Daf Hakashrus20 10TB

s p e C i a l
e X p a n d e d
e d i t i O n
Daf HaK 200 ashrus

Ma z E l
Tov!
VOL. f / NO. 10 ELUL 5772 - TISHREI 5773 / SEPT.-OCT. 2012 YOMIM NORAIM EDITION
swwxc
THE
our
th ISSuE
a mOnthly newsletteR fOR the OU RaBBiniC field RepResentative
)( ' ' ' "

he who has 100, desires to make of them 200. While this axiom relates to financial wealth, it can be applied to spiritual matters as well. In particular, as editor of The Daf, this maamar Chazal resonates for me in a very meaningful way. We began publishing The Daf in June 1992. In July 2002, I was privileged to edit the 100th issue of The Daf HaKahsrus. Now ten years later, with great thanks to Hashem Yisborach, I have the great zechus to present the 200th issue of The Daf.

It has been a great privilege to edit The Daf. I am highly gratified that many individuals have approached me over the years in person or by other means of communication, to express the pleasure and educational value they have had from reading The Daf. May Hashem grant me the merit to edit The Daf for many years to come. After all, he who edits 200 issues of The Daf, looks forward to 400 as well! Rabbi Yosef Grossman, Editor
This special expanded issue contains many articles from gifted writers and kashrus experts who are either currently or were previously employed by the OU. I take this opportunity to thank everyone who contributed articles to this volume and the past 199 issues of The Daf for their insightful and educational contributions. Kosher consumers, RFRs, RCs and communal rabbis owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to these writers for 20 years of outstanding material.
the tzibbur has been his formal involvement in kashrus hashPsakim from Rav Belsky, Shlita gachah for more than 20 years. As a zechus for Rav Belskys health during his recent illness, a daily email was distributed which included a short kashrus-related psak halacha from CO mpiled By Rav Belsky. The series was named vekasher hadavar and a R aBB i dO vid CO hen total of 75 psakim were distributed until Rav Belsky was Administrative Rabbinical Coordinator, CRC Chicago healthy enough to return home. The contributors ranged Rabbinic Coordinator, OU 1999 - 2006 from those who sent in just one ruling or interacted with Rav Belsky for one Shabbos, to those who sent in multiple piskei halacha and learnt from Rav Belsky for decades. The following is a sampling of those psakim, with one item from almost all of the contributors: (Editors Note: Rav Belsky, Shlita reviewed the submissions presented below and agreed to them being published. Any additions within { } are from Rav Belsky as indicated.) COffee Submitted by: Rabbi Sholem Y. Fishbane There are possible halachic justifications for permitting coffee prepared or served in utensils which were possibly washed with non-kosher dishes, but Rav Belsky held that it is not within the spirit of the law to permit such items. Rather, it is our mission as a hashgachah to not recommend products which are not so bad and rely on heteirim. Rav Belsky himself does not drink coffee {served from the carafes} on an airplane; {instead, he asks the airplane stewardess to fill his cup directly from the coffee machine located in the airplanes galley which is not washed with non-kosher dishes.} COnveCtiOn Oven Submitted by: Rabbi Yosef Wikler Convection ovens shut off when the door is opened. That means that if a Jew originally turned on the oven and a non-Jewish cook opens the door to put the food inside, keeping it open for a few minutes, during that time the oven will cool down. Then when he closes the door after,
continued on page 64
vekasheR hadavaR
One Of Rav Belskys well-known contributions to
Published by the Orthodox Union, Eleven Broadway, New York, NY 10004
please direct your comments to RaBBi yOsef GROssman, editOR at 212-613-8212 or [email protected]
ts the Two Hundredth Kashruth Division of the OU presen It is with great pleasure that the Issue of The Daf HaKashrus. hruth information and ial vehicle of communicating kas The Daf has served as our essent of information is the are . The proper flow elucidating important issues that anization. core of a successful kashruth org giga Daf, I referred to the Gemara in Cha In the One Hundredth Issue of The . This is ,but Chazal also tell us s spiritual treasure as monetary possessions, but to one not only referring to material and her growth in dredth milestone, we aspire for furt well. After reaching this two hun ds. and enhancing Kashruth standar disseminating Torah information Grossman who is more iration and talent of Rabbi Yosef All of this is due to the insight, insp The Daf. than the editor, but the father of May he and the Kashruth Divisio n go .
Sincerely yours,
Menachem Genack Rabbinic Administrator, CEO
54 |
THE DAf HAkASHRUS
CReatinG the Best pOssiBle RelatiOnship with kashRUs aGenCies wORldwide

R a B B i dO v id he B eR
Kashrus Administrator, Star-K Kosher Certification Rabbinic Coordinator, Orthodox Union 1991-1993
thorized production of a product with their symbol. Without your input it will most likely be bah leeday michshol. If you visit a plant which also produces items with a different hechsher and you discover a problem with their product, the other agency should be notified. Check with the main office how this should be dealt with. If in this plant you also serve as the mashgiach for this other agency, it is vital that you frequently check up on their products as well and file reports with them. COmmUniCatinG with OtheR aGenCies Kashrus offices are quite busy. Therefore, if you discover a problem with another agencys product and report it without a response, confirm with them directly who the report should go to and then email it directly to that person. Sending a problem report to another agencys general email inbox and then claiming, I reported it to them and they did not respond - they probably dont care anyway, is not an appropriate way to follow up on an important discovery. dUal hashGaCha pROtOCOl Familiarize yourself with the protocols of a plant that is certified by more than one agency. When relevant, know who the other mashgiach is and discuss issues in the plant that help you both get the job done. One should never bad mouth another agency in front of company personnel. Besides being lashon harah and possibly rechilus, it is a huge chillul Hashem. Furthermore, in the long run Kashrus usually suffers. Vhamayvin yavin.
i am periodically asked about the relationship between different Kashrus agencies. The answer is Excellent - two days dont go by without my communicating with a member of another Kashrus agency. I am sure many Kashrus administrators can make the same statement. Indeed there are differences that periodically arise, but generally Kashrus agencies work very closely to ensure the highest Kashrus standards for Kosher consumers.
There are numerous instances which call for Kashrus agencies to communicate with each other. The following is a discussion of how to utilize the relationships with other agencies in order to benefit the work kashrus administrators and mashgichim do on a daily basis.
inGRedient ClaRifiCatiOn How often do you walk into a plant and find an ingredient without the symbol on the container as required by another Kashrus agency? There is also a protocol when conducting an initial inspection of a Furthermore, an ingredient that requires a mashgiachs signature plant that has an existing hechsher. This can get tricky and is beyond may not have one. You may wish to determine from the other agency the scope of this article. Discuss this with the main office of your as to why the symbol or signature was left off. Did the product agency. If you are visiting a contract manufacturer who will now also lose its hechsher? Was this a non-kosher run? If either of the above be producing for your company it is professional courtesy to inform are true, this ingredient obviously may not be used and may need the other hechsher that you are visiting their plant. It is also advisto be locked up, removed from the plant or destroyed. However, able to speak with the current mashgiach for an overview and any tips perhaps the omission was an oversight and indeed with an exchange from someone who probably knows the plant inside and out and can of lot numbers with the other agency you can advise you on any behind the scenes issues confirm that the ingredient is indeed 100% with production or personnel. Check with the kosher. The mashgiach must report such issues One shOuld never main office to set this up. Finally, the other to the office and not allow the plant to use the agency may wish to send in their mashgiach bad mOuth anOther ingredient until it is clarified. Office personnel to accompany you and answer any questions agency in frOnt Of must follow up with the other Kashrus agency. or concerns during your visit. This is especially cOmpany persOnnel. If the ingredient is delicate or production is true if the factory is complex. In the long run, being held up and office personnel cannot be this last step often saves time in setting up the reached, the mashgiach may need to contact plant as questions are answered on the spot instead of the back and the other Kashrus agency directly as soon as possible. forth that can easily hold up Kosher certification. If you are on the receiving end of such an inquiry you should respond as soon as possible. Bear in mind, a factory may be holding up production due to the missing symbol or signature and only you know whether the ingredient is Kosher or not. A quick response is vital. Of course, certain inquiries by other agencies should not be answered. For example, proprietary information should not be shared (e.g. What is the formulation for this product?). Furthermore, certain questions should be referred to the office (e.g. Do you rely on certain leniencies in this plant?). disCOveRinG a kashRUs viOlatiOn that affeCts anOtheR aGenCy If you discover labels from a different agency, you should inquire whether or not the other agency visits the factory, try to get a copy of the label, and determine whether the product is kosher. If you are told that the other agency does not visit the plant or the product is not kosher, there is a good chance that these labels are unauthorized. An immediate call should be made to the other agency. This agency has no way of knowing their labels are being used, possibly illegally, in this plant. Your report may help the other agency stop an unauIf you administrate a plant that is certified by another agency, periodically check with your colleague at the other hechsher and their mashgiach to make sure all is okay with your product. It is a mistake to think that your products are being monitored through automatic pilot, because the plant is certified by a reliable agency. Perhaps a new mashgiach visits the plant and has no idea that he is supposed to monitor your products. Furthermore, if the plant is a contract manufacturer, the other agency will typically not certify the entire plant, but rather the production that relates to the products they certify. The need to monitor the products that have the other hechsher will easily fall through the cracks. A careful, thorough, and periodic evaluation with the other agency sometimes simply via phone or email - is necessary. knOw the eXpeRts The Kashrus field is blessed with many experts in an array of areas. A good relationship with these professionals is vital. Often a mashgiach or administrator requires background knowledge of a situation before discussing the shaala with the agencys poskim or the general situation with the executive staff.
THE DAf HAkASHRUS |
55
Odd-nUmBeRed fatty aCids
Emersol 120. In support of the application the company provided a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), which, as its name indicates, imparts R a B B i GavR iel pR iC e technical information relevant to people handling the material. A secRC, Ingredient Registry tion titled Composition/Information on Ingredients often contains information helpful in evaluating the kashrus of the material, and the ,ingredients department routinely receives this document in support of an application for an ingredient that is not properly certified. In this case .the applying company manufactures non-edible products and our only criterion for acceptability is whether the ingredient is animal-based or not
ReCently an OU company applied to use an ingredient called
Emersol 120 is a stearic acid. Stearic acid can be derived from animal or vegetable fat, so simply knowing the technical name of the product is inadequate. However, section three identifies the other fatty acids present in this sample of stearic acid (stearic acid, like any natural fatty acid, is .71-always bundled with other fatty acids; the fatty acid most present will determine its name). One of them is margaric acid, or C Joe Wagner, Director of Quality and Product Technology, Twin Rivers Technologies, once noted that when an odd-numbered fatty acid is pres,ent in a given sample of fatty acid its origin must have been from animal fat. Odd-numbered fatty acids in the medium and long-chain fatty acid range are not found in vegetable-based fats. Based on this MSDS, then, the application for this .ingredient was rejected
(" ' " ") . ( " ' " ) . , ' , ( " ' " " " ").

OU RFR - Italy
" (" ' " " " ) " ' , ' , ' , , , , " , , , " ' . ' " " , , ", ' ' " " " " , " " ". " " . '' ' " " " " , , , , ". : , , " " , " " ", ' , " " ' , .
56 continued on page
, " ".
THE DAf HAkASHRUS
| 65
enzyme mOdified Cheese flavORs

R a B B i GavRiel p R iC e
RC, Ingredient Registry
aBOUt thirty years ago a fast-food chain
tion of how long cheese should age before someone who eats it is constrained in what he eats. Enzyme modified cheese would be an example of this kind of process. EMC is not cheese proper, however, but a liquid cheese concentrate. It is added, as such, to cheese slices, as well as to other products such as dressings and sauces. This means that, practically speaking, we can rule out the possibility that a consumer would encounter enzyme modified cheese in a form that would actually require him to wait six hours. Yad Yehuda (Y.D. 89, 30) writes that the requirement to wait after eating strong (or hard) cheese applies only to and not to a . As relates to the stringency of waiting after eating hard cheese, we can define a as something in which cheese is either not in it at all (that is, the cheese has been removed) or the cheese is blended in (and not identifiable) and is a of the ( heard from Rav Schachter, shlita). Since a liquid form of enzyme modified cheese flavor is always a
,eating a product containing it would not mean that a person would have to wait any time at all before eating meat. EMC can also be spray-dried, however, and made into a powder. In this form it is incorporated into a seasoning and added to crackers, popcorn, chips, and other snacks. The OU certifies crackers with a parmesan and peppercorn seasoning, popcorn with parmesan seasoning and similar products. In this case the cheese is ,and if the seasoning is primarily either genuinely aged parmesan (or another aged) cheese or enzyme modified cheese then a person eating the cracker should wait six hours before eating meat. According to product specialists at companies that handle enzyme modified cheeses, however, specialized cheese seasonings such as parmesan often contain other bulkier ingredients, such as whey or blander cheese flavors, as a primary ingredient. Therefore, in these cases, the specialized cheese would be a of the seasoning and not necessitate waiting after eating it, before eating meat. Rav Schachters teshuva on this topic can be found in I-209.
was searching for a cost-effective way to boost the flavor of the processed cheese slice complementing the hamburger patty on its signature product. Adding flavor to the cheese was not an option because the FDA would not permit flavor substitutes in a product called cheese. The ingredient would have to come from cheese itself. Blending in aged cheese, which is full of flavor, was also not an option, because it failed the cost-effective criterion (the aging process is expensive). The company commissioned Dr. N.R. Gandhi, a biochemist at Utah State, to find a solution. Dr. Gandhi came up with a novel ingredient that was derived from cheese, imparted the full flavor profile of aged cheese, but was dramatically less expensive than aged cheese itself. Using a small handful of industriallysynthesized enzymes and adjusting conditions of its preparation, he accelerated the aging process and produced a cheese concentrate in two days, as opposed to the many months it would ordinarily take. The ingredient was accepted by the FDA for addition to pasteurized processed cheese (more commonly referred to as American cheese or cheese slices) and dubbed enzyme modified cheese flavor. Dr. Gandhi and his wife went on to found a specialty ingredients company, Jeneil Biotech, in Saukville, WI, which is certified by the OU. Enzyme modified cheese is now produced by a number of companies. Not only is the process novel, the halachic consequences are as well. The Rema (Y.D. 89, 2) rules that just as a person should wait six hours after eating meat before eating dairy, a person should wait after eating hard cheese before eating meat. The Shach cites Toras Chatas, which states that cheese aged six months can be assumed to have developed an intensity that would require a person who ate it to wait six hours (or according to his custom) before eating meat. Poskim understand this to mean that the types of cheeses that are typically aged for six months can be assumed to be flavorful enough that a person who eats it should wait before eating meat, but if a product could be prepared in a shorter amount of time, with the same result, it would, of course, be subject to the restriction cited by the Rema (see, for example, Pri Megadim, M.Z. 89, 4). The OU poskim follow this position that six months is not an absolute number, but rather an indica-
hOw dOes enzyme mOdified Cheese wORk?

Enzyme modified cheese flavor starts with fresh or unripened cheese cheese which has not yet had the opportunity to age, and therefore lacks flavor. The distinctive and complex flavors we associate with cheese are the result of a broad cascade of biochemical and chemical reactions initiated by microflora naturally present in fresh cheese curd. The result is hundreds of chemicals that constitute the flavor profile of a given cheese. These processes take place over time. Cheddar cheese must be aged at least two months before it assumes the identity we associate with it; Romano, five months, Reggiano and parmesan, ten. Time costs money. The key question for a food chemist is how to unlock the flavor latent in fresh cheese without having to wait for the natural processes to perform this task on their own. More simply: can the process be accelerated? Enzyme technology provides a solution. Enzymes are biological chemicals that catalyze biochemical reactions. They are the agents of change in biological processes, including those responsible for the natural development of flavor in cheese. Since the mid-twentieth century, advances in understanding how enzymes work have provided scientists with ways of isolating and developing enzymes that could be used for diverse industrial applications, including the food industry. In many of the applications the industrially-produced enzymes are used simply zto accelerate by many orders of magnitude processes that would have otherwise evolved without them. The use of enzymes in fresh cheese follows this model. As cheese ages, the microflora naturally present in the curd release enzymes among them lipases and proteases -- that break down milk fat and milk proteins to yield chemicals like fatty acids and amino acids that form just a portion of the constituents of a cheeses flavor profile. In the production of enzyme modified cheese flavor, industrially-made enzymes, including lipases and proteases, modify the fresh cheese theyre added to by powering the biochemical processes that would have otherwise run their course. The principal job of a mashgiach at an enzyme modified cheese company is to ensure that the enzymes, which are extremely kosher-sensitive, are approved. A number of complex processing and ingredient considerations play a role in enabling enzyme modification processes to occur. The fresh curd must be grated and pasteurized and various ingredients are added. Temperature and length of incubation, timing of addition of the enzymes, and selection of the enzymes are some of the factors that contribute to the development of a targeted flavor profile. When the right conditions are in place, an enzyme modified cheese flavor can be produced in one to four days, as opposed to months.
THE DAf HAkASHRUS |
57
for mashgichim to charge for hashgacha work that they do on Shabbos and Yomtov? If a mashgiach is kept late at a R a B B i e l i G eR sten plant on Friday and RC Recorder of OU Psak and Policy is forced to spend Shabbos in a hotel, is he entitled to get compensated for his Shabbos away from home?
rrugk tkt h,tc tk
is it permissible
seChaR shaBBOs
sUkkah
The Gemara (Bava Metzia 58a) explains that a Jewish watchman may not accept payment for working on Shabbos (sechar shabbos), unless he is hired for a duration longer than just Shabbos. Therefore, if he is paid by the hour or hired by the day, he may not get paid for Shabbos, but if he is hired by the week then he may get paid for Shabbos (havlaah). The Chayei Adam (Shabbos 60:8) writes that even if one is hired to watch for an hour before and after Shabbos, that is enough for the payment of Shabbos to be considered bhavlaah, provided that he is not paid by the hour but rather he is paid by the job. Shulchan Aruch (O.C. 306:5) brings two opinions as to whether the issur of sechar Shabbos applies to Chazanim or others hired to perform a mitzvah (e.g. shofar). The Mishna Berurah (306:24) concludes that the minhag is to allow sechar shabbos for a dvar mitzvah, but one who does will not receive beracha from that money. One, who wishes to be machmir, should not charge for Shabbos, and then if they are compensated, they may accept the money as a gift. The Taz (585:7) writes that sechar shabbos is only permitted for a dvar mitzvah that is a benefit to that Shabbos. So for example, a mashgiach at a kidush or a shabbos seuda (dvar mitzvah) may accept sechar shabbos, but a mashgiach at a gevinas Yisroel plant or supervising a grape harvest, would not be permitted to accept sechar shabbos. Additionally, Rav Schachter was skeptical as to whether industrial kashrus can be considered a sufficient dvar mitzvah with respect to this din of accepting sechar Shabbos, since there would be plenty of kosher wine or cheese available even without supervising the Shabbos productions. Therefore, he felt it would be incorrect for a mashgiach in these situations to rely on the heter of dvar mitzvah.
fOR eight days each year, the OU must not only certify the food which is sold in the restaurant, but must also certify the buildRaBB i eli G eRsten ing in which it is RC Recorder of OU Psak and Policy eaten. These eight days of course are Sukkos. The OU requires every restaurant to provide accommodations - either on site or within a reasonable distance of the establishment - for those wishing to eat in a kasher sukkah. It is therefore incumbent on us to ensure that the sukkos meet all the halachic requirements. Here is a brief review of some of the more common issues with sukkos.
rrugk tkt h,tc tk
enviROnment The Sukkah should not be located in an area that has a bad smell1. It cannot be placed under a tree or awning. walls A kasher sukkah must have at least 3 walls. The minimum length of a wall is 7 tefachim (~28 inches). The wall must be at least 10 tefachim tall (~40 inches), and must come within 3 tefachim (9 inches) of the ground (i.e. it may not be suspended in the air more than 9 inches). The walls may not blow in the wind2. This is a very common problem with canvas sukkos. One solution is to install a series of tight belts that will not blow in the wind that wrap around the sukkah. The first belt is placed within 9 inches of the floor and the next within 9 inches of the first, and so on, until one reaches above 40 inches. Thus, with a series of four parallel belts (each slightly wider than an inch) one can create a halachic wall. sChaCh Years ago, putting up schach referred to the tedious process of placing hundreds of single stalks of bamboo or lath across the top of ones sukkah. Today, this task has been greatly simplified due to the proliferation of schach mats. However, this brings up a new series of issues of which one needs to be cognizant. Does the schach mat come with a reliable hashgacha? Mats that are made for lying on are pasul. (Shulchan Aruch O.C. 629:6) Mats that are woven together with a davar hamikabel tumah are pasul (see Igeros Moshe O.C. I:177). Rav Belsky informs me that regrettably in the past there have been mats which were made for sitting on that were inappropriately given hashgacha. It is therefore imperative to ascertain who gives the hashgacha on the mats and make sure it is a reliable hechsher.
...they may be cOmpensated fOr having tO spend shabbOs away frOm hOme.
Rav Schachter said that it is permissible for a mashgiach to be paid a preset amount for the inconvenience of being away from home for Shabbos (similar to ,) so long as this payment is not contingent on any work that the mashgiach is required to do on Shabbos. So for example, if a mashgiach must stay late at a factory and will not be able to get home for Shabbos, they may be compensated for having to spend Shabbos away from home. This is not sechar Shabbos because they are not being paid for any work that they are doing on Shabbos. Likewise, a mashgiach at a grape harvest or gevinas Yisroel company or any other comparable situation may be paid a fixed amount for being away from home on Shabbos, so long as the amount that he is paid is not contingent on any work done (i.e. the mashgiach will get paid whether or not he performs any work on Shabbos). Although of course the tzibur is relying that the mashgiach will be conscientious of his responsibilities even during Shabbos, however it is understood that payment for Shabbos is not based on whether any work is done. For example, if three mashgichim are at a plant on Shabbos and they divide up the watching such that mashgiach A will watch for 6
58 |
THE DAf HAkASHRUS
ask OU 11
The Program and Its Varied Participants
stephen steine R
Director of OU Public Relations
Grossman, OU Kosher Senior Educational Rabbinic Coordinator, who puts together a variety of ASKOU initiatives sponsored by the Harry H. Beren Foundation of Lakewood, NJ. The three-week session is directed at advanced semicha and kollel students to provide them with an in-depth kashrus internship, while the one-week training program is aimed at congregational rabbis, semicha and kollel students and members of a Vaad HaKashrus who want to refine their skills for use in their local communities. At the conclusion of the program Rabbi Grossman remarked, I am very pleased that this years ASK OU participants, representing a rich variety of individuals from across the spectrum of Orthodox Jewry, will join the over 800 graduates who have completed the ASK OU programs since their inception in 1996. We are most gratified that these ASK OU trained individuals, as their fellow graduates in the past, will continue to strengthen the highest standards of kashrus on a global level. Rabbi Yehoshua Horowitz participated in the one-week program. He is the grandson of the Bostoner Rebbe of Boston and Har Nof and the son of the current Bostoner Rebbe of New York, the Chuster Rav. He himself is the Bostoner Rav of Monsey, NY The course was very informative and gevaldic, done very professionally, and provided excellent information, he said. Im looking to be a part-time mashgiach and so I was interested in the program. I would advise it very much for others to take it. Shlomo Blum, originally of Verona, NJ, now resides at Yishuv Eli, near Shilo in Israel. He is well familiar with the standards of OU Kosher, given his six years of employment as a cook at the OUs Seymour J. Abrams Jerusalem World Center. He took a course last year in Israel to become a mashgiach; when his wife saw the ASK OU program advertised on the Internet she told him about it. Since he was planning on coming to the U.S. to visit his mother, he had the
Monsey and Lakewood, as would be expected, but they arrived from Houston and Israel as well. They are the scions of great rabbinic families; students in kollel; and hail from both the Ashkenazi and Sephardic communities. They came to sit at the feet of the masters, by participating in the 11th cycle of the three-and-one-week Harry H. Beren ASKOU Kashrus Summer Programs, offered by the Orthodox Union every other summer; based on discussions with them, they went home with a deeper understanding of both the age-old halachot of kashrus and of their applications to modern food technology. The masters, starting with OU Kosher CEO Rabbi Menachem Genack, are the rabbinic experts of OU Kosher. They taught about fish; the kosher contract; cheese and whey; machinery; fermentation; cake; foodservice protocols and kashering; hashgacha; enzymes and emulsifiers; hafroshas challah; yoshon; Yoreh Deah and non-Jewish factories; kosher birds and eggs; unauthorized OU hechshers; baking; OU certification in India, Turkey and Egypt; and Pesach all-year round.
the 70 students came from Brooklyn, of course, and from
mail
a letteR Of appReCiatiOn
A variety of participants at the Harry H. Beren ASK OU Kashrus programs (l to r): Rabbi Dovid Sochet, Spring Valley, NY; Rabbi Chaim Weiss, Houston, TX; OU Kashrus Education Director, Rabbi Yosef Grossman; Rabbi Yehoshua Horowitz, Monsey, NY; Shlomo Blum, Yishuv Eli, Israel; Rabbi Raphael Sliw, Brooklyn, NY; and Rabbi Menachem Lichtenstein, Monsey, NY.
Participants also learned about 21st century kashrus technology; oleo chemicals; wisdom from the field; bishul akum, the in-town Vaad HaKashrus; schmaltz; the mesorah of kosher birds and animals; insect infestation; bedikas toyloim; halacha and limaaseh in food service; the Shabbos kiddush; birchos HaMashgiach; poultry; meat; the kosher slaughterhouse; nikkur (with a demonstration); the OU kosher consumer hotline; ingredients; how to kasher; the local fish store; and wine and grape juice. This was by no means strictly a lecture course. The participants visited OU Kosher restaurants, factories and hotel kitchens. They learned to do an audit review of a restaurant. They reviewed the halachot of kashrus with OU Kosher posek Rav Hershel Schachter of Yeshiva University. They participated in an Ask the OU Rabbonim session led by Rabbi Moshe Elefant, Chief Operating Officer of OU Kosher, who was joined by several rabbinic coordinators. The complex program was organized, as always, by Rabbi Yosef
Every Jewish child growing up knows the symbol for best kashrus is the OU. Summer is the time when a lot of kollel/yeshiva students are looking for a productive and practical opportunity. No one could have asked for better than the program Rabbi Grossman put together. Three weeks of hearing from the most knowledgeable experts in each field of kashrus is something everyone grew from. Each RC that addressed us was an expert in the field that they work with everyday and know everything about. The lessons enabled even a non expert in the field to get a basic understanding of how the industry works and how it effects kashrus. We gained as well from hands on experiences in the field. Rabbi Grossman managed to utilize every minute of the three weeks as true learning moments. He arranged a flawless schedule which allowed everything to run smoothly. He assured that we had only the best speakers and visits to experts for hands on training. The OU was available to teach about every policy and prove true transparency. Being able to learn more about this special organization and everything it does to benefit Klal Yisroel was truly an amazing opportunity. Im thankful to everyone in the organization and Rabbi Grossman for giving me this opportunity. May they all only have Hatzlocha with everything in the future. Sincerely, Nachum Greenberg, Intern
THE DAf HAkASHRUS | 59
perfect opportunity to sign up for the oneweek session. Its an excellent course, I learned a lot, the rabbis were excellent, Mr. Blum said, as he singled out insects, maaser, wine and meat as special areas of interest. He even suggested to one of the OU rabbis that he come to Israel and teach a class there.
AS k O U
continued from page 59
production and the general policies of kashrus. A participant in the one-week class, he added, I wouldnt mind taking the longer program. Meet Reb Chaim Leib Weiss of Houston, Texas, whose hat would be appropriate in both shul and at a rodeo. A participant in the oneweek program, he works as a mashgiach-on-call for the Houston Kashrus Association. His kosher coordinator at work told him about the program and asked if he wanted to attend; the answer, of course, was yes. Previously, Reb Weiss worked with other kashrus organizations; now he was learning from OU Kosher. Its another way of thinking. I see great similarities and some differences between the agencies, he said. Taking the program broadened my perspective, Reb Weiss said. Rabbi David Sochet of Monsey, who took the one-week session, is the son of the Karlin-Stolin Rebbe. I very much enjoyed the program; there are a lot of things you can gain from it, he said. The shiurim were very enjoyable and I definitely would consider the three-week program the next time. I will tell my friends about it. For preliminary information on the 12th cycle, to be offered in the summer of 2014, contact Rabbi Grossman at [email protected] or 212-613-8212. Our avodas hakodesh in Yorah Dayah is not a license to transgress the other parts of Shulchan Aruch including Choshen Mishpat and does not allow us to speak or be mekabel lashon horah about others, unless it is muhter al pi halacha. The fact we are able to sometimes say something negative about another agency to warn the consumer (I cant recommend this fleishige restaurant as there is no mashgiach or shomer Shabbos on-site wat all times or Our agency considers this product treif as it contains gelatin derived from non-Kosher animals) is not a carte blanche heter to publicize every mistake and blunder of the personnel of other Kashrus agencies. Always remember that the ultimate goal of the Kashrus professional is to serve the needs of Klal Yisroel by fulfilling the Ratzon Hashem. Thus, we all have a common need to work towards the same goal of elevating standards of kashrus and insuring that the food is kosher. Rav Shraga Faivel Mendelovitz ztl sent some of his best talmidim from Torah Vodaas to help establish other Yeshivos, because he recognized that all Yeshivos are promoting one Torah and serving one Ribbono Shel Olam. Yeshivos are not competing businesses. This should be the attitude in kashrus, as well. The last Mishna in all of Shas states Lo motzah Hakodosh Boruch Hu kli machzik brocho LYisroel elah hasholom (Uktzin 3:12). This applies to all dimensions of human endeavor, and kal vichomer it should certainly apply in mileches hakodesh. Furthermore, we all must remember that when companies sense that there is competiveness between agencies, we are communicating to them that kashrus is a business. That is a chilul Hashem, and it lowers the importance of what we are doing. How can a company respect our religious values if it appears that our primary interest is in certifying more companies and making more money? Providing a hechsher is doing avodas Hashem, but using it as a business opportunity and competing with others for the market share diminishes, perverts, and distorts the mitzvos of Hashem. Insuring that our Kashrus work with our colleagues throughout the world is performed using the guidelines of Yorah Dayah together with the other three chalakim of Shulchan Aruch as transmitted to us by our Rebbeim and poskim, allows us to serve the Ribbono Shel Olam in the greatest possible manner - Lshaim ultiferes.
Rabbi Raphael Sliw, originally from London, England, has resided in Borough Park in Brooklyn for the past eight years. He is in kollel with his father-in-law, Rabbi Gedalia Machlis, and his grandfather is Rabbi Moshe Wolfson, shlita. Rabbi Sliw chose to take the threeweek program to lead to something else regarding career and for the knowledge itself. He was deeply impressed by the mind-boggling amounts of halacha in all aspects of kashrus and their applications. Chicago native Rabbi Menachem Lichtenstein, now of Monsey, is the son of the head of the Federation Kashrus Bet Din in London England. He attributes his presence in the program to two friends who took it in the tenth cycle, two years ago, and recommended it highly. They told me its a great thing not just to learn, but to see the kashrus organization from the point of view of the people who run it. Rabbi Lichtenstein particularly enjoyed the visits to plants and restaurants, where he saw the basics of the food industry, food
Often, colleagues in your agency have that information. However, at times it is continued from page 55 advisable to hear how other agencies deal with a particular situation or hear a second opinion regarding the metzios. This includes discussing products (This is the first time I will see such a product manufactured, what should I look out for?), ingredients (I recently heard a rumor that this ingredient is not so pashut), equipment (How is it heated?), kashering procedures (Would you require libun or is hagala enough?), and hashgacha protocol (How often would you visit such a plant?). Experts are usually more than happy to assist in any way they can, and more often than not you will pick up a chiddushdikke tip.
AGENCIES
familiaRize yOURself with pROJeCts that aGenCies aRe wORkinG On JOintly Over the years, I have had the opportunity to work in conjunction with some great Kashrus personnel in agencies worldwide. Some of these projects have been under the auspices of AKO while other projects have been simply inter-agency. It is worthwhile for other agencies to utilize the information and systems that came from these meetings and numerous other committees and projects beyond the scope of this article. Joint projects include the AKO Ingredient Committee where group 1 ingredients are discussed, the creation of the Universal Kashrus Database (open to other agencies willing to share their product information), and the committee to determine the recommended number of frequencies for industries/plants. There are many more, as well, that have benefited many Kashrus agencies. develOpinG and maintaininG a GOOd RelatiOnship Keep in touch with other mashgichim and kashrus administrators. Read their literature to pick up yedios and trends and compliment them when they do a good job or when they write divrei Torah or an informative article on Kashrus inyanim. Dont be so quick to criticize other agencies because in the near future you may need to work with them and a warm relationship is vital. Although, our primary work relates to Yorah Dayah we must remember, especially in dealing with other agencies, that there are other chalakim of Shulchan Aruch and additional halacha seforim including Sefer Shmiras Halashon written by the Chofetz Chaim.
60 |
THE DAf HAkASHRUS
' "
with an aBUndanCe Of sOap Yirmiyahu 2:22

R a B B i z Us he y Osef B le Ch
Rav Hamachshir, Kehilas Bais Ben Zion, Monsey, NY EarthKosher OU RFR 1984- 1997
shimshOn once confounded the Plishtim with the following riddle (Shoftim 14:14): ( out of the strong came something sweet) and used it as a means of defeating the enemies of Klal Yisroel. While the solution he was seeking was honey, modern chemistry might have suggested an entirely different sweet derivative of a strong and bitter source soap. Soap, one of the mainstays of a civilized society, is the quintessential vile-tasting material to which many a foul-mouthed child may attest yet its production yields a sweet byproduct. In addition, soaps putrid property has a distinct Kashrus advantage. The Shulchan Aruch (Y.D. 95:4) ruled that one may wash dirty meat and dairy dishes together if ashes were added to the water, thereby insuring that any meat or dairy residue would be rendered foul-tasting (pagum). As we shall see, adding ashes to fat opens many new vistas in chemistry and food science, and gives us cause to reexamine some basic kashrus assumptions.
Triglycerides are the main constituents of both animal and vegetable oil. Classified as esters, they are composed of three fatty acids attached to a glycerol molecule. Glycerol, a trihydric alcohol, has three hydroxyl (-OH) groups, each allowing for a fatty acid to attach to it. [Glycerol is the chemical name the ol ending signifies that it is an alcohol. In the food industry, it is usually known by its trivial name glycerin.] Soap is produced by breaking the bonds (a process known as hydrolysis) between the fatty acids and glycerol, and then neutralizing the fatty acids with a strong alkali known as lye (such as sodium or potassium hydroxide), a process known as saponification. Chemically, the resulting molecule is a salt (a neutralized acid), one end of which (the fatty acid) is hydrophobic (water hating) and the other is hydrophilic (water loving). Water and fat repel each other because fat molecules are hydrophobic. Adding soap, however, allows the two to mix, since one end of the soap molecule will attach to the water and the other to the fat. Soap is therefore an emulsifier which, in this case, can mix with grease and allow water to wash it away, and has been used for cleaning purposes for thousands of years. Historically, the alkali used to make soap, potassium hydroxide, was obtained by steeping wood ashes in water. Indeed, the word alkali comes from the Arabic al-qali meaning burnt ashes. This is actually the same as the Aramaic word for burnt found in the Gmorah. Today, most soap is produced using caustic soda (sodium hydroxide), which may be the referred to in Yirmiyahu ( nitron in Greek is the Hebrew word for sodium). Soap has a bitter taste due to the alkali used in its production, as do the ashes referred to in the Shulchan Aruch. Today, caustic soda is more readily available than ashes, and it is often used as the when Kashering equipment. sOap and kOsheR dishes
Hence, utensils used to cook non-Kosher food cannot be used to cook Kosher or if used to cook meat cannot subsequently be used to cook milk (or vice versa) without ensuring that any absorbed flavors had been purged. Chazal tell us, however, that become unpalatable after they have remained undisturbed in a utensil for twenty-four hours and such flavors are not technically prohibited. Nonetheless, Chazal prohibited using a utensil with the of an otherwise prohibited flavor lest one inadvertently use it within twenty-four hours where the absorbed flavor would not be . When kashering equipment, the ( "Y.D. 121:2) ruled that one should always ensure that a utensil is an to avoid any concerns of non-Kosher flavors contaminating the kashering water and, in turn, contaminating the utensil. In extenuating circumstances, however, many meforshim based on the above-referenced have ruled that one may add ashes (and, presumably, any other bitter agent) to the water, thereby ensuring that any non-Kosher ensuing from the utensil will become before they can do any damage. Soap has traditionally been readily available, bitter, and eminently suited for this purpose. Using soap for this purpose, however, presents another question. Although unpalatable flavors are technically permitted (e.g. ,)Chazal nevertheless prohibited using utensils containing such flavors. May one therefore use foul tasting soap made from nonKosher animal fats to kasher equipment? Similarly, may one wash Kosher dishes with such soaps? The answer to both questions is that there are two types of . One should, indeed, not use a utensil with a that was originally absorbed as a palatable flavor and subsequently became ,such as when non-Kosher food was cooked in a vessel that was then not used for twenty-four hours. On the other hand, where the flavor originally absorbed was already as is the case of foul-tasting animal-based soap the utensil may be used. As such, Rav Moshe Feinstein ()' " ' ' ruled that one may, indeed, wash Kosher dishes with non-Kosher soap without compunction. Today, this is not a significant issue, since virtually all liquid dishwashing solutions are detergents made from petrochemicals and vegetable components and do not contain animal products. It is worth noting, however, that even in the olden days when people did use bar soap for this purpose, the generally accepted custom was to eschew the use of soap made from animal fats. sOap and a kOsheR BOdy ) ( " " Another Halachic issue relating to soap involves the concept of anointing is tantamount to drinking. The Mishnah in Yoma (76b) lists anointing as one of the five enjoyments prohibited on Yom Kippur. It reasons that the liquid so used is absorbed into the body and is considered drinking, based on a pasuk in Tehillim (109:18). A logical extension of this concept would be to prohibit anointing oneself with animal fats, which is precisely the position of the Orchos Chaim, quoted by the Bais Yosef Y.D. 117 and the TaZ (Y.D. 117:15) in the name of the Issur vHeter. This is also the position of the Vilna Gaon ) " " ' " " .(On other hand, many authorities demur and allow anointing with non-Kosher fat for the following reasons. Many Rishonim disagreed with the premise that anointing with fats has any relationship to whatsoever. The Tosafos in Niddah ) " " (" quoted Rabeinu Tam who averred that anointing only applies to liquid oil, and not to solid fats. In addition, the Tosafos in Yoma ) " " "

)( ' " The bitterness of soap has two practical Kashrus applications as it relates to dishes. While we do not actually eat dishes, they do have Kosher concerns. An important Kashrus axiom is that utensils absorb the flavors of the food cooked in them ( ,)and then desorb these flavors into foods subsequently cooked in them (.)
THE DAf HAkASHRUS |
61
SOAP
( asserted that is an that was only instituted for Yom Kippur.
None of these sources deal with soap made from non-kosher fats. The use of non-kosher soap is discussed, however, by the Pri Chadash (Y.D. 117:4), who noted that since it is foul-tasting it is permitted even according to those who prohibit smearing with animal fats. This is also the position of the Aruch haShulchan (Y.D. 117:29), and several contemporary poskim (Beer Moshe 3:87 and Yechave Daat 4:43) concurred with this position. The Biur Halacha ) ,(" ' " " after quoting the disagreement concerning non-kosher fats, agreed that foul-tasting soap made from non-kosher fat poses no concern, although he averred that it would be appropriate to use a kosher alternative where possible. The Darchei Tshuvah (Y.D. 117:33) also opined that since kosher soap is readily available, its use is preferable. Indeed, virtually all liquid soaps are made exclusively from vegetable oils. (" ' " Non-kosher fat, however, is not the only ingredient in soap that may pose a halachic concern. The Talmud (Moed Katan 9b) discussed the importance of skin conditioning cosmetics and some of the ancient procedures endured to achieve a fair complexion. Fortunately, modern preparations are far less harsh and soaps have been developed that not only clean the skin but also soften it. The glycerin developed during soap making has no cleansing value, and is generally removed during its manufacture and recovered for other uses. However, glycerin is a humectant that can serve to maintain moisture in skin, and some therefore leave it in the soap as an emollient, creating translucent glycerin soap with purported skin softening benefits. While this sweet soap enhancement is of no halachic consequence, another soap additive milk may well be. Milk contains fats, vitamins, and other chemicals that ostensibly protect and beautify the skin, and it is claimed that the ancient Romans used it as a skin conditioner (Cleopatra purportedly bathed in mares milk). Adding milk to soap seems to be a more modern invention, with goat milk heading the list of must-have soap additives. The concern with this additive, however, is the issur of basar bcholov which, in addition to prohibiting the cooking milk and meat together, also prohibits the eating and deriving benefit from such a cooked mixture. Most bar soap is made from tallow (beef fat) and, although one does not eat soap, some have raised the concern that addition of milk to the recipe may create a situation of basar bcholov dorysa and thus render the soap assur bhanaah. Fortunately, however, this essential cosmetic tool is not subject to this prohibition, and one need not eschew the use of milk soap, for the following reasons. Ironically, the use of milk and meat mixtures for cleaning purposes was actually discussed by the Maharil, as brought down by the Ramo Y.D. 87:6. Before the days of separate milchig and fleishig stoves, one wood-burning unit sufficed for both, and the spent ashes from these stoves were collected and cooked in a vessel to make a cleaning compound. Invariably, however, the pots of meat and pots of milk boiled over and the ashes under the pots absorbed their overflow. The Maharil did, indeed, forbid using the vessel used to cook these ashes for Kosher food because they had absorbed both meat and milk flavors. The Ramo himself, however, noted that the position of the Maharil is an unnecessary stringency, since the rule comes into play. Basar bcholov is only created when both the meat and milk have a good taste. The moment either of them is ,the mixture is not called basar bcholov, as is certainly the case when the milk and meat first mix with the bitter ashes (see Aruch haShulchan Y.D. 87 s.k. 33 for full explanation). In the case of goat milk soap, the caustic used in its production certainly qualifies
to make the mixture a . The only point one might note is that in the case of the Maharil the milk (and meat) were made bitter before they were combined. In the case of milk soap, perhaps the tallow and milk were mixed before the caustic was added to turn them into soap? Would a that took place after the milk and meat were cooked together suffice to obviate the Issur of basar bcholov? Most prohibited items that attain a become permitted because they are not normally eaten that way. The problem with basar bcholov is that it is assur bhanah, and the Rambam (" ' " ' )ruled that one may not derive even an abnormal benefit from them. In our case, one could argue that foul tasting basar bcholov soap remains a prohibited item, a position that the Kreisi (Y.D. 87 s.k. 4) seems to take. On the other hand, most authorities noted that it is universally accepted in halacha that basar bcholov is subject to the rules of , and that basar bcholov that is no longer edible is no longer considered baar bcholov at all. Soap is the quintessential , so milk soap would therefore be permitted for use even if the occurred subsequent to their being cooked together. While the points noted above may be of halachic interest, the process actually used to produce milk soap obviates the concern entirely. Milk does not mix with fat, and is never added directly to it. Rather, the milk and caustic are combined to create an alkali slurry, and it is this very mixture that is added to the fat. Everyone agreed that foul-tasting milk cannot create basar bcholov, hence milk soap may be used without any fear of transgressing the prohibition of basar bcholov. Milk, however, is not the only ingredient added to soap that may cause a halachic concern. Oatmeal has been used to treat skin diseases since the time of Pliny, and colloidal oatmeal has been developed as its modern successor. In their never ending quest to improve soap, cosmeticians have created oatmeal soap, which some argue should not be used on Pesach. Although halacha tells us that that one may own and derive benefit from chometz that is not fit to be eaten by a dog a status surely met by soap others argued that a stringency may be appropriate according to the biur halacha quoted above who recommended against using non-kosher soap. ) ( " " Kosher soap even liquid versions may, however, raise other halachic concerns. The Shulchan Aruch (O.C. 326) discussed various halachos regarding washing on Shabbos, and the Ramo (Sif 10) quoted the Shut Binyomin Zev (simon 206) who prohibited using soap on Shabbos due to concerns of Nolad (creating something new). This approach is based on the opinion of the , who compared the melting of fats on Shabbos to the prohibition of melting snow or hail in ones hands (Shabbos 51b). He argued that in both cases one is converting the solid ice (or fat) into a new water (or oil) [see O.C. 320:9]. The Ramo et. al. extended this concept to using a bar of soap, reasoning that by doing so one converts some of the solid soap into liquid lather. Others, however, have rejected this approach for several reasons. The Mishnah Brurah (326:30) quoted the in the name of the who distinguished between snow and soap. He argued that the reason "forbade the melting of snow into water was due to its similarity to the routine process of squeezing juice out of fruit. Fat and soap, on the other hand, are not designed to be liquefied, and one may therefore melt them without compunction. This also seems to be the position of the GRA ) .(" ' " " Further, one can argue that even if snow and fat are comparable, the gemorah specifically allowed one to place ice into a liquid and allow it to melt because the resulting additional liquid would not be noticeable. This would seem to be
62 |
THE DAf HAkASHRUS
SOAP
analogous to washing with soap and water, where the soap dissolves in the water )' .(" " ' " " "
Others base the Halachic concern with using soap on Shabbos on the prohibition of mmarayach smoothing. The Mishnah Brurah (326:30) quoted the Tiferes Yisroel )'(' who averred that even if soap created no concern of Nolad, it would nevertheless be prohibited to use soft (semi-solid) soap because one would invariably smooth its surface. Many poskim, however, disagree with the Tiferes Yisroel, and point out the mmarayach only applies to semi-solid creams. Todays soaps, it is argued, are hard and do not spread easily, and are therefore not subject to this concern. One additional concern noted by the Mishnah Brurah is that some types of soap tend to remove hair, an action that would be prohibited on Shabbos. From a practical perspective, the Mishnah Brurah concludes that the accepted custom is to prohibit the use of (bar) soap on Shabbos. He does not, however, address the issue of liquid soap and, indeed, many Poskim do permit its use. Liquid soap does not seem to present a concern of nolad, since one is not converting a solid into a liquid and, by definition, does not apply to liquids such as water and oil. On the other hand, Rav Moshe Feinstein (Igros Moshe O.C. 1:113) noted that many liquid soaps are more viscous that water and oil and may, indeed, be subject to concerns of mmarayach. For this reason, many have a custom to dilute liquid soap for Shabbos use in deference to Rav Moshes concern. )' (" ' While soap definitely has many uses, its production yields a very interesting and useful byproduct. The glycerol that had once been the backbone of the triglyceride does not remain an active part of the soap, and can be recovered and purified. The Swedish chemist, K. W. Scheele lived about 200 years ago, and was famous for tasting virtually every chemical he studied even poisons so it is not surprising that he tasted soap, too. When doing so, he discovered that it was not all bitter; part of it was actually sweet, and he called it the sweet principle of fat. Although Scheele made his discovery in 1779, it was left to the French chemist M. E. Chevreul, who commercialized it in 1811 and named it after the Greek word glykys, meaning sweet. [Glycerol indicating it is an alcohol and glycerin using the in suffix meaning pertaining to.] Glycerin has many applications in the food industry and thus is a kashrus issue as we shall soon discuss. Its initial commercial importance, however, was in the development of explosives. Trinitroglycerin (or, as it is commonly known, nitroglycerin) was
first synthesized by the Italian chemist Ascanio Sobrero in 1847. However, it could not be handled safely or used commercially until 1866, when Alfred Nobel developed a method of absorbing it on kieselguhr (a type of clay) creating a product he called dynamite. One of the two primary ingredients in nitroglycerin is, as its name implies, glycerin, and a huge industry developed to produce the glycerin necessary for the production of dynamite for both military and industrial applications. Glycerin was traditionally a byproduct of animal soap production and, indeed, the major suppliers of glycerin were soap companies, such as Proctor & Gamble, Lever Brothers, Colgate-Palmolive and Dial. Glycerin was, therefore, generally considered a quintessentially non-kosher product. Fortunately, kosher, commercially-viable sources of glycerin were identified. Glycerin could be obtained from vegetable oils using the same processes used to produce animal-derived glycerin, and it could also be synthesized from propylene (a petrochemical). [Glycerin can also be produced through fermentation, a process to which some countries resorted during World Wars I & II when they faced a shortage of fat.] Today, much of the glycerin on the U.S. market comes from vegetable and petrochemical processes, and is readily available as a Kosher ingredient. Indeed, Malaysia and Indonesia produce a great deal of glycerin from palm oil, virtually all of which is Kosher. Glycerin has insinuated itself into a myriad of Kosher products. It is critical to the production of emulsifiers, and is used as a sugar-free sweetener, a component in flavorings and as a humectant (something that retains moisture). Its use in the production of emulsifiers is somewhat ironic, in that it is removed from soap, which is an emulsifier, and then reengineered to become part of one. Emulsifiers allow fats and water-based ingredients to mix; we could not have mayonnaise, salad dressings, or even cakes without them. While eggs and milk are traditionally used for emulsification of cakes and mayonnaise (the word emulsifier derives from the Latin emuls to milk out), they are not suitable for all foods. Soap is an excellent emulsifier, but clearly not for food use. Scientists have therefore engineered esters called monoglycerides, similar to soap in that one end of its molecule attracts fat and the other attracts water. Indeed, its production actually starts by hydrolyzing fats, similar to soap production but with one crucial difference. Instead of using lye with its attendant bitterness to hydrolyze the triglyceride and then bind to the fatty acids, the bonds are broken by heat and pressure, yielding fatty acids and glycerin. Additional glycerin is then added to the mix (in the presence of certain catalysts), which then become attached to some of the free fatty acids, yielding new molecules called mono- and diglycerides. The mono-glyceride molecule is an emulsifier its glycerin end attracts water and its fatty acid end attracts fat. We now have a molecule that functions as soap but without the bitter taste. [Sorbitol, another sugar alcohol, can also be used to produce molecules with similar products e.g., polysorbates which function in much the same way.] Another use of glycerin is as a sweetener. Glycerin is about half as sweet as sugar, but since it is an alcohol, it is metabolized differently, and also does not support the growth of bacteria that cause tooth decay (caries). The U.S. government therefore allows products sweetened with it to be labeled sugar free. Glycerin also serves as a humectant, keeping foods soft and moist. It can be found in candies, cookies, toothpastes, mouthwash and cough syrups. It is also one of the ingredients in chewing gum that pose significant kashrus concerns. One must, however, be careful with foods sweetened this way. Glycerin actually contains more calories than sugar and, if too much is consumed, functions as a laxative. Glycerin is also used to soften strong flavors, and is commonly added
THE DAf HAkASHRUS |
63
V Ek A SH E R
say 5 minutes, he has begun the cooking under his own power rendering the food as bishul akum. Rav Belsky said that the cutoff temperature as to what is considered too cool (and the Jews original lighting is said to have finished) is when the oven is no longer at a point that it can cook, which is about 170 degrees Fahrenheit. He further said that this temperature is measured by the air in the oven not the heat of the walls, which will be much higher. hindqUaRteR nikkUR Submitted by: Rabbi Yaakov D. Lach [The hindquarters of animals are not used in the USA for kosher production. This is because they contain the prohibited chailev fat, the gid hanashe (sciatic nerve), and gid hachitzon (femoral nerve). The cheilev is an issur kares and therefore treated very seriously. The issue of the prohibited gidin is a Rabbinic one (since the part of the gid hanashe that is Biblically prohibited is easily removed), yet this too is a factor, since we remove every last innervation of these nerves into the meat, a tedious process that requires great skill and yiras shomayim.] Rabbi Belsky permits the use of the hindquarters of a wild animal (such as deer). The chailev is permitted, being that it is a chaya. The prohibited gidin apply to a chaya as well, and the Gemara, Rishonim, and early nikur Sefarim clearly say that there is no difference between a behaima and chaya with regards to the laws of nikkur. Still, Rabbi Belsky permits nikkur of the gidin to be done on a chaya without removing every trace of innervation the way we do by an animal. The reason is that he feels that the current practice by animals is the result of chumras that have evolved over the years, and are not part of the original regimen that existed in the times of the Gemara and Rishonim. Therefore, while these practices are binding and obligatory, this is only so with regard to animals, whose nikkur was commonplace. With regard to wild animals, the original tradition remains intact, and a simple nikkur of the main nerves and their primary innervations into the meat is sufficient. Rav Belsky relates that a menaker in Eretz Yisroel {who was the rosh haminakrim in Poland before the war with years of experience being menaker deer related to him that he recalls being menaker deer in Europe, and he did everything the same as what Rav Belsky described except that Rav Belsky had added some extra chumros.} hOt smOked fish Submitted by: Rabbi Chaim Goldberg
Rav Belsky is of the strong opinion that even though theoretically hot smoking is included in the heter of ishun brought in YD 113, the current process of hot smoking is not the same as that of the Gemarah, as the cooking and the smoking elements of the present day process are not the same (the heat is not from the smoke, rather from a separate cooking element). Practically, this is not a concern on most smoked fish as they are edible after the brine step, before the cold smoking step (even if the cold smoking is not separate from the hot smoking process but one continuous process). Each fish and manufacturer should be evaluated separately, by having samples before and after hot smoking tasted by someone familiar with fish. [To see Rav Belskys teshuvah on this topic, see http://bit.ly/OU-A-142.] menhaden Oil Submitted by: Rabbi Zushe Blech The menhaden is a small, oily fish from which a refined fish oil is produced. The oil is commonly used in Europe to produce margarine and other products, and has made some inroads in the United States due to its purported health benefits. Due to the small size of the fish, they are not processed by hand; rather, they are caught in large nets and dumped into cookers for processing. While the menhaden is a kosher species of fish, it is impossible to check each fish being processed to ensure that non-kosher by-catch was not caught at the same time. Rav Belsky ruled that if the company has systems in place to prevent any significant amount of by-catch, then one may use such oil, since any possible contamination would be very batul. nOn-daiRy CReameR Submitted by: Rabbi Yosef Wagner I once asked Rav Belsky if someone can be mevatel milk bshishim in ones coffee during the six hour waiting period after eating meat. [My application of this is to some non-dairy creamers that have a little bit of milk in them and since we do not say chanan on heter, shishim is only needed against the little milk in the non-dairy creamer.] He said yes, as the minhag is on the gavra to wait six hours, and thus would not violate ein mivatlin issur lechatchila. OniOns in heRRinG Submitted by: Rabbi Yissachar Dov Krakowski Twice I witnessed Rav Belsky take a fork of onions from pickled herring and make a hoadomo. Rav Belsky explained that since we follow the Mishnah Berurahs ruling (205:5) that onions are shehakol both when they are raw and when they are cooked, the only time one may make a hoadoma on them is
when they are kavush (pickled). He explained that he is therefore very much mechavev the (pickled) herring onions {because it gives him the opportunity to show when one can make a haadoma on onions}. papeR tOwels Submitted by: Rabbi Moshe Dovid Lebovitz Rav Belsky said that there is no starch problem with paper towels and one may place food directly on the paper towels. There is no chumrah, issur, or minhag to prevent a drop of kitniyos from falling into food. The Shulchan Aruch (O.C. 453:1) says that one can use a lamp filled with kitniyos-based oil even though it is certain that some of the kitniyos will be sprayed into the food. More so, in the case of the paper towels there is no certainty at all of any of it seeping into the food. It has never been confirmed that even a molecule of starch from the paper towel leaked into food. The kitniyos starch is so firmly bonded to the paper towel that even an iodine test would not reveal its presence. RemOte liGhtinG & timeRs Submitted by: Rabbi Eli Gersten Some factories are located in remote areas and it is difficult for Mashgichim to visit frequently or on short notice. If such a factory requires bishul Yisroel, it may be impossible to send a Mashgiach every time the boiler needs to be turned on. Rav Belsky said that it is acceptable to have the Mashgiach turn on the boiler remotely, from his cell phone, by dialing in a special code. Of course, a system would need to be set up that ensures that this is the only method for turning on the boiler. Also if the Mashgiach sets a timer in the evening to turn on the fire the next morning this is also acceptable. However, Rav Belsky only allows timers for a one time use but not if they turn on the oven again and again, because then the maaseh Yisroel is lost. Rav Belsky said that a timer for its first use is a real maaseh, similar to aisho mishum chitzo, and is not just a ,but subsequent uses are only a . siGht Glass Submitted by: Rabbi Dovid Cohen The Ashkenazic custom is that glass cannot be kashered, but Rav Belsky has said that nonetheless one may kasher metal equipment which contains a sight glass. He bases this decision on a combination of two factors. Firstly, the sight glass occupies a relatively small part of the overall equipment such that even if the sight glass is considered to not have been kashered it is akin to a non-kosher utensil which is asui lhishtamesh bshefah (where many allow its use without kashering,
64 |
THE DAf HAkASHRUS
especially if the equipment is aino ben yomo). Secondly, the fact that Darchei Moshe allows the bdieved consumption of food made on glass which had been kashered indicates that the aforementioned custom is merely a chumrah.
V Ek A SH E R
taRtaRiC aCid Submitted by: Rabbi Chaim Meir Wagshal The OU generally approves tartaric acid (a derivative of wine) as a Group 1 and assumes that since it is fully dried out there is no longer an issur of stam yayin. However, Rav Belsky agreed that tartaric acid from Israel is not permitted without proper hashgachah because of concerns of shemittah, tevel, arlah, etc. The difference between stam yayin and other issurim is that the issur of stam yayin does not apply if the item is (so dried out that it is) no longer wine, but other issurim remain. theRmOses and styROfOam CUps Submitted by: Rabbi Eliyahu Ferrell Thermoses and Styrofoam cups are designed to preserve heat. Since the leniencies associated with a keli sheni stem from the cooling effect of the walls of the vessel, Rav Belsky has stated that Thermoses and Styrofoam cups do not have the status of a keli sheni when receiving food and beverages from a keli rishon.
hours, B will watch for 8 hours, and C will watch for 10 hours, it should be arranged ahead of time that each will receive a preset amount for the inconvenience of being away from home. The amounts that they receive need not be the same. It would even be permissible to compensate mashgiach A - $180, mashgiach B - $240 and mashgiach C - $300, so long as it is clear that these amounts are not contingent on how many hours any of the mashgichim actually work. If one mashgiach ends up covering for another and thereby working more hours, he will still be paid the same amount and likewise for the mashgiach who worked less. If the mashgiach who did not work his full hours wants to make it up to the mashgiach that covered for him, he may do so as a gift.
SECHAR
Occasionally, mashgichim are called upon to make surprise visits to companies on Shabbos.If this entails spending Shabbos at a hotel away from home then the above leniency would apply, and a preset amount should be arranged. However, if the mashgiach can walk from his home to the business on Shabbos, then this would not apply. In such a case he can be paid bhavlaah. He would get paid a fixed amount for the visit which must include erev Shabbos preparations (e.g. reviewing the schedule A and B). However, except for a dvar mitzvah a mashgiach may never be paid an hourly wage for Shabbos.
S U k kA H
Schach mats are notorious for blowing off of sukkos. According to many Poskim4, if one suspects that their schach can be blown Who placed the mats on top of the sukkah? off by a ruach mitzuya (an ordinary wind), then it is pasul. Even schach that wont blow Shulchan Aruch (O.C. 635:1) says that a off with a ruach mitzuya will often shift and sukkah built by a non-Jew is kasher, proleave gaps that can vided that it was either invalidate the built for shade. This it is therefOre entire sukkah or that requires that the nonincumbent On us tO Jew understands why ensure that the sukkOs area of the sukkah. Therefore, the schach he is putting up the meet all the halachic should be tied down. schach (i.e. that it will requirements However, one should be used as a temponot tie the schach rary dwelling place). with a davar hapasul lschach min haTorah, If he has no idea what the purpose of a suksuch as metal wire or clamps, but rather they kah is, it is likely he is building it simply as should use cotton or hemp string5 (i.e. grows part of his job and not to provide shade and from the ground, not wool or synthetic) or therefore it is pasul. Furthermore, even if he place heavy 2X4 on top of the schach to knows that he is building a sukkah for shade, weigh it down. still the sukkah is not kasher lichatchila unless 3 it is placed by a Yisrael lishaym mitzvah . It is impossible to enumerate all the halachos Therefore, if the schach was put up by a nonof Sukkos in one article, but suffice it to say Jew, the Yisroel should lift up the schach and that if anyone has any uncertainty as to the place it back down. kashrus of their sukkah, they should please contact the office. Maamid: How is the schach supported?
" " continued from page 56 " , , , " " ", '. , , , " , . " , ' , "
, , , " ' , , , , , . " " , " , " ', . '' '': , '' ,, .
One should not rest schach directly on metal or plastic (maamid bdavar hapasul lschach), but rather on wooden beams placed on top of the metal poles (maamid dmaamid). If ones mats are woven with plastic wire, they must make sure that the schach is placed perpendicular to the wooden beams; otherwise the stalks are supported exclusively by the plastic wire. Can one tie their schach mats to the sukkah with string?
________________________________
1. See Mishna Berurah 630:4 as to when this is a psul lichatchila and when it is a psul even bdieved 2. See Yechaveh Daas 3:46 for sources that any amount of movement will pasul. 3. Mishna Berurah 636:4 4. See Shevet Halevi 10:93 and Btzeil Hachachma 5:43 5. Biur Halachah 630 s.v. Kol says that one can be maamid schach with something which is only pasul for schach midirabanan. Mishna Berurah 629:12-13 writes that even ropes made from linen are only pasul for schach midrabbanan, and certainly those made from cotton or hemp. However, one may not use synthetic string since this is pasul minhaTorah for schach. Also see Yechaveh Daas I:64
THE DAf HAkASHRUS |
65
e DVDs are rated OU Thes
rom the experts... Learn f

GET AN ENTERTAINING KOSHER EDUCATION
in the convenience of your home, synagogue or school with these five invaluable DVDs:
KOSHER KIDZ Takes children on an engaging tour through the basics of kosher certification THE KOSHER FISH PRIMER Show kosher consumers the ins and outs of identifying kosher fish KOSHER BIRDS: WHO ARE THEY? Show kosher consumers the ins and outs of identifying
kosher birds
how the laws of kashrut interface with the biology of animals and kosher meat preparation expertly in the fine art of ensuring that their vegetables are kosher.
KOSHER MEAT: UNEXPLORED FRONTIERS WITH RABBI YISROEL BELSKY Elucidates INSECT-FREE: A GUIDE TO HOME VEGETABLE INSPECTION in which viewers are guided WHATS WRONG WITH THIS CHICKEN A practical guide to identifying the kashrus red-flags
related to raw chicken.
OU Kosher Live & in Person!!
Distribution of these educational DVDs serves as one of the many ways that OU Kosher is reaching out to the public. OU Koshers educational programs also include the popular OU Kosher Coming project, which sends the OUs Rabbinic Coordinators to schools, synagogues, college campuses and communities enlightening thousands with their vast knowledge of halacha and technology.
To purchase the NEW Insect Free DVD at $10 or the entire set at $35, or to request an OU Kosher Coming program for your school, synagogue or community - contact [email protected].
66 | THE DAf HAkASHRUS
THE DAf HAkASHRUS |
67
Glycerin is also used to soften strong flavors, and is commonly added to whisky in small amounts that are always batul. This property is of halachic interest in that while it does affect the flavor of the mixture, the Nodah bYehuda (Y.D. 2:56) and Rav Moshe Feinstein (Igros Moshe Y.D. 1:62) both argued that it is not considered an because its purpose is to modify an existing flavor and not to impart one of its own.
SOAP
) (" All food ingredients are divided into three categories those that are not kosher, those whose kosher status must be verified, and those that may assumed to be inherently kosher. Whether one refers to the latter category as Group 1, GRAK (Generally Recognized as Kosher), or some other moniker, determining which items fall under its purview is one of the most delicate tasks in kosher certification. Indeed, the production of glycerin serves as an excellent illustration of the ever-changing world of food chemistry and its effect on Group 1 ingredients. Glycerin is definitely not a Group 1 ingredient. Its traditional raw material is non-kosher animal fat, and even though a substantial amount of glycerin is produced from kosher sources, one must be vigilant in verifying its kosher provenance and status. Many other commonly used ingredients, however, have historically qualified as a Group 1 items, including one called propylene glycol. Propylene glycol is a sweet, viscous chemical used as a carrier in flavors, as a humectant and a sweetener in shredded coconut and, somewhat ironically, when used in larger concentrations functions as a bittering agent. It had traditionally been produced exclusively from propylene which, in turn, is derived from petroleum and was even considered inherently kosher for Passover. It earned this status because it satisfied the following Group 1 definition: It was an ingredient that the worlds food chemists had not yet figured out a way to produce as non-kosher on a commercially viable basis. The problem, however, is that this definition highlights three caveats: food chemists. Chemistry evolves, and food scientists are a notoriously resourceful bunch. not yet figured out. Just because an ingredient had never been produced in a non-kosher manner does not guarantee that it never will be. commercially viable basis. On the other hand, just because something can be produced in a non-kosher manner does not mean that it is commercially available that way. The world of food chemistry is not static. An ingredient may have originally been derived from a non-kosher source, but may nevertheless qualify as Group 1 because the techniques of its modern production are always kosher. A good example would be the amino acid, taurine, originally extracted from ox bile (Taurus in Latin in Aramaic). While such an extraction may make sense in a laboratory, it is prohibitively expensive on a commercial scale. Scientists (resourceful as always) therefore developed a process of synthesizing taurine from non-animal and inherently kosher ingredients. Even though it theoretically could be produced from a non-Kosher source, in practice it never is and, indeed, it is considered a Group 1 ingredient. Conversely, an ingredient that historically had always been produced as kosher may find itself the subject of a new, non-kosher method of preparation. Should this new process become common, an ingredient that had heretofore been considered inherently Kosher may no longer be. The culprit in this change is glycerin, and for a very interesting reason. The price and availability of petroleum is a constant source of
concern, and efforts have been expended on a number of fronts to reduce its consumption. One of these approaches has been the production of biodiesel. Diesel engines are very flexible, and can run on a variety of fuels including vegetable oil. Indeed, some intrepid engineers have modified engines to run on recycled vegetable oil (they claim that their cars smell like french fries). Generally, however, the structure of the triglyceride molecule causes vegetable oil to be too viscous for an engine to function properly. Scientists have therefore developed the technology to separate the fatty acids from the glycerol, and then couple each individual fatty acid to methanol to create a methyl ester. These methyl esters are called biodiesel, and can be blended with conventional diesel to reduce our dependence on petroleum. Just as in the case of soap production, the glycerol is not functional in the new product, and must be disposed of as a byproduct. Biodiesel can be produced from virtually any fat. Under normal circumstances, vegetable oil is too expensive to be used for this purpose, although a cottage industry had sprung up to convert spent cooking oil from fast food operations and from other users of large amounts of frying fat into this fuel. While such recovered oil and the glycerin derived from it is not kosher, it posed no particular concern to the kosher industry because non-Kosher glycerin had always been around anyway. Anyone needing Kosher glycerin would obtain a kosher-certified synthetic or vegetable-based version. The potential kosher problem stems from government intervention. In their zeal to reduce petroleum dependence, governments around the world began offering subsidies to biodiesel manufacturers that allow them to produce their material from vegetable oil at a competitive price. This vastly increased the supply of glycerin, which served to undermine its price. While lower prices may sound good, it has had two significant effects on the Kosher industry. First, the only manufacturer of synthetic glycerin in the United States was forced to suspend operations. It was faced with the rising cost of its raw material (petroleum) and the falling value of the glycerin it produced. Manufacturers of items such as toothpaste and mouthwash had to find alternatives, and some switched to animal based material. In addition, synthetic glycerin was inherently kosher for Passover, whereas the Passover status of vegetable glycerin depends on the oil from which it is derived. Second, scientists began looking for new outlets for this sudden glut of glycerin and found one propylene glycol. Technology was developed to convert glycerin into propylene glycol on a commercially viable basis and, indeed, several facilities in the United States have begun or are planning to start such productions. From a kashrus perspective, it was a perfect storm, serving to potentially undermine the erstwhile inherently kosher status of propylene glycol. The cost of the traditional propylene raw material rose in tandem with the petroleum from which it is derived, and the glut of glycerin on the market indirectly driven by the rising cost of petroleum depressed the cost of glycerin. This confluence of factors conspired to make glycerin an attractive option for the production of propylene glycol, and, thus, require us to re-examine its Group 1 status. The ultimate fate of propylene glycol is tied to the following considerations. While vegetable oil can be non-kosher, all of the large biodiesel facilities currently in operation are designed to use Kosher vegetable oil, so their glycerin byproduct is also kosher. In addition, all of the current and planned glycerin-to-propylene glycol facilities are integrated with such biodiesel facilities. Therefore, currently, we are not aware of any non-kosher propylene glycol on the market. This could change, however, and the kashrus establishment must be vigilant in monitoring propylene glycol production worldwide if this
U P pas
yisROel pROdUCts (as Of elUl 5772)
C O m p i l e d By Ra BB i eli eleff
Rabbinic Coordinator, OU Consumer Relations Administrator
the tUR (Orach Chaim, Siman 603), based upon the Talmud Yerushalmi, cites the custom
for Jews to be stringent during the Aseret Yimei Teshuva to eat exclusively Pas Yisroel bread. Even those Jews who generally do not exclusively eat Pas Yisroel are encouraged to accept this practice during the period between Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. We therefore present the list of all U Pas Yisroel products. Please note: All U P (Kosher for Passover) Matzah products (e.g. Matzah, Matzah Meal, Matzah Meal products) are Pas Yisroel, even if not listed below. Not all products on this list are available in all countries or geographic regions. The OU Poskim are of the position that breakfast cereal and wafers are considered a tavshil and not pas and, therefore, are not subject to the laws of Pas Yisroel. Products which are also Cholov Yisroel and/or Yoshon are so indicated. Items manufactured in Israel are noted with an asterisk* and are all Yoshon. Food service establishments such as restaurants and caterers are noted with a (FSE).
COmpany/BRand A. Loacker* Abadi Bakery* Acme [Albertsons] (FSE) Acme [Albertsons] (FSE) Acme [Albertsons] (FSE) Aladdin Bakers Almondina* Almost Dairy Amnons Kosher Pizza Angels Bakery* Bag N Save Bagel City Bagels-N-More Barrys Bakery Barth* Bell Bon Appetito Brickfire Bakery Brooklyn Bagel Bubbas and Novelty Kosher Pastries Burry Foodservice Caf 11 [FSE] Canada Bread Chefs Quality Circa-NY Midtown (FSE) Continental Pastry Daily Pita Dakota Brands Damascus Davids Cookies Davidovitz* Delacre* Dr. Praegers
pROdUCt type All products are pas yisROel All items Clifton, NJ all fresh baked products Milltown, NJ all fresh baked products Narberth, PA all fresh baked products Bagels, pizza bagels, rolls, breads, pitas, baguettes, wraps, breadstick (when bearing a stamp with pas yisROel sticker on the label) with special label stating U and pas yisROel Cheese Cake Frozen Pizza (ChOlOv yisROel) All products (when bearing an U ) Bread, rolls, buns Challah, challah rolls (yOshOn) Challah, challah rolls (yOshOn) Caf and French Twists (when pas yisRael is written on the label) Crackers Bialys (with special Hebrew packaging only) [Only available in Israel] Cookies and Pastries (when pas yisROel written on the label) Plain Sliced Mini Bagels Frozen, Poppy, Sesame Bagels (With special Hebrew packaging only) [Only available in Israel] All baked goods (yOshOn) Mini Bagel Plain, Cinnamon Raisin Mini Bagels, Blueberry Mini Bagels, Wrapped Plain Bagel, Wrapped Cinnamon Raisin Bagel, Wrapped Blueberry Bagel Breads, Bagels, Wraps Mini Bagel Plain, Mini Bagel Cinnamon Raisin, Mini Bagel Blueberry, Plain Bagel, Cinnamon Raisin Bagel, Blueberry Bagel Pita bread (when pas yisROel is written on the label) Pizza (ChOlOv yisROel) and breads Cakes and Cookies All pita bread Bagels, rolls Must state pas yisroel on package Hamentashen (only when labled as Pareve and Pas Yisroel) All Products (when bearing an U symbol) Cookies Fishies, fish sticks, fish cakes, and Pizza Bagels
RC R Rockove R Rabinowitz R Steinberg R Steinberg R Steinberg R Eleff R Rockove R Rockove R Indich R Rabinowitz R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Bendelstein R Rabinowitz R Nosenchuk R Bendelstein R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Steinberg R Nosenchuk R Paretzky R Schreier R Paretzky R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Bendelstein R Bendelstein R Rabinowitz R Rabinowitz R Bistricer
THE DAf HAkASHRUS |
69
PA S Y I S R O E L
Edwards & Sons* Einat* Elite* Elsas Story* Empire Ener-G* Eskal Fischer Brothers & Leslie (FSE) Friedmans Gefen Glutino* Gold Star Golden Star Grandpas Old Southern Coffee Cake Grandpas Coffee Cake Grandpas Gourmet Biscotti Grandpas International Bakery Guiltless Gourmet Hadar* Haddar Hafners Healthy Palate/Chef Martini Hema* Hy-Vee J&P Jakes Bakes Jeff Nathan Jewel-Osco [Albertsons] (FSE) Jewel-Osco [Albertsons] (FSE) Josefs Organic Kedem Keefe Kitchen Kem Kem Kemach Food Products Ki Tov Kineret Kitov LEsti Desserts Lakewood Kollel Lilys Bakeshop M&M Kosher Bakery (FSE) Maadanot* Macabee Manischewitz Co. Matamim Maple Leaf Bakery Matzot Carmel * Max and Harry Mehadrin Bakery Mendelsons Pizza
Breadcrumbs, croutons Breadcrumbs, croutons Biscuits Cookies, crackers, pastries (not ChOlOv yisROel) Pizza (ChOlOv yisROel); Gluten-free pretzels and crackers Gluten-free cakes Challah, challah rolls, chicken nuggets, fried breast meat All products (when pas yisROel is written on the label) Crackers, cookies, matzoh (matzoh is yOshOn) Gluten free pretzels, crackers Granola Cookies and Pastries (when pas yisROel written on the label) All baked items All coffee cakes Biscotti Breads Wraps Assorted biscuits All products Pastry shells w/ U and Rabbi signature Eggplant parmesan (breadcrumbs are pas yisROel) Crackers Egg Bagels, Plain Bagels, Cinnamon Raisin Bagels, Blueberry Bagels, Onion Bagels, Bakery Style Onion Bagels, Apple Cinnamon Refrigerated Bagel, Honey Wheat Bakery Style Bagel Pita bread All products (when pas yisROel is written on the label) Panko Bread Crumbs Evanston, IL bread and kosher cakes Highland Park, IL bread and kosher cakes All products Cookies, Cereal bars, Biscuits, Crackers Plain Bagels, Cinnamon Raisin Bagels Crackers Cookies, (yOshOn when stated on package), Crackers (when pas yisROel is written on the label) French Twists Cakes, Rugalach All products Cakes and pastries (also yOshOn) All products (when pas yisROel is written on the label) All products Pita, Baklava, and Lady Fingers Bourekas, malawah, pizza squares Pizza (ChOlOv yisROel), Pizza Bagel (ChOlOv yisROel), Breaded Eggplant (yOshOn), Breaded Mushrooms (yOshOn), Mozzarella Sticks (ChOlOv yisROel, yOshOn) Tam tams (yOshOn), italian coating crumbs (yOshOn) All products Safeway Natures Blend Plain Mini Bagel, Mini Bagels Matzah Cakes and Cookies Breads, Cookies and Pastries Pizza (ChOlOv yisROel) and breads
R Rabinowitz R Rabinowitz R Rabinowitz R Rabinowitz R Mandel R Rabinowitz R Rabinowitz R Mandel R Bendelstein R Singer R Rabinowitz R Rabinowitz R Bendelstein R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Singer R Rabinowitz R Gutterman R Rockove R Gold R Rabinowitz R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Bendelstein R Singer R Steinberg R Steinberg R Nosenchuk R Singer R Nosenchuk R Coleman R Coleman R Bendelstein R Bendelstein R Gutterman R Bendelstein R Bendelstein R Bendelstein R Bistricer R Rabinowitz R Bistricer R Singer R Gutterman R Nosenchuk R Rabinowitz R Bistricer R Bendelstein R Schreier
70 |
THE DAf HAkASHRUS
PA S Y I S R O E L
Mendys (FSE) Mezonos Maven Milk N Honey (FSE) Mishpacha Moishys Mount Sinai Hospital (FSE) Mountain Fruit Mr. Broadway (FSE) Natural Ovens
Pita, All bread except for hamburger & hot dog buns All products Pizza and Breads All products Exclusively pas yisROel rolls, cookies, cakes, breads Products bearing an U symbol All products (when pas yisROel is written on the label) All except for Hot Dog and Hamburger Buns 100% Whole Grain Bread, Hunger Filler Bread, Multi-Grain Bread, Oat Nut Crunch Bread, Oatmeal Bread, Organic Whole Grain & Flax Bread, Original Carb Consc Bread, Right Wheat Bread, Sunny Millet Bread All Items (when bearing an U symbol) Breads & Bagels All Baked Items In sealed packages from the factory are All Pareve and pas yisROel All products (ChOlOv yisROel, yOshOn) All product (ChOlOv yisROel, yOshOn) Chicken Breast Nuggets All products Plain Bagel, Cinnamon Raisin Bagel, Blueberry Bagel, Everything Bagel, Sesame Bagel, Plain Sandwich Bagel, Park Avenue Plain Mini Bagels, Park Avenue Cinnamon Raisin Mini Bagels, Park Avenue Blueberry Mini Bagels , Plain Par-Baked Hot Stuff Bagel, Cinnamon Raisin Par-Baked Hot Stuff Bagel All products Hamentashen (only when labled as Pareve and pas yisROel) Pita bread Croutons Croutons Assorted cakes, cookies, rugalach All Products Hamentashen (only when labled as Pareve and pas yisROel), cookies, soup nuts Bread, rolls, buns Bread (when pas yisROel is written on the label) Biscuits Croutons All products (when pas yisROel is written on the label) Challahs and assorted bread products (only when labeled Pareve and pas yisROel) Sugar cookies Exclusively pas yisROel rolls, cookies, cakes, breads All products (when pas yisROel is written on the label) All products (when pas yisROel is written on the label) Assorted cookies and cakes Uncle Moishy Frozen Pizza Breads & cakes (yOshOn) Baklava and pastry shells/cups (when marked pas yisROel)
R Schreier R Bendelstein R Schreier R Singer R Bendelstein R Indich R Bendelstein R Schreier
R Jenkins R Rabinowitz R Nosenchuk R Scheiner R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Rabinowitz R Schreier
Neeman Bakery* Neris Noble Ingredients Ltd/Michel Cluizel USA Novelty Bakery Novelty Kosher Pastry Of Tov* Olympic Pita (FSE) Original Bagel Company
R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Rabinowitz R Bendelstein R Bendelstein R Rabinowitz R Rabinowitz R Paretzky R Rabinowitz R Bendelstein R Nosenchuk R Bistricer R Rabinowitz R Singer R Bendelstein R Bendelstein R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Bendelstein R Bendelstein R Rabinowitz R Klarberg R Paretzky R Bistricer
Orion Osem* Ostreichers Pita Express Quality Food Industries* Raft Foods* Reisman Bros. Bakery Renaissance Hotel Jerusalem* (FSE) Rokeach Roma Royal Bakery House Sabba* Savion Shapiros Shoprite Simply Perfect Smilowitz Srulis Super 13 Tavor* Teelah Tel Aviv Kosher Bakery (Chicago) (FSE) The Fillo Factory The Old City Caf (Upscale Foods) Tovli V.I.P. Village Crown Catering (FSE) Weins Yarden* Yumis Zaatar
Pizza (ChOlOv yisROel, yOshOn when stated on label); Burrito [ChOlOv yisROel (where applicable), yOshOn when stated on label]; Apple Strudel (yOshOn when stated on label) R Klarberg Blintzes, pizza, knishes (frozen packaged) Bread crumbs Breads and Cakes All products (when pas yisROel is written on the label) Assorted cookies All products (when pas yisROel is written on the label) Herb Pizza R Gold R Singer R Schreier R Bendelstein R Rabinowitz R Bendelstein R Nosenchuk
THE DAf HAkASHRUS |
71
when is BishUl yisROel Really nOt BishUl yisROel?

R aB B i C h a im G Old B eRG
RC Fish, Potato Products, Group Leader
lets Use the following hypothetical (but realistic) situation.
Chezky Heimish, a fellow with many years of experience in food distribution, was about to realize his dream of being his own boss. After working long hours making other people wealthy, Mr. Heimish built up his connections in supermarkets and caterers and was prepared to launch his own brand, Heimish House. His first product would be Heimish House Hashbrowns, using the same family-owned recipe the good folks at his manufacturer (Patricks Precooked Potatoes) use for all their private labels. Considering the high standards of the proposed client base, Mr. Heimish contacts OU kosher and asks that the Hashbrowns be made with a special Bishul Yisroel production, just like Heimish Houses competitors. Whether or not this product is subject to Bishul Akum restrictions would depend on whether this food is considered oleh al shulchan melachim meaning a food that is served at a royal banquet. While it is not clear that the Hashbrowns are indeed oleh al shulchan melachim, Reb Chezky wants to satisfy those consumers who hold that the Hashbrowns are oleh al shulchan melachim and are, therefore, subject to the prohibitions of Bishul Akum. Chezkys request is, therefore, perfectly reasonable. Upon analyzing the halachic aspects of this product, however, the OU concludes that it is not so simple to create a Bishul Yisroel frozen hashbrown product. Why? Lets find out! First of all, lets discuss the process of making a pre-cooked hashbrown potato. After being washed and peeled, the potatoes are cut into small pieces, cooked in live steam or boiling water (usually until a point when they are still not edible) and then par-fried (an industry term for partially fried) to varying degrees of almost cooked (typically 70-85% of the total cooking required). After frying, the potatoes are bagged and frozen, cased and shipped to the end users who are expected to cook the products further. Lets say we had the mashgiach light the boilers which heat the precooking water. This would not create Bishul Yisroel, as the product is likely not even cmaachal ben drusai (the minimum amount of cooking to be considered cooked) at this stage. We could have a mashgiach turn on the heating element on the fryer (usually heated by a separate electrical system involving heating fluid or coils, sometimes a gas fired burner system). You might think that the mashgiach heating the fryer would create Bishul Yisroel (as many frozen French fried product marketed as Bishul Yisroel probably are), though this is not so simple. If you have ever tasted a frozen French fry product that was thawed and not cooked further, you would be forgiven for believing the item was actually raw. The reason is that even though the product might taste almost fully edible off the production line, once it is frozen and subsequently thawed, the product becomes inedible. Even if a Jew cooked the item before it was frozen, the cooking process accomplished by the Jew is removed when the positive effect of the cooking (undone by freezing) is gone. Yad Efrayim [Rav Ephraim Zalman Margolis] (Y.D. 113:12) cites Avkas Rochel [Rav Yosef Karo] that if a cooked product is subsequently dried (and it seems that this reasoning can be applied to any form of undoing the original Bishul) and can no longer be
eaten without recooking, the original cooking is undone. While we normally apply this as a reason to permit a product cooked by a non-Jew, dehydrated, and subsequently recooked by a Jew, the same would apply on the other end. As such a Bishul Yisroel fried and frozen potato product should be rendered raw (halachicly) by being frozen and no longer being edible based on its original cooking. As such, those who hold that fried potatoes are oleh al shulchan melochim should only allow frozen potato products to be cooked by a Jew, despite the Bishul Yisroel claim on the label. This same concern can be applied to other products which are cooked and subsequently have the cooking undone. Some popular examples might include precooked rice and pasta (where the drying process could be considered baking and not just dehydrating). Other frozen products which retain their cooked status and just need to be heated up might not share the same status. For example, frozen waffles taste cooked when defrosted, though they are intended to have the baking finished by the end user. In this case, the cooking done by the Jew is not undone by the freezing process. The moral of the story is: just because the Jew was involved in the cooking process does not mean the end product is Bishul Yisroel. Those who consider fried potato products (or any other item which requires cooking to become reasonably edible) to be oleh al shulchan melochim should always make sure that the post-freezing cooking is done by a Jew regardless of what it says on the packaging. The author welcomes all feedback to the kashrus issue he has raised at [email protected].
ingredient is to retain its Group 1 status. Its Passover Group 1 status may pose more of a concern, since much of the oil used for biodiesel production is considered kitniyos. On the other hand, many might argue that glycerin so derived would still be suitable for Passover as a kitniyos shenishtanah (changed kitniyos).
SOAP
Soap may originally have been designed to clean, but its chemistry and byproducts have had an inordinate effect on the world in which we live and the foods that we eat. Ultimately, of course, we use Mitzvos to clean our neshomos, and by learning the halachos that pertain to soap we can merit fulfillment of "s promise to Yeshayahu (1:18), if your sins are like red wool they will be whitened like the snow. ______________________________________
1
The prohibition of basar bcholov does not extend to the meat (or fat) of non-Kosher species of animals. As such, soap made from lard (pig fat) would not pose a concern. It is interesting to note that many Rishonim )'' " ' " ' " (" ' "are of the opinion that non-Kosher beef (nveilos and treifos) is also excluded from this prohibition, obviating concerns of basar bcholov with soap. Other authorities ) ('' " " ; ' " rule that kosher-species meat is always subject to the rules of basar bcholov, and the Halachic consensus is to be stringent. " ' ' " ' " ' " " ' " ' " Sobrero actually identified two important properties for his discovery. In addition to its use as a high explosive, he demonstrated that it also relaxes blood vessels, leading to a treatment for heart disease that is still valid today. Pasteurizing systems use recirculating hot water to heat product through alternating steel plates. Since the flavors of non-kosher (or dairy) products may transfer through the plates into the water and vice versa, subsequently using such a hot water system for Kosher or (pareve) productions would create a kashrus concern. One solution is to add a bittering agent to the water, ensuring that any transferred flavors would be pagum. Propylene glycol is an excellent choice for this purpose, since it is non-toxic, food grade, and bitter!
2 3 4 5
72 |
THE DAf HAkASHRUS
HARRY H. BERE N
H A R RY H . B E R E N
a piCtORial essay N HAR RY H . B E R E

Group Photos
OUTREACH
OU
ASK
OUTREACH
OU
AS K
OUTREACH
The ASK OU Interns pose in front of the Hampton Inn in Hanover, PA on their two day trip.
OU
AS K
The class of 2012 - (Centre from l to r) Rabbi Menachem Genack, Dr. Simcha Katz, Rabbi Yosef Grossman
Learning from the Experts

Visiting Mauzone Home Kosher Products, Queens, NY.
Rabbi Avraham Juravel
Nirbater Rav, Rav Aaron Teitelbaum, and Rabbi Yaakov Jakubowitz examine a Reah
Rabbi Chaim Schwartz Vaad of Queens
THE DAf HAkASHRUS |
73
Learning from the Experts

Rav Aaron Teitelbaum
Rabbi Dovid Goldstein and Rav Yehoshua Katz
Rav Hershel Schachter
Rav Moshe Vaya
Rabbi Dov Schreier
Rabbi Richard Levine
Rabbi Yoel Schonfeld
Rabbi Yaakov Luban and Rabbi Dovid Jenkins
Checking strawberries
Rabbi Genack accepting from Rav Vaya his new sefer Bedikas Hamazon. Rabbi Elefant is to their right.
74 |
THE DAf HAkASHRUS
Rabbi Moshe Perlmutter via Skype from Vail, CO
Rabbi Yaakov Jakubowitz
ASK the OU Rabbonim Session; (l-r) Rabbi Yosef Grossman, Rabbi Moshe Klarberg, Rabbi Moshe Elefant, Rabbi Nachum Rabinowitz, Rabbi Yaakov Luban
ar re a e to he n by ou rial on We writshkofo, writte n rce mate nt souor ms in the co r y Copies of the manual may be obtained at www.ou.org/oupress, and nd Ha . ta a AesTheTICALLy,roble to avoid eve ff f impor nt, p Kagano at face dium o the mely imp rta pro no one wants compen trefeeling ofough, blems thlems include at Judaica stores everywhere. s e is a but ex b volum ainful, munitie ily. These pro takes to eat bugs. Jewish law om This of p Jewish c y if not da numberar y Or thodox eqthe tlrevulsion abuse. step further -- chic uen al one hala tempor abbi & Rav, fr buse and sexu halacha prohibits eating fic and s become nti insects. pulpit r ns, domestic a the sciesive. He ha both The rub, given the rsua tininess ofnthe ith ways tio to w addic elp earch in n is and pe you find a d ms h ff s res creatures,sivehow do proble them will h xte Kagano problems is e nature of these material whic ts of these eyou gety rid eof Rabbi of these c and s s urc ith the thentahowodo in man asp ictions are spects ly familiar w book con in inate, a them? at add h b the WhAT BRAChAh DOes One ReCITe On CUTLeTs? BReADeD thorougwith them. Hispecially the rabfor example, th He presents the . , es Once e fact, OU ral failinghas theil as to Is IT PeRmIssIBLe TO GeT A hAIRCUT On eal lic to d ROsh ChODesh? the pub unsizes th again, r mo Kosher dite deta u itu educate s. He empha tanswers. al o in ates in erpassover,cular co ates for s a spirHe Just or time rating with se nd deb mAy One COPy A CD FOR PeRsOnAL Use? elab problemss and not ju cures. he the OU has coopee d cussions a an illne e for effective amifications ofpublishedisthe third ors, and s th ecis d de in the t ha Manual evidenc aspects and r edition e ofcluexperOU lachicialogues. ities. H Rabbi Moishe Dovid Lebovits, Rabbinical Administrator at for Checking of rtis in Vegetables, halachicnd civil author a number Fruitse & these d yards the d with h lachic exp 2007. According in the vineKOF-K, and author oftO Halachically Speaking series, has published selors a has hversions ofa2004 and e following the well-received a ORdeR: il to at he ates his own who to a new sefer entitled Piskei Halachah of Harav Yisroel Belsky shlita as th to all who served rabbi david bistricer, the OU Rabbinic ing work Coordinator onstr Usa: [email protected] or an engaging dem a zechus for Harav Belskys full recovery. Written in973.614.8446and p eer as general editor, many peopledcheck ion . own produce for the holien this u their $15- plus shipping lucid manner, the sefer is divided into 54 chapters ideal for weekly ecomm comfor nity maror (bitter herbs), so the day, for example, romaine lettuce m the We r ewish study isRael: Tov table. Informative and practical, of the J right now, as well as throughout the year. nachem Genack at the Shabbos and Yom057.318.4381 manual will come in handy O Me ator/CE Rabbi inistrthis scholarly work encompasses the plus shipping living and through50 NIS laws of daily ic Adm Ra bin This manual, along with those that have been published in the blast her out the year. Some timely topics includeformat | muktzeh, hilchos Available also in pdf brachos, $10Kos b, PhD OU few years on baked goods,i Hersh Weinreoil,meritus food service now in fish and t, E with Pesach, pas palter and bishul akum, summer halachos and many more. zv en Rabbi T preparation, emphasizescutive Vice Presid the commitment of the OU under the leadxe E The sefer consists of over 500 psakim from Harav Chaim |Yisroel nion THE DAf HAkASHRUS 75 ership of OU Kosher rthodox Urabbi menachem Genack and COO O CEO Belsky shlita, as well as detailed footnotes for further clarification. rabbi moshe elefant to serve the interests of the Jewish communiThese psakim, which have been reviewed by Harav Belsky, were
OU Kosher Publishes Third Edition of OU p u bL i c aT i OnS alocho Manual kfor dCheckingua tions: H , Ad ic abbi Yehosh ew boo ,R 2, 2012 e the nme and ue August rsFruits d colleagVegetables ly endo tee s ti
bles; berry and fruit inspection; dried fruits; nuts and grain; fish; and commercial checking. The booklet is copiously illustrated, including photos of the insects -- the blueberry maggot, cabbage worm, fly, lettuce aphid, spider mite, thrip, vegetable leaf miner, and spinach flea beetle. An appendix lists the limits at which the Food and Drug Administration regards food products as adulterated from infestation.
PIsKeI hALAChAh OF hARAv yIRsOeL BeLsKy shLITA
c O n s u m er q&a
kashRUs aleRt
why dOes the OU CeRtify pROdUCts that aRe inheRently kOsheR? A. If a company requests OU certification, the OU will certify the product even if it does not technically require supervision. From the company point of view, the OU is beneficial as a marketing tool which extends far beyond the Jewish kosher consumer, as many people prefer to purchase product that is inspected and certified. If the OU would refuse to certify innocuous products, this would create ill-will or tension between the OU and manufacturers, and would no doubt diminish corporate interest in kosher production. For the kosher consumer, there is an advantage as well to always purchase certified product. In theory, it is possible for any item to be prepared in a manner that renders it non-kosher. Thus, for example, the OU once discovered that a particular brand of bottled water was pasteurized on equipment used for non-kosher production. While this is a rare occurrence that hardly ever occurs, the presence of the OU symbol insures with absolute certainty that the product is kosher. Even if the possibility of a product being produced in a nonkosher manner is highly remote, the OU visits the production sites of all products bearing an OU to guarantee the kosher status. It is also true that kosher consumers do not always know what products do not require supervision, and the OU kosher symbol prevails as a mark of trust for the Jewish community. Can i tell if a pROdUCt is tRUly daiRy OR de By CheCkinG the inGRedient panel? A. If a product lists dairy ingredients on the ingredient pane, it is obviously dairy. Some common dairy ingredients are Milk, Yogurt, Cheese, Cream, Butter, Whey, Lactose, Casein, and Caeseinate. However, a product may contain a dairy ingredient that is not listed on the ingredient panel. For example, flavors may contain dairy components, but the formula of flavors is not detailed on the ingredient panel. is this fish kOsheR? It is not possible to establish the kosher status of a fish based on the fish name since fish names are not used in a precise fashion. The proper way to verify the kosher status of a fish is to check for the presence of scales on the fish. The fish is kosher if the scales can be removed without tearing the skin of the fish. what is the OUs OpiniOn ReGaRdinG nyC wateR? There are two opinions among Poskim whether or not New York City water may be used without filtration. Because this issue is a matter of dispute, we require filtration of New York City water in OU certified food service establishments.
nature valleY darK ChoColate & nut trail mix ChewY granola bars produced by General Mills, Minneapolis, MN is not certified by the Orthodox Union. Some packages mistakenly have an U on them. Corrective measures have been implemented.
ahold brand roCKY road real Premium iCe Cream, sold at Stop & Shop, is not certified by the Orthodox Union. Some containers mistakenly display the symbol. Consumers who purchased this product may return the product to Stop & Shop for a refund. Corrective actions have been implemented. atlanta bread ChoColate brownie bites produced by Bake One, Smyrna, GA is certified by the Orthodox Union as an dairy product. This product contains dairy components, as indicated on the label. Some packages were mistakenly printed with a plain U , without the D-dairy designation. The mislabeled product was primarily sold at WalMart. Corrective measures have been implemented. smarties 3 feet ofun produced by Stichler Products Inc., Reading, PA mistakenly bears an U symbol. This product is not certified by the Orthodox Union. Corrective measures have been implemented.
maZ el t Ov
to our devoted RFR in The Netherlands rabbi arYeh leib heinz and his wife on the engagement of their daughter Rina Aidel to Simcha Steinberg of Bnei Brak, Israel.
to our dedicated RFR in Winnipeg, Canada rabbi eliYohu simmonds and his wife on the engagement of their daughter Tuba to Chanan Tchernitsky. to our devoted RFR in Chicago, IL rabbi shraga Kaufman and his wife on the engagement of their son Yehuda to Gitty Zuckerman of Detroit. to our dedicated RC rabbi lennY steinberg and his wife on the engagement of his daughter Bassie to Tzvi Witkin of Brooklyn, NY.
to our dedicated RFR in Norway rabbi Joav melChior on the recent loss of his brother Eitan. to our devoted RC rabbi Yosef goldberg and family on the recent loss of his mother Gittel Bas Yosef.
cOnd O lences
ohkaurhu iuhm hkct rta lu,c of,t ojbh ouenv
the daf hakashRUs wishes all its ReadeRs and all Of klal yisROel a vcuy vnh,ju vch,f and a ouka tknu veu,n 'vcuy vba!
g wwckabu, - A YEAR OF THE DAF - wf vbav ;s


Daf Hakashrus20 10TB

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Daf Hakashrus20 10TB

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Daf Hakashrus20 10TB

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

s p e C i a l

Daf HaK 200 ashrus

a mOnthly newsletteR fOR the OU RaBBiniC field RepResentative

)( ' ' ' "

One Of Rav Belskys well-known contributions to

Published by the Orthodox Union, Eleven Broadway, New York, NY 10004

Menachem Genack Rabbinic Administrator, CEO

THE DAf HAkASHRUS

CReatinG the Best pOssiBle RelatiOnship with kashRUs aGenCies wORldwide

THE DAf HAkASHRUS |

Odd-nUmBeRed fatty aCids

ReCently an OU company applied to use an ingredient called

enzyme mOdified Cheese flavORs

aBOUt thirty years ago a fast-food chain

hOw dOes enzyme mOdified Cheese wORk?

THE DAf HAkASHRUS |

rrugk tkt h,tc tk

rrugk tkt h,tc tk

THE DAf HAkASHRUS

the 70 students came from Brooklyn, of course, and from

continued from page 59

THE DAf HAkASHRUS

with an aBUndanCe Of sOap Yirmiyahu 2:22

THE DAf HAkASHRUS |

continued from page 61

( asserted that is an that was only instituted for Yom Kippur.

THE DAf HAkASHRUS

continued from page 62

THE DAf HAkASHRUS |

continued from page 53

THE DAf HAkASHRUS

THE DAf HAkASHRUS |

e DVDs are rated OU Thes

rom the experts... Learn f

related to raw chicken.

OU Kosher Live & in Person!!

THE DAf HAkASHRUS |

yisROel pROdUCts (as Of elUl 5772)

THE DAf HAkASHRUS |

THE DAf HAkASHRUS

R Schreier R Bendelstein R Schreier R Singer R Bendelstein R Indich R Bendelstein R Schreier

R Jenkins R Rabinowitz R Nosenchuk R Scheiner R Nosenchuk R Nosenchuk R Rabinowitz R Schreier

THE DAf HAkASHRUS |

when is BishUl yisROel Really nOt BishUl yisROel?

lets Use the following hypothetical (but realistic) situation.

continued from page 68

THE DAf HAkASHRUS

a piCtORial essay N HAR RY H . B E R E

Learning from the Experts

Rabbi Avraham Juravel

Rabbi Chaim Schwartz Vaad of Queens

THE DAf HAkASHRUS |

Learning from the Experts

Rav Aaron Teitelbaum

Rabbi Dovid Goldstein and Rav Yehoshua Katz

Rav Hershel Schachter

Rav Moshe Vaya

Rabbi Dov Schreier

Rabbi Richard Levine