended Learning Formats

3.2 Designing Blended Learning Activities

3.4 Is Blended Learning for Everybody?