Paclik v. Urquiaga-Paclik - Document No. 10
Paclik v. Urquiaga-Paclik - Document No. 10
Paclik v. Urquiaga-Paclik - Document No. 10
10
Case 3:07-cv-00294-DRH-CJP Document 10 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
HERNDON, District Judge:
Amended Petition for Intervention.” (Doc. 9.) The Court understands this document
filed after a party has filed a motion to supplement pleadings and the Court has
granted such motion. Since Plaintiff filed the “Update to Amended Petition for
Intervention” (Doc. 9) without leave from the Court, the Court STRIKES the
document. If Plaintiff wishes to refile the supplement, Plaintiff should first file a
motion for leave to file a supplement and wait for the Court’s ruling before
proceeding. The motion should explain why such a supplement is necessary. In the
future, Plaintiff is also directed to closely abide by all of the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
Plaintiff is advised that he may not contact chambers counsel to discuss the specifics
Page 1 of 2
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:07-cv-00294-DRH-CJP Document 10 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
of this case. Plaintiff may only contact chambers if he has a general procedural
question; even then, Plaintiff should understand that chambers counsel may not
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Page 2 of 2