Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 181 views

    Ronald Did Not Raped Julia Arguments in Favor For Ronald Arguments Against Ronald

    Uploaded by

    Ralph Mark Joseph
    Ronald was accused of raping Julia on the night of a wedding party. Arguments in favor of Ronald included that Julia and Ronald had agreed to be intimate the night before, they had been in a relationship for two months prior, and the medical examiner found no signs of struggle. Arguments against Ronald included Julia's testimony that Ronald raped her and that she struggled but was threatened with a knife. The document analyzed the arguments on both sides and concluded that due to inconsistencies in Julia's statements, Ronald should be acquitted of the rape charge.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ronald Did Not Raped Julia Arguments in Favor For Ronald Arguments Against Ronald

    Uploaded by

    Ralph Mark Joseph
    181 views2 pages
    Ronald was accused of raping Julia on the night of a wedding party. Arguments in favor of Ronald included that Julia and Ronald had agreed to be intimate the night before, they had been in a relationship for two months prior, and the medical examiner found no signs of struggle. Arguments against Ronald included Julia's testimony that Ronald raped her and that she struggled but was threatened with a knife. The document analyzed the arguments on both sides and concluded that due to inconsistencies in Julia's statements, Ronald should be acquitted of the rape charge.

    Original Description:

    SCHOOL

    Original Title

    Iya Bitara

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Ronald was accused of raping Julia on the night of a wedding party. Arguments in favor of Ronald included that Julia and Ronald had agreed to be intimate the night before, they had been in a relationship for two months prior, and the medical examiner found no signs of struggle. Arguments against Ronald included Julia's testimony that Ronald raped her and that she struggled but was threatened with a knife. The document analyzed the arguments on both sides and concluded that due to inconsistencies in Julia's statements, Ronald should be acquitted of the rape charge.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    181 views2 pages

    Ronald Did Not Raped Julia Arguments in Favor For Ronald Arguments Against Ronald

    Uploaded by

    Ralph Mark Joseph
    Ronald was accused of raping Julia on the night of a wedding party. Arguments in favor of Ronald included that Julia and Ronald had agreed to be intimate the night before, they had been in a relationship for two months prior, and the medical examiner found no signs of struggle. Arguments against Ronald included Julia's testimony that Ronald raped her and that she struggled but was threatened with a knife. The document analyzed the arguments on both sides and concluded that due to inconsistencies in Julia's statements, Ronald should be acquitted of the rape charge.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    RONALD DID NOT RAPED JULIA

    ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR FOR RONALD


    1. The night after the wedding party
    Julia and Ronald agreed to make
    love.
    2. Ronald and Julia were sweethearts
    2 months prior to the rape incident.
    3. According to the medical examiner
    there were no sign that may
    indicate a struggle and being
    wrestled on the rough and dry
    ground.
    4. The medical examiner found
    lacerations suggesting that Julia is
    still a virgin prior to the incident.
    5. Julia called Ronald the following
    day insisting that he should marry
    her because she might get
    pregnant.
    6. To make amends, Ronald
    convinced Julia to walk her home
    and sit in a piece of log near the
    house of Mario were the romantic
    activity happened.
    7. Julia became angry at Ronald
    during the wedding because of the
    jokes made by the latters friends
    that lead to the walking out of the
    former out of the party alone.
    8. Mario stated that he did not here
    any outcry near his house and
    mentioned that its a full moon and it
    shines brightly.
    Conclusion:

    ARGUMENTS AGAINST RONALD


    1. Julia testified that Ronald raped the
    night of June 12 at the wedding
    party.
    2. Julia testified that Ronald is still a
    suitor not her boyfriend.
    3. Julia stated that she struggled to
    get free but because of the knife
    pointed at her she remained silent.

    4. Its likely to have vaginal lacerations


    during the first sexual intercourse.
    5. Julia kept the incident for herself
    because her parents might to
    something bad to her.
    6. Julia walked across the farm near
    marios house because it is a
    shortcut to their house.

    7. When Julia was walking home


    alone, Ronald caught her arm and
    wrestled her to the ground near the
    House of Mario.
    8. She mentioned that the incident
    happened in a jagged and difficult
    path.

    According on the arguments stated above, Ronald Galang should and must be
    acquitted of the charge of rape by Julia because of the inconsistencies of the statement
    made by the victim on the alleged rape incident.
    PREPARED BY: Dianne Grace Bitara

    You might also like