1.5GHz Negative Impedance Converter Paper
1.5GHz Negative Impedance Converter Paper
1.5GHz Negative Impedance Converter Paper
Abstract
The need for small antenna with wide instantaneous bandwidth is vital in mobile Cognitive radio nodes / transceivers. The fundamental limit of small antennas is a problem which passive matching cannot solve. However, nonFoster matching provides a solution to this problem. In this paper, we show a negative impedance converter that provides a negative capacitor up to 1.5GHz. This is the highest frequency report to date. The negative capacitor can help increase the Q of antennas beyond what is achievable with passive matching.
NIC based matching networks include [2] which matched a six (6) inch antenna from 20MHz to 120MHz. Ref [4] matched a meta-material based antenna which provided a better than 10dB return loss between 450MHz and 500MHz with a top frequency of 500MHz. Other attempts either show either analytical or simulated results.
GBJT3 ID=GP2 CAP ID=C1 C=1 pF PORT P=1 Z=50 Ohm GBJT3 ID=GP1 PORT P=2 Z=50 Ohm
2 C C 2 1 1 B B E 3 E 3
Common ground-plane
Via
(a)
(b)
DC blocking Capacitor
Capacitor
Resistor
Transistor
Via hole
Transmission Line
(c)
(d)
Fig 2: The layout of the NIC (a) Linvills NIC schematic (b) Cross -sectional view (c) Top view and (d) Reverse view
.4 -0
-0 .6
-0.8
.0 -2
Fig 3:
-1.0
-4 .0 -5. 0
2 -0.
-10.0
-3 .0
The structure shown in Fig. 2 has been built and measured. The measured S11and S22 results are shown in Fig.3. Fig.3 also shows the NIC performance after the effects of the transmission line, stabilizing resistors and capacitors have been de-embedded from the measured result. The plots shown in Fig. 3 below, shows non-Foster performance after deembedding. It can be seen that the locus of S11 and S22 plots rotate anticlockwise with increase in frequency between 595MHz and 1.5GHz. De-embedding entails removing the effects of all the additional elements (resistor and capacitor) and the transmission lines between the measurement ports and points A and B (Fig. 2c). A plot of the resistance and reactance seen from points A and B is shown in fig. 4. The
10.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0 5.0
0.2
3 Measurement results
0. 4
measurement port and the NIC to further ensure stability by providing resistive damping. The NIC exists between points A and B (fig. 2c). Other components after these points are added to make the NIC measureable as a standalone structure. The performance of the NIC alone is found by de-embedding it from the measured S parameters of the structure.
reactance plot shows a negative slope which indicates the presence of a negative reactive element.
1.0
0.8
2. 0
0 3.
0 4.
5.0
10.0
50
Im(Z(1,1)) (L) De-embedded Measured NIC Im(Z(2,2)) (L) De-embedded Measured NIC
Re(Z(1,1)) (R) De-embedded Measured NIC Re(Z(2,2)) (R) De-embedded Measured NIC
60
40
-50
20
0 1400 1500
4 Conclusion
We have presented a double sided two-port NIC which shows a capability of non-Foster behaviour up to 1.5GHz, which is the highest reported. This NIC circuit can be used as a matching network or part of a broadband matching network for small antenna. There is a need for proper stability analyses as stability is a major challenge with negative elements and NICs.
References
[1] I. F. Akyildiz, et al., "A survey on spectrum management in cognitive radio networks," Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 46, pp. 4048, 2008. S. E. Sussman-Fort and R. M. Rudish, "Non-Foster Impedance Matching of Electrically-Small Antennas," Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 57, pp. 2230-2241, 2009. H. R. Myler, et al., "A concurrent processing approach for software defined radio baseband design," in Technical, Professional and Student Development Workshop, 2005 IEEE Region 5 and IEEE Denver Section, 2005, pp. 20-24. H. Mirzaei and G. V. Eleftheriades, "A wideband metamaterial-inspired compact antenna using embedded non-Foster matching," in Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), 2011 IEEE International Symposium on, 2011, pp. 1950-1953. J. G. Linvill, "Transistor Negative-Impedance Converters," Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 41, pp. 725-729, 1953.
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
Resistance (ohms)
Reactance (ohms)