Study of Reduction Behaviour of Iron Ore Lumps A: BINAYAK MOHAPATRA (10504004) DHARANIDHAR PATRA (10504021)
Study of Reduction Behaviour of Iron Ore Lumps A: BINAYAK MOHAPATRA (10504004) DHARANIDHAR PATRA (10504021)
Study of Reduction Behaviour of Iron Ore Lumps A: BINAYAK MOHAPATRA (10504004) DHARANIDHAR PATRA (10504021)
DEPARTMENT OF METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ROURKELA MAY 2009
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the thesis entitled, STUDY OF REDUCTION KINETICS OF HEMATITE IRON ORE BY COAL submitted by Mr. Dharanidhar Patra in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Bachelor inTechnology Degree in Metallurgical and Materials Engineering with specialization in Metallurgical and Materials Engineering at the National Institute of Technology, Rourkela (Deemed University) is an authentic work carried out by him under my supervision and guidance. To the best of my knowledge, the matter embodied in the thesis has not been submitted to any other University / Institute for the award of any Degree or Diploma.
Prof. M. Kumar Dept. of Metallurgical & Materials Engg. National Institute of technology Rourkela 769008
ABSTRACT
Studies on chemical and physical properties, and reduction behaviour (in coal) of hematite iron ores, procured from ten different mines of Orissa, were undertaken to provide information to the iron and steel industries (sponge iron plants in particular). Majority of the iron ores were found to have high iron and low alumina and silica contents. All these iron ores were free from the deleterious elements (S, P, As, Pb, alkalies, etc.). The results indicated lower values of shatter and abrasion indices, and higher values of tumbler index in all the iron ore lumps except Serazuddin (previous) and Khanda Bandha OMC Ltd.. For all the fired iron ore pellets, the degree of reduction in coal was more intense in the first 30 minutes after which it became small. Slow heating led to higher degree of reduction in fired pellets than rapid heating. All the iron ores exhibited more than 90% reduction in their fired pellets in 2 hrs. time interval at a temperature of 9000C. Iron ore lumps showed lower degree of reduction than the corresponding fired pellets.
CONTENTS
(i) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
(ii) PREFACE CHAPTER-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 Sponge iron production scenario in India 1.3 iron ore and coal reserves in India 1.4 DIFFERENT ROUTES OF SPONGE IRON PRODUCTION 1.5 SELECTION OF RAW MATERIALS FOR DRI PRODUCTION 1.6 MECHANISM OF DR PROCESS 1.7 LITERATURE REVIEW 1.8 Iron and steel production scenario in india 1.9 Aims and objectives CHAPTER-2 EXPERIMENTAL details 2.1 PROCEDURE FOR REDUCTION STUDIES Graphical analysis CHAPTER-3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION 20 i ii 1-2 2-3 3 -5 5-7 7-14 14-17 17 18 19
20-21 21-27 28 28
3.1Comparison of reduction characteristics of pellets (fired) and lumps 29 3.2 Effect of time on degree of reduction 3.3 Effect of heating mode on degree of reduction CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSION 30 29 29
REFFERENCES
In order to accept the potential of the fact, it is rather imperative to understand the basic mechanism involved in DR process using non coking coal as reductant. The reduction of iron ore by carbon is one of the most important reactions in iron making in blast furnace, rotary kiln and electric smelting furnace. Extensive studies has been carried out on the reduction behavior of iron ore mixed with carbon/char/graphite/coke etc , which reveals that the reduction reaction take place via gaseous intermediate like Carbon monoxide and Carbon dioxide. As such it is evident that, the actual direct reduction doesnt need any gaseous medium to be carried out. But of late it has been rather well accepted that, the reduction of Iron oxide by carbon in blast furnace and direct reduction process of sponge Iron production is mostly the result of indirect reduction. Currently a lot of emphasis is being given to direct reduction process because use of pre-reduced pellets or sponge iron as feed for blast furnace, induction furnaces and basic oxygen furnaces, despite some associated drawbacks, offers much scope for improving both productivity and economy in coke consumption.
1.2
Sponge
iron production
scenario in India
Installed capacity & production sponge iron in India up to 2009-10 : SIMA Projection (Million Tonnes)
1.4.1
Rotary Kiln Processes are very useful for Sponge Iron Production using non-coking coal as reductant. The Iron Ore in the form of lump or pellet is charged from one end with non-coking coal and heated from the other end, thus keeping counter current movement of raw materials and gases. The reduced ore comes out as product from opposite end .The Rotary movement of the Kiln requires good strength of raw
materials during reduction. Generation of fines from poor raw material promote ring formation leading to poor performance and decreased productivity.
1.4.3
In this process iron oxide fines, coal fines and binder are mxed together and palletized .The green pellets are placed on a rotating hearth. As the hearth rotates around the circular furnace, the pellets are heated to 1250 oC-1350oC and the iron
oxide is reduced to metallic iron. Reduction of iron oxide is accomplished by the carbon contained in the pellets. Residence time in hearth is around 15-25 mins. during which 90-95% of iron oxide is converted in to metallic iron. Burner fuel for RHF can be in the form of pulverized coal , natural gas, and coke oven gas , coal oil mixture. Volatiles and CO gas evolved from the pellets are combusted within the RHF thus providing a significant portion of total heat requirement.
The DRI produced from the RHF is fed to an electric melter called Electric Iron making Furnace ( EIF) to produced a high quality liquid iron known as FASTIRON.
1.5
SELECTION
OF
RAW
MATERIALS
FOR
DRI
PRODUCTION
The efficiency and cost effectiveness of DRI production are very sensitive to their raw material characteristics. In a coal based process , these are governed by nature of coal
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION :
a. Fe Content :
b . Gangue Content (SiO2+Al2O3): c. Sulpher, phosphorus and alkali content: d. Oxide of Calcium and magnesium (CaO & MgO )
REDUCIIBILTY:
The reducibility determines the ease with which oxygen can be removed from the iron oxide in the ore by reducing gases. This influences the productivity and quality of the product. The reducibility is inversely proportional to the time required reach some arbitrarily chosen degree of reduction. The standard norm is represented by , dR/dT = 0.5% per minute ,minimum, which can be verified experimentally. Reducibility of the iore depends on size, shape and distribution of the ore. Hematite ore is chosen for DRI production, because it has better reducibility than magnetite ore.
PHYSCAL CHARACTERSTCS :
a. Size :
Size of the ore is very important for DRI producton. The particle size, shape and its distribution affect the reducibility o f the ore. The rate of reduction of iron oxide increases with decrease of size of the iron ore. The size is determined by its reducibility . It has been observed that best results are obtained with size ranging from +6 to + 18 mm, wth particle diameter of 10.5 mm to 11.5 mm.
b. Strength :
The strength and resistance of the iron ore to degradation is represented by Tumbler Index, Abrasion Index, Shatter Index and Thermal Degradation Index.
1.5.2 COAL The properties to be considered for selection of coal for DRI production are as follows.
2.sulpher 3.Ash fusion temperature 4.Ash chemistry 5.Coal char reactivity 6.Coal char strength 7.Particle size 8.Caking Index 9.Bulk density
2. SULPHER CONTENT
Sulpher remains in the coal in two forms; Organic sulpher and Pyretic sulpher. The pyretic sulpher may be present as sulphde or sulphate .The amount of sulpher as sulphate is usually very law. However this should be checked or determined, because it lowers the ash fusion temperature .The pyretic sulpher is partially roasted in the pre heat zone and the organic sulpher is gradually .Sulpher balance shows that around 80-84% of sulpher leaves the kiln in the off gas and in the char, under Indian condition .
4. ASH CHEMISTRY
The coal ash chemistry is good tool to evaluate coal for DR process. The silica ratio of the ash should be high and preferably above 80% . It s found that , the ash fusion temperature has a linear relationship with the constituent of the ash. Silica Ratio= % SiO2/( %SiO2+%Fe2O3+%CaO=%MgO)
FeO+CaO+MgO+K2O+Na2O Alkali Ratio = (% Ash in coal) (K2O +Na2O) in ash 100 The alkali ratio of the coal should be less than 0.3. High alkali ratio, indicates low ash fusion temperature.
7. PARTICLE SIZE
The size of the coal should be such that it mixes well with charges as the charge move along the kiln. Size of the coal should not be very fine, otherwise it causes
carbon loss. The size of the coal should not be very large as it will float on the top of the charge bed. The lower size is determined from the fluidizing velocity of coal, the coal fines are not desirable . However a small amount may remain in the charge. The proportion of the -5 mm size in the coal feed should not exceed 5-10%. The coal from the discharge end is blown to meet the reduction reaction and heat requirement .The size of the particle depends on the throw required to reach a particular distance in the kiln . In general the blown coal size ranges between 3mm to 25 mm .
8. CAKING INDEX
High caking index coal causes agglomeration and reduces the char reactivity of the coal, it also causes accretion formation in the kiln and hinder operation of the kiln. Therefore caking index of the coal should be less than three , preferably less than on
9. BULK DENSITY
The bulk density of coal plays an important role in the productivity performance of the kiln. In general the coal with higher volatile matter have smaller bulk density, and occupy larger space in the kiln., there by reducing available kiln volume for production. Experience in DRI production indicates that the bulk density of the coal (sized) should be 800kg/m3 Some recommended physical and chemical properties of coal are given in the table.
Fe2O3 (Wustite)
Fe3O4
FeO
Fe (Hematite)
(Magnetite)
(Metallic iron)
The reaction which are involved in the reduction of iron ore is as follows,
The reduction of iron oxides initiated by solid carbon as per the above mention reaction, and the CO gas evolved again participate n the further reduction of iron oxides.
Fe2O3 + CO Fe3O4 + CO2 ; H4 = -12.85 Kcal --- (4) Fe3O4 + CO FeO + CO2 ; H5 = 8.76 Kcal. ----- (5) FeO + CO Fe + CO2 ; C + CO2 2CO ; H6 = -6.85 Kcal ----- (6) H7 = 41.22 K cal ---- (7)
The CO gas produced by, carbon gasification reaction, reduction of oxides by solid carbon , and by oxidation of carbon, reduces the iron oxides to their lower oxidation states, and the CO2 gas produced again react with solid carbon to form carbon monoxide gas and that carbon monoxide gas again participate in the reduction of iron oxides
The H2 gas reduces the iron oxide to their lower oxidation state and produce water vapour as per the reaction (8), (9), (10). The water vapour thus produced react with solid carbon to form H2 and CO gas as per reaction (11) and the H2 and CO gas again participate in the reduction of iron oxides.
The solid carbon present in the charge material is oxidized by the little air present in the kiln to produce carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide .The carbon monoxide formed, reduces the iron oxides, and the carbon dioxide react with solid carbon to form carbon monoxide through carbon gasification reaction.
stepwise throughout the lumps, where the the presence of magnetite, wustite and iron at the early stages was confirmed by metallographic observations. The used the following equations for data analysis. ln t Vs 1/T The value of activation energy obtained for zenith iron ore lumps varies from 79.81140.51KJ/mole.
Percentage
64.51% 92.25% 2.34% 1.55% 0.14% .03% 3.68
CHAPTER -2
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS 2.1 PROCEDURE FOR REDUCTION STUDIES
Zenith iron ore lumps and Lingaraj coal were taken. Crushing the iron ore lumps to 20-25mm in size. Crushing the coal to -6+16# size. Air drying of lumps followed by oven drying at 1100C to remove moisture. The lumps that were formed were taken inside a stain less steel container ( size: 77mm height 40 mm inside diameter ) with a mouth tightly closed by an air tight cover having an out let for exit gas. Then the lumps were surrounded by coal and then reduced. The position of the iron ore lumps in the packed bed of solid reductant was approximately at the center. This ensures complete surrounding of lumps by solid reductant. The reduction experiments were carried out by heating the samples in
of 850, 900, 950, 10000C at a rate of about 70C per minute and were soaked at these temperature for varying time periods in the range 15 - 120 minutes. During the reduction at a particular temperature each container was taken out at an interval of 15 minutes up to 30 minutes of residence , then at an interval of 30 minutes up to 120 minutes of residence in the furnace. Then the containers were cooled to the room temperature in air and the weight losses of the lumps were recorded.
The degrees of reduction of pellets were calculated by using the following formula.
Graphical Analysis
The graphical analysis was done by plotting a graph of degree of reduction VS time(in min) which shows degree of reduction increases with time with increase in temperature. Temperature Time (in min) 15 30 45 60 90 8500C 120 15 Degree of Reduction (%ge) 31.09 41.07 41.14 48.53 56.12 59.81 36.86 Degree of Swelling 0.50 1.36 3.49 5.02 5.20 8.89 2.04
30 45 60 9000C Temperature 90 120 Time (in min) 15 30 45 60 90 9500C 120 15 30 45 60 90 10000C 120
42.89 50.13 58.05 62.33 70.11 Degree of Reduction 37.73 55.72 64.46 70.05 72.28 75.86 56.13 64.25 70.69 76.59 82.26 88.13
4.46 10.63 15.23 18.11 20.03 Degree of Swelling 2.45 3.24 6.69 15.22 17.6 21.3 2.83 4.87 8.87 9.05 19.5 22.4
Temperature
8500C
7 21 76
9000C 20 40 60 80 9500C 20 40 60 80 3 8.8 22 79 1.10 2.17 3.09 4.37 5 14 35 1.87 2.64 3.56
1000 C
Slope
0.96 104 1.29104 1.69104
Activation Energy(kj/mole)
79.81 107.25 140.51
CHAPTER-3
RESULT AND DISCUSSION 3.1Comparison of reduction characteristics of pellets (fired) and lumps
In this study, reduction behaviours of dried hematite iron ore lumps (size: 15 mm approx.) have been compared with those of corresponding fired pellets reduced (in coal) under identical slow heating conditions (heating rate: 70C min-1, temperature: 900C, soak time: 1 hr.). Data for their degree of reduction values have been recorded and plotted as a function of their total iron contents. The results established lower degree of reduction in lumps than the corresponding fired pellets. the dried iron ore lumps have much lower porosity values than those of corresponding fired pellets. The appreciably lower porosity in iron ore lumps appears to be the most likely reason for their lower reducibility. As outlined in the literature ,hematite pellets tend to form disordered and hence more reactive/easily reducible wustite (FeO) . This may be the another reason for relatively higher reducibility of pellets, as observed in the present investigation. It was noted that Zenith, and lumps cracked into fine fragments during reduction at 900C, and hence their degree of reduction values could not be measured. The breakdown in these lumps may be attributed to the higher rate of Fe2O3 - Fe3O4 transformation and generation of higher therma1 strain. An increased degree of Fe2O3 - Fe3O4 transformation increases the volumetric strain (abnormal swelling) and thus the cracking tendency.
energy and kiln life. the excessively high degree of reduction in the first 30 minutes is mainly associated with the release of volatiles from coal, their reformation into H2 , CO, etc. and major participation of these reducing gases in the reduction of iron oxide (i.e. an appreciable presence of H2 and CO in the reduction chamber gives a boost in the reduction rate). The decrease in reduction rate with increasing time above 30 minutes is undoubtedly due to the combined effects of an increase in product metallic layer thickness and diminished evolution of volatile matter from coal. An increase in the thickness of product iron layer offers greater resistance in the diffusion of carbon and reducing gas to the surface of unreduced iron oxide.
CHAPTER 4
CONCLUSION
From the results of the present study, the following conclusions may be drawn. Reduction time and temperature had marked influence on the degree of reduction. The degree of reduction increased with increase in reduction temperature from 850-10000C. In studied time period of 15120 minutes the rate of reduction was higher up to 50-70% reduction and decreased in latter stages. There was no effect of type of coal on the degree of reduction of iron ore lumps. The reduction behavior of iron ore pellets was identical in all the studied coals. The kinetic data of non isothermal reduction (heating from room temperature to required reduction temperature and then soaking at that temperature for required period of time) of Zeineith iron ore lumps by the selected coals in the temperature range of 850-10000C were found to be fit well in the differential model, ln t Vs 1/T. The apparent activation energy values of the above mentioned iron ores were found to be in the range of 79.81-140.51KJ/mole. The overall rate thus appears to be controlled by C/CO2 reaction or carbon gasification reaction. The difference in the reduction behavior of iron ore lumps, in coal and, was apparent in initial stages of reduction at lower temperature. The result demonstrated that, iron ore lumps were less reducible than their corresponding iron ore pellets. The reduced iron ore pellets, in general, showed a decrease in their compressive strength with increase in degree of reduction up to 60 65%, followed by a slight decrease at about 85 90% reduction and then remained approximately constant.
The reduction behavior of iron ore lumps with lingaraj coal ( -6# +16 #) size.
REFERENCE
1. .Shrinivasan N.S ., Laheri A.K., Met.Trans. , 8B (1997)175. 2. Abraham M.C., Ghosh A., Iron Making and Steel Making, 6(1979)14. 3. Chakravarty S., Reddy G.V., Sharma T., Trans.IIM, 44(1991)1. 4. Roy A.K., Prasad K.K., Sen P.K., Trans.IIM, 44(1991)171. 5. St.John D.H., Methew S.P., Hayes P.C., Met.Trans. , 15B (1984)701. 6. Jena S., M.Tech Thesis, Study of reduction behavior of Iron Ores by Non coking Coal for application in Sponge Iron Palnts. 7. Chaterjee Amit, Production of Sponge Iron with particular reference to India, Iron and Steel Review, (2002)36. 8. Jindal N., DRI Industry Widening Horizons, Iron and Steel Review, March (2002)32. 9. Nakra N., IIM Metal News, 18(1996) 12-18. 10. Das M.C., Sponge Iron Industry in India, Iron and steel Review, December, Annual (2001)49. 11. Pattnaik N.K. , Orissa Sponge Iron Ltd., Lecture Note at N.I.T., Rourkela (2003). 12. Fillipov S., The Theory of Metallurgical Process, Mir Publisher, MOSCOW, (1975)153- 163. 13. Seaston C.E., Foster J.S., Velasco J., Trans.ISI Japan, 23(199)490. 14. Rao Y.K., Met.Trans.,2(1971)1439. 15. Fruhen R.J., Met.Trans. 8B (1977)270. 16. Walker P.L., Shelef M., Anderson R.A., Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Marcel Dekker, New York (1968)287-383. 17. M.I.E.T. Guindy , Devnporty W.G., Met.Trans. 1(1970)1729. 18. Mukherjee S., Roy H.S., Mukhuerjee A., Iron Making and Steel Making, 13(1986)163. 19. Majumdar A.K., Sharma T., Reddy G.V., Trans. IIM, 42(1989)299. 20. Sharma T., Trans.II M, 43(1990)380.