11.26 Talc Processing 11.26.1 Process Description1-9 Talc, which is a soft, hydrous magnesium silicate (3Mg0.4Si02.

H20), is used in a wide range of industries including the manufacture of ceramics, paints, paper, and asphalt roofing. The end-uses for talc are determined by variables such as chemical and mineralogical composition, particle size and shape, specific gravity, hardness, and color. There is no Source Classification Code (SCC) for the source category. Over 95 percent of the talc ore produced in the United States comes from open-pit mines. Mining operations usually consist of conventional drilling and blasting methods. Figure 11.26-1 is a process flow diagram for a typical domestic talc plant. Talc ore generally is hauled to the plant by truck from a nearby mine. The ore is crushed, typically in a jaw crusher, and screened. The coarse (oversize) material then is returned to the crusher. Rotary dryers may be used to dry the material. Secondary grinding is achieved with pebble mills or roller mills, producing a product that is 44 to 149 micrometers ( m) (325 to 100 mesh) in size. Some roller mills are designed to use heated air to dry the material as it is being ground. Hammer mills or steam- or compressed airpowered jet mills may be used to produce additional final products. Air classifiers (separators), generally in closed circuit with the mills, separate the material into coarse, coarse-plus-fine, and fine fractions. The coarse and coarse-plus-fine fractions then are stored as products. The fines may be concentrated using a shaking table (tabling process) to separate product containing small quantities of nickel, iron, cobalt, or other minerals and then may undergo a one-step flotation process. The resultant talc slurry is dewatered and filtered prior to passing through a flash dryer. The flash-dried product is then stored for shipment, unless it needs further grinding to meet customer specifications. The classified material also may be pelletized prior to packaging for specific applications. In the pelletizing step, processed talc is mixed with water to form a paste and then is extruded as pellets. Talc deposits mined in the southwestern United States contain organic impurities and must be calcined prior to additional processing to yield a product with uniform chemical and physical properties. Generally, a separate product will be used to produce the calcined talc. Prior to calcining, the mined ore passes through a crusher and is ground to a specified screen size. After calcining in a rotary kiln, the material passes through a rotary cooler. The cooled calcine (0 percent free water) is then either stored for shipment or further processed. Calcined talc may be mixed with dried talc from other product lines and passed through a roller mill prior to bulk shipping. 11.26.2 Emissions And Controls1-2,4-5,7-8,10-13 The primary pollutants of concern in talc processing are particulate matter (PM) and PM less than 10 m (PM-10). Particulate matter is emitted from drilling, blasting, crushing, screening, grinding, drying, calcining, classifying, materials handling and transfer operations, packaging, and storage. Although pelletizing is a wet process, PM may be emitted from the transfer and feeding of processed talc to the pelletizer. Depending on the purity of the talc ore body, PM emissions may include trace amounts of several inorganic compounds that are listed hazardous air pollutants (HAP), including arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, manganese, nickel, and phosphorus.

11/95

Mineral Products

11.26-1

TALC MINE PRODUCTION LEGEND 1 PROCESS FLOW 1 PM EMISSIONS 1 2 GASEOUS EMISSIONS CRUDE ORE DRYER (3-05-089-09, -10) CONVEYOR (3-05-089-08) 1 1 CRUSHED TALC RAIL LOADOUT (3-05-089-12) PRIMARY CRUSHER (3-05-089-11) 1 2 PLANT YARD STORAGE (3-05-089-06)

1 CRUSHED TALC STORAGE BIN LOADING (3-05-089-14) OVERSIZE ORE

SCREEN (3-05-089-17)

UNDERSIZE ORE 1 2 ROTARY CALCINER (3-05-089-31,-33) 1 2 ROTARY DRYER (3-05-089-21,-23)

2 ROTARY COOLER (3-05-089-41)

1 GRINDING (3-05-089-45) GRINDING WITH HEATED MAKEUP AIR (3-05-089-47)

1 GROUND TALC STORAGE BIN LOADING (3-05-089-49) 1 AIR CLASSIFIERS (3-05-089-50) 1 COARSE PELLETIZER (3-05-089-53) 1 2 PELLET DRYER (3-05-089-55) 1 FINAL PRODUCT STORAGE BIN LOADING (3-05-089-85) 1 2 FLASH DRYER (3-05-089-71,-73) 1 CUSTOM GRINDING (3-05-089-82) COARSE AND FINES PNEUMATIC CONVEYOR VENTING (3-05-089-58) TABLING PROCESS (3-05-089-61) CLASSIFIER FINES

FLOTATION, DEWATERING, FILTRATION

1 PACKAGING (3-05-089-88)

Figure 11.26-1. Process flow diagram for talc processing.1,4,6 (Source Classification Codes in parentheses.) 11.26-2 EMISSION FACTORS 11/95

The emissions from dryers and calciners include products of combustion, such as carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur oxides, in addition to filterable and condensible PM. Volatile organic compounds also are emitted from the drying and calcining of southwestern United States talc deposits, which generally contain organic impurities. Products of combustion and VOC may also be emitted from roller mills that use heated air and from the furnaces that provide the heated air to the mill. Emissions from talc dryers and calciners are typically controlled with fabric filters. Fabric filters also are used at some facilities to control emissions from mechanical processes such as crushing and grinding. Emission factors for emissions from talc processing are presented in Table 11.26-1. Particle size distributions for talc processing are summarized in Table 11.26-2 and are depicted graphically in Figure 11.26-2.

11/95

Mineral Products

11.26-3

Table 11.26-1. EMISSION FACTORS FOR TALC PROCESSINGa EMISSION FACTOR RATING: D Total PMb Process Natural gas-fired crude ore drying with fabric filter (SCC 3-05-089-09) Primary crushing, with fabric filterd (SCC 3-05-089-11) Crushed talc railcar loadinge (SCC 3-05-089-12) Screening, with fabric filterf (SCC 3-05-089-17) Grinding, with fabric filterg (SCC 3-05-089-45) Grinding with heated makeup air, with fabric filter (SCC 3-05-089-47) Classifying, with fabric filterj (SCC 3-05-089-50) Pellet drying, with fabric filterk (SCC 3-05-089-55) Pneumatic conveyor venting, with fabric filterm (SCC 3-05-089-58) Packaging, with fabric filtern (SCC 3-05-089-88) Crushed talc storage bin loading, with fabric filterp (SCC 3-05-089-14) Ground talc storage bin loading, with fabric filterq (SCC 3-05-089-49) Final product storage bin loading, with fabric filterp (SCC 3-05-089-85)
a c

CO2 lb/1,000 lb ND NA NA NA NA 9.3h NA ND NA NA NA NA NA

lb/1,000 lb 0.0020 0.00074 0.00049 0.0043 0.022 0.022g 0.00077 0.032 0.0018 0.0090 0.0036 0.0016 0.0035

Units are lb/1,000 lb of production unless noted. One lb/1,000 lb is equal to 1 kg/Mg. SCC = Source Classification Code. NA = not applicable. ND = no data. b Total PM includes the PM collected in the front half and the inorganic PM caught in the back half (impingers) of a Method 5 sampling train. c Reference 15. Filterable PM fraction is 60%, and condensible inorganic fraction is 40%. d References 10,13,15. e Reference 14. f References 10,13. For crushed talc ore. g References 11,13. h References 10-11. For roller mill using heated makeup air. EMISSION FACTOR RATING: E. j Reference 13. For ground talc. k Reference 13. Filterable PM fraction is 56%, and condensible inorganic fraction is 44%. EMISSION FACTOR RATING: E. m Reference 13. For final product. Units are lb/1,000 lb of material conveyed. n Reference 10,13. p Reference 13. Units are lb/1,000 lb of material loaded into storage bin. q Reference 12. Units are lb/1,000 lb of material loaded into storage bin. 11.26-4 EMISSION FACTORS 11/95

Table 11.26-2. SUMMARY OF PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS FOR TALC PROCESSINGa Cumulative Percent Less Than Diameter 91.3 78.2 56.7 47.2 38.8 21.4 3.0 0.94 0.11 100.0 99.7 99.4 97.1 80.8 43.3 7.5 2.1 0.28 0.04 99.9 97.9 86.6 73.2 56.8 24.5 7.4 3.1 0.92 0.10

Process Primary crushing (SCC 3-05-089-11)

Diameter, m 55.4 34.9 22.0 17.4 11.0 6.9 3.0 2.0 1.0

Grinding (SCC 3-05-089-45)

29.0 18.8 14.9 11.9 9.4 7.5 4.7 3.0 1.9 1.0

Storage, bagging, air classification (SCC 3-05-089-85,-88,-50)

43.9 27.7 17.4 13.8 11.0 6.9 4.4 3.0 2.0 1.0

Reference 5. Optical procedures used to determine particle size distribution, rather than inertial separators. Data are suspect. SCC = Source Classification Code.

11/95

Mineral Products

11.26-5

Figure 11.26-2. Particle size distribution for talc processing.5

References For Section 11.26 1. Calciners And Dryers In Mineral Industries - Background Information For Proposed Standards, EPA-450/3-025a, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 1985. L. A. Roe and R. H. Olson, "Talc", Industrial Rocks And Minerals, Volume I, Society Of Mining Engineers, NY, 1983. R. L. Virta, The Talc Industry - An Overview, Information Circular 9220, Bureau Of Mines, U. S. Department Of The Interior, Washington, DC, 1989. Written communication from B. Virta, Bureau Of Mines, U. S. Department Of The Interior, Washington, DC, to R. Myers, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, March 28, 1994.

2.

3.

4.

11.26-6

EMISSION FACTORS

11/95

5.

Emission Study At A Talc Crushing And Grinding Facility, Eastern Magnesia Talc Company, Johnson, Vermont, October 19-21, 1976, Report No. 76-NMM-4, Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1977. Written communication from S. Harms, Montana Talc Company, Three Forks, MT, to R. Myers, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, March 1994. R. A. James and K. Ganesan, Particulate Emissions From Montana Talc Company, Sappington, Montana, December 1986, Whitehall, MT, December 1986. Written communication from J. Parks, Barretts Minerals Incorporated, Dillon, MT, to R. Myers, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, February 23, 1995. Written communication from R. Virta, Bureau Of Mines, U. S. Department Of The Interior, Washington, DC, to R. Myers, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, February 13, 1995. Emission Test Report - Plant A, Test No. 1, July 1990, Document No. 4602-01-01, Confidential Business Information Files, Contract No 68-D2-0159, Assignment No. 2-01, Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, June 2, 1995. Emission Test Report - Plant A, Test No. 2, September 1990, Document No. 4602-01-01, Confidential Business Information Files, Contract No 68-D2-0159, Assignment No. 2-01, Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, June 2, 1995. Initial Compliance Test For Particulate Emissions, Luzenac America, Three Forks Mill, Montana Air Quality Permit #2282-02, January/February 1995, Bison Engineering, Inc., Helena, MT, April 25, 1995. Particulate Emissions Compliance Test, Luzenac America, Sappington Mill, Montana Air Quality Permit 1996-03, December 1994-March 1995, Bison Engineering, Inc., Helena, MT, March 29, 1995. Compliance Test For Particulate Emissions, Luzenac America, Three Forks Mill, Montana Air Quality Permit # 2282-02, Bison Engineering, Inc., Helena, MT, May 17, 1995. Particulate Emissions And Visible Opacity, Rotary Dryer And Crusher/Loadout, Permit 2282, Luzenac America, Yellowstone Trail, Three Forks, MT, Bison Engineering, Inc., Helena, MT, February 15 and 16, 1994.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

11/95

Mineral Products

11.26-7