I Cube
I Cube
I Cube
Table of contents
Details Page number
Objectives of the report 4
Introduction 5
Glossary of terms used 7
Internet growth in India 9
Urban Internet users : Year 2009 10
Growing urban Internet population 11
Internet services reaching far and wide 12
Pervasive Internet penetration 13
Youth driving the Internet usage 14
Internet Access Points 15
Internet users exploring different medium of accessing Internet 16
3
Table of contents
Details Page number
Important Internet Applications 17
Various purposes of accessing Internet 18
Preference of online services across demographic segments 19
Internet is gradually becoming a routine for users 20
Internet gaining acceptance in daily lives 21
Annexure: Study Methodology & Sampling procedure 22
Target segment and city selection 23
Sampling procedure 24
Face‐to‐Face interview procedure 25
Sample size of households & individuals covered for profiling 26
4
Objectives of the report
This report is a part of a syndicated study conducted annually by eTech Group | IMRB
International in association with Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI)
The report aims to map the growth and the characteristics of Internet usage in India
It details out the usage of Internet in India among different demographics and geographic
segments over a period of time
It reflects on various applications and services used over the Internet through various points
of access
Internet in India (I‐Cube) reports are based on a primary survey conducted
Across 31 cities
Among 19,000 Households and 68,000 individuals
1000 SMEs and
500 Cyber Cafes
This extensive exercise makes the study one of the largest research in the Internet domain in
India.
5
Introduction
There has been a steady growth of Internet adoption in India. The penetration
rates, however, continue to be low at 24% of the total urban individuals
The Internet has reached the remote urban pockets (small metros and towns) and
is being actively used by lower socio‐economic classes (SEC C, D &E). This
development has been more striking this year as the combined usage of these
geographies and classes have overtaken top cities and higher socio‐economic
classes in numbers
In these developments, however, youth continue to drive the surge in Internet use
and form major portion of the total users. Among youths, the Internet is primarily
being used for searching general information and for entertainment
While the traditional avenue (Cyber Café) in accessing Internet continue to remain
strong, a definite pattern of using online services through mobile phones and
kiosks is emerging
6
Introduction
Internet is increasingly being used for entertainment purposes – including
downloading music or videos, socializing through social networking sites
(Facebook, Orkut) and expressing one’s own opinions and views through
micro‐blogging (Twitter) and user‐generated content (Wikipedia, Video
and photo sharing) sites
Even celebrities and politicians have chosen blogging sites to stay in touch
with their fans and air their views
With release of more such kinds of services in the offing like Google Buzz,
interesting pattern of usage could occur in the coming years
Further, given the limited options for speed and bandwidth limits, the
industry is eagerly awaiting the 3G auctions by the regulators. With
improved options, Internet usage is bound to change towards further
progressive growth
7
Glossary of terms used
Active User : An individual who has used the Internet at least once in the last 1 month.
Internet Non‐Owner : An individual who belongs to a household which does not own an Internet connection.
Internet Non‐User : An individual who has not accessed Internet at any point in time.
PC Literate : An individual who knows how to use a PC. While this term does not signify the extent of PC usage, it means that a
computer literate is able to work on a PC without assistance.
Socio‐Economic Classification (SEC)
A classification that indicates the affluence level of a household to which an individual belongs. SEC is defined by the education and
occupation of the chief wage earner (CWE) of a household. SEC is divided into 8 categories ‐ A1, A2, B1, B2, C, D, E1, and E2 (in
decreasing order of affluence).
8
Glossary of terms used
Geographic
Segment
9
Internet Growth in
India
10
Urban Internet users: Year 2009
Total Population ~ 818 Mn*
Urban Population ~ 266 Mn*
Urban Literate Population ~ 217 Mn*
Total English Knowing ~ 91 Mn*
Total Computer Literate ~ 87 Mn
March 2009
Urban
Claimed Internet users ~63 Mn
Active Internet Users ~46 Mn
September 2009 (Est.)
*Source: NRS 2006
Urban (Population with 12 years of age and above)
Claimed Internet users ~71 Mn
Active Internet Users~ 52 Mn
Nearly 25% of Indian population stay in cities. Out of which, 32% of them are PC Literate. Of the PC
Literate population, 72% claim to have used Internet. Of these claimed users, 73% are actively using
Internet (have used Internet in past 1 month). The penetration of Internet usage is low at 24% (Claimed
Internet Users/ Urban Population) among urban individuals.
11
Growing urban Internet population
Base : All India (Urban)
(All figures in Million)
PC Users have increased from 72 Mn in 2008 to 87 Mn in 2009.
The reason can be attributed to penetration of PCs in smaller
towns and lower SEC classes.
With increasing affluence and literacy levels, people are gradually
getting acquainted to the third screen.
(est.)
Claimed Internet users increased by 26% from March 2008. This
growth is higher than what has been witnessed in the past years.
Internet services reaching far and wide
Base: All India Internet Ever Users (Urban)
(All figures in Million)
From 5% in 2000 to 36% in 2009,
Internet has surely made an impact
in lives of small town.
The presence of the Internet is widespread, however, given the limited numbers it falls short of
being an all‐inclusive medium.
13
Pervasive Internet penetration
Base: All India Internet Ever Users (Urban)
Internet is gradually (All figures in Million)
penetrating among lower SEC
classes. SEC C, D and E
combined together account 5 Mn 9 Mn 12 Mn 16 Mn 32 Mn 46 Mn 50 Mn 63 Mn
for 35% of the Internet user
population which is more
than SEC A ‐ an encouraging
sign towards wider adoption
of this medium. The share of
SEC B has remained constant
over the years.
Youth driving the Internet usage
Base: Active Internet User(Urban)
2009:31 Cities
School and college students 2008:30 Cities
2006: 26 Cities
contribute 44% of the internet usage. 2004 :22 Cities
2000‐2003 :16 Cities
Along with young men, they account
for 72% of Internet usage.
Internet Access
Points
16
Internet users exploring different medium of accessing Internet
Base: Active Internet User(Urban)
2009: 31 Cities, 2008: 30 Cities, 2006: 26 Cities,
2004: 22 Cities, 2000‐2003 :16 Cities
This also indicates that although the
number of cyber cafes have shrunk
in Metros, users in small towns still
access Internet mainly through this
public avenue. As more businesses
adopt Internet as their key
infrastructure, accessing Internet
through offices continue to rise.
This year an interesting pattern has emerged with 4% of users accessing this medium through
alternative sources such as Mobiles and Kiosks. In future such access is largely dependent upon the
telecom regulation and environment in the country.
17
Important Internet
Applications
18
Various purposes of accessing Internet
2008 2009
91
76
49
32
46
37
41
21
21
13
Base: Active Internet User(Urban)
2009:31 Cities
13 2008:30 Cities
20
Preference of online services across demographic segments
Base: Active Internet
User(Urban)
2009:31 Cities
Overall, there has been a 2008:30 Cities
2006: 26 Cities
gradual shift in preference of 2004 :22 Cities
2000‐2003 :16 Cities
online services across
demographic segments. Email 21.6 Mn 3 Mn 6.58 Mn 6.12 Mn 2.71 Mn 1.77 Mn 1.42 Mn
service has gone down in all
the segments.
Internet is gradually becoming a routine for users
Base: Active Internet User(Urban)
2009:31 Cities
Almost half of the Internet 2008:30 Cities
2006: 26 Cities
users are online at least 4‐6 2004 :22 Cities
2000‐2003 :16 Cities
times/week.
1.4 Mn 3.1 Mn 4.9 Mn 7.5 Mn 13.2 Mn 15.4 Mn 17.4 Mn 21.6 Mn
Internet plays an integral
role in daily life. Ranging
from communication to
shopping, a huge gamut of
activities are just a click
away. This has led to
increased frequency of
Internet usage among
Internet users.
Internet gaining acceptance in daily lives
Internet offers lots of services to people to carry out
their day‐to‐day activities that entice users to devote
more time to the medium, leading to increase in
time spent on the Internet.
Base: Active Internet User(Urban)
2009:31 Cities
Primarily, ease of communication and obtaining 2008:30 Cities
2006: 26 Cities
information on wide‐ranging aspects are compelling 2004 :22 Cities
users to hook onto the Internet. Downloading 2000‐2003 :16 Cities
With rising usage pattern, in the near future it will be interesting to see how Internet as a media
emerges in comparison with Television and Radio.
Annexure :
Study Methodology &
Sampling Procedure
22
23
Target segment and city selection
For sampling purposes, we extensively used the previous rounds of the I‐Cube
reports that have laid down the universe of the Claimed and Active Internet Users
in the country
Census of India 2001 indicates that there are 35 Cities with more than 1 Million
population in India. In this round of survey, we have covered all the top 8 Metros
as well as other 23 cities
Below are the cities that have been covered in this research:
Cities by Strata
Top 4 Metros Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai & Kolkata
Other 4 Metros Bangalore, Hyderabad, Ahmedabad & Pune
Small Metro Patna, Cochin, Baroda, Lucknow, Ludhiana, Coimbatore,
(More than 1 Million Pop.) Jaipur, Indore, Surat, Nagpur, Bhopal, Vishakapatnam,
Faridabad
Non Metro Guwahati, Bhubaneshwar, Raipur, Chandigarh
(Between 0.5 to 1 Million Pop.)
Small Town Kolhapur, Bellary, Thrissur, Panipat, Gurgaon, Noida
(Less than 0.5 Million Pop.)
24
Sampling procedure
Quota sampling procedure was followed to cover households belonging to SEC A,
B and C category in each of the 31 cities short‐listed and SEC A, B, C, D & E in each
of the top 8 metros
Selection of households was made based on random starting addresses identified
from electoral rolls
Care was taken to ensure even geographical spread in identifying the starting
addresses across the cities selected
Based on this household survey, we managed to profile individuals in terms of age,
gender, occupation, education, computer knowledge & Internet use
From all the individuals in household, we asked the question
Whether they have used PC
Whether they have used Internet ever
Whether they have accessed Internet in last one month.
We identified those saying “Yes” to all the above as an Active Internet User. These
Active Internet Users were administered the detailed interviews for Internet Usage
25
Face‐to‐Face interview procedure
LISTING QUESTIONNAIRE
DETAILED INTERVIEW
Knows PC Knows PC
Does not Know PC Knows PC + +
Accessed Internet Ever Accessed Internet in last
one month
Sample size of households & individuals covered for profiling
Cities Households Individuals Cities Households Individuals
Mumbai 1090 4230 Surat 513 1886
Top 4 Delhi 1096 4031
Nagpur 519 1990
Metros Kolkata Small
1212 4263
Bhopal 516 2033 Metro
Chennai 1078 3748
Vishakapatnam 512 1712
Bangalore 932 3241
Hyderabad 926 3462 Guwahati 500 1731
Other 4
Metros Ahmedabad Raipur 500 2023 Non
904 3171
Bhubaneswar 499 1752 Metro
Pune 850 3135
Patna 513 2187 Chandigarh 507 1712
Balendu Shrivastava
Group Business Director,
eTech Group|IMRB
IMRB International
‘A’ Wing, Mhatre Pen Building
Senapati Bapat Marg, Mumbai
Tel : (91)‐22‐24233902
Fax: (91)‐22‐24323800
Email: [email protected]