History and Legal Basis of Land Reform and Agrarian Reform
History and Legal Basis of Land Reform and Agrarian Reform
History and Legal Basis of Land Reform and Agrarian Reform
Orminita PH 2Y2-1
REFORM
AND
AGRARIAN
Pre-Spanish era
This land is Ours God gave this land to us
Before the Spaniards came to the
Philippines, Filipinos lived in villages or
barangaysruled by chiefs or datus. The
datus comprised the nobility. Then came the
maharlikas(freemen), followed by the aliping
mamamahay (serfs) and aliping saguiguilid
(slaves). However, despite the existence of
different classes in the social structure,
practically everyone had access to the fruits
of the soil. Money was unknown, and rice
served as themedium of exchange.
In these barangays, everyone regardless of
status had access on the land and mutually
shares resources to the rest of the
community. They believed in and practiced
the concept of stewardship where
relationship between man and nature is
important.
Land cultivation was done commonly by
kaingin system or the slash and burn
method wherein land was cleared by
burning the bushes before planting the crops
or either land was plowed and harrowed
before planting. On the other hand, food
production was intended for family
consumption only at first but later on
neighboring communities where engaged in
a barter trade, exchanging their goods with
others. Some even traded their agricultural
products with luxury items of some foreign
traders like the Chinese, Arabs and
Europeans.
The only recorded transaction of land sale
Spanish era
When the Spaniards came to the
Philippines, the concept of encomienda
(Royal Land Grants) was introduced.
This system grants that Encomienderos
must defend his encomienda from
external attack, maintain peace and
order
within,
and
support
the
missionaries. In turn, the encomiendero
acquired the right to collect tribute from
the indios (native). The system,
however, degenerated into abuse of
power by the encomienderos The tribute
soon became land rents to a few
powerful landlords. And the natives who
once cultivated he lands in freedom
were transformed into mere share
tenants.
o
American era
Realizing that being landless was the
main cause ofsocial unrest and revolt at
that time, the Americans sought to put
an end to the miserable conditions of
the tenant tillers and small farmers by
passing several land policies to widen
the base of small landholdings and
distribute land ownership among the
greater number of Filipino tenants and
farmers.
In connection to this, the Philippine Bill
of 1902 was passed which provided
regulations on the disposal of public
lands wherein a private individual can
own 16 hectares of land while the
corporate land holdings can avail of 1,
024 hectares. This also gave the rights
to the Americans to own agricultural
lands.
o
A
program
called
the
Homestead
Program
was
introduced in 1903 that allowed
an enterprising tenant to acquire
a farm of at least 16 hectares to
cultivate. However, the program
was
not
implemented
nationwide and was introduced
only in some parts of Mindanao
and Northern Luzon, where
there were available public
alienable and disposable lands.
There is also the Friar Land
Act or Act No. 1120 which
provided the administrative and
temporary leasing and selling of
friar lands to its tillers.
The first legislation regulating
the relationships of landlord and
tenants and the first law to
legalize a 50-50 crop sharing
arrangement
was
also
Commonwealth era
In the history of agrarian reform, the
Commonwealth Period stands out as
the time when the tenants were able to
make some headway in their struggle
for land tenure with the passage of
Commonwealth Acts (CA) 178 and
461 and the creation of the precursors
to the Department of Agrarian Reform
were created the Rural Program and
the
National
Settlement
Administrations.
To give flesh to the Social Justice
provision of the 1935 Constitution, Pres.
Manuel L. Quezon enacted CA No. 178
on November 13, 1936 providing certain
controls
in
the
landlord-tenant
relationship. On the same year, the
National Rice and Corn Corporation
(NARIC)
was
created.
NARIC
established controls over the price of
rice and corn in its effort to help farmers
and consumers. The next 3 years that
followed saw the passage of CA Nos.
461 and 441 and the creation of the
Rural Program Administration (March
2,
1939).
The
Rural
Program
Administration administered the sale
and lease of haciendas to the tenants.
CA No. 461 further protected the rights
of tenants by providing specific reasons
and the need for the approval by the
Tenancy Division of the Department of
Justice before a tenant may be
dismissed while CA 441 which was
enacted on June 3, 1939 created the
National Settlement Administration.
During these years the situation of land
ownership
and
tenancy
were
characterized
by
the
contrasting
economic and political lifestyle between
tenant and the landlord. Landlords
became richer and powerful while the
tenants were deprived of their rights,
became
poorer
and
absentee
Japanese Era
During the Japanese occupation,
peasants and workers organized the
HUKBALAHAP (Hukbong Bayan Laban
sa mga Hapon) on March 29, 1942 as
an anti-Japanese group. They took over
vast tracts of land and gave the land to
the people.
For them, the war was a golden
opportunity for peoples initiative to push
pro-poor programs. Landlords were
overpowered by the peasants but
unfortunately at the end of the war,
through the help of the military police
and civilian guards, landlords were able
to retrieve their lands from the
HUKBALAHAP.
Credit
Cooperative
FinancingAdministration)
-Provided small farmers and
share tenants loans with low
interest ratesof six to eight
percent.
Abolished
share
tenancy,
institutionalized leasehold, set
retention limit at 75 hectares,
invested rights of preemption
and redemption for tenant
farmers,
provided
for
an
administrative machinery for
implementation, institutionalized
a judicial system of agrarian
cases, incorporated extension,
marketing and supervised credit
system of services of farmer
beneficiaries. The RA was
hailed as one that would
emancipate Filipino farmers
from the bondage of tenancy.
Finally, it emphasized ownercultivator
relationship
and
farmer independence, equity,
productivity improvement and
the public distribution of land..
References:
http://www.academia.edu/1851380/Agrarian_Reform
_History
http://www.dar.gov.ph/major-final-outputs-mfos/9main/996-dar-historical-background