NJSC
NJSC
NJSC
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
STEVEN GRAUBARD,
Defendant-Appellant.
_______________________________________
PER CURIAM
Graubard appeals from the order of the trial court issued after
Corporation.
prosecute this claim and that the damages awarded were not
defendant continued to use the Bank One credit card until May of
One Statement dated April 25, 2003, showing defendant's name and
1
This date is based on the testimony of plaintiff's
representative. However, the only competent evidence presented
at trial as to the date plaintiff acquired the credit card was a
balance transfer authorization document signed by plaintiff
indicating that the credit/balance transfer offer was "Good
until May 10, 1999."
2 A-1338-07T3
$521.97, and an outstanding balance of $25,73343. The next
summary judgment.
3 A-1338-07T3
York Times article he personally retrieved from the archives of
F.S.B."
the trial judge took judicial notice that "banks are frequently
Assets."
4 A-1338-07T3
Immediately after these rulings, plaintiff introduced,
disc (CD). Although the CD was not admitted into evidence, Fish
$17,508.
5 A-1338-07T3
The common law doctrine of judicial notice is codified in
rule.
6 A-1338-07T3
The trial court's acceptance of Wikipedia was also contrary
reasonably questioned."
2
Wikipedia Main Page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
3
Wikipedia Disclaimer Page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Wikipedia:General_disclaimer
7 A-1338-07T3
this claim from defendant. In this light, we need not, and
Reversed.
8 A-1338-07T3