Voltage Support Control Strategies For Static Synchronous Compensators Under Unbalanced Voltage Sags
Voltage Support Control Strategies For Static Synchronous Compensators Under Unbalanced Voltage Sags
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
The increase in loading of existing power transmission system results in the problems of
voltage stability and voltage collapse. This has become a major concern in power system
planning and operation. In recent years environmental concerns and deregulation of power
utilities have delayed the construction of new transmission facilities. Hence with the existing
transmission system itself better utilization has to be obtained. Recently developed power
electronic based controllers have been used to meet this requirement. These controllers make
the transmission system more flexible in terms of controlling the active and reactive power
transfer and as well as the voltage profile of a power system. The power electronic devices
are used as controllers.
The FACTS controller stands for Flexible AC Transmission System. The potential benefits
offered by these controllers are reduced cost of operation and increased reliability of a power
system. There are five types of FACTS devices such as static VAR compensator (SVC), static
synchronous compensator (STATCOM), and thyristor controlled series capacitor (TCSC),
static synchronous series compensator (SSSC) and unified power flow controller (UPFC).
Each of them has its own features and limitations. From the utility point of view, they are
useful if they can achieve desired voltage stability criterion with the help of the most
beneficial FACTS devices. Many works in the literatures [1][2][3], consider only the AC
equations for voltage stability studies. This may lead to non-practical solutions in the DC
parts of the FACTS devices. In voltage stability assessment of the system with shunt
compensation devices like SVC and STATCOM has been compared with the IEEE 14-bus
system. For this purpose appropriate representation of equations in the DC parts of SVC and
STATCOM is incorporated in the continuation power flow (CPF) process in static voltage
stability studies.
Basically, FACTS controllers can be divided into four categories :
1) Series Controller
2) Shunt Controller
3) Combined series-series Controller
4) Combined series-shunt Controller
Typical applications of FACTS in power system are :
1) Effective voltage regulation and control.
2) Reduction of temporary overvoltage.
3) Improvement of steady-state power transfer capacity
4) Damping of power system oscillations.
5) Power quality improvement.
STATIC VOLTAGE STABILITY
Voltage instability is mainly occurs due to reactive power imbalance. The loadbility of a bus
in the power system depends on the reactive power support that the bus can receive from the
system. When the system approaches the maximum loading point or to the point of voltage
collapse both real and reactive power losses increases rapidly. Therefore the reactive power
supports has to be local and must be adequate to satisfy the requirement. There are two types
of voltage stability based on the time frame simulation they are static voltage stability and
dynamic voltage stability. Static voltage stability analysis involves the solution only based on
algebraic equation and hence it is computationally less extensive than that of time required by
dynamic stability analysis.
Static voltage stability is ideal for bulk studies in which voltage stability limit for many precontingency and post-contingency cases must be evaluated. In static voltage stability, slowly
developing changes in the power system eventually leads to a reduction of reactive power and
voltage declining. This phenomenon can be seen from the plot of the power transferred versus
the voltage at receiving end characteristics. The plots are popularly referred to as P-V curves
or Nose curves. As the power transfer increases the voltage at the receiving end decreases.
This eventually leads to the critical (nose) point i.e. the point at which the system reactive
power is low in power supply. Any further increase in active power transfer will always lead
to rapid decrease in voltage magnitude. Before reaching the critical point, the large voltage
drop takes place due to more reactive power losses. Now only way to save the system from
voltage collapse is by reducing the reactive power load or add additional reactive power prior
to reaching the point of voltage collapse. In practice, placing adequate reactive power support
at the weakest bus enhances static-voltage stability margins. The weakest bus is defined as
the bus which is near to experience a voltage collapse.