Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 122 views

    Gap Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Sajal Jain
    A gap analysis was conducted at Station X thermal power station to evaluate technical constraints and deficiencies. Preliminary data analysis found the station performed below norms in 2008-09 with generation 5031 MUs below the target of 7624.8 MUs, resulting in fixed cost losses of Rs. 33.33 Cr. Auxiliary power consumption and heat rate were higher than norms, resulting in additional coal consumption and energy losses. NTPC experts visited to conduct a systems approach gap analysis to identify reasons for underperformance and propose solutions to bridge performance gaps.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Gap Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Sajal Jain
    122 views30 pages
    A gap analysis was conducted at Station X thermal power station to evaluate technical constraints and deficiencies. Preliminary data analysis found the station performed below norms in 2008-09 with generation 5031 MUs below the target of 7624.8 MUs, resulting in fixed cost losses of Rs. 33.33 Cr. Auxiliary power consumption and heat rate were higher than norms, resulting in additional coal consumption and energy losses. NTPC experts visited to conduct a systems approach gap analysis to identify reasons for underperformance and propose solutions to bridge performance gaps.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    A gap analysis was conducted at Station X thermal power station to evaluate technical constraints and deficiencies. Preliminary data analysis found the station performed below norms in 2008-09 with generation 5031 MUs below the target of 7624.8 MUs, resulting in fixed cost losses of Rs. 33.33 Cr. Auxiliary power consumption and heat rate were higher than norms, resulting in additional coal consumption and energy losses. NTPC experts visited to conduct a systems approach gap analysis to identify reasons for underperformance and propose solutions to bridge performance gaps.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    122 views30 pages

    Gap Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Sajal Jain
    A gap analysis was conducted at Station X thermal power station to evaluate technical constraints and deficiencies. Preliminary data analysis found the station performed below norms in 2008-09 with generation 5031 MUs below the target of 7624.8 MUs, resulting in fixed cost losses of Rs. 33.33 Cr. Auxiliary power consumption and heat rate were higher than norms, resulting in additional coal consumption and energy losses. NTPC experts visited to conduct a systems approach gap analysis to identify reasons for underperformance and propose solutions to bridge performance gaps.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 30
    At a glance
    Powered by AI
    The document discusses gap analysis methodology to assess technical issues in power stations and propose solutions. It provides an example analysis of losses incurred by Station X in 2008-09 and emphasizes a systems approach with committed manpower as key to success.

    Gap analysis is a methodology to assess technical constraints and systems deficiency in client stations to propose future course of action for excellence. It involves steps like presenting findings to executives and providing an overview to identify gaps.

    According to the data presented, Station X incurred losses in 2008-09 such as fixed cost lost of Rs. 33.33 Cr, extra coal consumed of Rs. 66.16 Cr, direct energy loss of Rs. 1.04 Cr, among others due to not meeting norms for parameters like generation, PLF, heat rate and auxiliary consumption.

    GAP ANALYSIS

    OBSOLESCENCE TO EXCELLENCE
    What is Gap Analysis

    A methodology to assess technical constraints and


    systems deficiency in client stations to propose
    future course of action for excellence.
    Steps in Gap Analysis
    Presentation to Sr. Executives of SEBs
    NTPC-An Overview

    Loss
    Turn Around capabilityExperience incurred
    with PIE by utility w.r.t. to S
    Station ‘X’ Thermal Power Station,

    Description MPERC Norms Actual Profit/Loss


    08-09 08-09

    Generation MUs 7624.8 5031.3 Fixed Cost lost


    Rs.33.33 Cr
    DC Availability % 77.0 68.46
    PLF% 77 68.42 No incentive

    Heat Rate kcal/Kwh 2757 3136 Extra coal consumed


    Rs 66.16 Cr

    Aux Power Consumption % 9.22 9.28 Direct Energy Loss


    Rs 1.04 Cr

    Sp Oil Consumption 2 1.23 Saving


    ml/Kwh Rs 12.47 Cr
    Losses During the Financial Year 2008-09
    Preliminary Data Analysis
    Preliminary Data Analysis

    Partial Loading%
    Preliminary Data Analysis
    Preliminary Data Analysis

    ONTHS

    No. of OH
    Visit by NTPC Experts
    SYSTEM APPROACH
    SYSTEMS APPROACH
    IS THE KEY FOR SUCCESS
    SYSTEMS APPROACH
    WITH
    COMMITTED MANPOWER
    IS THE KEY FOR SUCCESS
    COMMITED MANPOWER
    COMMITED MANPOWER
    COMMITED MANPOWER
    PIE Experience

    Best Best
    Best in in
    in 20 10
    30 Years Years
    Best
    Years in
    28Year
    s
    PIE Experience
    PIE Experience

    Gap Analysis Gap Analysis


    13786 MUs 13786 MUs

    PIE 3845 MUs


    BRIDGEING THE GAP

    Partnership
    GAP ANALYSIS
    in excellence
    7.5
    37 MUs
    MUs
    per day
    50 Lakhs
    225 Lakhs
    people every day.
    .
    Silver Lining – Environment Care
    ESP, Khaperkheda

    .
    Silver Lining – Environment
    Care
    FOPH, Koradi
    .
    Silver Lining – Environment Care
    Greenery, Khaperkheda

    .
    Silver Lining – Scrap
    Management
    Boiler Zero meter, Koradi
    .
    Silver Lining – Creativity
    Shaktiman, Nasik

    .
    Preliminary data and its
    analysis

    Data is analysed before the visit for


    knowing performance of utility.
    Typical example
     PLF % -vis-a vis partial loading &
    Availabilty
    Avalaibilty
    FO%
     BTL% vs other trip
     Both number wise and % of FO
     Mean time to BTL repair
     MTTR
     MTBF
     BTL down time & revenue loss
     PO
     Gap between OH
     Duration of OH
     BTL & other trip within 2 months of OH
     Partial Loading
     Unit wise, Stationwise
     Evaluation of Reasons.
     Base work for site visit and area to be
    concentrated during the visit.

    You might also like