Fender Design For Latest Container Ships
Fender Design For Latest Container Ships
Fender Design For Latest Container Ships
FENDERTEAM GMBH
Germany based company specialised in the design, and supply of customised Fender Solutions. well experienced employees and partners, working in the Fender Business for more than 20 years. FullService provider, starting from design stage up to supervision of Fender installation. Our exclusive partner for engineering and design; Civil engineering consultant, specialised in design of FenderSystems and waterfront structures.
TABLE OF CONTENT
1.
a. b. c. d. e.
2. 3.
a. b. c. d. e. f. g.
DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS
APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
4.
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES Timber Bushes / Truck Tyres Cylindrical Rubber Fender
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
THE 60s
First onpurpose built Container Vessel FAIRLAND 440TEU
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES Cylindrical Rubber Fender CSSFender (Cell Fender)
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
THE 70s
Container Vessel HAMBURG EXPRESS 3010TEU
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES CSSFender (Cell Fender) SXFender (Arch Fender) FEFender (Fender Elements)
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
THE 80s
Container Vessel MARCHEN MAERSK ~4300TEU
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES CSSFender (Cell Fender) FEFender (Fender Elements) SPCFender (Conical Fender)
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
THE 90s
Container Vessel SOVEREIGN MAERSK ~8300TEU
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES CSSFender (Cell Fender) Ocean Guard Foam Fender SPCFender (Conical Fender)
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
2000today
Container Vessel EMMA MAERSK ~14000TEU
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY THE 60s FAIRLAND TODAY LATEST DESIGN VESSELS
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Summary
EA = 259 kNm
EA = 3685 kNm
+ 1400 %
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PIANC2002: Guidelines for the Design of FenderSystems British Standard 6349: Maritime Structures EAU 2004: Recommendations of the Committee for Waterfront Structures DIN 18800: Design and Construction of Structural Steelwork EUROCODE 3: Design and Construction of Structural Steelwork
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS Sheet Pile Wall Combi Wall (Sheet Pile Section with Piles, or Beams) Open / SemiOpen Pile Structure Concrete deepwall (Euromax) Gravity Structures (Caissons, Concrete Blocks)
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT Design criteria: Energy Reaction Hull Pressure = 2765 kNm = <4000 kN = < 300 kN/m
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Selected Fender: 2nos. SPC1400H G2.2 E = 1416 kNm * 2 = 2832 kNm (>2765) R = 3862 kN (<4000)
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL Net Size: 12.88 m (R/HP = Net Size) Closed Box Steel Panel Type with 100mm side and 300mm top Chamfer FOS 1.4 onnon permanent loads, further capacity check acc. to DIN 18800 Line Loads vs. Flat Contact Lower or Upper Contact, Panel/Vessel Flare Angle of Vessel Steel grade S355J2, thickness acc. to PIANC2002 Coating acc. to ISO 12944C5M
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Release of production only after technical approval Quality control process and Third Party Verification Final documentation (manuals, mill certificates etc.) Supervision of Fender installation at site Availability of spare parts and local support
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
QUOTE A
NO YES (YES) NO NO NO (YES) NO
QUOTE B
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Summary
DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY
SUMMARY The increase in vessel sizes and new developments e.g. special coatings, leads to new requirements on Fender Solutions. Designs have to incorporate all conditions at site and available Norms. Vital data (e.g. velocity) and requirements (e.g. standoff) have to be collected and evaluated thoroughly. The demand for Customised Fender Solutions is increasing and challenges especially the final client when comparing fender designs.
CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS
Summary