Scribd
Upload
145 views

Quasi Delicts Versus Delicts

This document discusses criminal negligence and the distinction between quasi-delicts and delicts under Philippine law. It outlines the penalties for reckless and simple imprudence depending on whether the act would have constituted a grave, less grave, or light felony if intentional. For acts resulting only in property damage, the penalty is a fine relative to the damages caused. The provisions do not apply when the regular penalty is equal to or lower than those stated, or in cases of death by vehicle accident due to imprudence or negligence. Responsibility for fault or negligence under criminal law is separate from civil liability for negligence.

Uploaded by

Erly Mae
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
145 views

Quasi Delicts Versus Delicts

This document discusses criminal negligence and the distinction between quasi-delicts and delicts under Philippine law. It outlines the penalties for reckless and simple imprudence depending on whether the act would have constituted a grave, less grave, or light felony if intentional. For acts resulting only in property damage, the penalty is a fine relative to the damages caused. The provisions do not apply when the regular penalty is equal to or lower than those stated, or in cases of death by vehicle accident due to imprudence or negligence. Responsibility for fault or negligence under criminal law is separate from civil liability for negligence.

Uploaded by

Erly Mae
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

QUASI DELICTS VERSUS DELICTS

ARTICLE 2177, CIVIL CODE


CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE

Art. 365. Imprudence and negligence. Any person who, by reckless
imprudence, shall commit any act which, had it been intentional, would constitute
a grave felony, shall suffer the penalty of arresto mayor in its maximum period to
prision correccional in its medium period; if it would have constituted a less grave
felony, the penalty of arresto mayor in its minimum and medium periods shall be
imposed; if it would have constituted a light felony, the penalty of arresto menor
in its maximum period shall be imposed.

Any person who, by simple imprudence or negligence, shall commit an act which
would otherwise constitute a grave felony, shall suffer the penalty of arresto
mayor in its medium and maximum periods; if it would have constituted a less
serious felony, the penalty of arresto mayor in its minimum period shall be
imposed.

When the execution of the act covered by this article shall have only resulted in
damage to the property of another, the offender shall be punished by a fine
ranging from an amount equal to the value of said damages to three times such
value, but which shall in no case be less than twenty-five pesos.

A fine not exceeding two hundred pesos and censure shall be imposed upon any
person who, by simple imprudence or negligence, shall cause some wrong which,
if done maliciously, would have constituted a light felony.

In the imposition of these penalties, the court shall exercise their sound discretion,
without regard to the rules prescribed in Article sixty-four.

The provisions contained in this article shall not be applicable:

1. When the penalty provided for the offense is equal to or lower than those
provided in the first two paragraphs of this article, in which case the court shall
impose the penalty next lower in degree than that which should be imposed in
the period which they may deem proper to apply.

2. When, by imprudence or negligence and with violation of the Automobile Law,
to death of a person shall be caused, in which case the defendant shall be
punished by prision correccional in its medium and maximum periods.
Reckless imprudence consists in voluntary, but without malice, doing or falling to
do an act from which material damage results by reason of inexcusable lack of
precaution on the part of the person performing of failing to perform such act,
taking into consideration his employment or occupation, degree of intelligence,
physical condition and other circumstances regarding persons, time and place.

Simple imprudence consists in the lack of precaution displayed in those cases in
which the damage impending to be caused is not immediate nor the danger
clearly manifest.

The penalty next higher in degree to those provided for in this article shall be
imposed upon the offender who fails to lend on the spot to the injured parties
such help as may be in this hand to give. (As amended by R.A. 1790, approved
June 21, 1957).

ARTICLE 365, RPC
Art. 2177. Responsibility for fault or negligence under the preceding article is entirely separate and
distinct from the civil liability arising from negligence under the Penal Code. But the plaintiff cannot
recover damages twice for the same act or omission of the defendant. (n)

You might also like