Terms of Stare Decisis
Terms of Stare Decisis
Terms of Stare Decisis
Prima facie: At first sight; in the first appearance; in the face of it; so far as can be judged
from the first disclosure; presumably; a fact presumed to be true unless disproved by some
evidence to the contrary. State ex rel. Herbert v. Whims, 68 Ohio App. 39, 38 N.E.2d
596, 599.
.
3
Ab Initio: From the beginning; from the first act; entirely, as to all the acts done in the
inception. A party may be said to be a trespasser, an estate to be good, an agreement or
deed to be void, or marriage to be unlawful, ab initio. Plow. 61, 16a; 1 Bl.Comm. 440;
Hopkins v. Hopkins, 10 Johns. (N.Y.) 369. (before contrasted with this sense with ex post
facto)
.
4
Colorable:That which has or gives color. That which is in appearance only, and not in
reality, what it purports to be. Counterfeit, feigned, having the appearance of truth . Ellis v.
Jones, 73 Colo. 516, 216 P. 257, 258.
.
5
Power Of Attorney:A private attorney authorized by another to act in his place and
stead, either for some particular purpose, as to do a particular act, or for the transaction of
business in general, not of a legal character.
.
Wardship: In military tenures, the right of the lord to have custody, as guardian of the body
and lands of the infant heir, without any account of profits, until he was twenty-one or she
sixteen. In socage the guardian was accountable for profits; and he was not the lord, but the
nearest relative to whom the inheritance could not descend, and the wardship ceased at
fourteen. In copyholds, the lord was the guardian, but was perhaps accountable for profits.
.
6
Minority:
.
8
.
Abandonment includes both intention to abandon and the external act by which the
intentions carried into effect. In determining whether one has abandoned his property or
rights, the intention is the first and paramount object of inquiry, for there can be no
abandonment without the intention to abandon. Generally, abandonment can arise form a
single act or form a series of acts.
.
Time is not an essential element of abandonment, although the lapse of time may be
evidence of an intention to abandon, and where it is accompanied by acts manifesting such
an intention, it may be considered in determining whether there has been an abandonment.
.
Abandonment differs from surrender in that surrender requires an agreement, and from
forfeiture, in that forfeiture may be against the intention of the party alleged to have forfeited
.
9
Color Of Authority:
That semblance or presumption of authority sustaining the acts of a public
officer which his derived from his apparent title to the office of from a writ or
other process in his hands apparently valid and regular. State v. Oates, 86
Wis. 634, 57 N.W. 296, 39 Am.St.Rep. 912.
.
.
11
Conspiratorial Extortion:
Extort: involuntary admission to overcome power of resistance through
threat, duress, and coercion to unlawfully obtain money from another.
Conspiracy: A combination or an agreement between two or more persons, for
accomplishing an unlawful end or a lawful end by unlawful means.
The essence of conspiracy: is an agreement, together with an overt act, to do an
unlawful act, or do a lawful act in an unlawful manner. Actors may drop out, and
others drop in; details may change from time to time; the members need not know
each other or the part played by others; a member need not know all the details of the
plan or the operations; he must, however, know the purpose of the conspiracy and agree to become a
party to a plan to effectuate that purpose.
manner; or to commit any offense punishable by law; or to do any act with intent
to prevent the course of justice; or to effect a legal purpose with a corrupt intent,
or by improper means.
.
12 Rescission
P.2d 548, 549, Kunde v. OBrian, 214 Iwoa 921, 243 N.W. 594, 595. It necessarily involves
a repudiation of the contract and a refusal of the moving party to be further bound by it. Wall v.
Zynda, 283 Mich. 260, 278 N.QW. 66, 68, 114 A.L.R. 1521.
.
13
15 Dissolution
Dissolution Of Corporation:
The dissolution of a corporation is the termination of its existence as a body
politic. This may take place n several ways; as by at of the legislature, where
that is constitutional by surrender or forfeiture of its charter; by expiration of it
charter by lapse of time; by proceedings for winding it up under the law; by loss
of all its members or their reduction below the statutory limit. New York Title &
Mortgage Co. v. Friedman, 276 N.Y.S. 72, 153 Misc. 697; Bruun v. Katz Drug
Co., 351 Mo. 731, 173 S.W. 2d 906, 909.
.
17
v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co., 137 Va. 526, 130 S.E. 506, 509.
.
19
Negotiable Instruments:
An instrument embodying an obligation for the payment of money is called
negotiable when the legal title to the instrument itself and to the whole
amount of money expressed upon its face, with the right to sue therefore in
his own name, may be transferred from one person to another without a
formal assignment, but by mere endorsement and delivery by the holder or
by delivery only. 1 Daniel, Nego. Inst. 1; Walker v. Ocean Bank, 19 Ind.
247; Robinson v. Wilkinson, 38 Mich. 299.
.
.
21
Nunc Pro Tunc: Now for then. Nunc pro tunc entry is an entry made now of
something actually previously done to have effect of former date; office being not to
supply omitted action, but to supply omission in record of action really had but
omitted through inadvertence or mistake.
.
.22
23
24
Color Of Office:
An act unjustly done by the countenance of an office, being grounded
upon corruption, to which the office is as a shadow and color. Plow.
64. Day v. National Bond & Investment Co., Mo.App., 99 S.W.2d 117, 119.
.
25
Res Judicata:
Note: This is in regards to Stare Decisis case laws, which apply to ALL
states and several states, etc. This is distinguished with Estoppel as it is the
basis upon a cause and need for an Estoppel, the intent of an Estoppel in its
broadest sense is penalty paid by one perpetrating wrong [defacto court
adminstrators] by known fraud or by affirmative act which, though with (or
without) fraudulent intent, may result in legal fraud on another. This is what
is being done in most of the defacto fraudulent courts in that they violate the
law against the people, yet they are deemed to know the law by their very
position and seats they sit in.