Schools of Thought in SLA

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

Schools of Thought in Second Language Acquisition

Mohd Alimie Muhammad Nasrul Amira Husna Nurul Ain Wan Ajrina Ili Kamilah

Structuralism / Behaviorism
Time Frame: Early 1900s &1940s & 1950s Also known as structural or descriptive and empiricist school of linguistics Advocates: Leonard Bloomfield, Edward Sapir, Charles Hockett, Charles Fries, and others

Characteristics
Behaviorists saw learning as behavior change through habit formation - Language is a subset of learned behaviors, so language learning was seen as being similar to any other kind of learning. A connection is established between a stimulus (S) and the organism s response (R) to the stimulus.

Humans are exposed to many things in their environment so the response they give to stimuli will be reinforced if successful and will become a habit or if unsuccessful be abandoned. First and second language acquisition (SLA) apply the basic principles: imitation, practice, reinforcement/feedback and habit formation following stimulus-response. By imitating & repeating the same structures, a person can learn a language.

Structuralism believe: Language could be dismantled into small pieces or units and these units could be described scientifically, contrasted, and added up again to form the whole.

Rationalism and Cognitive Psychology


Time frame: 1960s &1970s Also known as generative-transformational school of linguistics Advocates: Noam Chomsky and Ferdinand de Saussure

Characteristics
Human language cannot be scrutinized simply in terms of observable stimuli and responses or the volumes of raw data gathered by field linguists. The rationalist linguist has a formalist view of language: the child is preprogrammed for acquiring language (Language Acquisition Device = LAD) because universal grammar is innate.

They believed that the SLA process can be understood better by first understanding how the human brain processes and learns new information They were interested in both performance & competence (Chomsky) or what is also known as Parole & Langue (Ferdinand de Saussure)
Performance: Parole: the actual use and realization of language the appliance of language, the actual process of speaking.

Competence:

Langue:

a speaker s knowledge of his language that enables him to understand an infinite number of sentences often never heard or produced before./a person's underlying and unobservable language ability. the general system of language

Rationalism believe:
SLA is closely-related to Performance/Parole= Using a language. & Competence/Langue= The linguistic system underlying second language grammars and its constructions.

Constructivism

Time frame: 1980s,1990s & early 2000 Advocates: Jean Piaget & Lev Vygotsky

Characteristics
All human beings construct their own version of reality, and therefore multiple contrasting ways of knowing and describing are equally legitimate. This school focuses on individuals engaged in social practices, ... on collaborate group., [or] on global community (Spivey, 1997, p. 24)

Concentrated on topics such as: conversational discourse, sociocultural factors in learning, cooperative group learning, interlanguage variables, and interactionism theories Learners are thought to construct internal representations as mental pictures of the target language (TL). These internal representations are thought to develop, in predictable stages, in the direction of the full second language system.

Constructivism believe:
The learner needs not to actually speak or write in order to acquire the language. Acquisition takes place internally as learners read and hear samples of the language that they understand.

Summary

Reference:
1. Document downloaded from King Abdul Aziz Department of European Languages and Literature 2. Notes on: Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 4th. ed. http://tuninst.net/LAT/nBrown4/n-ch01/n-ch01.htm

You might also like