Jainism PDF
Jainism PDF
ETHICSANDVALUESINJAINISM
Jainismwasopposedtorituals.Jainismbelievedinthepossibility
of solving the riddle of the universe to attain perfection without the
concept of God. Jainism held that it was possible for any human being
to realize absolute knowledge and attain absolute bliss through the
intense human effort. The faith in self-reliance for achieving perfection
was an integral part of Jainism. The Jainism teaches claim that the
Jainasonlycanstandthescrutinyofreason.
131
Jainismbelievesthatnooverallgoodofindividualsorsocietycan
arise from violence. Jainism teaches that untruth, stealing, taking more
than one's fair share, immoderate pursuit of sensual pleasures and
possessiveness are aspects of violence. All these involve passions,
mentalviolenceofselfandofothers.DaleRiepeobserves:
TheethicsofJainismisnaturalisticinsofaras
itishumanistic.TheJaindoesnotdependupon
any supernatural deliverance or intervention to
achievemoksha.Herealizesblissonthebasic
ofhisownpowersasahumanbeing.
134
132
Damodaran,K.,IndianThought.AcriticalSurvey,p.128.
133
AmutacandraonPravacanasra,3.16.17.
134
DaleRape.,TheNaturalisticTraditioninIndianThought,p.114.
Jainas are openly hostile in the matter of introducing the
supernatural. Jainism believes that man is capable of controlling his
own moral life. He can make ethical decisions and find ethical goals
without non-human assistance of intervention. Ethical values require
that the individual either to make or unmake himself in the world. The
soul (individual soul) has a self identity which it preserves even in the
ultimate condition.
135
The morality brings about reformation in mans
nature. The conversion of the inner man leads to the way of freedom.
Man should attempt to develop the tendency of indifference towards
pleasuremanholdsinfinitudeinhisfinitude.Theeternalconsciousness
iswithinthehumanexperiencewhichisthepowerthatdirectsallhuman
beingsbeyondallfiniteforms.
AlthoughIndianthoughtconsideredbothspirituallifeandrational
lifeasuniversal,thespirituallifeishigherthanthelatter.Spirituallifeis
universal since the spirits, even for the schools that accepted their
pluralityhavethesamenature.Rationallifeisuniversalbecausereason
has the same objective reference according to the understanding of all
schoolsofthought.
136
Indianthoughtmaintainsthattheessenceofman
goes beyond even reason; it is tman. Several systems of Indian
philosophy hold that highest in man is not reason but spirit (tman)
which is above reason. Yet the Atman is stated to be not irrational but
suprarational.P.T.RajuSays:
135
Radhakrishnan,S.,IndianPhilosophy,Vol.I,p.312.
136
Raju,P.T.,TheConceptofMan,p.312.
Ifthedifferenttruthsaretruthsandthevalues
are true values and all belong to the same
reality,thentheremustbeawayofintegrating
them without being eclectic. The truths are
truths for man and values are values for man.
Manbecomesthecentreforreferenceforall.A
new standpoint for philosophy has to be
recognized. Man becomes the common
denominator for all truths and values and
therefore for all philosophies. All truths and
values have to be integrated without loosing
sight of their reference to man, who is already
anintegralitygiveninreality.
137
Ifthiskindofintegrationtakesplaceitwouldleadtoanewkindof
humanismofintegrity.Prof.Chakravartisays:
The history of Indian thought is the history of
Humanism with a bias towards spirituality we
may say in short, that Indian Philosophy is a
runningcommentaryonthetext,ThanksthatI
amaman.
138
JainismandBuddhismattachedgreatimportancetocharacterbut
nottoonesbirth.Itbelievesintheinherentpotentialitiesofallmenand
their abilities to realize them to become perfect. The Dhammapada of
Buddhism gave a rational interpretation of the word Brahmin in ethical
andspiritualcontext.
139
140
ThenewEncyclopediaBritanica.,15
th
Ed,p.473.
141
NormanBrown,W.,TheEncyclopediaAmericanaInternationalEdition,p.667.
Jainas believe that every thing has life and this also includes
stones, sand, trees and every other thing. The fact that trees breathe
came to be known to the science world only from the 20th century.
Mahvra who believed that every thing has life and also believed in
non-violencepracticallydidnteatanythingcausinghisself-starvationto
death. Mahvra was also extremely ascetic and walked around
completely naked because of his renouncement of life Mahvras
religion followers are less extreme than him in diets and they are all
vegetarians.
ThereligiousJainaswilldoeverythingpossibletopreventhurting
any being. They wont walk in fields where there are insects to prevent
the possibility of stepping on them. They also cover their mouth to
prevent the possibility of swallowing small invisible microbes. They
mostly do not work in professions where there is a possibility of killing
any living being like in agriculture instead professions like banking and
business. There are two Jain philosophies, vetember and Digamber.
Digamber monks like Mahvra dont wear any clothes, but normally
they dont walk like that outside their temples. The vetembara monks
wearwhiteclothesandtheyincludewomen.
The Jaina community spread all over India. They have produced
someeminentteachersandpreachers,scholarsandwriters,sagesand
saintswhosecontributionstomodernIndiannationallifeareimmense.
Among the vetambaras late crya
Vijaynanda, late crya tma Rma
(Ludhiana), crya nandari, crya
Tulasgai, late crya vallabha Sri, crya
Vijaya Samudrasri, Muni Jinavijaya, Muni
Suilkumar, etc., and among the Digambaras,
crya Desabhuana, Muni Vidynanda, Late
R. Hrall Jain, late Professor A.N. Upadhye,
etc.,arenoteworthy.
142
Sallekhana:
In Jainism, Sallekhana is a sort of ritual suicide undertaken as
part of the process of reverence for all life. It has traditionally been
regarded as a spiritual ideal for all pious Jain monks, but it is not done
very often today. Because Jains regard all life as sacred, an ideal
developed which involved the refusal to do anything which would harm
142
MuniUttamKamalJain.,JainaSectsAndSchools,p.142.
143
SagarmalJain,AnIntroductiontoJainaSdhana,p.4.
lifeatall.Thiscaninclude,whentakentoextremes,therefusalofboth
foodandwatersoastoavoidkillinganything-evenmicrobes.
Itisaslowprocess,whereinapersongraduallydecreaseshis/her
intake of food and liquids, resulting in death. It is considered a very
sacredprocessandisundertakenaspartofavow.Itisseenasmeans
of liberating oneself from the effects of Karma (action) and the cycle of
rebirths. It is also known as Samthara (death-bed) in vetember sect.
AccordingtoBharatwaj:
A person choosing to undertake Sallekhana
must truly understand the principles behind it.
He has to undergo a process of purification to
overcomeallpassionsandemotions.
144
145
Bharatwaj.,JainaEthics,p.225.
JainaAhis:
ThedefinitionofAhisinJainism:
The hand with a wheel on the palm symbolizes the Jain Vow of
Ahis. Theword inthemiddle is "Ahis". Thewheelrepresents the
dharmacakra which stands for the resolve to halt the cycle of
reincarnationthroughrelentlesspursuitoftruthandnon-violence.
148
ItispeculiartoJainvegetarianismthattheJainasaresensitiveto
even the microscopic living beings that are in all kinds of food. One
should not eat fresh butter because it is the birth-place of numerous
entitiesorjvs.Onewhohasrenouncedeatingatnightbythediscipline
of mind, body and speech observe Ahis. This is so because many
insectsarekilledwhiledininginthedark.Evenfreshvegetablesshould
150
Williams,R.JainaYoga,Introduction,pxix,alsoSinhaB.N,JainDharmaMen
Ahimsa,p.157.
151
Stevenson,S.,TheheartofJainism,p.210.
not be eaten because they contain numerous living cells (ananta-
Kya).
152
AnotherlatertextforbidstheJaintodigthegroundwithoutgoodreason
or to uproot trees, trample on lawns, sprinkle water or pluck leaves,
fruits and flowers.
154
The jain monks have to observe a variety of rules
forthepreservationofvegetablelife.AccordingtoAchryaUmswati:
Violence is the obstruction of life processes
through activities of body, speech and mind
tainted with negligence. Violence is of two
kinds: Physical violence and mental violence.
Obstruction of or injury to physical life
processes is physical violence and bringing
about untoward thoughts and feelings
constitutes mental violence. Jainism
propounds that injury to others invariably
involves injury to the life processes of self.
When we intend to hurt or harm others, we
havepassionssuchasanger,pride,deception
andgreed.Thuswealwayscommitviolenceof
theselfintheprocess.
155
AhisandJainEpistemology:
152
Pururtha-Siddhypya.,163.
153
cranga-Stra.,2.3.1.1.
154
Pururtha-Siddhyupya.,143.
155
NatthmalTatia.,TattvrthStra,StudiesinJainaPhilosophy,p.147.
Most of the people associate Samyak Darhan (rational
perception) with right faith. Faith commonly involves a merge of ideas
andactivitiessuchasunconditionalacceptanceofdogmaascontained
in a Holy Scripture or religious book, following a religious personality
such as a preacher, guru or scholar without question and indulging in
traditional ritualistic practices without any regard to rationale. Rational
perceptionistotallydifferentfromthese.AchryaUmswati,inTattvrth
Stra,definesrationalperceptioninthefollowingaphorism:Tattvaarth-
raddhnam Samyak Daranam Belief in reality, that is, substances
ascertainedastheyare,isrationalperception.
156
TheSanskritwordsSamyakandDaranliterallymean'rational'
and'perception',respectively.ThusSamyakDaranessentiallyentailsa
tendency, attitude or frame of mind that is free from any predisposition
orpreconceivednotions.TheSanskritwordTattvrthmeans'natureof
substances, their intrinsic attributes. Thus it implies reality, the real
natureofthings.Itshouldberemarkedthataworldlysoul,onaccountof
themantleofkrmicmatter,islimitedinitscapacitytocomprehendthe
natureofreality.Consequently,wecannotachievetranscendentrational
perception. We can only observe and study aspects of reality with an
open and unbiased mind, and then form our own beliefs. This implies
thattherationalperceptionofan individualevolves asoneadvance on
thepathtospiritualismanditbecomesabsoluteperceptionwhenasoul
156
Ibid.,p.148.
shedsallkrmicmatter.CommentingonthisaspectofJainphilosophy,
Dr.NathMalTatiastates:
"Umaswati defines right attitude Samyak
Daranasraddhnforthetruth,andexplains
raddhn as Pratyaavadhraa, that is,
discursive(goingfrompremisestoconclusions
inaseriesoflogicalsteps)determination."
157
157
NatthmalTatia.,TattvrthStra,StudiesinJainaPhilosophy,p.147.
158
NatthmalTatia,TattvrthStra,StudiesinJainaPhilosophy,VI.2-4.
159
AmutacandraonPravacanasra,3.16.17.
JainaEthics:
Nonviolence (Ahis) is the keystone of the Jain code of ethics,
which is a natural effect of rationalism. Jainas do not believe that any
higher authority hands down a 'system of laws' or commandments.
Jainas are expected to study the scriptures and grasp the concepts of
rational perception, rational knowledge and rational conduct. They
should consider their own experiences and realize that passions such
as anger, pride, deception and greed have a major adverse impact on
their lives. It is observed that if an individual accepts success and
failure, pleasure and pain, sickness and health, union and separation,
victory and defeat as part of worldly existence, he/she has mild
passions.Thisleadstocontentmentandpeaceofmind.Justaswewish
to have good health and peace of mind, so do all other living beings.
Thisisthebasisofthevirtueofnonviolence.
Jainismbelievesthatnooverallgoodofindividualsorsocietycan
arise from violence. Jainism teaches that untruth, stealing, taking more
than one's fair share, immoderate pursuit of sensual pleasures and
possessiveness are aspects of violence. All these involve passions,
mental violence of self and of others. They may also lead to physical
violence.Dr.A.N.Upadhyewrites:
"Jainism is perhaps the only Indian religion
which has explained the doctrine of Ahis in
asystematicmanner,becauseallothervalues
were elaborated on this basis. Violence or
injuryisofthreekinds:physicalviolence,which
covers killing, wounding, and causing any
physical pain; violence in words, which
consists of using harsh language; and mental
violence, which implies bearing ill feeling
towardsothers.
160
PracticalapplicationofAhisinJainism:
Violence may be committed, commissioned or consented to. A
householderisunabletoavoidalltheseformsofviolenceinanabsolute
manner, so he is expected to cause minimal injury to others. The
originalramaicthinkingdiffersfromthatbasedontheVedasinthatit
affirms, His remains always bad. The Purusrtha-Siddhyupya
considers perfect renunciation (nivtti) as nine fold. It is done on ones
own accord, by commission or approval, besides it may take place
throughspeech,bodyormind.
Imperfect renunciation includes only some of these
characteristics. He who is free from all sinful activities during sixteen
yamas(48hours)observesthevowofAhisinitsthoroughness.This
seems to imply that one perfect unit of the practice of non-violence
should last two days. The pure-minded who practise specific
nonviolence (viea-Ahis) confine themselves to a limited place and
abstain from going to many places. When one is engaged in complete
abstention, one becomes a saint. He who is engaged in complete
abstention,onebecomesasaint.Hewhoisengagedinpartialrestraint
(ekadea-virati)isonlyadisciple(upsaka).
161
160
Upadhye,A.N.,JainismincludedinAcriticalHistoryofIndia,ed.p.101.
161
Purusartha-Siddhyupaya.,3.76,157,140,41.
JainasAscetics:
Classificationofinjury:
In view of the sort of society in which we have to live, injury is
classified under four headings: 1. There is accidental injury (rambhi
His) in the course of digging, pounding, cooking, and other such
activitiesessentialtodailyliving.2.Thereisoccupationalinjury(Udyogi
His), as when a soldier fights, an agriculturist tills the land, etc. 3.
There is protective injury (defensive, Virodhi His) as when one
protectsone'sownorotherpeople'slivesandhonoragainstwildbeasts
and enemies. 4. There is intentional injury (Sankalpi His) when one
kills beings with the full intention of killing them, as in hunting or
butchery.
162
IntentionalinjuryorSankalpiHiscanbeabsolutelyavoidedby
ahouseholder.Itdoesnotinterferewithearninghislivelihoodandwith
discharging the responsibility of self-protection.
168
On the other hand,
rambhiHisispermissible. VirodhiHisisunavoidablycommitted
intheprotectionof onespersonandpropertyagainstthieves,robbers,
165
Amitagati,Srvakcra.,6.7.
166
Tattvrtha-Stra.,7.1-2.
167
Tattvrtha-Stra.,7.21.
168
Bhargavan,D.,JainaEthics,pp.109-110.
assassinsandotherenemies.
169
Thefactthatthepracticeof Ahisis
amatterofdegreeandishardlytakentobecompletebyitselfbecomes
obvious.Hewhorenouncesalluselessinjury(anartha-dada)leadshis
Ahistovictory.Oneshouldrenouncetheuseofarticlesofenjoyment
involvingHisinaccordancewithonesowncapacity(sva-akti).
A householder has to injure a limited number of one-sensed
beings. Except those he should desist from causing violence to other
one-sensed or immobile beings.
170
Perfect application of nonviolence
can lead to premature retirement from society and a negative
applicationofthenorm,ifthemindisnotsufficientlypurified.Atanyrate
according to the ancient Jain texts killing and injury are always morally
evil.Thereissomedemeritevenwhentheseareunavoidable.
There are many instances of advice against committing His.
Oneshouldnotgivesinfuladvice(ppa-upadea)topersonslivingfrom
art,trade,writing,agriculture,craft,serviceandindustry.Oneshouldnot
withoutreason(ni-kraa)digtheground,uproottrees,tramplelawns,
sprinkle water, pluck leaves, fruits and flowers. One should not give
each other instruments of violence (Hisupakaraa), such as knife,
poison,fireplough,sword,bowetc.Ignorantpeoplesaythatbeingsthat
169
AjitPrasada.,Purusrtha-Sidhyupya,p.45.
170
Ibid.,3.71.
habitually kill other beings (jvaghtin-jva) should be killed because it
leadstotheprotectionofotherbeings(para-jva-rakaa).
171
is very broad in
terms of the actions to which it refers and the
need for abandonment of such actions
becomes of foremost importance to the
spiritualaspirant."
172
171
AjitPrasada,Purusrtha-Sidhyupya.,p.6.33.
172
NeilSteinberg.,AmericasKillerExport-BigTobaccoGetsPass,TheDailyNews
ofJune5,2005.
AccordingtotheJainconceptofreality,allindividualsoulsofthe
universe are independent. Thus nonviolence is essentially non-
interferenceinthelivesofotherlivingbeings.Dr.Tatiawrites:
"A major part of Mahvra's teaching was
concernedwiththeappealnottointerferewith
thelivesofothers."
173
Thepurposeofadoptingthevirtueofnonviolence,includingother
virtues such as truth and non-possessiveness, is to attain the state of
absolute freedom. It is freedom from our worldly existence and the
accompanying afflictions and miseries. The universe continues to
evolve and so do the lives of individual worldly souls. Transformations
occur guided by the intrinsic attributes of the entities of the universe.
Formsevolvebutthesubstanceremainsunchanged.
Dr. Tatia summarizes that Mahvra adhered to the common
experience (regarding sorrow and suffering of worldly existence), and
found no contradiction between permanence and change and was free
from absolutism. Existence is not an evil by itself and freedom from it
doesnotmeantotalcessationofit.Mahvradidnotbelieveinabsolute
permanenceortotalcessation.WithMahvrachangewasasmuchreal
as permanence, and so his position was quite distinct from those of
absolutists. Freedom means freedom from passions only. It is a
qualitative change rather than total cessation. Evidently, the virtue of
173
NatthmalTatia.,TattvrthStra,StudiesinJainaPhilosophy,p.17.
nonviolence is a direct consequence of rationalism, a fundamental
conceptofJainphilosophy.
JainasAscetics:
AJainstradividestherightandwrongkindsofpenance(tapas)
into external (bhya) and internal (bhyantara) austerities. The former
comprises fasting (anaana), eating less than ones fill (avamodarya),
takingamentalvowtoacceptfoodfromahouseholder,onlyifacertain
conditionisfulfilled(vttiparisamkhyna),self-denialofghee,milk,curd,
sugar,saltandoil(rasaparityga),sittingandsleepinginalonelyplace,
devoid of animate beings, (vivikta-ayysana), and mortification of the
body (kyaklea). The internal austerities are penitence (pryacitta),
reverence(vinaya),service(viyavtya),study(svdhyya),detachment
(vyutsarga)andmeditation(dhyna).
174
AccordingtoBhargava:
The Jainas believe that it is possible to
consume the old karms by self-inflicted
suffering so that the consequence is good for
oneself. Yet more external penance, if
undertaken without success in internal
austerities, leads only to bodily harm without
any spiritual benefit. A modern scholar of Jain
ethicsadmitsthisbysayingthatpenancemust
becharacterizedbyspiritualawakeningorelse
it becomes a mere senseless torture of the
body.
175
Samitis are the five rules according to Jain texts. These are
careful movement (samyakgamana gamana), careful speech (bha),
carefuleating(ea),carefulplacingandremoving(gha-nikepa)and
carefulevacuation(vyutsarga).Theseactsofcarefulnessrefermainlyto
the non-killing of beings and to vocal non-violence. One is to limit the
areaofonesactivitiesinordertobeabletofollowcompleteAhis.
180
AJainshouldobservethreecontrols(dada).Onehastocontrolofthe
body (vapus), of speech (vacana), and of the mind (manas).
181
That
speechwhichisblamedevenbythebarbarians,whichisnotapproved
by those who are desirous of protecting the dharma and which is
undesired by the good people (sdhu-jana) should not be spoken by
gentlemen (sat). Carefulness of speech, bh samiti, is explained to
consist of abstention from backbiting, ridicule, talking ill of others, self-
praise and harsh words and speaking what is good for oneself or for
179
Williams,R.,JainaYoga,Introduction,p.XIX.
180
AjitPrasada.,Purusrtha-Sidhyupya,p.3.138.
181
Ibid.,3.202.
others.
182
Monks should not have enemies in the form of evil bodily
activitiesbecausetheyhavealreadybeengivenupandthereforedonot
come again. Monks should nothaveanyreservation incontrollingtheir
internalenemies(antaranga)likeanger.
183
Non-resistanceofJainas:
AccordingtocrgaStra,ifamonkisattackedbymurderers
orissubjecttohardship,heshouldbearthesehardshipslikeahero.A
mendicant who is beaten, burned, roasted, wounded, robbed, tortured
orkilledshouldbearitbravelyandguardhisspeech.
184
Amonkshould
notbeangry ifbeaten,norshouldheentertainsinful thoughts.Amonk
should meditate on forbearance.
185
Jaina ethics prescribe non-
resistanceforthemonkswhicharetobepracticedwhenfacingviolence
of every kind. The Tattvrtha-Stra defines dishonesty (anta) as false
(asat) expression (abhidhna).
186
Dishonesty is any wrong expression
(asatabhidhna) caused by fervent mentality (pramda-yoga) and
carriedoutinbody,mindorspeech.
187
Dishonestycanbeexpressedbyanyofthethreegatesofaction
and it includes dishonesty in ones own mind and is hence not
exclusively social in nature. We may also note that the definition of
182
KundaKundacrya,Niyamasra,4.62.
183
JayasenaonPravacanasra,3.16.
184
Acrangasra.,1.7.2.4
185
Uttardhyyana-Stra.,2.26.
186
Tattvrtha-Stra.,7.14.
187
Purusrtha-Siddhyupya.,3.91.
dishonesty includes a reference to motivation in the form of fervent
mentality.
Falsestatementsareoffourkinds:
1. Speech by which the existence of a thing with reference to its
position(ketra),time(kla),andnature(bhva)isdenied.
2. If a thing exists where it does not exist, with reference to the
position,timeandnatureofotherobjects.
3. Anexistingthingassomethingdifferentfromwhatitreallyis.
4. The last type of dishonesty consists of three kinds of speech,
condemnable (garhita), sinful (svadya) and disagreeable
(apriya).Garhitaspeechincludesbackbiting(paiunya),offending
jokes(hsa),itisharsh(karka),unsuitable(asamajasa),non-
sensical (pralpita or uncanonical (ut-stra). Speech which
inducesanotherpersontoengageincutting,piercing,ploughing,
tradingandstealingissvadyaorsinful,asitleadstothekillingof
living beings (pri-vadha). All that which causes uneasiness,
fear,pain,hostility,grief,quarreloranguishofmind,issaidtobe
apriya.
188
,anditispresentinfalsehood.
191
189
Yoga-stra.,2.55.
190
Purusrtha-Siddhyupya.,3.42.
191
Ibid.,3.99.
192
Yoga-stra.,2.56.
193
Ibid,2.58
194
Ibid,2.64.
If one is guided by pure motives, the whole earth (dhtr) can be
purified by right knowledge and right conduct.
195
This right type of
speech, which lacks any passionate motivation and which preaches
renunciation and the performance of ones duties, would not be
falsehood even if it were distasteful and caused mental pain to the
listeners.
196
But this differs from the consensus of opinion. Mostly the
Jaina scriptures advise to avoid truth (satya) if it causes pain to others
(para-pd-kara).Untruth(unta)istospeakthatwhichdoesnotconvey
any valuable idea (apraasta), which means a statement about a
present or absent object, causing pain to living beings (pri-pd-
kara).
197
AccordingtoJainismthefinalcriterionoftruth,oraccordingto
theotheropinionofthenecessityofmoraljustificationforexpressingthe
truth,liesinthepragmaticconsequencesintermsofnon-violence.
Non-violenceandMeditationinJainism:
Associalbeingsallhumanslikenon-violencesinceitguarantees
peace which in turn is a prerequisite for happiness. The roots of
violence are deep and extensive and therefore to destroy them is very
difficult. However, it is not impossible and the best way to do it is
meditation.Beforediscoveringtherelationbetweenmeditationandnon-
violenceitisnecessarytofindouttherootcauseofviolence,asalsothe
195
Ibid,2.63.
196
Purusrtha-Siddhyupya,3.100.
197
SarvythasiddhionTattvrtha-Stra,7.13.
factors which provide sustenance to violence. According to cry
Mahpragya:
One of the most important factors is stress.
Violence is not possible in the absence of
stress. A relaxed person cannot commit
violence. The muscles get tense, the mind
becomestenseandthefeelingsturntensetoo.
Violence is the natural outcome. Basically, of
course most tension is born of an agitated
mind.Therearetwotypesofstress:thatwhich
is born of a sense of arrogance and that born
of a sense of defeat. To the former belong
casesofstressarisingoutofangerandgreed;
to the latter those caused by despair, defeat
and indolence. Whatever the provenance, all
typesoftensionsgenerateviolence.Ahurtego
can spell disaster, so can the passions of
anger and greed. Similarly, desperation and
defeat can also result in violence, as is the
casewithmostsuicides.
198
Againstthebackdropoftensionorstress,itbecomesmeaningful
to talk about meditation and non-violence. The most potent antidote to
stress ofallkinds is meditation.Infactthemain aimofmeditation isto
free man from stress. Kyotsarg (abandonment of the body, a
motionless posture of meditation) and anupreka or contemplation
(reflection) is both a part of meditation. The former quickly relieves
muscle-tension even as drgha svsa preka (perception of breath
involving slow and complete exhalation and deep inhalation) totally
removes all mental tension. There are related techniques like indriya
sanyam mudra (meditational posture of controlling the senses), jyoti
198
cryaMahpragya.,JainPhilosophy,Non-violenceanditsmanyfacets,Ch.3,
p.45
kendra preka (perception of the pineal gland), anitya anupreka
(contemplationofimpermanence) andekatuaanupreka(contemplation
of solitariness) which cure specific types of tension. The main things
beingemphasizedhereistheefficacyofmeditationasacompletecure
forallvarietiesofstressandtension.
199
199
cryaMahpragya.,JainPhilosophyh,Non-violenceanditsmanyfacets,Ch.3,
p.46.
200
cryaMahpragya.,JainPhilosophyh,Non-violenceanditsmanyfacets,Ch.3,
p.46.
The third factor responsible for violence is an imbalance in the
ndi tantra (nervous system). Occasionally we come across cases of
motiveless violence. When questioned, the agents of such violence
simplysaythattheyresorttoviolencefornoreasonotherthanderiving
joy.Thistypeofviolenceisduetoanimbalanceinthenervoussystem
and its cure lies in samvtti vs preka (exhaling breath through one
nostril and inhaling through the other). It requires alternate breathing
throughthetwonostrils -inhalingthroughtheleftandexhalingthrough
therightnostrilandtheninthereverseorder,andrepetitionofthecycle.
Hath yoga recognizes two parts of the nervous system, the right
beingcalled pinglaandthe left ida. Inthelanguage ofmedicalscience
pingla is the sympathetic nervous system. By practising samvtti vs
preka a balance between the two systems is created. Besides, an
internal trip (travel of the conscious mind from the bottom to the top of
thespinalcord)alsohelpsrestorethebalance.Oncethethreepartsof
the nervous system-central, sympathetic and parasympathetic-start
actinginabalancedmanner,violenceautomaticallydisappears.
Another way of looking at the problem is in terms of the two
attitudes-positiveandnegative.Ordinarilymanhasapreponderanceof
thelatter.Hatred,jealousy,fearandlustareallsymptomsofanegative
attitudeandtheyarealsothefactorsthatcontributetoviolence.Racism,
casteism and all otherformsofdiscriminationgenerateviolencedueto
thepresenceofthenegativeattitude.Thereisaneedtothinkpositively
making it impossible for the mind to harbour bad feelings for others.
Meditation develops positive thinking by insisting on practising
perception of the self. Seeing oneself, introspection, anitya anupreka
(contemplationofimpermanence)etc.arethesuremeansofdeveloping
positive thinking and eliminating negative thinking, the fourth factor
responsibleforviolence.
Thefifthelementisbeingoverbusyorexertion-mental,vocaland
physical.Beingbusyandexertingareundoubtedlyessentialforlife,but
thereshouldbealimittothem.Todaymanhasbrokenalllimitsandhas
becomeoverbusy-avictimofoverexertion.Theresultagainisviolence.
Nature ordains a balance between work and rest, both mental and
physical, and between speech and silence. To stop unnecessary
exertion of the body and the mind, as also of speech, is to lead a
disciplined life. Observing silence just for an hour in the day will be a
greatboosttobalancedliving.Likewise,uselessandunceasingthinking
canproveunhinging.Soonceagainrestingthemindforanhourduring
theday-keepingitfreefromallthoughts-canproveimmenselyuseful.
Physical discipline, vocal discipline and
mentaldisciplineareintrinsictomeditation.By
practisingallthethreeofthemwecanseverely
restrainviolence.
201
Jainisamapragmaticcriterion:
202
Niithabhaya(4159).
203
NatthmalTatia,TattvrthStra.,StudiesinJainaPhilosophy,p.140.
Awareness of the correct view of reality (samyakdarana),
includingtheinterrelatednessoflifeandtheintrinsicworthofeachliving
being, is associated with a feeling of compassion for others.
Compassion (anukampa, daya, karua) is understood in various
vetmbara and Digambara textual sources and the relationship
betweencompassionandAhis,thecoreethicalvalueofJainism.
Jainism attempts to enforce a strict egalitarianism regarding the
objects of injurious action. Simply put, every life unit (jva) has equal
value. Therefore, Jain Ahis is based on the equality and universal
kinshipofallsouls.Thisegalitarianismisagreat Jainachievement,but
itsformulationisquestionable.
First,everyJainjva,justaseverySankhyapurua,isdistinctand
separate from every other, so a Jain cannot, strictly speaking, regard
anotherselfasher"ownself."Second,sympathyandreciprocity,along
withequality,mustbenecessaryconditionsfor Ahis.Truesympathy
and reciprocity are possible only in a system of internal relations. Jain
atomism, in so far as it pertains to personal salvation, is based on
external relations, i.e., the possibility of the soul to become completely
independentfromeverythingelseinthecosmos.N.D.Bhargava,aJain
philosopherstates:
The use of the negative formulation does not mean that the Jain
shouldnotlove.Itiscertainlycorrectaboutthedangersofself-centered
love, but the extreme caution on this point again reveals the radical
nature of the Jain approach. By removing the self from its social and
ecological relations, one can obviously remove most of the dangers of
attachment and the injury that necessarily follows. But one also risks
another danger, alienating people from one another and removing the
contentandmeaningofawholerangeofvirtuesthatarearguablymore
important than Ahis itself. Ahis is the intrinsic nature of man and
Ahishasabsolutevalue.
204
Bhargava,N.D.,"SomeChiefCharacteristicsoftheJainConceptofNonviolence"
inTheContributionofJainismtoIndianCulture,ed.R.C.Divivedi,,p.124.
205
Ibid.,p.122.