WACKER Et Al v. Sun Prairie Area School District Et Al - Document No. 4

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

WACKER et al v. Sun Prairie Area School District et al Doc.

4
Case: 3:07-cv-00611-bbc Document #: 4 Filed: 10/30/2007 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

DAWN J. WACKER, mother and


natural guardian of Spencer L. Houk,,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
07-C-611-C
v.

SUN PRAIRIE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT and


JIM McCLOWRY, Athletic & Activities Director,

Defendants.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

This civil action was removed from the Circuit Court for Dane County to federal

court by defendants Sun Prairie Area School District and Jim McClowry and set for hearing

on plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction on October 26, 2007 before United States

District Judge Barbara B. Crabb. David Lasker appeared for plaintiff, who was also present

in person. Dave Rohrer and Joanne Harmon Curry appeared for defendants.

At the outset of the hearing, Mr. Lasker informed the court and opposing counsel that

he did not believe that removal was proper. Plaintiff had alleged a violation of her son’s

“constitutional right to due process” without specifying whether the claim arose under state

or federal constitution. Mr. Lasker stated that it was plaintiff’s intent to proceed only on

Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 3:07-cv-00611-bbc Document #: 4 Filed: 10/30/2007 Page 2 of 2

a state constitutional claim. Mr. Rohrer noted his surprise that Mr. Lasker had not informed

him earlier that plaintiff was not raising a federal claim and that had Mr. Lasker done so

either orally or by making it plain in the complaint, defendants would not have removed the

case to federal court. Mr. Rohrer conceded that if plaintiff was raising only a state

constitutional issue, defendants had no ground on which to move for removal and could not

oppose remand of the case.

In light of plaintiff’s clarification of her constitutional claim, I find that no federal

question is involved in this case. Accordingly, it is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for

Dane County, Wisconsin.

Entered this 30th day of October, 2007.

BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge

You might also like