In recent years, human trafficking has been identified as a form of modern
slavery, a threat to human security, and one of the greatest human rights challenges of our time. According to US government estimates, 600,000 to 800,000 persons are trafficked across international borders annually (GAO, 2006). The demand for these victims to be trafficked stems from a variety of reasons including, but not limited to: forced labor, domestic servitude, prostitution, organ removal, and war (UNODC Trafficking in Persons). While there have been many forums of discussion regarding the issue of human trafficking, there has been little discussion on the market forces driving this phenomenon. Throughout the course of this paper, I will look to fill this gap so that the international community can have better recognition of the underlying economic variables that drive human trafficking.
In recent years, human trafficking has been identified as a form of modern
slavery, a threat to human security, and one of the greatest human rights challenges of our time. According to US government estimates, 600,000 to 800,000 persons are trafficked across international borders annually (GAO, 2006). The demand for these victims to be trafficked stems from a variety of reasons including, but not limited to: forced labor, domestic servitude, prostitution, organ removal, and war (UNODC Trafficking in Persons). While there have been many forums of discussion regarding the issue of human trafficking, there has been little discussion on the market forces driving this phenomenon. Throughout the course of this paper, I will look to fill this gap so that the international community can have better recognition of the underlying economic variables that drive human trafficking.
Original Title
Defining the Market for Human Trafficking: Principles of Supply and Demand
In recent years, human trafficking has been identified as a form of modern
slavery, a threat to human security, and one of the greatest human rights challenges of our time. According to US government estimates, 600,000 to 800,000 persons are trafficked across international borders annually (GAO, 2006). The demand for these victims to be trafficked stems from a variety of reasons including, but not limited to: forced labor, domestic servitude, prostitution, organ removal, and war (UNODC Trafficking in Persons). While there have been many forums of discussion regarding the issue of human trafficking, there has been little discussion on the market forces driving this phenomenon. Throughout the course of this paper, I will look to fill this gap so that the international community can have better recognition of the underlying economic variables that drive human trafficking.
In recent years, human trafficking has been identified as a form of modern
slavery, a threat to human security, and one of the greatest human rights challenges of our time. According to US government estimates, 600,000 to 800,000 persons are trafficked across international borders annually (GAO, 2006). The demand for these victims to be trafficked stems from a variety of reasons including, but not limited to: forced labor, domestic servitude, prostitution, organ removal, and war (UNODC Trafficking in Persons). While there have been many forums of discussion regarding the issue of human trafficking, there has been little discussion on the market forces driving this phenomenon. Throughout the course of this paper, I will look to fill this gap so that the international community can have better recognition of the underlying economic variables that drive human trafficking.
Cody Moreland IA Capstone Professor Friman 4-25-14
" INTRODUCTION In recent years, human trafficking has been identified as a form of modern slavery, a threat to human security, and one of the greatest human rights challenges of our time. According to US government estimates, 600,000 to 800,000 persons are trafficked across international borders annually (GAO, 2006). The demand for these victims to be trafficked stems from a variety of reasons including, but not limited to: forced labor, domestic servitude, prostitution, organ removal, and war (UNODC Trafficking in Persons). While there have been many forums of discussion regarding the issue of human trafficking, there has been little discussion on the market forces driving this phenomenon. Throughout the course of this paper, I will look to fill this gap so that the international community can have better recognition of the underlying economic variables that drive human trafficking. Recently, human trafficking has become a popular topic of international discussion. As a result many global initiatives calling for cooperation and collective action in terms of addressing supply and demand related issues have been created. The 2000 UN Protocol for Trafficking in Persons Article 9, section 5 calls for state parties: To adopt or strengthen legislative or other measures, such as educational, social or cultural measures, including through bilateral and multilateral cooperation, to discourage the demand that fosters all forms of exploitation of persons, especially women and children, that leads to trafficking. The Report shows that in the past few years the number of Member States seriously implementing the Protocol has more than doubled (from 54 to 125 out of the 155 States covered). However, there are still many countries that lack the necessary legal # instruments or political will to ratify the protocol. For the issue of human trafficking to be tackled, more governments around the world need to participate in the forum of international cooperation. The United Nations Global Initiative to Fight Human Trafficking created their founding principle around a similar view in that, human trafficking is a crime of such magnitude and atrocity that it cannot be dealt with successfully by any government alone (UN.GIFT 2014). Going forward, a multi-lateral strategy encompassing transparent evidence and statistics from countries all over the world will lead to a more effective response. The scope of this paper will focus primarily on the economics behind transnational sex and labor trafficking, as this has become an important issue for countries all around the world. In this paper, I refer to those who victimize others in order to make a profit, as human traffickers. In contrast, I refer to those who are exploited for labor or sex, as victims. Throughout the paper, I will illustrate the relationship between the two economic agents through the principles of supply and demand. Over the course of the next decade, crime experts expect human trafficking to surpass drug and arms trafficking in the areas of occurrence, cost to human wellbeing, and profitability to criminals (Schauer and Wheaton, 2006: 164165). Existing trafficking organizations in the drug and arms trade may look to diversify their operations into human trafficking, as there is currently a market opportunity for high profits and low risk. In order to gain a better understanding of this upward trend of trafficking activities, governments of the world must go beyond the supply and demand factors and analyze other market forces that drive human trafficking. $ There are many social and economic ramifications felt by the victims of human trafficking around the world. Kevin Bales estimates that there are 27 million people trapped in modern day slavery across the world (Bales 2010: 3). The costs of human trafficking and modern slavery are experienced on the individual, community, national, regional, and global level (Shelley, 2010: 59). It can be seen that the capacity of the human trafficking business is now global in scope. According to a 2005 study by the International Labour Office, the global business of human trafficking is estimated to have a global worth of $32 billion (ILO 2005: 5). According to the report, trafficking in industrialized states accounts for $15.5 billion. Additionally, Asia accounts for $9.7 billion. It is clear that profit is the ulterior motive driving these human trafficking operations. The large amounts of profit traffickers currently enjoy stem from a high level of demand in the world economy. In response to the demand, traffickers are making efforts to increase the supply of trafficked victims in their network. Furthermore, the motive behind this issue is purely an economic one. As people become vulnerable to exploitation, and businesses continually seek to lower the cost of labor, trafficking human beings generates profit and a market for human trafficking is created. Additionally, traffickers currently exploit not only victims, but also the marketplace, largely due to high profitability, relatively low risk, and market arbitrage. The low risk stems from the lack of political will to enforce trafficking laws and implement domestic legislation, which as a result, allows modern day slavery to continue on an upward trend. The lack of political will can be illustrated through the small number of convictions for trafficking in persons. Notably, of the 132 countries covered in the 2012 UNODC Global Report on Trafficking in Persons, 16% did not record a single % conviction between 2007 and 2010. Ultimately, to solve this problem, it is essential to increase government enforcement and participation in preventing human trafficking. Additionally, the international community at larges needs to address supply and demand driven factors, as well as alter the overall market incentives of high-profit margins and low-risk factors that traffickers currently exploit. THE MARKET Viewing human trafficking from a business perspective can be somewhat shocking. This perspective requires that we consider the relationship of supply and demand of human beings to the driving force of profit. First, human trafficking is fueled by a demand for cheap labor, commercial sex, and a higher standard of living. Secondly, in order to supply this demand, human traffickers look to exploit vulnerable people and traffic them for both labor and commercial sex. In this market, vulnerable individuals (the commodity) are traded globally between traffickers (the sellers) and employers (the buyers). From an economics perspective, the business of human trafficking can be seen as a monopolistically competitive industry (Schauer, Wheaton, 2010: 119) with many sellers (human traffickers) offering many buyers (employers/individuals) differentiated products (vulnerable individuals). The product differentiation (Bales. 2005: 158) can be broken down further to supply the buyers demands of price and preferences, such as children for labor, specific traits of a female (hair color/nationality), or even the degree of vulnerability. Despite the large number of suppliers in the market, product differentiation allows monopolistically competitive sellers to have control over the price of their products on the global market (Schauer, Wheaton, 2010: 118). & In this monopolistically competitive market, human traffickers act as intermediaries by connecting the supply of labour in source areas with the demand for labour in destination areas. Traffickers are able to choose from a surplus of individuals in source markets where there are high rates of vulnerability. Generally, this vulnerability is due to lack of employment opportunities, corruption, and poverty, among other issues around the globe (Aronowitz 2009). Traffickers feed off the low costs these vulnerable members of the global population provide by selling them for high profit margins. Traffickers are able sell there product for excessive prices due to the high demand for their services in markets such as the U.S. and Europe. In the book titled, The Economics of Human Trafficking, Schauer and Wheaton refer to this phenomenon as arbitrage, or the ability to take advantage of an imbalance between two markets (Schauer and Wheaton 2010: 165). This market arbitrage allows traffickers to have high rates of profitability because the cost of labor does not trade at the same price on all markets. Furthermore, traffickers are now exploiting the international trade system set up through the Washington Consensus. With trade liberalization occurring worldwide, borders are more accessible, goods move more quickly and efficiently, and transportation costs have been reduced. As globalization has made the world more interconnected, traffickers are now able to recruit, exploit, and transport their victims with relative ease. Additionally, corruption in politicians and law enforcement officers contribute to both the lack of accurate information on human trafficking and the ease with which traffickers transport and exploit victims. In countries such as Thailand, the profits generated from trafficking help fund political parties and campaigns in order for organizations to continue their operations (Shelley, 2010: 59). Furthermore, in cases ' when governments do crack down on certain areas known for trafficking, the traffickers adapt tactics to evade detection and operate in zones of impunity (Trafficking in Persons Report 2013: 8). Going forward governments need to reduce corruption and improve recognition of zones where traffickers currently exploit vulnerable individuals. LABOR TRAFFICKING Supply Factors Traffickers look to recruit victims by using a wide variety of exploitative tactics. The recruitment of individuals for the purpose of labor or sex is much easier during times of economic crises, natural disasters, and conflict when there is a ready supply of vulnerable individuals. During these times of crisis, the supply is increased, costs for traffickers are lower, and as a result, profits are higher. In Africa, for example, large numbers of individuals seeking new job opportunities are trafficked by boats from Africa to the Canary Islands. According to UNODC, this trafficking business operating from Mauritania, Gambia, Senegal, and Morocco to Europe nets the trafficking organizations 415 million dollars annually (Brothers, 2007). Human traffickers promise opportunities to individuals who lack the financial means necessary to provide for themselves and their families. The prospect of jobs and financial opportunity in places like the United States or Europe is generally very hard for these impoverished individuals to turn down, mainly because they lack the knowledge to understand the exploitative tactics of traffickers. Furthermore, traffickers feed off depressed areas by recruiting these people into forced or bonded labor. Bonded labor, also known as debt bondage, is a form of modern slavery and can be defined as an arrangement whereby a person is forced to pay off a loan with direct labor in place of currency, over an agreed or obscure period of time ( (Princeton, cit. 17). Many individuals become victims of debt bondage when traffickers exploit the initial agreed upon term of employment. In most cases, the trafficked individual will only make enough money to pay for basic survival necessities such as housing and food. In this sense, they have no disposable income to rid themselves from the debt they incurred to the buyer. Furthermore, in many cases, the trafcked individual does not have the right to decide whether to work, how many hours to work, or what kind of work to do (Bales, 1999: 9). Examples of debt bondage are widespread and can even extend to different generations. This is usually due the failure to pay back debts accumulated and highly inflated rates of interest on loans (Zakhari, 2005: 141). For example, in India 81% of individuals trapped in bonded labour took out a loan from a landlord, as they did not have enough money to provide for basic necessities (Anti-Slavery.org - cit. 18). Furthermore, a forced labour expert, Siddharth Kara, estimates in his book, Bonded Labor: Tackling the System of Slavery in South Asia that there are, approximately 18 to 25 million bonded laborers in the world, with roughly 84-88 percent of whom are in South Asia (Kara, 2012: 3). This high amount of bonded laborers account for more than half of the worlds slave population (Kara, 2012: 3). Demand Factors The high demand for labor trafficking stems from a variety of factors including, low costs, ease of manipulation, and vulnerability. As businesses look to make profits they cut costs in labor by exploiting individuals who are vulnerable and easy to control (See Figure 1, supply/demand for labor). In her book, Slavery and Gender, Beth Herzfield argues that the individuals that are generally trafficked for labor are children ) because they are easier to control, cheaper, and less likely to demand better working conditions (Herzfeld, 2002: 52). These children laborers provide labor flexibility and increases in productivity for businesses by working long hours under all types of conditions. Children have been trafficked for the use of labor in a wide variety of jobs including, but not limited to: fighting for war lords in Africa, prostitution in United States, and even for production and trafficking of drugs as seen in South America. These forms of employment are easily brought to the public attention through the use of information politics by trans advocacy networks. However, the problem is that information from the largest form of girls employment, domestic servitude (Herzfeld 53), is less globally diffused. This can be seen as a result of social norms where people fail to care or understand the background of these servants and human trafficking in general. Other parts of the world have different dynamics when it comes to the demand of human trafficking. Herzfeld uses the example of the demand for children to be used as camel jockeys in the Middle East. In her example, she illustrates how young boys are trafficked from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and parts of Africa to be camel jockeys because they are small, light, and not paid (Herzfeld 53). While this may seem like a minor form in comparison to other trafficked laborers, nevertheless there are cases of severe injuries and even death. Other areas of the world, like Africa, and specifically Uganda, children are demanded by warlords to fight (boys) or act as sex slaves for soldiers (girls). All of these forms of work and enslavement endanger the health, safety, and future prospects of children throughout the world. Therefore, if human trafficking for labor *+ purposes is to be reduced, it is necessary to increase awareness, improve wages and quality of life, and lastly, build government capacity to make a difference. SEX TRAFFICKING Demand Factors Currently, U.S. federal law defines sex trafficking as the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for the purpose of a commercial sex act (TIP Report 2013). According to the report, the most common form of human trafficking is sexual exploitation at a near 80% of all trafficked victims. The US Department of State holds the stance that there is a significant nexus between prostitution and human trafficking. They argue that, prostitution is inherently harmful and dehumanizing and fuels the demand for trafficking (Trafficking in Persons National Security Presidential Directive, 2003). In terms of economics, prostitution can be seen as the commodification of the human body and of human sexuality. The phenomenon of sex trafficking is felt in all regions throughout the globe. The victims of sexual exploitation are predominantly women and young girls as they are most vulnerable and easiest to control. In 2013 the UNODC reported that there were an estimated 4.5 million victims of sex slavery in the world at any given time, estimating that 98% of these victims are women and girls (UNODC Report on TIP 2013). In order to help this victims escape the chains of slavery the world needs to focus on the root cause, the recognition that without mens demand for and use of females for sexual exploitation, the global prostitution industry would not be able flourish and expand. (Ekberg 2004: 1189). In 2013, the TIP Report stated definitively that, If there were no demand for commercial sex, sex trafficking would not exist in the form it does ** today. This reality underscores the need for continued strong efforts to enact policies and promote cultural norms that disallow paying for sex. (2013 TIP Report). Therefore, the focus needs to shift to governments abolishing prostitution and thus the demand for human trafficking. Because legal prostitution fuels human trafficking, nations that maintain a legal model of prostitution are not making serious and sustained efforts to reduce demand for commercial sex, but instead are making serious and sustained efforts to increase that demand. Supply Factors In the European Union, most trafficking is for the purpose of sexual exploitation in prostitution. Victims are usually trafficked into brothels or strip clubs or even to pimps which fuels the demand of trafficked individuals by concealing the intentions of sex trade traffickers. Since the fall of communism in Europe, many individuals have been exploited due to their vulnerability. High levels of unemployment and financially depressed populations as a result of political and economic instability provide a wide pool of victims to choose from. Traffickers recruit these vulnerable individuals into the sex trade by advertising through websites or job fairs that look like legitimate employment opportunities including modeling or waitressing. Furthermore, the ability to transport these individuals in the European Union is very easy for traffickers due to laws to promote labor mobility. In Europe over half of the trafficked victims come from the Balkans (32%) and the former Soviet Union (19%), with 13% originating in South America, 7% in Central Europe, 5% in Africa, and 3% in East Asia (UNODC: Trafficking in Persons to Europe for Sexual Exploitation, 2010). It can be seen that in *" most cases victims are trafficked across international borders but often remain intra- regional. In South Asia traffickers exploit vulnerable individuals who lack the financial means to support themselves by promising them high paying jobs as domestic servants in big cities. These people generally end up into prostitution through the use of coercion or drug abuse by traffickers. The most common sex trafficking route in Asia according to Sawnee Hunt, in his book Deconstructing Demand: The Driving Force of Sex Trafficking, is from Nepal, Myanmar, and Bangladesh across the Indian border via land routes (Hunt 2013: 2). These trafficked victims generally wind up as prostitutes in Mumbai brothels or Karachi sums before being trafficked to the Gulf States (Hunt 2013: 2). It can be seen that sex trafficking has become global and can extend beyond just intra- regional locations. Sex trafficking is also widespread throughout the United States. According to the National Report on Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking, as many as 100,000 to 300,000 children are bought for sex in America every year (2009). The U.S. Department of Justice reports that more than 80% of cases they have investigated have resulted in identifying U.S. citizens as the victims rather then foreigner immigrants (Estes, Weiner, 2002). The domestic problem in the United States has gone largely unnoticed. Furthermore, through the use of websites such as backpage.com or Craigslist, traffickers have innovated new methods for sales, advertising, and protection. In monitoring these sites, law enforcement officials have observed that as the date of major sporting event nears, ads for escorts and commercial sex services increase on a weekly basis (Hunt 2013: 2). The increase in demand is usually seen surrounding events such as *# the Superbowl, World Series, PGA events, NHL playoffs, horse races and many other sporting events (Report on Human Trafficking and Major Sporting Events, cit.23). The Superbowl, for example, has been described by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbot as, the single-largest human trafficking incident in the United States (Hunt 2013: 3). To supply the increasing demand that accompanies sporting events like the Superbowl, traffickers bring in thousands of women to be prostituted. Law enforcement agencies have taken note, and have increased enforcement around these events. For example, during the 2014 Superbowl, twenty-six law enforcement agencies worked together in fifteen different states, by conducting operations on the street, in hotels, in brothels, via the Internet and other channels. As a result of the operations, 1832 potential sex buyers were arrested and were charged with more than $1 million in possible fines (demandaboliton.org). While this was a big improvement in terms of enforcement, there is still need for more punishment to raise the risks associated with participating in the sex trade. PREVENTION: REDUCING SUPPLY & DEMAND The endless supply of trafficking victims will never be reduced unless the demand for trafficking is combatted. The general consensus in regard to exploitative sex demand issues is that the sex sector needs to be eliminated and demand needs to be reduced in sectors where trafficking occurs. Reducing demand for commercial sex by criminalizing the purchase of sexual services reduces the market for sex and thereby reduces trafficking in persons for sexual exploitation. Furthermore, the demand for exploitative labor needs to be reduced by increasing awareness around the world, improving wages and quality of life, and lastly, building *$ government capacity to deal with human trafficking issues. Other tactics to reduce demand can be used as well. For instance, creating legal migration channels for workers so they do not have to use other measures to find job prospects. Secondly, improving working conditions and labor laws will improve quality of life and reduce the likelihood of exploitation in the workplace. In conclusion, I believe that by not participating in prostitution or cheap labor practices, the demand for trafficked individuals will decrease. By reducing demand, it will lower the price in which traffickers can sell their product on global markets and as a result the number one motive for traffickers, profit, will be reduced. Supply side considerations also need to be taken into account when looking to prevent human trafficking. The worlds supply of vulnerable individuals need the prospect of improving their quality of life through employment. Governments need to be proactive in improving income inequality, employment levels, and poverty reduction to meet this demand. Poverty levels are extremely high and need to be improved around the world in order to reduce the number of vulnerable individuals. Government The international community at large is beginning to realize the economic and social effects of human trafficking. According to the 2009 UNODC Global Report on Trafficking Persons, the number of countries having anti-trafficking legislation more than doubled between 2003 and 2008. The first step in reducing human trafficking around the world is to realize that trafficking not only exists but that it also has a negative impact towards society as a whole. This step has been taken, however, now there is a need to take a step further and address other market factors. Factors such as poverty levels and *% immigration policies that have a direct impact on the supply and demand of trafficked individuals need to be accounted for. In this sense, governments can reduce the mobility of individuals that globalization has created by further securing borders. Additionally, market dynamics centered on trafficking organizations need to be analyzed including, but not limited to: business strategies, advertising, profit margins and goals, use of violence and corruption, and the educational level of traffickers (Shelley, 2004: 114). By having a better understanding of the market factors that influence human traffickers decision making process, the international community and law enforcement agencies can put there resources to the highest valued use. In terms of enforcement, by cracking down on large criminal organizations as well as small-scale operations, the risk for profit will be increased and the supply of their operations will decrease. To date, the international community has been very unsuccessful in reducing human trafficking. However, there have been some improvements noticed around the world. In 1999, Sweden implemented the Sex Purchase Act to address the demand of human trafficking. The Swedish law made buying sex a criminal offense; however selling it still remained legal. In this sense, pimps and buyers were targeted rather than the women providing the service of sex. By 2003, the new law began paying off. During this year, Gunilla Ekberg notes in her book, Violence Against Women, that there was a 300% increase in arrests due to what she referred to as a deeper comprehension of conditions that make women vulnerable to being trafficked and better investigation methods (Ekberg 2004: 1196). This improvement correlates to a major problem with the enforcement of human trafficking around the world. Law enforcement officials generally lack the specialized knowledge needed, such as the ability to distinguish trafficking from *& migrant smuggling. Going forward, governments need to take notice of Swedens proactive measures by educating law enforcement officials in regards to trafficking indicators. Since Sweden began education officials and prioritizing demand reductions, the results have been shocking. Street prostitution has declined by 65% and purchasers of sex have decreased by over 80% in a span of ten years (Atamenenko 2013). This reduction in demand can be seen as a result of higher risk due to punishment. As Ekberg notes, when the buyers risk punishment, the number of men who buy prostituted persons decreases, and the local prostitution markets become less lucrative (Ekberg 2004: 1187). Other countries in Europe, specifically Iceland and Norway, have taken notice and implemented similar legislation to reduced demand side dynamics. Now this phenomenon needs to be globally diffused so that the demand for human trafficking can be reduced around the world. Additionally, increasing international cooperation through the use of NGOs and international organizations will diffuse the norm reducing demand for human trafficking. Moreover, by sharing information from the man on the spot, to use Hayeks term, the decision making entities among state and non state actors will be able to make informed and well calculated decisions when creating and implementing preventative human trafficking policies. Individuals within trans advocacy networks can work with these government organizations and NGOs to take action to reduce the demand of human trafficking. Individual norm entrepreneurs can bring attention to the issue of human trafficking through what Finnemore and Sikkink refer to as strategic social construction *' (Finnemore and Sikkink, 1998). This strategy frames the issue, in this case human trafficking, to be more efficiently diffused around the world. Furthermore, as Dong Wook Kim argues in INGOs and the Global Diffusion of National Human Rights Institutions, these norm entrepreneurs can use Transnational Advocacy Networks (TANs), NGOs, and IOs for political voice opportunities and global diffusion (Kim, 2013: 505). Using Kims framework, the issue of human trafficking can be tackled if these groups can work together to mobilize shame internationally. By mobilizing shame, states will fear the backlash from not adopting trafficking policies, and as a result will take action to improve their situation. An example of an NGO that looks to prevent human trafficking is Anti-Slavery International. This NGO works at the local, national, and international levels to eliminate slavery around the world. They are able to mobilize shame internationally, to use Kims term, by transmitting information to the international community about governments that do not enforce existing human trafficking legislation. Furthermore, through the use of these TANs and NGOs human trafficking prevention laws will become internationalized and universally accepted (Finnemore and Sikkink, 1998: 898). The term Transnational Advocacy Networks (TANs) came from Keck and Sikkink's book, Activists Beyond Borders. They argue that, TANs are organized to promote causes, principled ideas, and norms, and they often involve individuals advocating policy changes that cannot be easily linked to a rationalist understanding of their interests (Keck and Sikkink 1998: 8). These TANs can use information, symbolic, leverage, and accountability politics to persuade powerful governments to take action against human trafficking. *( CONCLUSION Ultimately, from my analysis on the supply and demand of human trafficking I saw that the supply of vulnerable individuals is big factor when looking at the amount of trafficked individuals. However, I believe that the demand for cheap labor and sexual services is what ultimately influences the amount of trafficked individuals. I argue that reducing demand is the best way for governments to take action against human traffickers. However, unless the degree of poverty and quality of life is improved around the world, there will always be a surplus of vulnerable individuals that traffickers and buyers can exploit. While accepting the need to address demand, it is important to acknowledge the limits of a term that is not properly defined, is under-researched and is still subject to debate and confusion. The commodification of workers through demand-based discourses ignores the fact that trafficked persons, migrants and workers are people who are trying to access labor and migration opportunities for themselves and their families, and who often try to resist or escape exploitative situations. In conclusion, no matter how many victims are rescued at the end of the day, modern slavery will continue if the supply, demand, and profit remain unchanged. In order for this to change, society must fundamentally alter the equation and make the business of human trafficking the opposite of what it is today: a high-risk, low profit crime.
*)
Source: Schauer & Wheaton, 2010: 120
"+ RESOURCES
1. Secretary of State John Kerry. Remarks at the 2013 Trafficking in Persons Report Release. Benjamin Franklin Room, Washington, D.C. 19 June 2013. Address.
2. Ekberg, Gunilla. "The Swedish Law that Prohibits the Purchase of Sexual Services." Violence Against Women. 10th ed. Vol. 10. N.p.: n.p., 2004. 1187-211. Print
3. Atamanenko, Alex. Member of Parliament. "The Nordic Law: The Swedish Experience." New Democratic Party of Canada, 23 Oct. 2013. Web. 24 Apr. 2014.
4. Hunt, Swanee. "Deconstructing Demand: The Driving Force of Sex Trafficking." The Brown Journal of World Affairs 19.11 (2013): n. pag. JSTOR. Web. 24 Apr. 2014.
5. National Report on Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking: Americas Prostituted Children, Shared Hope International, 2009.
6. Richard J. Estes and Neil Alan Weiner. The Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. University of Pennsylvania, 2002.
7. Herzfeld, Beth. "Slavery and Gender: Women's Double Exploitation." Gender & Development 10.1 (2002): 50-55. Print.
8. Wheaton, Schauer, and Galli. "Economics of Human Trafficking." International Migration 48 (2010): n. pag. www.amherst.edu. Web. 25 Feb. 2014.
9. Alexis A. Aronowitz, Human Trafficking, Human Misery: The Global Trade in Human Beings (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2009), 11-12
10. "UN.GIFT." Global Initiative to Fight Human Trafficking. United Nations, n.d. Web. 23 Feb. 2014
11. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. "International Norm Dynamics and Political Change." International Organization 52.4 (1998): 887-917. Print.
12. "Human Trafficking: Better Data, Strategy, and Reporting Needed to Enhance U.S. Anti-trafficking Efforts Abroad." Http://www.gao.gov. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Aug. 2006. Web. 22 Feb. 2014.
13. Gergana Danailova-Trainor & Patrick Belser. Globalization and the Illicit Market for Human Trafficking: An Empirical Analysis of Supply and Demand. Geneva, International Labour Office, 2006
"* 14. "Human Trafficking: A Horrible Business." The Economist. The Economist Newspaper, 14 June 2008. Web. 25 Feb. 2014.
15. United States. Department of State. Trafficking in Persons Report 2013. N.p.: US Government, 2013. Print.
16. "Trafficking in Persons National Security Presidential Directive." The White House Archives. Office of the Press Secretary, 25 Feb. 2003. Web. 19 Apr. 2014.
19. U.N. Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime. UN Trafficking in Persons Protocol. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2004. UNODC.ORG. Web. 25 Apr. 2014.
20. Shelley, Louise I. Human Trafficking: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010. Print.
21. Kara, Siddharth. Bonded Labor: Tackling the System of Slavery in South Asia. New York: Columbia UP, 2012. Print.
22. Brothers, Caroline. "Criminal Gangs Profit from Smuggling of Illegal Immigrants from Africa into Europe." New York Times. N.p., 20 Mar. 2007. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.
23. "Human Trafficking and Major Sporting Events." U.S. Catholic Sisters Against Human Trafficking, n.d. Web. 25 Apr. 2014. <http://www.unanima- international.org/wp-content/uploads/11_13HTMajorSporting-Events- FINAL.pdf>.
24. Bales, Kevin. The Slave next Door: Human Trafficking and Slavery in America Today. Berkeley, CA: U of California, 2010. Print.
25. "Demand Abolition National Day of Johns Arrests." Demand Abolition RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Apr. 2014. <http://www.demandabolition.org/national-day-of- johns-arrests/>.
26. Zakhari, B Legal cases prosecuted under the Victims of Trafcking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, 2005. in S. Stoecker and L. Shelley, Human Trafc and Transnational Crime: Eurasian and American Perspectives.
Manila Prince Hotel, Petitioner, vs. Government Service Insurance System, Manila Hotel Corporation, Committee On Privatization and Office of The Government Corporate Counsel, Respondents