Bio N MWCNT
Bio N MWCNT
Bio N MWCNT
Nanotubes
Linacre College
Trinity Term 2006
Abstract
Applications such as biosensors are important for medical advances in the detection of molecules
such as antibodies, and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) hold the promise to improve detection to the single
(or very few) molecular level. However, un-doped CNT biosensor devices can have disadvantages
of low conductivity and high contact resistance. As a result of this work, a novel biosensor based on
nitrogen-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNx MWNTs) has been developed, using a design
which minimizes these problems.
CNTs are long, thin cylinders of carbon that have been the subject of much research since
their discovery in 1991. Their small diameter, high aspect ratio and strong carbon-carbon bonds,
give CNTs unique physical and electronic properties, all of which may be altered by nitrogendoping This thesis reports measurement of the electrical and thermal conductance of CNx MWNTs
using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). The CNx MWNTs were found to exhibit high conductance
consistent with theoretical predictions. Thermal conductance measurements were taken in vacuum
and the CNx MWNTs were found to have reduced thermal conductance compared to un-doped
MWNTs. The effect of acid oxidation on these properties was also investigated.
The potential of CNx MWNTs for bioapplications was investigated by functionalisation of the
tubes with the metalloproteins ferritin, ferredoxin, azurin and cytochrome c. The effect on the
biomolecules was monitored using spectroscopy and antibody binding assays, and proteins were
found to retain their biologically relevant conformation. These proteins were then sensed using a
biosensing device based on CNx MWNTs.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the following people:
Prof John Ryan for introducing me to a very interesting and ever expanding area of science,
and for giving me the opportunity to make a contribution to it.
Dr Sonia Antoranz Contera for her patient supervision and AFM training.
Dr Maurits de Planque for watching over my various pieces of biochemistry.
Dr Julia Davies for supervising my research at NPL during January, July and August 2006.
Dr Lizzie Brown for the use of her AFM conductance set-up at NPL and for her help with the
measurements. Also Dr Ling Hao for helpful discussions.
Dr Kislon Votchovsky for building the Keithley measurement system without which none of
my biosensor measurements would have been possible.
Contents
1
Introduction
1.1
Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
1.1.5
Biosensor Device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2.1
Posters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2.2
Oral Presentations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2.3
Publications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thesis Outline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2
1.3
2
Carbon Nanotubes
2.1
Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2
Nitrogen-doping of CNTs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.1
Doping Configurations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.2
10
2.2.3
Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11
Synthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11
2.3.1
12
Growth Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13
2.4.1
13
2.4.2
Growth Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14
2.4.3
14
Electronic Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15
2.5.1
SWNTs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15
2.5.2
Chirality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
Thermal Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 Experimental Techniques
3.1
18
25
25
3.1.1
Tip-sample interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25
3.1.2
29
3.1.3
Modes of Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30
3.1.4
Optical Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30
3.1.5
Feedback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30
UV-vis Spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
32
3.2.1
33
3.3
34
3.4
Lyophilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35
3.2
4.2
4.3
4.4
37
4.1.1
Quantized Conductance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37
4.1.2
SWNTs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38
4.1.3
MWNTs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38
40
4.2.1
Density of States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
40
4.2.2
Previous Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41
Experimental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
42
4.3.1
AFM Set-up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
42
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
44
4.4.1
Annealing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
44
4.4.2
Conductance Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
44
4.4.3
46
4.4.4
Electrical Breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
5.2
5.3
37
52
Previous Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
52
5.1.1
52
5.1.2
53
5.1.3
53
53
5.2.1
53
Experimental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
54
5.4
5.5
5.3.1
55
5.3.2
Spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
55
5.3.3
Apo proteins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
56
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
57
5.4.1
Ferredoxin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
57
5.4.2
Ferritin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
59
5.4.3
Azurin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
61
5.4.4
Cytochrome c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
65
Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
69
5.5.1
Protein Binding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
69
5.5.2
71
5.5.3
71
5.5.4
Future Bioapplications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
72
78
6.1
Previous Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
78
6.2
Experimental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
78
6.3
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
79
6.4
Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
81
83
7.1
Previous Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
83
7.1.1
Solubility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
83
Experimental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
84
7.2.1
Acid Oxdiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
84
7.2.2
Lyophilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
85
7.2.3
85
7.2.4
Acid-base titrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
85
7.2.5
86
7.2.6
87
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
88
7.3.1
Length Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
88
7.3.2
Diameter Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
88
7.3.3
Acid-base Titrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
88
7.3.4
Electrical Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
90
7.3.5
Thermal Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
92
Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
94
7.4.1
94
7.2
7.3
7.4
Solubility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.4.2
Oxidation Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
94
7.4.3
Electrical Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
96
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.1.2
8.1.3
Experimental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
8.2.1
8.2.2
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
8.3.1
8.3.2
8.3.3
Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
8.4.1
9.2
101
117
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
9.1.1
9.1.2
9.1.3
9.1.4
9.1.5
9.2.2
9.2.3
9.2.4
9.2.5
9.2.6
10 Appendix
124
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Motivation
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are unusual objects with interesting electrical and physical properties,
which make them valuable components for devices such as field-effect transistors, 1 gas sensors, 2
and interconnects 3 in nano-circuits.
properties 6 through n-doping. Whilst extensive measurements of the electrical transport properties
of un-doped CNTs have been made, 714 the electrical transport properties of nitrogen-doped CNTs
have been subject to very little investigation. 1517 Furthermore, the results of these investigations
suggest that nitrogen-doped CNTs exhibit very poor electrical transport, despite theoretical predictions to the contrary. 18 It is this apparent contradiction that motivated the first aim of this work,
which was to study the electrical transport properties of individual nitrogen-doped CNTs. Electrical
transport measurements were carried out at the National Physical Laboratory.
here refers to electron doping and not nitrogen doping. Throughout this thesis doping with nitrogen will be written
as N or nitrogen.
Introduction
CNTs for bioapplications. In addition to their interesting electrical transport properties, the structure of nitrogen-doped CNTs is rich in hydrophilic (N) defects. Similar nitrogen groups anchored
to gold substrates, have been shown to facilitate electron transfer to and from metalloproteins. 22,23
Nitrogen-doped CNTs have also recently been found to have reduced toxicity compared to un-doped
CNTs. 24 Despite these advantages, there is only one report of biofunctionalisation of nitrogendoped CNTs in the literature. 25 In the second part of this project the suitability of nitrogen-doped
CNTs for bioapplications was investigated, by functionalisation with the soluble metalloproteins
azurin, cytochrome c, ferritin and ferredoxin.
Introduction
1.2.1 Posters
Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as biosensors by Hilary Burch, Characterization Seminar, Department of Materials University of Oxford on 17th October 2005.
Conference Proceedings
1.2.3 Publications
Acid cutting of CNx multiwalled nanotubes and modified electrical conductance by Hilary J.
Burch, Sonia Antoranz Contera, Elisabetta Brown, Julia A. Davies, Nashville C. Toledo, Ling
Hao, Nicole Grobert and J. F. Ryan submitted to J. Phys. Chem. C. (2007).
3
Introduction
Sensing of metalloproteins with a CNx multiwalled nanotube device by Hilary J. Burch, Sonia
Antoranz Contera, Kislon Votchovsky, Lydia M. Harriss, Nicole Grobert and J. F. Ryan
submitted to Appl. Phys. Lett. (2007).
Chapter 2 is an introduction to the physical and electronic properties of CNTs. The theoretical
origins of measured electrical transport properties such as quantized electrical conductance
are also given.
Chapter 3 provides a description of the experimental techniques used in this work. It includes
a section on the principles of Atomic Force Microscopy, and the theoretical principles of the
spectroscopic techniques used to study the metalloproteins.
Chapter 4 contains measurements of the electrical conductance and breakdown of nitrogendoped CNTs.
Chapter 7 investigates the effect of acid treatment on nitrogen-doped CNTs in particular with
respect to some of the properties measured in earlier chapters.
Chapter 8 describes the development of a novel biosensor which responds to the binding of
metalloproteins, and the further specific binding of antibodies.
Chapter 9 concludes the thesis and incorporates a discussion of possible future experiments
to improve and consolidate this work.
Introduction
References
[1] A. Javey, J. Guo, Q. Wang, M. Lundstrom, and H. Dai. Ballistic carbon nanotube field-effect
transistors. Nature, 424:654657, 2003.
[2] J. Kong, N. R. Franklin, C. Zhou, M. G. Chapline, S. Peng, K. Cho, and H. Dai. Nanotube
molecular wires as channels sensors. Science, 287:622625, 2000.
[3] S. J. Tans, M. H. Devoret, H. Dai, A. Thess, R. E. Smalley, L. J. Geerligs, and C. Dekker.
Individual single-walled carbon nanotubes as quantum wires. Nature, 386:474477, 1997.
[4] J. M. Wildoer, L. C. Venema, A. G. Rinzler, R. E. Smalley, and C. Dekker. Electronic strucure
and electronic of atomically resolved carbon nanotubes. Nature, 391:5961, 1998.
[5] R. Krupke, F. Hennrich, H. von Lohneysen, and M. M. Kappes. Separation of metallic from
semiconducting single-walled nanotubes. Science, 301:344347, 2003.
[6] R. Czerw, M. Terrones, J.-C. Charlier, X. Blase, B. Foley, R. Kamalakaran, N. Grobert, H. Terrones, P. M. Ajayan, W. Blau, D. Tekleab, M. Ruhle, and D. L. Carroll. Identification of
electron donor states in N-doped carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett., 1(9):457460, 2001.
[7] S. Frank, P. Poncharal, Z. L. Wang, and W. A. de Heer. Carbon nanotube quantum resistors.
Science, 280:17441746, 1998.
[8] P. Poncharal, C. Berger, Y. Yi, L. Wang, and W. A. de Heer. Room temperature ballistic
conduction in carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. B., 106:1210412118, 2002.
[9] C. Berger, Y. Yi, J. Gezo, P. Poncharal, and W. A. de Heer. Contacts, non-linear transport
effects and failure in multi-walled carbon nanotubes. New J. Phys., 5:158.1, 2003.
[10] H. Dai, E. W. Wong, and C. M. Lieber. Probing electrical transport in nanomaterials: conductivity of individual carbon nanotubes. Science, 272:523526, 1996.
[11] T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. Hiura, J. W. Bennett, H. F. Ghaemi, and T. Thio. Electrical
conductivity of individual carbon nanotubes. Nature, 382:5456, 1996.
[12] J. Kong, H. T. Soh, A. M. Cassell, C. F. Quate, and H. Dai. Synthesis of individual singlewalled carbon nanotubes on patterned silicon wafers. Nature, 395:878881, 1998.
[13] C. Zhou, J. Kong, and H. Dai. Electrical measurements of individual semiconducting singlewalled nanotubes of various diameters. Appl. Phys. Lett., 76(12):15971599, 2000.
[14] A. Hassanien, M. Tokumoto, Y. Kumazawa, H. Kataura, Y. Maniwa, S. Suzuki, and Y. Achiba.
Atomic structure and electronic properties of single-wall carbon nanotubes probed by scanning
tunneling microscope at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett., 73(26):38393841, 1998.
[15] K. Xiao, Y. Liu, P. Hu, G. Yu, Y. Sun, and D. Zhu. n-type field-effect transistors made of an
individual nitrogen-doped multiwalled carbon nanotube. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127:86148617,
2005.
5
Introduction
[16] K. Xiao, Y. Liu, P. Huang, G. Yu, L. Fu, and D. Zhu. High performance field-effect transistors
made of a multiwall CNx /C nanotube intermolecular junction. Appl. Phys. Lett., 83(23):4824
4826, 2003.
[17] D. Golberg, P. S. Dorozhkin, Y. Bando, Z.-C. Dong, C. C. Tang, Y. Uemura, N. Grobert,
M. Reyes-Reyes, H. Terrones, and M. Terrones. Structure, transport and field-emission properties of compound nanotubes: CNx vs BNCx (x 0.1). Appl. Phys. A, 76:499507, 2003.
[18] H. J. Choi, J. Ihm, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen. Defects, quasibound states and quantum
conductance in metallic carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84(13):29172920, 2000.
[19] R. J. Chen, S. Bangsaruntip, K. A. Drouvalakis, N. Wong Shi Kam, M. Shim, Y. Li, W. Kim,
P. J. Utz, and H. Dai. Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes for highy specific
electronic biosensors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100(9):49844989, 2003.
[20] P. W. Barone, S. Baik, D. A. Heller, and M. S. Strano. Near-infrared optical sensors based on
single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature Materials, 4:8692, 2005.
[21] N. Wong Shi Kam, T. C. Jessop, P. A. Wender, and H. Dai. Nanotube molecular transporters:
Internalization of carbon nanotube-protein conjugates in to mammalian cells. J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 126:68506851, 2004.
[22] F. A. Armstrong, H. A. O. Hill, and N. J. Walton. Direct electrochemistry of redox proteins.
Acc. Chem. Res., 21:407413, 1988.
[23] M. J. Eddowes and H. A. O. Hill. Novel method for the investigation of the electrochemisty
of metalloproteins: Cytochrome c. J. C. S. Chem. Comm., pages 771772, 1977.
[24] J. C. Carrero-Sanchez, A. L. Elas, R. Mancilla, G. Arrelln, H. Terrones, J. P. Laclette, and
M. Terrones. Biocompatibility and toxicological studies of carbon nanotubes doped with nitrogen. Nano Lett., 6(8):16091616, 2006.
[25] K. Jiang, L. S. Schadler, R. W. Siegel, X. Zhang, H. Zhang, and M. Terrones. Protein immoblisation on carbon nanotubes via a two-step process of diimide activated amidation. J. Mater.
Chem., 14:3739, 2004.
[26] M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and P. C. Eklund. Science of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes. Academic Press Inc., New York, 1st edition, 1996.
[27] Z. Yao, J.-S. Wang, B. Li, and G.-R. Liu. Thermal conductance of carbon nanotubes using
molecular dynamics. Phys. Rev. B, 71:085417, 2005.
[28] J. Hone, M. Whitney, C. Piskoti, and A. Zettl. Thermal conductivity of single-walled carbon
nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B, 59(4):25142516, 1999.
[29] W. Yi, L. Lu, Z. Dian-lin, Z. W. Pan, and S. S. Xie. Linear specific heat of carbon nanotubes.
Phys. Rev. B, 59(14):90159018, 1999.
[30] E. Brown, L. Hao, J. C. Gallop, and J. C. Macfarlane. Ballistic thermal and electrical conductance measurements on individual multiwall carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett., 87:023107,
2005.
6
Introduction
Anal.
[32] G. Gruner. Carbon nanotube transistors for biosensing applications. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
384:322335, 2006.
[33] K. Bradley, M. Briman, A. Star, and G. Gruner. Charge transfer from adsorbed proteins. Nano
Lett., 4(2):253256, 2004.
[34] K. Besteman, J.-O. Lee, F. G. M. Wiertz, H. A. Heering, and C. Dekker. Enzyme-coated
carbon nanotubes as single-molecule biosensors. Nano Lett., 3(6):727730, 2003.
[35] A. Star, J.-C. P. Gabriel, K. Bradley, and G. Gruner. Electronic detection of specific protein
binding using nanotube FET devices. Nano Lett., 3(4):459463, 2003.
[36] S. Boussaad, N. J. Tao, R. Zhang, T. Hopson, and L. A. Nagahara. In situ detection of cytochrome c adsorption with single walled carbon nanotube device. Chem. Commun., pages
15021503, 2003.
Chapter 2
Carbon Nanotubes
CNTs were first identified by Oberlin and Endo 1 in 1976 and were illustrated as cylindrical fullerenes, 2
capped with a buckyball hemisphere by Smalley 3 in 1990. The first reported synthesis of CNTs was
by Iijima 4 in 1991, which started the field of research into their many interesting physical and electrical properties.
2.1 Structure
Iijimas CNTs consisted of several coaxial graphite layers wound around a common axis, with an
inter-layer separation of
Single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs) were synthesized in 1993, 5,6 and introduced the use of Co
catalysts during synthesis (see section 2.3) in addition to Fe. SWNTs can be envisaged as a single
graphene sheet wrapped into a seamless cylinder (fig. 2.1), the CNT has axial symmetry and exhibits
a spiral conformation called chirality. 7
Carbon Nanotubes
Figure 2.2: Possible bonding configurations for N in graphitic networks: (a) pyridine-like N, (b)
pyrrole-like N, (c) substitutional N, (d) nitrile -C N, (e) amine - NH2 , (f) single N pyridinic vacancy, (g) triple N pyridinic vacancy, and (h) interstitial N, from Ewels et al. 26
The first synthesis of nitrogen-doped multiwalled nanotubes (CNx MWNTs, x = 2-5%) was reported by Terrones et al. 12 in 1997, via synthesis of MWNTs in a nitrogen-rich atmosphere. Since
then, various synthetic routes and nitrogen concentrations have been reported for CNx MWNTs 1319
which have interesting electronic, 20,21 and physical 11,22 properties. The synthesis of the CNx
MWNTs used in this work was reported by Reyes-Reyes et al. 23 in 2004. More recently, CNx
SWNTs have been produced. 24,25
Carbon Nanotubes
are:
However, only the third arrangement, where a N atom is directly substituted for a C atom in
the hexagonal network, generates an electrical donor state 27 (where electrons from N are donated
into the graphitic network). In this arrangement, N uses three of its valence electrons to form 3
bonds, one electron fills the state and the fifth electron enters the state. In the case of the
pyridine-like arrangement, the lone pair (two electrons on N that not are required for bonding)
enters a non-bonding (px ) orbital and pyrrole-like N donates its remaining two electrons to a
orbital, completing the aromatic ring. As a result these two configurations are non-doping. 27 More
information on hybridization can be found in the Appendix (section 10.3).
Experimental evidence for the pyridine-like configuration can be seen in the intensity ratio of
the G to D bands in the Raman spectrum of CNx MWNTs, 28 also, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS) reveals both pyridine-like and substitutional nitrogen atoms in the hexagonal structure. 14
Nitrogen may also bond as a nitrile -C N [fig. 2.2(d)] or an amine -NH2 [fig. 2.2(e)] or exist as
N2 intercalated between the graphite layers. 23,2931
Carbon Nanotubes
Figure 2.3: (a) The bamboo-like structure of CNx MWNTs, from Jang et al. 33
2.2.3 Structure
The effect of nitrogen incorporation in the CNx MWNTs is to produce a unique corrugated hollow
nanotube structure, that is very different to the perfect structure of SWNTs. The CNx MWNTs are
also thicker than un-doped MWNTs, being 10-100 nm in diameter and up to several m in length.
The unique structure is due to the distortion and bending of the graphene layers around nitrogen
defects, which gives a bamboo-like appearence (fig. 2.3). Sections of this disordered material
(100-150 nm) are connected by straight segments of the familiar MWNT structure. 14 AFM and
Lateral FM measurements have shown that the wall of the nanotube is thicker in the straight region
than in the disordered region. This causes the characteristic surface roughness of bamboo CNTs,
which are curved because of the imperfect linkage of the bamboo-like compartments. 33
The characteristic bamboo structure can also be considered as polymerised carbon nitride nanobells 18
or nanocages, 34 where each nano-compartment is linked together to form the tube. Investigations
suggest that the overall morphology of the tubes, depends strongly on the nitrogen concentration. 13
2.3 Synthesis
There are several methods for the synthesis of CNTs including arc discharge, laser-vaporisation
and chemical vapour deposition (CVD), the latter being used for the synthesis of the CNx MWNTs
reported in this work. During CVD, a metal catalyst particle is deposited on a substrate, etched in
11
Carbon Nanotubes
dilute HF and then placed in a quartz boat. The boat is positioned in a CVD reaction furnace, and
after additional etching of the catalytic metal film, using NH3 gas at 750-1050 C, nano-size fine
catalytic metal particles are formed. The CNTs are grown on these fine catalytic metal sites.
Carbon Nanotubes
Eulers Theorem
Like any simple polyhedron, a SWNT satisfies Eulers theorem relating the number of vertices (C
atoms), edges (covalent bonds), and faces: V - E + F = 2. If the number of pentagons is p, and
the other (F - p) faces are all hexagonal, then the doubled number of edges (each edge belongs to
two faces) is 5p + 6(F - p), which also equals the tripled number of vertices (each trivalent carbon
is shared by three adjacent faces). A simple accounting then yields p = 12, and therefore a perfect
defectless SWNT must have exactly 12 pentagons. 37
These pentagons are positive surface disinclinations in the hexagonal lattice which provide posi13
Carbon Nanotubes
tive curvature (+60 ) for the formation of a cap to close the tube. Some CNTs also contain heptagons
which are negative surface disinclinations which provide negative curvature (-60 ), opening up the
structure.
AeEa
RT
(2.1)
Where k is the rate constant, R is the gas constant, A is the pre-exponential factor and Ea is
the activation energy. Provided that the activation energy is positive, the rate constant will increase
with increasing temperature (T). Support for this model comes from experiments on the kinetics
of growth of CNTs from acetylene on -Fe metal catalysts at 1000 C. This yields an activation
energy 39 of 142 kJmol1 , which compares favourably to the activation energy of diffusion for iron 40
of 148 kJmol1 .
Carbon Nanotubes
Figure 2.6: The growth mechanism for CNx MWNTs from Reyes-Reyes et al. 23
mentalised structure is a result of the different precipitation rates of different CNx species; when
precipitation is slow, and there is a lack of material to maintain inner CNT growth, layers will
suddenly close.
Carbon Nanotubes
Figure 2.7: Wrapping vector of a single walled CNT from Wildoer et al. 42
2.5.2 Chirality
As mentioned in section 2.1, SWNTs exhibit a spiral conformation called chirality. This strongly
affects their electronic properties, 47 via the two parameters of the atomic lattice, diameter (d) and
chiral angle (). 42,43,48 The chiral angle is the angle between the hexagon rows and the tube axis.
Consider the two-dimensional graphene sheet in fig. 2.7. In the circumferential direction (along
C), periodic boundary conditions apply, that is:
Ck
2q
(2.2)
Where k is the wave vector and q is an integer. This condition leads to a set of allowed values
for k which can be substituted into the energy dispersion relation for a graphene sheet to yield the
dispersion relations for the tube, with k labelling the various one-dimensional modes.
16
Carbon Nanotubes
na1 ma2
(2.3)
A metal can be defined as having filled bands at E f . In the case of CNTs, the way in which
we fold the graphene sheet can result in either occupied or un-occupied states at E f . These two
possibilities would make the tube either metallic or semiconductor respectively. 49
The condition for occupied states at E f is:
n-m
3p q
(2.4)
Thus:
The unit cell of the SWNT strongly depends on the choice of n and m. Dresselhaus et al. 50
proposed that three types of CNTs are possible depending on the values of (n,m):
Zigzag tubes have m = 0 and are metallic or semiconducting depending on equation 2.4. These
and armchair tubes have the smallest unit cell.
All other tubes are known as chiral and have a finite wrapping angle with 0
The diameter of the CNT is related to the (n,m) values by the Hamada vector: 51
17
30 .
Carbon Nanotubes
a n2 m2 nm
(2.5)
CNT. 53
7 A)
(2.6)
where t is time, A is area, T is the temperature difference through which the heat is being
transferred, and L is the length of the body of matter through which the heat is passing. The constant
of proportionality for equation 2.6 is the thermal conductivity () defined as:
Q
t
L
AT
(2.7)
Carbon Nanotubes
Gth
2 kB2 T
3h
(2.8)
In practice however, phonon scattering reduces the thermal conductivity, making it difficult to observe quantum thermal transport except at ultra low temperatures. 58
19
Carbon Nanotubes
References
[1] A. Oberlin, M. Endo, and T. Koyama. Filamentous growth of carbon through decomposition
of benzene. J. Cryst. Growth, 32:335349, 1976.
[2] H. W. Kroto. Semistable molecules in the laboratory and in space. Chem. Soc. Rev., 11:453
449, 1982.
[3] R. E. Smalley. DoD workshop. Washington DC, 1990.
[4] S. Iijima. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature, 354:5658, 1991.
[5] S. Iijima and T. Ichihashi. Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature, 363:603
605, 1993.
[6] D. S. Bethune, C. H. Kiang, M. S. DeVries, G. Gorman, R. Savoy, and R. Beyers. Cobalt
catalysed growth of carbon nanotubes with single-atomic-layer walls. Nature, 363:605607,
1993.
[7] J.-P. Salvetat, J.-M. Bonard, N. H. Thomson, A. J. Kulik, L. Forro, W. Benoit, and L. Zuppiroli.
Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. A, 69:255260, 1999.
[8] T. Pradeep, V. Vijayakrishnan, A. K. Santra, and C. N. R. Rao. Interaction of nitrogen with
fullerenes: Nitrogen derivatives of C60 and C70 . J. Phys. Chem., 95:1056410565, 1991.
[9] Y. Miyamoto, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie. Theoretical investigation of graphitic carbon
nitride and possible tubule forms. Solid State Commun., 102(8):605608, 1997.
[10] K. Suenaga, M. P. Johansson, N. Hellgren, E. Broitman, L. R. Wallenberg, C. Colliex, J.-E.
Sundgren, and L. Hultman. Carbon nitride nanotubulite - densely-packed and well-aligned
tubular structures. Chem. Phys. Lett., 300:695700, 1999.
[11] A. Y. Liu and R. M. Wentzcovitch.
50(14):1036210365, 1994.
Phys. Rev. B,
Carbon Nanotubes
Carbon Nanotubes
Park, and J.-M. Kim. Nitrogen-incorporated multiwalled carbon nanotubes grown by direct
current plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 23(3):930933,
2005.
[29] K. Suenaga, M. Yudasaka, C. Colliex, and S. Iijima. Radially modulated nitrogen distribution
in CNx nanotubular structures by CVD using Ni phthalocyanine. Chem. Phys. Lett., 316:365
372, 2000.
[30] J. Kotakoski, A. V. Krasheninnikov, Y. Ma, A. S. Foster, K. Nordlund, and R. M. Nieminen. B
and N ion implantation into carbon nanotubes: Insight from atomistic simulations. Phys. Rev.
B, 71:205408, 2005.
[31] H. C. Choi, S. Y. Bae, J. Park, K. Seo, C. Kim, B. Kim, H. J. Song, and H.-J. Shin. Experimental and theoretical studies on the structure on the structure of N-doped carbon nanotubes:
Possibility of intercalated molecular N2 . Appl. Phys. Lett., 85(23):57425744, 2004.
[32] D. Srivastava, M. Menon, C. Daraio, S. Jin, B. Sadanadan, and A. M. Rao. Vacancy-mediated
mechanism of nitrogen substitution in carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B, 69:153414, 2004.
[33] J. W. Jang, C. E. Lee, T. J. Lee, S. C. Lyu, and C. J. Lee. Lateral force microscopy of bambooshaped multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Curr. Appl. Phys., 6:141144, 2006.
[34] M. Lin, J. P. Y. Tan, C. Boothroyd, K. P. Loh, E. S. Tok, and Y.-L. Foo. Direct observation of
single-walled carbon nanotube growth at the atomistic scale. Nano Lett., 6(3):449452, 2006.
[35] D. Zhou and L. Chow. Complex structure of carbon nanotubes and their implications for
formation mechanism. J. Appl. Phys., 93(12):99729976, 2003.
[36] S. Iijima, P. M. Ajayan, and T. Ichihashi. Growth model for carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev.
Lett., 69(21):31013103, 1992.
[37] http://www.americanscientist.org. Fullerene nanotubes: C1 000 000 and beyond.
[38] C. L. Lee, J. H. Park, and J. Park. Synthesis of bamboo-shaped multiwalled carbon nanotubes
using thermal chemical vapor deposition. Chem. Phys. Lett., 323:560565, 2000.
[39] R. T. K. Baker, J. J. Chludzinski, and C. R. F. Lund. Activation energy of carbon nanotubes.
In Extended abstracts of the 18th Biennial Conference on Carbon, page 155, Worcester Polytechnic Institution, 1987.
[40] C. J. Smithells, E. A. Brandes, and G. B. Brook, editors. Smithells Metals Reference Book.
Butterworth-Heinemann, 7th edition, 1992.
[41] M. Terrones, P. M. Ajayan, F. Banhardt, X. Blase, D. L. Carroll, J.-C. Charlier, R. Czerw,
B. Foley, N. Grobert, R. Kamalakaran, P. Kohler-Redlich, T. Seeger, and H. Terrones. Ndoping and coalescence of carbon nanotubes: synthesis and electronic properties. Appl. Phys.
A, 74:355361, 2002.
[42] J. M. Wildoer, L. C. Venema, A. G. Rinzler, R. E. Smalley, and C. Dekker. Electronic strucure
and electronic of atomically resolved carbon nanotubes. Nature, 391:5961, 1998.
22
Carbon Nanotubes
[43] T. W. Odom, J.-L. Heung, P. Kim, and C. M. Lieber. Atomic structure and electronic properties
of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature, 391:6264, 1998.
[44] H. Ago, T. Kugler, F. Cacialli, W. R. Salaneck, M. S. P. Shaffer, A. H. Windle, and R. H.
Friend. Work functions and surface functional groups of multiwall carbon nanotubes. J. Phys.
Chem. B., 103:81168121, 1999.
[45] M. A. Pimenta, A. Marucci, S. D. M. Brown, and M. J. Matthews. Resonant raman effect in
single-wall carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Res., 13(9):23962404, 1998.
[46] B. Stojetz, C. Miko, L. Forro, and C. Strunk. Effect of band structure on quantum intereference
in multiwall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:186802, 2005.
[47] R. Saito, M. Fujita, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus. Electronic structure of chiral
graphene tubules. Appl. Phys. Lett., 60:22042206, 1992.
[48] A. Bezryadin, A. R. M. Verschueren, S. J. Tans, and C. Dekker. Multiprobe transport experiments on single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80(18):40364039, 1998.
[49] R. J. Nicholas. Optical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes, Department of Physics Seminar,
2004.
[50] M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and P. C. Eklund. Science of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes. Academic Press Inc., New York, 1st edition, 1996.
[51] X. Liu, T. Pichler, M. Knupfer, M. S. Golden, J. Fink, H. Kataura, and Y. Achiba. Detailed
analysis of the mean diameter and diameter distribution of single-wall carbon nanotubes from
their optical response. Phys. Rev. B, 66:045411, 2002.
[52] R. Saito, M. S. Dresselhaus, and G. Dresselhaus. Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes.
Imperial College Press, 1998.
[53] R. Saito, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus. Tunneling conductance of connected carbon
nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B, 53(4):20442050, 1996.
[54] Z. Yao, J.-S. Wang, B. Li, and G.-R. Liu. Thermal conductance of carbon nanotubes using
molecular dynamics. Phys. Rev. B, 71:085417, 2005.
[55] J. Hone, M. Whitney, C. Piskoti, and A. Zettl. Thermal conductivity of single-walled carbon
nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B, 59(4):25142516, 1999.
[56] W. Yi, L. Lu, Z. Dian-lin, Z. W. Pan, and S. S. Xie. Linear specific heat of carbon nanotubes.
Phys. Rev. B, 59(14):90159018, 1999.
[57] D. G. Cahill, W. K. Ford, K. E. Goodson, G. D. Mahan, A. Majumdar, H. J. Maris, R. Merlin,
and S. R. Phillpot. Nanoscale thermal transport. Appl. Phys. Rev., 93(2):793818, 2003.
[58] H.-Y. Chiu, V. V. Deshpande, H. W. Ch. Postma, C. N. Lau, C. Miko, L. Forro, and M. Bockrath. Ballistic phonon thermal transport in multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett.,
95:226101, 2005.
23
Carbon Nanotubes
[59] E. Brown, L. Hao, J. C. Gallop, and J. C. Macfarlane. Ballistic thermal and electrical conductance measurements on individual multiwall carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett., 87:023107,
2005.
[60] T. Yamamoto, S. Watanabe, and K. Watanabe. Universal features of quantized thermal conductance of carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92(7):075502, 2004.
24
Chapter 3
Experimental Techniques
3.1 Atomic Force Microscopy
AFM is one of a family of microscopy techniques that comes under the umbrella term Scanning
Probe Microscopy. 1 The first example of this type of microscopy was Scanning Tunelling Microscopy (STM), which generated an image by measuring a tunneling current between a conducting
surface and a conducting tip. AFM does not rely on tunneling to probe local properties of a sample,
but rather on the tip-sample force interaction.
Experimental Techniques
1. Orientation Forces
2. Induction Forces
3. Dispersion Forces
Orientation forces arise from the interaction of two polar molecules. The permanent dipole moments on each molecule interact to generate an attractive force known as dipole-dipole interactions.
For two anti-parallel dipoles (A and B) in their ground states, interacting in adjacent bundles, the
interaction energy is given by: 2
UAB
A B
40 r3
(3.1)
where A and B are the corresponding dipole moments, 0 is the permittivity of free space,
the permittivity of the material and r is the separation between them.
Induction forces arise from the interaction of a polar molecule with a non-polar molecule. The
polar molecule induces a dipole on a nearby non-polar molecule, generating an attractive force
known as a dipole-induced dipole interaction.
Dispersion forces are the most important form of interaction to consider in the context of understanding AFM. Their existence was proposed by London 3 in 1937, who suggested that the electrons
in a neutral molecule are in continuous motion. Thus for very short time intervals, these molecules
will possess finite fluctuating dipole and higher multipole moments. On adjacent molecules, the
interaction of simultaneously created dipoles gives rise to an attractive force. Mathematically, the
dispersion energy cannot be completely described in classical terms, as its origins are quantum
mechanical. It takes the form:
Udisp
32 I
440 2 r6
(3.2)
where r is the distance between two interacting molecules, is the polarisability and I is the
ionisation potential. Thus the dispersion force is proportional to r7 , demonstrating that dispersion
forces are long-range and rapidly increase as molecules are brought together, mutually aligning
26
Experimental Techniques
Figure 3.1: Scheme of the tip interacting with the sample. The little circles represent atoms (Kislon
Votchovsky).
neighbouring molecules. VDWs forces are important in the understanding of the interactions within
CNT bundles, 4 and will be discussed further in section 7.4.1.
Electrostatic Forces
Although VDWs forces play a significant role in the tip-sample interaction. When the sample and
tip are charged, the largest physical influence between them will be the electrostatic or Coulombic
force. For two oppositely charged ions q1 and q2 in a vacuum, with a separation r the force between
them is given by:
q1 q2
40 r2
(3.3)
As the ions are brought closer together the attractive force between them rises sharply until
eventually the outer electrons around each ion interact, and repel each other.
Lennard-Jones Potential
Repulsive forces also result when a tip and sample interact at a small distance, counteracting the
attractive dispersion forces. Imagine that an atom at the very apex of the AFM tip, interacts with a
particle at the surface of the sample (see fig. 3.1).
The behaviour of the potential energy as the distance r between them changes (fig. 3.2). It can
be described by the pair-potential energy function Epair r. In the case of hard spheres, as we are
27
Experimental Techniques
E pair r
12
(3.4)
Capillary Forces
Additional forces also contribute to the potential between the tip and sample, particularly when
imaging in different media. In air for example, the tip resting on a surface is an ideal nucleation site
for the condensation of water vapour present in the air. This means that the tip will be pulled down
towards the sample by a strong liquid meniscus, giving rise to a so-called capillary force. 1
28
Experimental Techniques
kd
(3.5)
where k is the force constant and d is its displacement. The resonant frequency (f ) of the
cantilever is given by:
1
2
k
m
(3.6)
where m is the effective mass of the cantilever. k increases with lever thickness but decreases
with cantilever length.
AFM uses the tip-sample force interaction to generate an image consisting of many rows or
lines of information placed one above the other. 5
AFM tips are not infinitely sharp and so every image is a convolution of the actual surface
topography. The image obtained also depends upon the shape of the tip and the interaction potential.
29
Experimental Techniques
2 nm in diameter) an effect
known as probe broadening can occur. Only the hemispherical region at the tip apex touches the
molecule, and the width of the molecule is overestimated even with very accurate calibration of the
instrument.
100 kHz)
at the end of the cantilever, deriving topographic images from measurement of the attractive or
repulsive forces between the tip and sample, at an intermittent distance (fig. 3.4). There is still
contact as defined above [fig. 3.2(a)], but the cantilever taps the surface for only a very small fraction
of its oscillation period.
3.1.5 Feedback
AFMs use feedback to regulate the force on the sample. The AFM not only measures the force on
the sample but also regulates it, allowing acquisition of images at very low forces.
30
Experimental Techniques
Figure 3.4: Tip engagement procedure in tapping mode. It is first necessary to tune the cantilever
to its resonance frequency and to assess a setpoint amplitude smaller than the free resonance amplitude. The engagement procedure is complete when the oscillation amplitude of the cantilever has
decreased to the setpoint amplitude. (Kislon Votchovsky)
Figure 3.5: Laser deflection off the cantilever striking the photodetector
31
Experimental Techniques
In contact mode the feedback loop consists of a tube scanner which controls the height of the
entire sample, the cantilever and optical lever, which measures the local height of the sample, and a
feedback circuit that attempts to keep the cantilever deflection constant. In AC mode the feedback
system keeps the amplitude of the tip constant, rather than its deflection. However, both systems
work by adjusting the voltage applied to a piezo, a tube-shaped material that expands or contracts in
the presence of an electric field or conversely, creates a potential difference when forced to expand
or contract. 6 AFM feedback loops tend to have a bandwidth of about 10 kHz, resulting in image
acquisition times of about 1 min. 5
For this work a Dimension 3100 scanning probe microscope system (Veeco Instruments) with
the NanoScope IV controller was used. The scanning head was operated using the NanoScope v 6.2
r1 software and AC images were taken using OMCL - AC 240 TS cantilevers from Olympus. AFM
was used in this work to image and measure the length and diameter of CNx MWNTs before and
after acid treatment, and to characterize the CNx MWNT/protein conjugates. Electrical transport
measurements were also taken using an AFM method.
300 - 800 nm. Photons within this range possess sufficient energy
to promote or excite a molecular electron to a higher energy orbital. This molecule is known as
excited and has an energy Ee , whereas the ground state molecule has the energy Eg . The energy of
the radiation absorbed must equal the difference between these two energies:
Ee Eg
(3.7)
Where h is Plancks constant and is the frequency of the photon. When sample molecules
are exposed to light which has an energy that matches a possible electronic transition within the
molecule, some of the light energy will be absorbed as the electron is promoted to a higher energy
32
Experimental Techniques
c
E
(3.8)
where is the wavelength of the UV-vis spectroscopy was used in this work to ascertain the effect of adsorption to CNx MWNTs on metalloproteins by monitoring their characteristic absorbance
spectra.
Experimental Techniques
Figure 3.7: The amide bond (N-C=O) and nearest C neighbours (C and C ). The arrows indicate
possible bond rotations
Experimental Techniques
obs
10 c l N
(3.9)
where l is the length of the liquid cell and N is the number of amino acid residues in the protein.
3.4 Lyophilization
Lyophilization (or freeze-drying) is a process which extracts the water from biological and other
molecules so that they remain stable and are easier to store at room temperature. Lyophilization
is carried out using sublimation which is the transition of a substance from the solid to the vapour
phase, without first passing through the intermediate liquid phase. Under a vacuum, the ice is
sublimed directly into water vapour which is then drawn off. A cold condenser chamber and/or
condenser plates provide a surface for the vapour to re-solidify on. The surface must be colder than
the temperature of the surface of the material being dried, or the vapour will not migrate to the
collector.
In a typical phase diagram (fig. 3.8), the boundary between gas and liquid runs from the triple
point to the critical point. Lyophilization (blue arrow) brings the system around the triple point,
avoiding the direct liquid-gas transition seen in ordinary drying (green arrow). A VirTis 2K Lyophilizer
was used in this work to obtain solid CNx MWNTs from solution, after acid oxidation.
35
Experimental Techniques
References
[1] V. J. Morris, A. J. Kirby, and A. P. Gunning. Atomic Force Microscopy for Biologists. Imperial
College Press, 1st edition, 1999.
[2] N. Israelachivli. Intermolecular and Surface Forces. Academic Press, 2nd edition, 1992.
[3] F. London. The general theory of molecular forces. Transactions of the Faraday Society, pages
826, 1937.
[4] Z. Chen, K. Kobashi, U. Rauwald, R. Booker, H. Fan, W.-F. Hwang, and J. M. Tour. Soluble
ultra-short single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128:1056810571, 2006.
[5] D. Baselt. The tip-sample interaction in atomic force microscopy and its implications for
biological applications. PhD, California Institute of Technology, 1993.
[6] J. A. Gallego-Juarez. Piezoelectric ceramics and ultrasonic transducers. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 22:804816, 1989.
[7] A. P. Demchenko. Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of Proteins. Springer-Verlag, Kiev, 1986.
[8] K. D. Ausman, R. Piner, O. Lourie, R. S. Ruoff, and M. Korobov. Organic solvent dispersions
of single-walled carbon nanotubes: Toward solutions of pristine nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. B.,
104:89118915, 2000.
[9] O. Jost, A. A. Gorbunov, W. Pompe, T. Pichler, R. Friedlein, M. Knupfer, M. Reibold,
H.-D. Bauer, L. Dunsch, M. S. Golden, and J. Fink. Diameter grouping in bulk samples
of single-walled carbon nanotubes from optical absorption spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett.,
75(15):22172219, 1999.
[10] G. Dukovic, M. Balaz, P. Doak, N. Berova, M. Zheng, R. S. McLean, and L. Brus. Racemic
single-walled carbon nanotubes exhibit circular dichroism when warpped with DNA. J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 128:90049005, 2006.
36
Chapter 4
Ti
i 1
2e2
h
37
TiG0
i 1
(4.1)
where G0 = 2e2 /h = 1/(12.9 k) and the sum runs over the M available quantum channels.
Ti are the transmission factors of each channel with 0
Ti
nanotubes which are metallic, there are two pz derived bands at E f one even and one odd under the
n axial mirror symmetries of the tube. As a result, one expects a single armchair SWNT to have a
conductance of Te To G0 where Te and To are the transmission coefficients of the odd and even
bands respectively. If the transmission coefficients are unity, we then get a conductance of 2 G0 at
Ef.
4.1.2 SWNTs
Individual SWNTs between two electrodes can behave as molecular quantum wires 5 showing ballistic conductance. A ballistic conductor is one in which an electron injected at one end will emerge at
the other with certainty. Therefore, there is no backscattering of electrons, which yields an intrinsic
electric resistance. 6 Observable at low temperature, sections of SWNT may act as small islands with
very low capacitance (1018 F). These islands have charging energy sufficient to produce a Coulomb
blockade effect. Conductance peaks are then observed as gate voltage (Vg ) is varied, giving a field
effect transistor (FET). 7
4.1.3 MWNTs
Ballistic electrical transport has also been observed in MWNTs, 8 but some debate exists, 9 with
Schonenberger et al. 10 labelling their MWNTs quasi-ballistic.
These discrepancies arise because most investigated MWNTs cannot be described as perfect
sets of coaxial cylinders, but exhibit defects which can affect the transport mechanisms. 11 Electron
microscopy investigations show that MWNTs generally consist of shells of different helicity, such
that one atomic layer can be a metal and another a semiconductor. 12 From section 2.5.2, depending
on diameter, we can predict that
1
3
Langer et al. 13 claimed that the electric current flows in the outermost (metallic) nanotube wall
only, even if successive inner layers are metallic. However the results of Bourlon et al. 14 revealed
a substantial contribution from conduction in the second shell through tunelling. The ratio between
38
the contribution of the outermost shell and the (possible) contributions of internal shells can be
described by the ratio: 12
Rext
Rt
(4.2)
where Rext is the resistance of the external shell and Rt is the resistance connecting this shell
to internal shells ( 10 km1 ). 14 is expected to be temperature dependent, but for metallic
nanotubes
1.
Observation of 1 G0
Frank et al. 8 observed a conductance close to the quantized value 1 G0 for MWNTs. This is half the
expected value of 2 G0 , and several explanations have been proposed to rationalize this observation.
The first possibility is that in MWNTs an additional effect of inter-tube interaction appears. The
hopping of electrons between the tubes leads to a further splitting of otherwise degenerate energy
levels, the separation of which is governed by the probability of electron tunneling between adjacent
tubes. A metallic nanotube has two extended electron bands crossing E f , but when moving away
from E f more bands are able to contribute to the current, an effect that gives a corresponding increase in G. In reality, since a nanotube is never perfect, the propagating electrons will be scattered
by lattice defects, phonons or contacts. 15,16 Delaney et al. 4 considered the effect of inter-tube interactions at E f . These interactions perturb the band structure of the nanotubes significantly and cause
existing even and odd bands to repel each other, creating a depletion of states at E f . In graphite,
similar inter-layer interactions reduce the local density of states at E f by a factor of 12 . As long as
this repulsion is greater than the small bias voltages used in the experiment, these other states will
not be available for transport.
A second possibility, revealed by ab initio calculations is that of scattering. For the two contributing subbands at E f for an (n, n) CNT, one of the channels is (bonding) and the other
(antibonding). In addition, whilst the channel carries electrons through the nanotube without
scattering, the channel experiences resonant scattering by coupling to the metal contact. As a
39
(4.3)
Fig. 4.1 shows the calculated local density of states (LDOS) for CNx MWNTs (black) for both
armchair (a) and zigzag (b) tubes. The arrow indicates an additional donor feature occuring at
0.8 eV. By comparing these data with un-doped CNTs (red) it can be seen that nitrogen-doping is
responsible for the prominent donor like features close to E f . As a direct result of doping with N,
the semiconducting (zigzag) nanotube becomes metallic. This occurs because two frontier bands
overlap and become partially filled, producing a new band with zero band gap. 20
Yang et al. also determined the electronic structure of nitrogen-doped nanotubes and found that
the density of states at E f decreased with increasing concentration of pyridinic nitrogen. 24
40
Figure 4.1: Theoretical LDOS for (a) an armchair and (b) a zigzag CNT. The LDOS of the un-doped
CNT is shown in red, and the LDOS for the CNx CNT is shown in black. Image is taken from Czerw
et al. 20
The tunneling spectroscopy measurements and theoretical calculations of Czerw et al. 20 suggest
that CNx MWNTs are metallic. In addition Golberg et al. 25 reported resistivities of 10-100 k for
ropes of CNx MWNTs. An individual CNx MWNT FET has also been reported, 26 which had a conductance of
0.01 G0 for zero voltage gate bias. This conductance is much lower than the intrinsic
value of 2 G0 at E f predicted by theory for a (10,10) metallic SWNT doped with nitrogen. 11 Hence
experimental measurements of the intrinsic conductance of individual CNx MWNTs, which are not
limited by high contact resistances, are required in order to gain an understanding of their electrical
transport properties and potential applications. Furthermore, un-doped MWNTs are known to have
an extremely high power threshold for breakdown, 27 and can withstand currents up to 0.5 mA, 28
but the effect of N-doping on these properties is unknown.
41
4.3 Experimental
Interfacing a single CNT to a conducting substrate, in order to take conductance measurements
is normally hampered by very large contact resistances, caused by scattering. By measuring the
properties of individual CNT protruding from a larger flake and using a graphite surface (with
similar crystal structure and lattice spacing) we can approximate an ideal system. 3 In addition,
as the CNTs are free-standing, the possibility of influence or current leakage from the underlying
substrate is reduced. 29
The flakes of CNx MWNTs used are densely packed and typically 100 m in diameter and up
to 2 mm long. The CNx MWNTs show extraordinary alignment [fig. 4.3(b)] and narrower bundles
protrude from the flake which in turn taper towards individual tubes at their ends [fig. 4.3(c)].
Figure 4.3: (a) AC-AFM image of an individual CNx MWNT (Sonia Antoranz Contera) (b) SEM
image of the flake between the arms of the probe (Jian Li) (c) SEM image of an individual CNx
MWNT protruding from the flake (Jian Li) (d) circuit diagram of the set-up used in the experiment.
43
(Highly Ordered Pyrolytic Graphite) until a stable mechanical contact was realized. The force
applied to the probe was kept constant during subsequent electrical measurements. The probe was
held at system ground whilst an HP 3245A Universal Source was used to apply a voltage (VDC )
across the flake and a 1 k resistor in series [fig. 4.3(d)]. The resistor was used to limit the current
across the CNx MWNT. The voltage drop across it (VNT ) and the voltage drop across the resistor
(VR ) were measured simultaneously using Fluke 8842A multimeters, allowing the conductance G
to be calculated. Measurements were conducted on the individual CNx MWNTs protruding from
the end of the flake [fig. 4.3(c)]. Several different flakes were used, which were regularly re-oriented
to expose new individual CNx MWNTs.
4.4 Results
4.4.1 Annealing
Fig. 4.4 is a conductance versus time plot showing mechanical contact at 40 s, after which a conductance of 1 G0 was measured for an applied voltage of 1.0 V (VDC ). Between 60 and 210 s, VDC was
swept between -3V and +3V whilst the conductance was measured, shown in the G-V plot (inset).
In the first part of the voltage sweep, from 0 - 2.6 V (VNT ), the slope of the G-V curve was
steeper and the conductance values smaller than in subsequent sweeps. We have attributed this to
an annealing process at the contact, and hence a reduction in the contact resistance. This was
probably achieved by a cleaning procedure 30 involving the burning away of poorly conducting
material (e.g. water or trapped hydrocarbons) between the CNx MWNT and the HOPG or a change
in the contact geometry. 19 After the initial voltage sweep, a reproducible G-V curve was observed.
For times between 210 and 240 s [fig. 4.4(a)] a constant potential (VDC ) of 1.0 V was applied and a
post-annealing contact of 1.2 G0 was measured.
different contacts made between the CNx MWNT flake and the HOPG. Statistical analysis of the
44
Figure 4.4: (a) Conductance measurements made during the initial approach of the flake, followed
by a stable mechanical contact between the CNx MWNT and the HOPG. Inset shows the annealing
of the CNx MWNT/HOPG contact during the initial voltage sweep. (b) Statistical analysis of all
77 contacts made after annealing at VNT 2.0 V. The histogram shows that 70% of the contacts
were in the range 0 - 2 G0 . (c) Histogram for conductance values between 0 and 2 G0 only.
45
results, [figs. 4.4(b) and (c)], indicates two different systems; individual CNx MWNTs with conductance values close to 1 G0 , and bundles of CNx MWNTs exhibiting larger values of conductance,
between 2 and 17 G0 . For those contacts (
CNx MWNTs show high conductances and that the contact resistance is low. The high conductances could either indicate that the CNx MWNTs are intrinsically metallic or that they are doped
semiconductors with narrow or vanishing bandgaps. High conductance throughout an entire sample of MWNTs is potentially advantageous for many applications such as field emission devices,
biosensors and nanoelectronic components including interconnects.
The low conductances measured in the work of others 25,26 may be due to physical and chemical
differences in the raw CNx MWNTs, damage to the sample caused by processing, or high contact
resistances due to Schottky barriers or poor physical contact at the NT-electrode interfaces.
0.2 G0/V which is larger than previous measurements for un-doped MWNTs of
0.27 G0 /V 31 and 0.3 G0 /V. 18 The difference probably indicates that in our CNx MWNTs, additional
subbands become available at high voltages. 18
46
Figure 4.5: (a) G-V curve and (b) corresponding I-V curve for an individual CNx MWNT, (c) G-V
curve and (d) corresponding I-V curve for a bundle of CNx MWNTs.
Individual CNx MWNT contacts were then subjected to electrical breakdown by increasing VDC
gradually to a maximum of 3 V. Fig. 4.6 (a) shows the breakdown of an individual CNx MWNT
which begins with a steady decline in current down to 60 A, followed by a series of sharp steps
probably associated with the removal of individual layers. 32 Fig. 4.6 (b) shows both increasing and
decreasing current steps, similar to previous observations for un-doped MWNTs, 33 which were
assigned to processes involving the breakdown of inner layers or a combination of inner and outer
layers. The more common observation of decreasing steps only [fig. 4.6(c)] has been associated with
the breakdown of outer layers only. For the 20 electrical breakdown measurements of CNx MWNTs
made, 8 resulted in steps after significant electrical breakdown of the tube (G = 0.3 G0 ). Step sizes
were in the range 6-40 A with an average size of 20 10 A. The irregular step sizes presented
in this work may be attributed to varying degrees of N-doping in different layers, differences in
inter-layer coupling or the breakdown of several layers simultaneously.
47
Figure 4.6: Electrical breakdown of individual CNx MWNTs showing; (a) gradual decline in current
followed by discrete steps (b) both increasing and decreasing current step and (c) another example
of steps during breakdown. The numbers adjacent to the arrows indicate the magnitudes of the steps
in A.
Power Threshold values
The threshold power (Pthresh ), the highest power reached during the breakdown, was also calculated
and found to be 490
100 W. This is larger than the value of 300 W previously reported for
48
References
[1] C. P. Poole Jr. and F. J. Owens. Carbon Nanotubes. John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2003.
[2] S. Sapmaz, P. Jarillo-Herrero, J. Kong, C. Dekker, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and H. S. J. Van der
Zwan. Electronic excitation of metallic carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B, 71:153402, 2005.
[3] E. Brown, L. Hao, J. C. Gallop, and J. C. Macfarlane. Ballistic thermal and electrical conductance measurements on individual multiwall carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett., 87:023107,
2005.
[4] P. Delaney, M. Di Ventra, and S. T. Pantelides. Quantized conductance of multiwalled carbon
nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett., 75(24):37873789, 1999.
[5] R. Saito, M. S. Dresselhaus, and G. Dresselhaus. Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes.
Imperial College Press, 1998.
[6] http://www.nd.edu/ techrev/Archive/Winter2002/a6.html. Carbon nanotubes, wunderkind materials, 2002.
[7] V. Skakalova, A. B. Kaiser, Y.-S. Woo, and S. Roth. Electronic transport in carbon nanotubes:
From individual nanotubes to thin and thick networks. Phys. Rev. B, 74:085403, 2006.
[8] S. Frank, P. Poncharal, Z. L. Wang, and W. A. de Heer. Carbon nanotube quantum resistors.
Science, 280:17441746, 1998.
[9] M. Zamkov, N. Woody, B. Shan, Z. Chang, and P. Richard. Lifetime of charge carriers in
multiwalled nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:056803, 2005.
[10] C. Schonenberger, A. Bachtold, C. Strunk, J.-P. Salvetat, and L. Forro. Interference and interaction in multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. A, 69:283295, 1999.
[11] H. J. Choi, J. Ihm, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen. Defects, quasibound states and quantum
conductance in metallic carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84(13):29172920, 2000.
[12] A. Y. Kasumov, H. Bouchiat, B. Reulet, O. Stephan, I. I. Khodos, Y. B. Gorbatov, and C. Colliex. Conductivity and atomic structure of isolated multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Europhys.
Lett., 43(1):88994, 1998.
[13] L. Langer, E. Bayot, E. Grivei, J.-P. Issi, J. P. Heremans, C. H. Olk, L. Stockman, C. van
Haesendonck, and Y. Bruynseraede. Quantum transport in a multiwalled carbon nanotube.
Phys. Rev. Lett., 76(3):479482, 1996.
[14] B. Bourlon, C. Miko, L. Forro, D. C. Glattli, and A. Bachtold. Determination of the intershell
conductance in the multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93(17):176806, 2004.
[15] M. P. Anantram and T. R. Govindan. Conductance of carbon nanotubes with disorder: A
numerical study. Phys. Rev. B., 58(8):48824887, 1998.
[16] V. H. Crespi, M. L. Cohen, and A. Rubio. In situ band gap engineering of carbon nanotubes.
Phys. Rev. Lett., 79(11):20932096, 1997.
49
[17] H. J. Choi, J. Ihm, Y.-G. Yoon, and S. G. Louie. Possible explanation for the conductance of a
single quantum unit in metallic carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B, 60(20):1400914011, 1999.
[18] P. Poncharal, C. Berger, Y. Yi, L. Wang, and W. A. de Heer. Room temperature ballistic
conduction in carbon nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. B., 106:1210412118, 2002.
[19] C. Berger, Y. Yi, J. Gezo, P. Poncharal, and W. A. de Heer. Contacts, non-linear transport
effects and failure in multi-walled carbon nanotubes. New J. Phys., 5:158.1, 2003.
[20] R. Czerw, M. Terrones, J.-C. Charlier, X. Blase, B. Foley, R. Kamalakaran, N. Grobert, H. Terrones, P. M. Ajayan, W. Blau, D. Tekleab, M. Ruhle, and D. L. Carroll. Identification of
electron donor states in N-doped carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett., 1(9):457460, 2001.
[21] Y. Huang, J. Gao, and R. Liu. Structure and electronic properties of nitrogen-containing carbon
nanotubes. Synth. Met., 113:251255, 2000.
[22] R. Sen, B. C. Satishkumar, A. Govindaraj, K. R. Harikumar, G. Raina, J.-P. Zhang, A. K.
Cheetham, and C. N. R. Rao. B-C-N, C-N and B-N nanotubes produced by the pyrolysis of
precursor molecules over Co catalysts. Chem. Phys. Lett., 287:671676, 1998.
[23] S. H. Lim, H. I. Elim, X. Y. Gao, A. T. S. Wee, W. Ji, J. Y. Lee, and J. Lin. Electronic and
optical properties of nitrogen-doped multiwall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B, 73:045402,
2006.
[24] J. H. Yang, B. J. Kim, Y. H. Kim, Y. J. Lee, B. H. Ha, Y. S. Shin, S.-Y. Park, H. S. Kim, C.-Y.
Park, C.-W. Yang, J.-B. Yoo, M. H. Kwon, K. Ihm, H.-J. Song, T.-H. Kang, H.-J. Shin, J.-Y.
Park, and J.-M. Kim. Nitrogen-incorporated multiwalled carbon nanotubes grown by direct
current plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 23(3):930933,
2005.
[25] D. Golberg, P. S. Dorozhkin, Y. Bando, Z.-C. Dong, C. C. Tang, Y. Uemura, N. Grobert,
M. Reyes-Reyes, H. Terrones, and M. Terrones. Structure, transport and field-emission properties of compound nanotubes: CNx vs BNCx (x 0.1). Appl. Phys. A, 76:499507, 2003.
[26] K. Xiao, Y. Liu, P. Hu, G. Yu, Y. Sun, and D. Zhu. n-type field-effect transistors made of an
individual nitrogen-doped multiwalled carbon nanotube. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127:86148617,
2005.
[27] P. G. Collins, M. S. Arnold, and P. Avouris. Engineering carbon nanotubes and nanotube
circuits using electrical breakdown. Science, 292:706, 2001.
[28] B. Bourlon, D. C. Glattli, B. Placais, J. M. Berroir, C. Miko, L. Forro, and A. Bachtold.
Geometrical dependence of high-bias current in multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev.
Lett., 92(2):026804, 2004.
[29] P. Dorozhkin, H. Nejoh, and D. Fujita. Low-energy electron point source microscope as a tool
for transport measurements of free-standing nanometer-scale objects: Application to carbon
nanotubes. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 20(3):10441047, 2002.
50
51
Chapter 5
Structure of antibodies
Antibodies consists of four polypeptides; two heavy chains and two light chains, which join to form
a Y shaped molecule (fig. 5.1). The amino acid sequence in the tips of the Y, varies greatly among
different antibodies. This variable region, composed of 110-130 amino acids, give the antibody its
specificity for binding its antigen. Immunoglobulins (Ig) are divided into five major classes, IgM,
IgG, IgA, IgD and IgE, based on their structure and immune function. 37 In this work, the antibodies
used are IgG immunoglobins.
5.3 Experimental
In this work CNx MWNTs were functionalised with metalloproteins (proteins containing at least
one metal ion, usually a transition metal with a variety of accessible oxidation states) using a noncovalent scheme. Both raw and acid-treated (see Chapter 7) CNx MWNTs were functionalised
54
with the Fe-containing proteins ferritin, ferredoxin and cytochrome c and the Cu-containing protein
azurin. It has been proposed that the acid groups generated during oxidation may assist in the
anchoring of biological species to the CNT. 22,23,34 In the following work this proposal is addressed
systematically for CNx MWNTs.
5.3.2 Spectroscopy
CD and UV-vis spectra of free cyt c (concentrated cyt c in solution in the absence of CNx MWNTs)
and free azurin were taken against a 5 mM phosphate buffer background. CNx MWNTs/protein
conjugates were then added prepared as above, and any un-adsorbed protein removed. Protein
concentrations before and after this procedure were calculated from absorbance spectra. Extensive
control experiments were carried out to monitor the effect of environmental conditions such as
55
Preparation of Apoazurin
The copper atom in azurin can be eliminated to create apoazurin without change in the overall
structure of the protein. 40 Apoazurin is not available commercially but can be prepared by a series
of dialysis experiments to reduce the Cu ion and then complex it out of the protein. 41,42
In this work apoazurin was prepared using the method of Blaszak et al. 41 Native azurin was
reduced with ascorbate in MiliQ water to give azurin which has a colourless Cu centre. Azurin
solution was then dialysed against 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer containing 0.25 M NaCl and 0.1
M thiourea (a Cu complexing agent) for at least 12 h. The complexing agent was then removed by
a second dialysis against 0.1 M phosphate buffer (adjusted to pH 7 using NaOH) for at least 12 h.
All dialyses were carried out at 5-10 C using an ice bath. The absence of azurin was determined
by UV-vis spectroscopy.
Crystallization of Apoferritin
Apoferritin readily forms crystals in sodium acetate solution containing certain amounts of cadmium
sulphate. 43 Apoferritin was prepared in 0.2 M sodium acetate (NaOOCH3 ) buffer, with pH 5.0
56
5.4 Results
5.4.1 Ferredoxin
Ferredoxin is a small (12 kDa) water-soluble protein containing at least one ion-sulphur cluster. 37
It is acidic, and found in various organisms where it acts as a multifunctional electron carrier. In
particular, ferredoxin (fig. 5.2) is a carrier molecule in the electron transport chain in photosynthesis,
passing electrons to NADP reductase. It also has a role in nitrogen fixation. 44
Structure
The iron-sulphur clusters (brown) contain one or more Fe ions usually chelated by cysteine residues
(see section 10.5 for amino acid structures), whose S atoms coordinate to the metal. The clusters
can be of the type [4Fe - 4S], [3Fe - 3S] or [2Fe - 4S] with a charge from 0
+3.
Fig. 5.3 shows individual raw [(a) and (b)] and acid-treated [(c) and (d)] CNx MWNTs function57
Figure 5.3: AC-AFM images of individual raw [(a) and (c)] and acid-treated [(b) and (d)] CNx
MWNTs functionalised with ferredoxin
58
alised with ferredoxin. In these AFM images, the individual CNx MWNTs are distinguishable from
the globular structures which represent the ferredoxin molecules. For the raw tubes [fig. 5.3(a) and
(b)] coverage is poor, with only a few proteins attached to the surface. The ferredoxin molecules
bind to the raw CNx MWNT in the form of large clusters
arrows in (a)]. In comparison, the acid-treated tubes [fig. 5.3(c) and (d)] are more evenly covered in
smaller ferredoxin clusters
for adsorption to neighbouring (hydrophilic) proteins over adsorption to the mainly hydrophobic
surface of the raw CNx MWNT. The areas where ferredoxin does bind on the raw CNx MWNT
may indicate the location of pyridinic nitrogen sites on the CNx MWNT surface. The activity of
adsorbed ferredoxin could not be investigated by spectroscopy as it does not exhibit a characteristic
UV-vis spectrum. In addition, anti-ferredoxin is not available commercially.
The improved adsorption of ferredoxin to acid-treated CNx MWNTs is due to additional interactions between the protein, and oxygenated groups on the acid-treated CNx MWNTs 45 (see
Chapter 7). These interactions are most likely to be hydrogen bonds, but the possibility of covalent
amide linkages (section 10.5.1) between protein -NH2 (amine) moieties and -COOH (carboxylic
acid) groups on the CNx MWNTs cannot be excluded.
5.4.2 Ferritin
Ferritin (fig. 5.4) stores Fe (red) intracellularly in the liver in mammals and is also found in plants,
fungi and bacteria. Ferritins belong to the Class II diiron-carboxylate proteins and have the capacity
to remove Fe2 ions from solution in the presence of O2 , and to deposit up to 4500 Fe atoms into the
protein interior in a mineral form (Fe2 O3 .H2 O). Fe is stored as its ferric hydroxide rather than as an
ion, because the solution chemistry of Fe at physiological pH values is dominated by the tendency
to oxidise to an insoluble form. 46
Structure
Ferritin (440 kDa) consists of a spherical shell composed of 24 subunits. Each subunit is an individual molecule that joins its neighbouring subunits through noncovalent interactions. There are
59
was then used to demonstrate that the bound ferritin retains its immunoactivity.
The conjugate sample was washed by centrifugation to remove any un-adsorbed ferritin, and
then incubated with its specific IgG antibody; anti-ferritin. Fig. 5.5(b) shows a ferritin-CNx MWNT
conjugate which has been exposed to anti-ferritin. This new conjugate (fig. 5.6) has an average
height of
200 nm and the images show a clear difference between simple ferritin functionalisation
of the CNx MWNT, and the additional anti-ferritin binding. During control experiments, binding of
the anti-ferritin direct to CNx MWNT was insignificant compared to its binding to the ferritin-CNx
conjugate (fig. 5.7). This result has also been seen for un-doped CNTs with a peptide antibody. 21
60
Figure 5.5: AC-AFM images of (a) an acid-treated CNx MWNT functionalised with ferritin, (b)
a ferritin-CNx MWNT conjugate functionalised with anti-ferritin, (c) and (d) represent the z-range
height profiles for each image
The binding of anti-ferritin to adsorbed ferritin demonstrates that the structural characteristics of the
epitope (the part of the antigen to which the antibody specifically binds) remain unchanged when
adsorbed to CNx MWNTs. 21
5.4.3 Azurin
Azurin (14 kDa) is a bacterial protein which is believed to function as an electron transferase, 41 it
belongs to the cupredoxin family and is a 128 residue Cu containing protein, which appears vivid
blue in solution.
The physiological function of azurin is that of an electron carrier, 49 specifically as an electron
donor to nitride reductase which is a denitrifying bacteria 50 (a bacteria involved in the process of
removing nitrogen from soil). Electrons are donated from azurin to the bacteria, where they reduce
nitrite to nitrous oxide. Azurin (fig. 5.8) is widely studied as a model electron-transfer protein. 51
61
Figure 5.6: Representation of a CNT functionalised with ferritin and then IgG anti-ferritin (not to
scale)
Figure 5.7: AC-AFM image of an acid-treated CNx MWNT after incubation with anti-ferritin
62
Structure
Azurin is a single-domain protein with a -turn structure composed of eight -turns, arranged in a
double-wound Greek-key topology (named after a pattern common on Greek pottery, it represents
three strands connected by hairpins, followed by a larger connection to the fourth strand, which
lies adjacent to the first). The redox-active Cu site is coordinated by cysteine, histidine and methionine ligands 51 allowing for electron transfer activity. 40 Crystal structures show that the redox centre
(fig. 5.8 inset) consists of a very irregular tetrahedral coordination with two S from methionine
(Met) and cysteine and two histidine N atoms. The bond between the Cu atom and the S of the
cysteine is unusually short (
Figure 5.9: (a) AC-AFM image of an acid-treated CNx MWNT functionalised with azurin, (b) CD
spectra for (i) free and (ii) adsorbed azurin, (c) UV-vis spectrum for free azurin and (d) UV-vis
spectrum for adsorbed azurin
and cross-over point of 204 nm and is typical for a protein with secondary structure consisting of
80% -turn and 20% -helix. 53
After incubation with CNx MWNTs any unadsorbed azurin was removed from solution by washing and the spectrum re-taken (ii). The concentration of adsorbed protein remaining after this process was found to be much lower than the concentration of free azurin (72 M c.f 280 M) and the
reduced demonstrates that fewer protein molecules are present. However the characteristic shape
of the CD spectrum remains, indicating that adsorption to CNx MWNTs does not significantly alter
the secondary structure of azurin through denaturing or decoiling.
Azurin also absorbs in the visible with a peak at max
Cu2 dx2 y2 ligand-to-metal charge transfer. 54 After washing, this peak is still present [fig. 5.9(d)]
although reduced in intensity, indicating that the electronic structure of the Cu chromophore is
conserved during adsorption to CNx MWNTs.
Anti-azurin is not available commercially, therefore an antibody binding assay could not be used
to determine the effect of adsorption to CNx MWNTs on the immunoactivity of azurin.
64
5.4.4 Cytochrome c
Cytochromes are a group of red heme proteins that undergo reversible oxidation and reduction
through their complexed Fe atoms. Cyt c is one of the three proton-pumping assemblies of the
respiratory chain which catalyzes the reduction of O2 to H2 O via cytochrome oxidase. 37 During
redox processes, the changes in charge may be considered formally to occur at the Fe atoms, but in
reality there is considerable electron delocalisation over the whole cluster.
4cytc2 4H O2
4cytc3 2H2 O
(5.1)
The cyt c heme group (fig. 5.10 inset), is bound with tetragonal symmetry 55 to the protein by
the thioether bonds of cysteine residues.
Structure
Cyt c (12 kDa) is a water soluble protein that consists of a single polypeptide chain of 104 amino
acid residues (fig. 5.10). In its native state, cyt c contains three major helices and two helical
65
Figure 5.11: (a) AC-AFM image of an acid-treated CNx MWNT functionalised with cyt c. (b)
CD spectra for (i) free and (ii) adsorbed cyt c. (c) UV-vis spectrum for free cyt c and (d) UV-vis
spectrum for adsorbed cyt c
and
elements inter-connected by loops. 56 The protein is roughly spherical with a diameter of 34 A
folds to form a hydrophobic interior and a hydrophilic exterior.
Fig. 5.11(a) shows even coverage of cyt c on an acid-treated CNx MWNT. The height of the
CNx MWNT is
c is
3 nm, this indicates that cyt c also binds to the CNx MWNT in the form of aggregates.
Free cyt c also exhibits a characteristic CD spectrum, shown in fig. 5.11(b)(i). The spectrum
is characterized by two minima near 208 and 220 nm and a cross-over point of 202 nm, and is
typical for a protein with a secondary structure consisting of 95% -helix and 5% -turn. 53 The CD
spectrum of adsorbed cyt c after washing, is shown in fig. 5.11(b)(ii). It is very similar to that of the
free protein, with both minima remaining, suggesting that cyt c retains its secondary structure when
adsorbed to CNx MWNTs. This is in comparison to the CD spectrum of denatured cyt c (in urea
solution) which is reduced to a single positive peak at about 258 nm. 57 Rearrangement or loosening
of the helical structure of cyt c can be indicated by changes in the 220 208 ratio. 56,58 However the
ratio of the two minima in the free cyt c CD spectrum (i) is 1.2, and this ratio is the same in the
66
CD spectrum for adsorbed cyt c (ii) suggesting that the overall secondary structure of the protein is
retained.
Cyt c also absorbs strongly in the visible region, exhibiting characteristic peaks between 200 800 nm. These absorption bands arise because of
conjugated heme group (fig. 5.10 inset). Fig. 5.11(c) shows the UV-vis spectrum of concentrated
free cyt c with the bands at
of cyt c in its oxidized form. 38 Fig. 5.11(d) shows the spectrum for adsorbed cyt c. The signal is
far less intense, because any free cyt c remaining in solution has been removed by centrifugation.
However the Soret and peaks are still evident, suggesting that the stable attachment 32 of cyt c to
the CNx MWNT does not lead to expulsion of the heme group.
An antibody binding assay was then used to demonstrate the continuing immunoactivity of cyt
c. The CNx MWNT-cyt c sample was washed by centrifugation to remove any un-adsorbed protein.
It was then incubated with its specific IgG antibody; anti-cyt c. Fig. 5.12(b) shows a cyt c-CNx
MWNT conjugate which has been exposed to anti-cyt c. This new conjugate has an average height
of
140 nm [fig. 5.12(d)] compared to the average height of the cyt c only conjugate of
40 nm
[fig. 5.12(c)].
During control experiments, binding of the anti-cyt c direct to CNx MWNTs was insignificant
compared to its binding to the cyt c-CNx MWNT conjugate (not shown).
The binding of anti-cyt c to adsorbed cyt c demonstrates that the structural characteristics of the
epitope of cyt c remain unchanged when adsorbed to CNx MWNTs.
Apoferritin
Apoferritin (fig. 5.13) has the same external structure as ferritin, 59 but is colourless because the red
colour in ferritin originates from electronic transitions within the Fe group. 46
Apoferritin is abundant in the -cells of the pancreas where it acts as an anti-oxidant. It is
produced in the mucosal cells of the small intestine and binds Fe to form its parent protein ferritin.
Both ferritin and apoferritin crystallize in the same structure in the presence of certain metal ions.
Apoferritin crystals (fig. 5.14) were formed by surface nucleation 60 into a face-centred cubic
67
Figure 5.12: AC-AFM images of (a) an acid-treated CNx MWNT functionalised with cyt c, (b) a
cyt c-CNx MWNT conjugate functionalised with anti-cyt c, (c) and (d) represent the z-range height
profiles for each image
68
Apoazurin
Apoazurin does not occur naturally but can be prepared by a series of dialyses (see section 5.3.3).
Whilst the secondary structure of apoazurin is practically indistinguishable from that of azurin, 61
observations during folding and unfolding, indicate that the Cu atom stabilizes the native structure. 52
Apoferritin and apoazurin were conjugated with CNx MWNTs (not shown) to ensure successful
adhesion. Following this, the apoproteins were used during biosensor measurements (Chapter 8) to
elucidate the contribution of metal ions to the sensing mechanism.
5.5 Discussion
5.5.1 Protein Binding
The metalloproteins undergo non-specific binding (NSB) with the CNx MWNTs, a result that
has been observed previously for un-doped CNTs. 3,62 The interactions between protein and CNx
MWNT are likely to be hydrophobic interactions, 19,63 or - interactions. 62,64 The adsorption cov69
SDS molecule per two amino acids. It causes proteins to denature and disassociate from each other
by forming a chemical bridge between hydrophobic and hydrophilic environments, thus disrupting
the hydrophobic forces needed to retain native protein structure. Detergent induced denaturation is
usually irreversible. 37
72
References
[1] S. C. Tsang, Z. Guo, Y. K. Chen, M. L. H. Green, H. A. O. Hill, T. W. Hambley, and P. J.
Sadler. Immobilization of platinated and iodinated oligonucleotides on carbon nanotubes.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 36(20):21972200, 1997.
[2] Y. Lin, S. Taylor, H. Li, K. A. Shiral Fernando, L. Qu, W. Wang, L. Gu, B. Zhou, and Y.-P.
Sun. Advances toward bioapplications of carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem., 14:527541,
2004.
[3] R. J. Chen, S. Bangsaruntip, K. A. Drouvalakis, N. Wong Shi Kam, M. Shim, Y. Li, W. Kim,
P. J. Utz, and H. Dai. Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes for highy specific
electronic biosensors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100(9):49844989, 2003.
[4] N. Wong Shi Kam, T. C. Jessop, P. A. Wender, and H. Dai. Nanotube molecular transporters:
Internalization of carbon nanotube-protein conjugates in to mammalian cells. J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 126:68506851, 2004.
[5] N. Wong Shi Kam, M. J. OConnell, J. A. Wisdom, and H. Dai. Carbon nanotubes as mulitfunctional biological transporters and near-infrared agents for selective cancer cell destruction.
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 102(33):116005, 2005.
[6] V. Renugopalakrishnan, A. Strzelczyk, P. Li, A. A. Mokhnatyuk, S. H. Gursahani, M. Nagaraju, M. Prabhakaran, H. Arjomandi, and S. L. Lakka. Retroengineering bacteriorhodopsins:
Design of small proteins by bionanotechnology. Int. J. Quantum Chem., 95:627631, 2003.
[7] J. J. Davis, K. S. Coleman, B. R Azamian, C. B. Bagshaw, and M. L. H. Green. Chemical and
biochemical sensing with modified single wall carbon nanotubes. Chem. Eur. J., 9:37323739,
2003.
[8] F. Balavoine, P. Shultz, C. Richard, V. Mallouh, T. W. Ebbesen, and C. Mioskowski. Helical
crystallization of proteins on carbon nanotubes: a first step towards the development of new
biosensors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 38(13/14):19121915, 1999.
[9] K. Bradley, M. Briman, A. Star, and G. Gruner. Charge transfer from adsorbed proteins. Nano
Lett., 4(2):253256, 2004.
[10] M. Shim, N. Wong Shi Kam, R. J. Chen, Y. Li, and H. Dai. Functionalization of carbon
nanotubes for biocompatibility and biomolecular recognition. Nano Lett., 2(4):285288, 2002.
[11] S. Bhattacharyya, C. Sinturel, J.-P. Salvetat, and M.-L. Saboungi. Protein-functionalized carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Appl. Phys. Lett., 86:113104, 2005.
[12] R. Prakash, R. Superfine, S. Washburn, and M. R. Falvo. Functionalization of carbon
nanotubes with proteins and quantum dots in aqueous buffer solutions. Appl. Phys. Lett.,
88:063102, 2006.
[13] B. R Azamian, J. J. Davis, K. S. Coleman, C. B. Bagshaw, and M. L. H. Green. Bioelectrochemical single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124:1266412665, 2002.
73
[14] Y. Lin, L. F. Allard, and Y.-P. Sun. Protein-affinity of single-walled carbon nanotubes in water.
J. Phys. Chem. B., 108:37603764, 2004.
[15] W. Huang, S. Taylor, K. Fu, Y. Lin, D. Zhang, T. W. Hanks, A. M. Rao, and Y.-P. Sun. Attaching proteins to carbon nanotubes via diimide-activated amidation. Nano Lett., 2(4):311314,
2002.
[16] S. S. Karajanagi, H. B. Yang, P. Asuri, E. Sellitto, J. S. Dordick, and R. S. Kane. Proteinassisted solubilzation of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Langmuir, 22:13921395, 2006.
[17] A. Star, D. W. Steuerman, J. R. Heath, and J. F. Stoddart. Starched carbon nanotubes. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 41(14):25082512, 2002.
[18] O.-K. Kim, J. Je, J. W. Baldwin, S. Kooi, P. E. Pehrsson, and L. J. Buckley. Solubilzation
of single-wll carbon nanotubes by supramolecular encapsulation of helical amylose. J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 125:44264427, 2003.
[19] B. F. Erlanger, B.-X. Chen, M. Zhu, and L. Brus. Binding of an anti-fullerene IgG monoclonal
antibody to SWNTs. Nano Lett., 1(9):465467, 2001.
[20] R. J. Chen, H. C. Choi, S. Bangsaruntip, E. Yenilmez, X. Tang, Q. Wang, Y.-L. Chang, and
H. Dai. An investigation of the mechanisms of electronic sensing of protein adsorption on
carbon nanotube devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126:15631568, 2004.
[21] A. Bianco and M. Prato. Can carbon nanotubes be considered useful tools for biological
applications? Adv. Mater., 15(20):17651768, 2003.
[22] S. C. Tsang, J. J. Davis, M. L. H. Green, H. A. O. Hill, Y. C. Leung, and P. J. Sadler. Immobilization of small proteins in carbon nanotubes: High-resolution transmission electron
microscopy study and catalytic activity. Chem. Commun., pages 18031805, 1995.
[23] J. J. Davis, M. L. H. Green, H. A. O. Hill, Y. C. Leung, P. J. Sadler, J. Sloan, A. V. Xavider,
and S. C. Tsang. The immobilisation of proteins in carbon nanotubes. Inorg. Chim. Acta,
272:261266, 1998.
[24] Z. Guo, P. J. Sadler, and S. C. Tsang. Immobilization of DNA and proteins on carbon nanotubes. Adv. Mater., 10(9):701702, 1998.
[25] C. Zhi, Y. Bando, C. Tang, and D. Golberg. Immobilization of proteins on Boron Nitride
nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127:1714417145, 2005.
[26] H. J. Burch, J. A. Davies, E. Brown, L. Hao, S. Antoranz Contera, N. Grobert, and J. F. Ryan.
Electrical conductance and breakdown in individual CNx multiwall nanotubes. Appl. Phys.
Lett., 89:143110, 2006.
[27] J. C. Carrero-Sanchez, A. L. Elas, R. Mancilla, G. Arrelln, H. Terrones, J. P. Laclette, and
M. Terrones. Biocompatibility and toxicological studies of carbon nanotubes doped with nitrogen. Nano Lett., 6(8):16091616, 2006.
74
[43] D. N. Petsev, B. R. Thomas, S.-T. Yau, and P. G. Vekilov. Interactions and aggregation of
apoferritin molecules in solution: Effects of added electrolytes. Biophys. J., 78:20602069,
2000.
[44] A Dictionary of Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 4th edition, 2000.
[45] K. Jiang, A. Eitan, L. S. Schadler, P. M. Ajayan, R. W. Siegel, N. Grobert, M. Mayne,
M. Reyes-Reyes, H. Terrones, and M. Terrones. Selective attachment of gold nanoparticles to
nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett., 3(3):275277, 2003.
[46] M. Heusterspreute and R. R. Crichton. Amino acid sequence of horse spleen apoferritin. FEBS
Lett., 129(2):322327, 1981.
[47] X. Yang and N. D. Chasteen. Ferroxidase activity of ferritin: effects of pH, buffer and Fe(II)
and Fe(III) concentrations on Fe(II) autoxidation and ferroxidation. Biochem. J., 338:615618,
1999.
[48] Y. Li, W. Kim, Y. Zhang, M. Rolandi, D. Wang, and H. Dai. Growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes from discrete catalytic nanoparticles of various sizes. J. Phys. Chem. B.,
105:1142411431, 2001.
[49] J. Leckner. Folding and Structure of Azurin - The influence of a Metal. PhD thesis, Chalmers
University of Technology, 2001.
[50] H. Nar, R. Huber, A. C. Messerschmidt, M. Barth, M. Jaquinod, M. van der Kamp, and G. W.
Canters. Characterization and crystal structure of zinc azurin, a by-product of heterologous
expression in Escherichia coli of Pseudomonas aeruginosa copper azurin. Eur. J. Biochem.,
205:11231129, 1992.
[51] N. Borovok, A. B. Kotlyar, I. Pecht, L. K. Skov, and O. Farver. Photoinduced electron transfer
in singly labeled thiouredopyrenetrisulfonate azurin derivatives. FEBS, 457:277282, 1999.
[52] J. E. Hansen, M. K. McBrayer, M. Robbins, and Y. Suh. A pH dependence study on the
unfolding and refolding of apoazurin: comparison with Zn(II) azurin. Cell Biochem. Biophys.,
36(1):1940, 2002.
[53] N. Greenfield and G. D. Fasman. Computed circular dichroism spectra for the evaluation of
protein conformation. Biochemistry, 8:41084116, 1969.
[54] L. Jeuken. The structure-function relation of small copper-containing proteins. PhD theis,
Leiden University, 2000.
[55] V. sMilitello, M. Leone, A. Cupane, R. Santucci, and A. Desideri. Local dynamic properties
of the heme pocket in native and solvent-induced molten-globule-like states of cytochrome c.
Biophys. Chem., 97:121128, 2002.
[56] Q. Xu and T. A. Keiderling. Optical spectroscopic differentiation of various equilibrium denatured states of horse cytochrome c. Biopolymers, 73:716726, 2004.
76
77
Chapter 6
6.2 Experimental
Using the set-up of Brown et al. 8 detailed in Chapter 4, simultaneous electrical and thermal measurements were taken. This required independent temperature and voltage circuits. A DC resistance
thermometer was used to record the cantilever tip temperature, and the electrical conductance of
the tip was measured with a lock-in amplifier, which detected an AC voltage drop across the tube.
A flake of CNx MWNTs was mounted in a Veeco thermal probe, a short exposed section of the
Pt-Rh core at the probes tip (known as a Wollaston Wire) acted as the resistance thermometer and
78
done in vacuum (105 mbar) to reduce extraneous heat flow. During the measurements the DC
resistance of the probe was monitored and a feedback loop controlled the probe bias current, to
maintain the probe temperature. The bias current and resistance were recorded such that on contact
between CNx MWNT and substrate (HOPG), the change in these parameters allowed the resulting
heat flow down the CNx MWNTs to be calculated. The temperature at both ends of the CNx MWNT
was known, allowing the thermal conductance to be calculated.
The CNx MWNT flake was brought into contact with the HOPG by lowering the probe (using
piezo control) until a pre-set force was applied by the individual CNx MWNT protruding from the
end of the flake. It was then moved repeatedly away from and towards the substrate (by means of a
force curve) at a constant speed (typically 20 nm/s) whilst thermal and electrical conductances were
recorded simultaneously.
6.3 Results
Individual CNx MWNTs have an electrical conductance of
aligned CNx MWNTs in contact with the HOPG substrate is moved away from the surface during a
force curve, steps in units of 1 G0 are observed [fig. 6.1 (blue)]. As thermal conductance measurements are also being taken, a corresponding step in the power loss (W) is simultaneously observed
[fig. 6.1 (red)].
More than 60 simultaneous electrical and thermal steps were observed and in fig. 6.2 electrical
conductance (G0 ) step size is plotted against the corresponding step in thermal conductance (or
power loss per degree Kelvin). Although there is some scatter in the data points, there is also a
linear trend with a mean slope 0.1445. The units of the slope in fig. 6.2 are:
W
T G0
P
G0 T
Q
G0 T t
(6.1)
Figure 6.1: Simultaneous electrical and thermal steps for an individual CNx MWNT
(6.2)
Q
L
t
AT
(6.3)
slope L
A
(6.4)
By considering a CNx MWNT as a solid cylinder 2 the cross-sectional area A will be r2 . Thus
using an average diameter of 21.7 nm (see section 7.3.2), A = 1.48 1015 m2 , and L = 2.44 m,
(see section 7.3.1) the thermal conductivity can be calculated to be:
Figure 6.2: Electrical step size vs thermal step size for CNx MWNTs
6.4 Discussion
The measured value of is an estimate because of the ambiguity of the dimensions of CNx MWNTs,
which make it difficult to derive a value for the absolute magnitude of the thermal conductivity. 5 Despite any additional error, a value of 240 W/mK is still significantly lower than the value measured
for individual un-doped MWNTs using the same method (2.5104 W/mK). 8
More similar values of thermal conductivity have however been obtained for a mat of aligned
un-doped MWNTs. 6 The reason for low thermal conductivity in these mats is the presence of many
defects such as atomic vacancies. 10 Che et al. determined theoretically the influence of various
defects, and as expected, found that decreases as the vacancy concentration increases. 11 Given the
concentration of defects in CNx MWNTs (section 2.2.2) it is not surprising therefore that they too
exhibit poor thermal conductivity.
81
References
[1] M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and P. C. Eklund. Science of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes. Academic Press Inc., New York, 1st edition, 1996.
[2] Z. Yao, J.-S. Wang, B. Li, and G.-R. Liu. Thermal conductance of carbon nanotubes using
molecular dynamics. Phys. Rev. B, 71:085417, 2005.
[3] S. Berber, Kwon. Y., and D. Tomanek. Unusually high thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84:46134616, 2000.
[4] P. Kim, L. Shi, A. Majumdar, and P. L. McEuen. Thermal transport measurements of individual
multiwalled nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 21:215502, 2001.
[5] J. Hone, M. Whitney, C. Piskoti, and A. Zettl. Thermal conductivity of single-walled carbon
nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B, 59(4):25142516, 1999.
[6] W. Yi, L. Lu, Z. Dian-lin, Z. W. Pan, and S. S. Xie. Linear specific heat of carbon nanotubes.
Phys. Rev. B, 59(14):90159018, 1999.
[7] T.-Y. Choi, D. Poulikakos, J. Tharian, and U. Sennhauser. Measurement of the thermal conductivity of individual carbon nanotubes by the four-point three- method. Nano Lett., 6(8):1589
1593, 2006.
[8] E. Brown, L. Hao, J. C. Gallop, and J. C. Macfarlane. Ballistic thermal and electrical conductance measurements on individual multiwall carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett., 87:023107,
2005.
[9] H. J. Burch, J. A. Davies, E. Brown, L. Hao, S. Antoranz Contera, N. Grobert, and J. F. Ryan.
Electrical conductance and breakdown in individual CNx multiwall nanotubes. Appl. Phys.
Lett., 89:143110, 2006.
[10] X. H. Yan, Y. Xiao, and Z. M. Li. Effects of intertube coupling and the tube chirality on
thermal transport of carbon nanotubes. J. Appl. Phys., 99:124305, 2006.
[11] J. Che, T. C
agn, and W. A. Goddard III. Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology, 11:6569, 2000.
82
Chapter 7
7.1.1 Solubility
Oxidation of CNTs is desirable because it improves their dispersion in water 3,8 due to the acid
groups created on the nanotube surface. 8,10,13 This is important because a major drawback of CNTs,
particularly relevant to their compatibility with biological systems, is their insolubility in all types
83
Figure 7.1: AC-AFM image of CNx MWNTs dispersed in water without (left) and with (right) 1%
SDS
of solvents. 14 All CNTs including CNx MWNTs, are very insoluble in water. They are slightly
more soluble in organic 15 solvents such as ethanol, methanol and acetone, but these solvents are
unsuitable for biological applications.
Un-doped SWNTs can be dissolved in water with the assistance of a surfactant such as 1% (by
weight) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) accompanied by high power sonication. 16 This process has
also been successfully applied to CNx MWNTs. Fig. 7.1 shows AFM images of the raw material
after 30 min sonication in MilliQ water (left) and sonication in a 1% SDS/MilliQ water solution
(right).
7.2 Experimental
7.2.1 Acid Oxdiation
Less than 1 mg of raw nanotubes was suspended in a 3:1 (v:v) mixture of concentrated H2 SO4
and HNO3 . The solution was left at room temperature in a sonic bath for 2 h. 17 The resulting black
solution was filtered through a hydrophilized PTFE membrane (47 mm, pore size 1.2 m, Whatman)
using a 3-piece funnel set.
84
7.2.2 Lyophilization
Recovery of acid-treated tubes from the membrane was low. Sonication was used to re-suspend the
oxidized CNx MWNTs in MilliQ water, and lyophilization was used to recover the tubes as a solid
from this solution.
23 mg of raw CNx MWNTs were subject to acid oxidation at room temperature for 2 h, washed
and filtered. The filter paper and glassware were sonicated in a sonic bath to produce 200 mL
of black solution. The solution was divided between two large round-bottom flasks and frozen
by liquid N2 with swirling to form a thin layer of ice, with maximum surface area possible. The
solution was lyophilized at a pressure of 1 mTorr and temperature -70 C. The ice was removed by
sublimation overnight, leaving 21 mg black, fluffy powder.
Figure 7.2: (a) Phenolphthalein in basic aqueous/EtOH solution and (b) molecular formula of phenolphthalein
0.01 mg balance) was briefly sonicated and then stirred in 0.005 M NaOH for 24 h. The solution
was titrated against 0.005 M potassium hydrogen phthalate, a weak acid.
The number of moles of excess NaOH was then determined by titration with 0.05 M HCl:
NaOH aq HCl aq
H2 O l NaCl aq
(7.2)
Figure 7.3: SEM images of flakes of (a) raw and (b) acid-treated CNx MWNTs mounted on Veeco
thermal probes (David Cox)
effect of acid oxidation on the CNx MWNTs can be seen in the image. The raw CNx MWNT flake
[fig. 7.3(a)] consists of many closely aligned individual and bundles of CNx MWNTs, whereas the
flake of acid-treated CNx MWNTs [fig. 7.3(b)] is highly disordered.
G-V and I-V curves, and electrical breakdown measurements were recorded for acid-treated
CNx MWNTs as per Chapter 4.
The thermal properties of acid-treated CNx MWNTs were measured using the same method as in
Chapter 6.
87
7.3 Results
7.3.1 Length Data
Length data are given in the Appendix (section 10.2). Acid-treatment of un-doped CNTs results in
shorter, open tubes. 13 The significant difference in reaction rates between the caps and sidewalls 7
is responsible for this shortening.
Shortening was also observed after acid treatment of CNx MWNTs. Fig. 7.4 shows length
histograms for (a) acid-treated and (b) raw CNx MWNTs. AC-AFM images (Nashville Toledo) of
dispersions of acid-treated and raw CNx MWNTs are shown in fig. 7.4 (c) and (d) respectively.
The average length before acid treatment was 2.44 1.59 m, and the average length after was
1.19
the
200 nmhour1 reported for un-doped SWNTs under stronger conditions. 3 The AFM images
show that the CNx MWNTs are better dispersed 17 after acid treatment and that the acid-treated CNx
MWNTs appear to be all of a similar length, which was found to be
time at room temperature was increased (up to 66 h) no appreciable effect on length statistics was
observed; it appears that the acid oxidation process is self-limiting.
Figure 7.4: Histograms of (a) lengths of acid-treated CNx MWNTs and (b) lengths of raw CNx
MWNTs. Corresponding AC-AFM images (Nashville Toledo) are shown in (c) and (d)
Figure 7.5: Histogram of (a) acid-treated CNx MWNT and (b) raw diameter data.
89
Figure 7.6: Acid-base titration curve for CNx MWNTs and NaOH
icantly larger than the 10-15% obtained for un-doped acid-treated MWNTs. 8,10,19 No appreciable
change in the percentage of acid functional groups was observed after acid oxidation for 66 h. An
example calculation of the percentage of acid sites is given in the Appendix section 10.1.
raw CNx MWNTs is well defined, as shown by the Gaussian distribution plotted in fig. 7.7(b) which
peaks at 1.0 0.3 G0 .
The reduced conductance of the acid-treated CNx MWNTs compared to raw CNx MWNTs is
also reflected in the current-voltage characteristics. The I-V and G-V curves shown in fig. 7.8(a) and
90
Figure 7.7: Histograms showing the intrinsic conductances for (a) acid-treated and (b) raw CNx
MWNTs
(c) for acid-treated CNx MWNTs are typical of the 150 different contacts measured. The average
slope of acid-treated G-V curves for the range 0 to 2 V is 0.19 G0 /V, significantly smaller than the
average of 0.70 G0 /V measured for raw CNx MWNTs. Different behaviour was also observed in
the electrical breakdown of the acid-treated CNx MWNTs. For both individual raw and acid-treated
CNx MWNTs, electrical breakdown occurs when the voltage across the nanotube (Vcnt )
3.0 V. An
example of the breakdown of an individual acid-treated CNx MWNT is shown in fig. 7.9(a). Once
the threshold voltage is reached, a stable current is maintained followed by two steps (each 40 A),
the current then stablises before two more steps (70 A and 80 A) with the final step taking the
current to zero. In contrast, during the breakdown of an individual raw CNx MWNT a gentle decline
in current is observed followed by a number of smaller sharp steps [fig. 7.9(b)]. Steps observed
during breakdown are normally associated with the breakdown of individual MWNT layers. The
large decline steps observed for acid-treated CNx MWNT may correspond to the breakdown of
many MWNT layers simultaneously. 20 The average step size for observed during breakdown was
60
30 A for individual acid-treated CNx MWNTs, and 20 10 A for individual raw CNx
MWNTs.
91
Figure 7.8: G-V curves for (a) acid-treated and (b) raw CNx MWNTs and (c) and (d) show the
corresponding I-V curves.
Q
T t
per tube. Hence the thermal conductivity for acid-treated CNx MWNTs cannot be
calculated.
92
Figure 7.9: Breakdown of an individual (a) acid-treated CNx MWNT and (b) and an individual raw
CNx MWNT at 3 V followed in real time. Arrows indicate the size of current steps in A.
Figure 7.10: Electrical step size vs power loss step size for acid treated (red) and raw (blue) CNx
MWNTs
93
7.4 Discussion
7.4.1 Solubility
CNTs are highly insoluble due to the very strong intermolecular forces that cause them to aggregate
in solution. Un-doped CNTs are uncharged so the forces operating are VDWs (see section 3.1.1)
which have a corresponding energy of
The forces are generated between adjacent -electron bonding networks on CNT sidewalls and
can be disrupted by sonication. However for CNx MWNTs, extremely strong sonication is required. 22 This is because of additional contribution to the intermolecular forces known as dipoledipole interactions (see section 3.1.1). As nitrogen is more electronegative than carbon (3.0 vs 2.5)
a small dipole is generated across the C-N bond which interacts attractively with dipoles on adjacent
nanotubes. Hydrogen-bonding is an example of a strong dipole-dipole interaction.
Sonication
Ultrasonication was used to disperse CNx MWNT aggregates and often a CNT ring or crop circle
was observed in AFM measurements. These rings are caused by bubble formation during sonication
of the CNT solution. In the simplest model of ring formation process, the CNT coils over itself to
form a loop inducing significant strain in the process. 23 When bubbles in the solution suddenly
collapse, the CNTs remain bent mechanically.
Figure 7.11: A TEM image showing the effect of the sixth pentagon (arrow) on a MWNT. The sixth
pentagon produces a sharp ridge which extends to the tip from Iijima et al. 25
hybridisation of the atoms from the sp2 of graphite to something intermediate between it and sp3 .
The rehybridisation causes the CNT to buckle and together with the curvature, this will accelerate
the reaction. 1
In a MWNT, concentric layers do not all react at the same rate - since each shell has its own tip,
the inner layers persist longer than the outer shells. 1
MWNTs after acid treatment. This was found to be the case, as measured by acid-base titration.
The self-limiting nature of the oxidation, as shown in the limiting length of
1 m observed after
2 h at room temperature, may indicate either the reaching of a structural impasse or the completion
of attack on all available nitrogen-based defects. The bamboo segments of CNx MWNTs may also
be weak points in the structure that are vulnerable to cleaving during acid oxidation.
If the reaction of all available nitrogen-based defects is the limiting factor, further shortening
of the CNx MWNTs (by reaction at heptagon and pentagon defects) would then require stronger
conditions. In order to test this theory, after 2 h at room temperature the acid/CNx MWNTs solution
was heated to 60 C for a further 1 h. The average length after this further acid treatment was found
to be 660 230 nm and the average diameter 11.0 3.0 nm.
Functional Groups
The two concentrated acids have different functions in the oxidation process. The nitric acid has a
purification function (to remove the metal catalyst particles 29 ) whereas the sulphuric acid creates
acid functionalities. An oxygen incorporation mechanism for CNTs is not entirely known, but the
overall result of the oxidizing treatment is the incorporation of oxygen into a C-C bond forming
ethers (C-O-C) 30 , alcohols (C-OH), ketones (C=O), and by far the most common, carboxylic acids
(COOH, fig. 7.12) .
The multitude of functional groups formed on carbon surfaces is due to the different reactivities
of armchair and zig-zag edge-sites. 31 The presence of esters (COOR) can be excluded as esters are
hydrolysed in acid media. 32
Whilst the surface will remain largely hydrophobic in nature, the defects are oxidized, producing
hydrophilic areas. These make the CNTs soluble in water and improve protein functionalisation
(Chapter 5).
Figure 7.12: A carboxylic acid group on an oxidized nanotube from Jiang et al. 17
sites) have been shown to reduce conductance due to scattering. 35,36 Whilst the effect of a single
-OH group on the electronic properties of a SWNT has been investigated, 37 the effect of multiple
defects produced during acid treatment, 38 is not known.
Given that multiple defects produced during CVD synthesis cause a significant increase in resistivity, 39,40 it is likely that multiple acid oxidation defects will have a similar effect. The contribution
of acid treatment to contact resistance could also explain the reduced conductances observed. Ago et
al. measured the work function of both raw and acid-treated un-doped MWNTs and saw an increase
from 4.3 eV to 5.1 eV after acid treatment. This increase was explained in terms of a reduction in
the -conjugation of the MWNTs. 19
97
References
[1] N. Yao, V. Lordi, S. X. C. Ma, E. Dujardin, A. Krishnan, M. M. J. Treacy, and T. W. Ebbesen.
Structure and oxidation patterns of carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Res., 13(9):24322437, 1998.
[2] E. Dujardin, T. W. Ebbesen, A. Krishnan, and M. M. J. Treacy. Purification of single-shell
nanotubes. Adv. Mater., 10(8):611613, 1998.
[3] J. Liu, A. G. Rinzler, H. Dai, J. H. Hafner, K. Bradley, P. J. Bou, A. Lu, T. Iverson, K. Shelimor,
C. B. Huffman, F. Rodriguez-Macias, Y.-S. Shan, T. R. Lee, D. T. Colbert, and R. E. Smalley.
Fullerene pipes. Science, 280:12531256, 1998.
[4] D. Tasis, N. Tagamatarchis, V. Georgakilas, and M. Prato. Soluble carbon nanotubes. Chem.
Eur. J., 9:40004008, 2003.
[5] P. M. Ajayan, T. W. Ebbesen, T. Ichihashi, S. Iijima, K. Tanigaki, and H. Hiura. Opening
carbon nanotubes with oxygen and implications for filling. Nature, 362:522525, 1993.
[6] S. C. Tsang, Y. K. Chen, P. J. F. Harris, and M. L. H. Green. A simple chemical method of
opening and filling carbon nanotubes. Nature, 372:159162, 1994.
[7] T. W. Ebbesen, P. M. Ajayan, H. Hiura, and K. Tanigaki. Purification of nanotubes. Nature,
367:519, 1994.
[8] H. Hiura, T. W. Ebbesen, and K. Tanigaki. Opening and purification of carbon nanotubes in
high yields. Adv. Mater., 7(3):275276, 1995.
[9] B. C. Satishkumar, A. Govindaraj, J. Mofokeng, G. N. Subbanna, and C. N. R. Rao. Novel
experiments with carbon nanotubes: Opening, filling, closing and functionalizing nanotubes.
J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 29:49254934, 1996.
[10] C. Niu, E. K. Sichel, R. Hoch, D. Moy, and H. Tennent. High power electrochemical capacitors
based on carbon nanotube electrodes. Appl. Phys. Lett., 70(11):14801482, 1997.
[11] J. Chen, M. A. Hamon, H. Hu, Y. Chen, A. M. Rao, P.C. Eklund, and R. C. Haddon. Solution
properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science, 282:9598, 1998.
[12] K. Esumi, M. Ishigami, A. Nakajima, K. Sawada, and H. Honda. Chemical treatment of carbon
nanotubes. Carbon, 34(2):279281, 1996.
[13] R. M. Lago, S. C. Tsang, K. L. Lu, Y. K. Chen, and M. L. H. Green. Filling carbon nanotubes
with small palladium metal crystallites: the effect of surface acid groups. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commum., pages 13551356, 1995.
[14] A. Bianco, K. Kostarelos, C. D. Partidos, and M. Prato. Biomedical applications of functionalised carbon nanotubes. Chem. Commun., pages 571577, 2005.
[15] L. M. Ericson, H. Fan, H. Peng, V. A. Davis, W. Zhou, J. Sulpizio, Y. Wang, R. Booker,
J. Vavro, C. Guthy, A. N. G. Parra-Vasquez, M. J. Kim, S. Ramesh, R. K. Saini, C. Kittrell,
G. Lavin, H. Schmidt, W. Wade Adams, W. E. Billups, M. Pasquali, W.-F. Hwang, R. H.
98
[29] H. Hu, Y. Ni, V. Montana, R. C. Haddon, and V. Parpura. Chemically functionalized carbon
nanotubes as substrates for neuronal growth. Nano Lett., 4(3):507511, 2004.
[30] J.-L. Li, K. N. Kudin, M. J. McAllister, R. K. Prudhomme, I. A. Aksay, and R. Car. Oxygendriven unzipping of graphitic materials. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:176101, 2006.
[31] R. Zacharia. Desorption of gases from graphitic and porous carbon surfaces. Dissertation,
Freie Universitat Berlin, 2004.
[32] E. V. Basiuk, V. A. Basiuk, J.-G. Banuelos, J.-M. Saniger-Blesa, V. A. Pokrovskiy, Y. T. Gromovoy, A. V. Mischanchuk, and B. G. Mischanchuk. Interaction of oxidized single-walled
carbon nanotubes with vaporous amines. J. Phys. Chem. B., 106:15881597, 2002.
[33] H. J. Choi, J. Ihm, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen. Defects, quasibound states and quantum
conductance in metallic carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84(13):29172920, 2000.
[34] S. Latil, S. Roche, D. Mayou, and J.-C. Charlier. Mesoscopic transport in chemically doped
carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92(25):256805, 2004.
[35] M. P. Anantram and T. R. Govindan. Conductance of carbon nanotubes with disorder: A
numerical study. Phys. Rev. B., 58(8):48824887, 1998.
[36] V. H. Crespi, M. L. Cohen, and A. Rubio. In situ band gap engineering of carbon nanotubes.
Phys. Rev. Lett., 79(11):20932096, 1997.
[37] H. Pan, Y. P. Feng, and J. Y. Lin. Ab initio study of OH-functionalized single-wall carbon
nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B, 70:2454251, 2004.
[38] M. Valcarel, B. M. Simonet, S. Cadenas, and B. Suarez. Present and future applications of
carbon nanotubes to analytical science. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 382:17831790, 2005.
[39] H. Dai, E. W. Wong, and C. M. Lieber. Probing electrical transport in nanomaterials: conductivity of individual carbon nanotubes. Science, 272:523526, 1996.
[40] K. Mlhave, Gudnason. S. J., A. T. Pederson, C. H. Clausen, A. Horsewell, and P. Bgglid.
Transmission electron microscopy study of individual carbon nanotube breakdown caused by
Joule heating in air. Nano Lett., 6(8):16631668, 2006.
100
Chapter 8
8.2 Experimental
The scheme for fabrication of the CNx MWNT biosensing device is shown in fig. 8.1. In the first
step, raw CNx MWNTs were sonicated in EtOH and then dispersed as a random network onto glass
substrates [fig. 8.1(a)]. An electrode gap was generated using a PTFE mask (b) and Au electrodes
were fabricated using electroless deposition (c).
A concentrated solution of CNx MWNTs was dispersed in EtOH by sonication. 100 L of this
solution was then deposited onto a glass substrate and dried on a hotplate. A 0.5 mm thick strip of
PTFE tape was placed over the deposit to form a gap and the substrate immersed in 5 mM HAuCl4
102
Figure 8.1: Scheme showing the fabrication steps for the biosensing device; (a) CNx MWNTs are
dispersed in ethanol on a glass substrate, (b) a PTFE mask is applied to create an electrode gap, (c)
after electroless Au plating the un-masked CNx MWNTs are coated in Au nanoparticles
solution for 60 s. After immersion, the substrates were rinsed thoroughly with MilliQ water. Plating
on CNx MWNTs and not in the gap was confirmed by AC-AFM imaging [fig. 8.2(a)]. HAuCl4 is a
yellow crystalline solid that forms a bright gold solution [fig. 8.2(b)] and during the process visible
Au plating was evident.
Figure 8.2: (a) AC-AFM phase image of gold nanoparticles plated on CNx MWNTs, (b) 5 mM
HAuCl4 solution
Au3 aq 3e
Au s
(8.1)
CNx MWNT aq e
(8.2)
System
E (vs SHE)
SWNT
+0.500V
Cu(NO3 2 /Cu
+0.340 V
Ag(NH3 2 /Ag
+0.373 V
AuCl
4 /Au
+1.002 V
PtCl24 /Pt
+0.775 V
software, was used to locate the probes, which were then positioned over the devices using micromanipulators. The I-t and I-V data acquired were recorded using a Labview program. Background
noise current measurements were taken before each device measurement, and were very low, approximately 1 fA [fig. 8.5(a)].
For biosensing measurements the devices were first immersed in phosphate buffer (containing
5 mM NaH2 PO4 and 5 mM NaCl, pH 6.01) inside a small plastic cell. When a stable current had
been established, 1 M protein solutions in the same buffer were then introduced to the solution and
Figure 8.4: (a) The set-up encased in a Faraday cage, (b) the probes (Kislon Votchovsky)
105
Figure 8.5: (a) A typical I-V background measurement and (b) control sensing I-t measurement
where buffer only is added (indicated by an arrow)
the response recorded.
8.3 Results
I-V curves were taken at various points during the plating process; the glass substrates had current
10 pA, the unplated CNx MWNTs a current of
1 mA.
When the devices were immersed in buffer an immediate drop in current was observed from
1 mA to
100 A. When this lower value was stable, protein solutions were added to the buffer
using a micropipette, and the subsequent decline in current observed. Control experiments where
buffer only was added to the solution [fig. 8.5(b)] showed no response.
Figure 8.6: (a) I-V curves for a dry device (red), after immersion in 5 mM phosphate buffer (blue),
and after the introduction of 1 M ferritin (black), (b) real time I-t measurement for a device exposed
to 1 M ferritin
time I-t measurements [fig. 8.6(b)]. A steady current of 90 A is observed until 1 M ferritin is added
to the solution (indicated by an arrow). Immediately after the protein (
20 L) is introduced, the
conductance of the device begins to decrease, before eventually reaching a stable value.
Figure 8.7: (a) I-V curves for a dry device (red), after immersion in 5 mM phosphate buffer (blue),
and after the introduction of 1 M apoferritin (black), (b) real time I-t measurement for a device
exposed 1 M apoferritin
As previously, 1 M ferritin was initially added to a device (fig. 8.8) producing a reduction in
current from 100 A to 50 A. Once this smaller current had stabilized, anti-ferritin was added,
whereupon a second signal change was observed (fig. 8.8), indicating successful binding of antiferritin to pre-adsorbed ferritin. 28
Figure 8.8: Real time I-t response of a device to ferritin and then a second response to its specific
antibody antiferritin
Figure 8.9: (a) I-V curves for a dry device (red), after immersion in 5 mM phosphate buffer (blue),
and after the introduction of 1 M cyt c (black), (b) real time I-t measurement for a device exposed
to 1 M cyt c
109
Figure 8.10: Real time I-t response of a device to cyt c followed by a lack of response to anti-ferritin
and a second response to its specific antibody anti-cyt c
8.4 Discussion
A protein binding induced decline in current was observed for
(in buffer) and percentage decreases vary greatly across the devices. This is probably due to slight
differences in fabrication as the devices are made by hand.
Fig. 8.12(a) shows that initial currents as high as 4 mA were observed for biosensor devices.
However the most common initial current was in the range 0 - 500 A. Within this range (inset)
110
Figure 8.11: Real time I-t response of CNx MWNT devices to (a) 1 M azurin and (b) 1M
apoazurin
Figure 8.12: Histograms showing the range of (a) initial current values observed after the addition of
protein for the biosensor devices (inset 0 - 500 A range) and (b) the drop observed as a percentage
of the initial current
111
the majority of devices exhibited an initial current between 0 - 200 and these devices were used
to record the results shown on the previous pages. Fig. 8.12(b) demonstrates that the percentage
current drop was subject to more variation than the initial current, but that an average percentage
drop of 43.5 23.6 % was observed over all devices.
Binding of the proteins to the CNx MWNT devices was irreversible, as the device current did not
recover upon rinsing. The results shown that CNx MWNT devices can be used to detect clinically
and biologically important interactions between antibodies and antigens. Biosensing experiments
were not conducted with ferredoxin because in Chapter 5 it was not shown to remain correctly
folded when bound to CNx MWNTs.
the electrodes had been functionalized with a protein-repelling polymer. In this case, no decrease in
conductance was observed indicating that protein adsorption at or near the metal-nanotube contacts
appears to be the key to conductance modulation. 28
Performance Limits
All nanobiosensors are subject to finite performance limits of the concentration of biomolecules that
can be detected under reasonable settling times. For a diffusion limited regime, when a sensor is
inserted into the analyte, the time required to capture a certain number of analyte molecules is given
by ts . This response time also depends on the dimensionality of the sensor such that:
0 ts
kD
(8.3)
113
References
[1] A. Star, T.-R. Han, V. Joshi, J.-C. P. Gabriel, and G. Gruner. Nanoelectronic carbon dioxide
sensors. Adv. Mater., 16(22):20492052, 2004.
[2] A. Zribi, A. Knobloch, and R. Rao. CO2 detection using carbon nanotube networks and
micromachined resonant transducers. Appl. Phys. Lett., 86:203112, 2005.
[3] P. Qi, O. Vermesh, M. Grecu, A. Javey, Q. Wang, and H. Dai. Toward large arrays of multiplex
functionalized carbon nanotube sensors for highly sensitive and selective molecular dectection.
Nano Lett., 3(3):347351, 2003.
[4] J. Kong, N. R. Franklin, C. Zhou, M. G. Chapline, S. Peng, K. Cho, and H. Dai. Nanotube
molecular wires as channels sensors. Science, 287:622625, 2000.
[5] H. Chang, J. D. Lee, S. M. Lee, and Y. H. Lee. Adsorption of NH3 and NO2 molecules on
carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett., 79(9):38633865, 2001.
[6] K. Bradley, J.-C. P. Gabriel, M. Briman, A. Star, and G. Gruner. Charge transfer from ammonia
physisorbed on nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91(21):218301, 2003.
[7] E. T. Mickleson, C. B. Huffman, A. G. Rinzler, R. E. Smalley, R. H. Hauge, and J. L. Margave.
Flourination of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem. Phys. Lett., 296(1-2):188194, 1998.
[8] P. G. Collins, K. Bradley, M. Ishigami, and A. Zettl. Extreme oxygen sensitivity of electronic
properties of carbon nanotubes. Science, 287:18011803, 2000.
[9] Y. Lin, S. Taylor, H. Li, K. A. Shiral Fernando, L. Qu, W. Wang, L. Gu, B. Zhou, and Y.-P.
Sun. Advances toward bioapplications of carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem., 14:527541,
2004.
[10] S. Sotiropoulou and N. A. Chaniotakis.
Bioanal. Chem., 375:103105, 2003.
Anal.
[11] R. J. Chen, S. Bangsaruntip, K. A. Drouvalakis, N. Wong Shi Kam, M. Shim, Y. Li, W. Kim,
P. J. Utz, and H. Dai. Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes for highy specific
electronic biosensors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100(9):49844989, 2003.
[12] G. Gruner. Carbon nanotube transistors for biosensing applications. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
384:322335, 2006.
[13] K. Bradley, M. Briman, A. Star, and G. Gruner. Charge transfer from adsorbed proteins. Nano
Lett., 4(2):253256, 2004.
[14] K. Besteman, J.-O. Lee, F. G. M. Wiertz, H. A. Heering, and C. Dekker. Enzyme-coated
carbon nanotubes as single-molecule biosensors. Nano Lett., 3(6):727730, 2003.
[15] A. Star, J.-C. P. Gabriel, K. Bradley, and G. Gruner. Electronic detection of specific protein
binding using nanotube FET devices. Nano Lett., 3(4):459463, 2003.
114
[16] S. Boussaad, N. J. Tao, R. Zhang, T. Hopson, and L. A. Nagahara. In situ detection of cytochrome c adsorption with single walled carbon nanotube device. Chem. Commun., pages
15021503, 2003.
[17] W.-C. Fang, C.-L. Sun, J.-H. Huang, L.-C. Chen, O. Chyan, K.-H. Chen, and P. Papakonstantinou. Enhanced electrochemical properties of arrayed CNx nanotubes directly grown on
Ti-buffered silicon substrates. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 9(3):175178, 2006.
[18] F. Villalpando-Paez, A. H. Romero, E. Munoz Sandoval, L. M. Martnez, H. Terrones, and
M. Terrones. Fabrication of vapor and gas sensors using films of aligned CNx sensors. Chem.
Phys. Lett., 386:137143, 2004.
[19] S. Peng and K. Cho. Ab initio study of carbon nanotube sensors. Nano Lett., 3(4):513517,
2003.
[20] C. P. Ewels and M. Glerup. Nitrogen doping in carbon nanotubes. J. Nanosci. Nanotech.,
5(9):13451363, 2005.
[21] F. A. Armstrong, H. A. O. Hill, and N. J. Walton. Direct electrochemistry of redox proteins.
Acc. Chem. Res., 21:407413, 1988.
[22] M. J. Eddowes and H. A. O. Hill. Novel method for the investigation of the electrochemisty
of metalloproteins: Cytochrome c. J. C. S. Chem. Comm., pages 771772, 1977.
[23] K. Jiang, A. Eitan, L. S. Schadler, P. M. Ajayan, R. W. Siegel, N. Grobert, M. Mayne,
M. Reyes-Reyes, H. Terrones, and M. Terrones. Selective attachment of gold nanoparticles to
nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett., 3(3):275277, 2003.
[24] T. M. Day, P. R. Unwin, N. R. Wilson, and J. V. Macpherson. Electrochemical templating of
metal nanoparticles and nanowires on single-walled carbon nanotube networks. J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 127:1063910647, 2005.
[25] H. C. Choi, M. Shim, S. Bangsaruntip, and H. Dai. Spontaneous reduction of metal ions on
the sidewalls of carbon nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124:90589059, 2002.
[26] A. Brenner and G. E. Riddell. Electroless plating by a process of controlled self-continuing
reduction. Proc. Am. Electroplat. Soc., 33:1623, 1946.
[27] S. Down. CNTs receive support for metallisation. Chemistry World, 2(9):25, 2005.
[28] R. J. Chen, H. C. Choi, S. Bangsaruntip, E. Yenilmez, X. Tang, Q. Wang, Y.-L. Chang, and
H. Dai. An investigation of the mechanisms of electronic sensing of protein adsorption on
carbon nanotube devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126:15631568, 2004.
[29] J. J. Davis, K. S. Coleman, B. R Azamian, C. B. Bagshaw, and M. L. H. Green. Chemical and
biochemical sensing with modified single wall carbon nanotubes. Chem. Eur. J., 9:37323739,
2003.
[30] G. C. King, S. H. Choi, S.-H. Chu, J.-W. Kim, Y. Park, P. Lillehei, G. D. Watt, R. Davis, and
J. N. Harb. Development of a bio-nanobattery for distributed power storage systems. Technical
report, NASA, 2004.
115
[31] H. Nar, R. Huber, A. C. Messerschmidt, M. Barth, M. Jaquinod, M. van der Kamp, and G. W.
Canters. Characterization and crystal structure of zinc azurin, a by-product of heterologous
expression in Escherichia coli of Pseudomonas aeruginosa copper azurin. Eur. J. Biochem.,
205:11231129, 1992.
[32] P. R. Nair and M. A. Alam.
88:233120, 2006.
116
Chapter 9
tibody binding assay for each protein. All bio-CNT conjugates were imaged using AC-AFM. The
apoproteins of ferritin and azurin were introduced for later biosensing measurements. An in-depth
investigation into conformational changes of metalloproteins bound to CNTs was given, which had
not previously been reported.
significantly lower than the values previously observed for individual un-doped MWNTs, but similar to values of for mats of aligned un-doped MWNTs containing many defects such as atomic
vacancies. A value for for CNx MWNTs has not been reported previously.
Figure 9.1: (a) SEM image of a flake of un-doped CNx MWNTs mounted on a thermal probe and
(b) high magnification SEM image of the same flake showing Fe nanoparticles incorporated in the
individual MWNTs (David Cox)
Figure 9.2: High magnification STM image of an individual CNx MWNT from Czerw et al. 8
the same fabrication protocol but un-doped MWNTs will also be carried out.
Several CNx MWNTs from a 1 ng/mL EtOH solution were found (by SEM imaging) to lie across
the electrode gaps (fig. 9.5), with further AFM imaging revealing multiple CNx MWNTs on each
chip. Individual CNx MWNTs now need to be electrically isolated to allow probe measurements to
be taken.
121
Figure 9.3: AC-AFM amplitude image of an individual CNx MWNT on top of the hexagonal layers
of bR
Figure 9.4: SEM images of (a) electrodes fabricated by EBD and (b) close-up of the same electrodes
showing the dimensions of the electrode gap (David Cox)
122
Figure 9.5: SEM image of an individual CNx MWNT (between the green lines) lying across two
electrodes (David Cox)
References
[1] D. Golberg, P. S. Dorozhkin, Y. Bando, Z.-C. Dong, C. C. Tang, Y. Uemura, N. Grobert,
M. Reyes-Reyes, H. Terrones, and M. Terrones. Structure, transport and field-emission properties of compound nanotubes: CNx vs BNCx (x 0.1). Appl. Phys. A, 76:499507, 2003.
[2] K. Xiao, Y. Liu, P. Hu, G. Yu, Y. Sun, and D. Zhu. n-type field-effect transistors made of an
individual nitrogen-doped multiwalled carbon nanotube. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127:86148617,
2005.
[3] P. G. Collins, M. S. Arnold, and P. Avouris. Engineering carbon nanotubes and nanotube circuits
using electrical breakdown. Science, 292:706, 2001.
[4] H. Hiura, T. W. Ebbesen, and K. Tanigaki. Opening and purification of carbon nanotubes in
high yields. Adv. Mater., 7(3):275276, 1995.
[5] E. Dujardin, T. W. Ebbesen, A. Krishnan, and M. M. J. Treacy. Purification of single-shell
nanotubes. Adv. Mater., 10(8):611613, 1998.
[6] K. Esumi, M. Ishigami, A. Nakajima, K. Sawada, and H. Honda. Chemical treatment of carbon
nanotubes. Carbon, 34(2):279281, 1996.
[7] J. Hone, M. Whitney, C. Piskoti, and A. Zettl. Thermal conductivity of single-walled carbon
nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B, 59(4):25142516, 1999.
[8] R. Czerw, M. Terrones, J.-C. Charlier, X. Blase, B. Foley, R. Kamalakaran, N. Grobert, H. Terrones, P. M. Ajayan, W. Blau, D. Tekleab, M. Ruhle, and D. L. Carroll. Identification of electron
donor states in N-doped carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett., 1(9):457460, 2001.
123
Chapter 10
Appendix
10.1 Acid-base Titration Calculation
In section 7.2.4 acid-treated CNx MWNTs were stirred with 0.05 M NaOH for 48 h and then titrated
against 0.05 M HCl.
The CNx MWNTs were stirred in 4 mL of 0.05 M NaOH solution. Calculate the total moles
of NaOH:
concentration
moles
volume L
moles
0 05
4
1000
2 104 mol
(10.1)
In this example, 1900 L of 0.05 HCl were required to neutralise any excess NaOH. Calculate
the moles of HCl required:
concentration
moles
volume L
moles
0 05 1900 106
9 5 105 mol
(10.2)
This value equals the number of moles of excess NaOH. Thus the number of moles of COOH
groups on the CNx MWNTs is:
Total moles of NaOH - excess moles of NaOH = 2104 - 9.5105 = 1.05104 mol
124
Appendix
Calculate the molar mass of CN0 035 , molar mass = 12 + (0.035)15 = 12.525 gmol .
moles
mass
Mr
0 00381
12 525
3 04 104 mol
(10.3)
atoms
1 83 1020 atoms
(10.4)
6 32 1019
(10.5)
100
125
34 5%
(10.6)
Appendix
Raw
acid-treated at 25C
acid-treated at 60C
l (nm)
d (nm)
l (nm)
d (nm)
l (nm)
d (nm)
325
18
237
15
203
10
367
25
342
10
304
10
388
32
345
14
376
12.5
418
24
386
12
389
10
422
25
391
20
401
12
545
40
403
20
426
10
558
35
435
457
13
580
23
439
22
471
603
19
448
12
477
16
633
32
453
19
482
10
685
25
454
10
491
12
732
10
469
23
517
13
764
11
470
10
536
12
830
21
495
20
540
860
35
508
11
559
880
14
516
10
590
15
895
530
12
611
15
922
19
545
20
626
12
929
22
550
13
654
8.5
950
12
559
19
674
11
126
Appendix
Raw
acid-treated at 25C
acid-treated at 60C
l (nm)
d (nm)
l (nm)
d (nm)
l (nm)
d (nm)
957
17
578
13
687
11
959
21
585
10
699
962
29
586
10
710
980
24
589
749
989
16
625
11
775
1010
20
626
12
788
1010
16
648
20
791
1030
20
657
13
813
1040
16
681
19
821
1040
31
699
13
999
1050
30
700
10
1000
1050
20
716
10
1007
1080
20
735
1017
1100
20
759
11
1040
1140
18
739
12
1050
1148
14
749
20
1100
1160
16
749
13
1167
10
751
16
1170
23
758
11
1180
23
781
1190
10
781
13
1200
10
785
1220
30
788
1280
12
796
1310
32
802
1380
17.5
806
127
Appendix
Raw
acid-treated at 25C
acid-treated at 60C
l (nm)
l (nm)
d (nm)
l (nm)
1380
25
815
1380
26
822
1427
29
822
1430
30
835
1460
25
851
1509
42
871
1600
18
881
1612
14
904
1670
911
1671
20
915
1682
24
926
1738
24
943
1780
949
1791
955
1820
962
1840
973
1893
979
1990
996
2014
1000
2020
1010
2054
1010
2058
1010
2112
1010
2170
1010
2272
1015
2280
1040
d (nm)
128
d (nm)
Appendix
Raw
l (nm)
d (nm)
acid-treated at 25 C
l (nm)
2310
1040
2387
1047
2448
1070
2450
1080
2560
1082
2621
1090
2700
1090
2716
1100
2720
1120
2752
1150
2780
1160
2870
1170
2950
1171
2977
1171
3148
1180
3264
1180
3343
1220
3350
1230
3364
1240
3400
1270
3440
1280
3450
1290
3450
1330
3552
1350
3585
1370
3622
1400
129
d (nm)
Appendix
Raw
l (nm)
d (nm)
acid-treated at 25 C
l (nm)
3710
1420
3769
1430
3850
1539
3910
1580
3926
1620
4080
1680
4202
1756
4202
1768
4224
1820
4240
1830
4296
1847
4307
1880
4400
1970
4550
2120
4970
2155
5030
2155
5057
2209
5060
2463
5270
2561
5300
2570
5370
2744
5450
2770
5450
2960
5450
3070
5470
3078
5510
3080
130
d (nm)
Appendix
Raw
l (nm)
d (nm)
acid-treated at 25 C
l (nm)
5860
3290
5873
3386
5950
3708
6219
3963
d (nm)
Prdr
d
0
d r2 sin dr
(10.7)
This is the probability of finding an electron at a point (r, ) in a spherical shell of thickness dr.
Where r is the radius, is the colatitude, is the azimuth (known as spherical polar coordinates).
Solving this integral:
Prdr
4r2
(10.8)
AOs are denoted by the notation ns, np, nd, nf. For example, in atomic hydrogen, the only
occupied orbital is the 1s orbital which is spherical in shape. Higher energy orbitals consist of lobes
and rings in accordance with the quantum numbers that define them. These quantum numbers are:
n - the principal quantum number which denotes the energy of the orbital.
131
Appendix
l - the orbital quantum number which denotes the number of angular nodes the orbital will
have. For various historical reasons a value of l=0 is designated s, and a value of l=1 is
designated p.
Thus for the carbon 1s orbital n=1 and l=0 hence it contains no node, so is spherical in shape.
Conversely for the carbon 2p orbital n=2 and l = 1 so the orbital contains one node in its shape
(fig. 10.1).
Appendix
Figure 10.2: (a) Hybridisation of the s and the px and py orbitals to produce an sp2 orbital and (b)
the bonding in graphite
bonds. sp2 hybridisation [fig. 10.2(a)] combines one s and two p orbitals resulting in three equivalent
hybrids directed to the corners of an equilateral triangle. This leaves one p orbital perpendicular to
the plane of the hybrids, to give a planar geometry. This is the kind of hybridisation that occurs in
the hexagons of graphite [fig. 10.2(b)].
Finally, sp3 hybridisation, as found in methane, combines one s and three p orbitals to produce
a tetrahedral geometry.
Appendix
For acid-treated CNx MWNTs, dissociation of COOH groups on the nanotube surface (into
COO and H ) will increase both the double-layer repulsions and the Coulombic interactions.
Appendix
135
Appendix
dx
dt
d 2 1 2 g
18
(10.9)
where d is the diameter of the particle (21.7 nm), 1 and 2 are the densities of the solid and
liquid (C = 2267 kgm3 and H2 O = 1000 kgm3 ), g is the acceleration due to gravity and is
the viscosity of the liquid (0.89 for H2 O). Using these approximate values a sedimentation rate for
CNTs of:
10.5.1 Amidation
Proteins were shown to adsorb more efficiently to acid-treated CNx MWNTs compared to raw CNx
MWNTs in Chapter 5. One of the possible explanations for this is the formation of amide linkages
between amines on the protein and carboxylic acid groups on the acid-treated CNx MWNTs.
The mechanism is shown in fig. 10.5 and involves attack by the N lone pair on the carbonyl
carbon. Overall the reaction is a hydrolysis as water is produced.
136
Appendix
Figure 10.6: Amino acid structures and their abbreviations, individual images from Wikipedia
137
Appendix
Figures of ferritin, azurin, ferredoxin, apoferritin and apoazurin were prepared using MOLMOL. 5
138
Appendix
References
[1] F. London. The general theory of molecular forces. Transactions of the Faraday Society, pages
826, 1937.
[2] N. Israelachivli. Intermolecular and Surface Forces. Academic Press, 2nd edition, 1992.
[3] V. J. Morris, A. J. Kirby, and A. P. Gunning. Atomic Force Microscopy for Biologists. Imperial
College Press, 1st edition, 1999.
[4] N. Nakashima, S. Okuzono, H. Murakami, T. Nakai, and K. Yoshikawa. DNA dissolves singlewalled carbon nanotubes in water. Chem. Lett., 32(5):465466, 2003.
[5] R. Koradi, M. Billeter, and K. Wuthrich. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of
macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graphics, 14:5155, 1996.
139