The Nomonhan Incident Imperial Japan and The Soviet Union
The Nomonhan Incident Imperial Japan and The Soviet Union
The Nomonhan Incident Imperial Japan and The Soviet Union
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sophia. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Sophia University is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Monumenta
Nipponica.
http://www.jstor.org
The Nomonhan Incident
IMPERIAL JAPAN AND THE
SOVIET UNION
by KATSU H. YOUNG
(I INTRODUCTION
MTHE AUTHOR is currently completing her disserta- t A, Tokyo, I950-5i and I956, V, 44; "Kanto-
tion at the University of Washington. It is tenta- gun no nimmu ni motozuku taigai shomondai ni
tively entitled "TheJapanese Army and the Soviet kansuru gun no iken" A*_ f- ) * I < 13'11
-
Union, I936-4I." This article is a portion of that # - - v M 7 69* I J ,(The KwantungArmy's
dissertation. She wishes to acknowledge with Opinion on the Various Problemsof Foreign Rela-
gratitude a grant (the Shirley Farr Fellowship) tions from the Point of View of the Duties of the
from the American Association of University Army), in Nihongaikonempyo narabini shuyobunsho
Women which supported her researchduring the Ei
*t*+ A-)- X t (Chronological Tables
year i965-66. and Major Documents Pertaining to Japan's For-
1 4E,a/Ji e
A W eign Relations), Gaimush6 S1*d- , ed., 2 vols.,
2Harada Kumao , eAi' it4, Jutsu d& Saionjikd Nihon kokusai reng6ky6kai El4I1I 14,
to seikyokux5 F Z & (Prince Saionji and the Tokyo, I955, II, 330-335.
Political Situation), 9 vols., Iwanami shoten M it
YOUNG. "The NomonhanIncident" 83
12 T-779, Reel I09, FramesI87I7-I97I9, Manso of this note constitutesthe item numberof this
kokkydkannokakushu ken-A V @g
shogaijikenni kansuru source in the Checklist. Sourcescited from this
; / - P"4 @ ---J- M A )/f+t (DocumentCon- documentarycollectionwill be givenin the above
cerning Various Violations of the Manchukuoan- formwhenthey areincludedforthe firsttime.
Soviet Border), June i6, I938, from the Acting 13 An affidavitdated February22, I946, from
Chief of Staff of the Kwantung Army to the Vice- Major-GeneralAkikusa Shun {kX &PA4t, in
Minister of War, Manji dainikki(mitsu) ;A k aW IMTFE,Transcript, p. 78I6, andIMTFE,Sokkiroku,
t&(t), 34 volumes, I938, xiv, No. 29, U.S. No.go, p. I7.
National Archives No. I6046. The above is one *14 The Japanesetroops suffered450 dead and
of the items included in John Young (comp.), goo wounded, while the Soviet casualtieswere
of SelectedArchives I,200 dead, 2,000 seriouslywounded,and 2,200
of MicroftlmReproductions
Checklist
of the 7apaneseArmy, Navy, and OtherGovernment slightlywounded,accordingto oneJapanese source.
Agencies,I868-I945, Georgetown University Press, SeeJFOA,SP4, p. 38I.
Washington D.C., I959. The number at the head
86 MonumentaNipponica,xXu, I-2
with modernmechanizedarmsin orderto be able to match the Red Armyin the future.16
The year I938 was slipping away as the China campaigncontinued rolling on with
little hope of an end. At home the Japanesegovernmentwaspainfullytornoverthe issueof
strengtheningtreatyrelationswith GermanyandItaly.The leadersofthe KonoeCabinethad
agreedthat an anti-Sovietmilitaryalliancewith thosepowers-as an extensionof the Anti-
CominternPact-would be conduciveto a speedyand favorabledisposalof the ChinaInci-
dent. It was felt that such treatyrelationswould alleviatethe Soviet threatfromthe north,
therebyallowingJapanto shift a part of the KwantungArmy fromManchukuoto the mil-
itarytheaterin China.17Whenit was discoveredthat the Germansdesireda generalmilitary
alliancedirectedagainstotherunspecifiedpowersin additionto the Soviet Union, the army
quickly expressedits willingness to accept this proposal.The civilian leaders and the
navy, on the otherhand,steadfastlyopposedit, insistingthat the new treatycould have no
othernationthanthe SovietUnionasits object.Unableeitherto concludethe ChinaIncident
or resolvethe disagreementover the proposedalliance,the KonoeCabinetresignedenbloc,
and the new year witnessed the birth of a cabinetheadedby BaronHiranumaKiichir5.18
During the tenure of the HiranumaCabinetover seventy sessionsof the Five Ministers'
Conference(the Prime Minister, and the Ministers of War, Navy, Foreign Affairs,and
Finance)were held in a seven-monthperiod. These constant meetings were an effort to
settle the disagreementsinheritedfrom the Konoe governmentrespectingthe proposed
alliance.War Minister Itagaki Seishirocontinued to insist that the Germanproposalbe
accepted,andwas sharplyopposedby the Foreignand Navy Ministers,Arita Hachiraand
Yonai Mitsumasa,19respectively.(All three of these ministers retained their portfolios
when the changeof cabinettook place.)GermanyannexedCzechoslovakiain March,I939,
therebygreatlyintensifyingthe antagonismbetweenthe Axisandthe westernpowers,aswell
as the apprehensionsof the opponentsof an Axis alliancewithinJapan.Within the context
of suchinternationaldevelopmentsthe problemof the proposedalliancewas becomingever
moredifficultto resolve.The army beganto busy itself with activities calculatedto bring
about the early conclusionof the alliance.It employedvariousrightist groups to stir up
publicopinionduringthe T'ientsinIncident(a consequenceofJapanesemilitaryoperations
in China), and variousManchukuoanborderdisputeswere prominentlypublicized.20All
this was intendedto makepublicopinionfavorableto the Axis, andto forcethe government
to concludethe desiredtripartitealliance.Amidsttheseforeignanddomesticcircumstances
the NomonhanIncidenterupted.
(III NOMONHAN
RECORDED violationsof the frontiersof Manchukuowith the Soviet Union and Mongolia
by both Sovietand MongolianforcesgraduallyincreasedfromI937 throughI939. In I937,
also the yearof the Kanch'atzuIncident,theJapanesegovernmentrecordedII3 suchviola-
tions. In I938, the year of the Changkufengaffair,the total numberrose to i66. Finally,in
I939 the numberof violationsreachedits apogee, I95 being recordedby the Japaneseau-
thorities.21The NomonhanIncident,which took place from the late spring through the
autumnof I939, was by far the most large-scaleandseriousof all the borderincidents be-
tweenJapaneseforcesandthe Red Army.Its effecton the viewsof theJapanesemilitarywas
immeasurablyfar-reaching.
In AprilI939, one monthpriorto the outbreakof the NomonhanIncident,the Kwantung
Army authoritiesdevised a documententitled "GeneralPrinciplesin Dealing with Man-
chukuoan-SovietBorderDisputes."22This was transmittedas a directive to the frontier
forcesunderthe commandof the KwantungArmy.It statedthat in obscureareaswhere the
actualdemarcationof the borderwasunclear,the localKwantungArmycommandersin such
areaswereto establishand authorizea line "independently,"and then notify the frontier
forces.Subsequentlythis actionwas to be reportedimmediatelyto the Commanderof the
KwantungArmy.If and when such a borderlinewas violated,the frontierforcein the area
was to chastize the violatorswithout delay. Further, the KwantungArmy Commander
authorizedthe frontierforcesto advanceinto Soviet or Mongolianterritorytemporarily,
if the protectionof the frontieror the chastisementof frontierviolatorsrequiredit. The
frontierforceswereinformedthat in the futurethey wereexpectedto defendthe borderin a
"positive"fashion,andany consequencesderivingfromsuchdefensewouldbe the responsi-
bility of the Commanderof the KwantungArmy.
As alreadynoted,in JuneI938, someten monthspriorto the issuanceof the "principles"
the Vice-Chief of the General Staff, Manju dai nikki 4I, 42, and 43).
YOUNG. "The NomonhanIncident" 91
33 This directive of the Commanderof the attacked Litvinov in the Supreme Soviet, criticiz-
KwantungArmyis to be foundin Gendaishi shiryo, ing his diplomacy as a "soft" line. (At the time of
X, I42 (Document83); forthe text of the proclama- his denunciation of Litvinov, Zhdanov had just
tionissuedby the Commander of the 6thArmy,see been appointed as the first Chairmanof the newly
IMTFE,Sokkiroku, No. 9I, pp. 7-8; and IMTFE, established Standing Committee for Foreign
pp. 7858-7860.Forthe orderof battleof
Transcript, Affairs in the Supreme Soviet.) See William L.
the 6th Army, see Gendaishi shiryo,x, IoS-io6 Langer, ed., An Encyclopediaof World History,
(Document3). Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, I960, revised
34 edition, pp. I036-I037. For a representative Japa-
35 On May3, I939,aftereighteenyearsof serv- nese observation on the change in Soviet policy,
ice as Peoples' Commissarfor Foreign Affairs, see End6 Ichiro 4U- O, "Sorensekishoku gaiko
MaximLitvinovwas suddenlydismissed.Rumors no daitenkan" v t_ L.a1Z o) *U& (The Volte-
of his possible dismissalhad begun as early as face of Red Diplomacy), Gaikojiho, LXXXVI, No. 8oo,
Januaryof I938,whenAndreiZhdanovhadopenly April I, I938, pp. I77-I85.
YOUNG. "The NomonhanIncident" 93
44 Harada,VIII, 226. Pacific War. See Hayashi, pp. 25-26. Some com-
45 JFOA, SP 4, p. 370; and Hayashi, p. 23. manders of the Nomonhan battles chose suicide
46 Some members of the General Staff also were rather than return to Japan as defeated soldiers.
forced to retire. The staff members of the First See Okada Keisuke, OkadaKeisukekaiko-rokuP11a1
(Operations) Section of the Kwantung Army were i44-v7 ijK (Memoirs), Mainichi shimbunsha -X
mostly transferredto other posts. However, before E AMM1,Tokyo, I950, p. I45; and Gendaishishiryo,
long they were again in the most responsibleTokyo X, I48-I49 (DocumentsI02 and I04).
military posts, and many were leaders during the 47
attitude formerly encouragedin the frontier forces was now no longer permitted.48
The NomonhanIncidentalso gave the Japanesemilitaryleadersa basisfor the reevalua-
tion of the relativepower of the Red Army and their own forces.If the ChangkufengIn-
cidentof the previoussummerhadnot taught the military(especiallythe KwantungArmy)
any lesson,the NomonhanIncidentmost certainlydid so.49 It remaineddeeplyengravedin
their thoughtson the futurecourseof the Empirein the internationalscene. Both govern-
mentaland militaryauthoritieswere deeply concernedrespectingthe effectof Nomonhan
on public opinionin both Japanand Manchukuo.In Septemberof I939 one Diet member
observedthat the Japanesedefeatshad a very adverseeffectupon the outlookof the Man-
chukuoanpublic, and that the Manchukuoansoldierywho had witnessed personallythe
superiorpower of the Red Army were now propagatingthis effect to the public at large,
much to the dismayand chagrinof the governmentalauthoritiesin Manchukuo.50
It was the overwhelmingsuperiorityof the Soviet mechanizedforceswhich most im-
pressed the Japanesemilitaryleaders.On October 3, I939, at a Conferenceof Provincial
Governors,War Ministry authoritiesmade public a statementin which they implicitly
acknowledgedthe defeatwhich the Japaneseforceshad suffered.This was a most unusual
event. The statementsaidthat "ourarmycontinuedthe struggleto the death with inferior
forces, and staged repeateddaring offensivesagainst the superiorSoviet and Mongolian
forces,especiallytheir overwhelmingmechanizedtroops, and inflicted heavy losses upon
the enemy." However, the military authoritiescontinued, the recent incident had been
fought with the latest in modernmilitarytechnology,and it had taught them the serious
lessonthat in modernwarfarethe materialaspectof equipmentwas of equal,if not superior,
importanceto the spiritualor mental aspect of militarypreparationand training.51This
appearedto be a basicrevisionof the traditionalviews long heldin Japanesemilitarycircles.
However, the reportscited below, as well as the subsequentPacificWar, show that this
changeof viewpoint was moreapparentthan actual.
Followingthe truce,the StaffOfficeof the KwantungArmyestablishedan "Investigating
Committeefor Researchinto Military Preparations."In late November I939 this organ
completeda reporton the NomonhanIncident.52This was a lengthy document"basedon
48 Hayashi, p. 24. Governors held in Tokyo. See Asahi shimbun,
49 In June of I939 the Emperorremarkedto the October4, I939.
Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal, Yuasa Kurahei WA 52 T-803, Reel I09, Frames I9024-I9127,
kf, that the Japanese Army was not indicating Nomonhanjiken / -E- >" :V 1;% t t
kenkyiibhkoku
that it had learned anything from its experience +- (A Report on the Investigation of the Nomon-
in the Changkufeng Incident a year previously. hanIncident),Gunjikimitsu * * T- (Military
See Harada, VIII,4. Secret),November27, I939, from the Chairman
50 Statement to Harada by Sakurauchi Yukio of the Investigating Committee, Kwantung Army
a Minseit6 Ptt man and former (Kant6gun heibi kenkyiuch6saiinch6 FA.
Minister of Agriculture and Forestry. Harada, ;%fl;A 4X A ), to the Vice-Minister of War,
viiI, 89-go. Riku mankimitsudai nikkia k. Q X I, 1940,
51 Statement of the War Ministry authorities No. 42, U.S. National Archives No. I4550.
on October 3, I939, at a Conferenceof Provincial
YOUNG. "The NomonhanIncident" 99
53 T-803, Reel I09, Frame I9029. 54 Ibid.,Frame I9I09; and Hayashi, p. 24.
IOO MonumentaNipponica,xX, I-2
with whichit hadlong beenpreoccupied:the SouthSeas.This was the latest productof the
ever-dominantinteractionof anxietyand opportunism.
Thus the Japanese-Soviet NeutralityPact survivedthe summerof I94I -if only because
therewas apparentlyno favorableopportunityto breakit. However,even afterthe plan to
attackthe SovietUnionwas abandoned,theJapaneseforcesfacingthe Bolshevikstate were
never substantiallydecreased,and a continuouseffortwas made to equip themwith ever
better and more modernequipment. The military facilities of Korea and Manchukuo,
such as railways,armories,and militarybases were continuallyimprovedand expanded.
This was true even at the heightof the PacificWar,whenJapanwas ever more desperately
in need of increasedmilitaryforcesand materielin the SouthSeastheaterof war.59
Priorto andduringthe periodwith which we have beenconcernedthe army'straditional
fearof and hostility towardthe Soviet Union was unalterable.The Bolshevikneighborwas
alwayslookeduponas anever-presentthreatto the "life-line"of the Empire,not to mention
its ideologicalprinciples.This was so despiteallvicissitudesofpolicyandattitudebasedupon
the variable"powerpositions"of the two states as seen fromTokyo. The anti-Bolshevism
of Japanesegovernmentalleaders-whether military or civilian-was implacableand in-
variable.It was the ultimateandunchangingfoundationof ImperialJapan'sattitudetoward
the Soviet Union.
But on the level of pragmaticpolicy, afterthe summerof I94I the Japanese-SovietNeu-
tralityPactbecamethe indispensablepremiseofJapan'sability to dealwith the problemof
the SouthSeas.It is one of the most sublimeironiesof historythat underthe pressureof later
events the ImperialJapaneseGovernmentwas forcedincreasinglyto rely upon the hated
Bolsheviksfor the maintenanceof the conditionslaid down in the NeutralityPact.