A Study Guide For Communist Revolutionaries

Contents
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point, however,
is to change it." - Karl Marx
2.Contents
Contradiction and Antagonism
Dedication and Acknowledgments
Introduction
1. Dialectical and Historical Materialism and the importance of

causality
2. Contradiction and Antagonism: the basis for two kinds of change
3. Quantity and Quality: the birth of the new and the destruction of the
old
4. The Leap: the motion of qualtitative change, the key to understanding

social revolution
5. Polarization: the destruction of the old connections and the possibility

for the new quality
6. Base and Superstructure: Society - how and why transformation is

possible
7. The Making of History and the role of the individual
8. New Epoch Calls for New Doctrine
Next: Acknowledgments
Home | Schools | Study Groups | Under Discussion | Forums | About ISSS
Institute for the Study of the Science of Society

E-mail [email protected]
Dedication and
Acknowledgments
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point, however, is to
change it." - Karl Marx
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
Introduction
In memory of Sue Ying,

who instructed us in the study of Marxism,
inspired us with her relentless pursuit of knowledge,
encouraged us to grow,
and challenged us to forever challenge ourselves.
Marxist Philosophy: A Study Guide for Revolutionaries in the Age of

Electronics is both a continuation and an extension of Marxist philosophy. It
rests on study and discussion of both the scientific writings of Marx and
Engels and the organizational and theoretical continuity of the communist
movement since their time. However, today’s scientific and technological
changes, as well as the economic and social changes they bring about, also
make possible an extension of our understanding of the process of change
and the challenges revolutionaries face today.
Much of the study in philosophy summed up here pre-dates the formation of

the Institute for the Science of Society. That study was an essential reference
point for thousands of revolutionaries in various political organizations over
several decades. Many of those discussions began in the 1970s and 1980s
under the auspices of the Communist League and the Communist Labor
Party and then continued in other forms after the CLP was disbanded in
1993. So the "we" referred to in the Introduction is a much broader group of
revolutionaries than the Institute staff itself.
Although the objective economic processes referred to in some of the classes

are having an impact on society and politics around the globe, the Study
Guide explores the implications for revolutionaries in this country.
The staff of the Institute for the Study of the Science of Society is grateful to
have been a part of these discussions over the years. The editors had the
privilege of summing up and extending those discussions. To do so, we relied
on the collective discussions of the full Staff of the Institute. Special thanks go
to Shivaani Selvaraj and Alix Mariko Webb, who helped to edit the editors,
and to Nicholas Kim McQuerrey for the creativity and thoughtfulness he
applied to the design of the Study Guide.
Many of the readings in the Study Guide are accessible thanks to two
websites – www.marxists.org and www.marx2mao.org. We want not only to
express our gratitude for the permission to use material from those websites
in the creation of the Study Guide, but also to encourage all students of
Marxism to make use of those websites as valuable resources.
We learned a lot working on this Study Guide, and we hope it will provide a
way for revolutionaries to apply the intellectual energy necessary to meet the
actual challenges posed by the revolutionary process in this country in this
epoch.
The Editors
Beth Gonzalez
Brooke Heagerty
Sandra Reid
Top of page
Previous: Contents Next: Introduction


Introduction
Introduction
Introduction
1. Dialectical and Historical Materialism
Helpful terms and concepts
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point,
however, is to change it." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach)
Society today is in turmoil and transition. More is at stake than ever before —
not only in whose interests society will be reorganized, but also how and
when humanity will be able to take the next step toward realizing its full
potential. We are in an epoch of human history made possible by an
explosion of science and knowledge and defined by the beginning of
production without labor. As society today enters this qualitatively new epoch,
revolutionaries face new challenges. The mastery of the scientific method
associated with Marxism is urgent. Using that Marxism, revolutionaries must
focus intellectual attention on developing the guidelines for revolutionary
practice in this epoch.
Marx and Engels couldn't describe the changes going on before our eyes
today, but their understanding of the laws of motion and change allowed
them to anticipate a leap to a new quality of social and human development.
The science of society they developed equips us to participate productively in
the profound changes swirling around us.
The following excerpt from Anti-Duhring, by Frederick Engels, shows Engels’

dialectical conception of development and suggests the potential offered by
this epoch.
"The first men who separated themselves from the animal kingdom were in all
essentials as unfree as the animals themselves, but each step forward in
civilization was a step towards freedom.... For the generation of fire by friction
for the first time gave man command over one of the forces of nature, and
thus separated him forever from the animal kingdom. The steam-engine will
never bring about such a mighty leap forward in human development,
however important it may seem in our eyes as representing all those
immense productive forces dependent on it, forces which alone make
possible a state of society in which there are no longer class distinctions or
anxiety over the means of subsistence for the individual, and in which for the
first time there can be talk of real human freedom, of an existence in harmony
with the known laws of nature. But the simple fact that all past history can be
characterized as the history of the epoch from the practical discovery of the
transformation of mechanical motion into heat up to that of the transformation
of heat into mechanical motion shows how young the whole of human history
still is, and how ridiculous it would be to attempt to ascribe any absolute
validity to our present views."
In this sense, Engels suggests leaps in science and technology far greater
than those of his day, and he anticipates the scientific and material possibility
for human beings to escape the dog-eat-dog, survival-of-the-fittest laws that
govern the rest of the animal kingdom and to embrace and realize the full
potential of their humanity.
This "Introduction" presents the contents of this Study Guide, discusses the
importance of both philosophy and ideology to revolutionaries, offers some
thoughts on the importance of Marxists developing doctrine for our time, and
shares with you how this
Study Guide came to be. Some of the terms in this introduction will be more
fully explored in the classes that follow.
Marxist philosophy and revolutionaries
Marxist philosophy helps us set up and solve real questions. It explains the
material nature of the world and the dialectical nature of its motion and
change. Historical materialism is the extension of that methodology to the
study of society and how it develops and changes. When revolutionaries
extend the science of change to the study of society, we can understand how
society evolves and leaps ahead, which aspects of social change are
automatic and beyond our will and which aspects require conscious and
planned action by people.
The complexities of history point to the importance of Marxist philosophy for

revolutionaries. History is the multi-layered story of the relation between what
objective conditions make possible and what conscious people make happen.
It's the story of intrigue and deception for selfish gain, of personal sacrifice for
high ideals, of wars for liberation of oppressed peoples, of revolutions to
overthrow one class and secure political power for another. In a broader
sense, it is the story of people fighting for their moral values and historically
evolved aspirations in the context of economic and other material changes. It
is the story of the relation between the practical (activity, organization, social
struggle) and the conscious (philosophy, theory, politics, ideology). It is the
story of political revolution within social revolution. Within history,
revolutionaries take up the challenge to develop the subjective or conscious
understanding that equips people to fight for and determine the results of the
objective changes.
The more revolutionaries know about how the world works and how history
unfolds, the better we are able to play our particular role.
So why this particular Study Guide?
We want to make every possible contribution to the continuity of the study of

Marx and Engels on philosophy. Philosophy isn't the property of the elite few;
it belongs to every revolutionary. This Study Guide, for example, is the
product of the summation of decades of collective experience and study by
active revolutionaries. The search for the correct approach to advancing the
revolutionary process in the US propelled the study and discussion of
philosophy. The deeper understanding of philosophy generated the
framework for developing doctrine for the questions of revolution posed by
this epoch. By employing dialectical materialism to study the qualitative
changes in how things are produced today, we were able to further our
understanding of the process of change and to draw conclusions about what
this means for society. We could then clearly see that to ensure the continuity
of Marxism today, Marxists have to use the science to further develop the
conclusions of how society is changing and why. Marxists must use those
conclusions to more sharply focus their activity as revolutionaries.
Therefore, this Study Guide is aimed at the study of philosophy as the

science of change. In assembling and distributing it, we hope to contribute a
mechanism both for continuing to study the philosophy developed by Marx
and Engels and for further exploring that philosophy in the context of a new
epoch in social development. We hope that active revolutionaries will find this
Study Guide useful and that it will provide
a framework for the continuing development of the science, doctrine and

practice of revolutionaries.
This Study Guide is a tool for active revolutionaries who strive to master the
science of revolution. It provides a framework for discussion among those
who are willing to study, think, and collectively develop the principles that will
effectively guide the work of revolutionaries.
We revolutionaries today have new territory to chart, new challenges to figure

out, new opportunities for actually achieving the kind of society that previous
generations could only dream of. We hope the use of this Study Guide will, on
the one hand, stimulate discussions that cultivate a scientific framework for
revolutionary passion and, on the other hand, help aim the study of Marxism
toward revolutionary practice.
Ideology
In this spirit, something must be said about ideology and its role in ensuring
that the study of philosophy truly becomes a tool for change.
Consciousness compels, motivates and directs action; action completes or

consummates consciousness. What you do is an expression of what you think
or believe on one level or another. Ideology is the intangible glue between
what you think and what you do.
What do we mean by "ideology"? There are many different definitions and

uses of the word. Many people refer to ideology in the sense of the
contending sets of abstract ideas that separate one group of people from
another. But here we are using the term "ideology" in the sense of a system
of ideas that expresses and defines relationships among people and between
individuals and society. For the revolutionary, ideology expresses an
understanding of his or her relation to the rest of the world and a sense of
responsibility to society. Ideology is not just a question of what you think, but
rather how you approach what you think: what you do and how you see your
place in the world and your role in changing it.
So what does ideology have to do with studying philosophy and the science
of society? Science is not the same as ideology, but it is one of the fibers that
strengthen ideology. Sterile study of philosophy or Marxism in general does
not make one a revolutionary; nor does outrage at injustice equip the
revolutionaries to accomplish their tasks. Ideology grows out of the
interrelation between the passionate struggle for a better world and a
scientific approach to accomplishing that change. For Marxists, the purpose
and value of philosophy is not simply to interpret the world, but to change it.
Marxist philosophy provides the scientific approach that reinforces our
conviction that what we are fighting for is possible. It identifies the role of
revolutionaries in the revolutionary process, provides the tools we need to
figure out how to carry out our commitment to humanity, and gives us
confidence that our energies are going to make a difference.
Scope of this Study Guide -- themes in philosophy
The classes and readings in this Study Guide explore two main themes in the
study of change. Both themes point to the responsibility of revolutionaries to
develop the conscious side of the revolutionary process.
The first theme addresses the relationship of the objective and subjective
aspects of the process of change. The central organizing concept is that
changes in the productive forces are the basis for the revolutionary
reorganization of society. These objective changes, however, don't
automatically determine how society is organized. People fight out and decide
the outcome of epoch-defining material changes in society, and they can only
do so under definite material conditions.
For example, the Industrial Revolution ushered in a whole new stage of

development of society. However, it was the class struggle and the different
outcomes of the various political revolutions of that era that determined
whether society would industrialize in the interests of the masses of people or
in the interests of the capitalists.
Some distorted Marx's and Engels' thesis about how society changes,
implying that Marx and Engels underestimated the role of the subjective. On
the contrary, Marx and Engels relied on history and philosophy to show how
people fight out and determine the changes made possible by objective
changes. Once again, Marxists have to assess the objective, economic
changes and rally to the responsibility of revolutionaries to develop the
subjective side of the revolutionary process, to ensure the intellectual
development of the combatants.
The second theme explores the nature of motion and change. Change is not
just a shift in the balance of forces, and it doesn't come about simply through
the same old thing getting bigger or more intense. What then accounts for
change? Qualitative change can only begin when something new enters into
an ongoing process from outside of that process or when something is
extracted from the process.
As we grappled with the nature of the profound changes in the world today,
we found that the current new objective conditions allowed us to understand
the dialectics of change further than had been possible in previous times. The
technology associated with electronics represents the beginning of production
without labor — an antagonism to capitalism’s essential relation of buying and
selling labor power. By looking at the changes going on around us, we were
able to grasp more deeply the importance of certain principles of Marxist
philosophy, such as, the difference between contradiction and antagonism,
how the introduction of something qualitatively new into a process begins the
quantitative stages of the leap. Our understanding of philosophy then helped
us grasp the importance of the materials changes going on throughout the
world today.
An understanding of the motion of change also sharpened our grasp of the

role of revolutionaries. Although capitalism could grow alongside of other
forms of private property, communism won't automatically grow out of the
destruction of capitalism. Communism is "a system or theory of the ownership
of all means of production (and distribution) by the community or society…as
a whole." Because communism means the abolition of private property, it
cannot coexist with or spontaneously grow out of capitalism. Achieving it will
depend on the consciousness and conscious activity of millions of people.
There exist certain values (such as the moral conviction that no one should
be hungry in a world of plenty) and practices (such as the development and
sharing of information and information products on the Internet) which are
consistent with communism. Although these values and practices are
consistent with communism, they can coexist with capitalism. Material
conditions are setting the objective basis for people to fight for communism.
What's missing is their consciousness to do so.
The challenge of developing doctrine
The interweaving of these two themes in philosophy, along with our collective
efforts to be effective revolutionaries, kept challenging us and pushing us
forward. We found that we had to make a distinction between the science of
society, referred to as Marxism, and doctrine, which is often also referred to
as Marxism. Simply put, science helps us understand the world; doctrine is a
guide to changing it. Once we understood that distinction, we saw the
importance of developing doctrine. So the classes in this Study Guide lead to
and culminate in a discussion of doctrine for this epoch. Here we will look
briefly at several related questions that are more fully explored in the various
classes, and developed in the class on doctrine.
What is doctrine and why is it so important to revolutionaries? Doctrine is a

general policy or set of principles that guides political activity toward a definite
political goal. These guidelines aim the political activity and collective efforts
of revolutionaries toward pushing the process ahead through its various
stages and toward its resolution.
As revolutionaries, we don't have the luxury of simply declaring what we're for
and what we're against. Serious revolutionaries proceed from the standpoint
of the line of march of the revolution – the stages it has to go through to
consciously and politically resolve the questions society is objectively fighting
out. Accomplishing each stage doesn’t happen automatically; nor is it a
smooth and even process. It depends on the consciousness of great numbers
of people. Doctrine guides revolutionaries to identify the opportunities
presented by the objective developments. It guides us as we set out to
develop the thinking of the people and prepare for future stages of the
revolutionary process as it matures.
Why is it so important to develop doctrine for our time? A new epoch means
revolutionaries operate under different conditions and therefore need the
guidance of new doctrine.
Marx and Engels made their intellectual and practical contribution in the
context of the social revolution brought on by the shift from an agrarian-based
to an industrial-based society. Likewise, we are also in an epoch of transition
from one material basis of society to another, that is, an epoch of social
revolution. And today, as in Marx's time, new tools are beginning to disrupt
and destroy the society built on the old basis. Such moments of transition and
instability in society are precisely when the work of revolutionaries is most
decisive in determining how society reorganizes around those new tools.
But there is a crucial difference between the transition that society was going
through in Marx's and Engels' time and that which our society is going
through today. Marx and Engels described how the beginning of industrial
production began to disrupt a society built around manual labor and how it
destabilized those who held political power.
Today, the beginning of the application of electronics to production is

disrupting a society based on electro-mechanical production and organized
around large-scale industry. On the one hand, capitalism depends on, and is
defined by, wage labor; on the other hand, new methods of production are
beginning to eliminate labor. This particular clash of law systems shapes the
social revolution of our epoch.
This makes all the difference in the world and calls for the development of
doctrine to guide the work of revolutionaries today. Marx and Engels faced a
situation in which
the interests of the working class were opposed to those of the capitalist
class, but the working class was locked into the system defined by the
interdependence of the two hostile classes. The objective connections
between those classes were growing and strengthening. By contrast, today
new methods of production are undermining and destroying those
connections. Today we face the social consequences of the capitalist system
in the process of its destruction, not the growing pains and expansion of
capitalism.
As a set of principles that guide revolutionaries’ work, doctrine has to align to

this qualitatively new situation. Its role is to guide revolutionaries' work within
this particular leap in society in order to advance the reconstruction of society
in the interests of all of humanity.
Besides aligning to the particular quality of the social revolution we are

dealing with, doctrine also has to speak specifically to the current stage of the
revolutionary process. Today doctrine has to guide us through the relatively
early stages of the revolutionary process, when society and the thinking of
the people are being disrupted. It should guide us as we focus our energies
to develop the conscious understanding of the millions of people whose lives
have been disrupted by underlying material changes and to cultivate their
ability to fight in their interests and the interests of all humanity. Future stages
of the revolutionary process will bring new challenges and will call for the
further development of doctrine.
What does this have to do with philosophy, and what difference does all this
make to the practical work or revolutionaries? Philosophy is about change —
what causes it and the nature of its motion. Revolutionaries are most effective
when they proceed from an understanding of the nature of change and aim
their work accordingly. Qualitative change doesn't come about through a
mechanical increase or decrease of the amount or intensity of the old; it
depends on the introduction of something new into an ongoing process.
Objective conditions set the basis for social change; people determine the
direction and outcome of that change. Doctrine proceeds from a scientific
description of the objective conditions and the laws of how change takes
place in order to determine general guidelines for the work of revolutionaries.
Many principles commonly accepted and followed by revolutionaries don't

proceed either from an understanding of how change actually takes place or
from an understanding of the specifics of this epoch. These principles are not
always explicitly stated. However, as the by-products of imposing doctrine for
one situation onto another, they are persistent. Certainly conceptions like
"build an anti-monopoly coalition," "unite to fight the right," or "fight back" as
routes to the transformation of society (or even to advancing the interests of
the exploited and oppressed) reflect an incorrect application of doctrine that
was appropriate elsewhere a century and a half ago.
Developing doctrine for this epoch and bringing it into play poses many more
questions than we can cover in this Introduction. As you go through the
classes in this Study Guide, you will explore the complexities of these and
other questions.
How to use the Study Guide
This guide offers a mechanism for the continued study and discussions that
equip revolutionaries to critically analyze events as they unfold. We tried to
aim the classes not so much at getting across a set of ideas as at providing a
process through which the
methodology of Marxism becomes an integral part of the participants’
intellectual and political lives. The value of this methodology is as a way of
understanding the world and how it works, approaching questions
revolutionaries have to figure out, and identifying the role of each individual in
revolutionary social change. Therefore, we share this Study Guide not so
much for one set of people to teach ideas or propagate beliefs to another set
of people, but to nurture and enhance the ability of all of us to think and
master the methodology for solving the problems posed by the class struggle
of this epoch.
Naturally, there is a relation between how we think and what we think. So,
some of the classes do point to some conclusions. But it is essential that we
don’t allow those conclusions (and tentative conclusions) to limit or define our
study and development of the science. The tragic history of confusing science
and doctrine has seen lives lost and revolutions betrayed. At times, this sort of
confusion has also constrained science and reduced it to the justification for a
doctrine or politically necessary policy at a given time and place.
Revolutionaries need to continue to develop scientifically and to learn to
employ the methodology that flows from Marxist philosophy so as to
continually develop doctrine as times change.
We hope you will use the methodology explored in the Study Guide to tackle
the actual questions revolutionaries face today. Go beyond imposing doctrine
of past moments onto today's reality. Develop and share your classes,
studies and conclusions. Above all, make this study and discussion a
continual and integral part of your life as a revolutionary. The study of
Marxism is not a one-time event. We learned a lot working on this Study
Guide. We hope others will learn a lot using it and will contribute to the
intellectual treasury of the revolutionary movement.
Top of page
Next: Dialectical and Historical

Previous: Acknowledgments
Materialism

Dialectical and
Historical
Materialism
and the Importance of
Causality
1.
1.Dialectical
Dialecticaland
andHistorical
HistoricalMaterialism
Materialism
2. Contradiction and Antagonism
This class will provide a basic overview of the principles of dialectical

materialism. It is designed to provide a foundation for delving into and
contributing to the philosophical concepts outlined in all of the Study Guide
classes that follow.
Dialectical and historical materialism is the philosophical approach of

revolutionaries to the study of the real world in constant change. Dialectical
materialism is Marxist philosophy.
Dialectics is the study of how things develop and change. The principles of
dialectics are:
Nature is an integrated and connected whole. Phenomena are

connected through causality.
Nature is in a state of constant change: development, disintegration,

dying away and arising.
Internal contradiction, the basis of quantitative development, is inherent

in all things.
Changes are from lower to higher order and occur as negations.
Qualitative changes occur by a quantitative extraction from the quality or

by quantitative introduction of an antagonistic new quality. Qualitative
changes occur as leaps.
Quantitative developments are definite and indispensable.
Materialism is the philosophical principle that the world is real and knowable
and that ideas come from interacting with the world (as opposed to
philosophical "idealism," which says that the world is a product of some idea
or ideal).
Historical materialism is the extension of the principles of dialectical

materialism to the study of social life, the study of society and history. It
shows that the method of securing the means of subsistence sets the
foundation for the character of a social system.
The practical significance of the principles of dialectical and historical

materialism is expressed in the law of causality. Behind the diversity of
phenomena, there are definite and more or less stable connections, which are
independent of human consciousness. The most fundamental and universal
connection, observed everywhere and always, in all phenomena, is that every
event has a cause, and every effect acts as a cause in some other
connection, giving rise to new effects. The alternative to this view is that the
world is a jumble of eclectic, disconnected and unscientific circumstances.
An understanding of causality allows revolutionaries to draw political

conclusions about the true, deep-lying causes of phenomena and the effects
that may occur. Causality means that the world is going somewhere. We only
have to find out what is causing its motion. Then we can utilize that process to
introduce the new ideas that can move the world forward. Ignorance of
causality gives rise to unscientific explanations, making it impossible for
revolutionaries to produce the effects they require.
Readings
The readings below may raise questions that go beyond the introductory
scope of this class. If so, we ask that you try to focus your discussion of
dialectical and historical materialism and the importance of causality on the
questions below. Future classes will further the discussion and probing of the
fundamental concepts of Marxist philosophy.
Joseph Stalin, "Dialectical and Historical Materialism," Problems of

Leninism.
http://www.marx.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm
The Institute for the Study of the Science of Society, "How and Why
Things Change," Institute Resource Paper #3.
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/inbox/res3.html
O. Kuusinen, ed., Excerpt from Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism, pp.

71-75; 77-80. http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/kuusinen2.pdf
Discussion Questions
1. What are the key principles that describe dialectical development? Why
does the dialectical method focus on that which is arising as opposed to that
which seems durable and permanent? Why are new social forces invincible?
2. What is the basic principle of materialism? of historical materialism?

Describe the terms: instruments of production, productive forces, relations of
production, and mode of production. Describe the dialectical development of
the struggle between the constantly developing productive forces and the
static productive relations.
3. How does dialectical materialism differ from idealism? What is the source
of social ideas? Why is dialectical materialism as a philosophical approach
fundamental to social revolution?
4. Discuss the law of cause and effect. Trace the basic law of capitalism as
the drive for maximum profits through the events leading up to the overthrow
of the system as an example of cause and effect. Why is it important to
understand the difference between the cause, conditions and occasion of a
political event? Discuss the practical significance of causality for revolution.
Top of page
Previous: Introduction Next: Contradiction and Antagonism


Contradiction
and Antagonism
The Basis for Two Kinds
of Change
2.Contradiction
2. Contradictionand
andAntagonism
Antagonism
3. Quantity and Quality
The question of change is fundamental to all philosophy. All life is motion and
all motion is a series of changes. When we consider things in their motion,
change and interconnection, we are at once confronted with contradiction.
Every phenomenon in nature is a contradiction, a unity of opposites.
Contradiction is an internal process and the basis of all quantitative
development. Development or motion comes about through the struggle and
unity of opposites.
For example, cause and effect make up a unity of opposites. Or, bourgeoisie
and proletariat, together, make up bourgeois society. The two antithetical
elements of a contradiction are both mutually exclusive and mutually
dependent. Together they make a quality. Further, both sides of the
contradiction come into being at the same time, in struggle. Their unity and
struggle is absolute, quantitative and ongoing.
What, then, accounts for fundamental, or qualitative, change?
All processes develop in stages. The relationship between the two sides of a
contradiction becomes more contradictory within each stage, forcing the
emergence of a new quantitative stage. Quantitative change creates the
conditions for qualitative changes to occur.
Qualitative changes, however, occur only by quantitative extraction from the

quality or by quantitative introduction of an antagonistic new quality into the
process. Antagonism replaces and destroys contradiction. Antagonism is the
mode of destruction and transformation to a new quality. Out of this process,
a synthesis, a new quality, a new unity of opposites, is born. All qualitative
changes occurs as leaps.
In contrast to dialectics, the metaphysical conception sees nature as an

arbitrary collection of objects and events, independent of and isolated from
one another, without universal, dialectical relationships. Metaphysics fails to
grasp an essential dialectical principle: Internal contradiction is the basis of
quantitative development and is in all things; but antagonism is the basis of
destruction and transformation to a new quality.
Implications for Today
These concepts are fundamental for revolutionaries. For example, without

grasping the difference between contradiction and antagonism,
revolutionaries will not understand the significance of today's qualitatively
new method of production for social revolution and the paramount importance
of injecting qualitatively new ideas into the revolutionary process. Without
new ideas, social transformation to a qualitatively new (communist) society
cannot occur.
Discussion questions and readings
1. Describe contradiction, the unity and struggle of opposites. Choose an

example to show how this works in nature and also in society.
Readings
J.V. Stalin, Dialectical and Historical Materialism. ("Dialectics comes

from" to "which they are connected.")
http://www.marx2mao.org/Stalin/DHM38.html
O. Kuusinen, ed., "Division into Opposites is the Chief Source of

Development," Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism.
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/kuusinen1.html
Chart on the Law of the Unity and Struggle of Opposites.

http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/universality.html
2. What is antagonism? To answer, examine the Freedom Movement that

began in the 1950s. Discuss why that social movement did not become
antagonistic to capitalism. Also, trace the development of industry and show
how the microchip created an antagonism to industrial production. Discuss
what this antagonism means for the contradiction between the bourgeoisie
and the proletariat. Why is understanding the difference between
contradiction and antagonism fundamental to our understanding of how
things change?
Readings
Nelson Peery, "The Process of Development" and "Dialectics: Quantity,

Quality, the Antagonistic Element," Entering an Epoch of Social
Revolution.
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/texts/epoch/epoch.complete.html [Note
from the Editors: There is an error on page 13. The last sentence in the
4th paragraph should read "Antagonism replaced contradiction and the
social revolution was under way."]
Brooke Heagerty and Nelson Peery, "The World Keeps Changing:

Conditions and Results of the Civil Rights Movement," Moving Onward:
From Racial Division to Class Unity. (pp. 32-40 in printed version)
http://www.lrna.org/texts/movingon/movingon.6.html
Brooke Heagerty and Nelson Peery, "The World Begins to Change:
World War II and After," Moving Onward: From Racial Division to Class
Unity. (pp. 29-31 in printed version)
http://www.lrna.org/texts/movingon/movingon.5.html
Institute for the Study of the Science of Society, "How and Why Things
Change," Institute Resource Paper #3. See section "How New Classes
Arise on the Basis of New Productive Forces."
Chart on Law of the Unity and Struggle of Opposites.

http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/universality.html
3. How is dialectics different from metaphysics? Discuss and contrast the

Hegelian and Marxist concept of thesis and antithesis in the formation of a
contradiction. What are the political ramifications for revolutionaries if change
is approached mechanically?
Readings
J.V. Stalin, Dialectical and Historical Materialism. ("Dialectics comes

from" to "which they are connected.")
http://www.marx.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm
Change," Institute Resource Paper #3. (See quote beginning, "What is
the dialectical process?")
Frederick Engels, "Introduction (General)," Anti Duhring.

http://www.marx2mao.org/M&E/AD78i.html#p1s14 (pp. 26-29)
Frederick Engels, "Dialectics of Nature - Notes," Dialectics of Nature.

("The law of identity" to "the inclusion of difference within identity.")
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1883/don/ch07.htm
Top of page
Previous: Dialectical and Historical

Next: Quantity and Quality
Materialism

Quantity and
Quality
The Birth of the New and
the Destruction of the
Old
3.Quantity
3. Quantityand
andQuality
Quality
4. The Leap
The relation between quantity and quality addresses the dialectical nature of
motion, the process of the destruction of the old and development of the new,
and how change comes about.
We speak of quality in the sense of a process and quantity in the sense of the
stages of development of the process. It is important to make the distinction
between quantity in this sense and quantity in the sense of numbers or
amount. Change is not a simple shift in the balance of forces or the simple
increase or decrease of the old. While contradiction is the basis for growth
and development, antagonism is the basis for destruction and the rise of
something new. The quantitative introduction of a new quality (a quality
antagonistic to the process) begins the leap. The new quality develops
quantitatively and, through a step-by-step process, disrupts and destroys
whatever previously held the process together.
Understanding the relation of quantity and quality allows revolutionaries to

understand the line of march of the revolution. This is the interrelation
between the objective and the subjective aspects of the revolutionary process
through the stages of its maturing — from the initial economic disruption of
society, through the stages of the destruction of what held society together, to
the point of such general instability that political revolution is possible. The
outcome of revolution depends, above all, on the consciousness of the
combatants. Understanding the quantitative stages of the objective aspects
of the revolutionary process allows revolutionaries to aim and focus their
efforts to develop the subjective aspects of the process.
The current epoch provides a rich context in which to see how this works.
Today, labor-replacing technology is being applied to production within an
economic system that is premised on the buying and selling of labor power.
The introduction of this qualitatively new technology initiates the step-by-step
destruction of the connection between the working class and the capitalist
class and everything that stands on the capitalist system of exploitation. But
the consciousness required to build a new society will not grow automatically
from that social destruction and social struggle. To ensure the outcome of the
social revolution already underway, we need to introduce the qualitatively new
ideas of revolution and the reconstruction of society.
Like other concepts in philosophy, the question of quantity and quality helps
us navigate our way through various problems that have historically
confronted revolutionaries. For example, an understanding of quantity and
quality helps explain why the simple intensification of the social struggle
doesn't lead to political revolution. The relation of quantity and quality is
indispensable to helping revolutionaries identify the actual stages and steps
in the line of march of the revolution of our time and the tasks of
revolutionaries at each of those stages.
Discussion Questions and Readings
1. Define quality. Define quantity. Is "quantity" simply "amount"? What do we

mean by the quantitative stages of development of the process?
Readings
Frederick Engels, "II. Dialectics," Dialectics of Nature. (From "It is

therefore, from the history" to "all his life without the slightest inkling of
it.") http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1883/don/ch02.htm
J.V. Stalin, " Anarchism or Socialism?," Collected Works, Vol. 1. (See

"The Dialectical Method.") http://www.marx2mao.org/Stalin/AS07.html
(pp. 300-304, especially 303-304)
Nelson Peery, "Dialectics: Quantity, Quality and the Antagonistic

Element," Entering an Epoch of Social Revolution. (pp. 12-13 in printed
text
Things Change," Institute Resource Paper, #3. (From "Early on" to
"wherein one quality is transformed into another.")
Miller, Steven. "Water, Ice and Steam – How Changes in Quantity Lead
to Changes in Quality." (Section "Hydrogen Bonds"; Section
"Development" from "The laws of dialectics" to "cause the leap to take
place.") http://www.scienceofsociety.org/discuss/dialectics/miller2.html
2. What is the relation between quantity and quality? How is that relation
reciprocal? Discuss the distinction and relation between quantitative
development based on contradiction and the quantitative stages of the leap
based on the introduction of a new quality into the old process?
Readings
Frederich Engels, "XII. Dialectics. Quantity and Quality," Anti-Duhring.
http://www.marx2mao.org/M&E/AD78i.html (pp. 160-163)
Frederick Engels, "Causality" and "Reciprocal Action," Dialectics of

Nature, pp. 144-146.
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/engels1.pdf
Frederick Engels, "On the Mechanical Conception of Nature," Dialectics

of Nature, pp. 147-150.
Beth Gonzalez, "Our Philosophical Outlook and the Line of March" (See
section on quantity and quality.)
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/discuss/philoline.html
Nelson Peery, "Dialectics: Quantity, Quality and the Antagonistic

Element." Entering an Epoch of Social Revolution (pp. 12-13 in printed
text)
Things Change," Institute Resource Paper, #3. (From "Early on" to
"wherein one quality is transformed into another.")
Miller, Steven. "Water, Ice and Steam – How Changes in Quantity Lead
to Changes in Quality," 2002 (Section "Hydrogen Bonds"; Section
"Development" from "The laws of dialectics" to "cause the leap to take
place.") http://www.scienceofsociety.org/discuss/dialectics/miller2.html
3. Describe the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the growth of the

productive forces that finally led to the "bursting asunder" of the feudal
relations of production.
Readings
Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, "Bourgeois and Proletarians," The

Communist Manifesto. (Esp., "The history of all" to "and of exchange.";
"The bourgeoisie" to "and its rule.")
http://www.marx.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-
manifesto/ch01.htm
Karl Marx, "Preface" to A Contribution to the Critique of Political

Economy. ("The general result" to "human history to a close.")
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/texts/marxpref.html
4. Choose the historical situation described in one of these three readings:
Readings
Karl Marx, "The British Rule in India," June 10, 1863, pp. 35-41.
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/marx1.pdf
Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, "Bourgeois and Proletarians," The

Communist Manifesto. (Esp., "The history of all" to "and of exchange.";
"The bourgeoisie" to "and its rule.")
http://www.marx.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-
manifesto/ch01.htm
Institute for the Study of the Science of Society, "Historical Materialism:

The Civil War in the United States," Institute Resource Paper #9.
Use that example from history to discuss the relation of quantity and quality in
change: How does the quantitative introduction of a new quality lead up to its
incompatibility with the old? In what part of the process does the quantity of
the new quality begin to grow? How does it finally become incompatible with
the old?
For specific reference on the concepts of quantity and quality, see:
Beth Gonzalez, "Our Philosophical Outlook and the Line of March."

(See section on quantity and quality.)
Frederick Engels, "II. Dialectics," Dialectics of Nature. ("It is therefore,

from the history" to "all his life without the slightest inkling of it.")
Nelson Peery, "The Dialectics of the Leap and the Destruction of

Capitalism." Entering an Epoch of Social Revolution (See especially
beginning of article to end of paragraph beginning "Each invading
quantity of the new quality." The article can be found at the end of the
Epoch pamphlet; pp. 31-35 in the print version.)
5. Through the quantitative stages of the leap, the introduction of a new

quality destroys the connections in society (e.g., between the capitalist class
and the working class). Discuss the significance of this for the preparation for
political revolution within the social revolution.

Michael Brand, "Dialectics, Complexity and the Crisis," 1996. ("The

conception of development" to "complexity and Marxist dialectics.")
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/discuss/dialectics/brand1.html
6. Why doesn't the intensification of the social struggle become the political
struggle for power? What does it mean to say we anticipate and rely on
objective aspects of the revolution in order to develop its subjective/conscious
side? Use the understanding of quantity and quality to discuss this.

Nelson Peery, "The Revolutionary Process," Entering an Epoch of
Social Revolution. (pp. 17-20 in the print version.)
Top of page
Previous: Contradiction and Antagonism Next: The Leap


The Leap
The Motion of Qualitative
Change
The Key to
Understanding Social
Revolution
4.
4.The
TheLeap
Leap
5. Polarization
We have seen that a new quality must be introduced for transformation to

begin. Yet even this process of transformation has its own motion which
revolutionaries must understand. This process is called the leap.
A leap is the motion of change from one quality to another. It is not a single
event, but a series of changes wherein one quality is replaced quantitatively,
or stage by stage, with another quality. What is single and sudden is the
break in continuity. It is highly chaotic and immensely unstable. It is the
process of the old quality being destroyed and the struggle to reorganize
around the new quality.
Today we can see this process in society unfolding before our eyes. The
introduction of the new quality – electronics – into production has begun a
leap in the economy. These new productive forces are increasingly coming
into conflict with the productive relations of society, laying the basis for a leap
in society and expressed as a social revolution. Institutions, ideas, and
relationships that once organized and gave meaning to society are disrupted
and torn from their moorings. The struggle to reorganize society around the
new productive forces is fought out within this social revolution.
The thinking of the masses of people -- if not necessarily each individual

person -- reflect the material conditions. Change these material conditions
and the masses of people become open to new ideas that conform to the
emerging new conditions. The direction and outcome of the leap is decided
by what people think and what they do about what they think.
Under these conditions, the subjective aspects become decisive. Therefore,

the task of revolutionaries is to guarantee that an intellectual leap takes place
as a reflection of the leap in the objective sphere. Revolutionary activity in the
spontaneous movement is no longer an end to itself. The practical movement
becomes the battleground for the struggle between the old and new ideas.
Our understanding of the quantitative development of the leap shows us the
necessity and the rhythm of preparing the masses of people, step by step, for
revolution.
1. What is the leap?
2. Discuss the two ideas of transformation addressed in the readings. What

are the political implications of the concept that change occurs by "degrees"?
What are some examples of this thinking? What are the political implications
of the concept that change occurs through a break in continuity, or leaps?
Readings
O. Kuusinen, "What is a leap?" Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism.

http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/leap.html
G. Plekhanov, "The Materialist Dialectic as Method," Fundamental

Problems of Marxism.
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/plekhanov2.html
F. Engels, "Natural Philosophy. The Organic World," Anti-Duhring.

("Despite all the gradualness" to "Hegel who has to correct Herr
Duhring.") http://www.marx2mao.org/M&E/AD78i.html#s2 (pp. 82-83)
Supplemental: J. Madeleine Nash, "When Life Exploded," Time,

December 4, 1995. (This article is available for purchase from the Time
web site at address below. It costs $2.50.)
3. How is the leap we are in today different from other leaps in history?
Compare "The End of Value" with the selection from The Communist
Manifesto and the excerpt from Capital. What similarities do you see?
Readings
Jim Davis, "The End of Value." (Institute disucssion paper)
K. Marx and F. Engels, "Bourgeois and Proletarians," The Communist

Manifesto.
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-
manifesto/index.htm
K. Marx, Part VII: "Primitive Accumulation, Historical Tendency of
Capitalist Accumulation." Capital, Vol. I. ("What does the primitive" to "a
few usurpers by the mass of the people.")
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch32.htm
4. Describe the "law system" of revolutionary work during the period of

capitalist stability. Discuss this in terms of quantitative development and
qualitative transformation.
5. Discuss the concept of stages of development of the leap. How does it

help us understand the process of the leap from one quality to another? What
does it tell us about how revolutionaries must approach their work?
6. Discuss the following: "Our task is to guarantee that an intellectual leap

takes place as a reflection of the leap in the objective sphere."
Readings
N. Peery, "The Process of Development," Entering an Epoch of Social

Revolution. (pp. 10-11 in published text)
N. Peery, "The Dialectics of the Leap and the Destruction of

Capitalism."
(The article can be found at the end of Epoch pamphlet, pp. 31-35 in
the print version)
Institute Resource Paper #3, "Why Things Change." (Section "How

[people] fight it out to establish new productive relations.")
Institute Resource paper # 6, "Revolution -- The Line of March."

Top of page
Previous: Quantity and Quality Next: Polarization


Polarization
The Destruction of the
Old Connections and the
Possibility for the New
Quality
5.Polarization
5. Polarization
6. Base and Superstructure
All phenomena are comprised of opposing poles which are mutually exclusive
and interdependent, and in contradiction. This polarity — the relation between
the two poles –- organizes them and makes them what they are, a quality.
Growth and development occurs as a result of the contradiction and struggle

between the two poles. The relation between the poles becomes more
contradictory within each stage of development, forcing the emergence of a
new stage.
Yet this process of growth and development is different from the process of
change and transformation. Change cannot come about simply by the poles
struggling and fighting one another. The process of the poles struggling and
fighting one another is the process of ongoing growth and development. The
process of change and transformation requires something else: the
introduction of a new quality which begins the process of destruction of the
old quality and the possibility of the formation of something new.
Polarization means the process of the opposing poles being wrenched apart
in an ongoing process which destroys that which holds them together and that
which made them what they were. Polarization begins with the introduction of
the new quality and makes possible the leap to a new quality, or in terms of
what we are looking at, a new society. They are not separate categories but
part of a long process of struggle, destruction, and transformation on a new
basis.
This is as true for the natural world as it is for society. In chemical reactions,
for example, the introduction of energy into the bond-forming electrons
causes the bond to rupture, creating "opportunities...for new bonds to form."
With the introduction of qualitatively new productive forces we see the

beginning of the destruction of the classes, the institutions and relationships
that developed on the old material basis. Every political revolution has been
characterized by polarization. As these relations are torn apart, the
"opportunity for new bonds to form" begins. Faced with the fraying bonds that
once held it together, all of society is pulled into the process. It is in such
times of motion and change that revolutionaries can play their historical role.
The concept of polarization holds profound lessons for revolutionaries.

Production without labor is forming a class with no ties to the capitalist
system. They cannot fight the capitalists in the same ways as they once did
because their connection to production is dissolving. This opens up the
possibility of politics on a new basis and, with it, the possibility of
reconstructing society on a new basis. It is the development of the new class
subjectively that makes the difference in the direction that society takes.
Conscious revolutionaries concentrate on developing the consciousness
about the actual process going on — what the problem is, a vision of what the
world could be, and a program for revolution to reconstruct society.
1. Describe the process of polarization. How is it set in motion?
2. Discuss the significance of polarization in the process of change in nature

and in society.
3. Why is it important for revolutionaries to understand the process of

polarization as it relates to the revolutionary process?
Readings
F. Engels, "Basic Forms of Motion," Dialectics of Nature. ("Heat, as

already stated" to "repelled from one to another.")
F. Engels, selection from Anti-Duhring. ("The mechanical theory" to

"obsolete and unsuitable.")
http://www.marx2mao.org/M&E/AD78i.html#s2 (pp.79-80)
"Chemical Reactions," excerpted from Encyclopedia Britannica Online.

http://www.britannica.com (full text available only through subscription)
4. Through looking at past revolutions we can examine the process of

polarization and how it plays out in the realm of society and politics. Using the
example of the French revolution, identify economic, social and political
polarization and the relationship between them. Look also at the role of ideas.
Compare that revolution to the revolutionary process today. What is the
same? What is different?
5. What does "politics" mean? What do we mean by "politics on a new

basis"? What are some of the blocks to this, and why? Give examples from
your own experience. What role will a class party play in the development of
this new kind of politics, and what is its relation to the reconstruction of
society?
Readings
Nelson Peery, "The Revolutionary Process," Entering an Epoch of

Social Revolution. (pp. 17-18; 19-20 in print version)
Nelson Peery, "Polarization - Basis for a Workers Party." (pp. 39-43 in

print version of Epoch pamphlet.The article is included at the end of the
Epoch pamphlet.
LRNA, Political Resolution, 2001. ("The ruling class acts as a class" to

end of document) http://www.lrna.org/doc.4/polres.html
LRNA, Political Report to the LRNA Steering Committee, "The Tasks of

the Comrades in the Mass Movement," May 2000.
http://www.lrna.org/texts/reports/pr00052.html
E.J. Hobsbawm, "The French Revolution," excerpt from The Age of

Revolution. http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/hobsbawm1.html
Top of page
Previous: The Leap Next: Base and Superstructure


Base and
Superstructure
Society – How and Why
Transformation is
Possible
6.Base
6. Baseand
andSuperstructure
Superstructure
7. The Making of History
A common misconception about Marxism is that it is "economic determinist."

That is, everything that happens in society is determined by the means of
production in some kind of automatic way. In their writings, Marx and Engels
showed the relation between the base of society and the edifice – the
superstructure – which arose upon that foundation. While they emphasized
the underlying role that the productive forces played in any process of social
change, all their writings are based on an understanding that political change
could only occur through the conscious intervention of human beings.
Let's look at this conceptual framework of base and superstructure a little

closer. The base of society is the way people relate to one another in the
production of their lives and their means of life, in other words, the productive
relations. Classes are an aspect of these productive relations. People do not
relate on just any basis. They relate to one another through their mutual
relation to property. This in turn defines the society. A state, a legal system,
social institutions, and ideas arise on this base. These elements make up
what we call the superstructure. The superstructure reflects, protects,
organizes and strengthens the base.
The leap in society begins with the introduction of qualitatively new productive
forces. The leap is a series of changes wherein one quality is replaced
quantitatively, or stage by stage, by another quality. Revolution is not simply
the overthrow of one class by another, but rather the disruption and
destruction of the entire society brought about by the introduction of the new
quality. The base begins to disintegrate, and new relationships struggle to be
born. New groups or new classes are created, unable to exist in the old
productive relations.
While a qualitative change in the productive forces begins the process of

destruction and polarization, it is the subjective element – consciousness –
which determines the final outcome of the social and political forms. The
Soviet Union and the US went through the same economic transition, but
there was no organization in the US – no subjective movement that was
capable of taking advantage of these changes in the same way as the
Bolsheviks did in Russia in the early 20th century. It is then, as Marx and
Engels pointed out, the complex and at times violent interplay of these
various forces that determine the outcome, not simply one side or the other of
the dialectic. In this sense, we can say that the character of productive
relations is determined by force during the leap or transition from one quality
to another. That is, by which class will command the political means of
control.
Today, as the relations that have held society together are destroyed, so too
is the relation between the bourgeoisie and the worker broken. The workers
can no longer fight the capitalists because labor-replacing technology is
breaking the connection to production. The struggle becomes one over the
political means of control.
Human beings, on the basis of their understanding, struggle and fight to

create a new society that conforms to what the new means of production
make possible. The outcome is not automatic. In the process of social
revolution, all kinds of ideas and movements are generated, each going
through the same process of polarization and dissolution. This is as true for
fascist ideas and movement as it is for communist.
Once again, the methodology of Marxism shows us the pivotal role that
revolutionaries can and must play in influencing the outcome of the leap
toward a society that is based on cooperation and a sharing of the fruits of
human civilization.
1. Discuss the concept of base and superstructure.
a.) What relations make up the base? Discuss the process through
which it is created. Use examples from the readings.
b.) What makes up the superstructure? Discuss the process through

which it is created. Why do Marx and Engels say "The ideas of the ruling
class are in every epoch the ideas of the ruling class?"
2. What misconceptions about base and superstructure were Engels and

Plekhanov attempting to straighten out? Why is this important?
Readings
F. Engels, "Morality and Law, Eternal Truths," Anti-Duhring. (From "If

then, we have not made" to "but also for cats!")
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1877/anti-duhring/ch07.htm
F. Engels to Joseph Bloch, September 1890.

http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1890/letters/90_09_21.htm
K. Marx to P.V. Annenkov, December 1846.
http://marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1846/letters/46_12_28.htm
K. Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. (From

"Legitimists and Orleanists" to "enthusiastic only about ground rent.")
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1852/18th-
brumaire/ch03.htm
K. Marx, "Preface" to the Contribution to the Critique of Political

Economy. ("The general result" to "human history to a close.")
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/texts/marxpref.html
G. Plekhanov, "Man and Necessity in History," Fundamental Problems

of Marxism, pp. 68-69. ("As we see Herr Bernstein" to "claiming to be a
science.") http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/plekhanov1.html
3. Discuss the different stages of history and the distinction between the
content of a time (manual to mechanical labor, etc.) and political forms
(communal, feudal, etc.). Why is it important to distinguish between these two
aspects? How does the example of Soviet society show that productive
forces do not determine property relations or the character of a society? How
does this show the interplay of the objective and the subjective aspects of the
process?
4. Discuss the concept that the character of the productive relations is not
determined by the productive forces, but is determined by force during the
leap or transition from one quality to another. What do we mean by force?
5. Discuss the conditions which shift the struggle from an economic struggle
to a political one. Why does this occur? Why does this open up the possibility
for revolutionaries to play their role?
Readings
K. Marx and F. Engels, "Bourgeois and Proletarians," The Communist

Manifesto. (From "The history of all hitherto existing society" to "political
sway of the bourgeoisie.")
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-
manifesto/index.htm
Change," Institute Resource Paper #3. (Section beginning "Basis and
Superstructure" to end of paper.)
Nelson, Peery, "Content of the Time" and "The Revolutionary Process,"

Entering an Epoch Social Revolution. (pp. 13-15; 17-20 in print version)
Top of page
Previous: Polarization Next: The Making of History

The Making of
History and the
Role of the
Individual
7.The
7. TheMaking
MakingofofHistory
History
8. New Epoch Calls for New Doctrine
In the class on base and superstructure, we saw how objective material

changes make certain changes in society possible and, at the same time, how
the direction and outcome of those changes isn't automatic. People fight out
and determine the resolution of those objective changes. The class struggle is
the struggle for the political power to determine the resolution of the material
changes. In this sense, it is people who determine the shape and direction
history takes.
The concept of the "role of the individual" defines the place of the individual
within the objective, material processes going on in the world and identifies his
or her active role in the process. The individual whose particular character
offers what is required of a given stage or moment of history moves history
forward, influences the forms it takes, and offers the context for the masses of
people to play their role in the making of history.
Recognition of the role of the individual in history is a statement of

responsibility. It calls on each individual to understand the material changes
and the laws inherent in them, and it underlines the importance of
consciousness in the revolutionary process. It calls on each of us to play our
role in determining the direction and outcome of change.
Appreciating how history is made and the role of the individual is especially
important today, when society is in a profound leap from one material basis to
another. In such a leap, the old material foundations for social relationships,
institutions and people’s thinking are destroyed. But the outcome of this
destruction – the construction of the new — depends on the consciousness
and conscious action of people. Today, the development of labor-replacing
methods of production is an antagonism to capitalist relations of production. It
sets the basis for an objective movement whose actual – though not
necessarily conscious – aim is the communist reconstruction of society.
Developing the communist ideology of an objectively communist movement is
the order of the day. Those revolutionaries with the understanding, inclination
and passion to develop that communist ideology on a mass scale play the
essential role in moving history forward.
Readings
Institute for the Study of the Science of Society, "Revolutionaries – The

Role of the Individual," Institute Resource Paper #5.
Frederick Engels to Heinz Starkenburg, January 25, 1894.

George Plekhanov, excerpt from The Materialist Conception of History.

http://www.marxists.org/archive/plekhanov/works/1890s/history/part1.htm
George Plekhanov, "Section III" and "Section VIII," The Role of the
Individual in History. http://art-bin.com/art/oplecheng.html (Sections III
and VIII)
George Plekhanov, "Man and Necessity in History," Fundamental

Problems of Marxism, pp. 66-70.
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/plekhanov1.pdf
Frederick Engels, "Causality" and "Reciprocal Action," Dialectics of

Nature, pp. 144-146.
Frederick Engels to Joseph Bloch, September 21, 1890.

Readings strongly suggested – at least for reports:
Michio Kaku, Visions — How Science Will Revolutionize the 21st

Century, Bantam Books, 1998, Chapter 1.
Henry Mayer, "Preface," All on Fire – William Lloyd Garrison and the
Abolition of Slavery, New York: St. Martins Griffen, 1998.
1. Discuss Engels' and Hegel's definition of "freedom."
2. What's the difference between "automatic" and "inevitable"?
3. The development of the productive forces is the underlying, general cause

of the historical progress of humanity. What is the role of the individual in
history? (For this question, have someone do a report on Henry Mayer,
"Preface," All on Fire - William Lloyd Garrison and the Abolition of Slavery.)
4. Engels says that "freedom is also a product of historical development."

What does that mean, and what kind of "freedom" is possible today? (For this
question, have someone do a report on Michio Kaku, Visions — How Science
Will Revolutionize the 21st Century, Chapter 1.)
5. Plekhanov says that the "history we make is the history of our own social
relations." Discuss what that means.
Top of page
Previous: Base and Superstructure Next: New Epoch / New Doctrine


New Epoch
Calls for New
Doctrine
8.
8.New
NewEpoch
EpochCalls
Callsfor
forNew
NewDoctrine
Doctrine
For revolutionaries, doctrine is a general policy or set of principles that guides

political activity to accomplish a definite political goal. But doctrine isn’t just a
subjective choice. It is based on the conclusions of the science of society: a
definition of the specific set of inherent, objective laws that govern the
objective process you are dealing with and how the operation of those laws is
manifested in changes in society. Science allows us to understand the world.
Doctrine is a guide to changing it.
Developing and using doctrine to define and shape the work of

revolutionaries depends on a philosophical understanding of how change
takes place: Change doesn’t come about through a mechanical increase or
decrease of numbers or intensity. Qualitative change depends on the
introduction of something new into an ongoing process. The outcome of
material, objective changes in society depends on the consciousness and
conscious activity of people.
The epoch Marx and Engels (and many others after them) wrote about was
defined by the shift from an agrarian society to an industrial society. Our
epoch is defined by the electronic revolution and the beginning of laborless
production. It is different in fundamental ways from the past epoch.
In the period Marx and Engels described, the clash between the social
character of production and the private ownership of the means of production
expressed itself in various economic crises within capitalism. Marx and Engels
rallied their comrades to take advantage of every economic and political crisis
in order to advance their class and political goals. But crisis in their epoch
was a product of the internal contradictions of capitalism, contradictions that
moved capitalism ahead. Quantitative changes within capitalism could
resolve or overcome those crises.
Today we face something qualitatively different. The beginning of production

without labor (that is, the beginning of valueless production) represents the
emergence of an antagonism that is external to capitalism (which is defined
by the buying and selling of labor power). Today it is not so much the social
character of production, but more so the beginning of a new quality –
"laborless" production – that clashes with capitalist forms of private property.
Marx and Engels faced a situation in which the interests of the working class
were opposed to those of the capitalist class, but the working class was
locked into the system defined by the interdependence of the two hostile
classes. The connections between the capitalist class and the working class
were growing and strengthening. By contrast, today new methods of
production are undermining and destroying those connections. The back-and-
forth struggle between the working class and the capitalist class cannot
reform the capitalist system to solve the questions of the day. Thus, today we
face the social consequences of a system in the process of destruction – not
the growing pains of an expanding and developing system.
The universal and timeless responsibility of revolutionaries is to develop the

subjective aspects of the revolutionary process. Doctrine is a general guide
for carrying out this responsibility and advancing the revolution along its line
of march. The emergence of a new epoch calls for the development of new
doctrine.
Readings
Institute for the Study of the Science of Society, "New Epoch Calls for
New Doctrine," Institute Resource Paper #10.
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/doctrine.html
Some Useful Definitions – Reference for "New Epoch calls for New
Doctrine."
http://www.scienceofsociety.org/philo/texts/doctrine.definitions.html
V.I. Lenin, Excerpt from Karl Marx. ("Motion, in its turn" to "twenty years
concentrated.") http://www.marx2mao.org/Lenin/KM14.html#KM4 (p. 41)
1. Discuss the relation between "science" and "doctrine."
2. What is the difference between Marx's epoch and ours? Discuss this in
relation to the difference between, on the one hand, contradiction as the basis
for quantitative stages of growth and, on the other hand, antagonism as the
basis for the process of the leap from one quality to another.
3. From the standpoint of the discussion of point #2, why does a new epoch
call for new doctrine? Discuss the difference between Marx's doctrine of the
class struggle and today's doctrine of the leap.
4. Compare a conception like "unite to fight the right" with a dialectical

conception of how change takes place. What does this mean for doctrine in
this epoch?
Top of page
Previous: The Making of History


A Study Guide For Communist Revolutionaries

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Study Guide For Communist Revolutionaries

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Study Guide For Communist Revolutionaries

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Contents

Dedication and Acknowledgments

1. Dialectical and Historical Materialism and the importance of

2. Contradiction and Antagonism: the basis for two kinds of change

4. The Leap: the motion of qualtitative change, the key to understanding

5. Polarization: the destruction of the old connections and the possibility

6. Base and Superstructure: Society - how and why transformation is

7. The Making of History and the role of the individual

8. New Epoch Calls for New Doctrine

Home | Schools | Study Groups | Under Discussion | Forums | About ISSS

Institute for the Study of the Science of Society

In memory of Sue Ying,

Marxist Philosophy: A Study Guide for Revolutionaries in the Age of

Much of the study in philosophy summed up here pre-dates the formation of

Although the objective economic processes referred to in some of the classes

Previous: Contents Next: Introduction

Institute for the Study of the Science of Society

Helpful terms and concepts

The following excerpt from Anti-Duhring, by Frederick Engels, shows Engels’

Marxist philosophy and revolutionaries

The complexities of history point to the importance of Marxist philosophy for

We want to make every possible contribution to the continuity of the study of

Therefore, this Study Guide is aimed at the study of philosophy as the

a framework for the continuing development of the science, doctrine and

We revolutionaries today have new territory to chart, new challenges to figure

Consciousness compels, motivates and directs action; action completes or

What do we mean by "ideology"? There are many different definitions and

Scope of this Study Guide -- themes in philosophy

For example, the Industrial Revolution ushered in a whole new stage of

An understanding of the motion of change also sharpened our grasp of the

The challenge of developing doctrine

What is doctrine and why is it so important to revolutionaries? Doctrine is a

Today, the beginning of the application of electronics to production is

As a set of principles that guide revolutionaries’ work, doctrine has to align to

Besides aligning to the particular quality of the social revolution we are

Many principles commonly accepted and followed by revolutionaries don't

How to use the Study Guide

Next: Dialectical and Historical

Institute for the Study of the Science of Society

This class will provide a basic overview of the principles of dialectical

Dialectical and historical materialism is the philosophical approach of

Nature is an integrated and connected whole. Phenomena are

Nature is in a state of constant change: development, disintegration,

Internal contradiction, the basis of quantitative development, is inherent

Changes are from lower to higher order and occur as negations.

Qualitative changes occur by a quantitative extraction from the quality or

Quantitative developments are definite and indispensable.

Historical materialism is the extension of the principles of dialectical

The practical significance of the principles of dialectical and historical

An understanding of causality allows revolutionaries to draw political

Joseph Stalin, "Dialectical and Historical Materialism," Problems of

O. Kuusinen, ed., Excerpt from Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism, pp.

2. What is the basic principle of materialism? of historical materialism?

Previous: Introduction Next: Contradiction and Antagonism

Institute for the Study of the Science of Society

What, then, accounts for fundamental, or qualitative, change?

Qualitative changes, however, occur only by quantitative extraction from the

In contrast to dialectics, the metaphysical conception sees nature as an