The Silver Bulletin
The Silver Bulletin
The Silver Bulletin
An Open Paper By
BILL MEDINA
Post Office Box 70400
Sunnyvale, California, U.S.A.
Postal Zone: 94086-0400
REFERENCES
Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition. (Hereinafter: Black's, Page _____.)
Bouvier's Law Dictionary and Concise Encyclopedia, Third revision (Eighth Edition) 1914, ISBN 0-8994-335-8,
(Hereinafter: B ouvier's Volume _____, Page _____.)
Constitution FOR the United States of America (hereinafter: by Article or Amendment), in pari materia with the
California Constitution pursuant to Article III, Section 1 thereof. The Supreme Court on ABROGATION OF RIGHT S:
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491 (1966).
The Supreme Court on COMMON-LAW PLEA TO JURISDICTION: Roberts v. Lewis 144 U.S. 653:
The Supreme Court on the COURTS OF STAR CHAMBER: Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 The Supreme Court on
JURISDICTION: Maxfield's Lessee v. Levy 4 U.S. 308, 311, 312 (1797). The Supreme Court on RIGHTS OF
CONTRACT: Hale v. Henkel, 20 U.S. 43, 74-75 (1906)
PART 1
STATUS
"The status of an individual us ed as a legal term, means the legal position of the individual in or with regard to the rest of
the community. L. R. 4 P.D. 11. The rights, duties, capacities and incapacitates which determine a person to a given class,
constitutes his status; Campb. Austin 137. ... ... The action of assumpsit must be reckoned a technical instrument which
gave no small help to the forces which were making for the tran sition from status to contract; 3 Holdsw. Hist. E. L. 349."
Bouvier's Volume 3, page 3129.
MAJOR PREMISE
NATURE'S GOD Created Mankind, Mankind created Constitutions, Constitutions created governments created Rules,
Codes, Regulations, and/or Statutes (hereinafter called Enactments), most of which are nefariously Executed and Applied
as some government -sponsored Court - Crime -Revenue Raising-Activity.
ARGUMENT - SUMMARY
The general requirement that "... the burden is on the defendant to show the nonexistence of Jurisdictional facts; Russell v.
Butler, (Tex.civ App.) 47 S.W.406; Gilchrist v. Oil Land Co., 21 W.Va.115, 45 Am.Rep.555.", (Bouvier's Volume 2,
Page 1763), is resolved by Article VI which defines exactly Who is subject to the Jurisdicti on of the Constitution, and
exactly Who shall be Contractually Bound by Oath or Affirmation to support Such Constitution in Consideration for
Offices Of Public Trust and those Benefits of Public Service and Public Employment. "... The Senators and
Representative before menti oned, and the members of the several State Legislatures, and all executives and judicial
Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this
Constitution; ..." Article VI
Since the intent of Article VI is to define exactly to Whom the Constitutional Jurisdiction applies; since the fact exists that
THE PEOPLE are excluded from the requirements of Article VI, prima facie; See: INCLUSIO UNIS ES T EXCLUSIO
ALTERIUS: Black's, Page 687; since no presumption that THE PEOPLE are subject to the Jurisdiction of the
Constitution is, or can be made; since all Constitutions are considered in pari materia with all other Constitutions; since all
Constitutions are subject to the provisions of Article VI; since no Constitution operates on THE PEOPLE at-large by
virtue of the fact that THE PEOPLE are excluded from the requirements of Article VI, et sqq; then in pursuing His
occupations of Common-Right, the Individual has made no Oath or Affirmation supporting any Constitution, and He is
not subject to any Constitutional Jurisdictions.
CONCLUSION - SUMMARY
If The Individual is not subject to any Constitutional Jurisdictions, He is also not subject to any Enactment made by any
Constitutionally Created Legislature;
if He is not subject to any Constitutional Jurisdictions, He is also not subject to any Jurisdiction presumed by any
Constitutionally Created Executive Branch of Government; and if He is not subject to any Constitutional Jurisdictions, He
is also not subject to any Jurisdiction presumed by any Constitutionally Created Judiciary.
In the complete absence of any Lawful and verified Oath or Affirmation made by a Nonparticipant Individual, to support
any Constitution; or in the complete absence of proving a Higher Title to that Property Known and Described as the
Nonparticipant Individual Himself, In Personam Jurisdiction does not exist; and
in the complete absence of proving a Lawf ul and voluntary contract made by Such Nonparticipant, pledging Himself
and/or His Property- Rights to certain specified performance, Subject Matter Jurisdiction does not exist; and
in the complete absence of any Lawful and verified complaint made against Such Nonparticipant, wherein a Real Injured
Party Cl aims a Damage, no criminal Jurisdictions exist; thus
in the complete absence of proving the existence of either In Personam and or Subject Matter Jurisdiction, governmental
Jurisdiction over the Nonparticipant Individual does not exist. QUOD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM.
TORT REMEDY
Every Act perpetrated by any Constitutional Created Branch of government while absent Jurisdiction; every Such Act
being required to be made unlawfully under Forces of Arms; and every Such act having been made without probable
cause; then, every Such Act is required to have been made as a Trespass, and/or other Tort upon a Nonparticipant
Individual, and shall constitute a Case to be pursued against the Perpetrator in an Action At Law for the recovery of
Damages.
PART 2
To better understand the Jurisdictional Argument, We are first presenting a thumb-nail sketch of:
HISTORY
The Revolutionary War was principally financed by "Old-World" International Banking Interests (hereinafter called
Federalists), Who had made Substantial Investments into the Colonies for the purposes of making Profits and Gains
through Thei r Imports into, and their Exports from the Colonies, where All Such Trade was conducted in International
Commerce under the Laws of Nations (in the Admiralty Jurisdiction).
Having been the Powers behind the Thrones and Churches throughout mo st of "Civilized" History, The Federalists
Conspired to establish a Strong Central "Sovereign" Juri sdiction in the New Colonies to facilitate Their Control over the
Colonists themselves as Feudal Lords of Their Private Lands.
Yielding to those Economic Pressures to establ ish an Area in which International Commerce could be conducted pursuant
to the Laws of Nati ons (Admiralty), the Colonists established a Ten Mile Square (approximately., 3.2 miles x 3.2 miles)
ADMIRALTY ZONE to be the Seat of the Admiralty Government of the United States.
SEDITION BY SYNTAX ("United States" DOES NOT mean "United States of America" or "the Several States")
The aforesaid Admiralty Zone, now called Washi ngton, D.C., is analogous to the Thirteen Block Section known as
"London Town" which was established approximately 1066 A.D., under William the Conqueror, which IS NOT part of
Great Britain proper, and which operates principally in the Admiralty Jurisdiction.
Just as "London Town" IS NOT part of Great Britain proper, Washington, D.C., IS NOT part of the several United States
of America, and Washington, D.C., was created by Cession of particular States, and by the acceptance of Congress, to
become th e Seat of the Government of the United States. See Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution and the
"United States" as defined in Title 18 U.S.C. Section 5, "Title" 26 U.S.C. Section 3121(e)(2), and Title 28 U.S.C. Section
1603(c).
In 1790 the PUBLIC DEBT was 75 Millions of Dollars-by-Weight of Gold or Silver, and on or about 1790, the First
National Bank was given a Twenty (20) Year Charter.
By 1792, "worthless as a continental" was commonly used to describe those bitter Private Loss- Experiences connected
the "The Continental Dollar" , issued by the United States in Its Federal Admiralty Jurisdiction under the General
Auspices and Control of the Said Federalists. This technique enable the Federalists to draw-off THE PEOPLES' Wealth
replacing it with PAPER.
On April 2, 1792, the Congress (of the several States) passed The Coinage Act of 1792, Such Act exactly compelling the
United States to Perform in accordance with Article I, Section 8, Clause 5
of the Constitution, by Prohibiting the United States from issuing PAPER Currency at any time in the future.
In or about 1810, the Congress refused to renew the Federalists' National Banking Charter. In or about 1812, the
Federalists declared War on the United States.
In or about 1815, the Second National Bank was given a twenty (20) year Charter. In 1815, the court in the case of De
Lovio v. Boit, 7 Fed. Cases Number 3, 776 stated that: "A policy of Insurance is a maritime contract, and therefore of
Admiralty Jurisdiction." In 1835, the Public Debt was 38 thousands of Dollars-by-weight of Gold or Silver, THE
LOWEST EVER.
In 1836, President Andrew Jackson forced the closing of the Second Bank of the U.S. by revoking Its Charter. He is said
to have been met by the Money Changers Who approached Him in the Drawing Room of the White House, whereupon
The President is said to have stated: "Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that
you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits
amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and
annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go
on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined
to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out!"
At the time of the Second Session of the 36th Congress in 1861, while absent a significant PUBLIC DEBT, the Federalists
had failed to procure Jurisdiction over all of the Property contained within the several States by Rights of Debt through
Contractural Banking Obligations. Finding Themselves unable to Lawfully Manipul ate Credit and Monetary Policy to
Their own Gains, Advantages, and Benefits, the Federali sts' United States joined in Collusion and Conspiracy with
Certain of the several States, and with Certain Foreign Powers under the General Auspices and Control of the Said
Federalists, to Commit Treason by Unlawfully Declaring War on Those Lawfully Constituted Governments of the United
States of America, Such War being for the Singular Purpose of Overthrowing the Aforesaid Lawful Jurisdictions by
Forces-Of-Arms, in a "CIVIL" Counterrevoluti on for the Purposes of Imposing Federal Admiralty Jurisdiction Upon
Each of the United States of America, and upon Each of THE PEOPLE habitat therein.
In 1863, in order to finance Their "CIVIL" Counterrevolutionary Activities, the Federalists passed The National Currency
Act of February 25, 1863, Such Act providing for the Issue of Commercial Paper Currency Secured by a Pledge of United
States' Stocks, and the Act provided for "circulation and redemption thereof". S ee The Story of Money, Third Edition
(1981), published by: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 33 Liberty Street, New York, N.Y., U.S.A., Postal Zone:
10045.
"The Federal Government couldn't raise enough money to pay for the Civil War through bond sales and taxes. As rapidly
as the treasury paid bills with gold and silver coin, the metal was hoarded. Reluctantly, Congress issued paper money --
U.S. notes -- that wasn't redeemable in gold or silver. Congress tried making the notes acceptable by declaring them "legal
tender", which meant that they had to be accepted in payment of all private debts. The government also began chartering
"national banks" which were given paper currency they could issue as their own. State banks were stopped from issuing
notes. National banks received currency in proportion to the amount of Government bonds they purchased."
This technique allowed the Federalists to draw-off THE PEOPLES' Wealth replacing it with PAPER.
On December 18, 1865, the Congres s enacted the Thirteenth Article Amendment abolishing Involuntary Servitude while
leaving VOLUNTARY Servitude to Contract in its place. By 1866, the Counterrevolution had been successful, the United
States had won, the United States of America had fallen and were held hostage, Federal Jurisdiction and Martial Law had
been Imposed, the Federal Monarchy had been installed, and the Public Debt, which was soon to become unquestionable,
had attained a value of 2.7 Billions of Dollars-by-Weight of gold or silver.
In July of 1868, the Federalists made Their Declaration of United States Jurisdiction in the form and manner of the
Fourteenth Article Amendment to The Constitution for the United States of America. Section 1. "All persons born or
naturalized in the United States, and subject to the Jurisdiction thereof, are Citizens of the United States ...", and Section
4. "The validity of the public debt of the United States ... shall not be questioned." (Emphasis added)
While the Thirteenth Amendment abolished PRIVATE ownership of PEOPLE, the Fourteenth Amendment made possible
the PUBLIC ownership of PERSONS. In or about 1870, under the banner of the Census or Enumeration directed to be
taken within every subsequent Term of ten Years, the formal practice of Birth Registration was begun, thereafter
Recording Births in the Bureau Of The Census, Department of Commerce.
In 1884, in Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421, the Supreme Court upheld the United States in reneging on Its Promise To
Redeem Its Paper by allowing Its Money Trust to enter a silent interpleader, whereupon Judicial Notice was taken of a
Third Party Contract resulting from Julliard using His Commercial Paper Currency as security in a Transaction for his 100
Bales of Cotton thus promoting the practice if Discharging Debt by Obligatory Notes instead of Tendering Payment for
Debt in Lawful and Substantive Money in Dollars- by-Weight of gold or silver.
In 1897, the Supreme Court in the case of The Glide, 167 U.S. 623, stated that:
"The Admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction conferred by the Constitution and laws of the United States upon the District
Courts of the United States is exclusive."
In 1904, the court in the case of Dailey v. New York, 128 F. 789, stated that:
Jurisdiction attaches in case of a maritime contract irrespective of the question whether it is to be performed on land or
water."
In 1907, there was an economic depression.
On February 25, 1913, Secretary of State Knox Falsely and Fraudulently Certified that the Sixteenth Article Amendment
to the Constitution had been Lawfully Ratified.
IT SHOULD BE NOTICED that The Sixteenth Article Amendment did not REPEAL those Restrictions Imposed on the
United States by Articl e I, Section 2, Clause 3, or Article I, Section 8, Clause 1; pursuant to those Di rectives of Article
V. Even if it were valid by having been properly ratified, The Sixteenth Article Amendment amended ab solutely nothing
pertaining to the several States or the Inhabitants thereof.
The Congress, being well aware of these Facts, never ENABLED The Sixteenth Amendment as Public Law by
Appropriate Legislation, in that the Amendment did not REPEAL the aforesaid Restrictions, and the Internal Revenue
Code ("Title" 26 U.S.C.) which is predicated upon the Sixteenth Amendment, is now, and has always been, "Private Law"
based upon Public Commercial (Contractual) Law. See Amendment XXI, ratified December 5, 1933, for the Construction
of a "REPEAL".
SEDITION BY SYNTAX ("Public DOES NOT mean "Private".)
More-often-than-not, Public Commercial Law has been called, "PUBLIC LAW" where It is in- fact, Public Commercial
Law regulating Private Commercial Contracts and Interests in Equity and Contractual Performance made within the
Admiralty Jurisdiction.
Presumably, on April 8, 1913, the several States "VOLUNTARILY" surrendered, and Consented to Deprive Themselves
of, Their Rights of Suffrage by the Imposition of the Seventeenth Article Amendment to the Constitution, Such
Amendment being an Abrogation of the Intent, Directive, Legal Construction, and Relevant Structural Conditions set
forth in Article I, Section 3, and in Article V providing that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of Its Equal
Suffrage in the Senate.
IT SHOULD BE NOTICED that When THE PEOPLE of the several States Chartered the United States as an Admiralty
Jurisdiction, it WAS NOT the Legislative intent of the September 1787 Congress to put into effect a self-destruct
mechanism, Such as could possibly make a Proposed Constitutional Amendment to the several States, where, upon Its
Ratification through any mechanism, the Constitutional Prohibitions regulating the United States would somehow cease to
exist.
The Congress Itself, has never had the Power to modify The Very Constitution that Created the Congress Itself (Article I,
Section 8), and any lawful modification done by way of Amendment, can only be made through the Legislature of three-
fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three-fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may
be proposed by the Congress.
The Congress has been Delegated only those Seventeen (17) Powers enumerated in Article I, Section 8. All other Powers
NOT vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof, are
specifically reserved to THE PEOPLE for Their exercise of Primary Jurisdiction over Thei r Respective Governments.
See the Tenth Article Amendment to the Constitution FOR the United States of America.
The Silver Bulletin 11 / 21 SEDITION BY SYNTAX ("Department of the Treasury" DOES NOT mean "United States Treasury
Department".)
Upon making the foregoing UNDECLARED "declaration of bankruptcy", the Federalists' Congress began
CONVERTING those ALLODIAL LAND TITLES that were Privately Owned by THE PEOPLE, At-Large.
In June of 1933, the Pennsylvania State Legislature pledged the privately owned Allodial Land Titles belonging to THE
PEOPLE of the State of Pennsylvania, as security for Its portion of the PUBLIC DEBT (Penn. PL 111). Also see
California Government Code Section 126 generally, and specifically Section 126(c). The result of pledging Such Title s as
Security for a perpetual PUBLIC DEBT is: that upon Default by the United States, Ownership of the "Pledged" Land will
revert to "Public" Federalist Control in satisfaction of Their "Public Debt".
After Fraudulently Pledging Such Titles in which the United States had NO LAWFUL INTEREST, The Congress soon
thereafter, began another of Its "borrowing-spending" sprees designed to spend-out the Values of those Privately Owned
Land Titles.
In August of 1933, an Executive Order Issued maki ng it illegal for private Americans to own or trade in gold.
On December 5, 1933, The Eighteenth Article Amendment, having fulfilled Its designed purposes, was REPEALED by
the Twenty-first Article Amendment, and like the Eleventh, Twelfth, Fourteenth, Sixteenth, Seventeenth, Eighteenth,
Twentieth, Twenty-Second, and Twenty-Fifth Amendments, the Twenty-First Article Amendment was never ENABLED
as Public Law by Appropriate Legislation.
In 1934, the Federalists passed The 1934 Gold Re serve Act which Proclaimed that gold could not be used as a medium of
domestic exchange , and made it illegal for private Americans or firms to own Gold Bullion. This the Act effectively
withdrew all remaining Gold from Monetary Circulation by requiring that it be tendered to the Federal Government.
Additionally, the Act also restricted private ownership of gold to those who must use gold for industrial or export
purposes (a restriction that was rescinded as of December 31, 1974).
Once again the average Man-on-the-street was lead to believe that the Paper One Dollar Silver Certificate that he held in
his left hand, was of the same Redemption Value as the Silver Dollar that He held in his Right.
The Gold Reserve Act was enforced under the Police Powers of the United States by the Internal Revenue Service, and
Those who failed to relinquish, or refused to tender Their Gold to the Federal Government in exchange for Its Paper, were
faced with the confiscation of Their Property, Arrest, Trial, Fines, penalties, and/or Imprisonment.
In 1935 the Social Security (old-age retirement) "Insurance" Act (49 Stat 620) was created by the Congress providing:
1.for the establishment of the Social Security Board; 2.for the issue of a Social Security Account Number to those who
VOLUNTEERED to "Join The March To Soci al Security"; 3.that Such Social Security Account Number was, on its face,
"NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES"; and 4.that One would VOLUNTARILY have one-half of one percent
(0.005) of
PART 3
Part 1 of this SILVER BULLETIN series dealt with the fact that PEOPLE of Common-Right are not bound by conditions
of any constitutions.
Part 2 of the series described:
the historical facts surrounding the formation of the foreign federal admiralty jurisdiction (D.C.); the violent counter-
revolution overthrowing the constitutionally established governments of the several States of the American Union, the
establishment of a new constitutional monarchy; the unmitigated theft of private property, and; MOST IMPORTANTLY,
that ALL Insurance is a maritime contract, and therefore Admiralty Jurisdiction, wherein Jurisdiction attaches in case of a
maritime contract irrespective of the question whether it is to be perf ormed on land or water.
BACKGROUND
AS NATURE'S GOD CREATED MANKIND and established His Right therein, then that Mankind exists, compels the
presumption juris et de jure, that Mans' Rights to Live and His Rights to defend His Life began as a genetic heritage which
successfully existed and operated through Millenniums dating the inception of the Time Continuum itself; thus all of
Mans' Right predate His Instruments, and Mankinds' Rights to Life, His Rights to defend His Life, and His Rights of
TITLE-TO-SELF have existed long antecedent to the formation of all constitution, and of all other such Instruments. See
"juris et de jure" Blacks 5th, page 767.
Accordingly, THE PEOPLE are the Lawful Heirs to Hereditaments, both Corporeal and Incorporeal, by Hereditary
Succession, inclusive of the Highest Titles to those individual Properties known and described as THE PEOPLE
Themselves, Sui Juris.
Likewise the fact that THE PEOPLE physically exist as Human Li fe Forms, clearly establishes Their Rights to Live,
Their Self-Rights of TITLE-TO-SELF, and Their Rights to defend Their Lives which began, existed, and successfully
operated through Their individual Genetic Linages and Heritages, wherein all such Rights have existed long antecedent to
the formation of any constitution; consequently, THE PEOPLE are required to make NO CLAIMS for any so-called
"rights" that might have been accidently enumerated or stipulated to in the Text(s) of any such Instrument.
As Instruments, Mankind created constitutions, or Social Contracts or Compacts, thereby created governments. See
"Social Contracts or Compacts", Black's 5th, Page 1246.
PART 3.1
JURISDICTION or WHO OWNS WHOM?
JURISDICTION
"The word is a term of large and comprehensive import, and embraces every kind of judicial action. ... It is the authority
by which courts and judicial officers take cognizance of and decide case. ... The legal right by which judges exerci se their
authority. ... It exist when court has cognizance of class of cases involved, proper parties are present, and point to be
decided is within powers of court. ... power and authority of a court to hear and determine a judicial proceeding. ... The
right and power of a court to adjudicate concerning the subject matter of a given case." Black's 5th, page 766.
Notice the words: "authority", "l egal right", "powers" of court, "power" and "authority" of a court, "right" and "power" of
a court ... .
PROPERTY.
"That which is peculiar or proper to any person; that which bel ongs exclusively to one; in the strict legal sense, an
aggregate of rights which are guaranteed and protected by the government. The term is said to extend to every species of
valuable right and interest. More specifically, ownership; the unrestricted and exclusive right to a thing; the right to
dispose of a thing in every legal way, to possess it, to use it, and to exclude every one else from interfering with it. That
dominion or indefinite ri ght of use or disposition which one may lawfully exercise over particular things or subjects. The
exclusive right of possessing, enjoying, and disposing of a thing. The highest right a man can have to anything; bei ng
used for that right which one has to lands or tenements, goods or chattels, which no way depends on another man's
courtesy. The word is also commonly used to denote everything which is the subject of ownership, corporeal or
incorporeal, tangible or intangible, visible or invi sible, real or personal; everything that has an exchangeable value or
which goes to makeup wealth or estate. It extends to every species of valuable right and interest, and includes real and
personal property, easements, franchises, and incorporeal hereitaments.
"Black's Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, page 1382.
From the above definition of "Property", it would appear that California has somehow managed to become the Legal
Owner of the Nonparticipant Individual's Property .
How then, did California obtain Title to the Said Private Property?
If California Incorporated were to claim Title to the Public Rights Of Way. Such Rights-Of-Way would have become
Private Privileges of way.
The Facts remain that these Properties have either originated as Private Toll Roads or as Highways in the Public Domain
long antecedent to the formation of California itself. How then did California obtain Titles to the Said Private and Public
Properties?
Now if it were presumed that a "crime" were committed, Who and Where is the Victim, damaged Party, or Real and
actual Party-of-Interest?
If it is presumed that California, in Its Corporate Capacity, were somehow damaged by way of some Nonparticipant
Individual' s nonadherence to selected Legi slative Enactments, how then was California Incorporated actual ly damaged
and to what extent?